Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Rehabil. Sci.

Sec. Interventions for Rehabilitation

Volume 6 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fresc.2025.1624757

This article is part of the Research TopicInsights in Interventions for Rehabilitation – 2023/2024View all 7 articles

Defining the Key Elements of the Affolter Model® in a multiprofessional Delphi Study: A First Step Toward Evidence-Based Tactual Interaction Therapy

Provisionally accepted
Tamarith  SchluneggerTamarith Schlunegger1*Sabine  AugsteinSabine Augstein2*Laurent  MunchLaurent Munch3*Frank  RoelandtFrank Roelandt4*Daniela  JakobsenDaniela Jakobsen5*
  • 1Liaison Services, UPK, Basel, Switzerland
  • 2Arbeitsgemeinschaft pro Wahrnehmung, St. Gallen, Switzerland
  • 3REHAB, Basel, Switzerland
  • 4No current affiliation, Kipfenberg, Germany
  • 5Neurorehabilitering København, Department for Quality, Development and Education, Kopenhagen, Denmark

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: Despite the versatile application of the Affolter Model®, using Tactual Interaction Therapy as a treatment approach in health, social and educational care of people with congenital brain disorder or acquired brain injury, high quality studies with robust designs for efficacy are scarce. Evaluation of the effectiveness of the Tactual Interaction Therapy requires agreement and consensus among practitioners of what constitutes this approach. Such consensus has yet to be achieved.To map the Affolter Model® by reaching consensus on its core domains among experienced practitioners.From September to December 2022, a modified online Delphi process with four survey rounds was conducted to map the core domains of the Affolter Model®. An international, interdisciplinary project group consisting of four senior instructors, trained in the use of the Affolter Model® created 29 initial statements. In the course of the four survey rounds, 40 practitioners (expert panel), all experienced users of the Affolter Model®, rated these statements on a five-point Likert scale. In addition, new statements were developed as well as new versions of existing statements. These were integrated into the surveys and submitted for evaluation. An a-priory consensus was set at a percentage approval of at least 80%.Results: Thirty-six statements out of a total of 38 statements reached consensus. The majority of statements (29/36) achieved an agreement of more than 90%. Statements that were initially rejected achieved consensus after being rephrased.Thirty-six core statements describing the Affolter Model® achieved consensus. By mapping the core domains of the Affolter Model®, this study provides a basis for teaching and developing the Affolter Model® in theory and practice and for further research projects to investigate its effectiveness in persons with perceptive and cognitive problems, limiting participation in everyday life.

Keywords: Affolter Modell®1, Affolter Concept®2, Tactual Interaction Therapy3, Delphi process4, consensus5, Perception6

Received: 07 May 2025; Accepted: 11 Sep 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Schlunegger, Augstein, Munch, Roelandt and Jakobsen. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Tamarith Schlunegger, t.schlunegger@hotmail.com
Sabine Augstein, sabine.augstein@wahrnehmung.ch
Laurent Munch, l.munch@rehab.ch
Frank Roelandt, roelandt@web.de
Daniela Jakobsen, jakobsen@formatt.org

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.