Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Vet. Sci., 15 January 2026

Sec. Veterinary Imaging

Volume 12 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2025.1721000

This article is part of the Research TopicRecent Advances in the Management of Cardiac Disease in Companion AnimalsView all 11 articles

Integrative anatomical and two-dimensional ultrasonographic assessment of the heart in Shetland ponies

Jorge Isidoro Matos
Jorge Isidoro Matos1*Lidia Pitti
Lidia Pitti2*María Parra-QuijanoMaría Parra-Quijano3Alberto ArencibiaAlberto Arencibia4Gregorio RamírezGregorio Ramírez5María Luisa Díaz-BertranaMaría Luisa Díaz-Bertrana2
  • 1Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria, Instituto de Investigación en Ciencias Biomédicas y de la Salud (IUIBS), Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain
  • 2Facultad de Veterinaria, Hospital Clínico Veterinario, Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain
  • 3Facultad de Veterinaria, Hospital Clínico Veterinario, Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, Spain
  • 4Facultad de Veterinaria, Departamento de Morfología, Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain
  • 5Departamento de Anatomía y Anatomía Patológica, Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, Spain

Objective: The purpose of this study was to characterize the normal anatomy of the Shetland pony heart through an integrative approach combining two-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography and anatomical dissection.

Methods: Transthoracic echocardiographic examinations were performed in 19 clinically healthy Shetland ponies, obtaining standardized longitudinal and cross-sectional two-dimensional views of the heart. These images were used to describe the main echocardiographic windows and to document the visualization of relevant cardiac structures. In parallel, four Shetland pony hearts were dissected and sectioned, allowing an illustrative correspondence between anatomical landmarks and representative echocardiographic views, thereby facilitating a more precise interpretation of the observed structures. Furthermore, basic two-dimensional echocardiographic measurements were determined, including diameters of key cardiovascular chambers and vessels.

Results: Nineteen Shetland ponies (median age 6.8 years; median body weight 136.9 kg) were evaluated. Anatomical analysis allowed identification of the main cardiac structures and their topographic relationships, which showed illustrative correspondence with the two-dimensional echocardiographic views. The largest measurements were the left ventricular diastolic diameter (5.4 cm) and the left atrial diastolic diameter (4.2 cm), while the smallest was the right ventricular free wall in diastole (1.2 cm). Intra-observer variability was low (ICC = 0.94; CV = 3.2%), confirming high measurement repeatability.

Conclusion: Overall, the data obtained provide an adequate anatomical reference and offer relevant insights to support the interpretation of transthoracic two-dimensional echocardiographic studies in Shetland ponies.

1 Introduction

The Shetland pony is one of the smallest equine breeds, originating from the Shetland Islands in northern Scotland and considered a modern native pony of Great Britain (1). Adults typically measure 90–110 cm at the withers and weigh between 100 and 300 kg. Despite their reduced stature, Shetland ponies are notably robust, with compact bodies, short but strong limbs, and dense coats well adapted to harsh climates (2, 3).

The morphological characteristics of the Shetland pony have attracted considerable interest, particularly the anatomical adaptations associated with its markedly reduced body size (4, 5). This breed is characterized by a proportionally large head, relatively short but sturdy limbs, and broad thoracic and abdominal cavities that accommodate well-developed organ systems (6, 7). Anatomical differences are especially evident in the skull, where paranasal sinuses and sinonasal communications differ substantially from those of standard-sized horses (8). Cranial proportions are also distinctive, with Shetland ponies exhibiting a comparatively larger cranium and smaller muzzle than larger horse breeds and donkeys (9). The vertebral column shows a particular configuration, with a greater tendency toward thoracoization and lumbarization, together with increased variability in the number of vertebrae and rib pairs. Furthermore, the limb skeleton is formed by relatively short yet compact and resistant bones, contributing to the strength and endurance that distinguish the breed in relation to its body size (10).

From a cardiovascular perspective, ponies, including Shetlands, generally present relatively smaller cardiac chambers but proportionally thicker ventricular walls compared to larger horses, consistent with their compact conformation and higher relative cardiac workload (7, 11). Echocardiography has been validated in this breed, and several studies have highlighted important breed-specific cardiovascular features. For example, Shetland ponies with metabolic disorders exhibit increased echocardiographic values of left ventricular wall thickness compared to healthy standard horses (11, 12). Non-uniform patterns of blood pressure and heart rate regulation have also been reported, alongside associations between heightened sympathetic tone, reduced parasympathetic tone, and ventricular wall thickening (13). These findings suggest that Shetland ponies may exhibit slightly elevated blood pressure, predisposing them to left ventricular hypertrophy, a condition strongly linked to the high prevalence of obesity within this breed (14, 15). Furthermore, congenital cardiovascular defects have been documented, including ventricular septal defects, absence of the pulmonary valve, and anomalous pulmonary artery development, as confirmed through echocardiography and post-mortem anatomical dissection (16).

In addition, a recent study in horses and ponies of various breeds reported echocardiographic reference values using allometric regression equations based on body weight and thoracic circumference. These results demonstrated a direct relationship between echocardiographic parameters and body size, underscoring the importance of breed-specific reference data to improve the diagnostic accuracy and prognosis of equine heart disease (17).

Although functional cardiovascular adaptations in Shetland ponies have been documented, this study was intentionally limited to structural assessment. Functional echocardiographic parameters, such as systolic or diastolic function indices, were excluded due to their reliance on advanced imaging techniques and specific hemodynamic measurements. The primary aim was to establish a detailed anatomical and echocardiographic reference based on two-dimensional views. Given the breed’s unique cardiovascular morphology, using reference values from larger horse breeds may lead to diagnostic inaccuracies. Breed-specific data are therefore essential to ensure reliable echocardiographic assessment.

Previous studies have typically addressed either anatomical or echocardiographic aspects in isolation, with limited efforts to visually correlate both modalities. This study addresses that gap by providing a combined anatomical–echocardiographic reference specific to the Shetland pony, without subject-specific matching. This approach is intended to support both clinical interpretation and veterinary education by offering illustrative visual comparisons between anatomical structures and standard echocardiographic views.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Animals subjected to echocardiography

This was an exploratory, descriptive study aimed at generating baseline anatomical and echocardiographic reference information for the Shetland pony. A prospective study was conducted between September 2023 and July 2025, involving a total of 19 Shetland ponies from the island of Gran Canaria (Spain). Various descriptive parameters were recorded for each animal, including age (years and months), body weight (kg), body condition score (BCS: 1–9) (18), reproductive status (sterilized or not), heart rate (beats per minute), and height at the withers (cm). Weight was estimated using costal arch circumference (cm) and total body length (cm) following the formula: Weight = (CA2 × TL) / 1900, in accordance with previously established protocols (19). Additional data collected included geographic location, history of previous illnesses, and any medical treatments administered. Echocardiographic examinations were performed at the animals’ place of habitation without relocating them for the procedure.

