- 1College of Sports Science, Jishou University, Jishou, Hunan, China
- 2School of Physical & Health Sciences, Guangxi Science & Technology Normal University, Laibin, Guangxi, China
- 3Physical Education Department, Beijing Wuzi University, Beijing, China
Background: Adolescents or young adults’ physical and mental health, along with their academic performance, are negatively impacted by Internet addiction (IA), with such behavior being associated with the onset of cognitive and mental health disorders. Consequently, this issue has emerged as a pressing global social problem that demands urgent resolution.
Objective: This research employed a meta-analytic approach to systematically assess the efficacy of diverse exercise-based interventions in mitigating IA among university students. The primary objective was to determine optimal therapeutic exercise modalities and formulate evidence-based guidelines for subsequent intervention strategies targeting adolescent internet overuse.
Methods: A comprehensive systematic literature search was conducted across multiple international and domestic databases, including Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, China Knowledge, and Wanfang. Methodological quality was evaluated utilizing the revised Cochrane Risk of Bias tool for randomized trials. Subsequently, both conventional and network meta-analyses were performed employing Review Manager 5.3 and Stata 14.0 statistical software packages.
Results: Traditional meta-results showed that exercise intervention was better than the control group in improving adolescent IA (SMD= -2.33, 95%CI -3.00, -1.66). Network meta-analysis(NMA) showed that Combined movement (CM) improved adolescent IA better than Control group (CG) (SMD-3.47, 95% -4.85, -2.10), and CM had the highest probability of being the best intervention for IA (SUCRA = 86.7%).
Conclusion: Exercise-based interventions demonstrate significant therapeutic efficacy in addressing IA, with CM exhibiting superior effectiveness for adolescent populations. Nevertheless, given the methodological limitations imposed by restricted sample sizes and heterogeneous literature quality, future large-scale randomized controlled trials are warranted to validate these preliminary findings.
Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD420251006694.
1 Introduction
The Statistical Report on China’s Internet Development (2022) reveals a national internet user base of 1.067 billion by December 2022, reflecting a year-on-year growth of 35.49 million users from 2021 figures. This expansion corresponds to an internet penetration rate of 75.6% across the country’s population (1). While the Internet significantly enhances efficiency in both daily life and professional domains, excessive reliance on digital connectivity may precipitate the onset of Internet Addiction (IA). IA, clinically recognized as a behavioral addiction, manifests through compulsive online engagement and impaired impulse control independent of substance influence (2). This condition demonstrates core addictive characteristics, including compulsive use patterns, diminished self-regulation, and withdrawal difficulties. Furthermore, IA adversely affects academic performance while increasing risks of delinquency and self-harm, necessitating urgent multidisciplinary intervention from families, educators, and policymakers (3).
Therapeutic approaches for IA primarily encompass psychological interventions, pharmacological treatments, and clinical management. However, affected adolescents or young adults frequently exhibit treatment non-compliance due to social stigma and psychological reactance, often resulting in premature discontinuation. This treatment attrition stems from inherent limitations of conventional modalities, including protracted duration, substantial financial burdens, and significant adverse effects (4). It has been found that sports can effectively reduce IA behavior by repairing structural brain damage, improving brain functional connectivity, and bi-directionally modulating dopamine and its receptors (5). Physical exercise, recognized for its low cost, widespread popularity, and high compliance, has been demonstrated to be a highly effective and significant intervention in the treatment of both substance and behavioral addiction. Gao (6) and Zhang (7) found in their research that exercise intervention can effectively improve IA in teenagers. This study demonstrates that competitive team sports, such as football and basketball, through their inherently engaging and enjoyable nature, effectively improve feelings of accomplishment, social belonging, and interpersonal competence in adolescents or young adults with IA while simultaneously mitigating the severity of addiction (8, 9). Zhang (10) et al.’s 12-week physical exercise intervention (jogging, basketball, and outdoor training) significantly reduced IA levels among college students. Zhang (11) found in his research that Tai Chi can significantly reduce the IA of college students. In the study, Xiao (12) discovered that a short-term basketball intervention yielded superior results compared to the Baduanjin intervention in alleviating symptoms and enhancing the mental well-being of mobile phone addicts. Despite direct comparisons being made between Tai Chi (11), basketball (10), and Baduanjin (10), indirect comparisons among specific sports are still lacking. Therefore, the most effective sports for addressing IA in teenagers remain unclear.
