Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Psychiatry

Sec. Public Mental Health

This article is part of the Research TopicShaping Mental Health Care: Policies, Cultural Values, and Community-Based TransformationsView all articles

Social Attitudes toward Tongqi among the General Public and Associated Determinants: A Mixed-Methods Study in Hubei Province, China

Provisionally accepted
Fen  YangFen Yang1,2,3Yake  YueYake Yue1Mengjie  TongMengjie Tong1Yufei  QiuYufei Qiu1Jiali  LiuJiali Liu1Lijuan  ZengLijuan Zeng1Juan  GuJuan Gu1*Yu  YiqingYu Yiqing4
  • 1Hubei University of Chinese Medicine, Wuhan, China
  • 2Hubei Shizhen Laboratory, Wuhan, China
  • 3Affiliated Hospital of Hubei University of Chinese Medicine, Wuhan, China
  • 4Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: In China, "Tongqi" (wives of men who have sex with men) remain a socially marginalized group. Public awareness and understanding of Tongqi are limited. Misconceptions and stigma persist, potentially hindering their access to social support and equitable treatment. However, empirical research in China on the general public's attitudes toward Tongqi and the factors shaping these views remains scarce. This study aimed to investigate the general public's social attitudes toward Tongqi and the factors influencing these attitudes. Methods: An explanatory sequential mixed-methods design was employed in Hubei Province, China, in 2024. The quantitative phase involved a structured survey of 587 participants, while the qualitative phase included in-depth interviews with 20 individuals from diverse social backgrounds. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, independent samples t-tests, one-way ANOVA and multiple linear regression. Qualitative data were thematically analyzed using NVivo 14. Results: The mean score of social attitudes toward Tongqi was 89.93 (SD = 16.60), indicating a moderately neutral stance. Social attitude scores were significantly associated with gender (β = 5.39, P < 0.001), education (β = 3.37, P < 0.05), marital status (β = -3.45, P < 0.001), occupational status (β = 3.99, P < 0.05), perceptions of the current social environment (β = -4.83, P < 0.001) and sexual orientation (β = 5.66, P < 0.01). Qualitative analysis revealed three key themes: (1) Cognitive aspect—awareness shaped by traditional and societal norms; (2) Affective aspect—public empathy and emotional orientation toward Tongqi; (3) Behavior aspect—expressed needs and public expectations for support mechanisms. Conclusion: The general public holds moderately neutral social attitudes toward Tongqi, influenced by multiple factors. Deep-rooted stigma, driven by conservative views on marriage and sexuality, continues to marginalize this group. Although emotional sympathy exists, the absence of public visibility and structural support limits meaningful social action. Future research should expand to diverse populations and sociocultural settings to inform targeted interventions. Multisectoral engagement is urgently needed to enhance awareness, reduce stigma, and establish comprehensive support systems for Tongqi.

Keywords: tongqi, Wives of gay men, Men who have sex with men, Social attitudes, China

Received: 06 Sep 2025; Accepted: 04 Nov 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Yang, Yue, Tong, Qiu, Liu, Zeng, Gu and Yiqing. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Juan Gu, 2431100875@stmail.hbucm.edu.cn

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.