Abstract
In many eukaryotes, cytokinesis proceeds in two successive steps: first, ingression of the cleavage furrow and second, abscission of the intercellular bridge. In animal cells, the actomyosin contractile ring is involved in the first step, while the endosomal sorting complex required for transport (ESCRT), which participates in various membrane fusion/fission events, mediates the second step. Intriguingly, in archaea, ESCRT is involved in cytokinesis, raising the hypothesis that the function of ESCRT in eukaryotic cytokinesis descended from the archaeal ancestor. In eukaryotes other than in animals, the roles of ESCRT in cytokinesis are poorly understood. To explore the primordial core mechanisms for eukaryotic cytokinesis, we investigated ESCRT functions in the unicellular red alga Cyanidioschyzon merolae that diverged early in eukaryotic evolution. C. merolae provides an excellent experimental system. The cell has a simple organelle composition. The genome (16.5 Mb, 5335 genes) has been completely sequenced, transformation methods are established, and the cell cycle is synchronized by a light and dark cycle. Similar to animal and fungal cells, C. merolae cells divide by furrowing at the division site followed by abscission of the intercellular bridge. However, they lack an actomyosin contractile ring. The proteins that comprise ESCRT-I–IV, the four subcomplexes of ESCRT, are partially conserved in C. merolae. Immunofluorescence of native or tagged proteins localized the homologs of the five ESCRT-III components [charged multivesicular body protein (CHMP) 1, 2, and 4–6], apoptosis-linked gene-2-interacting protein X (ALIX), the ESCRT-III adapter, and the main ESCRT-IV player vacuolar protein sorting (VPS) 4, to the intercellular bridge. In addition, ALIX was enriched around the cleavage furrow early in cytokinesis. When the ESCRT function was perturbed by expressing dominant-negative VPS4, cells with an elongated intercellular bridge accumulated—a phenotype resulting from abscission failure. Our results show that ESCRT mediates cytokinetic abscission in C. merolae. The fact that ESCRT plays a role in cytokinesis in archaea, animals, and early diverged alga C. merolae supports the hypothesis that the function of ESCRT in cytokinesis descended from archaea to a common ancestor of eukaryotes.
Introduction
Cytokinesis is a fundamental biological phenomenon in all organisms. However, in eukaryotes the mechanisms are diverse. A significant difference exists between a group of animals, fungi, and Amoebozoa (Amorphea; Burki, 2014) and the other groups (Excavates and Diaphoretickes) (Figure 1A). Cells of Amorphea generally divide depending on constriction of the contractile ring (Pollard, 2017; Figure 1A), whereas those of other eukaryotic groups lack myosin-II, an essential ring component (Mishra et al., 2013; Figure 1A). The mechanism of cytokinesis has varied further in each group during evolution. One example is the cytokinesis of land plants whose cells divide by developing cell walls and membranes from the cell center toward the cell periphery (Muller and Jurgens, 2016). Our current knowledge of cytokinesis mostly depends on a limited number of model organisms. However, the mechanisms in different lineages warrant exploration to reveal the eukaryotic history and the core mechanisms of cytokinesis shared by eukaryotes.
FIGURE 1
In mammalian cells, cytokinesis proceeds by equatorial membrane furrowing followed by abscission of the intercellular bridge. The contractile ring containing actomyosin and septin filaments constricts to furrow the membrane (Green et al., 2012). As the ring closes, the midbody, the platform for the abscission machinery where the plus and minus ends of spindle microtubules overlap, is formed. The actin-capping protein that controls actin polymerization is required for the process (Terry et al., 2018). The intercellular bridge contains the spindle midzone microtubules and midbody. The septin filaments are reorganized into rings in the early intercellular bridge to assist bridge maturation (Renshaw et al., 2014; Karasmanis et al., 2019).
