In the original article, there was a mistake in Table 2 as published. The EXTEM CFT baseline mean (95% confidence interval) for the HES group was slightly incorrect due to a data entry error. The corrected Table 2 appears below.
Table 2
| Parameter | Baseline | Shock | T60 | T180 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| INTEM CT (sec) | ||||
| FWB | 279.3 (137.5–421.2) | 204.8 (123.1–286.5) | 330.5 (17.2–643.8) | 269.0 (150.7–387.3) |
| CRYST | 171.3 (149.1–193.5) | 160.7 (129.2–192.1) | 162.2 (134.0–190.3) | 159.8 (142.8–176.9) |
| HES | 201.2 (129.1–273.2) | 145.8 (72.2–219.5) | 231.8 (130.4–333.3) | 199.0 (113.0–285.0) |
| GELO | 221.5 (146.0–297.0) | 161.0 (117.0–205.0) | 224.3 (108.6–340.1) | 193.5 (146.5–240.5) |
| INTEM CFT (sec) | ||||
| FWB | 224.2 (143.1–305.2) | 260.3 (180.6–340.0) | 303.8 (102.0–505.7) | 235.3 (178.9–291.8) |
| CRYST | 143.5 (119.1–167.9) | 227.8 (190.9–264.8) | 298.8 (269.5–328.1) | 234.5 (207.6–261.4) |
| HES | 202.8 (106.9–298.8) | 264.0 (168.0–360.0) | 431.5 (287.3–575.7) | 309.2 (221.0–397.3) |
| GELO | 178.2 (128.4–227.9) | 186.2 (114.2–258.1) | 305.5 (211.1–399.9) | 278.7 (178.1–379.2) |
| INTEMα(°) | ||||
| FWB | 54.2 (44.9–63.4) | 54.0 (46.3–61.7) | 52.7 (38.5–66.8) | 56.2 (49.8–62.6) |
| CRYST | 68.0 (65.4–70.6) | 62.7 (57.2–68.1) | 56.8 (53.7–60.0) | 60.7 (59.8–61.5) |
| HES | 60.5 (49.4–71.6) | 56.0 (46.5–65.5) | 50.7 (40.2–61.1) | 53.5 (46.4–60.6) |
| GELO | 61.2 (56.5–65.9) | 61.7 (53.8–69.6) | 53.0 (46.7–59.3) | 56.2 (49.8–62.6) |
| INTEM MCF (mm) | ||||
| FWB | 51.2 (46.9–55.4) | 47.7 (43.0–52.3) | 45.3 (38.3–52.3)+ | 48.2 (44.5–51.8)+ |
| CRYST | 54.2 (50.8–57.5) | 46.3 (43.0–49.7) | 42.2 (39.9–44.4) | 44.0 (41.4–46.6) |
| HES | 50.3 (45.3–55.4) | 44.5 (40.3–48.7) | 37.0 (31.6–42.4)& | 41.0 (36.2–45.8)& |
| GELO | 54.0 (48.3–59.7) | 51.2 (45.8–56.5) | 41.5 (36.0–47.0) | 42.8 (37.2–48.5) |
| INTEM LI60 (%) | ||||
| FWB | 99.0 (97.4–100.6) | 99.7 (98.8–100.5) | 99.7 (98.8–100.5) | 99.2 (97.9–100.4) |
| CRYST | 99.7 (98.8–100.5) | 98.7 (97.6–99.8) | 96.8 (94.7–99.0) | 97.2 (94.4–99.9) |
| HES | 99.2 (97.9–100.4) | 98.5 (96.4–100.6) | 87.8 (67.3–108.4) | 90.0 (74.1–105.9) |
| GELO | 99.5 (98.6–100.4) | 99.7 (99.1–100.2) | 98.3 (94.0–102.6) | 96.5 (87.5–105.5) |
| EXTEM CT (sec) | ||||
| FWB | 52.5 (40.8–64.2) | 75.2 (57.2–93.1) | 64.7 (45.3–84.1)+ | 62.0 (53.1–70.9) |
| CRYST | 54.8 (37.8–71.9) | 66.2 (59.4–72.9) | 72.8 (62.9–82.8)+ | 71.5 (58.7–84.3) |
| HES | 61.8 (40.6–83.0) | 69.0 (56.1–81.9) | 119.3 (57.4–181.3)&,*,# | 82.7 (50.6–114.8) |
| GELO | 47.8 (28.6–67.0) | 55.8 (36.1–75.6) | 76.2 (27.5–124.8)+ | 75.2 (50.6–99.8) |
| EXTEM CFT (sec) | ||||
| FWB | 178.2 (121.5–234.8) | 217.3 (149.5–285.2) | 251.0 (127.6–374.4) | 202.2 (148.5–255.9) |
| CRYST | 129.3 (115.4–143.3) | 184.2 (152.6–215.7) | 246.0 (198.3–293.7) | 221.0 (177.7–264.3) |