Network meta-analysis (NMA) has gained prominence in evaluating medical interventions due to its capacity to estimate the relative effectiveness and ranking of interventions, even in the absence of direct comparisons (13). In a NMA of 11 interventions, Zhou (14) and Zhang (15) found that exercise may be the most appropriate single intervention for reducing adolescent IA. However, it remained unclear which type of exercise intervention was most effective. Therefore, this study examined the effects of exercise interventions on adolescent IA, incorporating a detailed classification of exercise modalities, to identify the optimal intervention for reducing IA in this population. This research aims to guide adolescents or young adults with IA in choosing the most effective exercise regimen, reduce severe IA among youths, and promote healthier lifestyles.
2 Methods
This study was reported per the PRISMA NMA guidelines (16). The review protocol was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Review (PROSPERO) (CRD420251006694).
2.1 Search strategy
The computer searched PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, and other databases, and the search period was established until February 22, 2025. The search takes the way of combining subject words and free words. The search strategy uses Pubmed as an example, as shown in Appendix 1.
2.2 Study selection
The inclusion criteria for study selection were based on the PICOS methodology (Participants, interventions, comparators, outcomes, and study design) (16), shown in Table 1.
2.2 Data extraction
Two independent reviewers extracted the following data: first author, publication year, country of origin, sample size, intervention method, duration of intervention, and intervention period. The data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (mean ± SD). In cases where multiple time points for the outcome measures are reported, data from the most recent time point were extracted.
2.3 Risk of bias assessment
The risk of bias was independently evaluated by two reviewers, with a third reviewer involved in the assessment, utilizing the tools recommended by the Cochrane Collaboration (21). These tools included criteria such as sequence generation, concealment of allocation, blinding, incomplete outcome data, selective reporting of results, and other potential sources of bias. Each criterion was classified as having a low, unclear, or high risk of bias.
2.4 Data analysis
Meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.3 software. The mean difference (MD) was employed as the effect size for continuous data, and the effect sizes of both the experimental and control groups were pooled using a random-effects model. A 95% confidence interval (95% CI) was provided for each effect size. The heterogeneity of effect sizes across studies was quantitatively assessed using the I² statistic. A threshold of I² > 50% or a p-value ≤ 0.10 for the Q test was considered indicative of significant heterogeneity (21). In the presence of substantial heterogeneity, a random-effects model was applied, whereas a fixed-effects model was used when heterogeneity was minimal. Subgroup analyses were performed based on the characteristics of the interventions and populations. Sensitivity analysis was conducted to identify the source of heterogeneity in studies exhibiting substantial variability, testing whether any individual study contributed significantly to the observed heterogeneity.
NMA was also conducted to perform a random-effects multivariate NMA for pooled estimates within the frequentist framework (22). The network structure was visually represented in a network plot, where the connections between nodes indicated direct head-to-head comparisons of interventions. The size of each node and the thickness of the lines connecting them were proportional to the number of studies included. A network contribution graph was generated to assess the contribution of each direct comparison. To examine discrepancies between direct and indirect comparisons, loop-specific heterogeneity estimates, an inconsistency model, and node-splitting analysis were applied. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) was utilized to rank and compare the effectiveness of different interventions. SUCRA values range from 0 to 100, with a value of 100 signifying the optimal treatment with no uncertainty, and a value of 0 indicating the least effective treatment without uncertainty (23). Moreover, a network funnel plot was generated to check for publication bias.
3 Results
3.1 Study selection
After deleting duplicates, 2013 records were retrieved, 257 duplicates were removed, 1730 articles with inconsistent titles were deleted (This process was carried out by two independent reviewers who used the Endnote software. Any differences among the reviewers shall be resolved through discussion. If necessary, they may be negotiated with a third senior researcher), 11 articles with inconsistent titles were removed after reading the full text, and 15 articles were finally included. The research flow chart is shown in Figure 1.
