Stephen Lim1,2*Narongrit Dhamabutra1*- 1Department of Western Music, Faculty of Fine and Applied Arts, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
- 2Department of Educational Research and Psychology, Faculty of Education, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
Introduction
Music performance anxiety (MPA) commonly refers to the experience of marked and persistent anxious apprehension related to musical performance that has arisen through specific anxiety-conditioning experiences (1). Studies estimating the prevalence of MPA among music students and professionals have reported wide-ranging figures from 16% to even 96% (for recent reviews, see 2–4). Numerous coping strategies and interventions have been developed over the years (for reviews, see 3–9), although MPA prevalence rates have not substantially changed at the population level over the years, suggesting that extant interventions on overall may have limited impact (4). Importantly, treating the symptoms of MPA does not necessarily resolve its root cause. Musicians have reported experiencing anxiety far in advance of their performance, rather than only during their actual performance on stage (10). In reality, music performance in evaluative situations carries high demands—whether perceived or actual—on the performer to attain (near) perfection. Such pressures and strivings for errorless performance and perfection may be particularly acute in some genres such as Western classical music, especially in solo or soloist performances (11, 12; see also 13), where musicians face challenges ranging from temporally precise fine motor technique, sustaining attention over long durations, memorizing complex material, to interpretative and musical communication skills (14, 15). Yet, many MPA studies do not screen participants for weak technical musical ability, and for whom anxiety may be a consequence (rather than a cause) of poor performance (7). As Faur et al. (5) note in their review, that extant MPA interventions do not always improve performance quality could be due to their focus on treating anxiety symptoms without targeting the improvement of technical skill (see also 16). Indeed, debilitating anxiety could result from inadequate preparation and deficits in musical technique.
Psychological insights
Do test-anxious persons actually perform worse in evaluative situations than their knowledge or skill would otherwise allow? This commonly held but rarely tested assumption has recently been challenged in a field study. Using log files from a digital learning platform, Theobald et al. (17) examined data from 309 medical students preparing for a high-stakes exam. The students’ test anxiety at the start of the study was negatively associated with their final exam performance, as well as their preparation performance when completing old exam questions over 100 days before their final exam, and their performance on a mock exam 28 days before their final exam. If students’ test anxiety (e.g., fears about knowledge deficits or negative consequences of poor exam performance) interferes with their processing and performance during evaluative situations, then high-anxiety students should perform worse on the high-stakes final exam than non-evaluative mock exam, and this performance decline should correlate with their test anxiety. But this was not the case. Instead, students’ test anxiety did not predict a drop in their performance from the mock exam to final exam. Furthermore, when controlling for students’ mock exam performance, their test anxiety did not predict their final exam performance.
These findings reveal that highly test-anxious students’ lower knowledge levels accounts for the link between their test anxiety and worse final exam performance. In line with this idea, Theobald et al. (17) found that students with high test anxiety tended to show less knowledge gains during their exam preparation. Moreover, whereas higher state anxiety in the morning did not predict the number of practice questions that students correctly solved on that day during their exam preparation, correctly solving fewer questions predicted students’ higher state anxiety the next day. Thus, awareness of one’s poorer knowledge may trigger test anxiety. The key implication is that short-term interventions which aim to reduce test anxiety shortly before or during the evaluative situation may have limited impact because they cannot offset long-term knowledge deficits. Rather, effective learning strategies that boost and secure actual deep learning are needed to tackle test anxiety at its root.
These findings have important implications for music performance practice. Some recent evidence suggests that MPA and performance quality co-develop during practice sessions, such that musicians who improve their playing are subsequently less anxious (18). Thus, MPA interventions ought to promote effective practice that produces optimal, deep learning at an early stage during performance preparation, and not merely aim to reduce anxiety only shortly before or during stage performance.
Music students have most commonly reported that increasing practice time is their main strategy to manage MPA, while developing specific practice techniques to address concerns such as potential memory slips (10) and difficult parts of the music (19). Notably, students have ascribed their performance experiences to their level of technical preparedness, which may directly impact their MPA. For instance, interviewed participants in Tahirbegi’s (10) study commented that “My anxiety depends on how secure I feel about the concerts, how well I know the pieces I play” and “I notice that if I am very well prepared, I don’t necessarily get that nervous”. Indeed, well-prepared performers may experience higher self-efficacy that facilitates their management of MPA. In turn, lower MPA mediates the positive effects of self-efficacy on self-rated performance quality (20). Conversely, more anxious musicians have reported less conviction in their ability to perform the task (i.e., lower self-efficacy) even with their anxiety under control than less anxious musicians (21). Thus, mastering the musical material and technical skills could boost self-efficacy, which has been found to be the most important predictor of music performance quality in evaluative exams (22).
