Brain organoid and brain-on-a-chip technologies
Advances in three-dimensional (3D) neural culture models derived from human stem cells are revolutionizing the paradigm of neuroscience research. These 3D model systems offer a more faithful recapitulation of pivotal functions and cytoarchitectures of in-vivo neural tissues than conventional two-dimensional (2D) culture models and animal models (Zhuang et al., 2018).
To establish these 3D neural models, brain organoids (Lee et al., 2017), and brain-on-a-chip systems (Haring et al., 2017) represent two typical approaches based on the strategies of developmental biology and bioengineering, respectively. Brain organoids are formed by sequential steps in neural development in vitro, including generation of embryoid bodies (EBs) from stem cells, induction of neuroectoderm in a dish, expansion of neuroepithelium in Matrigel, and organoid differentiation in suspension (Jo et al., 2016). Brain organoids explore the power of developmental biology to reproduce the early stages of fetal brain development, including polarized neuroepithelium, cell type heterogeneity and segregation of discrete brain regions (Luo et al., 2016). In contrast, brain-on-a-chip systems provide better capacity to reconstitute in-vivo neural microenvironments including intercellular interactions, extracellular matrix (ECM), and hemodynamics, in a deterministic manner. However, both of these approaches have their own limitations. For instance, the brain organoid culture systems usually have very limited controllability over biochemical and biophysical factors in the surrounding 3D microenvironment, while the brain-on-a-chip systems are unable to reconstitute the biological complexity existing during the brain development.
By combining the advantages of both organ-on-a-chip and organoid technologies through a synergistic strategy, the organoid-on-a-chip platform has emerged as a new model to recapitulate the essential structural and physiological features of the in vivo tissue and the corresponding 3D tissue microenvironment (Skardal et al., 2016; Takebe et al., 2017). Following this concept, a recent paper from the Qin Group (Wang et al., 2018) demonstrated a brain organoid-on-a-chip system, which displayed remarkable capacity for a better study of prenatal neurological disorders.
Brain organoid-on-a-chip
Nicotine is recognized as a neurotoxin to trigger various neural dysfunctions and long-lasting deficit when exposing to the fetal brain (Pauly and Slotkin, 2008). Moreover, neurobehavioural disorders associated with maternal smoking during pregnancy are related to offspring intelligence (Breslau et al., 2005), anxiety behaviors (Moylan et al., 2015), cognitive ability (Batty et al., 2006), and neurodegenerative diseases of adulthood (Picciotto, 2008). However, the understanding of human neurological disorder under prenatal nicotine exposure (PNE) is an outstanding challenge due to the differences in histomorphology, physiology, and spatiotemporal patterns of neurodevelopment between humans and mice. The study by the Qin Group (Wang et al., 2018) established a brain organoid-on-a-chip system to model neurodevelopmental disorders for investigating PNE in vitro.
The brain organoid-on-a-chip consisted of two culture channels, one perfusion channel and two medium channels (Figure 1A). To generate the brain organoid, EBs mixed in Matrigel were pipetted into each culture channels for in situ 3D differentiation. The differentiation microenvironment on the chip recapitulated the in vivo fetal brain development by precisely controlling the biochemical and mechanical cues.
Figure 1
Consistent with the early stages of human brain organogenesis, this synergistically engineered model clearly revealed the feasibility of well-recognized neuronal differentiation, diverse brain regional identities, and cortical organization in the microfluidic chip (Figure 1B). In the areas mimicking neural differentiation, the organoids showed a high proportion of distinct neural identities, including markers for neural progenitor cells (SOX2) and neurons (TUJ1). Likewise, the different brain regional identities during brain organoid development were stained positive by the specific markers such as PAX6 and ISL1, suggesting the early developing forebrain and hindbrain. Furthermore, the layered cortical architecture could verify the initiation of the cortical plate layer formation, which was characterized by the deep-layer marker CTIP2 located adjacent and internal to the TBR1-positive pre-plate.
