Abstract
Premature degeneration of the intervertebral disc and its association with specific chondrodystrophic dog breeds has been recognized for over a century. Several lines of evidence including disease breed predisposition, studies suggesting heritability of premature intervertebral disc degeneration (IVDD) and association of a dog chromosome 12 (CFA 12) locus with intervertebral disc calcification have strongly supported a genetic component in IVDD in dogs. Recent studies documenting association of IVDD with an overexpressing FGF4 retrogene on CFA 12 have opened up new areas of investigation to further define the pathophysiology of premature IVDD. While preliminary data from studies investigating FGF4 retrogenes in IVDD implicate FGF4 overexpression as a major disease factor, they have also highlighted knowledge gaps in our understanding of intervertebral disc herniation which is a complex and multifactorial disease process.
Introduction
The list of inherited neurological disorders in companion and production animals is ever expanding. There are over 120 known genetic variants for neurological disorders in dogs alone (), and with advances in molecular genetic technology and consistently decreasing costs, the list is continuing to expand at a rapid rate. Many of these disorders are associated with breed specific syndromes and have a relatively “localized” effect on the health of the overall dog population. The vast phenotypic diversity within domesticated dogs is the result of selection for genetic variants that define key traits such as skeletal size, body size, skull shape, snout length, coat color, leg length, and other breed-defining characteristics (, ). Beyond the “desirable” morphological traits, undesirable “disease” syndromes may be associated with these genetic loci due to either multiple phenotypic sequelae of specific variants, or associated genetic variants carried within long regions of linkage disequilibrium. This can be particularly problematic when disease causing genes define key characteristics of the breed e.g., leg length or head shape resulting in the variant being essentially fixed (homozygous for the associated allele) in a majority if not all animals within certain breeds; premature degeneration of the intervertebral disc (IVD) in chondrodystrophic dog breeds provides a quintessential example of this dilemma. The high penetrance of intervertebral disc disease (IVDD) associated genes in many popular dog breeds presents a daunting clinical challenge and results in millions, if not billions of dollars of annual veterinary treatment-related expense and suffering. However, as with the profound impact of preventative and screening practices in cancer medicine, the potential for genetic interventions to have dramatic effects on clinical IVDD in dogs far outweighs any likely impacts from advances in specific treatments.
“Short Limbed” Dogs and IVDD
Extreme differences in limb length define many of the dog breeds around the world, and the association between specific “short-legged” breeds and premature intervertebral disc degeneration has been documented since the early twentieth century [referenced in (, )] Skeletal dysplasia is a general term describing abnormalities of growth and development of cartilage and/or bone and associated alterations in stature (, ). The molecular genetic underpinnings of limb length variability in dog breeds are becoming more completely understood although many unexplained types of skeletal dysplasia remain. Several skeletal dysplasias in specific dog breeds have been associated with mutations in members of the collagen gene family or its binding proteins (–), fibrilin related protein (), as well as an altered sulfate transporter protein (). However, overexpression of FGF4 associated with insertion of FGF4 retrogenes on CFA12 and CFA18 appear to have broader influences on limb length across many breeds and are the only genes to have been implicated in body size in across-breed association studies (, –). While many breed specific mutations are considered undesirable (–, ) some of these genes have been under positive selection in specific breeds due to their effects on height, despite associated pathologies including glaucoma and IVDD (, ).
Terminology applied to skeletal dysplasia subgroups can be confusing; the term chondrodysplasia covers a broad group of skeletal dysplasia disorders in humans with abnormal development of the endochondral components of the skeletal system (present at birth) and has been used to describe extreme differences in limb length in several dog breeds, such as the Basset Hound, Dachshund, and Pekingese (). Historically, the term chondrodystrophy has been applied as a more general terminology to include terms such as chondrodysplasia. In the veterinary literature it has come to be used as a term describing “short limbed” dogs with skeletal dysplasia that additionally have progressive degeneration of the intervertebral disc after birth, with the progressive nature of the IVDD informing the use of the term “dystrophy” (, , ). While the genetic alterations listed above have all been associated with altered limb length, only the overexpression of FGF4 secondary to retrogene insertion on CFA12 has also been specifically associated with premature degeneration of the intervertebral disc ().
The FGF4 Gene
FGF4 is one of a family of 18 secreted canonical FGF proteins that interact with 4 signaling tyrosine kinase FGF receptors (FGFR1-4) (). The FGF4 subfamily (FGF4,5,6) bind to receptors expressed predominantly in mesenchymal tissues (FGFR1c, 2c, 3c, 4), and as with most FGFs they have important roles in early stages of embryonic development and organogenesis (). Fibroblast Growth Factor 4 is most highly expressed in the embryonic ectoderm, axial, paraxial, and lateral plate mesoderm, and tail bud (). Later in development, Fgf4 is highly expressed in the apical ectodermal ridge of the developing limb bud, as well as somites, which go on to form the vertebral column and non-nuclear components of the intervertebral disc (–). FGF signaling is required for proper embryonic axial growth and segmentation and Fgf4Fgf8 murine hypomorphs are characterized by altered vertebral morphology and smaller limb buds (, ). In a mouse model, creation of a gain of function Fgf4 copy to replace an inactive Fgf8 gene was able to rescue limb development; however, it also caused abnormal tissue deposition and postaxial polydactyly, highlighting that levels of FGF proteins throughout embryonic development must be properly controlled for normal limb formation (). FGF signaling is important in development of the ear, and both Fgf4 and Fgfr1 are expressed in embryonic structures that give rise to the pinna (, ). Hypomorphic alleles of Fgf4 and Fgfr1c (, ) both result in reduced pinna size although it is unclear whether FGF4 overexpression specifically results in increased pinna size as is common in many chondrodystrophic dog breeds. Expression of Fgf4 is not documented specifically in the nucleus pulposus during development (, , ), however FGF signaling is involved in the differentiation of notochordal cells (), is present in the developing end plate and annulus fibrosus () and mutual interaction between the notochord and vertebral bodies are instrumental in the proper formation of the IVD ().
