Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Vet. Sci., 09 January 2026

Sec. Livestock Genomics

Volume 12 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2025.1676247

Molecular profiling of signaling pathways involved in chicken ovarian follicle development by transcriptome sequencing

  • 1State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
  • 2Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, Key Lab of Chicken Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affair, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China
  • 3Department of Breeding and Genetics, Cholistan University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Bahawalpur, Pakistan

Ovarian follicle development in chickens is a dynamic and closely controlled biological process crucial to avian reproduction. Each stage of folliculogenesis is characterized by distinct morphological and molecular alterations, regulated by complex signaling pathways. This study employed transcriptome sequencing to investigate the molecular landscape that governs the transition from primordial (PR) to primary (PM), small white (SW), and small yellow (SY) follicles. We found stage-specific activation of critical signaling pathways involved in follicle growth and development using thorough differential gene expression and pathway enrichment analyses. Our findings showed that the PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway was highly elevated throughout the shift from PR to PM follicles, highlighting its importance in beginning cellular proliferation and protein synthesis. During development, the Wnt signaling system was regulated from the PM to the SW follicles. This included β-catenin-mediated transcriptional regulation, granulosa cell proliferation, and communication between oocytes and somatic cells. Furthermore, the transition from SW to SY follicles was characterized by a significant increase in glycerophospholipid metabolism, emphasizing the metabolic reprogramming required for rapid cellular development and membrane production. The combination of transcriptome data and route mapping provides essential insights into the molecular mechanisms underpinning folliculogenesis in chickens. The signaling pathways revealed the representative stage-specific regulatory networks required for optimal follicle development. These findings enhance our understanding of avian ovarian biology and suggest potential targets for improving reproductive efficiency in chickens.

Introduction

Reproductive efficiency is crucial for sustaining poultry production (1). In chickens, ovarian follicular development follows a hierarchical progression, allowing for phase-specific study from the dormant PR to the pre-ovulatory stage (2). While follicular dynamics are central to avian reproduction, the molecular mechanisms driving early follicular transitions remain poorly understood (3). Existing studies have focused on hormonal regulation, granulosa cell behavior, and morphology; however, these approaches fall short in elucidating the complex gene regulatory networks involved (4). High-throughput transcriptome sequencing, particularly RNA-Seq, enables a detailed analysis of gene expression and reveals novel transcripts and splicing events critical for follicle maturation (5). However, transcriptomic profiling of early stages, especially PR and PM follicles, is limited in chickens, underscoring the need for targeted studies on early follicular development (6, 7).

In chickens, ovarian follicular development follows a specific sequence, including PR, PM, SW, SY, and pre-ovulatory follicles, each representing a crucial phase in folliculogenesis (8). PR follicles, consisting of a single layer of granulosa cells, constitute the ovarian reserve (9, 10). The initial phase encompasses granulosa cell proliferation, cuboidal cell transformation, and oocyte reactivation (4). SW follicles exhibit heightened transcriptional activity, whereas SY follicles commence yolk buildup and follicle selection (11, 12). Comprehending the molecular signals that facilitate these transitions is crucial for clarifying the mechanisms of recruitment, selection, and differentiation (13). Essential signaling pathways, including the PI3K-Akt, MAPK, Wnt, TGF-β, and Notch pathways, govern processes such as cell proliferation, apoptosis, adhesion, and steroidogenesis by integrating hormonal (e.g., FSH, LH) and intrinsic signals (14). Mammalian studies have associated PI3K-Akt with follicle activation and TGF-β members, such as GDF9 and BMP15, with granulosa cell function (15); however, their roles in avian folliculogenesis remain inadequately characterized. While the PI3K-Akt and Wnt pathways have been recognized in chicken ovaries (15, 16), the stage-specific and temporal expression data remain insufficient.

Transcriptomic analysis at specific phases of follicular development facilitates the discovery of gene expression dynamics and signaling networks involved in folliculogenesis (16). Comparing the transcriptomes of PR, PM, SW, and follicles enables the mapping of the molecular landscape of follicular advancement and the identification of critical regulatory genes and pathways that facilitate developmental changes (17). This method enhances our understanding of chicken ovarian biology and identifies potential indicators and molecular targets for genetic enhancement or biotechnological intervention to optimize reproductive efficiency (18, 19). Moreover, these analyses provide insights into conserved and species-specific mechanisms relevant to comparative reproductive biology (20).

This study utilized high-throughput RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) to elucidate transcriptome patterns during the four early follicular phases of chickens. We discovered essential signaling pathways and molecular regulators with stage-specific expression patterns by differential gene expression analysis, functional annotation, and pathway enrichment. Emphasis was placed on cellular development, differentiation, extracellular matrix remodeling, and intercellular communication processes. These findings establish a basis for forthcoming functional investigations aimed at manipulating follicular dynamics to enhance reproductive efficiency in poultry.

Materials and methods

Animals and sample collection

Healthy adult laying hens (Chinese Xinghua chicken, Gallus gallus domesticus), aged 25 to 30 weeks and kept under standard poultry house conditions, were chosen for this study. Birds were euthanised using cervical dislocation, adhering to institutional animal care and ethical guidelines. Following euthanasia, the ovaries were separated, placed in ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and transported to the laboratory for processing.

Follicle classification and isolation

Follicles were dissected using a stereomicroscope and classified into four developmental stages according to size, pigmentation, and morphology: PR follicles (PF, <80 μm, characterized by a single layer of flattened granulosa cells), PM follicles (PR, 80–1,000 μm, featuring cuboidal granulosa cells), SW follicles (SWF, 2–4 mm, translucent), and SY follicles (SYF, 4–6 mm, yellow-pigmented). Follicles from three distinct animals were combined for each category to establish biological triplicates (Figure 1). For the transcriptome analysis, we collected three biological replicates from each category, with each replicate consisting of 12 chicken follicles.

Figure 1
Flowchart illustrating a scientific process: Animal selection leads to chicken ovaries, followed by follicles grading using a microscope. Samples preparation involves placing contents in tubes, proceeding to transcriptome analysis. Data analysis results in validation with RT-qPCR/WB, concluding with a discussion phase.

Figure 1. Graphical summary of the experimental workflow used in the study. The process involves animal selection and the collection of chicken ovaries, as well as follicle grading and sample preparation, followed by transcriptome sequencing. Data analysis and validation using RT-qPCR and Western blot (WB) led to the interpretation and discussion of signaling pathways involved in follicle development.

RNA extraction and quality assessment

Following established protocols, total RNA was extracted from each follicular stage utilizing TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, USA). Follicle tissues were homogenized in TRIzol, followed by RNA extraction via phase separation using chloroform, isopropanol precipitation, and ethanol washing. The RNA pellets obtained were resuspended in RNase-free water. RNA purity and concentration were assessed with a NanoDrop spectrophotometer, while RNA integrity was verified using an Agilent 2,100 Bioanalyzer. Samples with RIN values exceeding 7.0 were selected for sequencing.

Transcriptome library preparation and RNA sequencing

RNA samples from each follicular group, with three replicates, were used to construct sequencing libraries employing the NEBNext Ultra RNA Library Prep Kit from New England Biolabs. Messenger RNA was isolated using oligo(dT) magnetic beads and subsequently fragmented, resulting in the synthesis of both the first and second complementary DNA (cDNA) strands. Subsequent steps involved end repair, adaptor ligation, and PCR amplification. The quality and quantity of the library were assessed through Qubit fluorometry and Bioanalyzer analysis. Sequencing was conducted using the Illumina NovaSeq 6,000 platform, yielding 150 bp paired-end reads and an average of 40 million clean reads per sample.

Transcriptome data processing and DEG analysis

Raw sequencing data were first evaluated with FastQC and subsequently processed with Trimmomatic to eliminate low-quality reads and adaptors. Clean reads were aligned to the Gallus gallus reference genome (GRCg6a) utilizing HISAT2. Transcript assembly and expression quantification were conducted using StringTie, with gene expression measured in FPKM units. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified using DESeq2, with a threshold of |log2 fold change| ≥ 1 and an adjusted p-value < 0.05. Gene expression patterns were analyzed using Venn diagrams, hierarchical clustering heatmaps, volcano plots, and principal component analysis (PCA) in R.

Gene ontology and KEGG pathway enrichment

The ClusterProfiler package in R was used to perform functional enrichment analysis on differentially expressed genes (DEGs). Gene Ontology (GO) terms are categorized into three main classifications: biological processes (BP), molecular functions (MF), and cellular components (CC). Conversely, the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) analysis revealed enriched pathways during follicular transitions. Significance was assessed using a Benjamini–Hochberg adjusted p-value of less than 0.05. The enrichment results were represented as bar plots, differentiating upregulated (red) and downregulated (blue) gene categories throughout developmental stages.

Protein–protein interaction (PPI) and hub gene identification

Key regulatory genes were identified by inputting differentially expressed genes (DEGs) into the STRING database to construct protein–protein interaction (PPI) networks. Network files were visualized and analyzed using Cytoscape (v3.9), with hub genes identified through the cytoHubba plugin, utilizing degree centrality as the criterion. Three transition-specific networks were developed for PF to PR, PR to SWF, and SWF to SYF. Nodes exhibiting the highest connectivity were identified as hub genes, signifying their pivotal roles in follicular regulation.

Signaling pathway modeling

Three core signaling pathways were reconstructed based on transcriptomic and enrichment results: the COL6A1-PTEN-PIP3-AKT pathway, which is active during the transition from PF to PR; the Wnt/β-catenin-TCF/LEF pathway, which operates during the PR to SWF stage; and PLB1-mediated glycerophospholipid metabolism, which governs the shift from SWF to SYF. The signaling pathways were illustrated using BioRender, https://app.diagrams.net/#, and https://app.diagrams.net/#, drawing on KEGG data and pertinent literature to depict the dynamic regulation of folliculogenesis (assessed on 20-06-2025).

