Classically, the zebrafish model organism has been used to elucidate the genetic and cellular mechanisms related to development since the embryo forms and grows externally following fertilization. This provides insight into the genetic control of developmental processes in humans because their genomes are similar. Also, unlike other animal models, the genes of zebrafish can be manipulated quite easily by using reverse genetic screens tools such as morpholinos, which transiently silence target genes of interest or systems such as the transposon-mediated insertional mutagenesis or CRISPR-Cas9. Moreover, one pair of fish will provide up to 300 offspring, which means that if there is a gene of interest that is manipulated, then it can be transmitted to a large population of fish. What is beginning to emerge is that similar to other mammals, adult zebrafish have an integrated nervous system, which is proposed to contain homologous brain structures to those found in humans, as well as equivalent cellular and synaptic structure and function. Moreover, like humans, zebrafish exhibit age-related declines in cognitive functions, and a convergence of evidence has indicated that subtle changes in cellular and synaptic integrity underlie these changes. Therefore, the zebrafish is a powerful model organism for studying the neurobiological consequences of aging-related behavioral and biological changes, which offers the potential to identify possible interventions that would promote healthy aging. In what follows, we present and discuss recent findings and advances along these directions.
Behavioral tasks and abilities altered in aged zebrafish
The zebrafish is a promising model for studying age-related changes in cognition and perception. Early behavioral studies date back to 1960s and the characterization of zebrafish behavior has accelerated since 2000 (Kalueff et al., 2013). They have been suggested to reflect the evolutionarily conserved nature of many behaviors and to resemble those of other species (Kalueff et al., 2014; Stewart et al., 2014; Orger and de Polavieja, 2017). A rich repertoire of behavioral phenotypes has been identified for cognitive functioning, perceptual processes, and associated disorders (Stewart and Kalueff, 2012). Using different behavioral assays (e.g., inter- and intra-trial habituation, T-maze, conditioned place preference paradigms), previous studies indicated that zebrafish have both simple and relatively complex forms of learning, and also display good performance on cognitive tasks dependent on short-term and long-term memory (Blaser and Vira, 2014; Gerlai, 2016). There is also growing interest in other aspects of zebrafish behavior which significantly depend on perception, low-level discrimination, and sensitivity (Neuhauss, 2010). For instance, the basic components of the zebrafish visual system, the visual processing hierarchy, and pathways are similar to those commonly found in other species (Bilotta and Saszik, 2001). In particular, most of the previous research evaluated visual motion perception and sensitivity through optomotor response and/or optokinetic reflexive eye movements. These behavioral studies point to qualitatively similar visual acuity and contrast sensitivity functions for zebrafish (Rinner et al., 2005; Haug et al., 2010; Tappeiner et al., 2012). It has also been shown that zebrafish perceive first- and second-order motion. They also experience motion illusions commonly used in studies on human vision such as reverse-phi illusion, motion aftereffect, and rotating snakes illusion (Orger et al., 2000; Gori et al., 2014; Najafian et al., 2014). Within the context of visual motion, these studies provide behavioral evidence that mechanisms and principles similar to those of humans and other species underlie zebrafish sensory processing and associated behavior.
Characterizing aging-related changes in zebrafish behavior has important implications for our understanding of cognition and perception. First, aging-related changes in cognition are a part of the normal aging process and common in all the species. Monitoring age-dependent changes in cognition and perception is difficult to perform on the same human subject throughout life. Due to their short lifespan, behavioral assays and paradigms developed, zebrafish provides an ideal model to study cognitive and perceptual performance during aging. Second, when these behavioral studies are combined with already developed molecular and genetic tools on this aging model, we will also have a deeper understanding on the functional links between key synaptic targets, cognition, and perception during neural aging. Previous studies report significant declines in learning and memory in aged zebrafish. Typically, old zebrafish have less performance on tasks relevant with associative learning, avoidance, spatial learning and working memory (Yu et al., 2006; Arey and Murphy, 2017; Brock et al., 2017). Compared to wild-types, mutants with impaired acetylcholinesterase function had better performance in spatial learning, entrainment and increased rate of learning (Yu et al., 2006; Parker et al., 2015). These findings suggest that cholinergic signaling may also play a role in age-related cognitive decline. In terms of perceptual performance, there are studies comparing larvae and adult zebrafish. However, we have limited knowledge on how perceptual performance (and thus perception and sensitivity) changes during neural aging. A challenge for the future is to characterize aging-related changes in perceptual performance and sensitivity of adult zebrafish. As mentioned above, we consider that such studies can provide comprehensive information not only on perception and behavior in general (Owsley, 2016) but also on the cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying specific aspects (e.g., motion) of perception and sensitivity.