3.2 Basic information included in the study
As shown in Table 2, the 15 included studies included 920 adolescents or young adults with IA. For outcome measures, five studies used CIAS-R to assess the severity of IA; eight studies used YIAS, with one item each for MPAI and SAS-SV. Ten studies were published before 2020, and five were published after 2020.
3.3 Methodological quality assessment
The methodological quality of the 15 included articles was assessed. Studies with no high risk and only three or fewer studies rated as ambiguous risk were classified as low risk. There was one high-risk point or five high-risk points, but four or more were rated as risky and not explicitly classified as medium-risk points. All the other conditions were classified as high-risk points (24). The summary of the bias risk assessment is shown in Figure 2.
3.4 Meta-analysis
Effect of exercise measures compared with the control group. A meta-analysis of 15 studies was performed. The overall results are shown in Figure 3. Compared with the control group, the exercise intervention significantly reduced adolescent IA [SMD= -2.33, 95%CI (-3.00, -1.66), p < 0.001], and I2 showed significant heterogeneity (I2 = 93%, p < 0.001).
3.4.1 Subgroup analysis
To further investigate the sources of heterogeneity, we performed a meta-regression using Stata 15 (Appendix 4). Subsequently, sensitivity analyses were conducted using RevMan 5.3; however, the heterogeneity (I²) remained above 50% even after applying the leave-one-out method. We therefore proceeded with a series of subgroup analyses based on sample size, exercise type, outcome measurement, intervention duration, publication year, and exercise frequency. The results of these analyses are presented in Table 3.
Table 3. Subgroup analysis to assess the effect of interventions on adolescents or young adults ‘ intervention addiction.
3.4.2 Sensitivity analysis
Sensitivity analysis of the included literature showed that no single study changed the overall outcome.
3.4.3 Publication bias
The funnel plot showed potential publication bias (Figure 4). The collective results indicated that potential publication bias did not significantly affect the results of this meta-analysis.
3.5 Network meta-analysis
To examine the differences in effects among the different interventions, network meta-analyses were further performed.
3.5.1 Network diagram
As shown in Figure 5, the dots in the figure represent the number of subjects in each group; the larger the dots are, the larger the sample size of the subjects. The lines connecting the dots represent the number of original studies directly compared in pairs; the thicker the lines are, the more original studies there are.
Figure 5. Node Size: The size of each node is now proportional to the total number of participants assigned to that intervention arm. Edge Width: The thickness of the connecting lines (edges) is now proportional to the number of studies contributing to that direct comparison. Color Scheme: A clear color scheme is used to distinguish different types of interventions (CM is yellow, FE is green, OE is pink, RE is orange, BDJ is purple, BE is brown, and CE is black). Network diagram of IA. Tai Chi (TC), Baduanjin (BDJ), Other exercise (OE), Running exercise (RE), Cycling exercise (CE), Combined movement (CM), Basketball exercise (BE), Football exercise (FE), Control group (CG).
3.5.2 Inconsistency of the network
The global inconsistency test revealed p = 0.5567 > 0.05, which can be analyzed for consistency. The local inconsistency test for each closed-loop result using the node-splitting method showed that the p-value of all interventions was >0.05, indicating that the consistency of each closed loop was improved and that the direct and indirect comparisons met the reticulated meta-analysis’s consistency (Appendix 2).
3.5.3 Contribution plot
The contributions of direct and indirect comparisons to network meta-analysis and the number of studies of each direct comparison are shown in Figure 6.
Figure 6. Contribution plot. Baduanjin (BDJ), Basketball exercise (BE), Cycling exercise (CE), Control group (CG), Combined movement (CM), Football exercise (FE), Other exercise (OE), Running exercise (RE), Tai Chi (TC).
3.5.4 Results of network meta-analysis
The network meta-analysis showed that CM was significantly better than CG (SMD-3.47, 95% -4.85, -2.10), as shown in Figure 7. Forest plots of eligible comparisons are shown in Figure 8.
3.5.5 Intervention effect ranking
The SUCRA probability of each intervention in the network is shown in Appendix 3. The SUCRA value (Table 4) is the probability that each intervention is among the best of those in the network, with larger values representing higher-ranking probabilities.