Statistical and bioinformatics analysis

The statistical analysis of transcriptome data involved differential gene expression (DGE) analysis utilizing edgeR or DESeq2 to identify significant signaling pathways among the four follicle groups: primordial, primary, small white, and small yellow. Pairwise comparisons of consecutive follicle stages were performed to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs), with expression data normalized using methods including TMM (Trimmed Mean of M-values) or DESeq2’s median of ratios. The significance threshold for identifying DEGs was set at a p-value < 0.05, with the false discovery rate (FDR) controlled using the Benjamini-Hochberg correction. Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analysis were used to interpret the biological functions and signaling pathways associated with DEGs. Statistical analyses were conducted using R software, utilizing Bioconductor packages for differential gene expression analysis, normalization, and pathway enrichment, thereby ensuring precise interpretation of transcriptome alterations during follicle development.

qRT-PCR validation of DEGs

Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) was performed on selected differentially expressed genes (DEGs) to validate the transcriptomic data, with a focus on key signaling and metabolic pathways. Each group’s micrograms of total RNA were reverse-transcribed utilizing the PrimeScript RT reagent kit (Takara) (21). Quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) was performed utilizing SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems) on a StepOnePlus Real-Time PCR system. Primer sequences were developed using Primer-BLAST and assessed for amplification efficiency. Expression data were normalized to β-actin and analyzed using the 2^–ΔΔCt method (22). All reactions were conducted in triplicate, and statistical analysis was performed using ANOVA, followed by Tukey’s post hoc test, with significance established at p < 0.05.

Results

Follicular characteristics across developmental stages

Figures 2A,B display representative microscope images that depict the morphological features of primordial (PR) and primary (PM) follicles extracted from chicken ovaries. Panel A illustrates the PR and PM follicles as small, densely clustered entities situated within a compact ovarian stroma. The follicles generally comprise a centrally positioned oocyte encircled by a single layer of flattened or slightly cuboidal granulosa cells. Their diminutive size, irregular shape, and comparatively low cytoplasmic volume align with the characteristics of early-stage follicular architecture. The observations indicate that the follicles in this group exemplify the earliest and most undifferentiated stages of ovarian development. Panel B illustrates primary follicles, which exhibit a notable increase in size and a more distinct spherical morphology relative to primordial follicles. The oocyte is surrounded by a denser and more uniform layer of granulosa cells, signifying the transition from primordial to early growing follicles. The increased follicular diameter and enhanced cellular boundaries indicate the onset of follicular activation and the commencement of granulosa cell proliferation. The morphological differences between Panels A and B illustrate the structural development occurring in the early stages of chicken folliculogenesis. The images serve as visual confirmation of the staged classification employed for subsequent transcriptomic and functional analyses.

Figure 2
Panel A shows an image of primordial follicles under a microscope with a scale of 0 to 200. Panel B displays primary follicles with a scale of 0 to 600. The right image depicts various follicles on a plate, labeled SWF and SYF. Panel D features a row of follicles from SWF to F1, with sizes increasing from left to right, alongside a ruler for scale.

Figure 2. (A–D) A morphological comparison between PR and SY follicles. (A,B) Representative picture of PR follicles, showing small oocytes surrounded by a single layer of flattened granulosa cells, and panel B represents an image of PM follicles at a more advanced stage, with cuboidal granulosa cells enclosing the oocyte. The images (A) were captured with a microscope (50i; Nikon, Japan) at 100 × resolution (C). The image depicts SW follicles (SWF) and SY follicles (SYF) in a petri dish. The SYF are bigger and have a characteristic yellow color, indicating advanced follicular maturity. (D) The image exhibits a variety of SW follicles (SWF) and SY follicles (SYF), with distinct sizes and structures. The size of the SYF gradually increases as follicular development progresses.

Figure 2C shows SWF and SYF follicles in a petri plate, clearly distinguishing them. SWF are smaller, more transparent, and less mature than SYF, which are larger and yellower, indicating higher lipid buildup. Steroidogenesis increases as follicles yellow, signaling a developmental shift to maturity. The size disparities of these follicles revealed the various stages of follicular development. Figure 2D shows a comparable contrast between SW and SY follicles, showing a visible trend in size. Scaled SYFs are consistently larger and more spherical, indicating a more advanced state of follicular development. The development from early folliculogenesis to a more differentiated state is significant. Additionally, the illustration depicts the growth of SY follicles from F1 to F4, with a visible size gradation across developmental phases. These findings help explain the variation in follicular size and the structural alterations that occur throughout maturation.

Transcriptome analysis of chicken follicles

To investigate the molecular dynamics underpinning chicken ovarian follicle development, transcriptome profiling was performed at four critical developmental stages: PR, PM, SW, and SY follicles. The study of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) indicated unique transcriptional alterations between stages. Additional data are presented in Supplementary Tables 1–7, which include genes and corresponding protein accession numbers (DEGs) associated with follicular development. As shown in Figure 3A, the Venn diagram displays 2006 DEGs for PR vs. PM (G1), 4435 for PM vs. SW (G2), and 5904 for SW vs. SY (G3). A core collection of 323 genes showed differential expression across all three transitions, indicating a critical involvement in follicular development. Furthermore, subsets of stage-specific DEGs were discovered, emphasizing the uniqueness of gene expression changes at each transition.

Figure 3
A three-part graphic illustrates gene analysis. Part A shows a Venn diagram with overlapping sets, representing shared and unique genes among groups PR4PM, PM4SW, and SW8SY. A bar chart below displays the number of genes in each group: G1 (2006), G2 (4355), and G3 (5904). Part B features a heatmap with hierarchical clustering, showing gene expression across samples HSW, HPM, and HPR, with values ranging from -3 to 3 and groups A to D. Part C presents a scatter plot for principal component analysis, displaying groups PM, PR, SW, and SY across PC1 and PC2 axes with percentages 49.5% and 40.9% respectively.

Figure 3. (A) Depicts a Venn diagram comparing DEGs across PR vs. PM, PM vs. SW, and SW vs. SY, with 323 genes showing differential expression across all stages. The accompanying bar chart shows how DEG numbers gradually grow as developmental shifts occur. (B) Shows a hierarchical clustering heat map that reveals four distinct gene expression patterns and stage-specific changes in gene regulation. (C) Describes a PCA plot in which samples are strongly clustered by follicular stage, with PC1 and PC2 accounting for 49.5 and 40.9% of the variance, respectively, showing unique transcriptome profiles and high biological repeatability.

Figure 3B an illustration of hierarchical clustering of the DEGs, which emphasizes stage-specific transcription patterns. The heatmap shows different expression patterns among biological replicates from each follicular stage, indicating reproducible data. Genes were classified into four PM clusters (A-D) based on their expression trends, with significant upregulation or downregulation associated with specific developmental stages. For example, Group A and B genes were primarily expressed in the early stages (PR and PM). In contrast, Group C and D genes were expressed more strongly in the later stages (SW and SY), indicating progressive molecular alterations during follicular growth and selection.

Principal component analysis (PCA) was initially performed to assess the overall quality, intra-group repeatability, and inter-group variation of the follicle samples (Figure 3C). The PCA plot demonstrated distinct separation among the PR, PM, SW, and SY stages along PC1 and PC2, which accounted for 49.5 and 40.9% of the total variance, respectively. Biological replicates exhibited close clustering within each group, demonstrating significant intra-group consistency. To validate the reliability of sample grouping, 95% confidence intervals were estimated for each cluster, showing minimal overlap among the PR, PM, SW, and SY groups. The intervals validated the stability of stage-specific transcriptional patterns and underscored the biological distinctions among the four follicular stages.

Additionally, 95% confidence intervals were computed for each sample cluster on the PCA plot, demonstrating tight clustering within groups and minimal overlap between developmental stages, thus affirming the reliability of the transcriptomic classification.

Gene ontology pathways enrichment analysis

To investigate the functional dynamics underlying chicken ovarian follicle development, we used GO enrichment analysis to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs) at three key transitions: PR to PM follicles (Figure 4A), PM to SW follicles (Figure 4B), and SW to SY follicles (Figure 4C). The DEGs were divided into three major GO categories: biological process (BP), molecular function (MF), and cellular components. Upregulated genes were primarily associated with cellular responses to stimulation, signal transduction, and developmental processes during the transition from PR to PM follicles. In contrast, downregulated genes were related to metabolic processes and RNA processing. The number of downregulated genes increased significantly from PM to SW follicles stage, particularly in pathways related to translation, ribosome biogenesis, and ribosome structural features, indicating a potential shift in translational control.

Figure 4
Three bar graphs labeled A, B, and C display Level 2 Gene Ontology (GO) terms across categories: Biological Process (BP), Molecular Function (MF), and Cellular Component (CC). Each graph compares the number of upregulated and downregulated genes, color-coded in red and teal, across various terms such as cellular process, biological regulation, and metabolic process. The x-axis lists GO terms, while the y-axis shows the number of genes.

Figure 4. (A–C) Gene ontology (GO) examination of the stages of follicular development in chickens. (A) Illustrates the shift from PR to PM follicles, (B) depicts the development from PM to SW follicles, and (C) demonstrates the advancement from SW to SY follicles. The x-axis represents the specific GO terms, while the y-axis displays the number of genes linked to each phrase. The red bars denote phrases associated with “upregulated” genes, whereas the blue bars indicate those related to “downregulated” genes during the stages of follicular development.

