Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Vet. Sci., 06 August 2025

Sec. Animal Nutrition and Metabolism

Volume 12 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2025.1654416

Effects of Fagopyrum dibotrys rhizoma meal supplementation on productive performance, egg quality, egg nutritional value, and serum biochemical parameters of Shanma laying ducks

Pingwen Xiong,,&#x;Pingwen Xiong1,2,3Gaoxiang Ai,&#x;Gaoxiang Ai2,3Jiang Chen,Jiang Chen2,3Wenjing Song,Wenjing Song2,3Weide Su,Weide Su2,3Dongyou YuDongyou Yu1Qiongli Song,Qiongli Song2,3Chuanhui Xu,Chuanhui Xu2,3Zhiheng Zou,Zhiheng Zou2,3Qipeng Wei,Qipeng Wei2,3Xiaolian Chen,
Xiaolian Chen2,3*Lizhen Hu,
Lizhen Hu2,3*
  • 1Key Laboratory of Molecular Animal Nutrition (Zhejiang University), Ministry of Education, Hangzhou, China
  • 2Institute of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Science, Jiangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanchang, China
  • 3Jiangxi Province Key Laboratory of Animal Green and Healthy Breeding, Nanchang, China

Introduction: The rhizoma of Fagopyrum dibotrys (D. Don) Hara, a traditional natural medicinal herb with extensive historical applications in China, possess anti-inflammatory, anticancer, antioxidant, antimicrobial, immunomodulatory, and antidiabetic effects. However, the potential positive effects of F. dibotrys rhizoma meal (FDRM) on productive performance in high-density laying duck farming remain unclear. This experiment was conducted to assess the impacts of FDRM supplementation in Shanma laying ducks diet by determining productive performance, egg quality, egg nutritional value, and serum biochemical parameters.

Methods: With similar laying performance (80.88 ± 5.17%) and body weight (1.24 ± 0.02 kg), 512 healthy 32-week-old Shanma laying ducks were randomly assigned to four groups consisting of eight replicates (16 ducks per replicate). Ducks in the control group (F0 group) were fed only the basal diet, while the other groups (F1, F2, and F3 groups) were fed the basal diets supplemented with 1, 2, and 3% FDRM, respectively. The experiment lasted for 49 days with ad libitum access to feed and water.

Results: The results showed that supplementing FDRM in duck diet had no adverse effects on laying performance (p > 0.05). Additionally, compared with the control group, dietary supplementation with FDRM significantly improved the shell strength, yolk color, and shell proportion (p < 0.05), while increasing the serum total protein (TP) content (p < 0.05). The study also found that adding 2% FDRM significantly enhanced the contents of total amino acids, essential amino acids, and umami amino acids in eggs (p < 0.05), improved the composition of monounsaturated fatty acids and polyunsaturated fatty acids (p < 0.05), and reduced the saturated fatty acids content. However, 3% FDRM addition increased the serum blood urea nitrogen content (p < 0.05), indicating reduced the dietary protein utilization efficiency.

Discussion: With the rapid development of the economy and the continuous improvement of people’s living standards, people have raised higher demands for the nutritional and high quality of eggs. Duck eggs, rich in protein, amino acids, fatty acids, minerals, and vitamins, serve as an important source of high-quality protein for human’s food and health. Moreover, the n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids in eggs have beneficial effects in preventing cardiovascular diseases. Currently, numerous studies have shown that F. dibotrys is abundant in active substances such as flavonoids and phenolics. Additionally, Traditional Chinese herbs rich in flavonoids and phenolics have been proven to enhance the nutritional value of eggs, improve the laying performance of poultry, and promote their overall health. This study indicated that dietary supplementation with 2% FDRM might improve egg quality and egg nutritional value of Shanma laying ducks through improving the shell strength, yolk color, and shell proportion, enhancing yolk fatty acids and amino acids profiles and elevating serum TP content.

1 Introduction

China is the world’s largest producer of laying ducks, maintaining a standing stock of approximately 150 million ducks annually, which accounts for over 80% of the global total (1). Amid the rapid development of the laying duck industry, key industry concerns now revolve around enhancing production performance, optimizing egg quality, improving the nutritional value of duck eggs, and achieving green and sustainable development. Additionally, duck eggs are rich in protein, amino acids, fatty acids, minerals, and vitamins, serving as an important source of high-quality protein for humans (2, 3). The fatty acids in eggs are also beneficial to human health, particularly the n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids in eggs, which have a beneficial effect on preventing cardiovascular diseases (4). With rapid economic development and continuous improvement in living standards, consumers are placing higher demands on the nutritional and health-promoting qualities of egg products, making it imperative to enhance the nutritional and functional value of duck eggs (3). Recent studies have revealed that Chinese herbal medicine or plant extracts are rich in bioactive compounds such as disease-resistant alkaloids, antioxidant flavonoids, and phenolics. These substances can effectively improve the nutritional value of eggs by enhancing antioxidant capacity, boosting immune function, and optimizing gut microbiota structure in poultry, demonstrating significant potential for practical applications (512).