FGF4 Retrogenes
Two separate retrogenes, derived from the parental FGF4 gene on CFA18, have been described in dogs resulting in various degrees of skeletal dysplasia and disproportionate dwarfism (, ). An FGF4 retrogene on CFA18, 25 Mb from the parental gene, associated with marked limb length variation (), and an FGF4 retrogene on CFA12 associated with chondrodystrophy characterized by moderate variation in limb length and an odds ratio of 51.23 (95% CI = 46.69, 56.20) for Hansen Type I intervertebral disc disease (). The CFA12 FGF4 retrogene was identified concurrently by separate genome wide association studies investigating alteration in limb length in Nova Scotia Duck Tolling Retrievers and with IVDD across breeds (). The same chromosomal region had previously been identified associated with limb morphology in Portuguese Water Dogs and intervertebral disc calcification in Dachshunds without defining a causative mutation (, ). Comparatively, activating mutations of the FGFR3, one of the receptors for FGF4, are responsible for some of the most common causes of disproportionate dwarfism in humans including achondroplasia (, ). Intervertebral disc degeneration is also a common finding in human achondroplasia, however histopathological characterization is lacking, and many factors including vertebral malformations, spinal canal stenosis and secondary degenerative changes are a major component of disease pathology ().
Retroposition is a gene duplication mechanism that utilizes an RNA intermediate to randomly insert intronless retrocopies of genes into the genome following reverse transcription (Figure 1) (, ). Reverse transcriptase activity can be provided from a variety of sources, however in mammals it is most commonly associated with long interspersed nuclear elements (LINEs) (). LINEs are one of several types of transposable DNA sequences that have the ability to change their position within a genome. LINEs utilize their own reverse transcriptase activity to copy and paste themselves into new locations, however this activity may also create DNA copies of mRNA from functional genes which, if inserted, may result in retrogene copies. Both of the canine FGF4 retrogenes appear to have arisen from RNA retrotransposed by LINE-1 integrase and reverse transcriptase, including flanking target site duplications (TSDs) and polyA tracts (class 1 templated sequence insertion polymorphism) ().
Figure 1
Retrocopies have historically been considered to be inactive in most cases due to lack of appropriate regulatory elements as well as genetic alterations that remove open reading frames, and documented association with disease states is relatively uncommon. However, retrotransposition is believed to play an important role in genome evolution () and as the field develops, examples of disease related retrotransposition are likely to increase in frequency. Currently only the CFA12 and CFA18 FGF4 retrogenes have been associated with clinical phenotypes in dogs.
The CFA12 FGF4 retrogene is 3,209 bp long (Gen Bank accession no. MF040221) and consists of the parental chromosome 18 FGF4 exons (Figure 1) and a majority of the 5′-untranslated region (UTR) including the transcription start site and cis-regulatory elements including a TATA box, RNA Pol II promoter sequences and many conserved transcription factor binding sites. The insertion is at 33.7 Mb between the OGFRL1 and RIMS1 genes. [The CFA18 FGF4 retrogene is a similar size (2,665 bp) with common 5′ UTR and exons but a shorter 3′ UTR and is inserted within a LINE element on the parental chromosome 18]. The CFA12 FGF4 retrogene is transcriptionally active resulting in a 20-fold increase in FGF expression in neonatal intervertebral disc from dogs homozygous for the CFA12 FGF4 retrogene insertion compared to disc from neonatal dogs with just the parental FGF4 genes (). Although the CFA12 FGF4 retrogene was inserted near sequences with promoter properties, it is more likely that the FGF4-associated CpG island (Figure 1) included in the retrogene and shared with other species, including humans, is driving expression (). CpG islands are genomic regions with a higher frequency of C-G dinucleotides than the genome average, often co-localizing with gene promoters and having important roles in transcriptional regulation. In fact, retrogene expression has been shown to be dependent on the genomic context of its insertion and contribution of CpG islands more than the use of nearby promoters (). Seven of eight genes in the direct neighborhood of the CFA12 FGF4 insertion are actively expressed in neonatal IVD and vertebral body () suggesting that the retrogene was inserted in a gene milieu conducive to expression in IVD. Specific embryonic expression of FGF4 in dogs with 2, 4, or 6 copies of the gene (from parental, or either retrogene) is to be defined, however quantitative and/or tissue specific differences associated with the CFA12 FGF4 retrogene expression may explain the IVD-associated phenotype seen with CFA12 but not the CFA18 FGF4 retrogene expression.
IVDD and FGF4 Retrogenes
Although we have little ancient historical data documenting IVDD prior to the late nineteenth century (), we do know that descriptions of short-legged dog breeds go back over 4000 years (). These include depiction of a short-legged dog on a tomb wall in Egypt (2000 BC), ceramic works of the Colima Dog in Mexico from AD 300-600, the description of the Turnspit in the first English dog book in 1576, and the description of the first Dachshund in Germany in 1735. Although the genetic makeup of these dogs is unknown, it is likely that one or both of the FGF4 retrogenes have been involved in the generation of these ancient short legged phenotypes. Retrotransposition of the FGF4 gene has occurred at least twice in recent history, although the lack of accumulation of mutations in either retrocopy suggest these events are still relatively recent in genomic evolutionary terms. Once the FGF4 retrogene(s) appeared and produced an obvious phenotype, strong selection was likely applied to retain them.