To investigate neurodevelopment under PNE, the authors focused on the effect of varying doses of nicotine on the development of brain organoids. During brain organogenesis on the chip, nicotine treatment led to premature neuronal differentiation and disruption of brain regionalization. Moreover, the authors utilized the brain organoids-on-a-chip model to examine nicotine-induced impaired cortical development from days 35 to 40, and the data might contribute to a better understanding of various postnatal cognitive dysfunctions under PNE. Intriguingly, these brain organoids exposed to nicotine showed the abnormal neurite outgrowth at a dose-dependent manner. The similar brain organoid-on-a-chip system has also been used to reveal the mechanism of the impaired neurogenesis under exposure to cadmium (Yin et al., 2018) and alcohol (Zhu et al., 2017).
Compared to the previous 3D neural culture models (Lancaster et al., 2013; Bouyer et al., 2016) which were based solely on the engineering approach or the developmental biology approach, the bioengineered brain organoids used in this study (Wang et al., 2018) more truthfully mimicked the brain development under PNE by integrating brain organoid in a microfluidic device. In addition, optically transparent property of the microfluidic device facilitated in situ real-time imaging of the neurodevelopmental process and the brain organoid responses to nicotine.
Future perspective
A clear understanding of the early stages of human embryonic development is essential for a thorough investigation into the effects of PNE on human brain development. Despite that great efforts have been devoted to interrogating the effects of PNE on rodent models (Abreu-Villaça et al., 2004), the understanding of the human brain development under PNE remains elusive due to the significant difference between human and rodent physiology. Brain organoid-on-a-chip system utilized in the current work (Wang et al., 2018) could possibly serve as an alternative human-relevant neurodevelopmental model, eliminating ethical concerns regarding human clinical trials in smoking pregnant women.
For basic and translational neuroscience research, generation of standardized and homogenous brain organoid is critical but remain an unsolved issue in this system. Nevertheless, brain organoid-on-a-chip system opens a new avenue for modeling the human prenatal neurodevelopmental disorders. We expect that this commentary will stimulate motivation to expand the applications of organoid-on-a-chip systems and more complex multi-organoid-on-a-chip systems in screening of drug candidates, probing of disease mechanisms, as well as advancing novel therapies.
Statements
Author contributions
YZ and PC conceived the idea. HQ, YZ, and PC wrote the paper.
Funding
We gratefully acknowledge the financial support from National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31871018).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1
Abreu-VillaçaY.SeidlerF. J.SlotkinT. A. (2004). Does prenatal nicotine exposure sensitize the brain to nicotine-induced neurotoxicity in adolescence?Neuropsychopharmacology29, 1440–1450. 10.1038/sj.npp.1300443
2
BattyG. D.DerG.DearyI. J. (2006). Effect of maternal smoking during pregnancy on offspring's cognitive ability: empirical evidence for complete confounding in the us national longitudinal survey of youth. Pediatrics118, 943–950. 10.1542/peds.2006-0168
3
BouyerC.ChenP.GüvenS.DemirtaşT. T.NielandT. J.PadillaF.et al. (2016). A bio-acoustic levitational (BAL) assembly method for engineering of multilayered, 3D brain-like constructs, using human embryonic stem cell derived neuro-progenitors. Adv. Mater.28, 161–167. 10.1002/adma.201503916
4
BreslauN.PanethN.LuciaV. C.Paneth-PollakR. (2005). Maternal smoking during pregnancy and offspring IQ. Int. J. Epidemiol.34, 1047–1053. 10.1093/ije/dyi163
5