Fagopyrum dibotrys (F. dibotrys) (D. Don) Hara, a perennial herbaceous plant belonging to the Polygonaceae family and Fagopyrum genus, possesses significant medicinal and edible value, and has been officially included in China’s Feed Materials Directory (13). The rhizomata, stems, leaves, flowers, and other parts of it contain trace mineral elements, including copper (Cu), iron (Fe), and zinc (Zn), etc., as well as 17 amino acids such as methionine (Met), arginine (Arg), and lysine (Lys), etc., along with various vitamins including vitamin B₁, vitamin B₂, and vitamin E, etc. (14), and these essential nutrients potentially enhancing egg production, improving egg quality, boosting immune function, and supporting overall health and productivity. The rhizoma of F. dibotrys (FDR) has a long history of application in traditional Chinese medicine. It contains various bioactive compounds including flavonoids, phenolics, triterpenoids, and tannins, etc. (1517), and exhibits multiple biological properties such as antioxidant, antibacterial, anti-inflammatory, and immunomodulatory effects (1820). Currently, its stems and leaves are widely used in pharmaceuticals, health foods, beverages, and forage, while research on its rhizomata in livestock production remains limited. As a forage crop, F. dibotrys exhibits strong adaptability, high propagation efficiency, and substantial biomass yield (up to 112,500 kg hm−2). Its stems and leaves are rich in crude protein (12.28% DM) with low crude fiber (24.06% DM), neutral detergent fiber (39.74% DM), and acid detergent fiber (30.18% DM), making it a potential unconventional feed ingredient to replace part of swine diets and alleviate feed shortages (14, 2123). Studies showed that supplementing 10% fresh F. dibotrys in laying hens diets deepened yolk color and improved amino acids composition in Changshun green-shell eggs (23). Furthermore, adding 400–800 mg/kg of F. dibotrys stem-leaf extract not only enhanced egg production, quality, and nutritional value but also improved immunity by modulating serum biochemical parameters (24). Additionally, dietary inclusion of 1–2% F. dibotrys rhizoma meal (FDRM) in broilers alleviated oxidative stress induced by oxidized oil, thereby improving poultry health (19).

Nevertheless, based on our knowledge, researches on F. dibotrys has primarily focused on its stems and leaves, with studies conducted on growing-finishing pigs (12), sows (22), mice (20), and laying hens (23, 24), demonstrating certain improvements in animal growth performance and farming efficiency. However, studies on the application of its rhizomata in poultry are very scarce. It is currently unclear whether dietary supplementation with FDRM can exert similarly positive effects on intensive laying ducks production as its stem and leaf derivatives. Consequently, this study aims to investigate the effects of FDRM on productive performance, egg quality, nutritional value of eggs, and serum biochemical parameters, thereby providing a scientific basis for utilizing FDRM as an unconventional feed resource in Shanma laying ducks production.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Experimental materials

The F. dibotrys rhizoma meal (FDRM) used in this study was provided by the Institute of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine, Jiangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences. Fresh F. dibotrys rhizomata were collected, crushed and passed through the 80-mesh screen to prepare FDRM. The main bioactive compounds of FDRM are total flavonoids and polyphenols, quantified using a UV spectrophotometer (UV-1800, Shimadzu Corp., Kyoto, Japan) at the Jiangxi Province Key Laboratory of Animal Green and Healthy Breeding, which the contents are 19.6 mg/g and 63.85 mg/g, respectively. Moreover, the nutritional compositions of FDRM in this experiment are shown in Table 1. The contents of conventional nutrients in F. dibotrys rhizoma meal were determined according to the methods specified in the National Standards of the People’s Republic of China, including gross energy (GE, GB/T 45104-2024), dry matter (DM, GB/T 6435-2014), crude protein (CP, GB/T 6432-2018), crude fat (EE, GB/T 6433-2006), crude fiber (CF, GB/T 6434-2006), crude ash (Ash, GB/T 6438-2007), calcium (Ca, GB/T 6436-2018), and total phosphorus (TP, GB/T 6437-2018).

Table 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Nutritional compositions of FDRM (air-dry basis) %.

2.2 Ducks, experimental design, and treatments

This study was conducted on 32-weeks-old Longyan Shanma laying ducks for a 49-day period with a completely randomized design. A total of 512 laying ducks with similar productive performance (80.88 ± 5.17%) and body weight (1.24 ± 0.02 kg) were used in this experiment. Ducks were randomly allocated to four groups with eight replicates per group and 16 ducks per replicate (128 laying ducks per group). The control group (F0) received the basal diet, while the treatment groups were provided with diets containing 1% (F1), 2% (F2), and 3% (F3) FDRM supplementation. All diets were nutritionally balanced and formulated to meet identical nutritional specifications.

2.3 Diets and management

This trial was carried out at the test field of laying ducks in Gaoan, Institute of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Science, Jiangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences, PR China. The basal diet fed animals was maize-soybean meal diet, which was formulated based on the China’s national standard “nutrient requirements for egg duck” (GB/T 41189-2021) to meet the nutrient requirements of Longyan Shanma ducks. Table 2 presents the composition and nutrient levels of experimental diets. The experimental laying ducks were raised in three-layer three-dimensional netting, consisted of four adjacent cages (40 × 38 × 38 cm, length × width × height) with two animals per cage, providing 28,880 cm3 per animal in closed fully automated duck house. Each replicate was raised on the upper and middle floors and each group was guaranteed to be equal in the number of distributed upper and middle layers. During the period of study, the housing temperature and relative humidity were 23.0 ± 2.0°C and 55–75%, respectively. Furthermore, the photoperiod was set at 16L:8D with a light intensity of 20 lux through a 49-day experimental period. Animals were kept with ad libitum access to feed and water during the entire experimental period.

Table 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Composition and nutrient levels of experimental diets (air-dry basis) %.

2.4 Productive performance

Throughout the trial, the ducks’ egg production and egg weight were monitored daily, and feed consumption was meticulously recorded on a replicate basis at weekly intervals using an electronic balance (HLD-5003, Youheng Weighing Equipment Co., Ltd., Hangzhou, China). At the end of the feeding trial, these values processed using Excel 2016 (Microsoft Corp., United States) were used to analyze the daily egg weight (DEW), average egg weight (AEW), laying rate (LR), average daily feed intake (ADFI), and the ratio of feed to egg (F/E) of the ducks for the 49-day feeding period.

