- 1Department of Earth System Science, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States
- 2CGIAR Impact Area Platform on Environmental Health and Biodiversity, Nairobi, Kenya
- 3Department of Population Health and Disease Prevention, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States
Insect-based organic waste management (IBOWM) is revolutionary for tackling organic waste disposal and fostering sustainable food production. This review examines the multifaceted benefits of IBOWM, including its capacity to reduce landfill waste, decrease greenhouse gas emissions, and improve soil health through the practical application of nutrient-rich insect frass. A major contribution of this study is developing a comprehensive framework that illustrates how insect farming enhances ecosystem services by bolstering biodiversity and optimizing nutrient cycling. Drawing on current research and diverse regional case studies, the paper highlights successful IBOWM implementations while also identifying major challenges such as regulatory barriers and public acceptance issues. The economic implications are also explored, with an emphasis on job creation and sustainable livelihoods, particularly in rural communities. Additionally, the review underscores the critical need for supportive policies and harmonized regulatory frameworks across regions. Finally, future research directions are outlined, stressing the importance of standardized regulations, thorough economic assessments, and targeted public education initiatives. By creating a supportive environment for IBOWM, stakeholders can significantly advance sustainable waste management, enhance food security, and promote overall ecological health, ultimately paving the way for a more sustainable future.
Highlights
• IBOWM reduces landfill waste and lowers greenhouse gas emissions
• Insect frass enhances soil health and supports nutrient cycling
• The framework illustrates how insect farming boosts ecosystem services
• Economic benefits include job creation and sustainable livelihoods
• Direct new research toward regulations and enhancing public education
1 Introduction
Managing organic waste, such as food residues, plant materials, and agricultural byproducts, poses significant challenges to environmental sustainability (Doughmi et al., 2024). Rapid urbanization and population growth have led to a dramatic increase in organic waste production, resulting in resource depletion, greenhouse gas emissions, and the contamination of land and water resources (Bian et al., 2024; Li R. et al., 2023; Serafini et al., 2023). Improper disposal practices often release methane, a potent greenhouse gas that contributes to climate change, while many municipalities continue to struggle with effective waste segregation and treatment (Salemdeeb et al., 2018; Oliveira et al., 2017).
A further challenge in organic waste management is transforming public perceptions so that waste is seen as a valuable resource rather than as refuse destined for landfills. Although educating households on how food waste harms the environment fosters greener behavior, inadequate infrastructure and resources lead many communities to remain reliant on unsustainable methods such as landfilling and incineration (Jereme et al., 2016; Starostina et al., 2014). Moreover, waste-sorting policies, while potentially effective, often encounter resistance because of limited public engagement and understanding (Liu et al., 2024). Economically, the costs associated with waste collection, transportation, and treatment are substantial, particularly for municipalities with limited financial resources (Yalçınkaya and Kırtıloğlu, 2019). Although integrating composting and anaerobic digestion can reduce these costs and enhance resource recovery, their success depends on a comprehensive understanding of local conditions and active community involvement (Haupt et al., 2018; Sfetsas et al., 2023).
Ecosystem services like food, water, climate regulation, and nutrient cycling are crucial for sustaining environmental balance and human well-being (Costanza et al., 2014; Morimoto, 2020). In this context, insect-based organic waste management (IBOWM) emerges as a promising strategy that enhances these services. IBOWM harnesses specific insect, primarily black soldier fly (BSF) larvae and to a lesser extent, oil palm weevil larvae, to convert organic waste streams. These include poultry litter, catering leftovers, and agricultural byproducts, which are transformed into protein-rich insect biomass, organic frass biofertilizers, and renewable energy feedstocks (Kullan et al., 2024). By leveraging the larvae’s robust digestive capabilities and their symbiotic gut microbiota, this bioconversion process, sometimes termed entomoremediation, reduces waste volume while repurposing it following circular economy principles (Eke et al., 2023). This strategy enhances nutrient recycling and mitigates greenhouse gas emissions compared to traditional landfill practices (Ţucă and Stan, 2023; Siddiqui et al., 2024).
Moreover, converting waste into high-value resources bolsters food security and exemplifies a circular economy, wherein waste materials are repurposed as inputs for new products (Reynolds et al., 2022; Hawkey et al., 2021; Vrontaki et al., 2024). Meeting global sustainability targets hinges on integrating IBOWM into waste management systems as urbanization and food production pressures intensify (Hilo et al., 2024; Czekała et al., 2020). In addition, IBOWM has the potential to invigorate local economies by creating jobs within waste management and insect farming sectors, while also promoting community engagement in sustainable practices (Oktaviani et al., 2023; Kovalenko et al., 2024). Ongoing technological and research advancements will further boost IBOWM’s efficiency. This positions IBOWM as a critical strategy for addressing environmental challenges, fostering economic growth, and enhancing food security making it a prime target for future research and policy initiatives (Mouhrim et al., 2023; Ites et al., 2020).
This review explores novel aspects and identifies critical research gaps pivotal to advancing IBOWM. It presents a comprehensive framework that elucidates how IBOWM enhances ecosystem services, spanning waste reduction, nutrient cycling, biodiversity support, and climate change mitigation, a perspective that has largely been overlooked. By incorporating regional case studies of successful IBOWM applications, the study bridges the gap between theory and practice, thereby offering actionable insights for both stakeholders and policymakers. Furthermore, it highlights the economic benefits, such as sustainable job creation, and emphasizes the necessity for robust regulatory frameworks to overcome market access barriers and ensure the safe production of insect-based products. In doing so, the review makes a compelling case for the role of IBOWM in sustainable waste management, food security, and livelihood improvement.
In response to the urgent need to manage escalating organic waste sustainably, this study examines IBOWM as an innovative solution that harnesses insects to convert organic waste into value-added products like protein-rich biomass and organic fertilizers. By reducing greenhouse gas emissions, decreasing landfill dependency, enhancing soil health, and supporting biodiversity, IBOWM contributes to a circular economy in which waste is repurposed as a resource. This review is guided by three clear objectives: first, to assess IBOWM’s environmental, economic, and social benefits, including waste reduction and ecosystem enhancement; second, to build a simple framework linking waste management, nutrient cycling, biodiversity, and new business opportunities; and third, to examine current policies to identify barriers to broader IBOWM adoption. Together, these objectives underscore IBOWM’s potential to enhance sustainability and food security in rapidly urbanizing regions.
2 Environmental, resource recovery, and biodiversity and ecosystem health benefits
Integrating IBOWM into waste management and agricultural systems not only dramatically reduces landfill waste and greenhouse gas emissions but also reinforces the circular economy by transforming organic waste into valuable by-products. Additionally, this integration enhances ecosystem health and maintains biodiversity, showcasing IBOWM’s transformative potential as a sustainable solution for today’s environmental and economic challenges. Figure 1 encapsulates these diverse and highly interrelated benefits, illustrating IBOWM’s critical role in promoting environmental sustainability, resource recovery, and biodiversity enhancement.
2.1 Environmental benefits
IBOWM redirects organic residues such as food scraps and agricultural by-products from landfills into insect bioconversion systems, significantly cutting methane emissions under the anaerobic conditions that drive climate change (Noudeng et al., 2018; Singh et al., 2019). By harnessing black soldier fly larvae, IBOWM not only mitigates greenhouse gases but also shifts waste disposal away from unsustainable practices linked to rising emissions (Diener et al., 2011; Gligorescu et al., 2020). The nutrient-rich frass and larval biomass produced enhance soil fertility and ecosystem health, embodying circular-economy principles through efficient resource recovery (Czekała et al., 2020; Pliantiangtam et al., 2021). Empirical case studies reveal bioconversion efficiencies up to 45.9% and demonstrate the approach’s scalability across both agricultural operations and urban waste streams (Surendra et al., 2020; Broeckx et al., 2021).
2.1.1 Reduction in landfill waste
Insect-based organic waste management (IBOWM) offers a promising approach to reduce the amount of organic waste sent to landfills, addressing a central challenge in contemporary waste management. Traditional methods such as landfilling tend to accumulate organic residues, whereas employing insects, particularly BSF larvae, can effectively convert organic waste into high-value biomass (Scharff et al., 2023). For example, Rekha et al. (2022) demonstrated that BSF larvae achieved a waste reduction efficiency of 73.8% when processing municipal organic waste, underscoring the superior efficacy of this approach compared to conventional disposal practices.
Further evidence of IBOWM’s effectiveness is provided by various case studies. During a pilot project in Thailand, Usapein and Chavalparit (2014) reported that using BSF larvae for food waste treatment diverted nearly 79% of organic waste from landfills over a two-year period. Raga and Cossu (2017) also noted that such waste diversion significantly mitigates secondary environmental problems, including leachate contamination and the exacerbation of greenhouse gas emissions. Additionally, research by Kim et al. (2021) indicates that insects are highly adaptable, thriving on diverse organic substrates like food scraps and agricultural by-products, thereby enhancing overall waste processing efficiency. In contrast to traditional approaches, where, for example, approximately 90% of South Africa’s 55 million tonnes of general waste was landfilled in 2017, IBOWM not only lowers landfill volumes but also promotes a circular economy by recycling nutrients and producing high-value outputs such as animal feed and organic fertilizers (Ojha et al., 2020; Olatayo et al., 2024).
2.1.2 Greenhouse gas emissions reduction
IBOWM substantially curbs GHG emissions by diverting biodegradable material from anaerobic landfills, where it would decompose into methane, a gas with roughly 25 times the 100-year global warming potential of CO₂ to insect bioconversion systems (Chen et al., 2023). Rearing BSF larvae on food and agricultural residues shrinks the pool of substrate available for methanogenesis, with Chineme and Assefa (2023) reporting up to an 80% cut in methane emissions compared to traditional waste disposal or composting methods.
Beyond waste diversion, BSF larvae biomass serves as a low-carbon alternative to conventional feed proteins. Ellawidana et al. (2023) showed that replacing standard broiler feeds with full-fat BSF larvae meal enhances feed conversion efficiency and closes the organic-waste loop, thereby reducing overall methane emissions linked to both feed manufacture and post-farm waste decomposition. Fukuda et al. (2022) demonstrated that supplementing beef steers’ low-quality forage with BSF larvae improves nutrient intake and feed conversion ratios, and also lowers CO₂-equivalent emissions per kilogram of beef. In aquaculture, Priyadarshana et al. (2022) found that including BSF larvae in fish diets boosts growth performance and gut-microbiota health, which can reduce antibiotic reliance and associated pollutant runoff.
