Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Trop. Dis.

Sec. Tropical Disease Epidemiology and Ecology

Volume 6 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fitd.2025.1641807

This article is part of the Research TopicUnderstanding Glocalisation in Vector-Borne Disease Dynamics and EcologyView all 5 articles

Predicting the ecological niches of Aedes aegypti s.l. using Maximum Entropy in Kenya

Provisionally accepted
  • 1Department of Geomatic Engineering and Geospatial Information Systems, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, Nairobi, Kenya
  • 2Population and Health Impact Surveillance Group, KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Nairobi, Kenya
  • 3Data and Statistics, KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Nairobi, Kenya, Nairobi, Kenya
  • 4Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
  • 5Spatial Epidemiology Lab (SpELL), Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium, Brussels, Belgium
  • 6Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, Rega Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
  • 7Interuniversity Institute of Bioinformatics in Brussels, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: To evaluate the human population at risk of arboviral illnesses and improve vector and disease surveillance, it is crucial to model the probability of occurrence of impactful mosquitoes such as Aedes aegypti sensu lato (s.l.) which transmits dengue and Chikungunya etc. While majority of studies on Aedes distributions have focused on global ecological niche modelling (ENM), there is need to build local vector niche models using national data to design targeted vector surveillance and control strategies. Here, we built a spatial inventory of Aedes aegypti s.l. and applied a national-wide ENM approach to predict the probability of occurrence of Ae. aegypti s.l. across Kenya. Methods: Occurrence data on Aedes aegypti s.l. from 2000 to 2024 were assembled from the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF), Walter Reed Biosystematics Unit's (WRBU) VectorMap, and online literature searches. A maximum entropy approach was used to predict Ae. aegypti s.l. probability of occurrence in Kenya for 2024 at ~5 x 5 km resolution, using the occurrence data assembled and environmental covariates: population density, daytime and nighttime land surface temperature (LST), enhanced vegetation index (EVI), elevation, and land cover. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC) metric. Results: A total of 291 unique locations reported positive identification of Ae. aegypti s.l. Population density, daytime and nighttime LST were the most influential predictors. The models predicted high probabilities of occurrence of Ae. aegypti s.l. along the coast, northeastern and western Kenya, and in urban centres, while lower probabilities were predicted in sparsely populated areas. The models achieved a mean AUC value of 0.732 (0.653-0.779), indicating a moderate performance. Conclusion: The predicted distribution of Ae. aegypti s.l. can guide vector surveillance in high-risk areas and help identify populations at risk of arboviral diseases like dengue fever and Chikungunya, aiding in future outbreak preparedness.

Keywords: Aedes aegypti, Ecological Niche Modelling, maximum entropy, probability of occurrence, Arbovirus

Received: 05 Jun 2025; Accepted: 15 Sep 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Muchiri, Musau, Mwaniki, Kirimi, Agutu, Okiro, Dellicour and Snow. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Samuel K. Muchiri, smuchiri@kemri-wellcome.org

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.