No formal sample size calculation was performed, as the number of animals included was based on availability and adherence to the inclusion criteria. Animals were included in the study if they met the following criteria: Pure Shetland breed, body weight under 300 kg, minimum age of 1 year, withers height below 110 cm, no history of cardiopulmonary disease, no current pharmacological treatment, no sedation or anesthesia during the ultrasound, compliance with regional regulations on deworming, vaccination, and animal identification, as established by the Autonomous Community of the Canary Islands (Spain). To further ensure the health status of the animals, all individuals underwent a targeted physical examination performed by veterinarians with extensive expertise in equine medicine (M. L. D.-B., L. P.). The clinical evaluation included assessment of heart rate, respiratory rate, thoracic auscultation, mucous membrane color, and capillary refill time. Additionally, all animals underwent transthoracic two-dimensional echocardiographic screening. Only ponies with no relevant clinical signs and no detectable structural or functional cardiac abnormalities were included in the study.

2.2 Echocardiographic evaluation

All 19 ponies underwent a standardized transthoracic echocardiographic examination. Static images and cine loops were acquired in two-dimensional mode using the same ultrasound system and a 1.2–4.5 MHz phased-array transducer (Vivid iq, General Electric, Boston, MA, USA). Ponies were examined while standing in a relaxed position. Standardized longitudinal and transverse right and left parasternal views were acquired following the protocol adapted for equine described by Koenig et al. (20). For the right parasternal approach, the transducer was positioned between the third and fourth intercostal spaces to obtain standard right-sided long- and short-axis views. For the left apical approach, the most caudoventral region of the left hemithorax was explored, specifically between the fifth and sixth intercostal spaces, as close as possible to the cardiac apex, which allowed acquisition of left-sided views in all animals.

The right-sided transverse sections included views at the levels of the: left ventricle, mitral valve, cardiac base, pulmonary trunk bifurcation. The right-sided longitudinal sections included: four-chamber view and five-chamber view. The left-sided longitudinal views included: apical four-chamber view and apical five-chamber view. All examinations were conducted with animals fully conscious, without anesthetic or sedative administration. For each parameter, three consecutive cardiac cycles in sinus rhythm were recorded, obtaining the arithmetic mean. All echocardiographic evaluations were performed by the same investigator (J. I. M).

The following two-dimensional measurements were obtained following established protocols (17): Interventricular septum diameter in systole and diastole (IVSs, IVSd) from a right longitudinal four-chamber view, Left atrial diameter in systole and diastole (LAs, LAd) from a right transverse view at the cardiac base, Right atrial diameter in systole and diastole (RAs, RAd) from a left longitudinal four-chamber view, Left ventricular cavity diameter in systole and diastole (LVs, LVd) from a right transverse view at the left ventricle level, Right ventricular cavity diameter in systole and diastole (RVs, RVd) from a left longitudinal four-chamber view, Left ventricular free wall thickness in systole and diastole (LVFWs, LVFWd) from a right longitudinal four-chamber view, Right ventricular free wall thickness in systole and diastole (RVFWs, RVFWd) from a right longitudinal four-chamber view, Tricuspid and mitral valve annular diameters (TVD, MVD) from a left longitudinal four-chamber view, Pulmonary and aortic valve diameters (PVD, AoVD) from a right transverse view at the level of the pulmonary trunk bifurcation.

In the absence of electrocardiographic tracing, end-diastolic and end-systolic frames were identified using consistent echocardiographic landmarks. When the atrioventricular valves (mitral or tricuspid) were visible, end-diastole was defined as the frame just before valve closure, corresponding to maximal ventricular internal dimension. In views where these valves were not present, end-diastole was identified as the frame immediately before aortic or pulmonary valve opening. End-systole was defined as the frame corresponding to minimal left ventricular cavity size, typically following semilunar valve closure.

2.3 Anatomical study

A total of 4 frozen cardiac samples from Shetland pony specimens were available for cardiac dissection and macroscopic analysis. Dissections were carried out at the Department of Veterinary Anatomy and Embryology (Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Murcia). The four cardiac samples analyzed did not correspond to any of the 19 animals subjected to echocardiography. Specifically, the anatomical samples were obtained from animals that were euthanized due to traumatic and/or joint lesions that prevented an acceptable quality of life. All dissected animals were adults with ages and body weights comparable to those of the echocardiographic group. This comparison was made descriptively, without formal statistical analysis, due to the limited number of anatomical specimens.

Anatomical reference texts (21, 22), in addition to previous dissection protocols (23), were consulted to guide macroscopic measurements and anatomical sectioning. External cardiovascular morphology was assessed, including the: Atrial surface, Auricular surface, dorsal surface, cranial and caudal views (Figure 1).

Figure 1
Five labeled images of a heart from different angles (A to E) showing anatomical features. Labels include structures like the pulmonary vein (PV), left atrium (LAu), right atrium (RAu), right ventricle (RV), and left ventricle (LV). Additional labels include the coronary sinus (CS), atrial and ventricular features, and identified vessels like the ascending aorta (AAo) and pulmonary trunk (PT). Each label denotes specific heart anatomy for educational purposes.

Figure 1. Anatomical dissections of the heart of the Shetland pony. (A) Atrial surface; (B) Auricular surface; (C) Dorsal surface; (D) Cranial view; (E) Caudal view. TAo (Thoracic aorta), CrVC (Cranial vena cava), BT (Brachiocephalic trunk), PV (Pulmonary veins), LAu (Left auricle), CaVC (Caudal vena cava), CS (Coronary sulcus), RAu (Right auricle), LV (Left ventricle), RV (Right ventricle), SIS (Subsinuosal interventricular sulcus), HA (Heart apex), PT (Pulmonary trunk), AAo (Ascending aorta), PIS (Paraconal interventricular sulcus), AoAr (Aortic arch), and ArL (Arteriosus ligament).

The anatomical preparations were thawed and dissected without using any chemical fixatives or preservation agents. This anatomical samples did not correspond to the individuals examined by echocardiography, therefore, comparisons were conceptual. Transverse sections were performed to replicate echocardiographic cross-sections at the levels of: Pulmonary artery bifurcation, cardiac base, mitral valve and left ventricle. Longitudinal anatomical sections were also obtained with and without including the left ventricular outflow tract and the aortic valve.

2.4 Statistical analysis

All continuous variables were assessed for normality using the Shapiro–Wilk test. Since all parameters showed non-normal distribution, results are expressed as median (minimum–maximum). Intra-observer reproducibility was determined from two independent measurements per animal. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated, together with their 95% confidence intervals. Additionally, Bland–Altman plots were generated to estimate the mean bias and limits of agreement (mean difference ± 1.96·SD). As complementary indices of measurement error, the intra-observer coefficient of variation (CV%) was also calculated. All statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics, version 25 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA), with the level of significance set at p < 0.05.

2.5 Ethical considerations

All animal owners were informed and provided signed consent for participation in the study. This included authorization for the echocardiographic examinations as well as for the use of cardiac samples obtained post-mortem from animals subjected to necropsy. The study was observational and non-invasive, and its evaluation included ethical considerations and legal aspects regarding animal protection and welfare, carried out in accordance with current Spanish and European legislation on animal protection.