Aging-related neurobiological alterations
Understanding the cellular mechanisms that underlie cognitive decline is important for determining sites of actions for possible interventions that could ameliorate alterations in cognitive function. Early reports indicated that age-related cognitive decline was due to significant cell (Brody, 1955; Devaney and Johnson, 1980; Henderson et al., 1980) and synapse loss (Geinisman et al., 1977; Bondareff, 1979; Curcio and Hinds, 1983; Haug and Eggers, 1991; Shi et al., 2005). However, it has become well accepted that significant cell (Haug and Eggers, 1991; Rapp and Gallagher, 1996; Rasmussen et al., 1996; Peters et al., 1998) and synapse loss does not occur in conjunction with normal aging-related declines in cognitive capacities (Poe et al., 2001; Newton et al., 2007; Shi et al., 2007). Therefore, research studies have been designed at examining markers of cellular and synaptic integrity during the aging process, such as altered neurogenesis rates (Kempermann et al., 1998, Luo et al., 2006) and the levels of key excitatory and inhibitory pre- and post-synaptic proteins (Newton et al., 2007; Shi et al., 2007; Adams et al., 2008), since subtle changes in cellular and synaptic functions likely underlie the aging-related declines in cognitive abilities. Moreover, examining key molecular targets that control these processes will increase our understanding of the cellular and synaptic regulation of behavior across the lifespan.
While these aging-related changes in cellular and synaptic processes could be examined in many different animal species, the zebrafish model organism is well-adapted to studying the cellular and molecular changes with aging because they have similar patterns as mammals with regards to the cellular aging process. Zebrafish on average live approximately three to five years and share a similar genome with humans (Kishi et al., 2003; Howe et al., 2013). Moreover, senescence-associated ß-galactosidase, which is a biomarker of aging, increases with advancing age in zebrafish, and this cellular alteration has been described in humans as well (Kishi et al., 2003; Arslan-Ergul et al., 2016). Finally, zebrafish have continued neurogenesis even into late adulthood (Kizil et al., 2012; Schmidt et al., 2013), they express key excitatory and inhibitory pre- and post-synaptic proteins (Karoglu et al., 2017), and classical cellular synaptic plasticity (i.e., long-term potentiation) is found in their brains (Nam et al., 2004). Recent work in the zebrafish brain has demonstrated that there are age-related declines in genes related to cellular and synaptic structure and growth (Arslan-Ergul and Adams, 2014), neurogenesis (Edelmann et al., 2013; Arslan-Ergul et al., 2016), and synaptic alterations (Arslan-Ergul et al., 2016; Karoglu et al., 2017). Interestingly, as has been shown in mammals, these changes depend on the gender of the animal (Arslan-Ergul and Adams, 2014; Karoglu et al., 2017), and the data are in good agreement with those showing sexually-dimorphic patterns published in young zebrafish brains (Ampatzis et al., 2012). Taken together, these findings indicate that the zebrafish is an appropriate model to study the effects of cellular and synaptic aging and its relationship to cognitive decline.
Use of interventions to alter aging-related processes
A major goal of research related to elucidating the altered cellular and synaptic processes that underlie cognitive aging is to determine possible interventions to restore youthful cellular and synaptic function. As was mentioned previously, mutant zebrafish with lower levels of acetylcholinesterase had better performance in spatial learning, entrainment, and increased rate of learning (Yu et al., 2006; Parker et al., 2015). Therefore, these animals likely have a more youthful cellular and synaptic profile as compared to their wild-type counterparts. Currently, we are investigating this possibility and our data suggest that genetic manipulation of the cholinergic system alters the course of aging-related changes in the synaptic protein levels. We have demonstrated that at old ages as compared to their wild-type siblings, mutants have higher levels of synaptophysin, which is an indicator of presynaptic integrity, and gephyrin, a component of post-synaptic inhibitory transmission, and interestingly these changes are gender-dependent (Karoglu et al., 2018). If we can determine the cellular and synaptic profile of these mutants and how they relate to cognitive aging, it would provide potential targets for drug development to ameliorate the effects of cognitive decline.
