PERSPECTIVE article
Front. Psychiatry
Sec. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Rehabilitation
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1694605
This article is part of the Research TopicRestrictive Practices, Stigma, and Health Inequalities for Women with Mental Health Problems, Learning Disabilities, Autism, and Other Psychosocial DisabilitiesView all articles
Manufacturing a Monster: an autoethnographic analysis of enforced isolation, objectification and the destruction of Self
Provisionally accepted- Restraint Reduction Network, London, United Kingdom
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Introduction: This perspective article examines the impact of enforced isolation on the authors sense of Self. The research explores how systemic objectification and the blocking of vital "mirroring" within seclusion and long-term segregation (LTS) in psychiatric hospitals in England can lead to the erosion of Self. The paper posits that enforced isolation is not therapeutic, but a destructive intervention rooted in neuronormative ideology that ultimately escalates distress, prolonging detention. Methods: The autoethnographic perspective offers a qualitative understanding of experience to examine the phenomena of isolation and trauma. The reflexive analysis is rooted in the author's lived experiences of repeated and enduring exposure to seclusion and LTS. Results: Enforced isolation eroded the author's Self due to systemic objectification and a lack of positive "mirroring". Consequently, the Self could only be sustained through perverse connections with staff e.g., shared negative emotions such as fear, aggression and hate. With a Self-reconfigured around negative affect, the lines are blurred between intimacy and aggression, resulting in shattering implications for the author's ability to have relationships and love. Discussion: Enforced isolation is positioned as a destructive intervention, manufacturing rather than containing, distress. This perspective reframes isolation from a clinical tool to a harmful practice, contradicting therapeutic goals. Aligning with wider research, the paper calls for a transformative shift towards rights-based, relational models, such as HOPE(S), that prioritize human connection to prevent iatrogenic harm.
Keywords: enforced isolation, Autoethnography, objectification, autism, Trauma, Therapeutic relationships, Human Rights, psychiatric care
Received: 28 Aug 2025; Accepted: 13 Oct 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Quinn. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Alexis Quinn, a.quinn@restraintreductionnetwork.org
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.