ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Sustain.
Sec. Waste Management
Volume 6 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/frsus.2025.1607525
University Students' E-Waste Disposal and Recycling Behavior: A Cross-Cultural Study Using an Integrated Psychological Model
Provisionally accepted- Department of Policy Science, College of Policy Science, Ritsumeikan University, Shiga, Japan
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
The escalating global volume of electronic waste (e-waste), coupled with low recycling rates, poses a significant environmental and public health challenge. This necessitates a deeper understanding of individual disposal behaviors, as Electronic waste (e-waste) is predominantly a problem due to the low level of individual engagement in the appropriate disposal of these materials. Individual engagement in pro-environmental behavior is as essential as technology implementation in managing the e-waste crisis, as changes in individual behavior could significantly influence environmental outcomes. This study takes a robust cross-cultural approach, surveying a sample of 2,450 university students, including 950 from Vietnam and 1,500 from Japan, who are frequent users of personal electronic devices and generally have high environmental awareness. University students' behaviors regarding e-waste disposal and recycling are explored owing to their frequent usage of personal devices and high awareness of environmental issThis studyBy integratinges the value-belief-norm model, valence theory, and drivers from reverse logistics concepts, this research to explores how students in two distinct cultural contexts assess and act their actions regarding e-waste disposal and recycling. Furthermore, this research pioneers the use of the Environmental Portrait Value Questionnaire to measure values associated with environmental actions and attitudes in e-waste recycling. The model was validated through a questionnaire survey of 950 Vietnamese and 1500 Japanese students. Using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM), the findings The findings supported the proposed hypotheses, indicating demonstrate that recycling inclinations were influenced by personal norms, regulation drivers, economic drivers, ascription of responsibility, and perceived benefits and risks toward e-waste recycling. Among them, regulation drivers had the largest impact in both countries (β=.331, p<.001, Vietnam; β=.344, p<.001, Japan). Furthermore, the model is promising for adoption in the field of e-waste recycling in other countries, as indicated by its good model fit (i.e., the root mean square error of approximation [RMSEA] <0.08; NFI, CFI, TLI > 0.9). These discoveries would be helpful for policymakers and researchers in both countries aiming to understand the factors driving students' decisions to recycle e-waste.
Keywords: E-waste management, Value-belief-norm (VBN), valence theory (VT), Reverse logistics (RL), structural equation modeling (SEM), environmental portrait survey questionnaire, students recycling intention
Received: 07 Apr 2025; Accepted: 14 Aug 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Trinh and Sakurai. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Duy Trinh, Department of Policy Science, College of Policy Science, Ritsumeikan University, Shiga, 603-8577, Japan
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.