ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Rehabil. Sci.
Sec. Rehabilitation Engineering
Volume 6 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fresc.2025.1639249
This article is part of the Research TopicInsights in Rehabilitation Engineering – 2023/2024View all articles
Development and Validation of a Sliding Type Continuous Passive Motion Automation Device for Evaluation and Rehabilitation of Frozen Shoulder: A Pilot Study
Provisionally accepted- 1Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- 2Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- 3Department of Rehabilitational Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: Frozen shoulder (FS) is a condition that results in pain and restricted range of motion (ROM) in the shoulder joint, impacting daily activities. Current rehabilitation methods, including physical therapy and passive range of motion (PROM) exercise, can be limited by cost and availability. This study aimed to develop and test a novel robotic CPM device capable of measuring joint stiffness and improving accessibility and self-exercise effectiveness for FS patients.Methods: A 3-armed randomized clinical trial was conducted with 12 FS patients allocated into three groups: (1) hot pack treatment (negative control), (2) PROM by physiotherapists (active control), and (3) robotic CPM device-assisted exercise (intervention). ROM, pain levels using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), and the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) were measured at baseline, immediately post-intervention, and after a 6-week follow-up. A linear mixed model was applied for inter-group and intra-group analyses. Torque and stiffness were calculated using sensor data collected by the robotic device and Inertial Measurement Units (IMUs) for precise monitoring.Results: The intervention group showed significant improvement in ROM compared to the negative control group, particularly in external rotation (p = 0.022). Intra-group analysis for the intervention group revealed average ROM increases of 14.52 • , 16.72 • , and 14.19 • for flexion, abduction, and external rotation, respectively. Passive stiffness in the intervention group significantly decreased in abduction (p = 0.010) and external rotation (p < 0.001). Pain levels and SPADI scores decreased across all groups, with no statistically significant differences noted between the intervention and the postive control groups.Conclusions: The developed robotic CPM device demonstrated potential in improving ROM and reducing passive stiffness in FS patients, showing comparable results to therapist-assisted exercise. While the device enhances accessibility and self-monitoring capabilities, further studies are required to validate its use in home settings and assess its impact on long-term motivation for self-exercise.
Keywords: Frozen shoulder, Rehabilitation, Continuous passive motion (CPM), Joint stiffness, robot
Received: 01 Jun 2025; Accepted: 28 Jul 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Lee, Yun, Oh, Chung, Hwang, Kim and Cho. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Keewon Kim, Department of Rehabilitational Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
Kyujin Cho, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.