Differential expression of the CFA12 and CFA18 FGF4 retrogenes generally reflects the morphological phenotype and susceptibility to IVDD we recognize in clinical practice (Table 1, Figure 2). Breeds carrying one FGF4 retrogene copy (CFA12 or CFA18) tend to have skeletal dysplasia with moderately short limbs, while those carrying both copies, such as Dachshunds, Corgis and Bassett Hounds, have the most severe form of disproportionate dwarfism. The breeds with a higher frequency of the CFA12 FGF4 insertion are the same breeds identified in the last 50 years as being predisposed to IVDD (, , ). Although the CFA18 FGF4 retrogene is found commonly in breeds that also have the CFA12 FGF4 retrogene and IVDD (Dachshunds, Corgis, Bassett Hounds), it does not appear to be directly associated with development of IVDD since several of the highly susceptible short legged breeds carrying the CFA12 FGF4 retrogene such as Beagles, French Bulldogs and Cocker Spaniels do not carry the CFA18 FGF4 retrogene and interestingly contrast with the short legged breeds such as Cairn Terriers and West Highland White Terriers that are rarely reported to have IVDD and carry only the CFA18 FGF4 retrogene (, , ).
Table 1
| CFA12FGF4Retrogene | CFA18FGF4Retrogene | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breed | Total | 0 | 1 | 2 | Frequency | 0 | 1 | 2 | Frequency |
| Beagle | 29 | 0 | 0 | 29 | 1.00 | 19 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Cavalier King Charles Spaniel | 25 | 0 | 0 | 25 | 1.00 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Clumber Spaniel | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 1.00 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Dachshund | 509 | 0 | 30 | 479 | 0.97 | 3 | 9 | 482 | 0.98 |
| Cocker Spaniel, American | 13 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 0.96 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Cocker Spaniel, English | 14 | 0 | 1 | 13 | 0.96 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Bulldog, French | 113 | 0 | 14 | 99 | 0.94 | 71 | 2 | 0 | 0.01 |
| Dandie Dinmont Terrier | 28 | 1 | 5 | 22 | 0.88 | 0 | 1 | 27 | 0.98 |
| Welsh Corgi, Pembroke | 63 | 3 | 15 | 45 | 0.83 | 0 | 2 | 61 | 0.98 |
| Welsh Corgi, Cardigan | 7 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 0.79 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 0.83 |
| Skye Terrier | 13 | 2 | 2 | 9 | 0.77 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 1.00 |
| Basset Hound | 38 | 3 | 20 | 15 | 0.66 | 1 | 4 | 27 | 0.92 |
| Pekingese | 32 | 5 | 15 | 12 | 0.61 | 1 | 1 | 22 | 0.94 |
| Coton de Tulear | 14 | 3 | 6 | 5 | 0.57 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 0.89 |
| Poodle, Miniature and Toy | 119 | 28 | 46 | 45 | 0.57 | 38 | 10 | 5 | 0.19 |
| Springer Spaniel, English | 23 | 10 | 8 | 5 | 0.39 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Nova Scotia Duck Tolling Retriever | 172 | 69 | 87 | 16 | 0.35 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Shih Tzu | 128 | 69 | 42 | 17 | 0.30 | 0 | 3 | 16 | 0.92 |
| Bichon Frise | 79 | 51 | 23 | 5 | 0.21 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 0.75 |
| Mixed Breed | 678 | 477 | 148 | 53 | 0.19 | 495 | 118 | 65 | 0.18 |
| Chihuahua | 224 | 170 | 46 | 8 | 0.14 | 4 | 15 | 43 | 0.81 |
| Jack Russel Terrier | 14 | 11 | 3 | 0 | 0.11 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0.3 |
| Danish Swedish Farmdog | 29 | 23 | 6 | 0 | 0.10 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Chesapeake Bay Retriever | 41 | 34 | 7 | 0 | 0.09 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Brittany | 17 | 17 | 0 | 0 | 0.07 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Maltese | 95 | 85 | 8 | 2 | 0.06 | 0 | 0 | 27 | 1.00 |
| Pinscher, Miniature | 9 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 0.06 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Schnauzer, Miniature | 9 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 0.06 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Scottish Terrier | 12 | 11 | 1 | 0 | 0.04 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 0.93 |
| Australian Shepherd | 48 | 45 | 3 | 0 | 0.03 | 37 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Yorkshire Terrier | 15 | 14 | 1 | 0 | 0.03 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 1.00 |
| German Shepherd Dog | 25 | 24 | 1 | 0 | 0.02 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Labrador Retriever | 38 | 37 | 1 | 0 | 0.01 | 28 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Australian Cattle Dog | 12 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Bernese Mountain Dog | 11 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Border Collie | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Border Terrier | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Boston Terrier | 7 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Bull Terrier | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Bulldog, English | 13 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Cairn Terrier | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 0.95 |
| Doberman Pinscher | 23 | 23 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Fox Terrier | 12 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 0.13 |
| Golden Retriever | 14 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Great Dane | 13 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Irish Setter | 8 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Newfoundland | 14 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Norwich Terrier | 19 | 19 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 16 | 0.84 |
| Poodle, Standard | 55 | 55 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 30 | 0 | 1 | 0.03 |
| Pug | 9 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Rottweiler | 15 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Shetland Sheepdog | 13 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Siberian Husky | 13 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| St. Bernard | 12 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Weimaraner | 14 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| West Highland White Terrier | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 1.00 |
| Whippet | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
FGF4 retrogene allele frequencies.