The endosomal sorting complex required for transport (ESCRT), a protein complex conserved among eukaryotes (Table 1), contributes to various membrane fusion/fission events such as multivesicular body formation at late endosomes and nuclear envelope fusion (Campsteijn et al., 2016; Schoneberg et al., 2017). In mammalian cells, ESCRT mediates scission of the intercellular bridge (Carlton and Martin-Serrano, 2007; Morita et al., 2007; Elia et al., 2011; Guizetti et al., 2011; Campsteijn et al., 2016; Schoneberg et al., 2017). The proteins comprising ESCRT-I–IV, the four subcomplexes of ESCRT, are sequentially targeted to the midbody. ESCRT-I recruits charged multivesicular body protein (CHMP) 4 in ESCRT-III by binding to CHMP6 in ESCRT-III by itself or through ESCRT-II (Christ et al., 2016). CHMP6 is a nucleation factor for ESCRT-III. A recent study showed that Septin (SEPT) 9, a constituent of the septin ring, associates with the ESCRT-I protein tumor susceptibility gene (TSG) 101 to assist the recruitment of ESCRT-II and demarcate the sites for ESCRT-III assembly (Karasmanis et al., 2019). The septin ring disassembles as ESCRT-III machinery develops (Karasmanis et al., 2019). In addition to ESCRT-I, the ESCRT-III adaptor protein apoptosis-linked gene-2-interacting protein X (ALIX) localizes at the midbody to separately recruit CHMP4 without binding to CHMP6 (Christ et al., 2016).
TABLE 1
| Eukaryotes | Archaea | |||||
| Mammals | Saccharomyces | C. merolae | Sulfolobus | Sulfolobus | Asgard | |
| cerevisiae | acidocaldarius | islandicus | archaea | |||
| ESCRT-I | TSG101 | Vps23 | TSG101/CMK136C | + (Steadiness box) | ||
| VPS28* | Vps28 | VPS28/CMN120C | + | |||
| VPS37A–D | Vps37 | - | ||||
| MVB12A, B | Mvb12 | - | ||||
| ESCRT-II | EAP20 | Vps25 | EAP20/CMM195C | + | ||
| EAP30* | Vps22 | EAP30/CMO296C | + (Vps22/36-like) | |||
| EAP45 | Vps36 | - | ||||
| ESCRT-III | CHMP1A, B | Did2/Vps46 | CHMP1/CMQ376C | CHMP-like: | CHMP-like: | + (Vps2/24/46-like) |
| CHMP1/CMR340C | CdvB, | ESCRT-III, | ||||
| CHMP2A, B | Vps2 | CHMP2/CMB008C | Saci_0451, | ESCRT-III-1, | ||
| CHMP3 | Vps24 | - | Saci_1416, | ESCRT-III-2, | ||
| CHMP4A-C | Vps32/Snf7 | CHMP4/CMI044C | Saci_1601 | ESCRT-III-3 | + (Vps20/32/60-like) | |
| CHMP5 | Vps60 | CHMP5/VIG1/CML153C | ||||
| CHMP6 | Vps20 | CHMP6/CMQ184C | ||||
| CHMP7 | - | - | ||||
| IST1 | Ist1 | - | ||||
| ESCRT-IV | VPS4A, B | Vps4 | VPS4/CMO281C | Vps4/CdvC | Vps4/CdvC | + |
| LIP5 | Vta1 | LIP5/CMI268C | ||||
| ALIX | ALIX | Bro1 | ALIX/CMC051C | + (Bro1 domain) | ||
| CdvA | - | - | - | CdvA | CdvA | |
Major ESCRT and ESCRT-associated proteins in eukaryotes and archaea.
The list of proteins in mammals and S. cerevisiae excluding CdvA is based on Schuh and Audhya (2014). In the C. merolae genome, ESCRT and ALIX homologs were searched by BLAST using S. cerevisiae sequences as queries. The results for ESCRT homologs were consistent with those of Leung et al. (2008). CdvA homologs in eukaryotes were searched by BLAST using the S. acidocaldarius sequence as a query. “−” no detectable homologs. The information of Sulfolobus is based on Lindas et al. (2008); Samson et al. (2008), and Liu et al. (2017). Both Sulfolobus species have four CHMP family proteins. It is unclear which eukaryotic CHMP protein is the closest. “+” indicates that the homologous sequence is present in the genomes of “Asgard” archaea, the group proposed to be the closest to eukaryotes (Zaremba-Niedzwiedzka et al., 2017). Blank indicates that the protein or gene is not mentioned in the above results. Underlined proteins localize at the midbody or intercellular bridge (mammals) or between daughter nucleoids (Sulfolobus). The references are in this legend or the text. ∗VPS28 and EAP30 are required for midbody localization of TSG101 and EAP20, respectively (Christ et al., 2016). Proteins in bold font were examined in this study.
