Longitudinal Radiographic Study of Cranial Bone Growth in Young Cheetah

Abstract

Focal palatitis (also known as focal palatine erosion) is thought to be a developmental disease, specifically of cheetah in captivity raised on a commercial diet. The lack of chewing is thought to cause the mandibular molar to change angulation, contacting the palate and causing the lesions. We followed the development of five captive cheetah cubs, born within 2 weeks of each other, at the same facility. This longitudinal study followed the cubs cephalometrically from 7-months-old to 25-months-old. Of each cub we made a lateral and dorsoventral radiograph at 7, 13, 20, and 25-months-old. For each radiograph at each age, a predefined series of measurements were made including the angle of the molar. The latter was measured as the angle of the bisecting line running through the apex of the caudal molar root intersecting with a line drawn at the ventral margin of the mandible. The results confirmed that the cheetah skull and neurocranium follows the same neural growth pattern as has been described for other mammalians. Similarly the maxillofacial component follows the same somatic growth as seen in all mammalians excluding humans and non-human primates, where a pubertal growth spurt is present. Finally the angle of the mandibular molar at 7 months differed significantly from the angle at the other ages, however there were no statistical difference in the angulation of the molar after eruption (13 months and older ages). In these five cheetah the lack of chewing (as seen in captivity with a commercial or meat only based diet) did not alter the angulation of the mandibular molar, nor did the mandibular molars super erupt in these patients at 25-months-of-age.

Introduction

Focal palatitis FP [formerly focal palatine erosion (FPE)] (1) lesions in cheetahs have been described as a developmental condition (2). It is characterized by erosion of the oral mucosa and by a localized osteomyelitis of the palatine bone in advanced stages of the disease (3). The pathophysiology of FP is not fully understood. The original description of FPE concluded that the molar supposedly erupts higher (super eruption) than normal and changes its angulation mesially thereby contacting the palate and causing the lesions. The change in angulation of the molars was ascribed to a captive diet without tough texture thereby shortening the duration and intensity of the chewing action in these animals (3). The latter opinion has been challenged and an alternative pathogenesis has been put forward by Steenkamp (1). It is believed that the normal indentations occurring on the palate of cheetah may trap food or other foreign bodies. The ensuing infection and associated inflammation may then ultimately cause localized osteomyelitis, which may progress to oro-nasal fistulas at some of these palatal indentations—often associated with the mandibular molar's indentation, palatal to the maxillary 4th premolar tooth (4).

Whereas radiographic and tomographic imaging methods were used to study the general morphology of dog skulls (5, 6) and pigs (7), data about cranio-maxillofacial growth in the ontogeny of large felids are not available. Once such a longitudinal cephalometric description exists for the cheetah, it will be possible to utilize the observed growth pattern in order to document real time changes taking place.

In this study we document the growth of the cranio-maxillofacial complex in cheetah from 7 to 25-months-of-age using repetitive radiographic examination. General growth trajectories as well as the eruption of the mandibular molar in the cheetah in particular are investigated, in order to clarify the developmental aspect of FP.

Materials and Methods

Five captive bred cheetah cubs, all born within 2 weeks from one another and belonging to two different litters were used for this study. They originated from the Ann van Dyk Cheetah Center 30 km northwest of Pretoria. The diet of the cubs consisted of milk from the females up to 8 weeks old. A diet consisting of boiled minced chicken supplemented with 30 g of a commercial cat food, egg, milk, vitamin, and mineral supplements was then introduced and fed until the cubs were 3 months-old. From then on, the diet consisted of chicken or horse meat, supplemented with a vitamin, and mineral powder.

From 7-months-of-age they were anesthetized according to the institution's protocols, on average every 6 months (6, 7, and 5 months) until they were 25-months-of-age. The latter age was selected as the animals are thought to be fully grown by 24-months-of-age. Furthermore, at 24-months-old, the animals are often divided into breeding groups or animals that will be sold and no further access to the animals was possible. At each of these anesthetic events, a lateral and dorsoventral skull radiograph was made. A 10 cm radiographic guide was placed on the detector plate with the skull to be radiographed, at a level central to the skull. This was done for future use in correcting for any image distortion that may take place.

Radiographic images were made using a Shimadzu MD 100 x-ray machine (Axim, Corporate Park South, Midrand, South Africa) and a Carestream Vita CR computed radiography (CR) system (Lomaen Medical, Edenvale, South Africa) at a film focal distance (FFD) of 100 cm. Detailed exposure settings are summarized in Table 1. The radiographic system used to acquire the pictures of the first three visits was not available for the final evaluation. We were not able to source a similar machine and therefore a digital direct radiography (DR) (and not CR) system was used (Leonardo DR Systems, OR Technology, Rostock, Germany).