Clearly, musicians are well-aware of the importance of good preparation for successful musical performance (23). However, the practice strategies that they use during their preparation may not always be the most effective. For instance, although increasing practice time is a strategy that musicians often use to cope with MPA (10) and that has been associated with lower self-reported MPA in some studies (e.g., 20, 24, 25), hours of practice alone do not necessarily predict better music performance quality (26, 27). Moreover, state anxiety has been associated with repetitive practice behaviors during longer practice sessions, which may increase the musician’s risk of developing injuries from overuse and repetitive strains (18). Adding insult to injury, mindless repetition and drill during practice may also have limited benefits for deep learning and performance quality (23, 28). Taken together, these findings point to the importance of practice quality for achieving musical mastery and managing MPA. How, then, should we practice for deep, durable learning?
Learning strategy #1: Deliberate practice
One potential strategy is deliberate practice, which involves structured, effortful practice activities that are specifically designed and tailored to improve one’s current level of performance, as characterized by: (a) repeated experiences in which the performer attends to the critical task elements, (b) focused attention, (c) intrinsic motivation to improve, and (d) corrective feedback and performance monitoring that enable gradual refinements (23). Many studies have since shown that deliberate practice is a necessary and important predictor of higher levels of music performance (e.g., 23, 29, 30; see 31 for a review), even if it may not be sufficient (32, 33). For instance, Platz et al.'s (34) meta-analysis of 13 studies found a mean effect size of r = 0.61 accounting for 36% of the variance in the relationship between task-relevant practice (including deliberate practice) and music performance (see also 32, 35, 36). Indeed, practice time has been shown to predict musical achievement only through formal practice that includes deliberate practice and self-regulation strategies, goal direction, and focused attention—when formal practice is controlled for, then practice time in fact negatively predicts musical achievement (37). This suggests that informal practice time, which includes improvisation, playing one’s favorite pieces by ear, and messing about with music, may not only be “empty” time, but could impede musical achievement.
Learning strategy #2: Retrieval practice
Another potential strategy is retrieval practice, a potent learning technique that decades of research have robustly shown fosters deep, durable learning (38, 39; see 40 for a review). Notably, retrieval practice yields reliable memories that are resilient to stress. In a study by Smith et al. (41), participants studied words and images either by restudying them or practicing retrieval (i.e., recalling as many items as they could after studying them). One day later, half of the participants underwent stress induction in which they were asked to give impromptu speeches and solve math problems in front of an audience. When participants were subsequently tested on their memory of the studied words and images, the retrieval practice group outperformed the restudying group. Importantly, stress impaired memory in the restudying group, but not in the retrieval practice group. In fact, stressed retrieval practice participants outperformed non-stressed restudying participants, and performed just as well as non-stressed retrieval practice participants. These findings suggest that stress does not always harm memory and performance. Rather, when strong memories are created during encoding by using effective techniques such as retrieval practice, these well-encoded memories are protected against stress. At the same time, retrieval practice reduces test anxiety. In a study of 1,408 middle and high school students, Agarwal et al. (42) found that 72% of students reported feeling less nervous for tests and exams for their classes that had implemented retrieval practice (e.g., via low-stakes practice quizzes administered via “clickers”). Presumably, when students engaged in retrieval practice, they learned the course material better and were thus less anxious about facing subsequent evaluative tests. In the context of music performance, practicing retrieval during performance preparation could be a powerful way to lower MPA, while enhancing learning and reducing memory failures during one’s actual performance even when anxious.
Barriers to implementing effective learning strategies
Although deliberate practice and retrieval practice are promising techniques for enhancing deep learning and managing MPA, their benefits may be constrained by suboptimal implementation. For instance, rote memorization (e.g., repeating the music until it can be played automatically by “feel”) is a common form of retrieval practice, especially for novice musicians (43, 44; see 45 for a review of memorization methods). After repeating short sections and playing them from memory without the music score, the musician may link or “chunk” these sections into longer sections, then repeat these longer sections and play them from memory, until the whole piece has presumably been memorized. In this way, retrieving each chunk cues the musician’s recall of the next chunk (46), in what is known as associative chaining (47) or serial position effects in recall (e.g., 48).