ESCRT-III consists of CHMP family proteins, which are homologous to each other, and increased sodium tolerance (IST) 1 (Table 1). They are coiled-coil proteins suggested to polymerize into spiral filaments beneath the intercellular bridge membrane to narrow abscission sites adjacent to the midbody (Guizetti et al., 2011; Mierzwa et al., 2017; Goliand et al., 2018). ESCRT-III also recruits the microtubule-severing enzyme spastin (Yang et al., 2008; Connell et al., 2009). The intercellular bridge is cleaved after the arrival of vacuolar protein sorting (VPS) 4, the AAA-ATPase in ESCRT-IV, which regulates the turnover of ESCRT-III assembly (Carlton and Martin-Serrano, 2007; Morita et al., 2007; Elia et al., 2011; Schuh and Audhya, 2014; Mierzwa et al., 2017).
ESCRT possibly represents conserved machinery in eukaryotic cytokinesis inherited from the archaeal ancestor. In Sulfolobus, a thermophile archaeon, homologs of ESCRT-III proteins and VPS4, and the ESCRT-III scaffold cell division protein (Cdv) A are detected between daughter nucleoids of dividing cells, correlating with the site of membrane ingression (Table 1; Lindas et al., 2008; Samson et al., 2008, 2011; Liu et al., 2017). They are necessary for cytokinesis from early to final stages. Whereas ESCRT-dependent cytokinesis is not universal in archaea (Makarova et al., 2010), recent studies support that eukaryotes have diverged from archaea encoding ESCRT (Zaremba-Niedzwiedzka et al., 2017; Table 1). However, in eukaryotes other than in animals, whether ESCRT mediates cytokinetic abscission is poorly understood. In the land plant Arabidopsis thaliana, elc mutation, a mutation of TSG101, results in the production of multinucleated cells (Spitzer et al., 2006). Although the mechanism underlying induction of the phenotype is unclear, it may reflect conserved functions of ESCRT in eukaryotic cytokinetic abscission. Some similarities between the animal midbody and plant phragmoplasts, arrays of microtubules on the division plane, have been indicated in a previous study (Otegui et al., 2005).
Because ESCRT is a conserved multifunctional complex, the presence of ESCRT genes in the genome does not necessarily suggest its involvement in cytokinesis. To determine whether ESCRT is primordial core machinery for eukaryotic cytokinesis, we explored ESCRT functions in the acidothermophilic unicellular red alga Cyanidioschyzon merolae that branched early in eukaryotic evolution (Yoon et al., 2004, 2006). In addition to the phylogenetical position, C. merolae provides an excellent experimental system. The cell (∼2 μm in diameter) has a simple structure (Kuroiwa, 1998). The genome (16.5 Mb, 5335 genes) has been completely sequenced (Matsuzaki et al., 2004; Nozaki et al., 2007). Genetic transformation is feasible (Ohnuma et al., 2008; Fujiwara et al., 2013), and a light and dark cycle highly synchronizes cell cycle progression and thus the timing of cytokinesis in a population (Suzuki et al., 1994; Supplementary Figure S1A).
Unlike other algae and plants, C. merolae does not have a rigid cell wall. It divides through membrane furrowing at the equator (constriction stage) that takes several minutes, followed by scission of the intercellular bridge (abscission stage), a stage that completes within a minute (Figure 1B; Supplementary Figures S1A,B). C. merolae lacks the actomyosin contractile ring and septins (Figure 1A). The actin gene does not seem to be expressed in C. merolae, and staining with phalloidin, which detects F-actin, is negative (Suzuki et al., 1995; Takahashi et al., 1995; Matsuzaki et al., 2004). Moreover, no myosin heavy chain gene or septin genes are present in the C. merolae genome (Matsuzaki et al., 2004). The only protein that has been linked to C. merolae cytokinesis is elongation factor (EF) 1α, which accumulates at the cleavage furrow (Figure 1B, Supplementary Figure S2; Imoto et al., 2011), as observed in Tetrahymena (Numata et al., 2000) and sea urchin eggs (Fujimoto and Mabuchi, 2010). Sea urchin EF1α bundles actin filaments and maintains the contractile ring structure (Fujimoto and Mabuchi, 2010). However, in C. merolae, actin filaments are probably absent and thus the function of EF1α in cytokinesis is unclear.