2.5 Egg quality

On the final day of the experiment, a random subset of eight freshly laid eggs (a total of 64 eggs from each treatment) were collected for each replicate, which were used for conventional egg quality analysis (within 48 h after laying), including shape index, shell strength, shell thickness, Haugh unit, yolk color, vitellus proportion, albumen proportion, and shell proportion. The shape index was measured with a precision caliper marked at 0.01 mm intervals and was represented by the formula shape index (SI) = (egg length/egg width) (3). Shell strength was assessed along the vertical axis with a compression tester (EFG-0503, Robotmation, Tokyo, Japan). The shell thickness was determined (excluding shell membrane) using a micrometer with the least count of 0.01 mm and was expressed by the mean of measurements taken at three points (air cell, equator, and sharp end) of the egg. Haugh unit, yolk color, and albumen height were measured using an Egg Multi-tester (EMT-5200, Robotmation, Tokyo, Japan). The vitellus, albumen, and shell were separated, weighed, and expressed as a percentage of total egg weight.

2.6 Egg nutritional value

After measuring the egg physical parameters, the vitelluses were sampled, lyophilized, and subsequently analyzed for nutrient composition, amino acids composition and fatty acids profile. Nutrient composition included moisture, crude protein (CP), crude fat, cholesterol, and Ca were determined in accordance with AOAC methods (25). Crude protein content was estimated by measuring nitrogen content (Kjeldahl method) with an automatic Kjeldahl nitrogen analyzer (SKD-200, Shanghai Peiou Analysis Instruments Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) and applying a 6.25 conversion factor. Ether extract was measured using the Soxhlet method with petroleum ether extraction in a Hanon Automatic Soxhlet Extractor (SZF-06A, Shanghai Lichen Instruments Technology Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China). The method for the Ca and cholesterol determination were used by an UV spectrophotometer (UV-1800, Shimadzu Corp., Kyoto, Japan) and commercial kits (Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute, Nanjing, China) as described by Zhang et al. (26).

According to the methods reported by Cullere et al. (27) and Xu et al. (28), the amino acids content of the eggs were analyzed. The determination of amino acids content in egg yolk was determined by ion-exchange chromatography with the following procedure: approximately 0.1 g of egg yolk powder sample was weighed and digested with 5 mL of 6 mol/L HCl solution at 105°C in an oven for 24 h. After digestion, the solution was diluted to 50 mL in a volumetric flask with deionized water and filtered through a 0.22 μm aqueous-phase filter into a centrifuge tube. Then, 2 mL of the filtrate was evaporated in an evaporating dish in a 60°C water bath, followed by the addition of 4 mL of 0.02 mol/L HCl solution for dissolution. Once fully dissolved, the sample was stored at 4°C for analysis using an ion-exchange amino acid analyzer (L8900, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan). A total of 17 amino acids were determined, as detailed in Table 3.

Table 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3. Effect of FDRM on amino acids composition in the vitellus of laying ducks1 (mg/g, as-fresh basis).

The freeze-dried egg yolk samples were pulverized and passed through a 40-mesh sieve for fatty acids analysis. The preparation of fatty acids methyl esters from total lipids followed the procedure described by Hao et al. (29) and GB 5009.168-2016. Both quantitative and qualitative analyses were performed using an Agilent 7890B gas chromatography system (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, California, United States) coupled with an Agilent 5977B mass spectrometer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, California, United States). First, the total lipids of egg yolk samples were extracted using a mixture of chloroform and methanol (2,1, v/v). The lipids were then methylated in a potassium hydroxide-methanol solution (0.4 mol/L) for 30 min, followed by the addition of 2 mL of deionized water. The mixture was vortexed and centrifuged for 5 min (1,006 × g), and the upper layer was collected and stored at −20°C for further use. The fatty acids in the samples were identified by combining retention times and mass spectral characteristics. Each fatty acid was identified by comparison with known standards (Anpel Laboratory Technologies Inc., Shanghai, China), and the fatty acids content were calculated using the area normalization method, expressed as a percentage of the total fatty acids. A total of 15 fatty acids were determined, as detailed in Table 4.

Table 4
www.frontiersin.org

Table 4. Effect of FDRM on fatty acids profile in the vitellus of laying ducks1 (%).

2.7 Serum biochemical parameters

At the end of the 8 weeks, two laying ducks with close to the average weight were randomly selected from each replicate, after fasting, 5 mL of blood samples was collected from the wing vein using a black 7-gauge needle and vacuum coagulation tubes. The blood samples were centrifuged at 1,006 × g for 10 min to separate serum within 2 h after blood collection using a centrifuge (LC-LX-L50C, Shanghai LiChen Instrument Technology, Ltd., Shanghai, China) at the Jiangxi Province Key Laboratory of Animal Green and Healthy Breeding, and the serum was separated and stored at −20°C for further use. The serum levels of triglycerides (TG, Cat no, A110-2-1), total cholesterol (TC, Cat no, A111-2-1), high-density lipoprotein (HDL, Cat no, A112-2-1), and low-density lipoprotein (LDL, Cat no, A113-2-1), total protein (TP, Cat no, A045-2-2), albumin (ALB, Cat no, A028-2-1), blood urea nitrogen (BUN, Cat no, C013-2-1), alkaline phosphatase (AKP, Cat no, A059-2-2), and calcium (Ca, Cat no, C004-2-1) were measured by an Automatic Biochemistry Instrument (BS-420, Shenzhen Myriad Bio-Medical Electronics Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, China) using commercial assay kits. All assay kits were provided by the Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute.

