ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Rehabil. Sci.
Sec. Disability, Rehabilitation, and Inclusion
Volume 6 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fresc.2025.1571233
Staff Perspectives on Independence and Collaborative Practices in the IRIS Intervention: An Evaluation in Swedish LSS Residential Homes
Provisionally accepted
- 1School of Health, Care and Social Welfare, Mälardalen University College, Västerås, Sweden
- 2Örebro University, Örebro, Örebro, Sweden
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background and Purpose: Intensive Rehabilitation Coordination (IRIS), is an intensive, health-promoting habilitative intervention designed to prevent, reduce, and compensate for individuals' support needs while enhancing their independence. The purpose of this study is to explore staff experiences with the IRIS intervention in a municipality's LSS residential homes, with a focus on how independence is defined and operationalized and the resulting impact on service delivery.Methods: A qualitative study was conducted in which staff from various LSS residential homes were interviewed. The interviews were structured to examine differences in the interpretation of independence, the strategies used to support service users, and the collaborative nature of the intervention.Participants were asked to describe their approaches to encouraging or supporting independence in daily tasks and their interactions with quality coordinators.1 Results: The analysis revealed a lack of a shared definition of independence among staff, leading to varied approaches in supporting service users. Some staff members actively promoted independence by encouraging service users to perform everyday tasks on their own, while others performed these tasks for the service users due to practical considerations such as convenience and efficiency. Despite these variations, staff reported that service users still have the opportunity to make their own decisions regarding daily activities.Overall, the IRIS intervention was viewed positively, with its collaborative implementation cited as a key strength.The findings suggest that the absence of a unified conceptualization of independence can lead to inconsistent practices in LSS residential homes, potentially affecting the effectiveness of the intervention.The collaborative approach of IRIS, which fosters joint efforts among municipal professionals, appears to be instrumental in understanding and addressing service users' needs. Future research should focus on establishing a more standardized definition of independence to improve intervention consistency and outcomes for service users.
Keywords: Intellectual Disability, Disability, Interventions, self-efficacy, inclusion
Received: 06 Feb 2025; Accepted: 28 Apr 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Olsson, Loeb and Dag. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Sylvia Olsson, School of Health, Care and Social Welfare, Mälardalen University College, Västerås, Sweden
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.