In this study, we investigated localization of ESCRT proteins in C. merolae by immunofluorescence and examined the effects of a dominant-negative mutant of VPS4 on cytokinesis. Five homologs of ESCRT-III proteins (CHMP1, CHMP2, and CHMP4–6), ALIX, and VPS4 localized at the intercellular bridge before cytokinetic abscission. ALIX also located close to the cleavage furrow early in the constriction stage. The expression of mutant VPS4 caused abscission failure, indicating that ESCRT mediates cytokinetic abscission in C. merolae.
Results
The C. merolae genome encodes homologs for 11 ESCRT proteins and ALIX (Table 1). We refer to these homologs according to the names of mammalian proteins except for the homolog of mammalian CHMP5, CHMP5/VIG1 (Vacuolar inheritance gene 1), which was previously characterized in C. merolae (Fujiwara et al., 2010; Yagisawa et al., 2018). To understand ESCRT functions in cytokinesis, we first examined the localization of ESCRT-III, the structure most directly involved in membrane deformation. We labeled CHMP2 using specific antibodies (Supplementary Figure S3A). In a synchronized culture under a light-dark cycle, the protein was expressed throughout the cell cycle with an increased level during the dark period (Supplementary Figure S3B). Immunofluorescence showed that CHMP2 localized on the punctate cytoplasmic structures and intercellular bridge of cytokinesis (Figure 2A). Next, we examined whether other ESCRT-III components localize with CHMP2 at the intercellular bridge using strains that ectopically expressed proteins fused to hemagglutinin (HA)-tags. C. merolae encodes two CHMP1 homologs (CMR340C and CMQ376C; Table 1). CHMP1-HA (CMR340C) localized at the intercellular bridge with CHMP2 (Figure 2B). CHMP1-HA (CMQ376C) was not expressed consistently with the lack of the expressed sequence tag (EST) of the native gene (data not shown; Matsuzaki et al., 2004). CHMP4-HA, CHMP5/VIG1-HA, and CHMP6-HA localized at the intercellular bridge with CHMP2 (Figure 2B).
FIGURE 2
To further examine the involvement of ESCRT in C. merolae cytokinesis, we detected the localization TSG101, a major component of ESCRT-I, and ALIX. TSG101-HA was detected on the cytoplasmic puncta, but not on the intercellular bridge (Figure 3A). Although we also tested N-terminally tagged HA-TSG101, it was not expressed (data not shown). In contrast to TSG101, FLAG-tagged ALIX localized to the intercellular bridge (Figure 3B and Supplementary Figures S4A,B). During early constriction, ALIX-FLAG also located around the cleavage furrow (Figures 3C,D and Supplementary Figures S4A,B). The signals partially overlapped with those of EF1α (Figures 3C,D). In the other stages (G1, M, and late constriction), ALIX-FLAG was mainly localized close to the cell membrane and on some cytoplasmic structures (Supplementary Figures S4A,B).
FIGURE 3
Our attempts to knock out some ESCRT genes were unsuccessful, suggesting that ESCRT disruption is lethal in C. merolae. An ATPase-inactive dominant-negative mutant of VPS4 blocks cytokinetic abscission in mammalian cells (Carlton and Martin-Serrano, 2007; Morita et al., 2007). To further clarify the role of ESCRT in cytokinesis, we expressed the corresponding mutant VPS4 (E292Q) in C. merolae cells.
When expressed under control of the native promoter sequence, VPS4-HA localized on the intercellular bridge (Figure 4A). To assess the effect of the mutation on cytokinesis, wild-type (WT) or the mutant (E292Q) VPS4-HA were expressed under the control of a heat-inducible promoter in the synchronized culture. The cells were subjected to heat treatments at the beginning of the dark period (G2/M phase, as shown in Figures 1B, 4B,C). VPS4WT-HA cells completed cell division in 12 h after the onset of heat shock, which was similar to untreated cells (Figures 4D,E). In contrast, induction of VPS4E292Q-HA accumulated cells with notably elongated intercellular bridges (Figures 4D,F–H). Most of these long intercellular bridges were spanned by the spindle (Figure 5A) and positive for VPS4E292Q-HA and CHMP2 (Figure 5B).
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 5
Discussion
ESCRT potentially represents a component of the most ancient conserved machinery for cytokinetic abscission in eukaryotes. However, little is known about such ESCRT functions in eukaryotes other than in animals. In this study, we revealed that ESCRT is an essential component for cytokinetic abscission in C. merolae, an early diverged eukaryote.