Another potential intervention with promise is dietary restriction (DR), which is the only non-genetic intervention that reliably increases both lifespan and healthspan. Numerous studies have shown that a lifelong reduction in caloric intake from ad libitum levels increases lifespan (Roth et al., 2001; Lin et al., 2002; Colman et al., 2009). Additionally, DR increases neuronal proliferation and survival (Lee et al., 2002; Kitamura et al., 2006; Park and Lee, 2011; Park et al., 2013). We applied a short-term DR of 10 weeks and observed that this treatment did not prevent an age-related decline in cell proliferation but altered the telomere lengths of these neuronal cells (Arslan-Ergul et al., 2016), thereby DR exerted positive effects by subtly altering the cell cycle dynamics of these neurons. We have tested the timing and duration of short-term DR and a potential DR-mimetic, rapamycin, as the positive effects of DR are thought to be modulating the mammalian target of rapamycin signaling pathway. Our data indicate that a longer duration of both DR and its mimetic is more effective on aging-related changes in synaptic protein levels and transcripts, which might reflect a conserved mechanism of the beneficial effects of DR and rapamycin on life- and healthspan (Celebi-Birand et al., 2018). These studies also have the potential to provide suitable therapeutic targets around which drug development can proceed for ameliorating the devastating effects of cognitive decline.
Conclusions
The zebrafish is clearly a powerful model organism that can be used to understand the aging-related changes in both cognition and the underlying cellular and molecular processes. As previously mentioned, zebrafish exhibit characteristics that are similar to humans, as well as other mammals, including the fact that these animals age gradually, and they demonstrate aging-related changes across both cognitive and neurobiological spectrums. It clear that both genetic and non-genetic interventions can be applied to alter the course of the aging process and provide potential drug targets that could be manipulated to ameliorate age-related cognitive declines. Therefore, this model will help researchers elucidate the biological mechanisms that underlie aging-related cognitive decline.
Statements
Author contributions
All authors listed have made a substantial, direct and intellectual contribution to the work, and approved it for publication.
Funding
This was supported by an Installation Grant from the European Molecular Biology Organization and the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK 214S236 and 215S701).
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to thank Elif Karoglu and Dilan Celebi-Birand for comments and discussions on the manuscript.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1
AdamsM. M.ShiL.LinvilleM. C.ForbesM. E.LongA. B.BennettC.et al. (2008). Caloric restriction and age affect synaptic protein levels in hippocampal CA3 and spatial learning ability. Exp. Neurol.211, 141–149. 10.1016/j.expneurol.2008.01.016
2
AmpatzisK.MakantasiP.DermonC. (2012). Cell proliferation pattern in adult zebrafish forebrain is sexually dimorphic. Neuroscience226, 367–381. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.09.022
3
AreyR. N.MurphyC. T. (2017). Conserved regulators of cognitive aging: from worms to humans. Behav. Brain Res. 322, 299–310. 10.1016/j.bbr.2016.06.035
4
Arslan-ErgulA.AdamsM. M. (2014). Gene expression changes in aging Zebrafish (Danio rerio) brains are sexually dimorphic. BMC Neuroscience15:29. 10.1186/1471-2202-15-29
5