In contrast, fewer elevated genes at this stage indicate stronger regulatory control. During the development of SW to SY follicles, both upregulated and downregulated genes helped to achieve a more equal distribution across gene ontology analysis. Upregulated genes were primarily involved in hormone activity, extracellular matrix architecture, and receptor binding, indicating follicular differentiation and hormonal responsiveness. These patterns highlight stage-specific regulatory alterations in gene expression, with early stages characterized by signaling and cellular activation, mid-stages by repression of biosynthetic machinery, and late stages by structural and hormonal specialization.

KEGG pathways enrichment analysis

KEGG pathway enrichment analysis was employed to examine differentially expressed genes during the transition from PR to SY follicles. Figure 5A illustrates the top 20 KEGG enrichment pathways identified in one of the comparative groups during our transcriptome analysis of chicken ovarian follicle development. The pathway with the highest enrichment was “Neuroactive ligand-receptor interaction,” followed by pathways associated with immune and inflammatory responses, including “Malaria,” “Th1 and Th2 cell differentiation,” and “Inflammatory bowel disease.” Significant pathways related to cellular structure and communication, such as cell adhesion molecules and ECM-receptor interactions, were also highlighted. Additionally, numerous cancer-related pathways, including “Pathways in cancer” and “PD-L1 expression and PD-1 checkpoint pathway,” as well as essential signaling cascades such as “Calcium signaling pathway,” “cAMP signaling pathway,” and “Cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction,” were significantly enriched, indicating their possible involvement in follicular development and regulation.

Figure 5
Three KEGG enrichment scatter plots labeled A, B, and C display the top 20 pathways based on RichFactor and gene number. Each plot has dots of varying size and color, indicating gene number and q-value, respectively. Plot A highlights pathways like cardiac muscle contraction. Plot B emphasizes inflammatory pathways including inflammatory bowel disease. Plot C features pathways such as ECM-receptor interaction.

Figure 5. (A,C) KEGG pathway enrichment analysis of phases in chicken follicular development. (A) Depicts pathways enriched during the shift from PR to PM follicles, (B) demonstrates the transition from PM to SW follicles. (C) Presents the development from SW to SY follicles. The x-axis indicates the number of genes implicated. Simultaneously, pathways are categorized and color-coded according to biological classifications, including metabolism, genetic information processing, cellular activities, organismal systems, and diseases. This study elucidates critical processes governing follicular proliferation across several developmental stages.

Figure 5B presents the KEGG enrichment results for an additional comparative group, emphasizing unique metabolic and signaling pathways. The interaction between ECM and receptors was the most enriched, highlighting the significance of extracellular matrix dynamics in follicle maturation. Prominent metabolic pathways such as “Arachidonic acid metabolism,” “Linoleic acid metabolism,” and “Ether lipid metabolism” suggest active lipid-based signaling. Multiple neural and synaptic pathways, including neuroactive ligand-receptor interactions, glutamatergic synapses, and GABAergic synapses, were found to be enriched, in addition to immune-related terms such as inflammatory bowel disease and Type I diabetes mellitus. The presence of the cAMP signaling pathway, Relaxin signaling pathway, and ovarian steroidogenesis indicates their significance in hormonal regulation and steroid production processes essential for ovarian function.

Figure 5C presents the most enriched pathways for a third group, highlighting an emphasis on structural, immune, and disease-specific pathways. Neuroactive ligand-receptor interactions were again prominently featured. The enrichment of cardiac and muscular pathways, specifically “Cardiac muscle contraction” and “Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy,” suggests potential shared regulatory mechanisms with muscle tissue. Significant immune and inflammatory pathways include “Cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction,” “NOD-like receptor signaling pathway,” “Graft-versus-host disease,” and “Type I diabetes mellitus.” Furthermore, pathways regulating cell junctions and polarity, such as cell adhesion molecules and tight junctions, along with significant signaling cascades like the calcium signaling pathway and MAPK signaling pathway, as well as terms related to ovarian steroidogenesis, including bile secretion and circadian entrainment, were identified, providing a thorough overview of the intricate regulatory network involved in folliculogenesis. The three KEGG enrichment analyses collectively illustrate a complex molecular landscape in chicken ovarian follicle development, highlighting neuroendocrine signaling, immune modulation, metabolic regulation, cell adhesion and communication, and canonical developmental pathways, all contributing to follicular growth and maturation.

Identification of hub genes during follicular development

A hub gene network analysis was performed to examine the molecular framework of chicken folliculogenesis across three developmental transitions. The transition from PR to PM follicles (Figure 6A) identified several key transcription factors and signaling molecules with significant connectivity, including COL6A1, FOXE3, and SOX2. The genes are primarily associated with neurogenesis, cell fate determination, and inflammatory signaling, suggesting a significant reprogramming phase during the initial recruitment of follicles. The transition from PM to SW follicles (Figure 6B) involved a shift in gene expression of the Wnt family (Wnt1, Wnt5, Wnt11). These are primarily linked to the modulation of immune responses and Wnt signaling, indicating that immune regulation and morphogenic cues are crucial at this stage. During the transition from SW to yellow follicles (Figure 6C), key genes such as COL1A1, TGFB1, MYC, and PLB1 were predominant in the interaction network. These genes regulate extracellular matrix remodeling, cell proliferation, and hormone responsiveness, which are essential for follicular growth and differentiation. The progressive rewiring of hub gene networks across developmental stages highlights specific regulatory modules that coordinate ovarian follicle development, ranging from initial activation signals to structural and functional specialization.

Figure 6
Three interconnected gene network diagrams labeled A, B, and C. Each network consists of circular nodes with gene names, connected by lines, indicating interactions. Nodes are color-coded, with colors ranging from yellow to red, suggesting varying levels of interaction.

Figure 6. (A,C) Identification of hub genes in chicken follicular development phases by Cytoscape software analysis. (A) Hub gene network transitioning from PR to PM follicles, (B) hub gene network transitioning from PM to SW follicles, and (C) from SW to SY follicles. Nodes signify essential genes, with color intensity denoting their level of connectivity (red suggesting greater connectedness and yellow indicating lesser connectivity). Edges represent interactions among genes. These hub genes likely provide essential regulatory functions in follicle activation, growth, and differentiation throughout each of the embryonic phases.

Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR)

We utilized quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) to analyze the expression of key genes involved in follicular development in chickens at various stages of follicular development (Figures 7AC). PM follicles increased AKT1, mTOR, and RPS6KB1 levels, while indicating reduced levels of PTEN compared to PR follicles. Activating the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway is essential for follicular development. Elevated levels of AKT1 and mTOR and reduced PTEN indicate that this signaling pathway facilitates early follicular growth. CTNNB1, WNT1, and JNK levels were elevated from PM to SW follicles. The elevated expression of CTNNB1 and WNT1 indicates an enhanced Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway, which may promote granulosa cell proliferation and follicular maturation. During this intermediate developmental phase, elevated JNK expression, a gene associated with stress signaling and cellular proliferation, may enhance cellular remodeling or survival signaling. SW and SY follicles demonstrated higher levels of PCYT1A and ETNK1, genes related to the Kennedy pathway for phospholipid synthesis. These gene expression profiles illustrate the essential signaling and metabolic activities involved in follicle development. Stage-specific expression patterns indicate the coordinated control of pathways, such as the PI3K/AKT/mTOR and Wnt/β-catenin pathways, alongside metabolic alterations that facilitate follicular growth and differentiation.

Figure 7
Bar charts labeled A, B, and C compare gene expression in different follicle types. Chart A shows gene expression in primordial and primary follicles, Chart B shows primary and small white follicles, and Chart C shows small white and small yellow follicles. Fold change is on the y-axis, and gene names are on the x-axis. Each chart uses red and blue bars to denote different follicle types, with significant differences marked by asterisks.

Figure 7. (A–C) Quantitative mRNA expression levels of key genes associated with follicular development at various stages of chicken ovarian follicles, as assessed by qRT-PCR. (A) Comparison of PR and PM follicles reveals a notable overexpression of AKT1, mTOR, and RPS6KB1, accompanied by a downregulation of PTEN, FOXO3, RBL2, and CDKN1B. (B) CTNNB1, WNT1, and JNK expression levels are markedly elevated in SW relative to SY follicles. (C) The expression levels of PCYT1A and ETNK1 are increased significantly in SY follicles compared to SW follicles. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 3). Asterisks (*) denote statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) among the groups being compared.

Discussion

The developmental pathway of chicken ovaries exhibits a distinct evolution in physical characteristics, closely corresponding to the underlying molecular mechanisms (23). PR follicles were revealed to contain small oocytes surrounded by a single layer of granulosa cells, indicating their dormant state (24). Conversely, PM follicles exhibited cuboidal granulosa cells, indicating the initiation of follicular activation (25). The morphological metamorphosis persisted in SW follicles (SWFs) and SY follicles (SYFs), where alterations in follicle size, shape, and color were apparent (23, 26). The structural changes, such as lipid accumulation in SYFs, suggest the initiation of steroidogenesis and prepare the follicle for ovulatory function (27).

The transcriptomic analysis of chicken ovarian follicle development has demonstrated a tightly regulated, stage-specific molecular pathway necessary for folliculogenesis (28, 29). The transition from PR to PM follicles is characterized by the upregulation of differentially expressed genes primarily associated with cell division, proliferation, and signal transduction, indicating the onset of follicular activation (30). The downregulation of lipid metabolism-related terms suggests that energy metabolism is involved in cellular growth and differentiation (31). Increasing the extracellular matrix (ECM), associated with cellular components, facilitates the structural remodeling required for follicle growth (32). KEGG and Gene Ontology enrichment analyses confirmed these findings, highlighting the early-stage activation of key biological processes, including carbohydrate and lipid metabolism, ribosomal function, and the PI3K-Akt and Wnt signaling pathways (33).