3.5.6 Risk of bias across studies
The publication bias was illustrated by funnel plots (Figure 9). According to the network meta-analysis, the funnel plot showed slight asymmetry.
4 Discussion
The study included 2013 randomized controlled studies from seven databases. To assess the effects of interventions versus treatment controls, a traditional meta-analysis of 15 studies was performed. In addition, a network meta-analysis of 9 different exercise interventions in 15 studies was conducted to analyze the direct and indirect comparisons between different exercise measures.
4.1 Meta-analysis
We conducted a meta-analysis of 15 randomized controlled trials to assess the impact of exercise interventions on IA. The results showed that the exercise intervention had a significant effect on reducing the total score of IA compared with the untreated control group. Total amount effect for [SMD= -2.33, 95%CI (-3.00, -1.66)]. This result is similar to that of Wu (38). Physical activity can enhance regional cerebral blood flow and accelerate metabolic processes, thereby improving the efficiency of cognitive processing in the brain. It facilitates the rapid retrieval of relevant information, reduces external distractions, and supports effective decision-making in adolescents or young adults with IA, ultimately enhancing cognitive function (4). Research on substance dependence has demonstrated that physical exercise can enhance the precise identification of addiction-related stimuli in the initial stages. It helps redirect the attention of individuals with addiction, minimizing cognitive conflict and resource depletion, while also reducing attentional bias towards addiction-related cues (39). In addition, sports can improve the top-down inhibitory control ability of the prefrontal cortex, reduce the psychological craving of people with addiction (40), promote the rational allocation of attention resources in the brain of adolescents or young adults in IA, improve the cognitive processing function in the early stage, and improve the attention bias to addiction-related cues. Furthermore, we performed a subgroup analysis of the findings based on factors such as sample size, assessment tools, intervention duration, intervention frequency, and scale. Given the considerable heterogeneity among the studies, the results should be regarded as preliminary.
4.2 Network meta-analysis
On this basis, the network meta-analysis was carried out further to analyze the matched intervention effect of each exercise intervention, and the intervention measures were ranked.
Our results found that CM was superior to the control group in reducing IA among adolescents or young adults. A single way of exercise may make teenagers feel bored and prone to boredom. “Exercise +” combined intervention has become a new trend in the treatment of IA. Compared with a single intervention, combined exercise is more helpful in alleviating the severity and mental symptoms of adolescents or young adults with IA and effectively improves the withdrawal rate of IA (4). The mechanism of action may be that combined intervention has a superposition effect or complementary effect on the treatment of adolescents or young adults with IA. In addition, the diversified types of sports in joint sports can help Internet addicts find the most suitable activities for their different needs. This approach can stimulate interest, reduce monotony, enhance participants’ motivation, and ultimately help reduce IA among adolescents or young adults. Different exercise modalities create varied rewards, thereby preventing tolerance development from repetitive routines (41). Furthermore, studies have found that CM activate the brain’s reward circuitry and directly regulate dopamine signaling (42). This process generates physiological pleasure and a sense of excitement (43), which can, to some extent, substitute for the reward stimulation derived from addictive behaviors. Consequently, the reinforcing effects of internet-based stimuli are weakened, thereby reducing cravings for IA among adolescents and young adults.
4.3 Strengths and limitations
As China is the most populous country in the world, IA poses a significant challenge to society and public health. Finding an effective strategy to solve this problem remains an urgent issue. In our research, we further verified that exercise is an effective measure to reduce IA, and through further exploration by NMA, it was discovered CM is the best movement for reducing IA among teenagers. However, our research still has some limitations: all the studies we included were from China, and the inferences drawn from the results should be conducted with caution. Previous studies have shown that the intensity of exercise plays a crucial role in reducing IA among teenagers (44–46). In our study, the reported exercise intensity was either moderate or not reported at all. Furthermore, our research produced an interesting finding: only CM had a statistically significant advantage over CG, while no significant differences were observed in other movement interventions. This might be due to the fact that the number of included studies is relatively small compared with other exercise methods. The ranking of exercise interventions is based on the average SUCRA score, which does not mean that the higher-ranked intervention measures are statistically superior to the lower-ranked ones. Therefore, the research results should be interpreted with caution. Our research classified different types of sports, yet we did not categorize them based on the types of sports interactions. In view of the above limitations, we suggest that in the future, sports interactions can be classified according to their types (for example, team, pair, and individual sports). In the research, more attention should be paid to the intensity of exercise, a wider range of exercise methods should be included, and a more rigorous experimental design should be adopted to gain deeper insights. The included studies in our analysis utilized different measurement instruments. Although we have identified partial sources of heterogeneity through meta-regression and subgroup analyses, variations in assessment tools may still exert a potential influence on the results. We recommend that future research adopt more standardized inclusion criteria and rigorously validated measurement tools to further verify the findings of this study.