Figure 2
FGF4 Gene Dosage
While it is clear that the CFA12 FGF4 retrogene is highly associated with premature chondroid metaplasia and degeneration of the intervertebral discs (
Figure 3

Histopathological images of nucleus pulposus from 10 week-old control (CFA12 FGF4 retrogene –/–) (A, B) and 10 week-old homozygous CFA12 FGF4 retrogene (CFA12 FGF4 retrogene +/+) Nova Scotia (C, D) Duck Tolling Retriever puppies. The control nucleus pulposus has numerous normal physaliferous notochordal cells with foamy to vacuolated cytoplasm and often stellate cytoplasmic processes. By 10 weeks the CFA12 FGF4 retrogene-carrying dog's nucleus pulposus (B) consists predominantly of round to ovoid chondrocyte-like cells arranged either individually or in nodular clusters (arrow) associated with a dark purple chondroid matrix. Normal notochordal cells are rare. Both dogs have zero copies of the CFA18 FGF4 retrogene. H&E stain. Magnification (A, C) = 20X; (B, D) = 100X.
Allele Frequency
Genotyping of over 3,000 dogs from 75 breeds showed that the CFA12 FGF4 retrogene was present in 40 breeds, the CFA18 FGF4 retrogene in 32 breeds and both retrogenes in 23 breeds (Table 1) (
Age Related Factors
Defining age of onset of IVDD is challenging for many reasons, not least because histopathological evidence of premature degeneration is already present in affected dogs before 1 year of age (
Calcification: Type I vs. Type Ii
Calcification/mineralization of intervertebral discs, either surgically or radiographically, is typically used as a surrogate for the presence of Hansen type I vs. Hansen Type II disc disease since it is rarely present in the latter (
Radiographic Screening
Degree of calcification of the IVD has been shown to be heritable in Dachshunds (
Decrease in incidence of calcified discs following selective breeding of Dachshunds based on radiographically defined calcification scores has unfortunately been limited (
The overall dominant role of the CFA12 FGF4 retrogene with heterozygous and homozygous animals potentially having overlapping degrees of IVDD and calcification together with the variables above are likely reflected in the difficulty obtaining rapid reduction in disease using radiographic screening. Although additional genetic variables still remain to be defined, screening strategies based on the CFA12 FGF4 retrogene rather than down-stream phenotypes may offer more tractable selection data for breeding.
IVDD Relative Risk
Prospective data determining the risk for IVDD associated with presence of the CFA12 FGF4 retrogene are still to be collected. Assessment in chondrodystrophic breeds such as Dachshunds, Beagles, and French Bulldogs, with very high allele frequencies preludes analysis in retrospective data. However, evaluation of a small group of surgically treated, mixed breed dogs in which segregation of the retrogene occurred and for which historical control data for aged, clinically unaffected dogs was available has been performed (
What we Don't Know
Several aspects of the clinical presentation of IVDD in dogs are not easily explained by a simple presence or absence of the CFA12 FGF4 retrogene. Clarification of these pathophysiological and clinical variables in the presentation of IVDD is important if genotyping is to be used as a tool for reduction in disease incidence. A more comprehensive picture will also increase breeder and owner confidence for eradication strategies that may potentially require major alterations in breed standards for those breeds with high allele frequencies.
CFA12 FGF4 Retrogene Dosage
Risk for clinical disease based on heterozygous or homozygous retrogene status may be powerful data to inform selective breeding strategies. Circumstantial evidence would suggest that there could be an effect of dosage since calcification scores have been shown to be related to risk for IVDD in Dachshunds and Pekingese dogs (
Breed and Environmental-Related Variables
Variables within and across breeds are strongly suggestive for additional genetic, environmental, morphological or metabolic influences on the pathophysiology of IVDD in dogs. The presence of the CFA12 FGF4 retrogene was associated with a variable risk of presenting for surgery for IVDD from 5.5- to 15.1-fold in different segregating and mixed breeds (
A shorter T1-S1 vertebral column length and shorter limb (calcaneus-patellar) length were associated with increased risk in one study (
Data on prevalence of IVDD by Dachshund type varies between studies (
Breed Related Calcification
Significant variability in presence of radiographically identified disc calcification (accounting for CFA12 FGF4 retrogene presence and other factors) based on breed has been reported (
Breed Related Age Differences
While age at time of surgery for IVDD is significantly lower for CFA12 FGF4 retrogene dogs as a group (
Modifying Effects of Other Retrogenes
Co-expression of the CFA12 and CFA18 FGF4 retrogenes is common in many chondrodystrophic breeds making exclusion of effects of the CFA18 FGF4 retrogene from retrospective data challenging. However, effects of the CFA18 FGF4 retrogene appear to be modest (
The location of a large CpG island in the two FGF4 retrogenes documented to date may facilitate its expression in other chromosomal locations as well. This provokes the question of how many other times the FGF4 gene has been retrotransposed and then eliminated by selective breeding, or if additional retrocopies remain in some breeds and are responsible for other morphological phenotypes or contribute to IVDD.
IVDD in Dogs Without the CFA12 FGF4 Retrogene
Previous studies have described Hansen type I IVDD in non-chondrodystrophic breeds (
Human Genetic Correlates
Canine IVDD has been proposed as a potential model for human degenerative disc disease over many years (
The most critical unanswered question relating to the CFA12 FGF4 retrogene, is what will be the impact of its discovery on the incidence of IVDD in 10–20 years. While it is clear that there are likely to be additional modifying factors, both genetic and environmental, the evidence that the CFA12 FGF4 retrogene is a major factor in the development of IVDD in chondrodystrophic dog breeds is compelling. As causative variants for diseases associated with breed morphological traits are defined, the veterinary profession is being forced to face ethical decisions where the primary mission of the profession (“.prevention and relief of animal suffering…”) may sometimes conflict with dog breeding phenotypic goals.