Hub gene analysis of follicle development reveals regulatory changes that regulate the folliculogenesis signaling pathways. From PR to PM, genes such as COL6A1, FOXL2, and SHH become important hubs, initiating the COL6A1-PTEN-PIP3-AKT signaling pathway (34). This pathway facilitates cellular growth and anti-apoptotic signals that may support early follicle survival and granulosa cell proliferation (35, 36). During the PM to SW development, hub genes, including Wnt5 (37), LCP2 (38), and TCF7, indicate that the Wnt/β-catenin-TCF/LEF signaling axis dominates follicle selection and oocyte-granulosa cell communication. Finally, PLB1 and other metabolism-related genes, such as ALB and GPD1, show metabolic reprogramming, notably via the PLB1-regulated glycerophospholipid metabolism pathway, in SW to SY follicles. This shift promotes energy-intensive membrane biosynthesis (39) and follicular growth. These stage-specific hub gene networks illustrate how signaling and metabolic pathways are coordinated to promote the development of chicken ovarian follicles.

As follicles progressed from PM to SW and subsequently to SY stages, their transcriptomic profiles exhibited increasing specialization. The GO analysis conducted during the PM-to-SW transition highlighted the roles of protein binding (35), hormone regulation (36), and cellular communication (35), aligning with the initiation of meiotic activity and the development of oocyte competence (40). The subsequent development of these follicles indicated an essential shift in steroidogenesis, lipid metabolism, and endocrine regulation (38), highlighting the preparation for ovulation (41). KEGG pathway analysis revealed significant activation of steroid hormone biosynthesis and ECM-receptor interactions (42). Hub gene analysis indicated a biological transition from transcriptional regulation (FOXE3, SOX2) to immune modulation (CD74, TLR7), followed by ECM remodeling (COL1A1, FN1) and growth factor signaling (TGFβ1, FGF9). These findings suggest that follicular development in chickens is governed by a complex interplay of metabolic, hormonal, and structural signals, offering crucial insights into the molecular basis of avian reproductive biology.

COL6A1/FOXO3-PTEN-PIP3-AKT signaling pathway

Transitioning from PR to PM follicles is a key step in regulating chicken ovarian folliculogenesis (43, 44). The transition of these follicles involves the PTEN-PI3K-AKT pathway as a key regulatory mechanism (Figures 8AD). This pathway regulates the activation of PR follicles through downstream effectors that govern protein synthesis and cell survival (45, 46). The current study revealed that genes encoding critical components, including PI3K, AKT, and mTOR, showed upregulation, indicating enhanced mTORC1 activity (Figure 8B). This activation enhances protein synthesis by phosphorylating 4EBP1 and S6K1, subsequently initiating granulosa cell proliferation and oocyte growth (47). The PI3K-AKT pathway regulates the participation the signaling pathways that control follicular development (48). COL6A1, which encodes the α1 chain of type VI collagen, is a structural part of the extracellular matrix (ECM) (49) and acts as a molecular signal for cells (50, 51). COL6A1 interacts with integrin receptors, specifically integrin α1β1, on the surfaces of oocytes and granulosa cells as the follicles grow (52). This connection is crucial for sending signals from the ECM that activate pathways inside cells (53). When COL6A1 binds to integrins, it activates phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) at the cell membrane (54). This enzyme then phosphorylates PIP2 to form PIP3, the first step in a series of signaling events (55).

Figure 8
Diagram illustrating signaling pathways for follicle development in four sections. A: Shows pathways PR-PM, PM-SW, and SW-SY, highlighting roles in follicle development, enzyme upregulation, and transcription factor activation. B: Details PI3K-AKT signaling, including FOXO3, COL6A1, cell cycle progression, and protein synthesis. C: Illustrates Wnt signaling with receptor interactions, transcription factor activation, and cell proliferation. D: Displays PLB1-glycerophospholipid metabolism, linking phosphatidylcholine to hormone biosynthesis and energy metabolism. Each section involves specific pathways and cellular processes.

Figure 8. (A) Schematic summary figure illustrating the key pathways and their stage-specific activation. (B) The COL6A1-PTEN-PIP3-AKT pathway signals chicken PR follicles to PM. COL6A1 and FOXO3 engage with the ECM via Integrin α1β1, starting the PI3K/AKT cascade. PI3K transforms PIP2 to PIP3, activating AKT. PTEN inhibits mTOR signaling by dephosphorylating PIP3. (C) Wnt/β-catenin-TCF/LEF signaling pathway in PM to SW follicle development. Dvl signal transduction begins when Wnt 1, 3, and 5 bind to Frizzled and LRP5/6 co-receptors. Nuclear translocation and stability are achieved by inhibiting the β-catenin degradation complex (Axin, APC, GSK3β). TCF/LEF transcription factors and β-catenin affect granulosa cell proliferation genes (c-myc, cyclin D1, BIRC5). MAPK, PKC, and PI3K/Akt pathways increase gene expression, proliferation, and DNA replication. (D) PLB1-mediated glycerophospholipid metabolism. For lysophospholipids and free fatty acids, phospholipases break down PC, PE, and PI. Both enlarged follicles and steroidogenesis require membrane remodeling, lipid signaling, and energy consumption.

The transcription factor FOXO3 is inactivated once activated by AKT, which promotes the production of cell cycle inhibitors, including p27Kip1 and RBL2 (56, 57). FOXO3 facilitates the preservation of follicles in their inactive condition. This inhibition is removed upon the inactivation of FOXO3, promoting the proliferation of granulosa cells and the progression of follicular expansion (58, 59). Previous studies have established FOXO3 as a regulator of follicular activation, while PTEN is crucial for modulating AKT activation by inhibiting the conversion of phosphatidylcholine 3,4-bisphosphate (PIP3) to phosphatidylcholine 3,4-bisphosphate (PIP2). This indicates that diminished PTEN expression or activity may lead to premature follicle activation, potentially affecting ovarian reserve maintenance and fertility. PIP3 is a docking site for AKT (protein kinase B), facilitating its phosphorylation and subsequent activation. Activated AKT targets various substrates, influencing cell survival, metabolism, and growth (60). The activation of AKT notably inhibits the TSC1/2 complex, subsequently relieving the suppression of Rheb, a GTPase that activates mTORC1 (mTOR-Raptor complex) (61). The activation of the mTOR pathway enhances protein synthesis and cellular growth by phosphorylating 4EBPs and S6K1/2, which in turn stimulate translation initiation factors, including eIF4E, eIF4B, and ribosomal protein S6 (62). This pathway leads to increased proliferation of follicular cells and growth of oocytes, thereby facilitating the transition to PM follicle growth.

The tumor suppressor PTEN (Phosphatase and TENsin homolog) is a key regulatory checkpoint on this axis (63). It stops PI3K signaling by dephosphorylating PIP3 back to PIP2 (64). This negative regulation ensures that the PI3K-AKT pathway is only activated when needed, maintaining the delicate balance between follicular dormancy and activation. The downregulation of PTEN, a negative regulator of PI3K signaling, provides additional support for the hypothesis of pathway activation during follicle development (65). The temporal changes in PTEN expression in our dataset suggest that it could function as a molecular brake to prevent premature follicle activation, consistent with its known function in mammals (46). The mechanical signals required for follicle activation may be facilitated by type VI collagen and FOXO3 in conjunction with the integrin α1β1 at this stage, suggesting ECM remodeling and integrin signaling (66). When integrins are engaged, PI3K is activated, linking changes in the extracellular matrix to pathways within cells that regulate growth (67). These interactions are essential for the dissolution of the dormancy barrier in PR follicles (68, 69).

Figures 4A, 7A, which combine transcriptome data with KEGG and pathway visualizations, indicate that the COL6A1/FOXO3-PTEN-PIP3-AKT axis functions as part of a more comprehensive network. The PI3K-AKT–mTOR pathway engages multiple signaling networks, including FoxO, NF-κB, and extracellular matrix signaling pathways (70), which together govern essential cellular processes such as apoptosis inhibition, oxidative stress response, and metabolic homeostasis (71, 72). The results highlight the critical importance of the PI3K-AKT–mTOR pathway and extracellular matrix signaling, as mediated by COL6A1 and FOXO3, in the initial phases of chicken follicular development. Transcriptome analysis and pathway enrichment profiling are critical in regulating the ovulation process in chickens, including follicle activation and initial follicular development.

Wnt/β-catenin/TCF-LEF signaling pathway

The development of PM to SW follicles is an essential step in the growth and differentiation of granulosa cells in the chicken ovary. The Wnt/β-catenin/TCF-LEF pathway is activated during this change (73) (Figure 8C). It regulates cell fate, growth, and gene expression (74). This pathway is activated in the present transcriptome profile, indicating its critical role in follicular development and early folliculogenesis. Granulosa cell fate decisions may be influenced by canonical and non-canonical Wnt signaling, as indicated by the upregulation of Wnt receptor expression, which includes Wnt4, Wnt5a, and Wnt11 (7577). Frizzled receptors and the stability of β-catenin drive canonical Wnt signaling, promoting the transcription of target genes linked to proliferation, including cyclin D1, WISP1, and c-myc (78, 79). As a result, the granulosa cells required for follicular wall growth can grow and differentiate more easily (73, 80). Wnt signaling initiates when specific Wnt ligands, including Wnt1, Wnt5, and Wnt11, bind to the Frizzled (Fzd) receptor and its co-receptors located on the cell surface (81). This interaction triggers the activation of the Dishevelled (Dvl) protein, which serves as a crucial hub in the Wnt signal transduction (82). Dvl prevents the phosphorylation and subsequent degradation of β-catenin by blocking the degradation complex of Axin, APC, and GSK-3β (83). The result is that β-catenin accumulates in the cytoplasm and then enters the nucleus (84).