3 Results

Table 1 shows descriptive data from the group of 19 individuals, including 4 intact males, 4 castrated males, and 11 females. The data are presented as median, minimum, and maximum, or percentages for the different variables collected. Likewise, the external anatomical structures and their topographic location in Shetland pony hearts are shown in Figure 1. On the other hand, Figures 29 show the echocardiographic views and their respective reference anatomical images.

Table 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Representation of the most important clinical findings of the Shetland ponies analyzed (N = 19).

Figure 2
Cross-sectional images of a human heart. Panel A shows a labeled anatomical section with structures such as the aortic valve (AAoV) and pulmonary trunk (PT). Panel B displays an ultrasound image with labeled features including the right atrium (RAt) and ascending aorta (AAo). Each feature is marked with small yellow text.

Figure 2. (A) Dorsal view of a transverse anatomical section of the heart of the Shetland pony at the right and left atrial level, illustrating the structures observed in the corresponding echocardiographic view. (B) Two-dimensional image for the right parasternal access, transverse view optimized for the view of the pulmonary trunk bifurcation. RAt (Right atrium), RAu (Right auricle), AC (Angular cuspid), CaCV (Caudal vena cava), ArL (Arteriosus ligament), PT (Pulmonary trunk), PTV (Pulmonary trunk valve), AoV (Aortic valve), AAo (Ascending aorta), LAt (Left atrium), LAu (Left auricle), CS (Coronary sulcus), RVM (Right ventricular muscle), RV (Right ventricle), RAtvV (Right atrioventricular valve), RPA (Right pulmonary artery), LPA (Left pulmonary artery), and TP (Tricuspid papillary).

Figure 3
Cross-sectional views of a human heart, labeled with anatomical structures. Image A shows a dissected heart with visible parts like the right atrium, valve, and left ventricle. Image B displays a corresponding ultrasound image with the same structures, including the pulmonary valve and right ventricle, labeled for comparison.

Figure 3. (A) Dorsal view of a transverse anatomical section of the heart of the Shetland pony at the aortic valve level, illustrating the structures observed in the corresponding echocardiographic view. (B) Two-dimensional image for the right parasternal access, transverse view at the heart base level. RAu (Right auricle), RAtvV (Right atrioventricular valve), AoV (Aortic valve), LAtvV (Left atrioventricular valve), LAu (Left auricle), RSV (Right semilunar valvule), SSV (Septal semilunar valvule), LSV (Left semilunar valve), PTV (Pulmonary trunk valve), RV (Right ventricle), LV (Left ventricle), AAo (Ascending aorta), RVM (Right ventricular muscle), RAt (Right atrium), LAt (Left atrium), PV (Pulmonary veins), LAAp (Left atrial appendage), and FP (Fibrous pericardium).

Figure 4
Cross-section images of a heart. Image A shows a detailed anatomical dissection with labels such as RAtvV, ParC, RV, and others marking various parts of the heart structure. Image B is an echocardiogram with annotations corresponding to heart sections like RV, LV, IVS, and others. Both images provide a detailed comparison of anatomical and ultrasound heart views.

Figure 4. (A) Dorsal view of a transverse anatomical section of the heart of the Shetland pony at the mitral valve level, illustrating the structures observed in the corresponding echocardiographic view. (B) Two-dimensional image for the right parasternal access, transverse view at the mitral valve level. RAtvV (Right atrioventricular valve), SepmT (Septomarginal trabecula), RVM (Right ventricular muscle), PM (Papillary muscle), IVS (Interventricular septum), ParC (Parietal cuspid), AngC (Angular cuspid), RV (Right ventricle), LV (Left ventricle), SepC (Septal cuspid), TC (Tendinous cord), LAtvV (Left atrioventricular valve), LVM (Left ventricular muscle), SepV (Septal valvule), ParV (Parietal valvule), and FP (Fibrous pericardium).

Figure 5
Cross-sectional images of the heart are displayed. Panel A shows a detailed anatomical dissection highlighting parts such as the right ventricular myocardium, interventricular septum, left ventricle, and papillary muscles. Panel B depicts a correlative ultrasound image identifying similar structures, including the left ventricular myocardium and epicardial fat. Both images are labeled with medical abbreviations for clarity.

Figure 5. (A) Dorsal view of a transverse anatomical section of the heart of the Shetland pony at the papillary muscles level, illustrating the structures observed in the corresponding echocardiographic view. (B) Two-dimensional image for the right parasternal access, short axis view at the left papillary muscles level. RVM (Right ventricular muscle), PM (Papillary muscle), RV (Right ventricle), IVS (interventricular septum), LV (Left ventricle), TC (Tendinous cord), LVM (Left ventricular muscle), and FP (Fibrous pericardium).

Figure 6
(A) A dissected heart showing internal structures with labels such as RV, LV, and IVS. Ventral and dorsal, right and left orientation arrows are present. (B) Ultrasound image displaying cardiac structures labeled with terms like RV, LV, and IVS. (C) Another ultrasound image showing labeled heart regions including RV and LV.

Figure 6. (A) Longitudinal anatomical section of the heart of the Shetland pony, illustrating the structures observed in the corresponding echocardiographic views. (B) Two-dimensional image for the right parasternal longitudinal 4-chamber view by the time of systole. (C) Two-dimensional image for the right parasternal longitudinal 4-chamber view by the time of diastole. TC (Tendinous cord), ParC (Parietal cuspid), AngC (Angular cuspid), RAtvV (Right atrioventricular valve), SepmT (Septomarginal trabecula), PM (Papillary muscle), RVM (Right ventricular muscle), RV (Right ventricle), SepC (Septal cuspid), RA (Right atrium), HA (Heart apex), IVS (Interventricular septum), RM (Right marginal), LV (Left ventricle), LVM (Left ventricular muscle), LAt (Left atrium), AAo (Ascending aorta), PT (Pulmonary trunk), LAtvV (Left atrioventricular valve), FP (Fibrous pericardium), IAS (Interatrial septum), PV (Pulmonary veins), and LA (Left atrium).

Figure 7
A split image with a labeled anatomical dissection of a heart on the top and an ultrasound image of the heart on the bottom. Panel A shows detailed labels of various heart structures, including ventricles, atria, and valves. Panel B presents the heart's internal structures as seen in an ultrasound, also labeled with annotations. The focus in both panels is on the heart's anatomy and orientation, arranged for educational purposes.

Figure 7. (A) Longitudinal anatomical section of the heart of the Shetland pony, illustrating the structures observed in the corresponding echocardiographic view. (B) Two-dimensional image for the longitudinal left parasternal access, four chamber apical view. HA (Heart apex), RVM (Right ventricular muscle), SepmT (Septomarginal trabecula), TC (Tendinous cord), PM (Papillary muscle), RV (Right ventricle), ParC (Parietal cuspid), AngC (Angular cuspid), RA (Right atrium), RAtvV (Right atrioventricular valve), SepC (Septal cuspid), IVS (Interventricular septum), LV (Left ventricle), LVM (Left ventricular muscle), LAtvV (Left atrioventricular valve), LAt (Left atrium), pulmonary trunk (PT), ascending aorta (AAo), IAS (Interatrial septum), PV (Pulmonary veins), and LAM (Left atrium muscle).