| HES | 187.2 (106.0–268.3) | 208.0 (137.8–278.2) | 373.4 (179.9–566.9) | 437.3 (0.0–918.6) |
| GELO | 139.3 (102.6–176.1) | 165.0 (115.5–214.5) | 230.4 (167.7–293.1) | 263.3 (174.5–352.1) |
| EXTEMα(°) | ||||
| FWB | 59.8 (53.5–66.1) | 60.0 (55.9–64.1) | 55.8 (48.8–62.9) | 58.3 (54.4–62.3) |
| CRYST | 66.5 (64.4–68.6) | 63.3 (60.9–65.8) | 59.3 (54.2–64.5) | 60.8 (59.0–62.6) |
| HES | 61.7 (55.1–68.2) | 61.8 (56.4–67.2) | 46.2 (28.6–63.8) | 53.0 (39.8–66.2) |
| GELO | 65.7 (62.8–68.5) | 63.5 (59.9–67.1) | 49.5 (32.7–66.3) | 56.0 (52.5–59.5) |
| EXTEM MCF (mm) | ||||
| FWB | 50.5 (46.3–54.7) | 44.7 (39.6–49.7) | 45.3 (38.6–52.1)+ | 47.0 (43.4–50.6) |
| CRYST | 54.7 (52.1–57.2) | 45.7 (42.1–49.3) | 39.0 (33.3–44.7) | 39.3 (34.7–44.0) |
| HES | 49.3 (42.7–55.9) | 42.5 (33.4–51.6) | 31.2 (20.5–41.9)& | 37.8 (28.6–47.1) |
| GELO | 54.3 (47.8–60.8) | 50.0 (43.4–56.6)ß | 39.0 (26.6–51.4) | 40.3 (31.9–48.8) |
| EXTEM TPI | ||||
| FWB | 18.8 (12.7–25.0) | 12.5 (6.7–18.3) | 12.3 (5.6–19.0) | 14.0 (9.6–18.4) |
| CRYST | 28.5 (22.8–34.2) | 14.3 (10.5–18.2) | 8.2 (5.6–10.8) | 9.3 (6.1–12.6) |
| HES | 20.2 (7.4–32.9) | 14.2 (1.1–27.3) | 4.8 (2.0–7.6) | 8.2 (1.4–14.9) |
| GELO | 28.8 (15.3–42.4) | 21.0 (10.3–31.7) | 11.2 (5.3–17.1) | 9.5 (4.2–14.8) |
| EXTEM LI60 (%) | ||||
| FWB | 89.3 (66.9–111.7) | 78.7 (48.1–109.3) | 90.7 (70.7–110.7) | 91.0 (78.2–103.8) |
| CRYST | 99.0 (97.9–100.1) | 87.7 (73.0–102.3) | 84.7 (52.9–116.5) | 78.8 (58.5–99.2) |
| HES | 98.3 (95.5–101.2) | 83.3 (56.1–110.6) | 74.3 (36.5–112.2) | 84.3 (56.2–112.5) |
| GELO | 97.5 (93.8–101.2) | 86.7 (65.3–108.1) | 75.8 (49.2–102.5) | 72.5 (42.5–102.5) |
| FIBTEM MCF (mm) | ||||
| FWB | 4.3 (3.5–5.2) | 3.5 (2.4–4.6) | 3.3 (1.5–5.2) | 2.8 (1.0–4.6) |
| CRYST | 6.0 (3.1–8.9) | 4.7 (1.9–7.5) | 2.8 (1.0–4.6) | 3.2 (1.2–5.1) |
| HES | 5.0 (2.6–7.4) | 2.0 (0.0–4.9) | 0.7 (0.0–2.4) | 2.2 (0.0–5.2) |
| GELO | 4.8 (3.3–6.4) | 3.8 (2.3–5.4) | 2.0 (0.2–3.8) | 2.7 (1.1–4.2) |
Rotational thromboelastometry parameters (mean, 95% confidence interval) in dogs (n = 6 per group) with hemorrhagic shock given 20 mL kg−1 of either fresh whole blood (FWB), hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 (HES), 4% succinylated gelatin (GELO), or 80 mL kg−1 of balanced isotonic crystalloid (CRYST).
Fluid was delivered directly after Shock time point.
Significantly different to FWB;
Significantly different to CRYST;
Significantly different to HES;
Significantly different to GELO (Bonferroni–Holm corrected P-value < 0.05). α, alpha angle; CFT, clot formation time; CT, clotting time; LI60, lysis index at 60 min; MCF, maximum clot firmness; TPI, thrombodynamic potential index.
In the original article, there was a mistake in Table 5 as published. The EXTEM CFT baseline mean (95% confidence interval) was slightly incorrect due to a data entry error. The corrected Table 5 appears below.