Arslan-ErgulA.ErbabaB.KarogluE. T.HalimD. O.AdamsM. M. (2016). Short-term dietary restriction in old zebrafish changes cell senescence mechanisms. Neuroscience334, 64–75. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2016.07.033
6
BilottaJ.SaszikS. (2001). The zebrafish as a model visual system. Int. J. Dev. Neurosci. 19, 621–629. 10.1016/S0736-5748(01)00050-8
7
BlaserR. E.ViraD. G. (2014). Experiments on learning in zebrafish (Danio rerio): a promising model of neurocognitive function. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 42, 224–231. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.03.003
8
BondareffW. (1979). Synaptic atrophy in the senescent hippocampus. Mech. Ageing Dev. 9, 163–171. 10.1016/0047-6374(79)90127-1
9
BrockA. J.SudwartsA.ParkerM. O.BrennanC. H. (2017). Zebrafish behavioral models of ageing, in The rights and wrongs of zebrafish: behavioral phenotyping of zebrafish, ed KalueffA. V (Cham: Springer International Publishing), 241–258. 10.1007/978-3-319-33774-6_11
10
BrodyH. (1955). Organization of the cerebral cortex. III. A study of aging in the human cerebral cortex. J. Comp. Neurol. 102, 511–516. 10.1002/cne.901020206
11
Celebi-BirandE. D.SengulG. F.ArdicN. I.KafaligonulH.AdamsM. M. (2018). Effects of short-term caloric restriction and rapamycin on brain aging in zebrafish (Danio rerio). Anatomy12 (Suppl.1), 85. 10.2399/ana.18.001s
12
ColmanR. J.AndersonR. M.JohnsonS. C.KastmanE. K.KosmatkaK. J.BeasleyT. M.et al. (2009). Caloric restriction delays disease onset and mortality in rhesus monkeys. Science325, 201–204. 10.1126/science.1173635
13
CurcioC. A.HindsJ. W. (1983). Stability of synaptic density and spine volume in dentate gyrus of aged rats. Neurobiol. Aging4, 77–87. 10.1016/0197-4580(83)90058-1
14
DevaneyK. O.JohnsonH. A. (1980). Neuron loss in the aging visual cortex of man. J. Gerontol. 35, 836–841. 10.1093/geronj/35.6.836
15
EdelmannK.GlashauserL.SprungalaS.HeslB.FritschieM.NinkovicJ.et al. (2013). Increased radial glia quiescence, decreased reactivation upon injury and unaltered neuroblast behavior underlie decreased neurogenesis in the aging zebrafish telencephalon. J. Comp. Neurol. 521, 3099–3115. 10.1002/cne.23347
16
GeinismanY.BondareffW.DodgeJ. T. (1977). Partial deafferentation of neurons in the dentate gyrus of the senescent rat. Brain Res. 134, 541–545. 10.1016/0006-8993(77)90828-9
17
GerlaiR. (2016). Learning and memory in zebrafish (Danio rerio). Methods Cell Biol. 134, 551–58610.1016/bs.mcb.2016.02.005
18
GoriS.AgrilloC.DaddaM.BisazzaA. (2014). Do fish perceive illusory motion?Sci. Rep. 4:6443. 10.1038/srep06443
19
HaugH.EggersR. (1991). Morphometry of the human cortex cerebri and corpus striatum during aging. Neurobiol. Aging12, 336–338. 10.1016/0197-4580(91)90013-A
20
HaugM. F.BiehlmaierO.MuellerK. P.NeuhaussS. C. (2010). Visual acuity in larval zebrafish: Behavior and histology. Front. Zool. 7:8. 10.1186/1742-9994-7-8
21
HendersonG.TomlinsonB. E.GibsonP. H. (1980). Cell counts in human cerebral cortex in normal adults throughout life using an image analysing computer. J. Neurol. Sci. 46, 113–136. 10.1016/0022-510X(80)90048-9
22
HoweK.ClarkM. D.TorrojaC. F.TorranceJ.BerthelotC.MuffatoM.et al. (2013). The zebrafish reference genome sequence and its relationship to the human genome. Nature496, 498–503. 10.1038/nature12111
23
KalueffA. V.GebhardtM.StewartA. M.CachatJ. M.BrimmerM.ChawlaJ. S.et al. (2013). Towards a comprehensive catalog of zebrafish behavior 1.0 and beyond. Zebrafish10, 70–86. 10.1089/zeb.2012.0861
24
KalueffA. V.StewartA. M.GerlaiR. (2014). Zebrafish as an emerging model for studying complex brain disorders. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 35, 63–75. 10.1016/j.tips.2013.12.002
25
