ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Vet. Sci.
Sec. Animal Behavior and Welfare
In their own words: Qualitative interviews with veterinarians on handling decisions during dog examinations
Provisionally accepted- 1Texas Tech University, Lubbock, United States
- 2The University of Iowa, Iowa City, United States
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Introduction: Routine veterinary visits can be a major source of fear and stress in dogs, creating welfare concerns and safety risks for veterinary teams and owners. Although stress-reducing practices have been widely promoted, limited research has examined how veterinarians describe their handling decisions and the factors that shape them in everyday practice. This qualitative study aimed to 1) explore how veterinarians in Canada and the United States conduct routine canine dog physical examinations; 2) identify clinic-, patient-, client-, and veterinarian-related factors, including professional well-being, that influence handling decisions; and 3) examine veterinarians' perceptions of stress-reducing practices, including perceived benefits and challenges. This is a provisional file, not the final typeset article Methods: Virtual semi-structured individual interviews were conducted with 17 veterinarians who provide clinical care to dogs between November 2024 and February 2025. Participants were recruited using snowball and convenience sampling. Transcripts were analyzed using inductive content analysis within an interpretivist paradigm. Results: Four major categories and 11 sub-categories emerged from the data: 1) approaches to dog handling; 2) factors affecting handling approaches; 3) veterinarian professional well-being; and 4) perceptions of stress-reducing practices. Discussion: Handling during routine dog physical examinations reflects negotiation between patient needs, safety, workplace constraints, and veterinarian well-being, with stress-reducing practices valued and utilized, yet not perceived to be uniformly feasible across situations. Clinic-level support (team training, supportive management, scheduling) and attention to veterinarians' professional well-being may promote more consistent use of stress-reducing handling, improving canine dog welfare, safety, and owner experiences.
Keywords: clinical practice, handling decisions, Professional well-being, stress-reducing practices, veterinary perceptions
Received: 04 Dec 2025; Accepted: 30 Jan 2026.
Copyright: © 2026 Nakonechny, Schroeder and Stellato. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Anastasia Chiara Stellato
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.