Yet, although some degree of automaticity is needed for efficient performance under pressure, procedural memory is unreliable and vulnerable to interference (44, 45, 49, 50). When memory fails during a music performance, serial cueing of recall is disrupted (51). Thus, if musicians relied only on rote memorization during their performance preparation, they may have no other recourse than muddling along, improvising or, worse still, restarting the piece if a memory lapse occurred on stage (46; see also 52).
In fact, expert performance has been conceptualized as a shift of cognitive control to higher-level strategic aspects of performance, rather than being eliminated entirely for full automaticity (53). That is, experts may be able to perform seemingly without thinking because they harness automatic control systems to think in music while sequencing the actions needed (54). For instance, expert musicians form performance cues based on the musical structure of a piece (55) to create memory that is “content addressable” (52). Such performance cues include: (a) structural cues representing section boundaries of the music (e.g., based on harmonic and melodic properties), (b) expressive cues representing the feelings to be conveyed to an audience, (c) interpretive cues representing critical interpretive decisions that need monitoring during the performance (e.g., decreasing the dynamics to prepare for a later crescendo), and (d) basic cues representing critical technique details such as fingering (55). In this way, the music’s structure provides a hierarchical retrieval scheme, while performance cues serve as landmarks in a mental map from which the musician can access specific content or locations to recover from a memory lapse, rather than having to restart from the beginning of the piece.
But even performance cues have limitations. Although the musician may be able to recover from a memory lapse by jumping forward and continuing from a performance cue, recall tends to be highest at the beginning of phrases starting with structural or expressive cues, then declines steadily across the rest of the phrase (50, 56). One interpretation is that structural and expressive cues provide content-addressable access to memory that is otherwise organized as an action sequence (i.e., in serial order). Thus, later bars in the sequence are recalled less well and memory failure becomes increasingly likely. In contrast, recall tends to be lower at basic cues then increases as serial distance from the cue increases, suggesting that basic cues do not provide direct content-addressable memory access but function as parts of serial associative chains. How, then, can we bolster content-addressable memory access?
Learning strategy #3: Non-serial practice
Through personal performance practice and experience, we observed the prowess of non-serial learning and practicing in breaking serial associative chains. Consider the excerpt from Chopin’s (57) first ballade (Figure 1). It is commonplace for bars 170 to 172 to form a serial associative chain so that, relative to bar 170, the content of bar 171 or 172 is less readily accessible. The retrievability of bar 171 often hinges heavily, if not wholly, on first executing bar 170 successfully; likewise, bar 172 relies on bar 171. Evidently, where a pianist fails to execute bar 170 successfully, bar 171 and, by extension, bar 172 also cannot be recovered. Indeed, such is the severe cost to basic cognitive systems that function in a serial recall manner. Consequently, we noticed one cannot successfully start performing a piece from just anywhere, but must do so from the piece’s outset or at best the beginning of a section. For a singer, one often cannot directly recall what words in a ballad rhyme with ee or even what happens in the last stanza, but has to in fact sing the ballad, listen for ee sounds and pay attention to the last stanza when one gets to it (52). Similarly, we observed that a pianist in performance often cannot directly pinpoint the exact notes that particular bars contain, and would have to “play to know” when one gets to each of those bars. Under this light, one ought to not practice bars 170 to 172 of Chopin’s ballade categorically. Toward dissolving serial associate chains, a pianist could, for instance, subdivide each bar into smaller halves and begin practicing each bar from its midpoint—from bar 170b to 171a; from bar 171b to 172a, thereby strengthening content-addressable memory access for optimizing stage performance. We encourage empirical investigations in systematically assessing the efficacy of non-serial practice, and welcome collaborations.
Figure 1. Excerpt from Chopin’s Ballade no. 1 in G minor, op. 23.