2.8 Statistical analyses

All data were organized using Excel 2013, subjected to tests for normality and homogeneity of variance, and subsequently analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (one-way ANOVA) with the Bonferroni method in SPSS 22.0 statistical software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, United States) to test for multiple comparisons. The experimental results were presented as mean and pooled SEM. A value of p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant, while a value of 0.05 < p < 0.10 indicated a trend toward an increase or decrease.

3 Results

3.1 Productive performance

The effects of dietary FDRM supplementation on productive performance of laying ducks are shown in Table 5. During the entire period, there were no significant effects (p > 0.05) by adding FDRM in laying ducks diet, regardless of the supplementation levels, on DEW, AEW, DEN, LR, ADFI, and F/E.

Table 5
www.frontiersin.org

Table 5. Effects of FDRM on productive performance of laying duck1 (33–39 weeks of age).

3.2 Egg quality

The egg quality parameters of laying ducks are depicted in Table 6. Compared with the F0 group, the shell strength and yolk color in F2 and F3 groups were significantly increased (p < 0.05). Furthermore, the yolk color in F1 group and the shell proportion in F3 group were significantly (p < 0.05) higher than that in F0 group. No significant differences were observed in shape index, shell thickness, albumen height, Haugh unit, vitellus proportion, and albumen proportion (p > 0.05), in response to dietary FDRM supplementation levels.

Table 6
www.frontiersin.org

Table 6. Effects of FDRM on egg quality of laying ducks1 (39 weeks of age).

3.3 Egg nutritional value

3.3.1 Nutrient composition of egg

For the conventional nutrient levels of the vitellus in laying ducks, no significant dietary effects were observed across the measured parameters (moisture; crude protein; ether extract; cholesterol and Ca) (Table 7). Nevertheless, compared with the F0 group, the Ca content in F2 and F3 groups tend to improve as the inclusion level of FDRM increased (p = 0.073).

Table 7
www.frontiersin.org

Table 7. Effects of FDRM on conventional nutrient levels in the vitellus of laying ducks (fresh matter basis)1.

3.3.2 Amino acids composition

As can be seen from Table 3, the contents of Thr, Val, Ile, Leu, Asp., Glu, Gly, Cys, total EAAs, total AAs, and umami AAs in the vitellus showed significant response to the increasing FDRM supplement levels (p < 0.05). Compared with the control group (F0), there was no difference in the amino acids profile in F1 group (p > 0.05), dietary supplementation with 2% FDRM (F2) group could markedly increase the contents of Thr, Leu, Asp., Glu, Gly, Cys, total EAAs, total AAs, and umami AAs (p < 0.05), while the Thr and Asp concentrations in the group supplemented with 3% FDRM (F3) were statistically heighted (p < 0.05), with no dietary effect on other amino acids contents (p > 0.05). Furthermore, compared with the F1 group, the F2 group significantly increased the contents of Val, Ile, Leu, Gly, Cys, and total EAAs (p < 0.05), without significantly affecting the contents of other amino acids (p > 0.05).

3.3.3 Fatty acids profile

Table 4 showed the effect of dietary FDRM addition on the fatty acids profile in the vitellus of laying ducks. The levels of C16:0 and total SFAs in the F1 and F2 groups exhibited a significant decrease compared to the F0 group (p < 0.05), while the UFAs:SFAs ratio increased significantly (p < 0.05). Moreover, the levels of C14:0 significantly decreased in the F2 and F3 groups (p < 0.05), the F3 group statistically heighted the contents of C20:1 and C20:3, markedly reduced the contents of total SFAs (p < 0.05). Compared with the F0 group, the PUFAs:SFAs ratio in the vitellus from the F1 group displayed a remarkable enhancement (p < 0.05).

3.4 Serum biochemical parameters

For serum biochemical parameters, the levels of TP and BUN along with the concentration of Ca in serum of laying ducks showed significant responses with increasing levels of FDRM in the diets (Table 8, p < 0.05). The serum levels of TP in F2 group and BUN in F3 group were significantly (p < 0.01) higher than that in F0 group. Additionally, in comparison to the F2 group, the F1 and F3 group dramatically lowered the Ca concentration in serum of laying ducks.

Table 8
www.frontiersin.org

Table 8. Effects of FDRM on serum biochemical parameters of laying ducks1.

4 Discussion

This experiment aimed to investigate the effects of dietary supplementation with FDRM on laying performance, egg quality, egg nutritional value, and serum biochemical indicators of Shanma laying ducks. Our findings demonstrated that dietary inclusion of FDRM had no significant impact on daily egg weight, average egg weight, daily egg number, laying rate, average daily feed intake, and the ratio of feed to egg in laying ducks, but markedly enhanced shell strength and yolk coloration. Currently, there is limited research on the application of F. dibotrys in laying ducks. However, studies in laying hens (23) and broilers (30) are consistent with the results of this experiment, showing that F. dibotrys and its extracts have no significant impact on production performance. This also aligns with the findings of our previous research on reproductive performance (22). In general, compared to Fagopyrum esculentum (common buckwheat) and Fagopyrum tataricum (tartary buckwheat), F. dibotrys (golden buckwheat), as a member of the Fagopyrum genus, contains a greater variety of flavonoids and phenolics, exhibits stronger antimicrobial activity, and demonstrates intermediate antioxidant capacity (17, 31). Additionally, Chinese herbal medicine rich in flavonoids and phenolic acids have been shown to improve poultry health status and egg production performance (32, 33). Zhang et al. (26) found that supplementation of Mulberry leaf extract (rich in flavonoids such as rutin and phenolic acids like chlorogenic acid) in Lohmann Silber layers diet showed no adverse effects on production performance, yet significantly improved yolk pigmentation. In contrast, Chen et al. (3) and Feng et al. (34) reported that dietary supplementation with honeycomb extracts (rich in flavonoids such as quercetin and phenolic acids like caffeic acid) and Eucommia ulmoides leaf powder (rich in phenolic acids such as chlorogenic acid) in laying ducks have no significant improvements in laying performance and egg quality. Similarly, in the study by Iskender et al. (35), it was observed that no significant differences in laying performance and eggshell quality, in response to dietary supplementation with hesperidin, naringin and quercetin (All belong to the flavonoids). These discrepancies might be attributed to variations in Chinese herbal medicine types, poultry breeds and diets. Moreover, the intensified yolk pigmentation is likely attributable to the abundant bioactive constituents in F. dibotrys, notably flavonoids and phenolic acids, whose potent antioxidant activity helps preserve and deposit pigments by inhibiting the oxidation of carotenoids within the yolk (36). Given the limited existing research on FDRM in laying duck nutrition, further mechanistic investigations are warranted to elucidate its functional properties.

