In this Research Topic entitled “Novel composites and multi-material assembly approaches for Tissue Regeneration,” we aimed to bring forth new insights and ideas from our peers who combine various materials to create complex tissue-regeneration solutions. As we wrap up this topic for now, we are happy to report that we were able to attract several interesting research studies, which generated significant new insight for our field. On composite materials, we received studies combining collagen composites with other biological factors, native extracellular matrix composites with hydrogels and cellulose-hydrogel composites among biologically sourced materials; and polymer-drug, polymer-polymer and polymer-hydrogel composites among (mostly) synthetic materials. On multi-material fabrication approaches, the papers received covered pressure based extrusion (bioprinting), composite material electrospnning, and an automated sheet rolling technique to obtain 3D constructs from electrospun films.
To highlight some of the interesting findings from this Research Topic, de Pinho et al. found a simple way to improve the wettability of electrospun polymeric scaffolds (which is important for interactions with cells) by creating a composite with alginate which could later form a hydrogel. This was done by adding alginate to the polymer solutions before the electrospinning process.
Frost et al. used cellulose nanocrystals (CNC) to increase the viscosity of light cross linkable PEGDA hydrogels enough to achieve extrusion based bioprinting, which was otherwise not possible. Their CNC-PEGDA composites showed an improvement in mechanical properties as well over the PEGDA gels alone.
While the former two studies focused on novel materials and fabrication methods, do Amaral et al. delved deeper into biological aspects to confirm that supplementing of clinically-relevant collagen-glycosaminoglycan scaffolds with platelet-rich plasma (PRP) gels provided a composite material with improved ability to attract blood vessels while maintaining a beneficial immune response.
Shamsah et al. produced poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL) and poly(L-lactic) acid (PLLA) composite electrospun fibers which had improved load bearing ability over PCL alone and then they rolled sheets of aligned fibers and cells into tubes, using an automated device, which allowed them to build 3D structures layer by layer and resembling the in vivo tissue architecture of annulus fibrosus.
Shridhar et al. removed cells from bone and adipose tissue and created composites between these cell-free extracellular matrices (ECM) and methacrylated chondritin sulfate hydrogels to study how tissue specific ECM can affect the differentiation of adipose derived stem cells. They show that tissue specific ECM can act synergistically with soluble factors to improve stem cell differentiation toward the tissue from which the ECM was sourced.
O'Leary et al. loaded a drug (all-trans retinoic acid) in electrospun chitosan coated PCL scaffolds and showed using in vitro studies how the controlled release of the drug enhanced its potential for tracheal tissue regeneration.
Thus, the topic ended up reflecting the wide diversity of this field of composite biomaterials, including composites to improve physical properties (de Pinho et al.; Frost et al.;Shamsah et al.), affecting cell behavior (do Amaral et al.;Shridhar et al.;O'Leary et al.), or enabling controlled fabrication of scaffolds (Frost et al.). Besides all papers studying material combinations with few precedents, the gradient bioprinting demonstrated by Frost et al. and the controlled alignment between layers used by Shamsah et al. indicate that the field is heading toward better control on the distribution and interaction between the materials in order to get the best out of these novel composite materials.
Finally, we (topic editors) would like to thank all the authors, guest editors and reviewers for their valuable contributions to this Research Topic.
Statements
Author contributions
RS prepared the initial draft. FO'B and SC-E reviewed and added inputs. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Summary
Keywords
composites, tissue engineering, biofabrication, multi-material, regenerative medicine
Citation
Sinha R, O'Brien FJ and Camarero-Espinosa S (2020) Editorial: Novel Composites and Multi-Material Assembly Approaches for Tissue Regeneration. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 8:680. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.00680
Received
26 May 2020
Accepted
01 June 2020
Published
14 July 2020
Volume
8 - 2020
Edited and reviewed by
Gianni Ciofani, Italian Institute of Technology (IIT), Italy
Updates
Copyright
© 2020 Sinha, O'Brien and Camarero-Espinosa.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Ravi Sinha ravi.sinha@maastrichtuniversity.nl
This article was submitted to Nanobiotechnology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.