Figure 8
Panel A shows a cross-section of a dissected heart with labeled anatomical parts, such as the right ventricle and atrioventricular valve. Panel B presents an ultrasound image of the heart in a longitudinal view with labeled chambers and valves. Panel C depicts another ultrasound view of the heart with similar anatomical labels. The labels in all images are in yellow, and arrows indicate the direction towards the right and left.

Figure 8. (A) Longitudinal anatomical section of the heart of the Shetland pony including the left ventricular outflow tract and the aortic valve, illustrating the structures observed in the corresponding echocardiographic views. (B) Two-dimensional image for the right parasternal longitudinal 5-chamber view by the time of systole. (C) Two-dimensional image for the right parasternal longitudinal 5-chamber view by the time of diastole. HA (Heart apex), RVM (Right ventricular muscle), SepmT (Septomarginal trabecula), TC (Tendinous cord), PM (Papillary muscle), RV (Right ventricle), ParC (Parietal cuspid), AngC (Angular cuspid), RA (Right atrium), RAtvV (Right atrioventricular valve), SepC (Septal cuspid), IVS (Interventricular septum), LV (Left ventricle), LVM (Left ventricular muscle), LAtvV (Left atrioventricular valve), LAt (Left atrium), AoV (Aortic valve), AAo (Ascending aorta), FP (Frontal plane), LAM (Left atrium muscle), and MA (Mitral valve).

Figure 9
Cross-section of a heart labeled with anatomical terms in yellow. Panel A shows a detailed heart dissection, highlighting structures like septum and ventricles. Panel B displays a black-and-white ultrasound with corresponding labels, indicating right-left orientation. Arrows show dorsal and ventral directions.

Figure 9. (A) Longitudinal anatomical section of the heart of the Shetland pony including the left ventricular outflow tract and the aortic valve, illustrating the structures observed in the corresponding echocardiographic view. (B) Two-dimensional image for the longitudinal left parasternal access, five chamber apical view. The heart apex (HA), right ventricle muscle (RVM), septomarginal trabecula (SepmT), right ventricle (RV), papillary muscle (PM), interventricular septum (IVS), tendinous cord (TC), parietal cuspid (ParC), angular cuspid (AngC), septal cuspid (SepC), right atrioventricular valve (RAtvV), right atrium (RAt), ascending aorta (AAo), left ventricle (LV), left atrium (LAt), left atrioventricular valve (LAtvV), left ventricle muscle (LVM), fibrous pericardium (FP), aortic valve (AoV), pulmonary veins (PV), interventricular septum (IAS), and left auricle mean diameter (LAM).

The external morphological analysis enabled the study of the main anatomical structures, and was shown in Figure 1. In the atrial surface (view A), the thoracic aorta (TAo), cranial vena cava (CrVC), brachiocephalic trunk (BT), pulmonary veins (PV), left auricle (LAu), caudal vena cava (CaVC), coronary sulcus (CS), right auricle (RAu), left ventricle (LV), right ventricle (RV), subsinuosal interventricular sulcus (SIS), and heart apex (HA) were observed. In the auricular surface (view B), the brachiocephalic trunk (BT), thoracic aorta (TAo), pulmonary trunk (PT), ascending aorta (AAo), caudal vena cava (CaVC), left auricle (LAu), coronary sulcus (CS), angular cuspid (AC), right auricle (RAu), left ventricle (LV), right ventricle (RV), paraconal interventricular sulcus (PIS), and heart apex (HA) could be distinguished. In the dorsal surface (view C), the thoracic aorta (TAo), aortic arch (AoAr), brachiocephalic trunk (BT), ascending aorta (AAo), right auricle (RAu), pulmonary veins (PV), pulmonary trunk (PT), coronary sulcus (CS), and left auricle (LAu) were identified. In the cranial aspect (view D), the thoracic aorta (TAo), brachiocephalic trunk (BT), ascending aorta (AAo), caudal vena cava (CaVC), left auricle (LAu), coronary sulcus (CS), right auricle (RAu), pulmonary trunk (PT), left ventricle (LV), right ventricle (RV), paraconal interventricular sulcus (PIS), and heart apex (HA) were visible. In the caudal aspect (view E), the thoracic aorta (TAo), caudal vena cava (CaVC), arteriosus ligament (ArL), pulmonary trunk (PT), aortic arch (AoAr), pulmonary veins (PV), left auricle (LAu), coronary sulcus (CS), left ventricle (LV), and heart apex (HA) were reported.

In the Figure 2, several anatomical structures can be observed: ascending aorta (Aao), aortic valve (AAoV), angular cuspid (AC), arteriosus ligament (ArL), caudal cava vein (CaCV), coronary sulcus (CS), left atrium (LAt), left auricle (LAu), pulmonary trunk (PT), pulmonary valve (PTV), right atrium (RAt), right auricle (RAu), right atrioventricular valve (RAtvV), right ventricle (RV), right ventricle muscle (RVM), right pulmonary artery (RPA), and the left pulmonary artery (LPA).

In Figure 3, the following anatomical components are identified: the ascending aorta (AAo), aortic valve (AoV), right auricle (RAu), right atrioventricular valve (RAtvV), right ventricle (RV), right ventricular muscle (RVM), pulmonary trunk valve (PTV), left ventricle (LV), left auricle (LAu), left atrium (LAt), left atrioventricular valve (LAtvV), pulmonary veins (PV), left atrial appendage (LAAp), fibrous pericardium (FP), right semilunar valve (RSV), septal semilunar valvule (SSV), and left semilunar valve (LSV).

In Figure 4, the following anatomical structures are identified: right atrioventricular valve (RAtvV), septomarginal trabecula (SepmT), right ventricular muscle (RVM), papillary muscle (PM), interventricular septum (IVS), right ventricle (RV), angular cuspid (AngC), parietal cuspid (ParC), left ventricle (LV), septal cuspid (SepC), tendinous cord (TC), left atrioventricular valve (LAtvV), left ventricular muscle (LVM), fibrous pericardium (FP), septal valve (SepV), and parietal valve (ParV).

In Figure 5, the following anatomical structures are identified: right ventricular muscle (RVM), papillary muscle (PM), right ventricle (RV), interventricular septum (IVS), left ventricle (LV), tendinous cord (TC), left ventricular muscle (LVM), and fibrous pericardium (FP).

In Figure 6, the following anatomical structures could be observed: tendinous cord (TC), parietal cuspid (ParC), angular cuspid (AngC), right atrioventricular valve (RAtvV), septomarginal trabecula (SepmT), right ventricle muscle (RVM), papillary muscle (PM), right ventricle (RV), septal cuspid (SepC), right atrium (RAt), heart apex (HA), interventricular septum (IVS), pulmonary trunk (PT), ascending aorta (AAo), right marginal (RM), left ventricle (LV), left atrium (LAt), left atrioventricular valve (LAtvV), left ventricle muscle (LVM), fibrous pericardium (FP), interventricular septum (IAS), pulmonary veins (PV), right atrium (RA), and left atrium (LA).