KarogluE. T.HalimD. O.ErkayaB.AltaytasF.Arslan-ErgulA.KonuO.et al. (2017). Aging alters the molecular dynamics of synapses in a sexually dimorphic pattern in zebrafish (Danio rerio). Neurobiol. Aging54, 10–21. 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2017.02.007
26
KarogluE. T.Tuz-SasikM. U.KaradumanA.KeskusA. G.Arslan-ErgulA.KonuO.et al. (2018). Cholinergic modulations of synaptic protein levels in male and female aged zebrafish. Anatomy12(Suppl. 1), 25. 10.2399/ana.18.001s
27
KempermannG.KuhnH. G.GageF. G. (1998). Experience-induced neurogenesis in the senescent dentate gyrus. J. Neurosci. 18, 3206–3212. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-09-03206.1998
28
KishiS.UchiyamaJ.BaughmanA. M.GotoT.LinM. C.TsaiS. B. (2003). The zebrafish as a vertebrate model of functional aging and very gradual senescence. Exp. Gerontol. 38, 777–786. 10.1016/S0531-5565(03)00108-6
29
KitamuraT.MishinaM.SugiyamaH. (2006). Dietary restriction increases hippocampal neurogenesis by molecular mechanisms independent of NMDA receptors. Neurosci. Lett. 393, 94–96. 10.1016/j.neulet.2005.08.073
30
KizilC.KaslinJ.KroehneV.BrandM. (2012). Adult neurogenesis and brain regeneration. Dev. Neurobiol. 72, 429–461. 10.1002/dneu.20918
31
LeeJ.SeroogyK. B.MattsonM. P. (2002). Dietary restriction enhances neurotrophin expression and neurogenesis in the hippocampus of adult mice. J. Neurochem. 80, 539–547. 10.1046/j.0022-3042.2001.00747.x
32
LinS. J.KaeberleinM.AndalisA. A.SturtzL. A.DefossezP. A.CulottaV. C.et al. (2002). Calorie restriction extends Saccharomyces cerevisiae lifespan by increasing respiration. Nature418, 344–348. 10.1038/nature00829
33
LuoJ.DanielsS. B.LenningtonJ. B.NottiR. Q.ConoverJ. C. (2006). The aging neurogenic subventricular zone. Aging Cell5, 139–152. 10.1111/j.1474-9726.2006.00197.x
34
NajafianM.AlerasoolN.MoshtaghianJ. (2014). The effect of motion aftereffect on optomotor response in larva and adult zebrafish. Neurosci. Lett. 559, 179–183. 10.1016/j.neulet.2013.05.072
35
NamR. H.KimW.LeeC. J. (2004). NMDA receptor-dependent long-term potentiation in the telencephalon of the zebrafish. Neurosci. Lett. 370, 248–251. 10.1016/j.neulet.2004.08.037
36
NeuhaussS. C. F. (2010). Zebrafish vision: structure and function of the zebrafish visual system, in Zebrafish, eds PerryS. F.EkerM.FarrellA. P.BraunerC. J. (London: Academic Press), 81–122.
37
NewtonI. G.ForbesM. E.LinvilleM. C.PangH.TuckerE. W.RiddleD. R.et al. (2007). Effects of aging and caloric restriction on dentate gyrus synapses and glutamate receptor subunits. Neurobiol. Aging29, 1308–1318. 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2007.03.009
38
OrgerM. B.de PolaviejaG. G. (2017). Zebrafish behavior: opportunities and challenges. Annu. Rev. Neuro. 40, 125–147. 10.1146/annurev-neuro-071714-033857
39
OrgerM. B.SmearM. C.AnstisS. M.BaierH. (2000). Perception of Fourier and non-Fourier motion by larval zebrafish. Nat. Neurosci. 3, 1128–1133. 10.1038/80649
40
OwsleyC. (2016). Vision and aging. Annu. Rev. Vis. Sci. 2, 255–271. 10.1146/annurev-vision-111815-114550
41
ParkH. R.LeeJ. (2011). Neurogenic contributions made by dietary regulation to hippocampal neurogenesis. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1229, 23–28. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06089.x
42
ParkJ. H.GlassZ.SayedK.MichurinaT. V.LazutkinA.MineyevaO.et al. (2013). Calorie restriction alleviates the age-related decrease in neural progenitor cell division in the aging brain. Eur. J. Neurosci. 37, 1987–1993. 10.1111/ejn.12249
43
ParkerM. O.BrockA. J.SudwartsA.TehM. T.CombeF. J.BrennanC. H. (2015). Developmental role of acetylcholinesterase in impulse control in zebrafish. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 9:271. 10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00271