Life-cycle assessments underscore the climate advantage of insect protein: BSF larvae production emits roughly 1.5 kg CO₂-equivalent per kilogram of protein versus about 10 kg for beef (Huis and Oonincx, 2017). Moreover, by valorizing organic waste into insect biomass, IBOWM decreases dependence on synthetic fertilizers, significant sources of nitrous oxide and CO₂ during their synthesis and field application (Lisboa et al., 2024). A Dutch pilot study reported a 70% reduction in methane emissions when BSF larvae processed food waste instead of conventional composting (Chineme and Assefa, 2023), and European Union waste-management directives are increasingly recognizing insect farming as a high-impact strategy for meeting GHG reduction targets (Al-Shatnawi et al., 2020).
2.1.3 Soil health improvement
Frass, a by-product composed of insect excreta, leftover substrate, and fragments of exoskeleton, is a powerful enhancer of soil fertility and overall health. Rich in nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium, it functions as a potent organic fertilizer that supports robust nutrient availability in soils (Amorim et al., 2024). Beyond its nutrient content, frass promotes microbial diversity and abundance essential for sustaining soil fertility. Research on BSF frass shows that its application can significantly enhance nitrogen mineralization and nutrient release, thereby improving soil structure, nutrient cycling, water retention, and pathogen suppression (Beesigamukama et al., 2021).
Field trials further underscore the impact of frass on crop productivity. For example, in Uganda, maize treated with BSF frass achieved yield increases of up to 30% compared to those using conventional fertilization (Beesigamukama et al., 2022), while studies in sub-Saharan Africa indicate that edible insect frass enhances both the yield and nutritional quality of crops such as tomatoes, kales, and cowpeas (Anyega et al., 2021). Moreover, incorporating insect frass into agricultural practices aligns with circular economy principles by recycling organic waste and reducing reliance on synthetic fertilizers. This strategy not only minimizes problems like nutrient runoff and soil degradation but also strengthens the resilience of agricultural systems to climate variability (Nyamwasa et al., 2020; Poveda, 2021). Table 1 summarizes these environmental benefits, highlighting the key mechanisms through which IBOWM contributes to sustainable waste management solutions.
2.2 Resource recovery
IBOWM converts up to 90% of food-waste biomass into protein-rich larvae and nutrient-dense frass, yielding high-value animal feed and organic fertilizers (Bosch et al., 2019; Ţucă and Stan, 2023). By integrating BSF and mealworm bioconversion, this circular-economy approach slashes landfill volumes while delivering environmental and economic gains, high feed-conversion ratios, reduced disposal costs, and closed nutrient loops that reintegrate energy and matter into agricultural systems (Huis and Oonincx, 2017; Madau et al., 2020; Wang and Shelomi, 2017).
Yet IBOWM must address contaminant risks inherent in feedstocks. Agricultural and industrial residues often contain persistent heavy metals, lead, mercury, cadmium, that can accumulate in frass and, if unmanaged, contaminate soils and water bodies (Oluwatoyin, 2018). Likewise, antibiotic residues from livestock manure and sewage sludge promote the spread of antibiotic-resistance genes (ARGs); although insect bioconversion can reduce ARG abundance, conventional treatments rarely eliminate them completely, posing ecological and human-health concerns (Deng et al., 2022; Thakali et al., 2020). Furthermore, co-selection by metals and antibiotics may drive microbial communities to harbor both metal- and drug-resistance traits, amplifying the potential dissemination of resistance genes throughout agroecosystems (Pepper et al., 2018; Kanger et al., 2020).
2.2.1 Conversion of organic waste to valuable by-products
IBOWM provides a sustainable strategy for transforming organic waste into high-value commodities. By employing substrates such as food scraps and agricultural residues for rearing insect larvae, including BSF and oil palm weevils, the process not only diverts substantial waste from landfills but also produces high-quality protein. For example, Chamoun et al. (2023) demonstrated that protein derived from this process can effectively substitute conventional animal feed. Previously, Gasco et al. (2020) highlighted that this bioconversion significantly reduces the environmental footprint of traditional feedstocks, while Moqsud (2021) noted the superior feed conversion efficiency achieved through insect biomass production.
In addition to protein production, insect by-products such as frass serve as exceptional organic fertilizers. Frass, rich in nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium, enhances soil health by increasing microbial diversity and promoting nutrient cycling, as reported by Voltolini et al. (2020). Its application has also been linked to improved crop yields; for instance, Carnier et al. (2019) recorded a 30% increase in maize yield in Uganda with BSF frass, and Munubi and Lamtane (2021) found that processing food waste with BSF larvae in the Netherlands produced around 20,000 tons of insect protein annually. Collectively, these findings emphasize that IBOWM not only recycles waste into valuable resources but also bolsters the circular economy and enhances environmental sustainability.
2.2.2 Economic implications
Insect-based organic waste management (IBOWM) delivers notable economic advantages by converting organic waste into high-value commodities such as protein-rich animal feed and organic fertilizers at a lower cost than conventional methods. Insect protein production is particularly efficient, requiring significantly less land, water, and energy than traditional livestock farming. Chiaraluce et al. (2021) report that this approach is highly resource-efficient, and Siregar et al. (2023) highlight that insects can achieve a feed conversion ratio as low as 1.7 compared to around 8 for cattle. This improved efficiency not only reduces operational expenses for farmers and businesses but also boosts the overall economic viability of IBOWM systems.
Moreover, IBOWM has the potential to stimulate local economies by generating opportunities across waste management, insect farming, and agricultural sectors. As the demand for sustainable protein and organic fertilizers grows, the market is well positioned for expansion and job creation in areas such as insect rearing, processing, and distribution (Sousa et al., 2021). The circular economy model inherent in IBOWM further promotes collaboration among farmers, waste management firms, and food producers, spurring innovation and economic diversification (Trică et al., 2019). For instance, in Indonesia, the adoption of circular economy principles in insect farming has led to the emergence of numerous small and medium-sized enterprises focused on waste valorization (Головина et al., 2023), while similar initiatives in Europe have successfully cut waste disposal costs and increased revenue from insect-based products (Goyal et al., 2016). These findings, summarized in Table 2, underscore IBOWM’s transformative potential to drive growth, create employment opportunities, and support a more resilient, circular economy.
2.3 Biodiversity and ecosystem health
IBOWM enhances biodiversity and ecosystem health by embedding insect farming within agricultural landscapes, creating microhabitats that sustain diverse insect populations and robust pollinator communities (Kovács-Hostyánszki et al., 2017). By fostering interactions among native flora and fauna, IBOWM boosts essential ecosystem services such as nutrient cycling and biological pest control that underpin sustainable crop production (Garratt et al., 2018; Sutter and Albrecht, 2016). Field studies show that IBOWM systems with ecological margins and varied cropping practices deliver higher species richness and improved landscape connectivity for pollinators (Dilts et al., 2023; Mbelede et al., 2023). Overall, by marrying waste management with biodiversity conservation, IBOWM fortifies ecosystem resilience and offers a sustainable pathway for agricultural systems (Jankielsohn, 2018; Prajapati et al., 2024).
2.3.1 Contribution to biodiversity
Insect farming enhances local biodiversity by transforming organic waste into substrates that support a wide variety of insect species, thereby increasing habitat complexity and contributing to a more resilient agricultural landscape (Paradise et al., 2014). Integrated with organic farming practices, this approach has been shown to boost species richness and abundance, as evidenced by studies in bottle gourd cultivation where insect diversity was significantly elevated (Prajapati et al., 2024). Moreover, the presence of diverse insect communities is critical for sustaining essential ecosystem functions. These communities not only enhance pollination and expedite the decomposition of organic matter but also serve as an important food source for wildlife (Adjaloo and Oduro, 2013). Additionally, robust insect populations help reduce ecosystem vulnerability to pests and diseases (Kremen and Miles, 2012) while promoting improved nutrient cycling and pest regulation, thereby reinforcing overall ecosystem stability and agricultural productivity (Froidevaux et al., 2017).
2.3.2 Ecological interactions
Insect farming integrates seamlessly into agricultural landscapes, fostering beneficial ecological interactions that enhance ecosystem health and stability. By converting organic waste into substrates that support diverse insect communities, this approach not only boosts overall biodiversity but also reinforces essential ecosystem services such as pollination and pest control. Research by Lichtenberg et al. (2017) indicates that diverse insect populations build resilience against environmental stressors and stabilize ecosystem processes, while cultivating insects alongside crops creates complex microhabitats that support various arthropods critical for nutrient cycling and pest regulation (Estrada-Carmona et al., 2022).
Moreover, insect farming has a pronounced positive impact on local pollinator populations. Studies have shown that organic farming practices incorporating insect rearing promote higher diversity and abundance among pollinators like bees and butterflies (Stein-Bachinger et al., 2020), with Boonchuay and Bumrungsri (2022) documenting elevated bat activity, closely linked to insect abundance, in organic rice fields compared to conventional ones. Reviews and meta-analyses further suggest that agricultural systems characterized by reduced pesticide use and increased habitat complexity support enhanced species richness and biodiversity, thereby reinforcing sustainable agriculture (Estrada-Carmona et al., 2022). These findings, along with additional supporting evidence, are summarized in Table 3, which details the key ecological benefits of IBOWM and highlights its transformative role in promoting biodiversity and ecosystem health.
3 Framework and metrics for enhancing ecosystem services through IBOWM
This section presents a framework and metrics for enhancing ecosystem services through IBOWM by turning organic waste into valuable insect-derived products while fostering environmental, economic, and social sustainability. It builds on the principle of ecosystem multifunctionality, stressing that biodiversity restoration is essential for resilient service delivery (Allan et al., 2015). The framework integrates supportive regulations, stakeholder engagement, and targeted incentives to embed IBOWM across varied socio-ecological contexts (Keeler et al., 2019). It employs metrics such as water-quality to human-well-being indices and payment-for-ecosystem-services schemes to inform land-use decisions and promote sustainable practices (Keeler et al., 2012). Spatial modeling of land-use changes and service distributions guides adaptive management at multiple scales (Liu et al., 2023; Bagstad et al., 2014), and continuous feedback loops ensure the framework evolves with new ecological insights, addressing trade-offs and synergies for long-term ecosystem health (Bravo et al., 2023; Hanes et al., 2017; Ringold et al., 2013).