Duck eggs, containing abundant protein and amino acids, fatty acids, minerals and vitamins, serve as an excellent source of essential nutrients for human food and health. The primary indicators for assessing their nutritional value and sensory quality typically encompass amino acids composition and fatty acids profiles (3, 24). As fundamental building blocks of life, essential amino acids such as lysine, methionine, threonine, and phenylalanine not only play critical roles in regulating lipid and protein metabolism but also constitute indispensable nutrients that cannot be endogenously synthesized by animals and must be supplemented through dietary intake (37). This study revealed that compared to the control group, the 2% FDRM-supplemented group significantly increased the contents of total amino acids (by 9.27%), total essential amino acids (by 9.34%), and umami amino acids (by 7.62%) in egg yolks, confirming the beneficial effect of FDRM on the nutritional value of duck eggs. Currently, there is limited research on the application of F. dibotrys in laying ducks. Modern pharmacological studies have shown that golden buckwheat is rich in a variety of flavonoids and phenolic compounds, such as quercetin, rutin, gallic acid, and proanthocyanidins, which endow it with significant antioxidant properties (21, 31). The potential underlying mechanisms may involve enhancing antioxidant capacity and modulating the expressions of genes related to amino acid metabolism (38). Notably, Yao et al. (39) also reported that sea buckthorn extract rich in flavonoid such as quercetin significantly improved the contents of total amino acids, essential amino acids, and umami amino acids in eggs through a similar mechanism. Nevertheless, current research remains insufficient in identifying the specific bioactive components within FDRM and their molecular targets, which represents a critical focus for future investigations.

Accumulating evidence highlights the dual implications of fatty acids intake on human health. Scientific evidence indicated that high intake of saturated fatty acids is associated with elevated risks of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disorders, while monounsaturated and polyunsaturated fatty acids demonstrate various protective health effects, including anti-inflammatory effects, regulation of glucose and lipid metabolism, and promotion of muscle growth (28, 40). In the present trial, adding FDRM in laying duck diet led to an increase in the ratio of unsaturated to saturated fatty acids (UFAs:SFAs) and a decrease in total SFAs in egg yolks, with the 2% FDRM group showing a pronounced decrease in total SFAs. Researches conducted by Zhang et al. (23) and Zhang et al. (24) revealed that supplementing laying hen diets with F. dibotrys stems and leaves or their extracts could improve the amino acids composition and content of whole eggs while significantly increasing the levels of C20:4 and C22:6 in egg yolks. Furthermore, Chen et al. (3) also reported that the contents of total unsaturated fatty acids, monounsaturated fatty acids, and polyunsaturated fatty acids in duck eggs showed an increasing trend with the dietary supplementation level of honeycomb extracts, while the total saturated fatty acids content decreased significantly. Our findings are in full accordance with these previously established conclusions. The potential mechanism is that the polyphenols in FDRM scavenge ROS, protecting PUFAs from oxidative degradation and thereby reducing lipid peroxidation (41). In addition, the flavonoids in F. dibotrys enhance fatty acids elongation, thereby increasing the deposition of PUFAs in egg yolks (34).

Serum biochemical parameters serve as critical indicators for assessing metabolic status and health conditions in animals, primarily encompassing serum enzymes, protein, and lipid metabolites. Serum TP, composed of ALB and GLB, reflects protein absorption and metabolism in the body. Elevated TP levels indicate enhanced protein metabolism and immune competence (4244). The experimental data confirmed that FDRM supplementation led to a marked rise in serum TP concentration, aligning with findings reported by Chen et al. (43) and Zhang et al. (24). Serum BUN levels serve as an indicator of protein and amino acids utilization, with decreased concentrations suggesting favorable amino acids balance (45). Tan et al. (44) discovered that dietary supplementation with 1% F. dibotrys in broilers decreased the serum BUN level. However, this study revealed that the 3% FDRM supplementation group significantly elevated the serum BUN content compared to the control group, diverging from the aforementioned findings. This discrepancy suggested that dietary FDRM supplementation should not exceed 3%, as higher levels may compromise protein utilization efficiency.

5 Conclusion

This study found that adding 2% FDRM to the diet of Shanma laying ducks could improve the shell strength, yolk color, and shell thickness in duck egg. Additionally, it improved the fatty acids profile, increased the levels of total amino acids, essential amino acids and umami amino acids in egg yolks. Concurrently, elevated the serum total protein levels indicated augmented physiological processes related to protein synthesis. These modifications suggested that 2% FDRM had a potential improvement in egg quality and egg nutritional value, with no negative impact on laying performance and health status of Shanma laying ducks. Under the conditions of this experiment, FDRM could be effectively utilized as a phytogenic feed additive in Shanma laying duck diets.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Ethics statement

The animal study was approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of the Institute of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary, Jiangxi Academy of Agricultural Science. The study was conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements.

