Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Vet. Sci.

Sec. Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care Medicine

This article is part of the Research TopicAdvances in drug development, residues management and emerging contaminantsView all articles

Comparison of adsorptive capacity for different types of activated charcoal for common veterinary toxicants

Provisionally accepted
Anika  ChagantiAnika ChagantiBenjamin  M BrainardBenjamin M Brainard*
  • University of Georgia, Athens, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Abstract Activated charcoal (AC) is a convenient, effective method for gastrointestinal decontamination, typically supplied as either activated charcoal powder (pAC) or proprietary mixtures in granules or suspension (e.g, Toxiban®, Tox). We compared the adsorptive capacity for common veterinary toxicants of a new resin-bound activated charcoal product (Ready RescueTM; RR) to AC and Tox. We hypothesized that RR is equivalent to Tox and AC in binding of these toxicants. Solutions of simulated low pH (pH=1.5) and neutral (pH 6-7) environments were incubated at 38℃ with continuous agitation. Commercial products containing the following toxicants (final concentration) were evaluated: Naproxen (8.8 mg/mL), ivermectin (1.1 mg/mL), bromethalin (0.028 mg/mL), xylitol (17.9 mg/mL), ethylene glycol (400 mg/mL), Delta-9 THC (1.5 mg/mL), baker's chocolate (567 mg/mL), roquefortine (500 mg/mL of cheese), tartaric acid (133 mg/mL). Toxicants were incubated in separate reaction mixtures for 30 minutes before the equivalent of 15 g of charcoal product (RR, AC, or Tox) was added. The reaction mixtures were sampled prior to charcoal addition, and at 30, 60, and 240 minutes after, and assayed for toxicant concentration. The different AC formulations decreased concentrations of the assayed toxicant in most tested conditions, in both acidic and neutral pH environments. Exceptions included tartaric acid, bromethalin, ethylene glycol, and xylitol, which showed variable changes in concentration. In general, the rate of decrease was similar between AC products with the exception of Delta-9 THC in the neutral environment, where Tox showed a more rapid rate of decrease than RR. In this in vitro system, the three tested AC products effectively decreased concentration of most toxicants over a 4 h period, with pAC and Tox showing a more rapid rate of decline for some toxicants compared to RR.

Keywords: activated charcoal, Adsorption, intoxication, Veterinary, veterinary emergency and critical care

Received: 06 Nov 2025; Accepted: 12 Jan 2026.

Copyright: © 2026 Chaganti and Brainard. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Benjamin M Brainard

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.