3.1 Framework for enhancing ecosystem services through IBOWM
The IBOWM framework adopts a comprehensive strategy that integrates environmental, economic, and social benefits by harnessing the natural abilities of insects, specifically BSF and oil palm weevil larvae, to transform organic waste into valuable by-products. This innovative process drastically reduces waste sent to landfills, mitigates greenhouse gas emissions such as methane and carbon dioxide, and recycles important nutrients back into agricultural systems. The recovered biomass is repurposed as animal feed, while the resulting frass functions as a nutrient-rich organic fertilizer (Allan et al., 2015), as depicted in Figure 1.
Beyond waste reduction, insect farming plays a pivotal role in enhancing local biodiversity by creating microhabitats that support beneficial insects, including pollinators and natural pest predators, thereby stabilizing key ecosystem processes (Nelson et al., 2010). Economically, the establishment of insect farming operations drives local growth by generating employment opportunities in waste management and agriculture, and bolstering food security through alternative protein sources (Gittman et al., 2016). Importantly, by diverting organic waste and repurposing it into food, feed, and fertilizer, IBOWM contributes to climate change mitigation by reducing the carbon footprint relative to conventional waste management and livestock production (Platonova et al., 2022). Figure 2 summarizes these interconnected benefits, illustrating how IBOWM offers a transformative solution to both environmental and economic challenges while paving the way for a more sustainable and resilient future.
3.2 Implementation of the framework
Effective implementation of the IBOWM framework begins with targeted educational campaigns, participatory initiatives, and mass-media outreach to showcase its environmental and nutritional benefits (Hunter et al., 2023) as depicted in Figure 3. Engaging local communities from the outset fosters ownership and ensures stakeholder input guides the integration of IBOWM into existing waste management and agricultural practices (Bozdaglar, 2023). At the same time, co-developing harmonized regulatory frameworks with government bodies, researchers, and industry partners establishes the safety, quality-control, and sustainability standards needed, drawing lessons from the EU’s environmental management models (Duc and Thanh, 2023). Aligning IBOWM with current waste systems then creates synergies that drive sustainable farming, stimulate local economies, and generate new jobs in waste management and insect production (Juniyanti et al., 2024). Finally, ongoing research coupled with targeted economic incentives and clear performance metrics enables adaptive monitoring and continuous improvement, maximizing the framework’s environmental, economic, and social impacts (Puiu and Udriștioiu, 2023). Table 4 outlines the essential steps and key considerations for successfully implementing the framework for enhancing ecosystem services through IBOWM.
3.3 Evaluating IBOWM impact: metrics and indicators
A robust evaluation of IBOWM’s impact on ecosystem services hinges on a suite of metrics spanning environmental, economic, and social domains (Allan et al., 2015; Balvanera et al., 2006). Waste reduction and resource recovery are gauged by the volume of organics diverted from landfills, declines in methane emissions, and the share of nutrients returned to fields via insect biomass and frass, metrics shown to correlate with substantial GHG abatements (Fu et al., 2015; Ma et al., 2016). Nutrient cycling and soil health are tracked through changes in fertility indicators, crop-yield boosts from frass applications, and improvements in soil structure and microbial activity (Ouyang et al., 2020). Biodiversity enhancement is assessed by monitoring gains in species richness and habitat complexity following IBOWM adoption (Allan et al., 2015; Balvanera et al., 2006; Egoh et al., 2009). Economic outcomes, job creation, income growth, and market expansion for insect-derived products provide insight into the model’s viability (Maseyk et al., 2017; Zhao and Wang, 2021). Climate-change mitigation benefits are measured via net reductions in greenhouse-gas emissions and overall carbon footprints (Martín-López et al., 2012; Guerry et al., 2015). Finally, public awareness and acceptance, key to scaling IBOWM are evaluated through surveys of consumer knowledge and practice uptake (Keeler et al., 2019). Table 5 offers an in-depth overview of these measures and serves as a practical guide for assessing IBOWM’s success and impact.
4 Best practices and challenges in implementing IBOWM
Effective IBOWM implementation hinges on embedding systems into local economies through government-led training and strong public-private-community partnerships to drive participation and ownership (Khairifa et al., 2025; Dibia et al., 2022). Overcoming regulatory and market hurdles requires aligning local regulations with national policies, clarifying roles within informal waste sectors, and adopting life-cycle assessment tools for informed decision-making (Avarand et al., 2023; Ebrahimi and North, 2017). Boosting public awareness via targeted education programs increases uptake, while ensuring social equity in outreach protects vulnerable communities from being left behind (Knickmeyer, 2020; Sarkodie and Owusu, 2020). Finally, sustaining long-term success demands continuous R&D, leveraging multi-criteria decision frameworks, digital sorting technologies, and advanced composting or recycling innovations to keep IBOWM adaptable, efficient, and scalable (Alsubaei et al., 2022; Jayasinghe et al., 2023; Sadessa and Balo, 2025).
4.1 Lessons learned and best practices
Implementing IBOWM across diverse regions has provided valuable insights and highlighted best practices essential for future endeavors. Integrating insect farming into local economies has proven particularly effective. For example, in Thailand, cricket farming not only supplies a sustainable protein source but also fosters social cohesion among farmers by reinforcing strong institutional support and cooperative frameworks (Halloran et al., 2016a). Similarly, in Africa, using local agricultural by-products as feed has effectively reduced waste and enhanced sustainability, demonstrating that leveraging local resources can lower costs and strengthen insect farming operations (Alemu et al., 2023). Additionally, targeted agricultural training and nutrition education have played key roles in promoting insect farming, thereby addressing food security while driving economic development.
In the European Union, the valorization of organic waste streams for insect farming underscores the need to overcome regulatory and market challenges. Supportive policy frameworks and market incentives have been instrumental in encouraging the use of organic waste in insect farming and in creating opportunities for insect-based products (Peer et al., 2021). Continuous research and innovation are vital; collaborations between research institutions, governments, and industry stakeholders have facilitated the development of new technologies and optimized processes for more efficient operations (Fowles and Nansen, 2019). Equally important, public awareness initiatives such as educational campaigns and community engagement have successfully promoted the benefits of insect farming and addressed cultural misconceptions by providing evidence-based information on the safety and nutritional value of insect-based products (Alemu et al., 2023).
Furthermore, ensuring the long-term sustainability of IBOWM initiatives depends on addressing both environmental and social impacts. Best practices include conducting thorough environmental impact assessments, upholding fair labor standards, and ensuring that insect farming operations do not harm local ecosystems (Pliantiangtam et al., 2021). Projects that prioritize social equity and environmental protection tend to achieve long-term success and contribute significantly to sustainable development goals. By integrating these insights and practices, future IBOWM initiatives can enhance agricultural resilience and help create a more sustainable and resilient food system. Table 6 summarizes these key lessons and best practices, offering practical strategies and examples to guide upcoming IBOWM projects.
4.2 Overcoming key implementation challenges in IBOWM
IBOWM faces several key hurdles that impede its widespread adoption. A major challenge is the existing regulatory framework; many regions continue to use food safety and animal feed regulations that do not address the unique aspects of insect production, creating uncertainty for producers and investors (Broeckx et al., 2021). Limited public awareness and acceptance of insects as a viable food source further constrain market demand. Additionally, scaling up insect farming operations to meet larger market needs requires significant investments in infrastructure, advanced technology, and workforce training, while the inconsistent availability of organic waste as feed adds to production variability and impacts product quality (Fowles and Nansen, 2019; Pazmiño et al., 2023).
To overcome these challenges, several innovative solutions are emerging. Establishing clear, targeted regulatory frameworks is vital; comprehensive guidelines can ensure food safety, improve market confidence, and market incentives can further stimulate industry growth (Badu-Yeboah et al., 2018; Pinotti and Ottoboni, 2021). Public education campaigns are also essential to dispel myths and highlight the environmental and nutritional benefits of insect-based products (Al-Rumaihi et al., 2020; Candian et al., 2023). Additionally, technological advancements, such as implementing automated insect farming systems and enhanced waste processing methods, promise to improve efficiency and scalability. Integrating insect farming with existing agricultural practices may also create beneficial synergies that bolster both waste management and crop production (Al-Otaibi et al., 2022; Azizah et al., 2021). Table 7 provides an overview of the key challenges and the proposed strategies to overcome them.
4.3 Global perspectives on circular bio-waste management
The United Nations Environment Program’s Global Waste Management Outlook 2024 underscores how inadequate disposal exacerbates climate change, biodiversity loss and public-health risks, challenges most acute in low- and middle-income countries where open dumping and burning remain widespread (UNEP, 2024; Ferronato and Torretta, 2019). This report projects a sharp rise in municipal solid waste and champions a circular-economy shift, turning refuse into resources which dovetails perfectly with insect-driven bioconversion strategies.
In Europe, pilot programs and policy frameworks have pioneered integrated biowaste solutions that combine enhanced source separation, advanced composting and novel valorization pathways. Sharma et al. (2021) document how circular-economy principles boost recovery rates, while the Biocircularities project catalogues 36 exemplary practices, ranging from decentralized collection hubs to high-efficiency digesters that cut landfill dependence and reclaim valuable nutrients (Johari et al., 2021). Concurrently, UNECE analyses highlight that municipalities can leverage recycling, waste-to-energy and bioconversion to transform burgeoning waste streams into economic and environmental assets (Sharma et al., 2021).
Beyond policy, technology and community engagement are catalyzing change. The World Bank warns that without modern systems, waste management will continue to drive greenhouse-gas emissions and economic losses in urban centers worldwide (Islam et al., 2025). Mobile apps and sensor-based sorting tools are already empowering households to reduce and segregate food waste, laying the groundwork for scalable insect-rearing operations (Hong et al., 2023). At the same time, linking IBOWM to the UN Sustainable Development Goals clarifies its contributions to zero hunger, clean water, climate action and sustainable cities (Sharma et al., 2021).
