Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Vet. Sci.

Sec. Zoological Medicine

This article is part of the Research TopicSurveillance and Control of Wildlife Diseases: Integrating Ecology, Pathology, and Public HealthView all 13 articles

'Segregate, Test, Observe and Persevere' (STOP): Strengthening ex situ breeding programmes for biodiversity in zoos amid highly pathogenic avian influenza threats – a case approach

Provisionally accepted
Anne  GüntherAnne Günther1Marco  RollerMarco Roller2Lukas  ReeseLukas Reese2Ulrike  FoldenauerUlrike Foldenauer3Judith  TyczkaJudith Tyczka4Anne  PohlmannAnne Pohlmann1Martin  BeerMartin Beer1Dominik  FischerDominik Fischer5Timm  HarderTimm Harder1*
  • 1Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Greifswald - Insel Riems, Germany
  • 2Zoological Garden Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, Germany
  • 3Public Order Office of the City of Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, Germany
  • 4State Institute for Chemical Analysis and Veterinary Diagnostics Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, Germany
  • 5Der Grune Zoo Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Zoos with avian populations are vulnerable to incursions of the high pathogenicity avian influenza (HPAI) H5Nx virus due to the free-range husbandry, bird population density and shared open water areas between zoo birds and wild waterfowl. An outbreak of HPAIV H5N1, genotype 2.3.4.4b EA AB, at the Zoological Garden Karlsruhe, Germany, in 2022, was managed applying legal restriction measures but exceptionally exempting culling orders for RT-qPCR-positive but healthy birds. A critical factor in the zoo's response was the rapid implementation of a segregation concept approved in advance. The entire bird population could be rapidly separated into epidemiological housing units (epUs) cared for by separate staff. A total of 79 birds initially tested RT-qPCR-positive, but only 21 (26.6%) clinically diseased birds had to be euthanized or succumbed. Seroconversion amounted to 94.8% of the remaining 58 birds. Extensive RT-qPCR investigations of 3,634 samples confirmed infections remained confined to three initially infected epUs out of a total of 25. Spread of virus in the infected epUs was limited to three weeks after segregation. In the cohort of infected pelicans, surviving individuals remained seropositive with elevated levels of H5-specific antibody titers for the following two years suggesting ongoing protection. The described science-based control measures based on a legally binding yet interpretive statement regarding the pertinent animal health legislation are exemplary for managing an outbreak of HPAI in zoos. Preventing unnecessary culling in zoos aids in conserving endangered avian species and individual birds in ex-situ conservation programs.

Keywords: wild birds, ex-situ breeding program, Zoological institution, wildlife-zoo interface, disease prevention

Received: 18 Sep 2025; Accepted: 15 Jan 2026.

Copyright: © 2026 Günther, Roller, Reese, Foldenauer, Tyczka, Pohlmann, Beer, Fischer and Harder. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Timm Harder

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.