44
PetersA.MorrisonJ. H.RoseneD. L.HymanB. T. (1998). Feature article: are neurons lost from the primate cerebral cortex during normal aging?Cereb. Cortex8, 295–300. 10.1093/cercor/8.4.295
45
PoeB. H.LinvilleC.RiddleD. R.SonntagW. E.Brunso-BechtoldJ. K. (2001). Effects of age and insulin-like growth factor-1 on neuron and synapse numbers in area CA3 of hippocampus. Neuroscience107, 231–238. 10.1016/S0306-4522(01)00341-4
46
RappP. R.GallagherM. (1996). Preserved neuron number in the hippocampus of aged rats with spatial learning deficits. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 93, 9926–9930. 10.1073/pnas.93.18.9926
47
RasmussenT.SchliemannT.SørensenJ. C.ZimmerJ.WestM. J. (1996). Memory impaired aged rats: no loss of principal hippocampal and subicular neurons. Neurobiol. Aging, 17, 143–147. 10.1016/0197-4580(95)02032-2
48
RinnerO.RickJ. M.NeuhaussS. C. (2005). Contrast sensitivity, spatial and temporal tuning of the larval zebrafish optokinetic response. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 46, 137–142. 10.1167/iovs.04-0682
49
RothG. S.IngramD. K.LaneM. A. (2001). Caloric restriction in primates and relevance to humans. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 928, 305–315. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2001.tb05660.x
50
SchmidtR.SträhleU.ScholppS. (2013). Neurogenesis in zebrafish - from embryo to adult. Neural. Dev. 8:3. 10.1186/1749-8104-8-3
51
ShiL.AdamsM. M.LinvilleM. C.NewtonI. G.ForbesM. E.LongA. B.et al. (2007). Caloric restriction eliminates the aging-related decline in NMDA and AMPA receptor subunits in the rat hippocampus and induces homeostasis. Exp. Neurol. 206, 70–79. 10.1016/j.expneurol.2007.03.026
52
ShiL.LinvilleM. C.TuckerE. W.SonntagW. E.Brunso-BechtoldJ. K. (2005). Differential effects of aging and insulin-like growth factor-1 on synapses in CA1 of rat hippocampus. Cereb. Cortex15, 571–577. 10.1093/cercor/bhh158
53
StewartA. M.BraubachO.SpitsbergenJ.GerlaiR.KalueffA. V. (2014). Zebrafish models for translational neuroscience research: from tank to bedside. Trends Neurosci. 37, 264–278. 10.1016/j.tins.2014.02.011
54
StewartA. M.KalueffA. V. (2012). The developing utility of zebrafish models for cognitive enhancers research. Curr. Neuropharmacol. 10, 263–271. 10.2174/157015912803217323
55
TappeinerC.GerberS.EnzmannV.BalmerJ.JazwinskaA.TschoppM. (2012). Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity of adult zebrafish. Front. Zool. 9:10. 10.1186/1742-9994-9-10
56
YuL.TucciV.KishiS.ZhdanovaI. V. (2006). Cognitive aging in zebrafish. PLoS ONE. 1:e14. 10.1371/journal.pone.0000014
Summary
Keywords
aging, cognition and perception, behavior, neurobiological alterations, interventions, dietary restriction
Citation
Adams MM and Kafaligonul H (2018) Zebrafish—A Model Organism for Studying the Neurobiological Mechanisms Underlying Cognitive Brain Aging and Use of Potential Interventions. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 6:135. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2018.00135
Received
09 August 2018
Accepted
25 September 2018
Published
01 November 2018
Volume
6 - 2018
Edited by
Eirini Trompouki, Max-Planck-Institut für Immunbiologie und Epigenetik, Germany
Reviewed by
Claudia Vianna Maurer-Morelli, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Brazil
Updates
Copyright
© 2018 Adams and Kafaligonul.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Michelle M. Adams michelle@bilkent.edu.tr
This article was submitted to Molecular Medicine, a section of the journal Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.