Finally, regional success stories, such as the collaborative waste-reduction initiative on the Mississippi Gulf Coast demonstrate how multi-stakeholder platforms can optimize diversion, recovery and local buy-in (Evans-Cowley and Arroyo-Rodríguez, 2013). These global lessons reinforce the urgency of sustainable waste governance and spotlight insect-based bioconversion as a keystone technology in a truly circular, regenerative bio-economy.
5 Enhancing policy frameworks, strategies, and future directions for IBOWM
Integrating IBOWM into current policy frameworks is key to boosting environmental sustainability and food security in line with the UN SDGs (Béné et al., 2022; Kremen, 2020). Existing regulations often link food systems and ecological health but lack a holistic sustainability focus, ignoring ecological intensification and community engagement (Akimova and Коваленко, 2021; Diachkova et al., 2022). Robust policies should embed participatory governance, incentivize agricultural innovation, including digital tools, and expand education and training to empower stakeholders (Comerford et al., 2021; MacPherson et al., 2022; Pretorius and Schönfeldt, 2023). Clear sustainability metrics and regulatory incentives will guide implementation and accountability across diverse contexts (Allen et al., 2018; Zou et al., 2023). Finally, future research must refine urban food-system frameworks, deepen interdisciplinary collaboration, and apply participatory modeling to scale IBOWM effectively (Kapsdorferova et al., 2021; Tahat et al., 2020). Iterative alignment of policy, practice, and evidence will unlock IBOWM’s potential to transform waste management and strengthen food-system resilience.
5.1 Current policies and regulations
Policies supporting IBOWM are increasingly being designed to integrate insect farming into sustainable food systems and waste management practices. For instance, in the European Union, the Animal Feed Regulation (EU Regulation 2017/1017) has established a framework for the safe incorporation of insect-derived products into animal feed, positioning insects as a sustainable alternative protein source under rigorous food safety standards (Rhoades et al., 2019). Similarly, Thailand has implemented comprehensive guidelines that emphasize rearing insects on organic waste and producing safe insect-based products, thereby reinforcing best practices for sustainable insect farming (Shahrani and Al–Surimi, 2018).
Despite these advances, the industry continues to face significant regulatory challenges. A major issue is the lack of harmonized regulations across regions, which not only creates trade barriers but also complicates market access for insect-based products. Furthermore, many current agricultural and waste management policies fail to address the unique operational needs of insect farms, leading to compliance uncertainties and inefficiencies (Wang et al., 2019). In addition, persistent public misconceptions regarding the safety and nutritional value of insect products further constrain consumer acceptance and market demand (Schmidt et al., 2018). Overcoming these obstacles will require policymakers to develop coherent, harmonized regulations that ensure safety and quality, enhance public trust, and support the growth of the industry. Table 8 provides a summary of these current policies and regulatory challenges, offering a detailed overview of established frameworks, existing issues, and the influential role of public perception in advancing IBOWM.
5.2 Recommendations for policy enhancement
Promoting the widespread adoption of IBOWM begins with robust support for industrial-scale production and clear regulatory oversight. Governments should fund R&D and pilot facilities to refine rearing conditions, temperature, humidity, and substrate formulations for high-performing species like BSF, while offering grants, soft loans, and tax credits to incentivize private investment in modular, climate-controlled insect farms (Joly and Nikiema, 2019; Shafer et al., 2022). At the same time, policymakers must establish harmonized food- and feed-safety protocols that address hygiene standards, contaminant limits, and potential allergenicity of insect products. Drawing on the EU’s environmental-management regulations can provide a proven template to build consumer trust, streamline market entry, and ensure consistent quality control (Li M. et al., 2023; Papargyropoulou et al., 2014).
Equally essential is demonstrating IBOWM’s economic and environmental viability. Mandating detailed life-cycle and cost–benefit analyses across various production scales and waste substrates will quantify returns on investment and guide policy decisions (Lisboa et al., 2024; Schilke et al., 2018). To lower entry barriers, financial support schemes, such as start-up grants, tax rebates, and public–private financing partnerships should be deployed, showcasing long-term savings from reduced waste disposal and revenue from high-value insect biomass. Finally, requiring comprehensive life-cycle assessments of energy use, greenhouse-gas emissions, and water footprints, alongside incentives for on-site renewable energy (solar, biogas), will minimize environmental impacts and align IBOWM with existing waste-management and agricultural policies to strengthen food security and local economies (Halloran et al., 2016b; Semernya et al., 2017; Smetana, 2023). Table 9 distills five key policy levers essential for driving a sustainable, scalable IBOWM sector.
5.3 Bridging knowledge gaps and setting future research priorities
IBOWM holds great promises for tackling waste management and bolstering food security, but several critical knowledge gaps must be addressed to unlock its full potential. First, harmonized regulatory frameworks are needed to enable the safe, scalable production of insects for food and feed, as regional inconsistencies currently limit market growth (Platonova et al., 2022). Second, detailed life-cycle assessments of different farming systems and organic substrates will be vital for quantifying environmental benefits and economic viability at scale (Schilke et al., 2018). Third, consumer acceptance remains a hurdle, research should probe public perceptions and develop targeted communication strategies that emphasize the nutritional and ecological upsides of insect-based products (Gilbert et al., 2018). Fourth, exploring synergies with agroecology and permaculture could yield innovative models for weaving insect farming into broader sustainable food systems (Wazzan et al., 2021). Fifth, long-term field studies are essential to track IBOWM’s ecological and economic impacts over time and clarify its role in ecosystem resilience (Pope and Mazmanian, 2016). Sixth, to fully realize IBOWM’s resource-recovery potential, rigorous monitoring of heavy-metal concentrations and antibiotic-resistance gene (ARG) profiles is essential, alongside substrate pretreatment or targeted remediation strategies; future research must refine these control measures and assess the long-term environmental impacts of persistent contaminants in insect-bioconversion systems (Liao et al., 2019; Zubair et al., 2023).
Beyond these priorities, optimization of species selection and waste-to-insect conversion ratios demand comparative trials across diverse substrates (Lisboa et al., 2024). To accelerate progress, policymakers should foster consortia linking universities, research centers, and industry, while dedicated training and knowledge-transfer programs can build capacity and disseminate best practices (Joly and Nikiema, 2019). Table 10 distills these gaps into actionable research directions, laying a roadmap for positioning IBOWM as a transformative, sustainable-development tool.
6 Conclusion
This study demonstrates the multifaceted advantages of IBOWM in strengthening ecosystem services and advancing sustainability. Through a detailed exploration of its environmental, economic, and social dimensions, we have shown that IBOWM effectively reduces organic waste, curbs greenhouse gas emissions, enhances soil health, supports biodiversity, and improves food security. Our structured framework reveals the complex interconnections among waste management, nutrient recycling, and economic opportunities, offering a comprehensive perspective on how IBOWM can bolster ecological health and sustainable development.
Moreover, our analysis of current policies and regulatory frameworks highlights critical gaps that impede the widespread adoption of IBOWM. Recognizing these challenges is essential for guiding future initiatives and ensuring that IBOWM can be seamlessly integrated into existing waste management systems. The regional case studies presented here provide practical lessons and best practices for overcoming these barriers, emphasizing the need for close collaboration between policymakers, researchers, and practitioners.
Finally, this study underscores the necessity for further research to address remaining concerns regarding the economic viability of IBOWM and its public acceptance. Future efforts should concentrate on establishing standardized regulations, undertaking comprehensive economic evaluations, and promoting educational initiatives to enhance public awareness. By fully harnessing the potential of IBOWM, we can make significant strides toward sustainable waste management, improved food security, and healthier ecosystems, ultimately paving the way for a more sustainable future.
Author contributions
LA: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. CM: Conceptualization, Methodology, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. WE: Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. EC: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. BE: Funding acquisition, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.