In Figure 7, several anatomical structures were shown: heart apex (HA), right ventricle muscle (RVM), septomarginal trabecula (SepmT), tendinous cord (TC), papillary muscle (PM), right ventricle (RV), parietal cuspid (ParC), angular cuspid (AngC), right atrium (RAt), right atrioventricular valve (RAtvV), septal cuspid (SepC), interventricular septum (IVS), pulmonary trunk (PT), ascending aorta (AAo), left ventricle (LV), left atrium (LAt), left atrioventricular valve (LAtvV), left ventricle muscle (LVM), right auricle mean diameter (RAMD), interventricular septum (IAS), pulmonary veins (PV), and left auricle mean diameter (LAM).

In Figure 8, several anatomical structures were reported: tendinous cord (TC), parietal cuspid (ParC), angular cuspid (AngC), right atrioventricular valve (RAtvV), septomarginal trabecula (SepmT), right ventricle muscle (RVM), papillary muscle (PM), right ventricle (RV), septal cuspid (SepC), right atrium (RAt), heart apex (HA), interventricular septum (IVS), aortic valve (AoV), ascending aorta (AAo), left ventricle (LV), left atrium (LAt), left atrioventricular valve (LAtvV), left ventricle muscle (LVM), fibrous pericardium (FP), left auricle mean diameter (LAM), mitral valve (MV), and pulmonary trunk (PT).

In Figure 9, several anatomical structures were observed: heart apex (HA), right ventricle muscle (RVM), septomarginal trabecula (SepmT), right ventricle (RV), papillary muscle (PM), interventricular septum (IVS), tendinous cord (TC), parietal cuspid (ParC), angular cuspid (AngC), septal cuspid (SepC), right atrioventricular valve (RAtvV), right atrium (RAt), ascending aorta (AAo), left ventricle (LV), left atrium (LAt), left atrioventricular valve (LAtvV), left ventricle muscle (LVM), fibrous pericardium (FP), aortic valve (AoV), pulmonary veins (PV), interventricular septum (IAS), and left auricle mean diameter (LAM).

Table 2 summarizes the two-dimensional echocardiographic measurements of the evaluated cardiac structures (N = 19), reported as median (minimum–maximum). The two-dimensional measurements showed that the left ventricular diastolic diameter (LVd) was the highest recorded value (5.4 cm), followed by the left atrial diastolic diameter (LAd) at 4.2 cm, and the mitral valve diameter (MVD) at 4.5 cm. The systolic thickness of the interventricular septum (IVSs) was 2.3 cm, while the systolic left ventricular free wall (LVFWs) measured 2.7 cm. The smallest dimensions corresponded to the diastolic thickness of the right ventricular free wall (RVFWd) at 1.2 cm and the right ventricular systolic diameter (RVs) at 1.5 cm.

Table 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Representation of the median, minimum, and maximum values of the echocardiographic measurements performed in Shetland ponies (N = 19).

Interventricular septum thickness in systole and diástole (IVSs and IVSd); left atrial diameter in diastole and systole (LAd and LAs), right atrial diameter in diastole and systole (RAd and RAs), left ventricular diameter in diastole and systole (LVd and LVs), right ventricular diameter in diastole and systole (RVd and RVs), left ventricular free wall thickness in systole and diastole (LVFWs and LVFWd), right ventricular free wall thickness in systole and diástole (RVFWs and RVFWd), tricuspid valve diameter (TVD), mitral valve diameter (MVD), aortic valve diameter (AoVD), and pulmonary trunk valve diameter (PTVD).

In the 19 ponies included, intra-observer variability was low. For the linear measurements performed, an ICC of 0.94 (95% CI: 0.88–0.98) was obtained, with a mean bias of −0.2 mm and limits of agreement from −1.8 to 1.4 mm in the Bland–Altman analysis. The intra-observer coefficient of variation was 3.2%. The CV% was 5.6%, confirming adequate repeatability given the relatively small size of the animals evaluated.

4 Discussion

The breed chosen for this study was the Shetland pony, recognized for its distinctive anatomical and physiological features, particularly in terms of thoracic conformation and body size, when compared with normal-sized horse breeds (6). The Shetland pony has a robust character, and its domestication has been booming, especially in Western countries, where its popularity as companion animals has grown, becoming increasingly popular as pets (4, 5). Likewise, its importance as an experimental animal is remarkable and it is used as an animal model in numerous investigations (7, 13).

The dissection of cardiovascular structures in Shetland pony specimens enabled a detailed evaluation of cardiac morphology and topographic relationships, supporting the interpretation of echocardiographic images. However, it is important to note that these comparisons are conceptual and illustrative in nature. The anatomical specimens did not originate from the same individuals as those undergoing echocardiography, and no quantitative correlation was performed. Therefore, the anatomical figures should be regarded as educational references to aid in the interpretation of standard two-dimensional echocardiographic views, rather than as evidence of direct anatomical-echocardiographic correlation.

In veterinary medicine, the clinical utility of combining anatomical dissection with imaging modalities has been consistently demonstrated. In equine species, anatomical findings have been validated against imaging techniques, such as thoracic ultrasound in live horses (24) and computed tomography angiography with anatomical dissection in neonatal foals (25), highlighting the complementary role of dissection and imaging. Cardiac research in horses has also benefited from this integrative approach: an association between congenital heart disease diagnosed by echocardiography and necropsy findings was confirmed in Arabian foals (26); a clinical case report documented a pseudoaneurysm, periaortic hematoma, pulmonary fistula, and thoracic aortic aneurysm in a Warmblood mare, with necropsy confirming the rupture and fistulation of the aneurysm (27); another case described a primary cardiac hemangiosarcoma, first identified by echocardiography and later confirmed by dissection (28). Furthermore, echocardiography and anatomical dissection have been jointly employed to investigate ischemic heart disease in horses, providing valuable information on the lesions relevant for clinical evaluation (29).

In order to reduce inter-individual variability and facilitate consistent anatomical interpretation, the animals included in this study were all clinically healthy adults, although relatively young when considering the Shetland pony’s potential lifespan, which may exceed 30 years. Both sexes were represented, and efforts were made to maintain similar body proportions across individuals. Although the body weight range was relatively wide (80.1–208.2 kg), the majority of animals fell close to the group median, and thoracic dimensions such as costal arch circumference and total body length showed limited dispersion. This sample composition likely contributed to the relatively low variability observed in the echocardiographic measurements, as supported by the low intra-observer coefficient of variation (3.2%) and high intraclass correlation coefficient (0.94). These factors support the internal consistency of our findings while still reflecting a representative adult Shetland pony population.

The measurements obtained in the group of Shetland ponies showed lower values than those reported for larger horse breeds (30), including the costal arch (118.5 ± 27.8 vs. 199.0 ± 7.0 cm), total length (97.3 ± 26.1 vs. 188.0 ± 10.0 cm), height at the withers (91.5 ± 17.4 vs. 162.0 ± 4.0 cm), and estimated weight (119.6 ± 62.7 vs. 627.0 ± 59.0 kg), reflecting their smaller physical size. In the echocardiographic study, reference images and measurements of different cardiac structures were obtained, as well as heart rate, calculated between two consecutive beats, with an average of 53.4 ± 18.7 bpm. This value was higher than that reported in a previous study on pony mares (40.4 ± 13.3 bpm) (31). Although heart rate variability has been considered as potentially related to stress, physiological discomfort, or seasonal influences, in this study the animals were examined in a calm standing position, in their usual environment, without sedation and with minimal restraint. An adaptation period was allowed prior to echocardiography to minimize handling-related excitation, and during the procedure the operator systematically monitored for clinical signs of stress or discomfort (e.g., ear position, restlessness, defensive movements, respiratory pattern). No overt signs of distress were observed, suggesting that the higher heart rate values recorded are more likely attributable to individual variability and seasonal or environmental factors rather than acute stress during the examination.

