From Bedside to Outcome: Integrating Clinical Trials and Real-World Data (RWD) to Optimize Drug Development and Patient Care

  • 2,787

    Total downloads

  • 20k

    Total views and downloads

About this Research Topic

This Research Topic is currently accepting articles, but is closing soon.

Background

In recent years, significant therapeutic advances across multiple disease areas—including immuno-oncology, metabolic diseases such as type 2 diabetes and obesity (e.g., GLP-1 receptor agonists), and neurodegenerative conditions like Alzheimer’s disease—have resulted in a surge of clinical trial data. Concurrently, the increasing availability of high-quality real-world data (RWD) from electronic health records, claims databases, patient registries, and digital health tools presents an unprecedented opportunity to complement clinical trial evidence.

To fully realize the value of these rich data sources, there is an urgent need for integrated approaches. Specifically, bridging randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and real-world data (RWD) is essential not only to optimize drug development, but also to generate the robust, multidimensional evidence required for health technology assessment (HTA), reimbursement, and health policy decision-making. Quantitative approaches—such as population modeling and Bayesian prediction—enable synthesis of evidence from both controlled and real-world settings, directly informing the evaluation of new therapies in real-world patient populations and subsequently guiding healthcare decisions.

This Research Topic aims to highlight the practical impact of integrating clinical trial, real-world, and quantitative evidence on healthcare decisions. We welcome studies that demonstrate how such integration informs policy, reimbursement, and HTA; leverages RWD to improve trial design and regulatory submissions; applies quantitative methods to bridge trial and real-world settings; or illustrates, through case studies, how evidence generation has advanced patient care and access.

Topics of interest include, but are not limited to:

• Comparative effectiveness research using integrated RCT and/or RWD sources for HTA or reimbursement decisions

• Applications of quantitative analysis (population, Bayesian, etc.) to bridge trial and real-world settings for assessing effectiveness and improving patient access.

• Leveraging RWD to support regulatory and payer submissions as well as post-marketing evaluations

• RWD-driven management of drug-drug interactions and adverse event mitigation in clinical practice and post-market evaluations

• Case studies describing how integrated evidence generation has influenced patient access, outcomes, health policy, or reimbursement pathways

By connecting research insights “from bedside to outcome to policy,” this collection seeks to define a forward-looking paradigm for evidence generation—one that not only advances the science, but also translates into demonstrable gains in patient care, policy, and reimbursement. By focusing on integration with a clear impact on healthcare decisions, we aim to foster collaboration among clinicians, clinical pharmacologists, epidemiologists, data scientists, HTA experts, and healthcare decision-makers.

Article types and fees

This Research Topic accepts the following article types, unless otherwise specified in the Research Topic description:

  • Brief Research Report
  • Clinical Trial
  • Curriculum, Instruction, and Pedagogy
  • Data Report
  • Editorial
  • FAIR² Data
  • General Commentary
  • Hypothesis and Theory
  • Methods

Articles that are accepted for publication by our external editors following rigorous peer review incur a publishing fee charged to Authors, institutions, or funders.

Keywords: clinical trials, comparative effectiveness, drug-drug interaction, real-world data (RWD), real-world evidence (RWE), clinical pharmacology, model-informed drug development (MIDD), PK/PD modeling

Important note: All contributions to this Research Topic must be within the scope of the section and journal to which they are submitted, as defined in their mission statements. Frontiers reserves the right to guide an out-of-scope manuscript to a more suitable section or journal at any stage of peer review.

Topic editors

Manuscripts can be submitted to this Research Topic via the main journal or any other participating journal.

Impact

  • 20kTopic views
  • 14kArticle views
  • 2,787Article downloads
View impact