ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Psychiatry
Sec. Psychological Therapy and Psychosomatics
This article is part of the Research TopicInnovations in Psychological Care for Oncology and Palliative Settings: A Holistic ApproachView all 17 articles
Barriers and Facilitators of Psychosocial Service Provision for Patients with Cancer across Six Hospitals in Ethiopia: A Qualitative Study
Provisionally accepted- 1Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
- 2Global Health Working Group, Institute of Medical Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Informatics, Martin-Luther University, Halle(Saale), Germany
- 3Clinton Health Access Initiative, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
- 4Department of Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
- 5Department of Gynecology, Martin-Luther-University, Halle (Saale), Germany
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: While psychosocial services are known to improve treatment adherence and quality of life for cancer patients by mitigating anxiety and depression, evidence from Ethiopia is limited. A recent trial introduced integrated psychosocial interventions, including counseling, group discussions, educational materials, and home visits, into routine care. The present study explores barriers and facilitators affecting psychosocial service provision in selected Ethiopian hospitals. Method: A qualitative study was conducted at six hospitals across four regions of Ethiopia, where psychosocial support had been introduced and provided to patients with cancer. Data were collected through in-depth interviews (IDIs) and focus group discussions (FGDs) with patients diagnosed with breast, cervical, or colorectal cancer; as well as key informant interviews (KIIs) with healthcare professionals, including oncologists, gynecologists, surgeons, nurses, and health extension workers. All interviews were transcribed, translated and reviewed for completeness. To enhance data familiarity, transcripts and audio recordings were reviewed multiple times. NVivo software was used for data management and organization. Data was coded inductively, followed by thematic analysis to identify key patterns and insights. Result: Barriers to psychosocial support (PSS) in cancer care include limited awareness of its importance, as treatment is often considered to be purely medical. Although home visits are common in maternal health, in cancer care, they face resistance due to unfamiliarity. Disclosure challenges also persist, with providers avoiding sensitive conversations, leaving patients under-informed. Hospital leadership tends to prioritize physical care over PSS. However, survivor stories enhance patient reassurance and openness; travel reimbursements and refreshments facilitate patient participation and communication, and routine supervision of PSS activities supports provider effectiveness in PSS provision. Conclusion: Integrating PSS into routine cancer care requires a shift in the mindset of patients, providers, and leadership, recognizing PSS as an essential component of comprehensive cancer care. Raising awareness about home visits and strengthening provider skills through targeted training on disclosure can improve patient engagement and quality of care.
Keywords: Cancer, Psychosocial support, barriers, Facilitators, integration and routine care
Received: 20 Aug 2025; Accepted: 27 Oct 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Belay, Ware, Kaba, Addissie, Kantelhardt and Wondimagegnehu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Eva Johanna Kantelhardt, eva.kantelhardt@uk-halle.de
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