Funding
The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. We acknowledge funding from the Schwab Charitable (www.schwab.com). BE was supported by SLAON Foundation (https://sloan.org) and HELLMAN Foundation (https://hellmanfoundation.org) as a Fellow.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The authors declare that no Gen AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
Adjaloo, M., and Oduro, W. (2013). Insect assemblage and the pollination system in cocoa ecosystems. J. Appl. Biosci. 62:4582. doi: 10.4314/jab.v62i0.86070
Akimova, Y., and Коваленко, Е. (2021). Conceptual framework for sustainable development of food market. Laplage Em Rev. 7, 96–106. doi: 10.24115/s2446-622020217extra-c991p.96-106
Alemu, M., Halloran, A., Olsen, S., Anankware, J., Nyeko, P., Ayieko, M., et al. (2023). Promoting insect farming and household consumption through agricultural training and nutrition education in Africa: a study protocol for a multisite cluster-randomized controlled trial. PLoS One 18:e0288870. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288870
Allan, E., Manning, P., Alt, F., Binkenstein, J., Blaser, S., Blüthgen, N., et al. (2015). Land use intensification alters ecosystem multifunctionality via loss of biodiversity and changes to functional composition. Ecol. Lett. 18, 834–843. doi: 10.1111/ele.12469
Allen, T., Prosperi, P., Cogill, B., Padilla, M., and Peri, I. (2018). A delphi approach to develop sustainable food system metrics. Soc. Indic. Res. 141, 1307–1339. doi: 10.1007/s11205-018-1865-8
Al-Otaibi, A., Bowan, P., daiem, M., Said, N., Ebohon, O., Alabdullatief, A., et al. (2022). Identifying the barriers to sustainable management of construction and demolition waste in developed and developing countries. Sustain. For. 14:7532. doi: 10.3390/su14137532
Al-Rumaihi, A., McKay, G., Mackey, H., and Al-Ansari, T. (2020). Environmental impact assessment of food waste management using two composting techniques. Sustain. For. 12:1595. doi: 10.3390/su12041595
Al-Shatnawi, Z., Alnusairat, S., and Kakani, A. (2020). Towards zero solid waste in Jordanian universities: the case of Al-Ahliyya Amman University. Environ. Res. Eng. Manag. 76, 46–59. doi: 10.5755/j01.erem.76.4.27369
Alsubaei, F., Al-Wesabi, F., and Hilal, A. (2022). Deep learning-based small object detection and classification model for garbage waste management in smart cities and IoT environment. Appl. Sci. 12:2281. doi: 10.3390/app12052281
Amorim, H., Ashworth, A., Arsi, K., Rojas, M., Morales-Ramos, J., Donoghue, A., et al. (2024). Insect frass composition and potential use as an organic fertilizer in circular economies. J. Econ. Entomol. 117, 1261–1268. doi: 10.1093/jee/toad234
Anyega, A., Korir, N., Beesigamukama, D., Changeh, G., Kiatoko, N., Subramanian, S., et al. (2021). Black soldier fly-composted organic fertilizer enhances growth, yield, and nutrient quality of three key vegetable crops in sub-Saharan Africa. Front. Plant Sci. 12:680312. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.680312
Avarand, N., Tavakoli, B., and Bora, K. (2023). Life cycle assessment of urban waste management in Rasht, Iran. Integr. Environ. Assess. Manag. 19, 1385–1393. doi: 10.1002/ieam.4751
Azizah, A., Pranoto, P., and Budiastuti, M. (2021). Growth performance of hermetia illucens and tenebrio molitor in different organic waste biconversion process. Int. J. Multicult. Multirelig. Underst. 8:64. doi: 10.18415/ijmmu.v8i8.2815
Badu-Yeboah, K., Clifford, A., and Kwasi, K. (2018). Stakeholders perceptions on key drivers for and barriers to household e-waste management in Accra, Ghana. Afr. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 12, 429–438. doi: 10.5897/ajest2018.2409
Bagstad, K., Villa, F., Batker, D., Harrison-Cox, J., Voigt, B., and Johnson, G. (2014). From theoretical to actual ecosystem services: mapping beneficiaries and spatial flows in ecosystem service assessments. Ecol. Soc. 19:264. doi: 10.5751/es-06523-190264
Balvanera, P., Pfisterer, A., Buchmann, N., He, J., Nakashizuka, T., Raffaelli, D., et al. (2006). Quantifying the evidence for biodiversity effects on ecosystem functioning and services. Ecol. Lett. 9, 1146–1156. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00963.x
Banks, I., Gibson, W., and Cameron, M. (2013). Growth rates of black soldier fly larvae fed on fresh human faeces and their implication for improving sanitation. Trop. Med. Int. Health 19, 14–22. doi: 10.1111/tmi.12228
Beesigamukama, D., Mochoge, B., Korir, N., Ghemoh, C., Subramanian, S., and Tanga, C. (2021). In situ nitrogen mineralization and nutrient release by soil amended with black soldier fly frass fertilizer. Sci. Rep. 11:14799. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-94269-3
Beesigamukama, D., Subramanian, S., and Tanga, C. (2022). Nutrient quality and maturity status of frass fertilizer from nine edible insects. Sci. Rep. 12:7182. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-11336-z
Béné, C., Fanzo, J., Achicanoy, H., and Lundy, M. (2022). Can economic development be a driver of food system sustainability? Empirical evidence from a global sustainability index and a multi-country analysis. PLoS Sustain. Transform. 1:e0000013. doi: 10.1371/journal.pstr.0000013
Bian, H., Boguta, P., Huang, J., Deng, C., Kong, D., Zhou, H., et al. (2024). Transforming organic solid waste management: embracing humification for sustainable resource recovery. ACS Sustain. Resour. Manag. 1, 181–198. doi: 10.1021/acssusresmgt.3c00080
Boonchuay, P., and Bumrungsri, S. (2022). Bat activity in organic rice fields is higher than in conventional fields in landscapes of intermediate complexity. Diversity 14:444. doi: 10.3390/d14060444
Bosch, G., Zanten, H., Zamprogna, A., Veenenbos, M., Meijer, N., Fels-Klerx, H., et al. (2019). Conversion of organic resources by black soldier fly larvae: legislation, efficiency and environmental impact. J. Clean. Prod. 222, 355–363. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.270
Bozdaglar, H. (2023). The effectiveness of community-based tourism initiatives in promoting sustainable tourism development and improving the well-being of local communities. Int. J. Sci. Manag. Stud. 6, 280–286. doi: 10.51386/25815946/ijsms-v6i1p123
Bravo, M., Brandt, M., Grient, J., Dahlgren, T., Esquete, P., Gollner, S., et al. (2023). Insights from the management of offshore energy resources: toward an ecosystem-services based management approach for deep-ocean industries. Front. Mar. Sci. 9:994632. doi: 10.3389/fmars.2022.994632
Broeckx, L., Frooninckx, L., Slegers, L., Berrens, S., Noyens, I., Goossens, S., et al. (2021). Growth of black soldier fly larvae reared on organic side-streams. Sustain. For. 13:12953. doi: 10.3390/su132312953
Candian, V., Savio, C., Meneguz, M., Gasco, L., and Tedeschi, R. (2023). Effect of the rearing diet on gene expression of antimicrobial peptides in hermetia illucens (diptera: stratiomyidae). Insect Sci. 30, 933–946. doi: 10.1111/1744-7917.13165
Carnier, R., Berton, R., Coscione, A., Pires, A., and Corbo, J. (2019). Coffee silverskin and expired coffee powder used as organic fertilizers. Coffee Sci. 14:24. doi: 10.25186/cs.v14i1.1514
Chamoun, L., Karboune, S., Lutterodt, H., and Melgar-Quiñonez, H. (2023). Nutritional composition and consumer acceptance of tomato paste fortified with palm weevil larvae (rhynchophorus phoenicis fabricius) in the Ashanti region, Ghana. Food Sci. Nutr. 11, 4583–4595. doi: 10.1002/fsn3.3418
Chen, X., Tao, T., Zhou, J., Yu, H., Guo, H., and Chen, H. (2023). Simulation and prediction of greenhouse gas emissions from beef cattle. Sustain. For. 15:11994. doi: 10.3390/su151511994
Chiaraluce, G., Bentivoglio, D., and Finco, A. (2021). Circular economy for a sustainable Agri-food supply chain: a review for current trends and future pathways. Sustain. For. 13:9294. doi: 10.3390/su13169294
Chineme, A., and Assefa, G. (2023). Open and closed black soldier fly systems tradeoff analysis. Sustain. For. 15:16677. doi: 10.3390/su152416677
Comerford, K., Miller, G., Kapsak, W., and Brown, K. (2021). The complementary roles for plant-source and animal-source foods in sustainable healthy diets. Nutrients 13:3469. doi: 10.3390/nu13103469
Costanza, R., Groot, R. d., Sutton, P. C., Ploeg, S. v. d., Anderson, S., Kubiszewski, I., et al. (2014). Changes in the global value of ecosystem services. Glob. Environ. Chang. 26, 152–158. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.04.002
Czekała, W., Janczak, D., Cieślik, M., Mazurkiewicz, J., and Pulka, J. (2020). Food waste management using hermetia illucens insect. J. Ecol. Eng. 21, 214–216. doi: 10.12911/22998993/119977
Deng, Y., Zhang, K., Zou, J., Li, X., Wang, Z., and Hu, C. (2022). Electron shuttles enhanced the removal of antibiotics and antibiotic resistance genes in anaerobic systems: a review. Front. Microbiol. 13:1004589. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.1004589
Diachkova, A., Tikhonov, S., Tomyuk, O., and Тихонова, Н. (2022). Criteria for assessing food consumption patterns in the BRICS countries in accordance with sustainable development goals. Bio Web Conf. 42:04005. doi: 10.1051/bioconf/20224204005
Dibia, S., Avula, A., Boniface, M., Orji, A., Kalu, M., Eze-Ufodiama, S., et al. (2022). Assessment of solid waste management practices, challenges and improvement strategies for households and waste managers in southsouth Nigeria. Pollut. Res. 4, 707–717. doi: 10.53550/pr.2022.v41i02.044
Diener, S., Solano, N., Roa-Gutiérrez, F., Zurbrügg, C., and Tockner, K. (2011). Biological treatment of municipal organic waste using black soldier fly larvae. Waste Biomass Valoriz. 2, 357–363. doi: 10.1007/s12649-011-9079-1