Table 5
| Parameter | Baseline | Shock | P value* |
|---|---|---|---|
| Platelet Closure Time (sec) | 83.4 (77.6–89.1) | 69.0 (65.2–72.8) | <0.001 |
| Estimated Platelet Count (x109 L−1) | 134.3 (124.7–143.9) | 119.4 (106.3–132.5) | 0.057 |
| INTEM CT (sec) | 218.3 (180.9–255.7) | 168.1 (143.2–193.0) | <0.001 |
| INTEM CFT (sec) | 158.5 (135.9–181.1) | 234.6 (203.6–265.6) | <0.001 |
| INTEM α (°) | 61.0 (57.4–64.5) | 58.6 (55.3–61.9) | 0.067 |
| INTEM MCF (mm) | 52.4 (50.5–54.3) | 47.4 (45.4–49.4) | <0.001 |
| INTEM LI60 (%) | 99.3 (98.9–99.8) | 99.1 (98.6–99.7) | 0.458 |
| EXTEM CT (sec) | 54.3 (47.3–61.2) | 66.5 (60.1–73.0) | <0.001 |
| EXTEM CFT (sec) | 148.0 (125.3–170.7) | 193.6 (170.5–216.8) | <0.001 |
| EXTEM α (°) | 63.4 (61.2–65.6) | 62.2 (60.5–63.8) | 0.117 |
| EXTEM MCF (mm) | 52.2 (50.0–54.4) | 45.7 (43.0–48.4) | <0.001 |
| EXTEM LI60 (%) | 96.0 (91.4–100.7) | 84.1 (74.9–93.3) | 0.002 |
| EXTEM TPI | 24.1 (19.8–28.4) | 15.5 (11.8–19.2) | <0.001 |
| FIBTEM MCF (mm) | 5.0 (4.2–5.9) | 3.5 (2.6–4.4) | <0.001 |
| Prothrombin Time (sec) | 7.5 (7.3–7.7) | 8.5 (8.2–8.8) | <0.001 |
| Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time (sec) | 15.4 (14.8–16.0) | 14.4 (13.6–15.1) | <0.001 |
| Fibrinogen Concentration (g L−1) | 1.41 (1.29–1.54) | 0.97 (0.87–1.08) | <0.001 |
| Factor VII Activity (%) | 99.1 (92.5–105.7) | 77.8 (71.7–84.0) | <0.001 |
| Factor VIII Activity (%) | 109.8 (98.0–121.6) | 155.4 (139.9–171.0) | <0.001 |
| von Willebrand Factor Antigen (%) | 100.6 (90.0–111.3) | 74.3 (60.2–88.4) | <0.001 |
Platelet closure time and count, rotational thromboelastometry, and plasma coagulation assay parameters (mean, 95% confidence interval) in dogs (n = 24) with hemorrhagic shock.
Paired t-test, bold indicates P < 0.05. α, alpha angle; CFT, clot formation time; CT, clotting time; LI60, lysis index at 60 min; MCF, maximum clot firmness; TPI, thrombodynamic potential index.
In the original article, there was an error. A conversion factor was inadvertently omitted from the equation for thrombodynamic potential index (TPI).
A correction has been made to Materials and Methods, Coagulation Parameters, Paragraph 3:
Rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM®delta, Tem International GmbH) was performed according to the manufacturer's instructions and PROVETS guidelines (28) using the INTEM (star-TEM and in-TEM reagents), EXTEM (star-TEM and r ex-TEM reagents), FIBTEM (r ex-TEM and fib-TEM reagents), and APTEM (r ex-TEM and ap-TEM reagents) profiles. Measurement was started 30 min after sample collection. Each profile was run for at least 1 h following initiation. Data recorded for the INTEM and EXTEM profiles included clotting time (CT), clot formation time (CFT), alpha angle (α), maximum clot firmness (MCF), and lysis index at 60 min (LI60). Thrombodynamic potential index (TPI) was recorded for the EXTEM profile as a measure of global coagulation (29), calculated using the equations:
The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
Summary
Keywords
hydroxyethyl starch, succinylated gelatin, crystalloid, fresh whole blood, platelet closure time, PFA-100, rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM), viscoelastic coagulation tests
Citation
Boyd CJ, Claus MA, Raisis AL, Hosgood G, Sharp CR and Smart L (2020) Corrigendum: Hypocoagulability and Platelet Dysfunction Are Exacerbated by Synthetic Colloids in a Canine Hemorrhagic Shock Model. Front. Vet. Sci. 7:641. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.00641
Received
29 June 2020
Accepted
06 August 2020
Published
08 September 2020
Volume
7 - 2020
Edited and reviewed by
Katja-Nicole Adamik, University of Bern, Switzerland
Updates
Copyright
© 2020 Boyd, Claus, Raisis, Hosgood, Sharp and Smart.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Corrin J. Boyd c.boyd@murdoch.edu.au
This article was submitted to Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, a section of the journal Frontiers in Veterinary Science
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.