Conclusion
Music performance anxiety (MPA) negatively impacts musicians in almost every musical context imaginable. Yet, extant interventions do not remedy MPA at its core. Drawing on psychological science, performance-anxious musicians should not perform worse in high-stakes stressful situations than their preparation (practice) would otherwise allow. Instead, where musicians are well-prepared, performance anxiety per se should not interfere with stage performance accuracy and quality. Thus, rather than aim to reduce anxiety only shortly before or during stage performance, performance-anxiety interventions ought to promote effective (e.g., non-serial) practice and optimal learning at an early stage during performance preparation. We hope this paper will spur further dialogue about new pathways toward deeper musical learning and fuller onstage flourishing.
Author contributions
SL: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. ND: Writing – review & editing.
Funding
The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This work was supported by The 72nd Anniversary of His Majesty King Bhumibol Adulyadej Scholarship and The 90th Anniversary of Chulalongkorn University Fund (Ratchadapiseksomphot Endowment Fund) awarded to SL by Chulalongkorn University.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1. Kenny DT. The role of negative emotions in performance anxiety. In: Juslin PN and Sloboda JA, editors. Handbook of music and emotion: Theory, research, applications. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press (2010). p. 425–51. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199230143.003.0016
2. Barros S, Marinho H, Borges N, and Pereira A. Characteristics of music performance anxiety among undergraduate music students: A systematic review. Psychol Music. (2022) 50:2021–43. doi: 10.1177/03057356211066967
3. Fernholz I, Mumm JLM, Plag J, Noeres K, Rotter G, Willich SN, et al. Performance anxiety in professional musicians: A systematic review on prevalence, risk factors and clinical treatment effects. Psychol Med. (2019) 49:2287–306. doi: 10.1017/S0033291719001910
4. Herman R and Clark T. It’s not a virus! Reconceptualizing and de-pathologizing music performance anxiety. Front Psychol. (2023) 14:1194873. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1194873
5. Faur AL, Pintea S, Vaida S, and Opre AN. The efficacy of cognitive and behavioral interventions upon music performance anxiety: A meta-analysis. Psychol Music. (2023) 51:357–72. doi: 10.1177/03057356221115461
6. Kenny DT. A systematic review of treatments for music performance anxiety. Anxiety Stress Coping. (2005) 18:183–208. doi: 10.1080/10615800500167258
7. McGinnis AM and Milling LS. Psychological treatment of musical performance anxiety: Current status and future directions. Psychotherapy: Theory Research Practice Training. (2005) 42:357–73. doi: 10.1037/0033-3204.42.3.357
8. Spahn C. Treatment and prevention of music performance anxiety. Prog Brain Res. (2015) 217:129–140. doi: 10.1016/bs.pbr.2014.11.024
9. Wilson GD and Roland D. “Performance anxiety”. In Parncutt R and McPherson GE (Eds.). The science and psychology of music performance: Creative strategies for teaching and learning. Oxford University Press (2002) p. 47–61.
10. Tahirbegi D. Higher music education students’ experiences and management of performance anxiety: A qualitative study. Psychol Music. (2022) 50:1184–1196. doi: 10.1177/03057356211034573
11. Kruse-Weber S and Parncutt R. Error management for musicians: An interdisciplinary conceptual framework. Front Psychol. (2014) 5:777. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00777
12. Papageorgi I, Creech A, and Welch G. Perceived performance anxiety in advanced musicians specializing in different musical genres. Psychol Music. (2013) 41:18–41. doi: 10.1177/0305735611408995
13. Perdomo-Guevara E. Is music performance anxiety just an individual problem? Exploring the impact of musical environments on performers’ approaches to performance and emotions. Psychomusicology: Music Mind Brain. (2014) 24:66–74. doi: 10.1037/pmu0000028
14. Kenny DT and Osborne MS. Music performance anxiety: New insights from young musicians. Adv Cogn Psychol. (2006) 2:103–12. doi: 10.2478/v10053-008-0049-5
15. Pecen E, Collins D, and MacNamara ÁChecktae. Music of the night: Performance practitioner considerations for enhancement work in music. Sport Exercise Perform Psychol. (2016) 5:377–95. doi: 10.1037/spy0000067