5 Conclusion
Our findings demonstrate that all exercise interventions examined in this study significantly reduced IA. Based on the network meta-analysis results, combined exercise may be the best intervention. Future research will expand the scope of exercise interventions to incorporate diverse modalities (e.g., aerobics, badminton, combat gymnastics, and diving) to establish an evidence-based framework for optimal intervention selection. However, it is worth noting that the best exercise methods we have identified are based on the results of our statistical analysis. In actual intervention, comprehensive considerations should be made to select the most personalized exercise intervention methods to improve IA among adolescents or young adults.
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
Author contributions
YL: Conceptualization, Formal Analysis, Methodology, Software, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. SZ: Conceptualization, Formal Analysis, Software, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. LL: Funding acquisition, Resources, Software, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.
Funding
The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This research was supported by the R&D Program of Beijing Municipal Education Commission (SM202310037008) and “Physical Activity and Mental Health Research Center” at Guangxi Science & Technology Normal University (No. GXKSKYPT2025003).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1713076/full#supplementary-material
References
1. Center CINI. The 51st Statistical Report on Internet Development in China. China Internet Network Information Center (2023).
2. Li W, O’Brien JE, Snyder SM, and Howard MO. Diagnostic criteria for problematic internet use among U.S. University students: A mixed-methods evaluation. PloS One. (2016) 11:e0145981. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145981
3. Qi L, Yue Q, Tamochien, Kan Z, and Xun L. Neural mechanisms of reward system and cognitive control system in Internet addicts. Prog Biochem Biophysics. (2015) 42:32–40. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1206.2014.00023
4. Peisheng M, Zhongliang X, Ling L, and Yang L. Mechanisms, effects and strategies of exercise intervention on adolescents with internet addiction. J Shenyang Sport Univ. (2022) 41:50–6.
5. Sarı S and Karagün E. The effect of sports on children’s internet addiction, optimism and communication skills. Int J Appl Exercise Physiol. (2020) 9:157–66.
6. Gao W, Zhou H, Zou X, Li M, and Lin X. The impact of exercise and exercise-based combined therapies on adolescent internet addiction: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Curr Psychol. (2025) 44:7095–110. doi: 10.1007/s12144-025-07719-w
7. Zhang Y, Li G, Liu C, Chen H, Guo J, and Shi Z. Mixed comparison of interventions for different exercise types on students with Internet addiction: a network meta-analysis. Front Psychol. (2023) 14:1111195. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1111195
8. Yunsheng F and Yang L. The situation of Internet addiction among Korean college students and the effect of intervention in football training. Chin J Sch Health. (2016) 37:1890–2. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2016.12.041
9. Yinghai L. Experimental study on sports intervention of youth internet addiction. J TUS. (2013) 28:483–8. doi: 10.13297/j.cnki.issn1005-0000.2013.06.001
10. Zhang W and Xu R. Effect of exercise intervention on internet addiction and autonomic nervous function in college students. BioMed Res Int. (2022) 2022:5935353. doi: 10.1155/2022/5935353
11. Zhang X, Yang H, Zhang K, Zhang J, Lu X, Guo H, et al. Shi H et al: Effects of exercise or tai chi on Internet addiction in college students and the potential role of gut microbiota: A randomized controlled trial. J Affect Disord. (2023) 327:404–15. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2023.02.002
12. Xiao T, Jiao C, Yao J, Yang L, Zhang Y, Liu S, et al. Yu JJ et al: Effects of Basketball and Baduanjin Exercise Interventions on Problematic Smartphone Use and Mental Health among College Students: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. (2021) 2021:8880716. doi: 10.1155/2021/8880716