The study was approved by the University of Pretoria's Animal Ethics Committee (Project: EC062-11). All the measurements were made utilizing specific software (KPACS, IMAGE Information Systems Ltd., London, United Kingdom) and recorded in a spreadsheet developed for this purpose.

Figure 1

Figure 2

Figure 3

Figure 4

The distances measured as described in Table 2, were then used to record a number of indices (Table 3). From the length and width measurements, growth rate was determined using the formula:

Statistical analysis, including hypothesis testing, was done using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 23.0 (IBM Corporation, New York, New York, USA). Results were interpreted as moderately significant (p-value < 0.1), significant (p-value < 0.05), and highly significant (p-value < 0.01).

Results

The five healthy cheetah cubs comprised of two female (F662, F669) and three male cubs (M661, M668, M673). They were born to two different litters, but within 2 weeks of each another. All cubs were raised in the same institution with the same feeding regime. At the time of evaluation all cubs appeared clinically healthy and their body scores were appropriate for their age. Initially we intended to use four male and four female cubs, but in the following 2 years after the project started no litters were born at the facility. Therefore a decision was made to use the available data.

The results of the measurements obtained on each cheetah cub skull at each of the four evaluation times, including standard deviations, medians and 1st and 3rd quartiles, are given in Table 4. All length and width measurements of the skull and mandible showed similar trends with a marked increase in length/width between the 7 and 13th month observations whereafter growth rate stabilized. Maxillary width did not follow this pattern with the growth rate between the 7th to 13th month and 13th to 20 month very similar.

Mandible height did not show a similar acceleration between 7 and 13 months. There was a more gradual increase in height over the 18-month period of evaluation (Table 4).

Eruption angles of the mandibular molar at the four observation times are also given in Table 4. Using Friedman's test we show that there was a significant difference in eruption angles of the five cheetah cubs evaluated (p-value = 0.017). Further evaluation using Dunn's multiple comparison indicated a moderately significant difference (p-value = 0.086) between the molar angles at age 7 months (molar unerupted but visible) compared to all the other observation times (7 vs. 13 months, 7 vs. 20 months, and 7 vs. 25 months) where the molars were fully erupted. No significant change in the molar angle occurred during the last three observations.

A total of 13 indices was calculated in order to quantify the neurocranium and facial growth in the five cheetah cubs during the 18 months of the study. The index values as well as the means, medians, standard deviations and 1st and 3rd quartiles are given in Table 5.

From these indices two patterns of development were evident:

1. An alternating pattern where the one component of the index developed quicker for one interval, followed by another interval where the second component to the index predominated, and ending with a final interval where the initial component predominated. This type of development occurred for the following indices: Palate1 (Figure 5), Palate2, Palate-Man1 and Palate-Man2.

Figure 5

2. A gradual pattern where one component of the index developed quicker at every interval measured. The gradual pattern either had a positive (increasing) or negative (decreasing) slope. This type of development characterized by a gradual increasing pattern was seen in the following indices: Facial1 (Figure 6), Facial2, Facial3, Facial4, Facial5, and Facial6.

Figure 6

A similar gradual pattern of development, but with a negative inclination (decreasing), was seen for Maxilla:Skull width only (Figure 7).

Figure 7

Seven of the indices measured showed significant differences between the different evaluation times. The outcomes of Friedman's test and Dunn's multiple comparisons in testing for differences between these indices are given in Table 6.

Discussion

Longitudinal studies work best with large sample sizes. However, generating data from large sample sizes of an endangered species like cheetah for a longitudinal study poses significant challenges. As a result, we described the findings for this small group of cheetah, mindful that studies using larger cheetah numbers could possibly produce different results.

In the five young cheetah from the Ann van Dyk cheetah center, the cranio-maxillofacial parameters measured closely follows the skeletal development pattern (1). The maximum growth rate for all cranio-maxillofacial measurements was reached within the 7 to 13 month interval. Maxilla width and mandibular height were the only exception to the growth acceleration recorded during this interval.

In an attempt to describe the growth rate of the various components of the maxillo-facial complex, a series of indices was calculated. From these it was clear that different components of the maxillo-facial complex developed at different rates. The rate of development of the palate, compared to both the condylobasal and total skull lengths, fluctuates and appears to have a faster development than either the aforementioned recorded during the 13 to 20 month interval. A similar pattern of development occurred when comparing the palate length with both mandibular lengths measured for the mandible.

Facial development seems to progress at a higher rate than condylobasal -, total skull - or neurocranium development. This follows a positive near linear relationship (this study). The development of the facial structures, especially those associated with the respiratory and alimentary tracts, as well as the mandible, follows a somatic growth pattern. This is in contrast to the brain, skull, eyeballs, etc., which predominantly follows a neural growth pattern which allows for maximal size to be obtained early in life (12).