Once the nucleus, β-catenin interacts with TCF/LEF transcription factors, activating a range of target genes that play crucial roles in cell proliferation and differentiation (85). This set of genes includes c-myc, WISP1, and cyclin D (cyclin D) genes, which are necessary for granulosa cell proliferation —a feature of functional maturation and follicle expansion during the transition from PM to SW follicle stage (86). These genes work together to facilitate DNA replication, initiate metabolism, and enable the structural reconfiguration necessary for continuous follicular development (87). In addition, the canonical β-catenin pathway is influenced by noncanonical Wnt signaling pathways such as the Wnt/Ca2+ route and the planar cell polarity (PCP) pathway (88). When Wnt5a is activated, a cascade of events begins, including PLC-mediated calcium signaling, CaMKII activation, and NFAT activation. Finally, it causes gene transcription and DNA replication in granulosa cells. Similarly, the PCP pathway regulates cytoskeletal changes and cellular polarity through RhoA and JNK, which helps organize tissue in growing follicles (89).

The noncanonical Wnt signaling pathways, particularly the Wnt5a-mediated calcium (Ca2+) signaling, are crucial for various cellular processes, including cell migration, polarity, and differentiation (76, 90). The canonical Wnt pathway primarily functions through the stabilization and translocation of β-catenin to the nucleus (91). In contrast, noncanonical Wnt signaling operates independently of β-catenin, activating alternative intracellular signaling pathways, such as the calcium signaling pathway and the planar cell polarity (PCP) pathway (92). Wnt5a, a crucial ligand in the noncanonical pathway, is associated with the regulation of follicular development, especially during the transition from primary to small white follicles in avian species (75, 93). Wnt5a signaling may affect cellular processes, including cortical granule exocytosis, intercellular communication, and the regulation of growth factors that influence follicle maturation (94). The interaction between noncanonical and canonical Wnt pathways is complex (95). Research indicates potential crosstalk, wherein noncanonical signals may enhance or inhibit β-catenin-dependent transcriptional activation of target genes (96, 97). Interactions are essential for maintaining equilibrium among cell proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis throughout follicular development (98). Examining the convergence and divergence of these pathways in regulating follicular dynamics may yield significant insights into reproductive biology and the molecular mechanisms that govern oogenesis in chickens.

This signaling network closely coordinates with other pathways, such as MAPK, TGF-β, and p53, as indicated by the KEGG enrichment analysis pathway maps, which precisely regulate cell cycle progression and maintain cellular homeostasis (99). This interaction ensures that the follicle grows coordinately in response to both internal and external stimuli (99). During the early stages of follicle growth, the Wnt/β-catenin/TCF-LEF signaling axis functions as a molecular switch, facilitating granulosa cell proliferation and the establishment of a structural framework (73, 75). A potential target for altering bird ovarian function could be its regulated activation during the transition from PM to SW follicle stage, emphasizing its critical involvement in folliculogenesis.

PLB1 glycerophospholipid metabolism

Cellular activity increased during the development of ovarian follicles in chickens, from the SW to the SY phases. This activity includes metabolic remodeling, hormone generation, and membrane biosynthesis (100). This study highlights the physiological relevance of the PLB1-mediated glycerophospholipid metabolism pathway at this stage of follicle development by indicating a substantial enrichment of this pathway (Figure 8D). Phosphatidylcholine (PC) and phosphatidylethanolamine (PE) are glycerophospholipids that are involved in membrane structure and are also essential in signaling, cell proliferation, and cell differentiation (101, 102). Using the intermediates monomethyl-phosphatidyl-ethanolamine and dimethyl-phosphatidyl-ethanolamine, phosphatidylcholine (PC) is produced from phosphatidyl-ethanolamine (PE) in this process, which is facilitated by PE N-methyltransferases (103). This conversion is crucial for increasing membrane mass (87) to stimulate follicular cell growth and the ovulation process, as well as for maintaining lipid balance (104) in rapidly proliferating granulosa cells.

The Kennedy pathway is an alternative and supplementary pathway that produces phosphatidylcholine by phosphorylating choline to phosphocholine and then converting it to CDP-choline (105). During the metabolically active SY follicular stage, this branch is critical for cell proliferation, hormone production, and lipid droplet formation (106). As granulosa cells prepare for further expansion and steroidogenic differentiation, an upregulation of CDP-choline and related enzymes suggests an increased demand for membrane lipid production (107). The biosynthesis of phosphatidylethanolamine (PE) from ethanolamine involves using two intermediates, phosphoethanolamine and CDP-ethanolamine, in addition to PC biosynthesis (108). Enzymes linked to the CDP-choline and phosphatidylcholine N-methyltransferase (PEMT) pathways are upregulated during yolk deposition, indicating an increase in metabolism (109). To start vitellogenesis in SY follicles, these enzymes are crucial for lipid droplet production and transport (110, 111). The engagement of these lipid pathways enables the systemic regulation of folliculogenesis, as they meet the demand for estrogen-mediated yolk protein synthesis (112).

This PE branch plays a crucial role in mitochondrial function, apoptosis regulation, and energy metabolism (106), all of which are essential for oocyte maturation and follicle selection (113). CDP-ethanolamine levels significantly impact follicular activity and biosynthetic efficiency (114). The metabolic interactions that facilitate energy production and anabolic development are explained by the relationship between this route and acetaldehyde synthesis, which is linked to glycolysis and pyruvate metabolism (115). Enhanced glycolytic activity may meet the increased ATP demands of granulosa cell development and yolk storage in developing follicles (116, 117). Follicles undergo lipid remodeling and energy integration through the PLB1 glycerophospholipid metabolism pathway during the transition from the SW to the SY development phase. This mechanism relies on the transition from follicle development, membrane biosynthesis, hormone synthesis, and metabolic activity. The relevance of this pathway in establishing early follicular development in chickens is shown by the dynamic regulation of this pathway in our transcriptome studies.

Follicle development is not regulated by a single signaling pathway but rather by a highly intricate and coordinated network involving various molecular mechanisms, such as growth factor signaling (e.g., AKT/mTOR), morphological factors (e.g., Wnt), and metabolic reprogramming (e.g., pyruvate carboxylase metabolism). These pathways interact continuously throughout the maturation process of the follicle, ensuring that both granulosa cells and oocytes receive the necessary molecular processes for proper development. Transcriptomic analyses indicated that key transitions between developmental stages are controlled by the upregulation of specific genes and the selective downregulation of inhibitory factors, including PTEN, GSK3β, and SFRP1/5. These changes reflect the removal of inhibitory checkpoints, thereby enabling the full activation of the corresponding signaling pathways. Such regulation ensures that follicular progression occurs when both external and internal signals are appropriately synchronized. The findings offer crucial insights into the mechanisms of chicken follicle growth and laying a foundation for future advancements in avian reproductive research. The identification of stage-specific pathways linked to follicle development, growth, and selection offers opportunities for developing novel molecular strategies to enhance reproductive efficiency in poultry.

Conclusion

This research presents a detailed molecular characterization of the signaling pathways in developing chicken ovarian follicles. Transcriptomic analysis revealed essential molecular mechanisms and pathways that govern follicular activation, growth, and maturation. The PI3K-Akt/mTOR and Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathways play a crucial role in the initial phases of follicular development by facilitating cell proliferation and survival. As follicles mature, metabolic pathways associated with cellular differentiation, growth, steroidogenesis, lipid metabolism, and extracellular matrix remodeling become increasingly significant, enabling the successful transition from SW to SY follicles. These findings highlight the intricate interplay between signaling and metabolic pathways involved in ovarian follicle development in chickens, providing crucial insights into the molecular mechanisms that regulate reproductive efficiency in avian species.

Data availability statement

The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found in the article/Supplementary material.

Ethics statement

The animal studies were approved by Experimental Ethical Ethics Committee of South China Agricultural University, 2025f235. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. Written informed consent was obtained from the owners for the participation of their animals in this study.

Author contributions

AW: Investigation, Formal analysis, Writing – original draft, Validation, Writing – review & editing, Conceptualization, Software, Methodology. FB: Formal analysis, Data curation, Writing – review & editing. MS: Writing – review & editing, Formal analysis. XZ: Validation, Writing – review & editing, Funding acquisition, Formal analysis, Resources, Visualization, Project administration.

Funding

The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. This study was supported by Research System (Grant Number CARS-41).

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declared that Generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fvets.2025.1676247/full#supplementary-material

References

1. Scanes, CG, Butler, LD, and Kidd, MT. Reproductive management of poultry. Animal Agric. (2020):349–66. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-817052-6.00020-3

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Wadood, AA, Wang, J, Pu, L, Shahzad, Q, Waqas, M, Liu, X, et al. Proteomic analysis identifies potential markers for chicken primary follicle development. Animals. (2021) 11:1108. doi: 10.3390/ani11041108,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Wadood, AA, Pu, L, Shahzad, Q, Waqas, M, Yu, L, Liao, Y, et al. Proteomic analysis identifies potential markers in small white and small yellow follicle development in chickens. Reprod Fertil Dev. (2022) 34:516–25. doi: 10.1071/RD21184,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Du, X, Zhu, Q, Pian, H, Yang, X, Zhao, D, Wu, X, et al. Transcriptome analysis of granulosa cells reveals regulatory mechanisms related to chicken follicle development. Animals. (2023) 14:20. doi: 10.3390/ani14010020,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Zhu, G, Fang, C, Li, J, Mo, C, Wang, Y, and Li, J. Transcriptomic diversification of granulosa cells during follicular development in chicken. Sci Rep. (2019) 9:5462. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-41132-1,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Zhou, S, Ma, Y, Zhao, D, Mi, Y, and Zhang, C. Transcriptome profiling analysis of underlying regulation of growing follicle development in the chicken. Poult Sci. (2020) 99:2861–72. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2019.12.067,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Xu, Z, Liu, Q, Ning, C, Yang, M, Zhu, Q, Li, D, et al. miRNA profiling of chicken follicles during follicular development. Sci Rep. (2024) 14:2212. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-52716-x,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Johnson, A, and Woods, DC. Ovarian dynamics and follicle development In: Reproductive biology and phylogeny of birds, vol. 6. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press (2007). 243–77.