Author contributions

PX: Conceptualization, Visualization, Methodology, Supervision, Investigation, Writing – original draft. GA: Writing – original draft, Formal analysis, Methodology. JC: Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing – review & editing. WSo: Software, Investigation, Writing – review & editing, Data curation. WSu: Software, Writing – review & editing, Validation, Data curation. DY: Supervision, Project administration, Writing – review & editing, Visualization. QS: Validation, Investigation, Data curation, Writing – review & editing, Software. CX: Software, Visualization, Data curation, Validation, Writing – review & editing. ZZ: Visualization, Project administration, Validation, Writing – review & editing, Supervision. QW: Supervision, Writing – review & editing, Visualization, Validation, Project administration. XC: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Writing – review & editing. LH: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This work was funded by Jiangxi Province Key Research and Development Program (20224BBF62003), the Earmarked Fund for Modern Agro-industry Technology Research System of China (CARS-42-43), Jiangxi Province Modern Agricultural Poultry Industry Technical System of China (JXARS-12), and Gan-Po Talented Youth Support Program the High-level and High-skill Leading Talent Training Project of Jiangxi Province (2023).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declare that no Gen AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

2. Peng, MJ, Huang, T, Yang, QL, Peng, S, Jin, YX, and Wang, XS. Dietary supplementation Eucommia ulmoides extract at high content served as a feed additive in the hens industry. Poult Sci. (2022) 101:101650. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2021.101650

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Chen, XL, Xiong, PW, Song, WJ, Song, QL, Zou, ZH, Huang, JN, et al. Dietary supplementation with honeycomb extracts positively improved egg nutritional and flavor quality, serum antioxidant and immune functions of laying ducks. Front Vet Sci. (2023) 10:1277293. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1277293

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Bird, JK, Calder, PC, and Eggersdorfer, M. The role of n-3 long chain polyunsaturated fatty acids in cardiovascular disease prevention, and interactions with statins. Nutrients. (2018) 10:775. doi: 10.3390/nu10060775

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Liu, BH, Ma, RY, Yang, QL, Yang, Y, Fang, YJ, Sun, ZH, et al. Effects of traditional Chinese herbal feed additive on production performance, egg quality, antioxidant capacity, immunity and intestinal health of laying hens. Animals. (2023) 13:13152510. doi: 10.3390/ani13152510

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Shen, SY, Lin, YY, Liao, SC, Wang, JS, Wang, SD, and Lien, CY. Effects of phytogenic feed additives on the growth, blood biochemistry, and caecal microorganisms of white roman geese. Czeh J Anim Sci. (2023) 68:202–11. doi: 10.17221/205/2022-cjas

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Song, WJ, Chen, J, Ai, GX, Xiong, PW, Song, QL, Wei, QP, et al. Mechanisms of the effects of Turpiniae folium extract on growth performance, immunity, antioxidant activity and intestinal barrier function in LPS-challenged broilers. Poult Sci. (2025) 104:104903. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2025.104903

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Song, WJ, Zou, ZH, Chen, XL, Tan, J, Liu, LX, Wei, QP, et al. Effects of traditional Chinese herbal feed supplement on growth performance, immunity, antioxidant levels, and intestinal health in chickens: a study on Ningdu yellow chickens. Poult Sci. (2023) 102:102986. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2023.102986

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Song, QL, Zou, ZH, Chen, XL, Ai, GX, Xiong, PW, Song, WJ, et al. Effect of Moringa oleifera leaf powder supplementation on growth performance, digestive enzyme activity, meat quality, and cecum microbiota of Ningdu yellow chickens. Agriculture. (2024) 14:1523. doi: 10.3390/agriculture14091523

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Chen, J, Song, QL, Wu, D, Zou, ZH, Gong, JP, Chen, XL, et al. Effects of honeysuckle stem and leaf powder on growth performance, immune function, antioxidant capacity and intestinal health of Ningdu yellow chickens. Chin J Anim Nutri. (2024) 36:3631–41. doi: 10.12418/CJAN2024.312

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Song, QL, Chen, J, Wu, D, Zou, ZH, Gong, JP, Chen, XL, et al. Effects of Tetrastigma hemsleyanum leaves powder on growth performance, serum biochemical index and jejunum morphology of Chongren patridge chickens. Chin Anim Husb Vet Med. (2024) 51:2481–8. doi: 10.16431/j.cnki.1671-7236.2024.06.022

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Shi, KZ, Zhang, X, Du, LC, Huang, B, Tan, Y, Jiang, XQ, et al. Investigate the effects of Qian Fagopyrum cymosum (Trev.) Meisn No.1 in Guizhou native porcine culture. Feed Res. (2020) 43:32–4. doi: 10.13557/j.cnki.issn1002-2813.2020.07.009

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Chen, C, and Li, A. Transcriptome analysis of differentially expressed genes involved in proanthocyanidin accumulation in the rhizomes of Fagopyrum dibotrys and an irradiation-induced mutant. Front Physiol. (2016) 7:100. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2016.00100

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Hou, ZP, Zheng, X, Chen, Q, and Wu, DQ. Nutritional value, bioactivity of extract and application in animal production of Fagopyrum dibotrys. Chin J Anim Nutri. (2021) 33:3019–27. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2021.06.003