HaringA. P.SontheimerH.JohnsonB. N. (2017). Microphysiological human brain and neural systems-on-a-chip: potential alternatives to small animal models and emerging platforms for drug discovery and personalized medicine. Stem Cell Rev.13, 381–406. 10.1007/s12015-017-9738-0
6
JoJ.XiaoY.SunA. X.CukurogluE.TranH. D.GökeJ.et al. (2016). Midbrain-like organoids from human pluripotent stem cells contain functional dopaminergic and neuromelanin-producing neurons. Cell Stem Cell19, 248–257. 10.1016/j.stem.2016.07.005
7
LancasterM. A.RennerM.MartinC. A.WenzelD.BicknellL. S.HurlesM. E.et al. (2013). Cerebral organoids model human brain development and microcephaly. Nature501, 373–379. 10.1038/nature12517
8
LeeC. T.BendriemR. M.WuW. W.ShenR. F. (2017). 3D brain organoids derived from pluripotent stem cells: promising experimental models for brain development and neurodegenerative disorders. J. Biomed. Sci.24:59. 10.1186/s12929-017-0362-8
9
LuoC.LancasterM. A.CastanonR.NeryJ. R.KnoblichJ. A.EckerJ. R. (2016). Cerebral organoids recapitulate epigenomic signatures of the human fetal brain. Cell Rep.17, 3369–3384. 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.12.001
10
MoylanS.GustavsonK.ØverlandS.KarevoldE. B.JackaF. N.PascoJ. A.et al. (2015). The impact of maternal smoking during pregnancy on depressive and anxiety behaviors in children: the norwegian mother and child cohort study. BMC Med.13:24. 10.1186/s12916-014-0257-4g
11
PaulyJ. R.SlotkinT. A. (2008). Maternal tobacco smoking, nicotine replacement and neurobehavioural development. Acta Paediatr.97, 1331–1337. 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2008.00852.x
12
PicciottoM. R. (2008). Neuroprotection via nachrs: The role of nachrs in neurodegenerative disorders such as alzheimer's and parkinson's disease. Front. Biosci.13:492–504. 10.2741/2695
13
SkardalA.ShupeT.AtalaA. (2016). Organoid-on-a-chip and body-on-a-chip systems for drug screening and disease modeling. Drug Dis. Today21, 1399–1411. 10.1016/j.drudis.2016.07.003
14
TakebeT.ZhangB.RadisicM. (2017). Synergistic engineering: organoids meet organs-on-a-chip. Cell Stem Cell21, 297–300. 10.1016/j.stem.2017.08.016
15
WangY.WangL.ZhuY.QinJ. (2018). Human brain organoid-on-a-chip to model prenatal nicotine exposure. Lab Chip18, 851–860. 10.1039/C7LC01084B
16
YinF.ZhuY.WangY.QinJ. (2018). Engineering brain organoids to probe impaired neurogenesis induced by cadmium. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng.4, 1908–1915. 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.8b00160
17
ZhuY.WangL.YuH.YinF.WangY.LiuH.et al. (2017). In situ generation of human brain organoids on a micropillar array. Lab Chip17, 2941–2950. 10.1039/C7LC00682A
18
ZhuangP.SunA. X.AnJ.ChuaC. K.ChewS. Y. (2018). 3D neural tissue models: from spheroids to bioprinting. Biomaterials154, 113–133. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.10.002
Summary
Keywords
brain, Organoid, organ-on-a-chip, prenatal neurological disorder, nicotine exposure
Citation
Qiao H, Zhang YS and Chen P (2018) Commentary: Human brain organoid-on-a-chip to model prenatal nicotine exposure. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 6:138. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2018.00138
Received
16 July 2018
Accepted
13 September 2018
Published
04 October 2018
Volume
6 - 2018
Edited by
Massimo Alberti, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore
Reviewed by
Toshio Takahashi, Suntory Foundation for Life Sciences, Japan; Antoni Homs-Corbera, Cherry Biotech, France
Updates
Copyright
© 2018 Qiao, Zhang and Chen.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Yu Shrike Zhang yszhang@research.bwh.harvard.eduPu Chen puchen@whu.edu.cn
This article was submitted to Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, a section of the journal Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.