16. Osborne MS, Kenny DT, and Cooksey J. Impact of a cognitive-behavioural treatment program on music performance anxiety in secondary school music students: A pilot study. Musicae Scientiae. (2007) 11:53–84. doi: 10.1177/10298649070110S204
17. Theobald M, Breitwieser J, and Brod G. Test anxiety does not predict exam performance when knowledge is controlled for: Strong evidence against the interference hypothesis of test anxiety. Psychol Sci. (2022) 33:2073–2083. doi: 10.1177/09567976221119391
18. Passarotto E, Worschech F, and Altenmüller E. The effects of anxiety on practice behaviors and performance quality in expert pianists. Front Psychol. (2023) 14:1152900. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1152900
19. Fehm L and Schmidt K. Performance anxiety in gifted adolescent musicians. J Anxiety Disord. (2006) 20:98–109. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2004.11.011
20. González A, Blanco-Piñeiro P, and Díaz-Pereira MP. Music performance anxiety: Exploring structural relations with self-efficacy, boost, and self-rated performance. Psychol Music. (2018) 46:831–47. doi: 10.1177/0305735617727822
21. Craske MG and Craig KD. Musical performance anxiety: The three-systems model and self-efficacy theory. Behav Res Ther. (1984) 22:267–80. doi: 10.1016/0005-7967(84)90007-X
22. McPherson GE and McCormick J. Self-efficacy and music performance. Psychol Music. (2006) 34:322–36. doi: 10.1177/0305735606064841
23. Ericsson KA, Krampe RT, and Tesch-Römer C. The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychol Rev. (1993) 100:363–406. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.100.3.363
24. Biasutti M and Concina E. The role of coping strategy and experience in predicting music performance anxiety. Musicae Scientiae. (2014) 18:189–202. doi: 10.1177/1029864914523282
25. Kenny DT, Fortune JM, and Ackermann B. Predictors of music performance anxiety during skilled performance in tertiary flute players. Psychol Music. (2013) 41:306–28. doi: 10.1177/0305735611425904
26. McCormick J and McPherson G. The role of self-efficacy in a musical performance examination: An exploratory structural equation analysis. Psychol Music. (2003) 31:37–50. doi: 10.1177/0305735603031001322
27. Williamon A and Valentine E. Quantity and quality of musical practice as predictors of performance quality. Br J Psychol. (2000) 91:353–376. doi: 10.1348/000712600161871
28. Lehmann AC and Ericsson KA. Research on expert performance and deliberate practice: Implications for the education of amateur musicians and music students. Psychomusicology: A J Res Music Cogn. (1997) 16:40–58. doi: 10.1037/h0094068
29. Bonneville-Roussy A, Lavigne GL, and Vallerand RJ. When passion leads to excellence: The case of musicians. Psychol Music. (2011) 39:123–138. doi: 10.1177/0305735609352441
30. Sloboda JA, Davidson JW, Howe MJA, and Moore DG. The role of practice in the development of performing musicians. Br J Psychol. (1996) 87:287–309. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1996.tb02591.x
31. Lehmann AC, Gruber H, and Kopiez R. Expertise in music. In: Ericsson KA, Hoffman RR, Kozbelt A, and Williams AM, editors. The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance, 2nd ed. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press (2018). p. 535–549. doi: 10.1017/9781316480748.028
32. Hambrick DZ, Oswald FL, Altmann EM, Meinz EJ, Gobet F, and Campitelli G. Deliberate practice: Is that all it takes to become an expert? Intelligence. (2014) 45:34–45. doi: 10.1016/j.intell.2013.04.001
33. Meinz EJ and Hambrick DZ. Deliberate practice is necessary but not sufficient to explain individual differences in piano sight-reading skill: The role of working memory capacity. Psychol Sci. (2010) 21:914–9. doi: 10.1177/0956797610373933
34. Platz F, Kopiez R, Lehmann AC, and Wolf A. The influence of deliberate practice on musical achievement: A meta-analysis. Front Psychol. (2014) 5:646. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00646
35. Ericsson KA and Harwell KW. Deliberate practice and proposed limits on the effects of practice on the acquisition of expert performance: Why the original definition matters and recommendations for future research. Front Psychol. (2019) 10:2396. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02396
36. Macnamara BN, Hambrick DZ, and Oswald FL. Deliberate practice and performance in music, games, sports, education, and professions: A meta-analysis. Psychol Sci. (2014) 25:1608–18. doi: 10.1177/0956797614535810