We found that five ESCRT-III proteins, CHMP1 (CMR340C), CHMP2, CHMP4, CHMP5/VIG1, and CHMP6, localized at the intercellular bridge of C. merolae (Figures 6A,B). In mammalian cells, CHMP1–6, including its isoforms (Carlton and Martin-Serrano, 2007; Morita et al., 2007, 2010; Dukes et al., 2008; Yang et al., 2008; Bajorek et al., 2009; Elia et al., 2011; Guizetti et al., 2011; Carlton et al., 2012; Goliand et al., 2014; Christ et al., 2016), and IST1 (Agromayor et al., 2009; Goliand et al., 2018) localize at the midbody. C. merolae is devoid of genes encoding CHMP3 and IST1. In addition, ESCRT-III genes, except for CHMP1, exist as a single copy. Thus, ESCRT-III machinery in C. merolae is simpler in terms of protein composition. Electron microscopy has shown that mammalian ESCRT-III proteins either form or assist in forming a spiral of 17 nm-diameter filaments underlying the intercellular bridge membrane (Guizetti et al., 2011; Mierzwa et al., 2017; Schoneberg et al., 2017). The identification of such a structure is challenging in C. merolae because of the short duration of the abscission stage and small size of the intercellular bridge. Thus, further extensive studies are required to elucidate the structure involved in cytokinetic abscission.
FIGURE 6
C. merolae TSG101 appeared to be absent from the intercellular bridge. Mammalian ESCRT-I and ALIX localize at the midbody to separately target ESCRT-III (Christ et al., 2016). ESCRT-I depends on CHMP6 to recruit other ESCRT-III proteins, whereas the ALIX route does not (Christ et al., 2016). C. merolae CHMP6 resided at the intercellular bridge (Figures 6A,B). Thus, it potentially has a role unrelated to ESCRT-I. ESCRT-I is found in all major eukaryotic taxa but was secondarily lost in some species (Williams and Urbe, 2007; Leung et al., 2008). Although we cannot completely rule out the possibility that the addition of epitope-tags altered the localization of the protein or that the antibody could not react with the protein because of poor accessibility, the absence of TSG101 from the intercellular bridge may suggest a major role of ALIX in recruiting ESCRT-III. In mammalian cells, both ESCRT-I and ALIX are recruited by centrosome protein 55 kDa (CEP55), a midbody protein. However, CEP55 is absent in C. elegans and Drosophila melanogaster, although they depend on ESCRT for cytokinetic abscission (Green et al., 2013; Lie-Jensen et al., 2019). In Drosophila, ALIX is recruited to the midbody by Pavarotti, a homolog of human mitotic kinesin-like protein (MKLP) 1 (Lie-Jensen et al., 2019). In C. merolae, CEP55 or MKLP1 homologs have not been found. Thus, upstream mechanisms to recruit ESCRT appear to vary among organisms.
In contrast to TSG101, C. merolae ALIX was enriched at the intercellular bridge (Figures 6A,B). We also detected ALIX around the cleavage furrow early in the constriction stage (Figure 6A). Of related interest is CdvA, a scaffold protein for ESCRT-III in the archaea Sulfolobus (Lindas et al., 2008; Samson et al., 2011). It localizes to the mid-region of the cell, corresponding to membrane ingression sites from the beginning to final stages of cell division. The localization precedes that of ESCRT-III (Samson et al., 2011). Because C. merolae and eukaryotes other than Amorphea lack the actomyosin contractile ring, understanding the role of ALIX or ESCRT in the constriction stage would be of interest for future study.
We found that VPS4 localized to the intercellular bridge (Figures 6A,B). The phenotype of cells expressing VPS4E292Q-HA was strikingly similar to that observed after overexpression of VPS4, either WT or dominant-negative forms (Carlton and Martin-Serrano, 2007; Morita et al., 2007), or disruption of spastin (Connell et al., 2009) in mammalian cells. This phenotype is also reminiscent of that in the archaea Sulfolobus overexpressing truncated ESCRT-III proteins, which exhibit long intercellular bridges (Liu et al., 2017). Therefore, C. merolae VPS4 plays a pivotal role in scission of the intercellular bridge, as seen in these organisms. C. merolae VPS4E292Q-HA resided with CHMP2 on the long intercellular bridge, suggesting that the dynamics of ESCRT-III regulated by the AAA-ATPase activity of VPS4 are critical for cytokinetic abscission in this organism.