Google Scholar

9. Wadood, AA, and Zhang, X. The omics revolution in understanding chicken reproduction: a comprehensive review. Curr Issues Mol Biol. (2024) 46:6248–66. doi: 10.3390/cimb46060373,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Wadood, AA, and Xiquan, Z. Unraveling the mysteries of chicken proteomics: insights into follicle development and reproduction. J Proteome. (2024) 308:105281. doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2024.105281,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Wang, Y, Chen, Q, Liu, Z, Guo, X, Du, Y, Yuan, Z, et al. Transcriptome analysis on single small yellow follicles reveals that Wnt4 is involved in chicken follicle selection. Front Endocrinol. (2017) 8:317. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2017.00317,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Wu, H, Li, H, Hou, Y, Huang, L, Hu, J, Lu, Y, et al. Differences in egg yolk precursor formation of Guangxi Ma chickens with dissimilar laying rate at the same or various ages. Theriogenology. (2022) 184:13–25. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2022.02.020,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Lim, WA, and Mayer, BJ. Cell signaling: Principles and mechanisms. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press (2024).

Google Scholar

14. El Sabeh, M, Saha, SK, Afrin, S, Islam, MS, and Borahay, MA. Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway in uterine leiomyoma: role in tumor biology and targeting opportunities. Mol Cell Biochem. (2021) 476:3513–36. doi: 10.1007/s11010-021-04174-6,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Roy, S, Gandra, D, Seger, C, Biswas, A, Kushnir, VA, Gleicher, N, et al. Oocyte-derived factors (GDF9 and BMP15) and FSH regulate AMH expression via modulation of H3K27AC in granulosa cells. Endocrinology. (2018) 159:3433–45. doi: 10.1210/en.2018-00609,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Bonnet, A, Servin, B, Mulsant, P, and Mandon-Pepin, B. Spatio-temporal gene expression profiling during in vivo early ovarian folliculogenesis: integrated transcriptomic study and molecular signature of early follicular growth. PLoS One. (2015) 10:e0141482. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0141482,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Gershon, E, and Dekel, N. Newly identified regulators of ovarian folliculogenesis and ovulation. Int J Mol Sci. (2020) 21:4565. doi: 10.3390/ijms21124565,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Wadood, AA, Bordbar, F, and Zhang, X. Integrating omics approaches in livestock biotechnology: innovations in production and reproductive efficiency. Front Anim Sci. (2025) 6:1551244. doi: 10.3389/fanim.2025.1551244

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Urgessa, OE, and Woldesemayat, AA. Omics approaches and technologies for understanding low-high feed efficiency traits in chicken: implication to breeding. Anim Biotechnol. (2023) 34:4147–66. doi: 10.1080/10495398.2023.2187404,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Huang, Y, Luo, W, Luo, X, Wu, X, Li, J, Sun, Y, et al. Comparative analysis among different species reveals that the androgen receptor regulates chicken follicle selection through species-specific genes related to follicle development. Front Genet. (2022) 12:752976. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2021.752976,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Rio, DC, Ares, M, Hannon, GJ, and Nilsen, TW. Purification of RNA using TRIzol (TRI reagent). Cold Spring Harb Protoc. (2010) 2010:pdb. prot5439. doi: 10.1101/pdb.prot5439,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Livak, KJ, and Schmittgen, TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2− ΔΔCT method. Methods. (2001) 25:402–8. doi: 10.1006/meth.2001.1262,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Nie, R, Zheng, X, Zhang, W, Zhang, B, Ling, Y, Zhang, H, et al. Morphological characteristics and transcriptome landscapes of chicken follicles during selective development. Animals. (2022) 12:713. doi: 10.3390/ani12060713,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Ernst, EH, Grøndahl, ML, Grund, S, Hardy, K, Heuck, A, Sunde, L, et al. Dormancy and activation of human oocytes from primordial and primary follicles: molecular clues to oocyte regulation. Hum Reprod. (2017) 32:1684–700. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dex238,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Li, H, and Chian, R-C. (2017) Follicular development and oocyte growth. Chian, Ri-Cheng, Nargund, Geeta, and Huang, Jack Y. J. Development of in vitro maturation for human oocytes: Natural and mild approaches to clinical infertility treatment 37–57. New York: Springer Nature.

Google Scholar

26. Hlokoe, V, Tyasi, T, and Gunya, B. Chicken ovarian follicles morphology and growth differentiation factor 9 gene expression in chicken ovarian follicles. Heliyon. (2022) 8:e08742. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e08742

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Ma, Y, Yao, J, Zhou, S, Mi, Y, Tan, X, and Zhang, C. Enhancing effect of FSH on follicular development through yolk formation and deposition in the low-yield laying chickens. Theriogenology. (2020) 157:418–30. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2020.07.012,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Hu, S, Yang, S, Lu, Y, Deng, Y, Li, L, Zhu, J, et al. Dynamics of the transcriptome and accessible chromatin landscapes during early goose ovarian development. Front Cell Dev Biol. (2020) 8:196. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2020.00196,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Li, D, Ning, C, Zhang, J, Wang, Y, Tang, Q, Kui, H, et al. Dynamic transcriptome and chromatin architecture in granulosa cells during chicken folliculogenesis. Nat Commun. (2022) 13:131. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-27800-9,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Yoon, S-J, Kim, K-H, Chung, H-M, Choi, D-H, Lee, W-S, Cha, K-Y, et al. Gene expression profiling of early follicular development in primordial, primary, and secondary follicles. Fertil Steril. (2006) 85:193–203. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.07.1296,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Fang, X-L, Zhu, X-T, Chen, S-F, Zhang, Z-Q, Zeng, Q-J, Deng, L, et al. Differential gene expression pattern in hypothalamus of chickens during fasting-induced metabolic reprogramming: functions of glucose and lipid metabolism in the feed intake of chickens. Poult Sci. (2014) 93:2841–54. doi: 10.3382/ps.2014-04047,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Berkholtz, CB, Shea, LD, and Woodruff, TK. Extracellular matrix functions in follicle maturation. Semin Reprod Med. (2006) 24:262–9. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-948555

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Liu, L, Xiao, Q, Gilbert, ER, Cui, Z, Zhao, X, Wang, Y, et al. Whole-transcriptome analysis of atrophic ovaries in broody chickens reveals regulatory pathways associated with proliferation and apoptosis. Sci Rep. (2018) 8:7231. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-25103-6,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Qi, G, Gong, Y, Li, Y, Jin, Y, Chi, S, Zhang, W, et al. Insufficient expression of COL6A1 promotes the development of early-onset severe preeclampsia by inhibiting the APJ/AKT signaling pathway. Cell Death Discov. (2025) 11:81. doi: 10.1038/s41420-025-02373-4,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Matsuda-Minehata, F, Inoue, N, Goto, Y, and Manabe, N. The regulation of ovarian granulosa cell death by pro-and anti-apoptotic molecules. J Reprod Dev. (2006) 52:695–705. doi: 10.1262/jrd.18069,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Cuiling, L, Wei, Y, Zhaoyuan, H, and Yixun, L. Granulosa cell proliferation differentiation and its role in follicular development. Chin Sci Bull. (2005) 50:2665–71. doi: 10.1007/BF02899632

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Zhu, H, Ding, Y, Zhu, J, Zhao, L, Su, Y, and Zhao, S. RNA-seq identifies differentially expressed genes involved in csal1 overexpression in granulosa cells of prehierarchical follicles in Chinese Dagu hens. Poult Sci. (2023) 102:102310. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2022.102310,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Zhu, M, Yang, Y, Yang, H, Zhao, Z, Zhang, H, Blair, HT, et al. Whole-genome resequencing of the native sheep provides insights into the microevolution and identifies genes associated with reproduction traits. BMC Genomics. (2023) 24:392. doi: 10.1186/s12864-023-09479-y,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Chap, H. Forty five years with membrane phospholipids, phospholipases and lipid mediators: a historical perspective. Biochimie. (2016) 125:234–49. doi: 10.1016/j.biochi.2016.04.002,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Field, SL, Dasgupta, T, Cummings, M, and Orsi, NM. Cytokines in ovarian folliculogenesis, oocyte maturation and luteinisation. Mol Reprod Dev. (2014) 81:284–314. doi: 10.1002/mrd.22285,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Van Eck, L, Enting, H, Carvalhido, I, Chen, H, and Kwakkel, R. Lipid metabolism and body composition in long-term producing hens. Worlds Poult Sci J. (2023) 79:243–64. doi: 10.1080/00439339.2023.2189206,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Zhu, B, Pardeshi, L, Chen, Y, and Ge, W. Transcriptomic analysis for differentially expressed genes in ovarian follicle activation in the zebrafish. Front Endocrinol. (2018) 9:593. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2018.00593,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Rimon-Dahari, N, Yerushalmi-Heinemann, L, Alyagor, L, and Dekel, N. (2016). “Ovarian Folliculogenesis,” in. Molecular Mechanisms of Cell Differentiation in Gonad Development. (pp. 167–90). Springer Verlag. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-31973-5_7,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Skinner, MK. Regulation of primordial follicle assembly and development. Hum Reprod Update. (2005) 11:461–71. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmi020,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

