ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Vet. Sci.
Sec. Veterinary Humanities and Social Sciences
A survey on opinions, perceptions and attitudes of Swedish veterinarians - the Swedish veterinary disciplinary board
Provisionally accepted
- 1Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden
- 2Holmquist Juridik, Täby, Sweden
- 3Swedish Veterinary Association, Stockholm, Sweden
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Abstract Introduction: Veterinary disciplinary boards (VDBs) evaluate complaints from animal owners regarding the healthcare of animals. It is important that these boards safeguard the quality of veterinary care, but how veterinarians are affected psychosocially is also relevant. The aim of this study was to explore perceptions, attitudes and experiences among veterinarians concerning the Swedish VDB, taking account of respondent characteristics. Materials and methods: A web-based questionnaire targeting veterinarians in current or former clinical practice was launched in 2024. There were 1054 responses initiated and of these 819 were completed. Results: Half of the respondents had had complaints filed against them, but only 1 in 10 had received a sanction. Few veterinarians left clinical work because of VDB-related issues. Many veterinarians were relatively unaware about VDB processes and did not worry excessively about complaints being filed, respondents replying ‘cannot evaluate’ ranged 33-61% for these questions. However, 18% worried very much about having complaints filed. While veterinarians identified that VDB assessments increased record keeping and emphasis on communication, they generally felt that the VDB had relatively little effect on the patient outcomes for animals seen. Some animal owners who had previously submitted complaints would be denied access if veterinarians were aware of those complaints. Instituting operational oversight was considered a valuable adjunct to current regulation (43.7% ‘agreed completely’). Discussion: Overall, respondents found that the VDB performs an important task, while areas for improvement were identified, including transparency of procedures. One way to mitigate worries of complaints could be increased education and training in soft skills, including skills for communication and management of complaints.
Keywords: Complaint, regulation, Sanction, Veterinarian, Veterinary disciplinary board
Received: 25 Oct 2025; Accepted: 09 Dec 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Egenvall, Enlund, Holmquist and Rosenquist. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Agneta Egenvall
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.