EDITORIAL article
Front. Rehabil. Sci.
Sec. Interventions for Rehabilitation
Volume 6 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fresc.2025.1626049
This article is part of the Research TopicPromoting Health Management in RehabilitationView all 6 articles
Editorial: Health Management Interventions for People with Disabilities
Provisionally accepted- 1Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, United States
- 2Duquesne University, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
- 3University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
As rehabilitation practitioners, we are charged with the mandate to help people with disabilities in achieving health equity. While rehabilitation has historically focused on functional recovery and independence in activities of daily living, our role must evolve to include supporting health management across the lifespan. While health interventions for people with disabilities are increasing, there are insufficient interventions to meet demand, and the interventions that do exist fail to leverage implementation science approaches to best address the most common barriers experienced by people with disabilities in their journey for better health (Gréaux, 2023) In response to this growing need, we present this Research Topic, "Promoting Health Management in Rehabilitation," which brings together contributions that advance our understanding of how to develop and implement interventions that promote health and wellness in people with disabilities. The articles in this collection align with various stages of the National Institute of Health Stage Model for Behavioral Intervention Development, offering insights into the complete intervention development process (NIH, 2024). First, Starosta et al. (2024) explored the importance of peer-led self-management in creating community connections for people with spinal cord injury (SCI). Their qualitative analysis of online forum posts revealed that participants engaged in skill building, resource sharing, and problem solving. Most notably, they identified a critical process theme called "bearing witness," describing the emotional connection to others with similar SCI-related challenges. Many participants reported that these groups represented their first engagement with a community having lived experience with SCI, highlighting the power of shared experience in making intervention content more impactful and relevant. 2024) conducted a qualitative study exploring clinician and patient experiences with shared decision-making (SDM) to promote daily arm use for individuals with chronic stroke. They identified three key themes: equal partnership, enhancing clinician confidence, and the distinctiveness of SDM compared to traditional approaches. The study highlighted important facilitators, such as clinician competence with SDM and open, trusting relationships with patients, while also identifying barriers including limited clinician expertise in SDM and patients' lack of foundational knowledge about stroke rehabilitation.Addressing persistent pain management, Curran et al. ( 2024) described a collaborative care (CC) intervention called TBI Care, specifically adapted to treat chronic pain in people living with traumatic brain injury (TBI). This approach emphasized expert clinician input, cognitive behavioral therapy techniques, and other non-pharmacological strategies for decreasing pain interference. Their findings showed high participant engagement, with 90% of participants receiving at least 11 of the targeted 12 sessions. All participants received pain education, selfmonitoring skills, goal setting/behavioral activation, and relaxation training, with significant decreases in pain interference scores throughout the intervention. 2024) conducted a pilot study to establish the feasibility and acceptability of a yoga and self-management education intervention called MY-Skills designed to support caregiving dyads (caregivers and care receivers) experiencing persistent pain. The intervention combined yoga with self-management education specifically developed for caregiving dyads. Their findings demonstrated that both in-person and online versions of the MY-Skills intervention exceeded benchmark criteria for attendance, safety, acceptability, and completion, with participants reporting high satisfaction despite the majority having experienced pain for over 10 years.Finally, Donoso Brown et al. ( 2025) conducted a qualitative study exploring caregiver perceptions of usual care home programs for persons with acquired brain injury after transition to the community. They identified two key themes: (1) how systems, roles, and responsibilities influenced caregivers' perceptions of home programs and recovery outlook, and (2) caregivers' home program experience. Their findings revealed that caregivers' outlook on recovery and home program implementation was influenced by the burden of responsibilities and system-level supports and barriers. Though caregivers reported limited training, they found it satisfactory, saw value in home programs, and advised others to engage in them.Collectively, these contributions advance our understanding of how to effectively develop and implement health management interventions for people with disabilities that match to the needs identified by the community. The interventional approaches presented in this special issue demonstrate a shift toward more comprehensive, person-centered rehabilitation that extends beyond traditional time-limited interventions. This shift acknowledges that the journey of disability is often lifelong, requiring ongoing support for health management. By focusing on developing sustainable health behaviors, we can help individuals with disabilities not only manage their conditions but potentially reduce the impact of secondary health complications. Despite these promising advances, significant challenges remain. Implementation of health management interventions in real-world settings requires addressing systemic barriers, including limited insurance coverage for preventive services, healthcare provider knowledge gaps, and accessibility issues (Iezzoni et al., 2022). Future research must continue to bridge the gap between intervention development and implementation science to ensure these innovative approaches reach those who need them most.The path toward health equity for people with disabilities requires concerted efforts to develop, implement, and evaluate interventions that empower individuals to establish and maintain healthpromoting behaviors. This Research Topic represents an important step in this journey, providing valuable guidance for researchers and clinicians alike. We hope these contributions will inspire continued innovation in this critical area of rehabilitation science.
Keywords: Intervention development, Health management, Disabilility, Chronic diseae, Feasability
Received: 09 May 2025; Accepted: 19 May 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Schwartz, Donoso Brown and Bleakley. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Jaclyn Schwartz, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, United States
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.