Finally, our data indicate that ESCRT mediates cytokinetic abscission in eukaryotic cells that lack the contractile ring and septins, and in the eukaryotic intercellular bridge that is considerably smaller than that of mammalian cells. In mammalian cells, the contractile ring is required for midbody formation (Hu et al., 2012). The polymerization state of actin controls midbody maturation which is essential for the appropriate assembly of ESCRT-III (Terry et al., 2018). The clearance of F-actin from the intercellular bridge after the furrow closure is also a limiting step in ESCRT-III recruitment (Fremont et al., 2016). Septins function in both the contractile ring and intercellular bridge. They are essential for maturation and stabilization of the intercellular bridge as well as proper ESCRT-III assembly (Renshaw et al., 2014; Addi et al., 2018; Karasmanis et al., 2019). The inhibitory effects of F-actin on ESCRT-III recruitment, and the role of septins in ESCRT-III assembly may be confined to animals or eukaryotic groups in which cell division is dependent on the contractile ring. The mammalian midbody is >1 μm in diameter (Mullins and Biesele, 1977; Green et al., 2012), and ESCRT-III is targeted for >40 min before abscission (Stoten and Carlton, 2018). However, in C. merolae, the intercellular bridge is ∼200 nm in diameter and requires less than 1 min to be cleaved (Supplementary Figure S1B). Thus, C. merolae appears to control cytokinetic abscission more simply than in mammalian cells. Importantly, regardless of these differences and the phylogenetic distance, ESCRT components mediate cytokinetic abscission in these organisms.
In summary, we demonstrate that five ESCRT-III proteins, ALIX, and VPS4 localize at abscission sites to mediate cytokinetic abscission in C. merolae. We also show that ESCRT functions in cytokinesis of an organism that lacks the contractile ring and septins. The fact that ESCRT mediates cytokinesis in archaea, animals, and the early diverged red alga C. merolae supports the idea that ESCRT is the primordial machinery for cytokinetic abscission in eukaryotes. We expect that exploring other lineages of eukaryotes that undergo ESCRT-mediated cytokinetic abscission and characterization of their mechanisms should further advance our understanding of the conserved mechanisms and evolution of eukaryotic cytokinesis.
Materials and Methods
Cell Culture
C. merolae wildtype (10D; Toda et al., 1998) and transformant cells were grown in MA2 medium (Ohnuma et al., 2008) at 30°C under continuous light (30 μE⋅m–2⋅s–1). To synchronize cell division, the cells (OD750 = 2–6) were diluted to OD750 = 0.4 in 2 × Allen’s medium (Allen, 1959) and subjected to a 12 h light (100 μE⋅m–2⋅s–1)/12 h dark cycle at 42°C with bubbling air (300 ml/min). Heat treatments were applied by shifting the synchronized culture to 50°C.
Strain Generation
The primers and plasmids used to generate strains are listed in Supplementary Table S1. All strains except for the ALIX-FLAG strain were generated by integration of DNA fragments into the upstream region of the URA5.3 gene (Fujiwara et al., 2015). To add tags to ESCRT proteins, plasmids containing transformation cassettes, which included the upstream (-2300 to -898 bp) of the URA5.3 gene (CMK046C), genes encoding ESCRT proteins with their promoter region, 3 × HA-tag, the 3′ UTR of β-tubulin, and the URA5.3 gene with the promoter region, were generated using an In-Fusion HD Cloning kit (Clontech). For CHMP2-, CHMP4-, and CHMP5/VIG1-HA, PCR products #1, #5 and one of #2–#4 (Supplementary Table S1) were used. For other ESCRT proteins, PCR products #6 and one of #7–#11 were used. Plasmids containing a heat shock promoter (Sumiya et al., 2014) and VPS4-HA were generated by fusing PCR products #12 and #13 using the In-Fusion HD cloning kit. The plasmid for dominant-negative VPS4-HA (E292Q; a mutation in conserved Walker B motif; Hanson and Whiteheart, 2005) was prepared by In-Fusion cloning of PCR product #14. Transformation of C. merolae was conducted as described previously (Ohnuma et al., 2008; Fujiwara et al., 2015). Briefly, the M4 strain (a point mutant of URA5.3; Minoda et al., 2004) was transformed with PCR-amplified cassettes from each plasmid (#15) using a polyethylene glycol-mediated method. The transformants were selected for uracil independence in starch placed on solidified MA2 medium (Fujiwara et al., 2013). Establishment of the strain ALIX-FLAG was performed following the procedures of Takemura et al., 2019a. PCR products #16 and #17, corresponding to the 3′-portion (from + 997 to + 2496, where +1 is the first base position of the initiation codon) and the 3′-downstream region (from +2497 to +3996) of the CMC051C (ALIX) ORF, respectively, were inserted into StuI-digested pMKTf (Takemura et al., 2018) to construct the plasmid pMKTf-ALIX-Tagging. Subsequently, transformation cassette #18 was amplified from pMKTf-ALIX-Tagging by PCR and used to transform the uracil-auxotroph T1 strain (Taki et al., 2015) as described previously (Takemura et al., 2019a). Transformants were selected on uracil-free MA2 plates using the top starch method as described previously (Takemura et al., 2019b).
