Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Sustain.

Sec. Waste Management

Sustainable management of simulated coffee processing wastewater using micro-aeration enhanced anaerobic digestion: A long-term technical evaluation

Provisionally accepted
  • 1University of Georgia, Athens, United States
  • 2New Materials Institute, University of Georgia, Athens, United States
  • 3Institute for Integrative and Precision Agriculture, University of Georgia, Athens, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Coffee bean production generates high volumes of contaminated processing water in regions of the world that often lack the necessary infrastructure to provide adequate treatment. This coffee processing water (CPW) contains high organic loads alongside ecopharmokinetic and recalcitrant compounds, such as caffeine and tannins, which, when discharged, pollute the environment and degrade freshwater supplies that nearby populations may depend on. In this study, an anaerobic digestion (AD) reactor and a micro-aeration enhanced anaerobic digestion (MA-AD) reactor were operated in parallel for 430 days to compare their effectiveness in treating and valorizing simulated CPW to promote a more sustainable approach to coffee production. In coffee-producing regions where access to centralized wastewater treatment facilities is limited, MA-AD offers a technologically and economically accessible option that can be implemented by industrial-scale coffee processors as well as small-to medium-scale processors in rural settings with limited technical infrastructure. To test this, oxygen was intermittently dosed into an AD microbiome, allowing for a comparative assessment across anaerobic and micro-aerobic redox regimes. While both conventional AD and MA-AD achieved comparable reductions in total and volatile solids (>48% and >60%, respectively) and total and soluble chemical oxygen demand (>66% and >86%, respectively), MA-AD exhibited significantly higher total suspended solids concentrations and turbidity in later phases, likely due to gas sparging-induced floc disruption and particulate release. pH profiles indicated a shift toward increased acidification under MA-AD, without compromising process stability, with both reactors stabilizing between pH 6.8 and 7.1. Caffeine degradation was accelerated under MA-AD at the lowest O2 dosing level (28.73 ± 1.10 mL O₂⋅d⁻¹⋅Lreactor⁻¹) after spiking caffeine (>85% removal in 28 h), and decreased at higher O2 dosing levels (100.73 ± 6.90 mL O₂⋅d⁻¹⋅Lreactor⁻¹; 228.60 ± 3.92 mL O₂⋅d⁻¹⋅Lreactor⁻¹). Finally, methane production was consistently lower in MA-AD, attributed to the oxygen sensitivity of methanogens and possible substrate competition. These results underscore the importance of oxygen dose regulation, redox control, and microbial adaptation in optimizing MA-AD performance. The findings support MA-AD as a promising strategy for ensuring a safer and more sustainable water supply by enhancing the treatment of ecopharmokinetic and recalcitrant compounds in CPW.

Keywords: Sustainable coffee production, Clean water, Responsible Production, effluent quality, Microaeration, Caffeine degradation

Received: 06 Aug 2025; Accepted: 11 Nov 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Taiwo, Ogundipe, Kerr, Pegg, Suh and Usack. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Joseph G Usack, joseph.usack@uga.edu

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.