45. De Felici, M, and Klinger, FG. PI3K/PTEN/AKT signaling pathways in germ cell development and their involvement in germ cell tumors and ovarian dysfunctions. Int J Mol Sci. (2021) 22:9838. doi: 10.3390/ijms22189838,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Maidarti, M, Anderson, RA, and Telfer, EE. Crosstalk between PTEN/PI3K/Akt signalling and DNA damage in the oocyte: implications for primordial follicle activation, oocyte quality and ageing. Cells. (2020) 9:200. doi: 10.3390/cells9010200,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Guo, Z, and Yu, Q. Role of mTOR signaling in female reproduction. Front Endocrinol. (2019) 10:692. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2019.00692,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Yao, J, Ma, Y, Zhou, S, Bao, T, Mi, Y, Zeng, W, et al. Metformin prevents follicular atresia in aging laying chickens through activation of PI3K/AKT and calcium signaling pathways. Oxidative Med Cell Longev. (2020) 2020:1–23. doi: 10.1155/2020/3648040,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Tagliavini, F, Pellegrini, C, Sardone, F, Squarzoni, S, Paulsson, M, Wagener, R, et al. Defective collagen VI α6 chain expression in the skeletal muscle of patients with collagen VI-related myopathies. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA). (2014) 1842:1604–12. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2014.05.033,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Sun, S, Genovese, F, and Karsdal, M. Type VI collagen In: Biochemistry of collagens, laminins and elastin. Amsterdam: Elsevier (2024). 61–73. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-443-15617-5.00004-4

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Di Martino, A, Cescon, M, D’Agostino, C, Schilardi, F, Sabatelli, P, Merlini, L, et al. Collagen VI in the musculoskeletal system. Int J Mol Sci. (2023) 24:5095. doi: 10.3390/ijms24065095,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

52. Ouni, E, Nedbal, V, Da Pian, M, Cao, H, Haas, KT, Peaucelle, A, et al. Proteome-wide and matrisome-specific atlas of the human ovary computes fertility biomarker candidates and open the way for precision oncofertility. Matrix Biol. (2022) 109:91–120. doi: 10.1016/j.matbio.2022.03.005,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

53. Kulus, J, Kulus, M, Kranc, W, Jopek, K, Zdun, M, Józkowiak, M, et al. Transcriptomic profile of new gene markers encoding proteins responsible for structure of porcine ovarian granulosa cells. Biology. (2021) 10:1214. doi: 10.3390/biology10111214,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

54. Elango, J, Hou, C, Bao, B, Wang, S, de Maté Sánchez Val, JE, and Wenhui, W. The molecular interaction of collagen with cell receptors for biological function. Polymers. (2022) 14:876. doi: 10.3390/polym14050876,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

55. Mandal, K. Review of PIP2 in cellular signaling, functions and diseases. Int J Mol Sci. (2020) 21:8342. doi: 10.3390/ijms21218342,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

56. Zhang, X, Tang, N, Hadden, TJ, and Rishi, AK. Akt, FoxO and regulation of apoptosis. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA). (2011) 1813:1978–86. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2011.03.010,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

57. Chen, J, Yusuf, I, Andersen, H-M, and Fruman, DA. FOXO transcription factors cooperate with δEF1 to activate growth suppressive genes in B lymphocytes. J Immunol. (2006) 176:2711–21. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.176.5.2711,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

58. Shen, M, Liu, Z, Li, B, Teng, Y, Zhang, J, Tang, Y, et al. Involvement of FoxO1 in the effects of follicle-stimulating hormone on inhibition of apoptosis in mouse granulosa cells. Cell Death Dis. (2014) 5:400. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2014.400,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

59. Monte, A, Bezerra, M, Menezes, V, Gouveia, B, Barberino, R, Lins, T, et al. Involvement of phosphorylated Akt and FOXO3a in the effects of growth and differentiation Factor-9 (GDF-9) on inhibition of follicular apoptosis and induction of granulosa cell proliferation after in vitro culture of sheep ovarian tissue. Reprod Sci. (2021) 28:2174–85. doi: 10.1007/s43032-020-00409-x,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

60. Fayard, E, Xue, G, Parcellier, A, Bozulic, L, and Hemmings, BA. Protein kinase B (PKB/Akt), a key mediator of the PI3K signaling pathway In: C Rommel, B Vanhaesebroeck, and PK Vogt, editors. Phosphoinositide 3-kinase in health and disease: Volume 1. New York: Springer Nature (2011). 31–56.

Google Scholar

61. Yang, Q, Inoki, K, Kim, E, and Guan, K-L. TSC1/TSC2 and Rheb have different effects on TORC1 and TORC2 activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci. (2006) 103:6811–6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0602282103,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

62. Magnuson, B, Ekim, B, and Fingar, DC. Regulation and function of ribosomal protein S6 kinase (S6K) within mTOR signalling networks. Biochem J. (2012) 441:1–21. doi: 10.1042/BJ20110892,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

63. Song, MS, Salmena, L, and Pandolfi, PP. The functions and regulation of the PTEN tumour suppressor. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. (2012) 13:283–96. doi: 10.1038/nrm3330,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

64. Lee, MF, and Trotman, LC. PTEN: bridging endocytosis and signaling. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. (2020) 10:a036103. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a036103,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

65. Grosbois, J, and Demeestere, I. Dynamics of PI3K and hippo signaling pathways during in vitro human follicle activation. Hum Reprod. (2018) 33:1705–14. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dey250,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

66. Shen, Y, Shen, R, Ge, L, Zhu, Q, and Li, F. Fibrillar type I collagen matrices enhance metastasis/invasion of ovarian epithelial cancer via β1 integrin and PTEN signals. Int J Gynecol Cancer. (2012) 22:1316–24. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0b013e318263ef34,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

67. Boudreau, NJ, and Jones, PL. Extracellular matrix and integrin signalling: the shape of things to come. Biochem J. (1999) 339:481–8.

Google Scholar

68. MeredithJr, JE, Winitz, S, Lewis, JM, Hess, S, Ren, X-D, Renshaw, MW, et al. The regulation of growth and intracellular signaling by integrins. Endocr Rev. (1996) 17:207–20.

Google Scholar

69. Moreno-Layseca, P, and Streuli, CH. Signalling pathways linking integrins with cell cycle progression. Matrix Biol. (2014) 34:144–53. doi: 10.1016/j.matbio.2013.10.011,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

70. Ersahin, T, Tuncbag, N, and Cetin-Atalay, R. The PI3K/AKT/mTOR interactive pathway. Mol BioSyst. (2015) 11:1946–54. doi: 10.1039/C5MB00101C,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

71. Mohseni, AH, Casolaro, V, Bermúdez-Humarán, LG, Keyvani, H, and Taghinezhad-S, S. Modulation of the PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathway by probiotics as a fruitful target for orchestrating the immune response. Gut Microbes. (2021) 13:1886844. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2021.1886844,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

72. Huang, S-p, Zhang, Z-c, Chen, Y, Shang, C-j, Zhu, M, and Li, W-h. Review of Chinese medicine intervention in PI3K/AKT pathway to regulate fibrosis. Medicine. (2025) 104:e42957. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000042957,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

73. Li, L, Shi, X, Shi, Y, and Wang, Z. The signaling pathways involved in ovarian follicle development. Front Physiol. (2021) 12:730196. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2021.730196,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

74. Boyer, A, Goff, AK, and Boerboom, D. WNT signaling in ovarian follicle biology and tumorigenesis. Trends Endocrinol Metabol. (2010) 21:25–32. doi: 10.1016/j.tem.2009.08.005,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

75. Gifford, JH. The role of WNT signaling in adult ovarian folliculogenesis. Reproduction. (2015) 150:R137–48. doi: 10.1530/REP-14-0685,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

76. Sarabia-Sánchez, MA, and Robles-Flores, M. WNT signaling in stem cells: a look into the non-canonical pathway. Stem Cell Rev Rep. (2024) 20:52–66. doi: 10.1007/s12015-023-10610-5,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

77. Abedini, A, Zamberlam, G, Boerboom, D, and Price, CA. Non-canonical WNT5A is a potential regulator of granulosa cell function in cattle. Mol Cell Endocrinol. (2015) 403:39–45. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2015.01.017,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

78. Katoh, M, and Katoh, M. WNT signaling pathway and stem cell signaling network. Clin Cancer Res. (2007) 13:4042–5. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-2316,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

79. Li, F, Chong, Z, and Maiese, K. Winding through the WNT pathway during cellular development and demise. Histol Histopathol. (2006) 21:103–24. doi: 10.14670/HH-21.103,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

80. Dang, W, Ren, Y, Chen, Q, He, M, Kebreab, E, Wang, D, et al. Notch2 regulates the function of bovine follicular granulosa cells via the Wnt2/β-catenin Signaling pathway. Animals. (2024) 14:1001. doi: 10.3390/ani14071001,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

81. Hayat, R, Manzoor, M, and Hussain, A. Wnt signaling pathway: a comprehensive review. Cell Biol Int. (2022) 46:863–77. doi: 10.1002/cbin.11797,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