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Jing, R, Li, HQ, Hu, CL, Jiang, YP, Qin, LP, and Zheng, CJ. Phytochemical and pharmacological profiles of three Fagopyrum buckwheats. Int J Mol Sci. (2016) 17:589–602. doi: 10.3390/ijms17040589

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Li, X, Liu, JL, Chang, QX, Zhou, ZY, Han, RL, and Liang, ZS. Antioxidant and antidiabetic activity of proanthocyanidins from Fagopyrum dibotrys. Molecules. (2021) 26:2417. doi: 10.3390/molecules26092417

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Zhang, LL, He, Y, Sheng, FY, Hu, YF, Song, Y, Li, W, et al. Towards a better understanding of Fagopyrum dibotrys: a systematic review. Chin Med. (2021) 16:89. doi: 10.1186/s13020-021-00498-z

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Zhang, M, Zhang, XK, Pei, J, Guo, BL, Zhang, GS, Li, MH, et al. Identification of phytochemical compounds of Fagopyrum dibotrys and their targets by metabolomics, network pharmacology and molecular docking studies. Heliyon. (2023) 9:e14029. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14029

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Chen, ZJ, Dai, GT, Wu, X, Li, L, Tian, YJ, and Tan, LL. Protective effects of Fagopyrum dibotrys on oxidized oil-induced oxidative stress, intestinal barrier impairment, and altered cecal microbiota in broiler chickens. Poult Sci. (2023) 102:102472. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2022.102472

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Wang, X, Zhao, BS, Ruan, YY, Xu, WC, Luo, ZC, Xu, JY, et al. Fagopyrum dibotrys rhizoma regulates pulmonary lipid metabolic homeostasis and the ERK-cPLA2 pathway to alleviate asthma in mice. Phytomedicine. (2024) 131:155782. doi: 10.1016/j.phymed.2024.155782

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Yang, T, Chen, XL, Hu, LZ, Zou, ZH, Wei, QP, and Wen, H. Advances in studies on the pharmacological effects of Fagopyrum dibotrys and its application in animal production. Pratac Sci. (2023) 40:2411–23. doi: 10.11829/j.issn.1001-0629.2022-0129

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Xiong, PW, Chen, XL, Hu, LZ, Song, QL, Wei, QP, Liu, LX, et al. Effects of golden buckwheat stem and leaf meal on reproductive performance, serum immune indices, antioxidant capacity and intestinal flora of Gannan Tibetan pigs. Chin J Anim Sci. (2023) 59:269–76. doi: 10.19556/j.0258-7033.20230221-06

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Zhang, R, Chen, GJ, Shang, YS, Li, SG, Li, XD, Xiong, XQ, et al. Effect of freshly feeding Fagopyrum dibotrys on performance, egg quality and serum index of heat stressed laying hens. Acta Pratacult Sin. (2020) 29:179–89. doi: 10.11686/cyxb2020080

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Zhang, R, Cheng, GJ, Nie, CS, Wu, JG, Pan, FQ, Liu, FD, et al. Effects of ambient temperature and Fagopyrum dibotrys extract supplemental level on performance, egg quality, and serum biochemical and immune indices of laying hens. Chin J Anim Nutri. (2023) 35:5708–23. doi: 10.12418/CJAN2023.526

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

25. AOAC. Official methods of analysis of AOAC international. 18th ed. Arlington, VA, USA: The Association of Official Analytical Chemists (2006).

Google Scholar

26. Zhang, B, Wang, ZB, Huang, CX, Wang, DH, Chang, DM, Shi, XW, et al. Positive effects of mulberry leaf extract on egg quality, lipid metabolism, serum biochemistry, and antioxidant indices of laying hens. Front Vet Sci. (2022) 9:1005643. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.1005643

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Cullere, M, Tasoniero, G, Giaccone, V, Acuti, G, Marangon, A, and Zotte, AD. Black soldier fly as dietary protein source for broiler quails: meat proximate composition, fatty acid and amino acid profile, oxidative status and sensory traits. Animal. (2018) 12:640–7. doi: 10.1017/s1751731117001860

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Xu, CH, Xiong, PW, Song, WJ, Song, QL, Hu, Y, Song, TX, et al. Effects of fermented navel orange pulp on growth performance, carcass characteristics, meat quality, meat nutritional value, and serum biochemical indicators of finishing Tibetan pigs. Foods. (2024) 13:1910. doi: 10.3390/foods13121910

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Hao, LH, Su, WF, Zhang, Y, Wang, C, Xu, BC, Jiang, ZP, et al. Effects of supplementing with fermented mixed feed on the performance and meat quality in finishing pigs. Anim Feed Sci Technol. (2020) 266:114501. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2020.114501

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Tan, LL, Zhang, DH, Zhang, J, Xu, ZH, and R, D. Effect of Fagopyrum dibotrys (D. Don) hara on growth performance, immune function and intestinal structure of broilers. China Anim Husb Vet Med. (2017) 44:3505–11. doi: 10.16431/j.cnki.1671-7236.2017.12.016

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Zhao, JL, Jiang, L, Tang, XH, Peng, LX, Li, X, Zhao, G, et al. Chemical composition, antimicrobial and antioxidant activities of the flower volatile oils of Fagopyrum esculentum, Fagopyrum tataricum and Fagopyrum cymosum. Molecules. (2018) 23:182. doi: 10.3390/molecules23010182

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Ting, S, Yeh, HS, and Lien, TF. Effects of supplemental levels of hesperetin and naringenin on egg quality, serum traits and antioxidant activity of laying hens. Anim Feed Sci Technol. (2011) 163:59–66. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2010.10.001