Dilts, T., Black, S., Hoyle, S., Jepsen, S., May, E., and Forister, M. (2023). Agricultural margins could enhance landscape connectivity for pollinating insects across the central valley of California, U.S.A. PLoS ONE 18:e0267263. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267263
Doughmi, A., Cherkaoui, E., Khamar, M., and Nounah, A. (2024). Organic waste valorization through composting as part of a circular economy. The Eurasia Proceedings Sci. Technol. Engg. Maths 29, 210–218. doi: 10.55549/epstem.1566173
Duc, T., and Thanh, N. (2023). The relationship between awareness and commitment to participate in the green tourism model of local communities: evidence from the Hmong people community in Lao Cai province - Vietnam. Int. J. Prof. Bus. Rev. 8:e02540. doi: 10.26668/businessreview/2023.v8i6.2540
Ebrahimi, K., and North, L. (2017). Effective strategies for enhancing waste management at university campuses. Int. J. Sustain. High. Educ. 18, 1123–1141. doi: 10.1108/ijshe-01-2016-0017
Egoh, B., Reyers, B., Rouget, M., Bode, M., and Richardson, D. (2009). Spatial congruence between biodiversity and ecosystem services in South Africa. Biol. Conserv. 142, 553–562. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2008.11.009
Eke, M., Tougeron, K., Hamidovic, A., Tinkeu, L., Hance, T., and Renoz, F. (2023). Deciphering the functional diversity of the gut microbiota of the black soldier fly (hermetia illucens): recent advances and future challenges. Anim. Microbiome 5:61. doi: 10.1186/s42523-023-00261-9
Ellawidana, D., Mutucumarana, R. K., and Magamage, M. S. (2023). Nutritional composition and apparent metabolizable energy (AME) value of black soldier fly larvae (Hermetia illucens L.) full-fat meal for broiler chickens. Turkish J. Agric. Food Sci. Technol. 11, 1825–1833. doi: 10.24925/turjaf.v11i10.1825-1833.5992
Estrada-Carmona, N., Sánchez, A., Remans, R., and Jones, S. (2022). Complex agricultural landscapes host more biodiversity than simple ones: a global meta-analysis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 119:e2203385119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2203385119
Evans-Cowley, J., and Arroyo-Rodríguez, A. (2013). Integrating food waste diversion into food systems planning: a case study of the Mississippi Gulf Coast. J. Agric. Food Syst. Community Dev. 2013, 1–19. doi: 10.5304/jafscd.2013.033.003
Ferronato, N., and Torretta, V. (2019). Waste mismanagement in developing countries: a review of global issues. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 16:1060. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16061060
Fowles, T., and Nansen, C. (2019). Artificial selection of insects to bioconvert pre-consumer organic wastes. A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 39:31. doi: 10.1007/s13593-019-0577-z
Froidevaux, J., Louboutin, B., and Jones, G. (2017). Does organic farming enhance biodiversity in Mediterranean vineyards? A case study with bats and arachnids. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 249, 112–122. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2017.08.012
Fu, Q., Li, B., Yang, L., Wu, Z., and Zhang, X. (2015). Ecosystem services evaluation and its spatial characteristics in Central Asia’s arid regions: a case study in Altay prefecture, China. Sustain. For. 7, 8335–8353. doi: 10.3390/su7078335
Fukuda, E. P., Cox, J. R., Wickersham, T. A., and Drewery, M. L. (2022). Evaluation of Black soldier Fly larvae (Hermetia illucens) as a protein supplement for beef steers consuming low-quality forage. Transl. Anim. Sci. 6:txac018. doi: 10.1093/tas/txac018
Garratt, M., Bishop, J., Degani, E., Potts, S., Shaw, R., Shi, A., et al. (2018). Insect pollination as an agronomic input: strategies for oilseed rape production. J. Appl. Ecol. 55, 2834–2842. doi: 10.1111/1365-2664.13153
Gasco, L., Acuti, G., Bani, P., Zotte, A., Danieli, P., Angelis, A., et al. (2020). Insect and fish by-products as sustainable alternatives to conventional animal proteins in animal nutrition. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 19, 360–372. doi: 10.1080/1828051x.2020.1743209
Gilbert, P., Pass, L., Keuroghlian, A., Greenfield, T., and Reisner, S. (2018). Alcohol research with transgender populations: a systematic review and recommendations to strengthen future studies. Drug Alcohol Depend. 186, 138–146. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2018.01.016
Gittman, R., Scyphers, S., Smith, C., Neylan, I., and Grabowski, J. (2016). Ecological consequences of shoreline hardening: a meta-analysis. Bioscience 66, 763–773. doi: 10.1093/biosci/biw091
Gligorescu, A., Fischer, C., Larsen, P., Nørgaard, J., and Heckman, L. (2020). Production and optimization of hermetia illucens (L.) larvae reared on food waste and utilized as feed ingredient. Sustain. For. 12:9864. doi: 10.3390/su12239864
Goyal, S., Esposito, M., and Kapoor, A. (2016). Circular economy business models in developing economies: lessons from India on reduce, recycle, and reuse paradigms. Thunderbird Int. Bus. Rev. 60, 729–740. doi: 10.1002/tie.21883
Guerry, A., Polasky, S., Lubchenco, J., Chaplin-Kramer, R., Daily, G., Griffin, R., et al. (2015). Natural capital and ecosystem services informing decisions: from promise to practice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 112, 7348–7355. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1503751112
Halloran, A., Roos, N., Eilenberg, J., Cerutti, A., and Bruun, S. (2016b). Life cycle assessment of edible insects for food protein: a review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 36:57. doi: 10.1007/s13593-016-0392-8
Halloran, A., Roos, N., and Hanboonsong, Y. (2016a). Cricket farming as a livelihood strategy in Thailand. Geogr. J. 183, 112–124. doi: 10.1111/geoj.12184
Hanes, R., Gopalakrishnan, V., and Bakshi, B. (2017). Synergies and trade-offs in renewable energy landscapes: balancing energy production with economics and ecosystem services. Appl. Energy 199, 25–44. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.04.081
Haupt, M., Kägi, T., and Hellweg, S. (2018). Modular life cycle assessment of municipal solid waste management. Waste Manag. 79, 815–827. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2018.03.035
Hawkey, K., Lopez-Viso, C., Brameld, J., Parr, T., and Salter, A. (2021). Insects: a potential source of protein and other nutrients for feed and food. Annu. Rev. Anim. Biosci. 9, 333–354. doi: 10.1146/annurev-animal-021419-083930
Hilo, Z., Majeed, L., and Talib, N. (2024). Insects save the planet: recycling organic waste and producing proteins in an environmentally friendly way: subject review. J. Entomol. Zool. Stud. 12, 126–130. doi: 10.22271/j.ento.2024.v12.i4b.9357
Hong, J., Jaegler, A., and Gergaud, O. (2023). Mobile applications to reduce food waste in supply chains: a systematic literature review. Br. Food J. 126, 509–530. doi: 10.1108/bfj-09-2022-0742
Huis, A., and Oonincx, D. (2017). The environmental sustainability of insects as food and feed. A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 37:52. doi: 10.1007/s13593-017-0452-8
Hunter, D., Newman, G., and Balgopal, M. (2023). What's in a name? The paradox of citizen science and community science. Front. Ecol. Environ. 21, 244–250. doi: 10.1002/fee.2635
Islam, M., Hasan, S., Hossain, M., Uddin, M., and Mamun, M. (2025). Towards sustainable solutions: effective waste classification framework via enhanced deep convolutional neural networks. PLoS One 20:e0324294. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0324294
Ites, S., Smetana, S., Toepfl, S., and Heinz, V. (2020). Modularity of insect production and processing as a path to efficient and sustainable food waste treatment. J. Clean. Prod. 248:119248. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119248
Jankielsohn, A. (2018). The importance of insects in agricultural ecosystems. Adv. Entomol. 6, 62–73. doi: 10.4236/ae.2018.62006
Jayasinghe, P., Jalilzadeh, H., and Hettiaratchi, P. (2023). The impact of COVID-19 on waste infrastructure: lessons learned and opportunities for a sustainable future. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 20:4310. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20054310
Jereme, I., Siwar, C., Begum, R., and Talib, B. (2016). Addressing the problems of food waste generation in Malaysia. Int. J. Adv. Appl. Sci. 3, 68–77. doi: 10.21833/ijaas.2016.08.012
Johari, S., Nasir, M., Ali, S., Hamza, A., Aleem, W., Ameen, M., et al. (2021). Recent technology developments in biogas production from waste materials in Malaysia. Chembioeng Rev. 8, 564–592. doi: 10.1002/cben.202100016
Joly, G., and Nikiema, J. (2019). Global experiences on waste processing with black soldier fly (hermetia illucens): from technology to business. Colombo, Sri Lanka: International Water Management Institute (IWMI). CGIAR Research Program on Water, Land and Ecosystems (WLE). 62 p.
Juniyanti, L., Purnomo, H., Puspitaloka, D., Andrianto, A., Kusumadewi, S., Okarda, B., et al. (2024). Developing business model with community groups for fire prevention and peatland restoration: a case study of Siak regency. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 1315:012055. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/1315/1/012055
Kanger, K., Guilford, N., Lee, H., Nesbø, C., Truu, J., and Edwards, E. (2020). Antibiotic resistome and microbial community structure during anaerobic co-digestion of food waste, paper and cardboard. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 96:fiaa006. doi: 10.1093/femsec/fiaa006
Kapsdorferova, Z., Švikruhová, P., Dobisova, M., and Medveďová, M. (2021). The food losses and food waste: its impact and initiatives on environmental management in the Slovak Republic. In M. Medveďová (M. Medveďová Ed.), Environmental management in the Slovak Republic. Bratislava, Slovakia: Ministry of the Environment of the Slovak Republic (198–209).