13. Bafeta A, Trinquart L, Seror R, and Ravaud P. Reporting of results from network meta-analyses: methodological systematic review. Bmj. (2014) 348:g1741. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g1741
14. Zhou Z, Wan Y, Li C, Yuan J, Gao G, Cui H, et al. Effectiveness of sports intervention: A meta-analysis of the effects of different interventions on adolescent internet addiction. J Affect Disord. (2024) 365:644–58. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2024.08.064
15. Zhang M, Meng SQ, Hasan AJ, Han Y, Han S, Li B, et al. Network meta-analysis of the effectiveness of different interventions for internet addiction in college students. J Affect Disord. (2024) 363:26–38. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2024.07.032
16. Hutton B, Salanti G, Caldwell DM, Chaimani A, Schmid CH, Cameron C, et al. The PRISMA extension statement for reporting of systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analyses of health care interventions: checklist and explanations. Ann Intern Med. (2015) 162:777–84. doi: 10.7326/M14-2385
17. Sawyer SM, Azzopardi PS, Wickremarathne D, and Patton GC. The age of adolescence. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. (2018) 2:223–8. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(18)30022-1
18. Zhao H, Rafik-Galea S, Fitriana M, and Song TJ. Translation and psychometric evaluation of Smartphone Addiction Scale-Short Version (SAS-SV) among Chinese college students. PloS One. (2022) 17:e0278092. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278092
19. Mak KK, Lai CM, Ko CH, Chou C, Kim DI, Watanabe H, et al. Psychometric properties of the Revised Chen Internet Addiction Scale (CIAS-R) in Chinese adolescents. J Abnorm Child Psychol. (2014) 42:1237–45. doi: 10.1007/s10802-014-9851-3
20. Owen PJ, Miller CT, Mundell NL, Verswijveren S, Tagliaferri SD, Brisby H, et al. Which specific modes of exercise training are most effective for treating low back pain? Network meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med. (2020) 54:1279–87. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2019-100886
21. Higgins JP, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, Jüni P, Moher D, Oxman AD, et al. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. Bmj. (2011) 343:d5928. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d5928
22. Salanti G. Indirect and mixed-treatment comparison, network, or multiple-treatments meta-analysis: many names, many benefits, many concerns for the next generation evidence synthesis tool. Res Synth Methods. (2012) 3:80–97. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1037
23. Chen X, He H, Xie K, Zhang L, and Cao C. Effects of various exercise types on visceral adipose tissue in individuals with overweight and obesity: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of 84 randomized controlled trials. Obes Rev. (2024) 25:e13666. doi: 10.1111/obr.13666
24. Cipriani A, Furukawa TA, Salanti G, Chaimani A, Atkinson LZ, Ogawa Y, et al. Comparative efficacy and acceptability of 21 antidepressant drugs for the acute treatment of adults with major depressive disorder: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Lancet. (2018) 391:1357–66. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32802-7
25. Zhang K, Guo H, Zhang X, Yang H, Yuan G, Zhu Z, et al. Shi H et al: Effects of aerobic exercise or Tai Chi Chuan interventions on problematic mobile phone use and the potential role of intestinal flora: A multi-arm randomized controlled trial. J Psychiatr Res. (2024) 170:394–407. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2024.01.012
26. Lanjun Z. Intervention of group psychotherapy and sports prescription on Internet addiction of college students. psychol Sci. (2009) 32:738–41. doi: 10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.2009.03.075
27. Jun G, Jianhua S, and Kunpeng X. Influence of sport interference on university students’Network addiction. J Shenyang Sport Univ. (2012) 31:55–9. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-0560.2012.04.014
28. Qianfeng X. Intervention of sports on college students’ Internet addiction. (2022). Huazhong University of Science and Technology.