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Surai, PF. Polyphenol compounds in the chicken/animal diet: from the past to the future. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr. (2014) 98:19–31. doi: 10.1111/jpn.12070

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Feng, YL, Dai, GT, Han, X, Li, MJ, Zhao, DG, Wu, JH, et al. Feeding laying ducks Eucommia ulmoides oliv. Leaves increases the n-3 fatty acids content and decreases the n-6: n-3 PUFA ratio in egg yolk without affecting laying performance or egg quality. Foods. (2023) 12:287. doi: 10.3390/foods12020287

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Iskender, H, Yenice, G, Dokumacioglu, E, Kaynar, O, Hayirli, A, and Kaya, A. Comparison of the effects of dietary supplementation of flavonoids on laying hen performance, egg quality and egg nutrient profile. Br Poult Sci. (2017) 58:550–6. doi: 10.1080/00071668.2017.1349297

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Xie, T, Bai, SP, Zhang, KY, Ding, XM, Wang, JP, Zeng, QF, et al. Effects of Lonicera confusa and Astragali Radix extracts supplementation on egg production performance, egg quality, sensory evaluation, and antioxidative parameters of laying hens during the late laying period. Poult Sci. (2019) 98:4838–47. doi: 10.3382/ps/pez219

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Ji, FJ, Gu, LH, Rong, G, Hu, CJ, Sun, WP, Wang, DF, et al. Using extract from the stems and leaves of Yizhi (Alpiniae oxyphyllae) as feed additive increases meat quality and intestinal health in ducks. Front Vet Sci. (2022) 8:8. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.793698

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Tian, XZ, Li, JX, Luo, QY, Wang, X, Xiao, MM, Zhou, D, et al. Effect of supplementation with selenium-yeast on muscle antioxidant activity, meat quality, fatty acids and amino acids in goats. Front Vet Sci. (2022) 8:8. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.813672

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Yao, BN, Liao, FY, Yang, JY, Liu, A, Wang, J, Zhu, BG, et al. Effect of sea buckthorn extract on production performance, serum biochemical indexes, egg quality, and cholesterol deposition of laying ducks. Front Vet Sci. (2023) 10:1127117. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1127117

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Lenighan, YM, McNulty, BA, and Roche, HM. Dietary fat composition: replacement of saturated fatty acids with PUFA as a public health strategy, with an emphasis on -linolenic acid. Proc Nutr Soc. (2019) 78:234–45. doi: 10.1017/s0029665118002793

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Efenberger-Szmechtyk, M, Nowak, A, and Czyzowska, A. Plant extracts rich in polyphenols: antibacterial agents and natural preservatives for meat and meat products. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. (2021) 61:149–78. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2020.1722060

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Wang, YL, Xue, YY, Sun, HB, Nan, SS, Zhang, WJ, and Nie, CX. Effects of mulberry leaf extract on growth performance, slaughter performance, organ indexes, serum biochemical indexes and nutrient apparent digestibility of yellow feather broilers. Chin J Anim Nutri. (2023) 35:5049–58. doi: 10.12418/CJAN2023.468

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Chen, KL, Gui, GH, Shen, LL, Ren, MM, and Xu, E. Effects of adding buckwheat stem and leaf powder on meat quality and blood biochemical indexes in growing pigs. Guizhou J Anim Husb Vet Med. (2020) 44:5–8. Available online at: https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=0AK9bEv8tW35g99EpLxtNaYTMOEyoXjByE-K01Zr-kdCQ2DaR1LwsmabDW9n_dsBv0dmBrmgYeCstGAV0DGmyqgSjsTFq-Y_NOdSHFzXoypwwkt2H3p9wMyaoxIDmyiDBR_W0eBXr7sm9cEyE-3FK5CvQtM_PtNXd2EICsduLld6ndKPDK8cSQ==&uniplatform=NZKPT&language=CHS

Google Scholar

44. Tan, LL, Zhang, DH, Zhang, J, and Deng, R. Effects of golden buckwheat on antioxidant function, intestinal barrier function and serum biochemical indexes of broilers. Jiangsu Agric Sci. (2019) 47:232–5. doi: 10.15889/j.issn.1002-1302.2019.21.056

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Liu, XJ, Li, W, Chen, J, Ma, XD, Chen, C, Liu, HY, et al. Effects of compound Chinese herbal medicine on growth performance, serum immune, protein metabolism, and anti-stress indices of weaned piglets. Chin J Anim Nutri. (2025) 37:194–203. doi: 10.12418/CJAN2025.017

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: Fagopyrum dibotrys rhizoma meal, productive performance, egg quality, egg nutritional value, serum biochemical parameters, Shanma laying ducks

Citation: Xiong P, Ai G, Chen J, Song W, Su W, Yu D, Song Q, Xu C, Zou Z, Wei Q, Chen X and Hu L (2025) Effects of Fagopyrum dibotrys rhizoma meal supplementation on productive performance, egg quality, egg nutritional value, and serum biochemical parameters of Shanma laying ducks. Front. Vet. Sci. 12:1654416. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1654416

Received: 26 June 2025; Accepted: 24 July 2025;
Published: 06 August 2025.

Edited by:

Arda Yıldırım, Gaziosmanpaşa University, Türkiye

Reviewed by:

Hongzhi Wu, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences, China
Basima Mohammed, University of Al-Qadisiyah, Iraq

Copyright © 2025 Xiong, Ai, Chen, Song, Su, Yu, Song, Xu, Zou, Wei, Chen and Hu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Xiaolian Chen, Y2hlbnhsQGp4YWFzLmNu; Lizhen Hu, aHVsaXpoZW4xOTgwQGp4YWFzLmNu

These authors have contributed equally to this work

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.