ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Tuberc.
Sec. Diagnosis of Tuberculosis
Volume 3 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/ftubr.2025.1540194
Targeted transcriptomic analyses of Tuberculosis treatment response and outcomes in The Gambia
Provisionally accepted- 1Vaccines and Immunity Theme, Medical Research Council Unit The Gambia at London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Fajara, Gambia
- 2Division of Experimental Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States
- 3Statistics and Bioinformatics, Medical Research Council Unit The Gambia at London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Fajara, Gambia
- 4Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Munich, Bavaria, Germany
- 5Aurum Institute, Johannesburg, South Africa
- 6German Center for Infection Research (DZIF), Partner site Munich, Braunschweig, Bavaria, Germany
- 7Department of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine, LMU Munich University Hospital, Munich, Bavaria, Germany
- 8Unit Global Health, Helmholtz Zentrum München, German Research Centre for Environmental Health (HMGU), Neuherberg, Germany
- 9Fraunhofer Institute for Translational Medicine and Pharmacology ITMP, Immunology, Infection and Pandemic Research, Türkenstraße 87, 80799, Munich, Germany
- 10Department of Infection Biology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, University of London, London, London, United Kingdom
- 11Vaccine and Immunity theme, Medical Research Council The Gambia Unit (MRC), Banjul, Gambia
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: Despite availability of effective treatment regimens for drug-susceptible TB, some patients still experience poor treatment outcomes. Currently tools for monitoring treatment outcomes are dependent on detection of mycobacteria in sputum, which are slow, expensive and poor at predicting relapse and failure. This study aims to identify new blood-derived markers for predicting treatment response and outcomes. Methods: Whole blood was collected in PAXgene tubes from patients with microbiologically confirmed TB at diagnosis, week 2, and at months 2, 4 and 6. Treatment response and outcomes were determined by culture and gene expression was compared between slow and fast responders; and between patients with good (cured) and poor treatment outcomes (failure and recurrent TB) using targeted RNA gene expression. Gene signatures were developed using random forest classification models.Results: Significant changes in gene expression were detected over the course of the TB treatment. Notably, major gene expression differences were observed at diagnosis between subsequently cured patients and patients who experienced poor treatment outcomes while minimal changes were detected between slow and fast responders among cured patients at diagnosis. A 7-gene end of treatment signature distinguished patients with good outcomes from those with poor treatment outcomes with AUCs of 0.91 (95% CI 0.85-0.99), 0.98 (95% CI 0.96-0.99), and 1.0 (95% CI 0.99-1.00), at baseline, month 2 and month 6 respectively. Additionally, a 6-gene month 2 signature discriminates slow from fast responders with AUCs of 0.49 (95% CI 0.33-0.64), 0.58 (95% CI 0.07-1.00), and 0.93 (95% CI 0.78-1.00) at diagnosis, week 2 and month 2 respectively.The study identified genes signatures associated with TB treatment response and outcomes suggesting potential utility for treatment monitoring.
Keywords: Mycobacterium tuberculosis disease, treatment response, treatment outcome, Tuberculosis, Gene Expression
Received: 06 Dec 2024; Accepted: 28 Jul 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Manneh, Darboe, Jobe, Sarr, Cham, Owolabi, Kotanmi, Rachow, Charalambous, Held, Dockrell and Sutherland. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Ismaila L. Manneh, Vaccines and Immunity Theme, Medical Research Council Unit The Gambia at London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Fajara, Gambia
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.