Positively, some degree of segregation of the CFA12 FGF4 retrogene has been seen in almost all IVDD affected breeds, even those with high allele frequencies. In breeds with a high degree of segregation it should be possible to reduce or eliminate the retrogene from the population.
Even in high allele frequency breeds, such as the Dachshund, there are frequency differences between populations [0.98 in USA/UK samples and 0.94 in Swiss samples (
The dominant nature of the CFA12 FGF4 retrogene on IVDD and the very high allele frequency in some breeds means that eradication may be challenging. The Wire Haired Dachshund was developed through crossbreeding with Schnauzer and Terrier breeds which may explain the lower frequency of the CFA12 susceptibility locus and lower incidence of IVDD in some wire haired populations. Long term strategies may require a combination of testing and selection of heterozygous dogs, outbreeding, cross breeding, and alteration in breed standards, maybe with inclusion of additional CFA12 FGF4 retrogene-negative phenotypes within the breed standards. Whatever the future holds, from a veterinary perspective, current data suggest that breeding priorities should be for dogs with fewer copies of the CFA12 FGF4 retrogene, so that the allele frequency can be reduced.
Statements
Author contributions
All authors listed have made a substantial, direct and intellectual contribution to the work, and approved it for publication.
Acknowledgments
Images and data were provided by Dr. Brian Murphy and Kevin Batcher.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1.
Online Mendelian Inheritance in Animals (OMIA) (2020). Available online at: https://omia.org/. (accessed January 5, 2020)
2.
BoykoARQuignonPLiLSchoenebeckJJDegenhardtJDLohmuellerKEet al. A simple genetic architecture underlies morphological variation in dogs. PLoS Biol. (2010) 8:e1000451. 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000451
3.
HaywardJJCastelhanoMGOliveiraKCCoreyEBalkmanCBaxterTLet al. Complex disease and phenotype mapping in the domestic dog. Nat Commun. (2016) 7:10460. 10.1038/ncomms10460
4.
HansenHJ. A pathologic-anatomical interpretation of disc degeneration in dogs. Acta Orthop Scand. (1951) 20:280–93. 10.3109/17453675108991175
5.
HansenHJ. A pathologic-anatomical study on disc degeneration in dog, with special reference to the so-called enchondrosis intervertebralis. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl. (1952) 11:1–117. 10.3109/ort.1952.23.suppl-11.01
6.
MortierGRCohnDHCormier-DaireVHallCKrakowDMundlosSet al. Nosology and classification of genetic skeletal disorders: 2019 revision. Am J Med Genet A. (2019) 179:2393–419. 10.1002/ajmg.a.61366
7.
WarmanMLCormier-DaireVHallCKrakowDLachmanRLeMerrerMet al. Nosology and classification of genetic skeletal disorders: 2010 revision. Am J Med Genet A. (2011) 155A:943–68. 10.1002/ajmg.a.33909
8.
FrischknechtMNiehof-OellersHJagannathanVOwczarek-LipskaMDrogemullerCDietschiEet al. A COL11A2 mutation in Labrador retrievers with mild disproportionate dwarfism. PLoS ONE. (2013) 8:e60149. 10.1371/journal.pone.0060149
9.
GoldsteinOGuyonRKukekovaAKuznetsovaTNPearce-KellingSEJohnsonJet al. COL9A2 and COL9A3 mutations in canine autosomal recessive oculoskeletal dysplasia. Mamm Genome. (2010) 21:398–408. 10.1007/s00335-010-9276-4
10.
KyostilaKLappalainenAKLohiH. Canine chondrodysplasia caused by a truncating mutation in collagen-binding integrin alpha subunit 10. PLoS ONE. (2013) 8:e75621. 10.1371/journal.pone.0075621
11.
JeanesECOliverJACRickettsSLGouldDJMellershCS. Glaucoma-causing ADAMTS17 mutations are also reproducibly associated with height in two domestic dog breeds: selection for short stature may have contributed to increased prevalence of glaucoma. Canine Genet Epidemiol. (2019) 6:5. 10.1186/s40575-019-0071-6
12.
NeffMWBeckJSKoemanJMBoguslawskiEKefeneLBorgmanAet al. Partial deletion of the sulfate transporter SLC13A1 is associated with an osteochondrodysplasia in the Miniature Poodle breed. PLoS ONE. (2012) 7:e51917. 10.1371/journal.pone.0051917
13.
BrownEADickinsonPJMansourTSturgesBKAguilarMYoungAEet al. FGF4 retrogene on CFA12 is responsible for chondrodystrophy and intervertebral disc disease in dogs. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (2017) 114:11476–81. 10.1073/pnas.1709082114
14.
ParkerHGVonHoldtBMQuignonPMarguliesEHShaoSMosherDSet al. An expressed fgf4 retrogene is associated with breed-defining chondrodysplasia in domestic dogs. Science. (2009) 325:995–8. 10.1126/science.1173275
15.
HaywardJJWhiteMEBoyleMShannonLMCasalMLCastelhanoMGet al. Imputation of canine genotype array data using 365 whole-genome sequences improves power of genome-wide association studies. PLoS Genet. (2019) 15:e1008003. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1008003
16.
PlassaisJKimJDavisBWKaryadiDMHoganANHarrisACet al. Whole genome sequencing of canids reveals genomic regions under selection and variants influencing morphology. Nat Commun. (2019) 10:1489. 10.1038/s41467-019-09373-w
17.
WarburgMMollerHU. Dystrophy: a revised definition. J Med Genet. (1989) 26:769–71. 10.1136/jmg.26.12.769
18.
OrnitzDMItohN. The Fibroblast Growth Factor signaling pathway. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Dev Biol. (2015) 4:215–66. 10.1002/wdev.176
19.
