Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Psychiatry

Sec. Public Mental Health

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1679862

This article is part of the Research TopicYouth Mental HealthView all 12 articles

Analysis of Trainee Responses in Multidisciplinary Training for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry: From Silos to Synergy

Provisionally accepted
Masahide  UsamiMasahide Usami1*Yuki  MizumotoYuki Mizumoto1Kotoe  ItagakiKotoe Itagaki1Keita  YamamotoKeita Yamamoto1Kozo  OhchoKozo Ohcho2Masahiro  FukudaMasahiro Fukuda2Ayaka  TaniguchiAyaka Taniguchi2Masakage  OkunoMasakage Okuno3Noa  TsujiiNoa Tsujii4Yuzuru  HaradaYuzuru Harada5Takashi  NagasawaTakashi Nagasawa6Kazuhiko  SaitoKazuhiko Saito7
  • 1Japan Insititute for Health Security National Kohnodai Medical Center, Ichikawa, Japan
  • 2Okayama Psychiatric Medical Center, Okayama, Japan
  • 3Mikuni-hill Mental Clinic, Mikuni-hill Hospital, Sakai, Japan
  • 4Toyama Daigaku Fuzoku Byoin, Toyama, Japan
  • 5Nagano Kenritsu Kokorono Iryo Center Komagane, Komagane, Japan
  • 6Tokyo Toritsu Shoni Sogo Iryo Center, Fuchu, Japan
  • 7Aiiku Kenkyujo, Minato, Japan

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Introduction: Japan is experiencing a growing demand for child and adolescent mental health services owing to the increasing rates of school refusal, youth suicide, and neurodevelopmental disorders. However, there is a critical shortage of trained professionals as well as limited national efforts to provide multidisciplinary training. Methods: We evaluated a government-funded training program aimed at enhancing collaboration between clinical, educational, and psychosocial professionals in child psychiatry. A total of 426 participants completed post-training surveys assessing the perceived usefulness of 22 lecture modules (rated 0–10), overall satisfaction (rated 0– 10), and open-ended feedback on the curriculum design. An exploratory factor analysis was conducted to identify the latent domains among the modules. Net promoter scores (NPSs) were calculated for each module to gauge the perceived value. Ordinary least-squares regression was used to identify the predictors of overall satisfaction. Results: Four content domains were identified: foundational knowledge, therapeutic skills, problem behavior management, and multidisciplinary collaboration. The mean satisfaction score was 4.6/5. The modules with the highest NPS were team-based care and practical case-based learning. Participants with educational and psychosocial roles reported significantly higher satisfaction than clinical staff. The regression analysis revealed that therapeutic skills and collaboration were significant predictors of overall satisfaction. Conclusion: Multidisciplinary training programs are feasible and well-received in Japan. The participants prioritized interactive, role-based learning and emphasized the need for content tailored to real-world teamwork. These findings could inform future curriculum development and workforce policies in child and adolescent psychiatry.

Keywords: Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, multidisciplinary training, interprofessionaleducation, Net promoter score, Educational program evaluation, factor analysis, Japan

Received: 05 Aug 2025; Accepted: 20 Oct 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Usami, Mizumoto, Itagaki, Yamamoto, Ohcho, Fukuda, Taniguchi, Okuno, Tsujii, Harada, Nagasawa and Saito. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Masahide Usami, usami.m@jihs.go.jp

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.