37. Bonneville-Roussy A and Bouffard T. When quantity is not enough: Disentangling the roles of practice time, self-regulation and deliberate practice in musical achievement. Psychol Music. (2015) 43:686–704. doi: 10.1177/0305735614534910
38. Roediger HL III and Karpicke JD. Test-enhanced learning: Taking memory tests improves long-term retention. Psychol Sci. (2006) 17:249–55. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01693.x
39. Roediger HL III and Karpicke JD. The power of testing memory: Basic research and implications for educational practice. Perspect Psychol Sci. (2006) 1:181–210. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00012.x
40. Karpicke JD. “Retrieval-based learning”. In: Wixted J, editor. Learning and memory: A comprehensive reference, 3rd edition. UK: Elsevier (2025). vol. 4, p. 411–441. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-443-15754-7.00074-2
41. Smith AM, Floerke VA, and Thomas AK. Retrieval practice protects memory against acute stress. Science. (2016) 354:1046–1048. doi: 10.1126/science.aah5067
42. Agarwal PK, D’Antonio L, Roediger HL III, McDermott KB, and McDaniel MA. Classroom-based programs of retrieval practice reduce middle school and high school students’ test anxiety. J Appl Res Memory Cogn. (2014) 3:131–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jarmac.2014.07.002
43. Hallam S. The development of memorisation strategies in musicians: Implications for education. Br J Music Educ. (1997) 14:87–97. doi: 10.1017/S0265051700003466
44. Williamon A. Strategies for memorizing music. In Williamon A (Ed.), Musical excellence: Strategies and techniques to enhance performance. New York, USA: Oxford University Press (2004) p. 123–142. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198525356.003.0007
45. Mishra J. A century of memorization pedagogy. J Historical Res Music Educ. (2010) 32:3–18. doi: 10.1177/153660061003200102
46. Chaffin R. Learning Clair de Lune: Retrieval practice and expert memorization. Music Percept. (2007) 24:377–93. doi: 10.1525/mp.2007.24.4.377
47. Ebbinghaus H. On memory: A contribution to experimental psychology. (1885/1913) New York, USA: Teachers College, Columbia University.
48. Roediger HL III and Crowder RG. A serial position effect in recall of United States presidents. Bull Psychonomic Soc. (1976) 8:275–8. doi: 10.3758/BF03335138
49. Beilock SL and Carr TH. On the fragility of skilled performance: What governs choking under pressure? J Exp Psychology: Gen. (2001) 130:701–25. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.130.4.701
50. Lisboa T, Demos AP, and Chaffin R. Training thought and action for virtuoso performance. Musicae Scientiae. (2018) 22:519–38. doi: 10.1177/1029864918782350
51. Chaffin R, Ginsborg J, Dixon J, and Demos AP. Recovery from memory failure when recalling a memorized performance: The role of musical structure and performance cues. Musicae Scientiae. (2023) 27:94–116. doi: 10.1177/10298649211025491
52. Rubin DC. The basic-systems model of episodic memory. Perspect Psychol Sci. (2006) 1:277–311. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00017.x
53. Christensen W, Sutton J, and McIlwain DJF. Cognition in skilled action: Meshed control and the varieties of skill experience. Mind Lang. (2016) 31:37–66. doi: 10.1111/mila.12094
54. Logan GD. Automatic control: How experts act without thinking. Psychol Rev. (2018) 125:453–85. doi: 10.1037/rev0000100
55. Chaffin R and Imreh G. Practicing perfection: Piano performance as expert memory. Psychol Sci. (2002) 13:342–9. doi: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2002.00462.x
56. Chaffin R, Lisboa T, Logan T, and Begosh KT. Preparing for memorized cello performance: The role of performance cues. Psychol Music. (2010) 38:3–30. doi: 10.1177/0305735608100377
Keywords: music performance anxiety, performance science, performance practice, psychological science, music cognition, music education
Citation: Lim S and Dhamabutra N (2025) Music performance anxiety: Insights from psychological science. Front. Psychiatry 16:1675660. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1675660
Received: 08 August 2025; Accepted: 24 September 2025;
Published: 24 October 2025.
Edited by:
Michiko Yoshie, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), JapanReviewed by:
Zelia Chueke, UMR8223 Institut de recherche en Musicologie (IReMus), FranceCopyright © 2025 Lim and Dhamabutra. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Stephen Lim, c3RlcGhlbi5sLmNodWxhQGdtYWlsLmNvbQ==; Narongrit Dhamabutra, bmFyb25ncml0LmRAZ21haWwuY29t