NiswanderLMartinGR. Fgf-4 expression during gastrulation, myogenesis, limb and tooth development in the mouse. Development. (1992) 114:755–68.
20.
SunXMarianiFVMartinGR. Functions of FGF signalling from the apical ectodermal ridge in limb development. Nature. (2002) 418:501–8. 10.1038/nature00902
21.
SivakamasundariVLufkinT. Bridging the gap: understanding embryonic intervertebral disc development. Cell Dev Biol. (2012) 1:103. 10.4172/2168-9296.1000103
22.
BouletAMCapecchiMR. Signaling by FGF4 and FGF8 is required for axial elongation of the mouse embryo. Dev Biol. (2012) 371:235–45. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2012.08.017
23.
LuPMinowadaGMartinGR. Increasing Fgf4 expression in the mouse limb bud causes polysyndactyly and rescues the skeletal defects that result from loss of Fgf8 function. Development. (2006) 133:33–42. 10.1242/dev.02172
24.
TrokovicNTrokovicRMaiPPartanenJ. Fgfr1 regulates patterning of the pharyngeal region. Genes Dev. (2003) 17:141–53. 10.1101/gad.250703
25.
PartanenJSchwartzLRossantJ. Opposite phenotypes of hypomorphic and Y766 phosphorylation site mutations reveal a function for Fgfr1 in anteroposterior patterning of mouse embryos. Genes Dev. (1998) 12:2332–44.
26.
WrightTJMansourSL. FGF signaling in ear development and innervation. Curr Top Dev Biol. (2003) 57:225–59. 10.1016/s0070-2153(03)57008-9
27.
PeckSHMcKeeKKTobiasJWMalhotraNRHarfeBDSmithLJ. Whole transcriptome analysis of notochord-derived cells during embryonic formation of the nucleus pulposus. Sci Rep. (2017) 7:10504. 10.1038/s41598-017-10692-5
28.
DahiaCLMahoneyEJDurraniAAWylieC. Intercellular signaling pathways active during intervertebral disc growth, differentiation, and aging. Spine. (2009) 34:456–62. 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181913e98
29.
ShimauchiYMurakamiSDSatohN. FGF signals are involved in the differentiation of notochord cells and mesenchyme cells of the ascidian Halocynthia roretzi. Development. (2001) 128:2711–21.
30.
QuignonPSchoenebeckJJChaseKParkerHGMosherDSJohnsonGSet al. Fine mapping a locus controlling leg morphology in the domestic dog. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. (2009) 74:327–33. 10.1101/sqb.2009.74.009
31.
MogensenMSKarlskov-MortensenPProschowskyHFLingaasFLappalainenALohiHet al. Genome-wide association study in Dachshund: identification of a major locus affecting intervertebral disc calcification. J Hered. (2011) 102(Suppl. 1):S81–6. 10.1093/jhered/esr021
32.
WebsterMKDonoghueDJ. FGFR activation in skeletal disorders: too much of a good thing. Trends Genet. (1997) 13:178–82. 10.1016/S0168-9525(97)01131-1
33.
HuetTCohen-SolalMLaredoJDColletCBaujatGCormier-DaireVet al. Lumbar spinal stenosis and disc alterations affect the upper lumbar spine in adults with achondroplasia. Sci Rep. (2020) 10:4699. 10.1038/s41598-020-61704-w
34.
MathiasSLScottAFKazazianHHJrBoekeJDGabrielA. Reverse transcriptase encoded by a human transposable element. Science. (1991) 254:1808–10. 10.1126/science.1722352
35.
KubiakMRMakalowskaI. Protein-coding genes' retrocopies and their functions. Viruses. (2017) 9:80. 10.3390/v9040080
36.
OnozawaMGoldbergLAplanPD. Landscape of insertion polymorphisms in the human genome. Genome Biol Evol. (2015) 7:960–8. 10.1093/gbe/evv043
37.
AntequeraF. Structure, function and evolution of CpG island promoters. Cell Mol Life Sci. (2003) 60:1647–58. 10.1007/s00018-003-3088-6
38.
CarelliFNHayakawaTGoYImaiHWarneforsMKaessmannH. The life history of retrocopies illuminates the evolution of new mammalian genes. Genome Res. (2016) 26:301–14. 10.1101/gr.198473.115
39.
DexlerH. Zeitschrift fur Tierheilkunde. (1896) 7:1.
40.
MorrisD. Dogs: A Dictionary of Dog Breeds. North Pomfret, VT: Trafalgar Square Pub (2002).
41.
BraundKGGhoshPTaylorTKLarsenLH. Morphological studies of the canine intervertebral disc. The assignment of the beagle to the achondroplastic classification. Res Vet Sci. (1975) 19:167–72. 10.1016/S0034-5288(18)33527-6
42.
BatcherKDickinsonPGiuffridaMSturgesBVernauKKnipeMet al. Phenotypic effects of FGF4 retrogenes on intervertebral disc disease in dogs. Genes. (2019) 10:435. 10.3390/genes10060435
43.
MurphyBGDickinsonPMarcellin-LittleDJBatcherKRavertySBannaschD. Pathologic features of the intervertebral disc in young nova scotia duck tolling retrievers confirms chondrodystrophy degenerative phenotype associated with genotype. Vet Pathol. (2019) 56:895–902. 10.1177/0300985819868731
44.
BergknutNEgenvallAHagmanRGustasPHazewinkelHAMeijBPet al. Incidence of intervertebral disk degeneration-related diseases and associated mortality rates in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc. (2012) 240:1300–9. 10.2460/javma.240.11.1300
45.