In equine medicine, right-sided echocardiographic views are widely employed and represent the standard approach for cardiac evaluation. However, as previously reported by Koenig et al. (20), obtaining left apical views in adult horses is often not feasible due to the deep intrathoracic position of the heart and the interposition of thoracic structures. In contrast, McConachie et al. (32) noted improved feasibility in foals and animals with smaller thoraxes. In our study, left-sided apical views were successfully obtained in all Shetland ponies; however, the clearest and most anatomically defined images were consistently observed in younger animals with lower body size and weight, most of whom were females. This suggests that while these views are feasible in this breed, their quality and reproducibility may be influenced by age, sex, and thoracic conformation, factors that should be considered when extrapolating to other populations or clinical contexts.

Only a limited number of studies have reported two-dimensional echocardiographic values in Shetland ponies, mostly based on small sample sizes. The present measurements contribute additional structural data and may serve as a foundation for future studies. Although functional assessment is clinically relevant, it was not included here due to methodological constraints, as it requires additional echocardiographic techniques beyond the scope of this descriptive work. Findings on left ventricular free wall thickness (LVFW) in clinically healthy Shetland ponies are consistent with those of D’Fonseca et al. (11), who reported a significant increase in mean left ventricular wall thickness in female ponies subjected to a long-term high-energy diet. This concordance supports the relevance of LVFW as a reliable anatomical parameter sensitive to hypertrophic changes in this breed. Although Shetland ponies are predisposed to hypertension, obesity, and secondary ventricular hypertrophy according to previous literature, our study did not include blood pressure measurements, and no evidence of overt left ventricular hypertrophy was observed in the examined animals. The animals analyzed presented body condition scores comparable to those previously reported for this breed, which may reflect their tendency to overweight, but within the limits compatible with clinically healthy status.

In comparison with the echocardiographic values reported by Sleeper et al. (13) in Shetland ponies, the present study revealed similar interventricular septal and free wall thicknesses, but smaller left ventricular and aortic root diameters. These differences may be explained by the characteristics of the study populations: while Sleeper et al. (13) examined only stallions with relatively high body condition scores, the present cohort included both males and females of varying age and body size. Differences in sex distribution and body condition are therefore likely to influence cardiac dimensions and account for the discrepancies observed between studies. Furthermore, when considering the allometric reference models proposed by Al-Haidar et al. (17) across multiple equine breeds and ponies (not exclusively Shetland ponies), the present values fall within the expected ranges for animals of comparable body size, reinforcing their suitability as breed-relevant measurements.

In contrast, multiple studies have reported two-dimensional mode echocardiographic parameters for larger equine breeds, where values are generally similar across Standard, Warmblood, and Friesian horses (17, 30, 33). In Shetland ponies, however, notably smaller cardiovascular structures were observed. For instance, the left ventricular diameter was approximately half that recorded in larger breeds. Reported IVSs and IVSd values in Standard horses are 4.6 and 3.1 cm, compared to 2.5 and 1.7 cm in this study. Similarly, LVs and LVd values in Standard (7.0 and 10.7 cm), Warmblood (11.6 and 17.0 cm), and Friesian horses (10.8 and 15.9 cm) (30, 33) far exceed those in Shetland ponies (3.2 and 5.7 cm). These differences indicate that left ventricular internal diameters in large-breed horses are more than twice those measured in the ponies. In contrast, LVFW and LVFWd values showed smaller differences between breeds, with Standard horses measuring 3.9 and 2.7 cm and Shetland ponies 2.8 and 1.9 cm. Vascular measurements have also been previously reported, for example the diameter of the Aorta for the standard horse was 7.2 (33), being a value similar to those reported for purebred animals. In the previous case, the value is higher than those of the Shetland pony group, in which a value of 3.8 was shown.

When compared with the echocardiographic values reported by Farag et al. (34) in healthy donkeys, Shetland ponies exhibited smaller cardiac dimensions overall. For example, left ventricular diameters were lower in ponies (LVIDd 5.4 cm; LVIDs 3.0 cm) than in donkeys (6.1 cm and 3.7 cm, respectively). Similarly, left ventricular free wall thicknesses were reduced in ponies (1.8 and 2.7 cm in diastole and systole) compared with donkeys (2.8 and 3.6 cm). Interventricular septal thickness in diastole was comparable between species (1.6 vs. 1.7 cm), but donkeys showed greater systolic values (2.9 vs. 2.3 cm). These differences are most likely attributable to the greater body size of donkeys, while Shetland ponies display proportionally more compact ventricular dimensions.

While echocardiographic dimensions in Shetland ponies showed similarities to those reported in other small equine breeds, notable differences were observed when compared to large-breed horses. These differences may have clinical consequences, as applying reference values from other breeds could lead to misclassification of cardiac dimensions or incorrect interpretation of normal variants as pathological. Therefore, establishing breed-specific reference data is important to improve diagnostic accuracy and guide appropriate clinical decision-making in Shetland ponies.

The results obtained in this study are subject to several important limitations. First, the sample size was relatively small and geographically restricted, which did not allow for a formal sample size calculation and may limit the generalizability of the findings to the broader Shetland pony population. Furthermore, this was an exploratory and descriptive study, designed to provide preliminary anatomical and echocardiographic reference information rather than to establish definitive normative values. The study population consisted predominantly of young Shetland ponies, which may have influenced the echocardiographic measurements and morphological observations reported. In equines, cardiac dimensions can change with age due to physiological remodeling, altered loading conditions, or subclinical degenerative processes. As such, the present findings should be interpreted primarily as reference values for young, healthy individuals, and may not fully capture variations present in older ponies. Future studies incorporating a broader age range would be valuable to define age-specific reference intervals and assess potential remodeling patterns across the lifespan.

Inter-observer reproducibility was not analyzed, as all measurements were performed by a single experienced operator. Furthermore, reproducibility was evaluated using a pooled ICC, without individual assessment for each parameter. While this approach indicates overall consistency, it may limit the extrapolation of the results to other evaluators or clinical settings, particularly for technically complex measurements. All ultrasound studies were performed with the same ultrasound machine. None of the anatomical images can be considered a perfect reference for the echocardiographic views; in particular, the transverse view optimized for visualization of the pulmonary trunk bifurcation (Figure 2) showed the poorest correspondence, mainly due to the absence of an extended segment of pulmonary arterial vasculature in the available specimens. In addition, adequate visualization of the mitral valve (Figure 4) could not be achieved, further limiting the anatomical echocardiographic correspondence. It should be noted that no direct caliper measurements of septal or wall thickness were performed on the anatomical specimens, since tissue freezing and sectioning may cause distortion of dimensions. Therefore, the study was not intended to establish precise numerical correlations with echocardiographic measurements, but rather to provide a visual anatomical reference for the interpretation of echocardiographic views in Shetland ponies.

