ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Vet. Sci.
Sec. One Health
Salmonella surveillance in raw pet food and dogs in Great Britain, 2013-2022
Provisionally accepted- 1Animal and Plant Health Agency (United Kingdom), Addlestone, United Kingdom
- 2University of Surrey, Guildford, United Kingdom
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background. The rising popularity of raw meat pet food for dogs in Great Britain has prompted concerns about its potential role in transmitting zoonotic pathogens, particularly Salmonella. Aim. To investigate correlations between Salmonella isolated from dog food (both raw and heat-treated) and from dogs, using historical passive surveillance data from manufacturing plants and clinical samples. Methods. Data collected by the Animal and Plant Health Agency from 2013 to 2022 (phenotypically-determined Salmonella serovars plus their phage types and disc-diffusion antimicrobial resistance profiles) were compared between dog food and canine clinical sources. Results. Over time both the number and serovar diversity of Salmonella isolations from raw meat pet food increased, from 4 isolates of 4 serovars in 2013 to 606 isolates of 39 serovars in 2022, in parallel with a five-fold increase in the number of raw meat pet food plants operating in Great Britain. Between 2021 and 2022, following the implementation of statutory Salmonella reporting in dogs, considerable overlaps in serovar distributions were observed between raw meat pet food and dog samples, with serovars of significant public health importance such as S. Typhimurium, monophasic S. Typhimurium and S. Infantis among the top ten most frequently isolated from both sources. Some clinically relevant serovars, such as S. Typhimurium and S. Dublin, were over twice as frequent among dog isolates. Antimicrobial resistance patterns revealed some correlations between sources for certain serovars, such as S. Typhimurium, while for others (including S. Dublin) resistance patterns were unique to the dog isolates. Resistances to cefotaxime, ceftazidime or ciprofloxacin were rare, although exceptionally 9.9% of S. Infantis isolates from raw meat pet food showed ciprofloxacin resistance. S. Kentucky resistant to cefotaxime, ceftazidime and ciprofloxacin was isolated from a dog sample. Conclusions. Despite limitations for establishing direct transmission pathways, the findings highlight raw meat pet food as a potential vector for Salmonella transmission, emphasising the risks to both animal and public health and underlining the need for vigilant monitoring and hygiene practices. For antimicrobial resistance risk, generally high susceptibility to the extended spectrum cephalosporin and fluoroquinolone classes is reassuring, although the detection of multi-drug-resistant strains highlights ongoing concerns.
Keywords: antimicrobial resistance, Dogs, foodborne pathogen, raw meat pet food, Salmonella, Zoonoses
Received: 20 Nov 2025; Accepted: 30 Jan 2026.
Copyright: © 2026 Snow, Wales, Withenshaw, Lawes, Mackintosh and Martelli. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Lucy C Snow
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
