Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

CLINICAL TRIAL article

Front. Vet. Sci.

Sec. Veterinary Pharmacology and Toxicology

This article is part of the Research TopicInnovations in Pharmacotherapy: Developing Novel Medicines for the Treatment of Animal DiseasesView all articles

Pilot Study Evaluating Tolerability and changes in fecal microbiota associated with novel probiotic administration to Dogs with Diarrhea

Provisionally accepted
Jessi  DoshierJessi Doshier1*Brooke  AndersonBrooke Anderson2Fan  YangFan Yang2Samuel  D. StewartSamuel D. Stewart3Kayla  A. CalapaKayla A. Calapa2Rachel  CooperRachel Cooper1,3Heather  Wilson-RoblesHeather Wilson-Robles1Mallory  EmbreeMallory Embree2Chand  KhannaChand Khanna3
  • 1National Veterinary Associates Inc, Agoura Hills, United States
  • 2Native Microbials, San Diego, United States
  • 3Ethos Discovery, Woburn, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background-Diarrhea is one of the most common reasons for canine veterinary clinic or emergency center visits. Common treatment approaches include dietary modification, antibiotics, and/or probiotics, which are frequently initiated empirically. Antibiotics can have detrimental long-term effects to the gut microbiome and contribute to antimicrobial resistance, prompting a need for alternative therapies. Probiotics are a promising option, however, their strain-specific effects on the canine gut microbiome have been insufficiently characterized in vivo, particularly in dogs with diarrhea. Hypothesis/Objectives-To evaluate tolerability and changes in fecal microbiota in dogs with diarrhea during the administration of a novel, advanced microbiome-derived probiotic (AMP) consisting of live Peptacetobacter hiranonis, Megamonas funiformis, and Enterococcus faecium, strains of which were all originally isolated from the feces of a healthy dog. Animals-This single-arm, prospective observational pilot study consisted of eleven client-owned adult dogs of various breeds presenting for chronic diarrhea (>5 days) with a Purina Fecal Score (PFS) between 4 and 7. Methods-Tolerability of the AMP was assessed through serial clinical examinations and comparison of PFS to baseline. Dogs were classified as responders if their PFS improved to <4 by day 7, and as non-responders otherwise. Fecal samples collected at baseline, day 7, and day 56 of AMP administration underwent Illumina amplicon next-generation sequencing (NGS) of 16S rRNA gene fragments (V4 region) to assess the fecal microbiome composition and diversity in each patient. Results-No adverse events were noted in any dogs receiving the AMP. Clinical improvement in diarrhea was noted in eight of eleven dogs after administration of the AMP. Increases in fecal microbiome alpha-diversity were observed after one week of AMP administration for six out of seven long-term participants. Conclusions and clinical importance-This pilot study indicates that the AMP was well tolerated in dogs with diarrhea, with dogs maintaining or improving clinical appearance during administration. These preliminary findings justify larger controlled studies to evaluate AMP efficacy and to explore associations between treatment, fecal microbiome changes, and clinical response.

Keywords: chronic, Diarrhea, dog, microbiome, microbiota, probiotic, tolerability

Received: 08 Oct 2025; Accepted: 03 Dec 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Doshier, Anderson, Yang, Stewart, Calapa, Cooper, Wilson-Robles, Embree and Khanna. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Jessi Doshier

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.