In short, the present study aims to be an initial reference for the subsequent extension of the investigation of the echocardiographic and macroscopic measurements of the Shetland pony, in addition to serving as a visual atlas for the identification of the most important cardiovascular structures in echocardiography.

5 Conclusion

This study provides a detailed description of the main cardiovascular structures identifiable through two-dimensional echocardiography in healthy Shetland ponies, and offers anatomical reference images to support the interpretation of these structures in a breed-specific context. The echocardiographic measurements obtained were, as expected given the smaller body size of Shetland ponies, generally lower than those reported for larger equine breeds. These findings add complementary data to the limited information currently available for this breed and may contribute to future efforts aimed at refining breed-specific cardiovascular parameters.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Ethics statement

The requirement of ethical approval was waived by the Instituto de Investigación en Ciencias Biomédicas y de la Salud (IUIBS), Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria for the studies involving animals because Ethical review and approval were waived for this study because all the procedures were based in a purely observational study with voluntary enrolment and did not involve additional invasive clinical diagnostic procedures. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. Written informed consent was obtained from the owners for the participation of their animals in this study.

Author contributions

JM: Investigation, Conceptualization, Writing – original draft, Methodology. LP: Writing – original draft, Investigation, Validation, Methodology. MP-Q: Methodology, Investigation, Validation, Writing – original draft. AA: Investigation, Supervision, Methodology, Writing – original draft. GR: Methodology, Investigation, Writing – original draft, Supervision. MD-B: Investigation, Validation, Writing – original draft, Methodology.

Funding

The author(s) declared that financial support was not received for this work and/or its publication.

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declared that Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript. Generative AI was used solely to assist with English grammar verification and translation, as the authors are not native English speakers. All scientific content, data interpretation, and conclusions presented in this manuscript are entirely original and produced by the authors without the use of AI-generated material.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Morales Briceño, A, Méndez Sánchez, A, and Pérez Arévalo, J. Comparative study of the dorsal border of the neck in miniature horses. Rev Complut Cienc Vet. (2014) 8:49–60.

Google Scholar

2. Patiño-Quiroz, BE, Baldrich-Romero, E, Hernández-Sabi, C, and Correa-Dussan, R. Morphometric characterization in horses used as traction tools in Florencia-Caquetá. Rev Fac Cienc Agropecu. (2015) 7:26–31.

Google Scholar

3. Heck, L, Sanchez-Villagra, MR, and Stange, M. Why the long face? Comparative shape analysis of miniature, pony, and other horse skulls reveals changes in ontogenetic growth. PeerJ. (2019) 7:e7678. doi: 10.7717/peerj.7678,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Winton, CL, McMahon, R, Hegarty, MJ, McEwan, NR, Davies-Morel, MCG, Morgan, C, et al. Genetic diversity within and between British and Irish breeds: the maternal and paternal history of native ponies. Ecol Evol. (2020) 10:1352–67. doi: 10.1002/ece3.6004

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Muylle, S, Simoens, P, Lauwers, H, and Van Loon, G. Age determination in mini-Shetland ponies and donkeys. J Vet Med. (1999) 46:421–9. doi: 10.1046/j.1439-0442.1999.00258.x

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Van Bergen, HMJM, and Van Arendonk, JAM. Genetic parameters for linear type traits in Shetland ponies. Livest Prod Sci. (1993) 36:273–84. doi: 10.1016/0301-6226(93)90033-6

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Brinkmann, L, Gerken, M, Hambly, C, Speakman, JR, and Riek, A. Saving energy during hard times: energetic adaptations of Shetland pony mares. J Exp Biol. (2014) 217:4320–7. doi: 10.1242/jeb.110114

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Köhler, L, Schulz-Kornas, E, Vervuert, I, Gittel, C, Winter, K, Berner, D, et al. Volumetric measurements of paranasal sinuses and sinonasal communication in healthy Shetland ponies. BMC Vet Res. (2021) 17:8. doi: 10.1186/s12917-020-02698-4

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Gerlach, K, Vervuert, I, Gittel, C, Köhler, L, Schmidt, N, Winter, K, et al. Anatomical study of nasal Conchal bullae in Shetland ponies. Anat Histol Embryol. (2021) 50:431–8. doi: 10.1111/ahe.12648

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Spoormakers, TJP, Veraa, S, Graat, EAM, Van Weeren, PR, and Brommer, H. Breed differences in the equine vertebral column. J Anat. (2021) 239:829–38. doi: 10.1111/joa.13466,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

11. D’Fonseca, NMM, Beukers, M, Wijnberg, ID, de Solis C, N, de Ruijter Villani, M, van Doorn, A, et al. Effect of a long-term high-energy diet on cardiovascular parameters in Shetland pony mares. J Vet Intern Med. (2021) 35:2427–36. doi: 10.1111/jvim.16248

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Witkowska-Piłaszewicz, O, Cywińska, A, Michlik-Połczyńska, K, Czopowicz, M, Strzelec, K, Biazik, A, et al. Variations in haematological and biochemical parameters in healthy ponies. BMC Vet Res. (2021) 17:10. doi: 10.1186/s12917-021-02754-4

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Sleeper, MM, Bender, SJ, Kusewitt, DF, and McDonnell, SM. Chronic oral therapy with enalapril in normal ponies. J Vet Cardiol. (2008) 10:119–26. doi: 10.1016/j.jvc.2008.10.001,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Al-Haidar, A, Piquereau, J, Tual, L, Diquélou, A, Latouche, C, Thorin, C, et al. Ageing-related myocardial susceptibility to ischemia–reperfusion injury in ponies. PLoS One. (2013) 8:e69814. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0069814

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Slater, JD, and Herrtage, ME. Echocardiographic measurements of cardiac dimensions in normal ponies and horses. Equine Vet J. (1995) 27:82–3. doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1995.tb03039.x,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Taulescu, M, Palmieri, C, Leach, J, Nagy, A, Ober, C, Cernea, M, et al. Multiple congenital cardiovascular defects including type IV persistent truncus arteriosus in a Shetland pony. Acta Vet Hung. (2016) 64:360–4. doi: 10.1556/004.2016.034

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Al-Haidar, A, Moula, N, Leroux, A, Farnir, F, Deleuze, S, Sandersen, C, et al. Reference values of two-dimensional and M-mode echocardiographic measurements in equine breeds and ponies. J Vet Cardiol (2017) 19:492–501. doi: doi: 10.1016/j.jvc.2017.07.002, 29111285.

