ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Psychiatry
Sec. Anxiety and Stress Disorders
Acute and Post-Dosing Effects of Single-Dose Psilocybin for Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder in a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial: An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis
Provisionally accepted- 1Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
- 2Department of Social Work, Eastern Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN, United States
- 3New York University Postdoctoral Program in Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapy, New York, NY, United States
- 4Department of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States
- 5Center for Brain and Mind Health, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
- 6Child Study Center, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
- 7Department of Neuroscience, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
- 8Wu-Tsai Institute, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Introduction: The subjective effects of psilocybin on obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) are under-explored. Therefore, we conducted a qualitative study of participant experiences from the first randomized placebo-controlled trial of single-dose psilocybin combined with unstructured and non-directive support for individuals with treatment-refractory OCD. Our research explored how participants experienced acute and post-dosing effects, the interrelationships between these effects, and participants' perspectives on therapeutic change. Materials and Methods: We conducted qualitative interviews with 12 participants approximately one month after psilocybin dosing; (six who received psilocybin in the initial randomized placebo-controlled phase, six who received open-label psilocybin following unblinding). We analyzed interview transcripts via interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) and engaged in consensus decision-making to arrive at 100% intercoder agreement in the process of abstracting codes into higher-order themes. Results: Four major themes (and several subthemes) emerged from our analysis: 1) Influences on Psilocybin Experience (i.e., Set, Setting); 2) Acute Effects (i.e., Acute perceptual effects, Acute [meta]cognitive effects, Acute emotional effects, Acute impact of OCD, Other acute effects); 3) Post-Dosing Changes in OCD (i.e., Post-dosing changes in symptoms, Post-dosing changes in perceptions of OCD); as well as 4) Post-Dosing Changes Beyond OCD Symptoms (i.e., Post-dosing [meta]cognitive changes, Other post-dosing changes). Meaningful interrelationships among codes, subthemes, and themes were the norm. Discussion: Our findings highlight the moderate to strong influences of set and setting in the nature and trajectory of participants' psilocybin experiences. We also uncovered acute, synergistic visual/perceptual, emotional/psychological, and physiological/somatic effects that map onto those commonly reported in prior psilocybin trials for other closely related indications. However, these acute effects tended to occur at lower intensities (i.e., 'partial' experiences) potentially due to acute interference by OCD symptoms. Certain acute and post-dosing (meta)cognitive and behavioral effects also map onto putative mechanisms of action in evidence-based psychotherapy for OCD (e.g., exposure and response prevention [ERP] and acceptance and commitment therapy [ACT]). These findings yielded hypotheses for future investigation, and point toward potential integration of psilocybin with structured psychotherapy approaches for OCD.
Keywords: psilocybin, psychedelic, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, acute effects, Mental Health, Adult psychiatry, qualitative research, interpretative phenomenological analysis
Received: 16 Oct 2025; Accepted: 27 Nov 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Ching, Stahnke, Shnayder, Agin-Liebes, Adams, Amoroso, Baiz, Belser, Bohner, Burke, D'Amico, DePalmer, Eilbott, Fram, Grazioplene, Hokanson, Jankovsky, Kichuk, Martins, Purohit, Schaer, Sierra, Witherow, Pittenger and Kelmendi. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Terence H. W. Ching
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