DornMSeathIJ. Neuter status as a risk factor for canine intervertebral disc herniation (IVDH) in dachshunds: a retrospective cohort study. Canine Genet Epidemiol. (2018) 5:11. 10.1186/s40575-018-0067-7
46.
JensenVFErsbollAK. Mechanical factors affecting the occurrence of intervertebral disc calcification in the dachshund–a population study. J Vet Med A Physiol Pathol Clin Med. (2000) 47:283–96. 10.1046/j.1439-0442.2000.00296.x
47.
LappalainenAKVaittinenEJunnilaJLaitinen-VapaavuoriO. Intervertebral disc disease in Dachshunds radiographically screened for intervertebral disc calcifications. Acta Vet Scand. (2014) 56:89. 10.1186/s13028-014-0089-4
48.
LevineJMLevineGJKerwinSCHettlichBFFosgateGT. Association between various physical factors and acute thoracolumbar intervertebral disk extrusion or protrusion in Dachshunds. J Am Vet Med Assoc. (2006) 229:370–5. 10.2460/javma.229.3.370
49.
PackerRMHendricksAVolkHAShihabNKBurnCC. How long and low can you go? Effect of conformation on the risk of thoracolumbar intervertebral disc extrusion in domestic dogs. PLoS ONE. (2013) 8:e69650. 10.1371/journal.pone.0069650
50.
PackerRMSeathIJO'NeillDGDe DeckerSVolkHA. DachsLife 2015: an investigation of lifestyle associations with the risk of intervertebral disc disease in Dachshunds. Canine Genet Epidemiol. (2016) 3:8. 10.1186/s40575-016-0039-8
51.
AikawaTShibataMAsanoMHaraYTagawaMOrimaH. A comparison of thoracolumbar intervertebral disc extrusion in French Bulldogs and Dachshunds and association with congenital vertebral anomalies. Vet Surg. (2014) 43:301–7. 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2014.12102.x
52.
MayousseVDesquilbetLJeandelABlotS. Prevalence of neurological disorders in French bulldog: a retrospective study of 343 cases (2002-2016). BMC Vet Res. (2017) 13:212. 10.1186/s12917-017-1132-2
53.
HansenHJ. Comparative views of the pathology of disk degeneration in animals. Lab Invest. (1959) 8:1242–65.
54.
JensenVFArnbjergJ. Development of intervertebral disk calcification in the dachshund: a prospective longitudinal radiographic study. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc. (2001) 37:274–82. 10.5326/15473317-37-3-274
55.
RohdinCJeserevicJViitmaaRCizinauskasS. Prevalence of radiographic detectable intervertebral disc calcifications in Dachshunds surgically treated for disc extrusion. Acta Vet Scand. (2010) 52:24. 10.1186/1751-0147-52-24
56.
JensenVFChristensenKA. Inheritance of disc calcification in the dachshund. J Vet Med A Physiol Pathol Clin Med. (2000) 47:331–40. 10.1046/j.1439-0442.2000.00297.x
57.
LappalainenAKMakiKLaitinen-VapaavuoriO. Estimate of heritability and genetic trend of intervertebral disc calcification in Dachshunds in Finland. Acta Vet Scand. (2015) 57:78. 10.1186/s13028-015-0170-7
58.
StigenOChristensenK. Calcification of intervertebral disks in the dachshund: an estimation of heritability. Acta Vet Scand. (1993) 34:357–61.
59.
ChaiOHarroshTBdolah-AvramTMazaki-ToviMShamirMH. Characteristics of and risk factors for intervertebral disk extrusions in Pekingese. J Am Vet Med Assoc. (2018) 252:846–51. 10.2460/javma.252.7.846
60.
JensenVFBeckSChristensenKAArnbjergJ. Quantification of the association between intervertebral disk calcification and disk herniation in Dachshunds. J Am Vet Med Assoc. (2008) 233:1090–5. 10.2460/javma.233.7.1090
61.
StigenO. Calcification of intervertebral disks in the dachshund: a radiographic study of 115 dogs at 1 and 5 years of age. Acta Vet Scand. (1996) 37:229–37.
62.
RosenblattAJHillPBDaviesSEWebsterNSLappalainenAKBottemaCDet al. Precision of spinal radiographs as a screening test for intervertebral disc calcification in Dachshunds. Prev Vet Med. (2015) 122:164–73. 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2015.09.015
63.
StigenOKolbjornsenO. Calcification of intervertebral disks in the dachshund: a radiographic and histopathologic study of 20 dogs. Acta Vet Scand. (2007) 49:39. 10.1186/1751-0147-49-39
64.
ProschowskyF. No useful DNA test for disc prolapse this time. Dansk Gravhundenklub Magaz Members Danish Dachshund Club. (2018) 1:12–3.
65.
BostromAChannonSJokinenTJunnilaJHielm-BjorkmanALaitinen-VapaavuoriO. Structural characteristics and predicted functional capacities of epaxial muscles in chondrodystrophic and non-chondrodystrophic dogs with and without suspected intervertebral disc herniation- a preliminary study. Res Vet Sci. (2019) 123:204–15. 10.1016/j.rvsc.2019.01.008
66.
BarandunMABultSDemierreSVidondoBForterreF. Colder ambient temperatures influence acute onset canine intervertebral disc extrusion. Front Vet Sci. (2020) 7:175. 10.3389/fvets.2020.00175
67.
BrentAEBraunTTabinCJ. Genetic analysis of interactions between the somitic muscle, cartilage and tendon cell lineages during mouse development. Development. (2005) 132:515–28. 10.1242/dev.01605
68.
KahaneNCinnamonYBacheletIKalcheimC. The third wave of myotome colonization by mitotically competent progenitors: regulating the balance between differentiation and proliferation during muscle development. Development. (2001) 128:2187–98.
