METHODS article
Front. Sustain. Cities
Sec. Innovation and Governance
This article is part of the Research TopicBarriers and Enablers to Effective Climate Governance in CitiesView all 11 articles
Integrating Climate Mitigation and Adaptation at the District Level: Co-Creating a Transition Guideline for Urban Climate Action in Munster
Provisionally accepted- 1University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany
- 2Buro Happold GmbH, Berlin, Germany
- 3University of Cambridge, Centre of Sustainable Development, Department of Engineering, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- 4Fraunhofer-Institut fur Arbeitswirtschaft und Organisation IAO, Stuttgart, Germany
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Cities are central to climate action, with the district scale serving as a promising level for implementing climate interventions. However, municipal administrations often face significant barriers in integrating mitigation and adaptation strategies due to siloed departmental structures that limit effective collaboration. This article examines how the City of Munster, Germany, developed a Transition Guideline to systematically integrate climate mitigation and adaptation for existing urban districts through co-creative processes within municipal administration. Using a qualitative mixed-methods approach, a baseline analysis revealed critical organizational barriers: fragmented interdepartmental communication, misaligned data structures, and absence of systematic guidance for transforming existing building stock at the district level. Building on these findings, the City of Munster adapted the Climate Proofing approach – a five-step iterative framework for integrated climate action – into a practical guideline tailored to local governance structures. The resulting Transition Guideline consolidates available climate data, tools, and resources through interactive checklists that guide practitioners through integrated planning cycles while embedding co-creation as a core governance principle. Key findings demonstrate that structured co-creative frameworks have the potential to overcome institutional silos, though persistent gaps remain in district-scale carbon accounting and political engagement. This research provides a replicable methodological approach for municipalities seeking to bridge the gap between ambitious climate targets and implementation capacity at the district scale.
Keywords: Climate Change, urban planning, mitigation, adaptation, co-creation, ClimateProofing, Carbon accounting, District Level Interventions
Received: 07 Jul 2025; Accepted: 12 Nov 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Krumm, Rossi, Leithner, Theobald, Brown, Fernandez and Scheibstock. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Alisa Krumm, alisa.krumm@iat.uni-stuttgart.de
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