82. Wang, L, Zhu, R, Wen, Z, Fan, H-JS, Norwood-Jackson, T, Jathan, D, et al. Structural and functional insights into dishevelled-mediated Wnt Signaling. Cells. (2024) 13:1870. doi: 10.3390/cells13221870,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

83. Hino, S-i, Kishida, S, Michiue, T, Fukui, A, Sakamoto, I, Takada, S, et al. Inhibition of the Wnt signaling pathway by Idax, a novel Dvl-binding protein. Mol Cell Biol. (2001) 21:330–42. doi: 10.1128/MCB.21.1.330-342.2001,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

84. Akiyama, T. Wnt/β-catenin signaling. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. (2000) 11:273–82. doi: 10.1016/S1359-6101(00)00011-3,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

85. Doumpas, N, Lampart, F, Robinson, MD, Lentini, A, Nestor, CE, Cantù, C, et al. TCF/LEF dependent and independent transcriptional regulation of Wnt/β-catenin target genes. EMBO J. (2019) 38:e98873. doi: 10.15252/embj.201798873,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

86. Zhang, C-P, Yang, J-L, Zhang, J, Li, L, Huang, L, Ji, S-Y, et al. Notch signaling is involved in ovarian follicle development by regulating granulosa cell proliferation. Endocrinology. (2011) 152:2437–47. doi: 10.1210/en.2010-1182,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

87. Robker, RL, and Richards, JS. Hormone-induced proliferation and differentiation of granulosa cells: a coordinated balance of the cell cycle regulators cyclin D2 and p27Kip1. Mol Endocrinol. (1998) 12:924–40. doi: 10.1210/mend.12.7.0138,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

88. Fang, K. Modulation of the central nervous system immune response and neuroinflammation via Wnt signaling in health and neurodegenerative diseases. Ibrain. (2024) 10:462–76. doi: 10.1002/ibra.12185,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

89. Koca, Y, Collu, GM, and Mlodzik, M. Wnt-frizzled planar cell polarity signaling in the regulation of cell motility. Curr Top Dev Biol. (2022) 150:255–97. doi: 10.1016/bs.ctdb.2022.03.006,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

90. De, A. Wnt/ca 2+ signaling pathway: a brief overview. Acta Biochim Biophys Sin. (2011) 43:745–56. doi: 10.1093/abbs/gmr079

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

91. Cadigan, KM. Wnt–β-catenin signaling. Curr Biol. (2008) 18:R943–7. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2008.08.017,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

92. Kohn, AD, and Moon, RT. Wnt and calcium signaling: β-catenin-independent pathways. Cell Calcium. (2005) 38:439–46. doi: 10.1016/j.ceca.2005.06.022,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

93. Abedini Najafabadi, A. (2015) Elucidation of the biological roles of Wnt5a signaling in follicle development. Available online at: http://hdl.handle.net/1866/13371

Google Scholar

94. Liu, X, Hao, Y, Li, Z, Zhou, J, Zhu, H, Bu, G, et al. Maternal cytokines CXCL12, VEGFA, and WNT5A promote porcine oocyte maturation via MAPK activation and canonical WNT inhibition. Front Cell Dev Biol. (2020) 8:578. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2020.00578,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

95. Widelitz, R. Wnt signaling through canonical and non-canonical pathways: recent progress. Growth Factors. (2005) 23:111–6. doi: 10.1080/08977190500125746,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

96. Zarkou, V, Galaras, A, Giakountis, A, and Hatzis, P. Crosstalk mechanisms between the WNT signaling pathway and long non-coding RNAs. Non-coding RNA Res. (2018) 3:42–53. doi: 10.1016/j.ncrna.2018.04.001,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

97. Ma, B, and Hottiger, MO. Crosstalk between Wnt/β-catenin and NF-κB signaling pathway during inflammation. Front Immunol. (2016) 7:378. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2016.00378,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

98. Quirk, S, Cowan, R, Harman, R, Hu, C-L, and Porter, D. Ovarian follicular growth and atresia: the relationship between cell proliferation and survival. J Anim Sci. (2004) 82:E40–52. doi: 10.2527/2004.8213_supplE40x,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

99. Wang, Z. Regulation of cell cycle progression by growth factor-induced cell signaling. Cells. (2021) 10:3327. doi: 10.3390/cells10123327,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

100. Richards, JS. Maturation of ovarian follicles: actions and interactions of pituitary and ovarian hormones on follicular cell differentiation. Physiol Rev. (1980) 60:51–89. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1980.60.1.51,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

101. Hermansson, M, Hokynar, K, and Somerharju, P. Mechanisms of glycerophospholipid homeostasis in mammalian cells. Prog Lipid Res. (2011) 50:240–57. doi: 10.1016/j.plipres.2011.02.004,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

102. Ali, O, and Szabó, A. Review of eukaryote cellular membrane lipid composition, with special attention to the fatty acids. Int J Mol Sci. (2023) 24:15693. doi: 10.3390/ijms242115693,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

103. Zhang, Y, Jen, FE-C, Edwards, JL, and Jennings, MP. Analysis of bacterial phosphorylcholine-related genes reveals an association between type-specific biosynthesis pathways and biomolecules targeted for phosphorylcholine modification. Microbiol Spectrum. (2023) 11:e01583–23. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.01583-23,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

104. Ng, BS, Shyu, P, Chaw, R, Ling, SY, and Thibault, G. Lipid perturbation compromises UPR-mediated ER homeostasis. bioRxiv. (2018). doi: 10.1101/178947

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

105. Gibellini, F, and Smith, TK. The Kennedy pathway—de novo synthesis of phosphatidylethanolamine and phosphatidylcholine. IUBMB Life. (2010) 62:414–28. doi: 10.1002/iub.337,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

106. Ridgway, ND. The role of phosphatidylcholine and choline metabolites to cell proliferation and survival. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol. (2013) 48:20–38. doi: 10.3109/10409238.2012.735643,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

107. Tayebati, SK, Marucci, G, Santinelli, C, Buccioni, M, and Amenta, F. Choline-containing phospholipids: structure-activity relationships versus therapeutic applications. Curr Med Chem. (2015) 22:4328–40. doi: 10.2174/0929867322666151029104152,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

108. St Germain, M, Iraji, R, and Bakovic, M. Phosphatidylethanolamine homeostasis under conditions of impaired CDP-ethanolamine pathway or phosphatidylserine decarboxylation. Front Nutr. (2023) 9:1094273. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.1094273,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

109. Li, J, Xin, Y, Li, J, Chen, H, and Li, H. Phosphatidylethanolamine N-methyltransferase: from functions to diseases. Aging Dis. (2023) 14:879–91. doi: 10.14336/AD.2022.1025,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

110. Fagone, P, and Jackowski, S. Phosphatidylcholine and the CDP–choline cycle. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA). (2013) 1831:523–32. doi: 10.1016/j.bbalip.2012.09.009,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

111. Aitchison, AJ, Arsenault, DJ, and Ridgway, ND. Nuclear-localized CTP: phosphocholine cytidylyltransferase α regulates phosphatidylcholine synthesis required for lipid droplet biogenesis. Mol Biol Cell. (2015) 26:2927–38. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E15-03-0159,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

112. Ling, J. (2012). Characterization of phosphatidylcholine metabolism in mouse hepatocytes after hepatectomy and in primary human hepatocytes. doi: 10.7939/R3PW82

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

113. Khan, R, Jiang, X, Hameed, U, and Shi, Q. Role of lipid metabolism and signaling in mammalian oocyte maturation, quality, and acquisition of competence. Front Cell Dev Biol. (2021) 9:639704. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2021.639704,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

114. Li, J, Song, M, Wen, H, Zhang, Y, Li, Y, Lyu, L, et al. Gonadal lipidomics profile of an ovoviviparity teleost, black rockfish, during gonadal development. Fish Physiol Biochem. (2021) 47:811–28. doi: 10.1007/s10695-021-00936-7,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

115. Selathurai, A, Kowalski, GM, Burch, ML, Sepulveda, P, Risis, S, Lee-Young, RS, et al. The CDP-ethanolamine pathway regulates skeletal muscle diacylglycerol content and mitochondrial biogenesis without altering insulin sensitivity. Cell Metab. (2015) 21:718–30. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2015.04.001,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

116. Zhang, X, Zhang, W, Wang, Z, Zheng, N, Yuan, F, Li, B, et al. Enhanced glycolysis in granulosa cells promotes the activation of primordial follicles through mTOR signaling. Cell Death Dis. (2022) 13:87. doi: 10.1038/s41419-022-04541-1,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

117. Mo, D, Zeng, Z-H, Sui, X, Li, R, and Yang, Y-H. Role of glucose metabolism and signaling pathways at different stages of ovarian folliculogenesis. Reprod Dev Med. (2024) 8:111–20. doi: 10.1097/RD9.0000000000000079

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: chicken, follicle, transcriptome, signaling, steroidogenesis, PI3K-Akt, Wnt/β-catenin, glycerophospholipid metabolism

Citation: Wadood AA, Bordbar F, Safdar M and Zhang X (2026) Molecular profiling of signaling pathways involved in chicken ovarian follicle development by transcriptome sequencing. Front. Vet. Sci. 12:1676247. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1676247

Received: 30 July 2025; Revised: 01 December 2025; Accepted: 18 December 2025;
Published: 09 January 2026.

Edited by:

Jiuzhou Song, University of Maryland, College Park, United States

Reviewed by:

Feng Li, China West Normal University, China
Dandan Wang, Henan Institute of Science and Technology, China

Copyright © 2026 Wadood, Bordbar, Safdar and Zhang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Xiquan Zhang, eHF6aGFuZ0BzY2F1LmVkdS5jbg==

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.