29. Cuiying Y and Guofan Z. Influence of Taijiquan exercise on Internet addiction of college students. Chin JSch Health. (2017) 38:292–4. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2017.02.041
30. Chengsheng Z. Study on sports intervention of Internet addiction among college students in Kunming City. Sport Sci Technol. (2013) 34:127–8. doi: 10.14038/j.cnki.tykj.2013.04.035
31. Li Z. Study on sports intervention of Internet addiction in college students. (2008). Normal University.
32. Dong Y. Study on the effect of different exercise methods on Internet addiction of college students. J Pingdingshan Univ. (2021) 36:124–8. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-1670.2021.05.020
33. Yuanqi D. Study on the intervention of physical exercise on Internet addiction of vocational college students. J Vocational Educ. (2014) 35:35–8. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7518.2014.35.010
34. Jianhua R, Zuhui A, Chunlin H, Bo L, and Jiawei W. An experimental study on the intervention of physical exercise in Internet addiction of college students. Heilongjiang Med Pharm. (2014) 37:93–4. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-0104.2014.04.056
35. Lijun W and Yunhui C. Effectiveness of short-term high-intensity exercise combined with nutritional intervention in female college students with internet addiction and obesity. Chin JSch Health. (2020) 41:51–4. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2020.01.014
36. Min L, Li L, and Yu-juan C. Current situation and exercise prescription intervention of Internet addiction among middle school students. Chin J Sch Health. (2014) 35:1847–8. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2014.12.033
37. Qiuchun Q and Deping Z. Experimental study on the effect of e-sports on college students’ online game addiction. J Shenyang Sport Univ. (2011) 30:127–9. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-0560.2011.02.035
38. Jin W, Hui C, Zhenzhong D, and Wenjun W. Meta analysis for exercise preseription interferes with the effect of adolescent internet addiction. J Sports Sci. (2018) 39:46–54. doi: 10.13598/j.issn1004-4590.2018.03.008
39. Zhao Q, Lu Y, Zhou C, and Wang X. Effects of chronic exercise on attentional bias among individuals with methamphetamine use disorder. Psychol Sport Exercise. (2021) 52:101842. doi: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2020.101842
40. Zhao Q, Jianing L, Yingzhi L, and Chenglin Z. Effects of long-term aerobic exercise on drug craving of methamphetamine addicts ——Evidence from alpha wave. ChinJ Sports Med. (2020) 39:804–9. doi: 10.16038/j.1000-6710.2020.10.009
41. Teixeira PJ, Carraça EV, Markland D, Silva MN, and Ryan RM. Exercise, physical activity, and self-determination theory: a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. (2012) 9:78. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-9-78
42. Sanchez V, Lycas MD, Lynch WJ, and Brunzell DH. Wheel running exercise attenuates vulnerability to self-administer nicotine in rats. Drug Alcohol Depend. (2015) 156:193–8. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2015.09.022
43. Cardol CK, Escamilla CI, Gebhardt WA, and Perales JC. Exploring the direct or inverse association of physical activity with behavioral addictions and other self-regulation problems. Adicciones. (2019) 31:18–32. doi: 10.20882/adicciones.926
44. Chan JSY, Liu G, Liang D, Deng K, Wu J, and Yan JH. Special issue - therapeutic benefits of physical activity for mood: A systematic review on the effects of exercise intensity, duration, and modality. J Psychol. (2019) 153:102–25. doi: 10.1080/00223980.2018.1470487
45. Kujach S, Byun K, Hyodo K, Suwabe K, Fukuie T, Laskowski R, et al. A transferable high-intensity intermittent exercise improves executive performance in association with dorsolateral prefrontal activation in young adults. Neuroimage. (2018) 169:117–25. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.12.003
Keywords: internet addiction, teenagers, network meta-analysis, IA, adolescents,
Citation: Li Y, Zhong S and Lian L (2025) The effects of different exercise interventions on reducing internet addiction in adolescents or young adults: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Front. Psychiatry 16:1713076. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1713076
Received: 25 September 2025; Accepted: 27 October 2025;
Published: 26 November 2025.
Edited by:
Aviv M Weinstein, Ariel University, IsraelReviewed by:
André Luiz Monezi Andrade, Pontifical Catholic University of Campinas, BrazilYue-shuai Jiang, China University of Petroleum, China
Copyright © 2025 Li, Zhong and Lian. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Li Lian, bGlhbmxpNjAwODExQDEyNi5jb20=
†These authors share first authorship
Li Lian3*