69.
CadieuENeffMWQuignonPWalshKChaseKParkerHGet al. Coat variation in the domestic dog is governed by variants in three genes. Science. (2009) 326:150–3. 10.1126/science.1177808
70.
HousleyDJVentaPJ. The long and the short of it: evidence that FGF5 is a major determinant of canine 'hair'-itability. Anim Genet. (2006) 37:309–15. 10.1111/j.1365-2052.2006.01448.x
71.
ClaseKLMitchellPJWardPJDormanCMJohnsonSEHannonK. FGF5 stimulates expansion of connective tissue fibroblasts and inhibits skeletal muscle development in the limb. Dev Dyn. (2000) 219:368–80. 10.1002/1097-0177(2000)9999:9999<::AID-DVDY1056>3.0.CO;2-8
72.
KazanskayaOGlinkaAdel Barco BarrantesIStannekPNiehrsCWuW. R-Spondin2 is a secreted activator of Wnt/beta-catenin signaling and is required for Xenopus myogenesis. Dev Cell. (2004) 7:525–34. 10.1016/j.devcel.2004.07.019
73.
KondoNYuasaTShimonoKTungWOkabeTYasuharaRet al. Intervertebral disc development is regulated by Wnt/beta-catenin signaling. Spine. (2011) 36:E513–8. 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181f52cb5
74.
SmoldersLAMeijBPOnisDRiemersFMBergknutNWubboltsRet al. Gene expression profiling of early intervertebral disc degeneration reveals a down-regulation of canonical Wnt signaling and caveolin-1 expression: implications for development of regenerative strategies. Arthritis Res Ther. (2013) 15:R23. 10.1186/ar4157
75.
MansourTALucotKKonopelskiSEDickinsonPJSturgesBKVernauKLet al. Whole genome variant association across 100 dogs identifies a frame shift mutation in DISHEVELLED 2 which contributes to Robinow-like syndrome in Bulldogs and related screw tail dog breeds. PLoS Genet. (2018) 14:e1007850. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007850
76.
KatohMKatohM. Cross-talk of WNT and FGF signaling pathways at GSK3beta to regulate beta-catenin and SNAIL signaling cascades. Cancer Biol Ther. (2006) 5:1059–64. 10.4161/cbt.5.9.3151
77.
CherroneKLDeweyCWCoatesJRBergmanRL. A retrospective comparison of cervical intervertebral disk disease in nonchondrodystrophic large dogs versus small dogs. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc. (2004) 40:316–20. 10.5326/0400316
78.
CudiaSPDuvalJM. Thoracolumbar intervertebral disk disease in large, nonchondrodystrophic dogs: a retrospective study. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc. (1997) 33:456–60. 10.5326/15473317-33-5-456
79.
HansenTSmoldersLATryfonidouMAMeijBPVernooijJCMBergknutNet al. The myth of fibroid degeneration in the canine intervertebral disc: a histopathological comparison of intervertebral disc degeneration in chondrodystrophic and nonchondrodystrophic dogs. Vet Pathol. (2017) 54:945–952. 10.1177/0300985817726834
80.
ThompsonKMooreSTangSWietMPurmessurD. The chondrodystrophic dog: A clinically relevant intermediate-sized animal model for the study of intervertebral disc-associated spinal pain. JOR Spine. (2018) 1:e1011. 10.1002/jsp2.1011
81.
BattieMCVidemanTGibbonsLEFisherLDManninenHGillK. 1995 Volvo Award in clinical sciences. Determinants of lumbar disc degeneration. A study relating lifetime exposures and magnetic resonance imaging findings in identical twins. Spine. (1995) 20:2601–12. 10.1097/00007632-199512150-00001
82.
BattieMCVidemanTLevalahtiEGillKKaprioJ. Heritability of low back pain and the role of disc degeneration. Pain. (2007) 131:272–80. 10.1016/j.pain.2007.01.010
83.
SambrookPNMacGregorAJSpectorTD. Genetic influences on cervical and lumbar disc degeneration: a magnetic resonance imaging study in twins. Arthritis Rheum. (1999) 42:366–72.3.0.CO;2-6 “target=” 10.1002/1529-0131(199902)42:2<366::AID-ANR20>3.0.CO;2-6
84.
LivshitsGPophamMMalkinISambrookPNMacgregorAJSpectorTet al. Lumbar disc degeneration and genetic factors are the main risk factors for low back pain in women: the UK Twin Spine Study. Ann Rheum Dis. (2011) 70:1740–5. 10.1136/ard.2010.137836
85.
MunirSRadeMMaattaJHFreidinMBWilliamsFMK. Intervertebral disc biology: genetic basis of disc degeneration. Curr Mol Biol Rep. (2018) 4:143–50. 10.1007/s40610-018-0101-2
Summary
Keywords
chondrodystrophy, fibroblast growth factor 4, heritable, intervertebral disc degeneration, retrogene
Citation
Dickinson PJ and Bannasch DL (2020) Current Understanding of the Genetics of Intervertebral Disc Degeneration. Front. Vet. Sci. 7:431. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.00431
Received
15 May 2020
Accepted
15 June 2020
Published
24 July 2020
Volume
7 - 2020
Edited by
Andrea Tipold, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Germany
Reviewed by
Sarah A. Moore, The Ohio State University, United States; Natasha Olby, North Carolina State University, United States
Updates

Check for updates
Copyright
© 2020 Dickinson and Bannasch.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Peter J. Dickinson pjdickinson@ucdavis.edu
This article was submitted to Veterinary Neurology and Neurosurgery, a section of the journal Frontiers in Veterinary Science
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.