Most development in the maxillofacial complex occurs in a rostro-caudal direction with very little development occurring in the width of the skull. This is due to this growth in the maxillofacial complex being only dependent on the intranasal, intermaxillary and median palatal sutures as well as the mandibular symphysis (12). This was indeed the case with our five cheetah where the maxillary width developed slower than the skull width. In addition, a gradual decreasing trend was evident in the index comparing maxilla width to skull width over an 18-month period.

The molar angle changed very little once the tooth was fully erupted. Just prior to eruption (7 months of age) the angle of the molar compared to the ventral mandible is more acute than once erupted. The fact that these captive born cheetah had no significant change in their molar angle over time is significant (this study) and does not support the theory of molar angulation changes to be the cause of FP (previously known as FPE) in the palatine indentations associated with it (3).

The skulls and maxillo-facial complex of the five growing cheetah followed the same neural and somatic growth patterns as have been described before in other mammals, excluding humans and great apes where a pubertal growth spurt of the condylobasal occurs (12). Development in the rostrocaudal direction is more evident than growth in width which again follows the general pattern seen in mammals, excluding humans and the great apes, where a superior/inferior (dorso-ventral) increase in height is more common (12).

Eruption of the mandibular molar teeth occurs after 7 months of age and is in full occlusion by 13 months. Once erupted the molars do not change their angulation. This is in keeping with the unique fact that in the specialized dentition of carnivores teeth do not super erupt or drift once contact with opposing or adjacent teeth is lost (13). The results of the present study could, therefore, not confirm an influence of a captive diet on the position or angulation of the mandibular molars in cheetah.

References

• 1.

  SteenkampG. The Development, Structure and Pathology of the Cheetah Maxillofacial Complex [Doctoral]. Pretoria: University of Pretoria (2017).

  • Google Scholar

• 2.

  MarkerLLDickmanAJ. Dental anomalies and incidence of palatal erosion in Namibian cheetahs (Acinonyx jubatus jubatus). J Mammal. (2004) 85:19–24. 10.1644/1545-1542(2004)085<0019:DAAIOP>2.0.CO;2

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 3.

  FitchHMFaganD. Focal palatine erosion associated with dental malocclusion in captive cheetahs. Zoo Biol. (1982) 1:295–310. 10.1002/zoo.1430010403

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 4.

  SteenkampGBoySCvan StadenPJBesterMN. How the cheetahs' specialised palate accommodates its abnormally large teeth. J Zool. (2016) 301:290–300. 10.1111/jzo.12422

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 5.

  RegodonSVivoJMFrancoAGuillenMTRobinaA. Craniofacial angle in dolicho-, meso- and brachycephalic dogs: radiological determination and application. Ann Anat. (1993) 175:361–3. 10.1016/S0940-9602(11)80043-9

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 6.

  SchmidtMNeumannAAmortKFailingKKramerM. Cepahlometric measurements and determination of general skull type of Cavalier King Charles Spaniels. Veterin Radiol Ultrasound. (2011) 52:436–40. 10.1111/j.1740-8261.2011.01825.x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 7.

  WenhamGFowlerVR. A radiographic study of age changes in the skull, mandible and teeth of pigs. J Agric Sci. (1973) 80:451–61. 10.1017/S002185960005810X

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 8.

  LoskenAMooneyMPSiegelMI. A comparative study of mandibular growth patterns in seven animal models in seven animal models. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. (1992) 50:490–5. 10.1016/S0278-2391(10)80322-2

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 9.

  EvansHE. Miller's Anatomy of the Dog. 3rd ed. Toronto: W. B. Saunders (1993).

  • Google Scholar

• 10.

  StalmansKVan ErumRVerdonckANadjmiNSchepersESchoenaersJet al. Cephalometric evaluation of maxillary advancement with an internal distractor in an adult boxer dog. Orthod Craniofac Res. (2003) 6:104–11. 10.1034/j.1600-0854.2003.c250.x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 11.

  OnarVBelliOOwenPR. Morphometric Examination of Red Fox (Vulpes vulpes) from the Van-Yoncatepe Necropolis in Eastern Anatolia. Int J Morphol. (2005) 23:253–60. 10.4067/S0717-95022005000300011

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 12.

  MooreWJ. Skull growth. The mammalian skull. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (2009). p. 283–323.

  • Google Scholar

• 13.

  KerteszP. Comparative odontology. A colour atlas veterinary dentistry & oral surgery. London: Wolfe Publishing (1993). p. 35–50.

  • Google Scholar