Keeler, B., Dalzell, B., Gourevitch, J., Hawthorne, P., Johnson, K., and Noe, R. (2019). Putting people on the map improves the prioritization of ecosystem services. Front. Ecol. Environ. 17, 151–156. doi: 10.1002/fee.2004
Keeler, B., Polasky, S., Brauman, K., Johnson, K., Finlay, J., O’Neill, A., et al. (2012). Linking water quality and well-being for improved assessment and valuation of ecosystem services. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109, 18619–18624. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1215991109
Khairifa, F., Kholil, S., Syam, A., and Al-Mujahid, N. (2025). Mitigating food waste and household waste management: the potential for redistributing surplus food in the policy communication of Medan city government. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 1445:012047. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/1445/1/012047
Kim, C., Ryu, J., Lee, J., Ko, K., Lee, J., Park, K., et al. (2021). Use of black soldier fly larvae for food waste treatment and energy production in Asian countries: a review. PRO 9:161. doi: 10.3390/pr9010161
Knickmeyer, D. (2020). Social factors influencing household waste separation: a literature review on good practices to improve the recycling performance of urban areas. J. Clean. Prod. 245:118605. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118605
Kovács-Hostyánszki, A., Espíndola, A., Vanbergen, A., Settele, J., Kremen, C., and Dicks, L. (2017). Ecological intensification to mitigate impacts of conventional intensive land use on pollinators and pollination. Ecol. Lett. 20, 673–689. doi: 10.1111/ele.12762
Kovalenko, Y., Росохата, А., Аrtyukhov, А., Нєшева, А., Kazymirova, V., and Havrylenko, O. (2024). Development of waste management systems in the context of energy policy and their impact on ecology and sustainability: the experience of the Scandinavian countries. Econ. Scope. 189, 69–78. doi: 10.32782/2224-6282/189-69
Kremen, C. (2020). Ecological intensification and diversification approaches to maintain biodiversity, ecosystem services and food production in a changing world. Emerg. Top. Life Sci. 4, 229–240. doi: 10.1042/etls20190205
Kremen, C., and Miles, A. (2012). Ecosystem services in biologically diversified versus conventional farming systems: benefits, externalities, and trade-offs. Ecol. Soc. 17:170440. doi: 10.5751/es-05035-170440
Kullan, A., Suresh, A., Choi, H., Gabriel-Neumann, E., and Hassan, F. (2024). Bioconversion of poultry litter into insect meal and organic frasstilizer using black soldier fly larvae as a circular economy model for the poultry industry: a review. Insects 16:12. doi: 10.3390/insects16010012
Li, M., Mao, C., Li, X., Jiang, L., Wen, Z., Li, M., et al. (2023). Edible insects: a new sustainable nutritional resource worth promoting. Food Secur. 12:4073. doi: 10.3390/foods12224073
Li, R., Wang, Q., Qu, G., Zhang, Z., and Wang, H. (2023). Green utilization of organic waste resource. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 30, 8899–8901. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-25127-6
Liao, H., Friman, V., Geisen, S., Zhao, Q., Cui, P., Lü, X., et al. (2019). Horizontal gene transfer and shifts in linked bacterial community composition are associated with maintenance of antibiotic resistance genes during food waste composting. Sci. Total Environ. 660, 841–850. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.353
Lichtenberg, E., Kennedy, C., Kremen, C., Batáry, P., Berendse, F., Bommarco, R., et al. (2017). A global synthesis of the effects of diversified farming systems on arthropod diversity within fields and across agricultural landscapes. Glob. Change Biol. 23, 4946–4957. doi: 10.1111/gcb.13714
Lisboa, H., Nascimento, A., Arruda, A., Sarinho, A., Lima, J., Batista, L., et al. (2024). Unlocking the potential of insect-based proteins: sustainable solutions for global food security and nutrition. Food Secur. 13:1846. doi: 10.3390/foods13121846
Liu, M., Fan, J., Li, Y., and Mao, Q. (2023). Ecosystem service optimisation in the central plains urban agglomeration based on land use structure adjustment. Land 12:1430. doi: 10.3390/land12071430
Liu, T., Wang, P., Zhang, Q., Cao, J., and Wu, Y. (2024). Changes in the environmental impacts of the waste management system after implementing the waste-sorting policy: a Beijing case study. J. Ind. Ecol. 28, 828–839. doi: 10.1111/jiec.13495
Ma, S., Duggan, J., Eichelberger, B., McNally, B., Foster, J., Pepi, E., et al. (2016). Valuation of ecosystem services to inform management of multiple-use landscapes. Ecosyst. Serv. 19, 6–18. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.03.005
MacPherson, J., Voglhuber-Slavinsky, A., Olbrisch, M., Schöbel, P., Dönitz, E., Mouratiadou, I., et al. (2022). Future agricultural systems and the role of digitalization for achieving sustainability goals: a review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 42:70. doi: 10.1007/s13593-022-00792-6
Madau, F., Arru, B., Furesi, R., and Pulina, P. (2020). Insect farming for feed and food production from a circular business model perspective. Sustain. For. 12:5418. doi: 10.3390/su12135418
Martín-López, B., Iniesta-Arandia, I., García-Llorente, M., Palomo, I., Casado-Arzuaga, I., García-del-Amo, D., et al. (2012). Uncovering ecosystem service bundles through social preferences. PLoS One 7:e38970. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0038970
Maseyk, F., Demeter, L., Csergő, A., and Buckley, Y. (2017). Effect of management on natural capital stocks underlying ecosystem service provision: a ‘provider group’ approach. Biodivers. Conserv. 26, 3289–3305. doi: 10.1007/s10531-017-1406-9
Mbelede, K., Akunne, C., Ononye, B., Chidi, C., Okafor, K., Okeke, T., et al. (2023). Diversity of insects of two rice (Oryza sativa l. 1787) farms in Nnamdi Azikiwe university, Awka, Nigeria. Asian J. Biol. 19, 44–56. doi: 10.9734/ajob/2023/v19i3371
Morimoto, J. (2020). Addressing global challenges with unconventional insect ecosystem services: why should humanity care about insect larvae? People Nat. 2, 582–595. doi: 10.1002/pan3.10115
Mouhrim, N., Peguero, D., Green, A., Silva, B., Bhatia, A., Ristic, D., et al. (2023). Optimization models for sustainable insect production chains. J. Insects Food Feed 10, 865–883. doi: 10.1163/23524588-20230148
Munubi, R., and Lamtane, H. (2021). Animal waste and agro-by-products: Valuable resources for producing fish at low costs in sub-Saharan countries. London, United Kingdom: IntechOpen.
Nelson, E., Sander, H., Hawthorne, P., Conte, M., Ennaanay, D., Wolny, S., et al. (2010). Projecting global land-use change and its effect on ecosystem service provision and biodiversity with simple models. PLoS One 5:e14327. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0014327
Noudeng, V., Tran, H., Xuan, T., Teschke, R., and Khanh, T. (2018). Heavy metal accumulation in water, soil, and plants of municipal solid waste landfill in Vientiane, Laos. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 16:22. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16010022
Nyamwasa, I., Li, K., Zhang, S., Yin, J., Li, X., Liu, J., et al. (2020). Overlooked side effects of organic farming inputs attract soil insect crop pests. Ecol. Appl. 30:2084. doi: 10.1002/eap.2084
Ojha, S., Bußler, S., and Schlüter, O. (2020). Food waste valorisation and circular economy concepts in insect production and processing. Waste Manag. 118, 600–609. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2020.09.010
Oktaviani, T., Fauziah, S., and Raharja, M. (2023). Implementation of sustainable waste management with the zero waste concept towards a Banyumas eco-city. Ieibzawa 1, 267–280. doi: 10.24090/ieibzawa.v1i.828
Olatayo, K., Mativenga, P., and Marnewick, A. (2024). Pathways to zero plastic waste landfill: progress toward plastic circularity in South Africa. J. Ind. Ecol. 28, 1270–1288. doi: 10.1111/jiec.13533
Oliveira, L., Oliveira, D., Bezerra, B., Pereira, B., and Battistelle, R. (2017). Environmental analysis of organic waste treatment focusing on composting scenarios. J. Clean. Prod. 155, 229–237. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.093
Oluwatoyin, O. (2018). Assessment of heavy metals contamination in soil due to leachate migration from open dumpsites in Agbor area, Delta state. Nigeria. Pacific Int. J. 1, 199–204. doi: 10.55014/pij.v1i4.76
Ouyang, Z., Song, C., Zheng, H., Polasky, S., Xiao, Y., Bateman, I., et al. (2020). Using gross ecosystem product (GEP) to value nature in decision making. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 117, 14593–14601. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1911439117
Papargyropoulou, E., Lozano, R., Steinberger, J., Wright, N., and Ujang, Z. (2014). The food waste hierarchy as a framework for the management of food surplus and food waste. J. Clean. Prod. 76, 106–115. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.04.020
Paradise, C., Madden, M., and Hedley, L. (2014). Assessment of beetle and bug diversity in extensively managed cattle farms of varying cattle density, sward height, and surrounding land use. Agroecol. Sustain. Food Syst. 39, 19–40. doi: 10.1080/21683565.2014.933152
Pazmiño, M., Hierro, A., and Flores, F. (2023). Genetic diversity and organic waste degrading capacity of hermetia illucens from the evergreen forest of the equatorial Choco lowland. Peerj 11:e14798. doi: 10.7717/peerj.14798
Peer, M., Frooninckx, L., Coudron, C., Berrens, S., Álvarez, C., Deruytter, D., et al. (2021). Valorisation potential of using organic side streams as feed for Tenebrio molitor, Acheta domesticus and Locusta migratoria. Insects 12:796. doi: 10.3390/insects12090796
Pepper, I., Brooks, J., and Gerba, C. (2018). Antibiotic resistant bacteria in municipal wastes: is there reason for concern? Environ. Sci. Technol. 52, 3949–3959. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.7b04360
Pinotti, L., and Ottoboni, M. (2021). Substrate as insect feed for bio-mass production. J. Insects Food Feed 7, 585–596. doi: 10.3920/jiff2020.0110
Platonova, R., Orekhovskaya, N., Dautova, S., Martynenko, E., Kryukova, N., and Demir, S. (2022). Blended learning in higher education: diversifying models and practical recommendations for researchers. Front. Educ. 7:957199. doi: 10.3389/feduc.2022.957199
Pliantiangtam, N., Chundang, P., and Kovitvadhi, A. (2021). Growth performance, waste reduction efficiency and nutritional composition of black soldier fly (hermetia illucens) larvae and prepupae reared on coconut endosperm and soybean curd residue with or without supplementation. Insects 12:682. doi: 10.3390/insects12080682
Pope, C., and Mazmanian, D. (2016). Breastfeeding and postpartum depression: an overview and methodological recommendations for future research. Depress. Res. Treat. 2016, 1–9. doi: 10.1155/2016/4765310
Poveda, J. (2021). Insect frass in the development of sustainable agriculture. A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 41:56. doi: 10.1007/s13593-020-00656-x
Prajapati, A., Patel, J., Trivedi, N., and Kachhadiya, N. (2024). Biodiversity of insects and mites in organic farming system of bottle gourd [lagenaria siceraria (Molina) Standley]. Int. J. Stat. Appl. Math. 9, 43–47. doi: 10.22271/maths.2024.v9.i1sa.1545
