Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

REVIEW article

Front. Vet. Sci.

Sec. Animal Behavior and Welfare

From milk to solid: a review and meta-regression analysis on the effects of solid feed on veal calf welfare and abomasal lesions

Provisionally accepted
  • 1Department of Animal Medicine, Production and Health, Legnaro, Italy
  • 2University of Padua, Padua, Italy

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

This study reviewed the evolution of solid feed (SF) use in veal calf nutrition and conducted a regression meta-analysis to assess its effects on abomasal health. The traditional feeding system for veal calves consisted exclusively of liquid diets based on whole cow's milk, and more recently on formulated milk replacers. The provision of limited quantities of SF (50–250 g per calf per day) was mandated by European Union welfare regulations with the aim of improving physiological and behavioral development. Data from 13 studies published between 2000 and 2024 were analyzed to quantify the relationship between SF supply and abomasal lesions. The dataset revealed that during this time period the mean daily SF intake increased by approximately 700 g per calf. The meta-regression analysis showed a strong positive correlation between the daily dry matter of SF administered and the prevalence of abomasal damage, indicating that each additional 100 g of SF dry matter corresponded to a 4 ±1 percentage-point increase in lesion prevalence. Starch intake, rather than neutral detergent fiber (NDF) from SF, was significantly associated with lesion occurrence (P < 0.001). These findings suggest that while the inclusion of solids improved welfare compared with milk-only diets, current high-starch feeding practices compromise gastrointestinal integrity, highlighting the need to redefine optimal SF composition and inclusion levels for sustainable and welfare-oriented veal production.

Keywords: Abomasal lesions, Animal Welfare, Meta-regression analysis, Solid feed, veal calves

Received: 21 Oct 2025; Accepted: 28 Nov 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Cozzi, Magrin, Marcon and Contiero. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Luisa Magrin

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.