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Uldahl, M, Pihl, TH, Petersen, MR, Ersbøll, AK, and Andersen, PH. Body condition score in Danish horses related to type, use, and training. Animals. (2023) 13:1219. doi: 10.3390/ani13071219,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Koenig, TR, Mitchell, KJ, and Schwarzwald, CC. Echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular function using pulsed-wave tissue Doppler imaging. J Vet Intern Med. (2017) 31:556–67. doi: 10.1111/jvim.14668,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Koenig, TR, Schwarzwald, CC, Mitchell, KJ, and Bonagura, JD. Echocardiographic assessment of left apical views in adult horses. J Vet Cardiol. (2017) 19:45–54. doi: 10.1016/j.jvc.2016.09.002

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Sisson, S, and Grossman, JD. The anatomy of the domestic animals. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders (1982).

Google Scholar

22. Agüera Carmona, E, and Sandoval Juárez, J. Anatomía aplicada veterinaria: caballo, vaca y perro. 2nd Edn. Barcelona: Salvat Editores. (1988) 78–155.

Google Scholar

23. Buergelt, CD, Sapp, HL, Hines, SA, Miller, W, Wilson, J, and Gaskin, JM. Congenital defects of the cardiovascular system in horses. Vet Pathol. (2003) 40:405–11. doi: 10.1354/vp.40-4-405,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Vörös, K, Holmes, JR, and Gibbs, C. Anatomical validation of two-dimensional echocardiography in the horse. Equine Vet J. (1990) 22:392–7. doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1990.tb04312.x,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Arencibia, A, Corbera, JA, Ramírez, G, Díaz-Bertrana, ML, Pitti, L, Morales, M, et al. Anatomical assessment of the thorax in the neonatal foal using computed tomography angiography. Animals. (2020) 10:1045. doi: 10.3390/ani10061045,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Hall, TL, Magdesian, KG, and Kittleson, MD. Congenital cardiac defects in neonatal foals. J Vet Intern Med. (2010) 24:206–12. doi: 10.1111/j.1939-1676.2009.0432.x,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Saey, V, Decloedt, A, Van Poucke, M, Peelman, L, Van Loon, G, Vanderperren, K, et al. Aortopulmonary fistula in a warmblood mare associated with an aortic aneurysm. J Vet Intern Med (2020) 34:2152–2157. doi: doi: 10.1111/jvim.15841, 32926466.

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Beaumier, A, Dixon, CE, Robinson, N, Rush, JE, and Bedenice, D. Primary cardiac hemangiosarcoma in a horse. J Vet Cardiol. (2020) 32:66–72. doi: 10.1016/j.jvc.2020.05.002,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Scansen, BA. Equine congenital heart disease. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract. (2019) 35:103–17. doi: 10.1016/j.cveq.2018.11.002

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Vernemmen, I, Vera, L, Van Steenkiste, G, Van Loon, G, and Decloedt, A. Reference values for echocardiography in Friesian and warmblood horses. J Vet Intern Med. (2020) 34:2701–9. doi: 10.1111/jvim.15934,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Van Vollenhoven, E, Fletcher, L, Page, PC, Ganswindt, A, and Grant, CC. Heart rate variability in healthy pony mares. J Equine Vet Sci. (2017) 58:68–77. doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2017.07.006

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

32. McConachie, E, Rishniw, M, Baiker, K, and Patteson, M. Interpreting left ventricular wall motion in foals and small equids. Equine Vet J. (2013) 45:608–12. doi: 10.1111/evj.12042,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Bakos, Z, Vörös, K, Tóth, J, and Reiczigel, J. Two-dimensional and M-mode echocardiographic measurements in Standardbred trotters. Acta Vet Hung. (2002) 50:273–82. doi: 10.1556/AVet.50.2002.3.5,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Farag, F, Roushdy, M, Zaghloul, A, El Nahas, A, Gomaa, N, and El-Khodery, S. Two-dimensional guided M-mode echocardiographic study in clinically healthy donkeys (Equus asinus). J Equine Vet Sci. (2020) 87:102923. doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2019.102923

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Glossary

AAo - Ascending aorta

AngC - Angular cuspid

AoAr - Aortic arch

AoV - Aortic valve

AoVD - Aortic valve diameter

ArL - Arteriosus ligament

BCS - Body condition score

BT - Brachiocephalic trunk

Bpm - Beats per minute

CA - Costal arch circumference

CrVC - Cranial vena cava

CS - Coronary sulcus

CaVC - Caudal vena cava

FP - Fibrous pericardium

HA - Heart apex

IAS - Interatrial septum

IVS - Interventricular septum

IVSd - Interventricular septum thickness in diastole

IVSs - Interventricular septum thickness in systole

LA - Left atrium

LAAp - Left atrial appendage

LAd - Left atrial diameter in diastole

LAu - Left auricle

LAM - Left auricle mean diameter

LAs - Left atrial diameter in systole

LAt - Left atrium

LAtvV - Left atrioventricular valve

LPA - Left pulmonary artery

LV - Left ventricle

LVFWd - Left ventricular free wall thickness in diastole

LVFWs - Left ventricular free wall thickness in systole

LVM - Left ventricular muscle

LVd - Left ventricular diameter in diastole

LVs - Left ventricular diameter in systole

MV - Mitral valve

MVD - Mitral valve diameter

PM - Papillary muscle

ParC - Parietal cuspid

ParV - Parietal valvule

PIS - Paraconal interventricular sulcus

PT - Pulmonary trunk

PTV - Pulmonary trunk valve

PTVD - Pulmonary trunk valve diameter

PV - Pulmonary veins

RA - Right atrium

RAd - Right atrial diameter in diastole

RAs - Right atrial diameter in systole

RAtvV - Right atrioventricular valve

RAu - Right auricle

RAMD - Right auricle mean diameter

RM - Right marginal

RSV - Right semilunar valve

RPA - Right pulmonary artery

RV - Right ventricle

RVFWd - Right ventricular free wall thickness in diastole

RVFWs - Right ventricular free wall thickness in systole

RVM - Right ventricular muscle

RVd - Right ventricular diameter in diastole

RVs - Right ventricular diameter in systole

SepC - Septal cuspid

SepV - Septal valve

SepmT - Septomarginal trabecula

SIS - Subsinuosal interventricular sulcus

SSV - Septal semilunar valve

TAo - Thoracic aorta

TC - Tendinous cord

TL - Total body length

TVD - Tricuspid valve diameter

Keywords: anatomy, dissection, echocardiography, equine, heart, Shetland pony, ultrasound, veterinary

Citation: Matos JI, Pitti L, Parra-Quijano M, Arencibia A, Ramírez G and Díaz-Bertrana ML (2026) Integrative anatomical and two-dimensional ultrasonographic assessment of the heart in Shetland ponies. Front. Vet. Sci. 12:1721000. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1721000

Received: 08 October 2025; Revised: 27 December 2025; Accepted: 29 December 2025;
Published: 15 January 2026.

Edited by:

Ryohei Suzuki, Nippon Veterinary and Life Science University, Japan

Reviewed by:

Tomohiko Yoshida, Obihiro University of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, Japan
Sokol Duro, Agricultural University of Tirana, Albania

Copyright © 2026 Matos, Pitti, Parra-Quijano, Arencibia, Ramírez and Díaz-Bertrana. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Jorge Isidoro Matos, Sm9yZ2UubWF0b3NAdWxwZ2MuZXM=; Lidia Pitti, bHBpdHRpQGZwY3QudWxwZ2MuZXM=

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.