Pretorius, B., and Schönfeldt, H. (2023). Opportunities for higher education institutions to develop sustainable food systems in Africa. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 7:1147115. doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2023.1147115
Priyadarshana, M. K. C., Walpita, C. N., Ruwandeepika, D., and Magamage, M. P. S. (2022). Effects of Black soldier Fly, Hermetia illucens (Linnaeus, 1758), larvae incorporated feed on histomorphology, gut microbiota and blood chemistry of cultured fishes: a review. Asian Fish. Sci. 35, 269–281. doi: 10.33997/j.afs.2022.35.3.00
Puiu, S., and Udriștioiu, M. (2023). Environmental volunteering projects management: a multivariate analysis of volunteers’ perspective on the knowledge and skills gained, their involvement in community life and the role of environmental monitoring sensors. Sustain. For. 15:11139. doi: 10.3390/su151411139
Raga, R., and Cossu, R. (2017). Landfill in-situ aeration process and technology. Linnaeus Eco Tech, 43–50. doi: 10.15626/eco-tech.2010.0052017
Rekha, A., Davis, J., Mathew, J., Mathew, D., and Chacko, B. (2022). Household waste reduction efficiency of hermetia illucens larvae. J. Vet. Anim. Sci. 53:181. doi: 10.51966/jvas.2022.53.2.178-181
Reynolds, C., Horton, M., Anankware, J., Perosky, J., Lee, H., Nyanplu, A., et al. (2022). Sustainable palm weevil farming as nutrition supplementation at maternity waiting homes in Liberia. BMC Public Health 22:1313. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13706-8
Rhoades, R., Beebe, L., and Mushtaq, N. (2019). Support for local tobacco policy in a preemptive state. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 16:3378. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16183378
Ringold, P., Boyd, J., Landers, D., and Weber, M. (2013). What data should we collect? A framework for identifying indicators of ecosystem contributions to human well-being. Front. Ecol. Environ. 11, 98–105. doi: 10.1890/110156
Sadessa, Z., and Balo, H. (2025). Municipal solid waste management strategy selection: multi-criteria decision making under uncertainty. J. Future. Sustain. 5, 91–106. doi: 10.5267/j.jfs.2025.4.001
Salemdeeb, R., Daina, M., Reynolds, C., and Al-Tabbaa, A. (2018). An environmental evaluation of food waste downstream management options: a hybrid LCA approach. Int. J. Recyc. Org. Waste Agric. 7, 217–229. doi: 10.1007/s40093-018-0208-8
Sarkodie, S., and Owusu, P. (2020). Impact of Covid-19 pandemic on waste management. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 23, 7951–7960. doi: 10.1007/s10668-020-00956-y
Scharff, H., Soon, H., Taremwa, S., Zegers, D., Dick, B., Zanon, T., et al. (2023). The impact of landfill management approaches on methane emissions. Waste Manag. Res. 42, 1052–1064. doi: 10.1177/0734242x231200742
Schilke, O., Hu, S., and Helfat, C. (2018). Quo vadis, dynamic capabilities? A content-analytic review of the current state of knowledge and recommendations for future research. Acad. Manage. Ann. 12, 390–439. doi: 10.5465/annals.2016.0014
Schmidt, A., Kowitt, S., Myers, A., and Goldstein, A. (2018). Attitudes towards potential new tobacco control regulations among U.S. adults. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 15:72. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15010072
Semernya, L., Ramola, A., Alfthan, B., and Giacovelli, C. (2017). Waste management outlook for mountain regions: sources and solutions. Waste Manag. Res. J. Sustain. Circul. Econ. 35, 935–939. doi: 10.1177/0734242x17709910
Serafini, L., Feliciano, M., Rodrigues, M., and Gonçalves, A. (2023). Systematic review and meta-analysis on the use of LCA to assess the environmental impacts of the composting process. Sustain. For. 15:1394. doi: 10.3390/su15021394
Sfetsas, T., Sarikaki, G., Chioti, A., Tziakas, V., Falaras, P., and Romanos, G. (2023). Fractionation of anaerobic digestion liquid effluents through mechanical treatment and filtration. Sustain. For. 15:11178. doi: 10.3390/su151411178
Shafer, P., Chen, Y., Reynolds, T., and Wettberg, E. (2022). Farm to institution to farm: circular food systems with native entomoculture. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 5:721985. doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2021.721985
Shahrani, A., and Al–Surimi, K. (2018). Daily routine versus on-demand chest radiograph policy and practice in adult ICU patients- clinicians’ perspective. BMC Med. Imaging 18:4. doi: 10.1186/s12880-018-0248-6
Sharma, H., Vanapalli, K., Samal, B., Cheela, V., Dubey, B., and Bhattacharya, J. (2021). Circular economy approach in solid waste management system to achieve UN-SDGs: solutions for post-covid recovery. Sci. Total Environ. 800:149605. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149605
Siddiqui, S., Harahap, I., Osei-Owusu, J., Saikia, T., Wu, Y., Fernando, I., et al. (2024). Bioconversion of organic waste by insects – a comprehensive review. Process. Saf. Environ. Prot. 187, 1–25. doi: 10.1016/j.psep.2024.04.122
Singh, A., Tiwari, R., Joshi, P., and Dutt, T. (2019). Insights into organic waste management practices followed by dairy farmers of Ludhiana district, Punjab: policy challenges and solutions. Waste Manag. Res. 38, 291–299. doi: 10.1177/0734242x19886632
Siregar, M., Raihan, R., and Cahyono, C. (2023). Application of circular economy in manufacturing industry in Indonesia. AMCA J. Commun. Dev. 3, 19–24. doi: 10.51773/ajcd.v3i1.211
Smetana, S. (2023). Circularity and environmental impact of edible insects. J. Insects Food Feed 9, 1111–1114. doi: 10.3920/jiff2023.x0004
Sousa, P., Moreira, M., Moura, A., Lima, R., and Cunha, L. (2021). Consumer perception of the circular economy concept applied to the food domain: an exploratory approach. Sustain. For. 13:11340. doi: 10.3390/su132011340
Starostina, V., Damgaard, A., Rechberger, H., and Christensen, T. (2014). Waste management in the Irkutsk region, Siberia, Russia: environmental assessment of current practice focusing on landfilling. Waste Manag. Res. 32, 389–396. doi: 10.1177/0734242x14526633
Stein-Bachinger, K., Gottwald, F., Haub, A., and Schmidt, E. (2020). To what extent does organic farming promote species richness and abundance in temperate climates? A review. Org. Agric. 11, 1–12. doi: 10.1007/s13165-020-00279-2
Surendra, K., Tomberlin, J., Huis, A., Cammack, J., Heckmann, L., and Khanal, S. (2020). Rethinking organic wastes bioconversion: evaluating the potential of the black soldier fly (hermetia illucens (l.)) (diptera: stratiomyidae) (BSF). Waste Manag. 117, 58–80. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2020.07.050
Sutter, L., and Albrecht, M. (2016). Synergistic interactions of ecosystem services: florivorous pest control boosts crop yield increase through insect pollination. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 283:20152529. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2015.2529
Tahat, M., Alananbeh, K., Othman, Y., and Leskovar, D. (2020). Soil health and sustainable agriculture. Sustain. For. 12:4859. doi: 10.3390/su12124859
Thakali, O., Brooks, J., Shahin, S., Sherchan, S., and Haramoto, E. (2020). Removal of antibiotic resistance genes at two conventional wastewater treatment plants of Louisiana, USA. Water 12:1729. doi: 10.3390/w12061729
Trică, C., Bănacu, C., and Buşu, M. (2019). Environmental factors and sustainability of the circular economy model at the European Union level. Sustain. For. 11:1114. doi: 10.3390/su11041114
Ţucă, O., and Stan, C. (2023). Insects species involved in waste bioconversion and use as animal feed. Ann. Univ. Craiova Ser. Biol. Hortic. Food Prod. Process. Technol. Environ. Eng. 28:64. doi: 10.52846/bihpt.v28i64.84
UNEP (2024). Global waste management outlook 2024 - beyond an age of waste: Turning rubbish into a resource. Nairobi, Kenya: United Nations Environment Programme.
Urra, J., Alkorta, I., and Garbisu, C. (2019). Potential benefits and risks for soil health derived from the use of organic amendments in agriculture. Agronomy 9:542. doi: 10.3390/agronomy9090542
Usapein, P., and Chavalparit, O. (2014). Development of sustainable waste management toward zero landfill waste for the petrochemical industry in Thailand using a comprehensive 3R methodology: a case study. Waste Manag. Res. 32, 509–518. doi: 10.1177/0734242x14533604
Voltolini, G., Silva, L., Alecrim, A., Castanheira, D., Resende, L., Rezende, T., et al. (2020). Soil chemical attributes in coffee growing with different agronomic techniques. Coffee Sci. 15, 1–11. doi: 10.25186/.v15i.1689
Vrontaki, M., Adamaki-Sotiraki, C., Rumbos, C., Anastasiadis, A., and Athanassiou, C. (2024). Bridging the gap: scaling up the sustainable production of the yellow mealworm with agricultural by-products—insights into larval growth and body composition. Agriculture 14:520. doi: 10.3390/agriculture14040520
Wang, T., Marynak, K., Gentzke, A., and King, B. (2019). U.S. adult attitudes about electronic vapor product use in indoor public places. Am. J. Prev. Med. 56, 134–140. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.08.022
Wang, Y., and Shelomi, M. (2017). Review of black soldier fly (hermetia illucens) as animal feed and human food. Food Secur. 6:91. doi: 10.3390/foods6100091
Wazzan, M., Algazzawi, D., Bamasaq, O., Albeshri, A., and Cheng, L. (2021). Internet of things botnet detection approaches: analysis and recommendations for future research. Appl. Sci. 11:5713. doi: 10.3390/app11125713
Yalçınkaya, S., and Kırtıloğlu, O. (2019). Development of a GIS based multicriteria decision support system for organic waste management: Izmir case study. in Proceedings of the 4th World Congress on Civil, Structural, and Environmental Engineering (CSEE ‘19), Rome, Italy. (Rome, Italy: International Center for Environmental Pollution, Technology and Policy).
Zhao, Q., and Wang, Q. (2021). Water ecosystem service quality evaluation and value assessment of Taihu lake in China. Water 13:618. doi: 10.3390/w13050618
Zou, T., Dawodu, A., Mangi, E., and Cheshmehzangi, A. (2023). Exploring current trends, gaps and challenges in sustainable food systems studies: the need of developing urban food systems frameworks for sustainable cities. Sustain. For. 15:10248. doi: 10.3390/su151310248
Zubair, M., Li, Z., Zhu, R., Wang, J., Liu, X., and Liu, X. (2023). The antibiotics degradation and its mechanisms during the livestock manure anaerobic digestion. Molecules 28:4090. doi: 10.3390/molecules28104090
Keywords: ecosystem services, insect farming, inset-based organic waste management (IBOWM), regulatory frameworks, sustainable food production, waste reduction
Citation: Ayompe LM, Masso C, Epie WN, Crook ED and Egoh BN (2025) Insect-based organic waste management: a sustainable pathway to enhanced ecosystem services and food security. Front. Sustain. 6:1620925. doi: 10.3389/frsus.2025.1620925
Edited by:
Ales Lapanje, Institut Jožef Stefan (IJS), SloveniaReviewed by:
Muhammad IDRIS, Andalas University, IndonesiaManjula Magamage, Sabaragamuwa University, Sri Lanka
Copyright © 2025 Ayompe, Masso, Epie, Crook and Egoh. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Lacour M. Ayompe, bWxhY291ckB1Y2kuZWR1