In the published article, there was an error in Table 2 as published. An incorrect letter was used in the first column of the table. In the fourth row of the first column, “A-product” was incorrectly indicated. The correct product is “B-product.” The corrected Table 2 and its caption appear below.
Table 2
| Products | Animal species | Species | PEN | AMX | AMC | GEN | OTC | DOX | CLI | PSA | GAT | FLO | TIL | VAN |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breakpoint* | MIC (μg/mL) | |||||||||||||
| ≥16 | ≥8 | ≥8 | ≥32 | ≥8 | ≥0.5 | ≥32 | ≥16 | ≥2 | ≥8 | ≥128 | ≥4 | |||
| B-product | Dogs, cats | Enterococcus faecium | 4 | 1 | 1 | >32 | 0.25 | < 0.125 | 4 | >128 | 0.5 | 8 | 2 | 1 |
| C-product | Dogs, cats | 8 | 1 | 1 | >32 | 0.25 | < 0.125 | 4 | >128 | 0.5 | 8 | 2 | 1 | |
| D-product | Cats | 4 | 1 | 2 | 32 | 0.25 | < 0.125 | 4 | >128 | 1 | 8 | 1 | 1 | |
| E-product | Dogs | 8 | 1 | 2 | 32 | 0.25 | < 0.125 | 4 | >128 | 0.5 | 8 | 1 | 2 | |
| F-product | Dogs, cats | 4 | 1 | 1 | >32 | 0.25 | < 0.125 | 4 | >128 | 0.5 | 8 | 2 | 2 | |
| G-product | Dogs, cats | 8 | 1 | 1 | >32 | 0.25 | < 0.125 | 4 | >128 | 0.5 | 8 | 2 | 1 | |
| H-product | Dogs | 8 | 1 | 1 | >32 | 0.25 | < 0.125 | 8 | >128 | 2 | 8 | 1 | 1 | |
| I-product | Dogs, cats | 8 | 1 | 1 | >32 | 0.25 | < 0.125 | 4 | >128 | 2 | 8 | 2 | 2 | |
| J-product | Dogs | 8 | 1 | 1 | 32 | 0.25 | <0.125 | 8 | >128 | 2 | 8 | 1 | 1 | |
Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values of Enterococcus faecium strains isolated from the products for tested antibiotics.
PEN, penicillin; AMX, amoxicillin; AMC, amoxicillin-clavulanic acid; GEN, gentamicin; OTC, oxytetracycline; DOX, doxycycline; CLI, clindamycin; PSA, potentiated sulphonamide; GAT, gatifloxacin; FLO, florfenicol; TIL, tylosin; VAN, vancomycin.
CLSI and EUCAST.
sensitive resistant.
The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
Statements
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Summary
Keywords
probiotics, ARG, NGS, companion animals, antimicrobial resistance
Citation
Kerek A, Szabó E, Szabó Á, Papp M, Bányai K, Kardos G, Kaszab E, Bali K and Jerzsele Á (2024) Corrigendum: Investigating antimicrobial resistance genes in probiotic products for companion animals. Front. Vet. Sci. 11:1531511. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1531511
Received
20 November 2024
Accepted
29 November 2024
Published
17 December 2024
Volume
11 - 2024
Edited and reviewed by
Iram Liaqat, Government College University, Lahore, Pakistan
Updates
Copyright
© 2024 Kerek, Szabó, Szabó, Papp, Bányai, Kardos, Kaszab, Bali and Jerzsele.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Adam Kerek kerek.adam@univet.hu
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.