SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article
Front. Vet. Sci.
Sec. Veterinary Epidemiology and Economics
Systematic review and meta-analysis for the occurrence of Crimean-Congo Hemorrhagic Fever, Tularemia and Rift Valley Fever in pastoralist systems in Africa
Provisionally accepted- 1International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), Nairobi, Kenya
- 2University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya
- 3University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
- 4University of Embu, Embu, Kenya
- 5Zoonotic Disease Unit, Nairobi, Kenya
- 6University of Florida, Florida, United States
- 7Smithsonian Institution, Washington, United States
- 8Natural History Museum, London, United Kingdom
- 9Parapet Science and Policy Consulting, Washington, United States
- 10Kenya Medical Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya
- 11Turkana basin Institute, New York, United States
- 12Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Pastoralism is a livestock production system practiced in areas with harsh environmental conditions. It is characterized by low investment in animal health, with increased risk of outbreaks of animal diseases. Zoonoses such as Crimean Congo haemorrhagic fever (CCHF), Rift Valley fever (RVF) and tularaemia, may be spread through livestock product value chains. Published papers on the three diseases were searched from PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus and Google scholar databases using predetermined search terms. After their eligibility for inclusion was examined, full texts of the included articles were downloaded and data extracted. Data included variables on publication details, laboratory methods and measures of disease occurrence with the studies also being grouped according to livestock value chain nodes. Random effects models were fitted to pool the study prevalences. Egger's test and symmetry of funnel plots were used to investigate publication bias. A random forests algorithm was used to determine relevant moderators of prevalence and a mixed effects model to examine relevance of selected moderators. RVF was the most studied pathogen (22/34; 64.7%) followed by CCHF (10/34; 29.4%) with 2/34(5.9%) papers describing the occurrence of tularaemia in pastoral settings in Africa. Pooled prevalence for RVF was highest in humans 29% (95% CI: 7% -69%), then camels 19% (95% CI: 7% -43%) and lowest in goats at 6% (95% CI: 4% -10%). CCHF prevalence was highest in camels at 48% (95% CI: 8% -91%) and lowest in humans at 6% (95% CI: 2% -19%). Prevalence was highest in livestock farms for RVF (13% (95% CI: 10% -16%) and CCHF 15% (95% CI: 4% -44%). Females were more likely to be positive 5.20 (95% CI: 3.09 -8.76 p<0.01) while mixed herds were more likely to be positive for RVF (33.34 (95% CI: 0.72 -1548.64, p= 0.0734). Two papers investigated tularaemia with pooled positivity being 2% (95% CI: 0% -8%). This review provides evidence that CCHF, RVF, and tularaemia pathogens are endemic in pastoral areas. Enhanced surveillance for these pathogens along livestock value chain nodes to mitigate risk of their spread is warranted.
Keywords: Zoonotic, Systematic Literature Review, pastoralism, Rift Valley Fever, Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever
Received: 07 May 2025; Accepted: 18 Nov 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Nyaguthii, Onono, Kimeli, Fevre, Nthiwa, Muturi, von Fricken, Redding, Carlin, Ofula, Martins, Fava and Hassel. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Dickson Nyaguthii
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