Generation of an Antibody Against C. merolae CHMP2
DNA fragments encoding the CMB008C and pQE80 expression vector (Qiagen) were amplified by PCR with the primers listed in Supplementary Table S2. The fragments were fused and circularized using the In-Fusion HD cloning kit, resulting in a construct containing the six-histidine tag at the N-terminus of CMB008C. The recombinant proteins were purified with His-Trap columns (GE Healthcare Life Sciences) and used to raise antibodies in rats (T. K. craft, Ltd.).
Time-Lapse Imaging
A synchronized culture at M phase was mounted on coverslips, which had pieces of surgical tape at the corners, and was then incubated for 30 min at room temperature. After removing excess medium, the coverslips were inverted and placed in glass-bottom dishes. The dishes were transferred into a chamber for live imaging (BZ-H3XD; Keyence) at 40°C. Images were obtained under a microscope (BZ-X700; Keyence) using a ×100 objective.
Microscopy
For immunofluorescence, cells were fixed with methanol containing 1% formaldehyde and 10% DMSO at −20°C overnight. The fixed cells were centrifuged at 1500 × g at 4°C, washed once with cold methanol (−20°C), and then twice with PBS. For blocking, the cells were treated with either Blocking One (Nakarai Tesque) for 15 min at 4°C or 5% BSA for 30 min at 37°C. The antibody reaction was performed for 1 h at 4°C. Primary antibodies were diluted in PBS and used at the following dilutions: 1:500 for rat anti-CHMP2, 1:100 for rabbit anti-α-tubulin (Fujiwara et al., 2009), 1:500 for guinea pig anti-EF1α (Imoto et al., 2011), 1:1000 for mouse anti-HA (Clone 16B12; BioLegend), and 1:1000 for mouse anti-DYKDDDDK tag (to detect FLAG-tag; Clone 1E6; Wako). Fluorescent secondary antibodies (Thermo Fisher Scientific) were diluted in PBS and applied at 1:1000 for Alexa Fluor 488 and 1:100 for Alexa Fluor 555. DNA was stained with 1 μg/ml 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI). Images were acquired under the BZ-X700 fluorescence microscope using the × 100 objective. For Alexa Fluor 488, the GFP filter was used. The emission filter of the TRITC filter was changed to XF3022 (580DF30; Omega Optical) for Alexa Fluor 555 to avoid signals of chloroplast autofluorescence. To analyze the length of intercellular bridges, cells were fixed with 1% glutaraldehyde and imaged under the BZ-X700 microscope using the × 100 objective. The length was measured using ImageJ software (Schneider et al., 2012). For Figure 4D, cells were fixed with 1% glutaraldehyde and stained with 1 μg/ml DAPI. Images were obtained under a fluorescence microscope (BX51; Olympus) with a × 40 objective and CCD camera (C7780, Hamamatsu Photonics). The following filter sets were used: U-MWU2 (Olympus) for DAPI and U-MWIG2 (Olympus) for chloroplast autofluorescence. Heat maps of the signal intensities were generated in Image Lab software (Bio-Rad). All images were adjusted for contrast using Photoshop software (Adobe Systems).
Immunoblotting
C. merolae cells were collected by centrifugation at 1500 × g at room temperature. The cell pellets were resuspended in 2 × SDS sample buffer (100 μm Tris, pH 6.8, 12% 2-mercaptoethanol, 4% SDS, and 20% glycerol) and incubated for 3 min at 95°C. After centrifugation at 15000 × g for 5 min at 4°C, the protein concentration in the supernatant was measured using an XL-Bradford kit (Aproscience). Total proteins (5 μg) were separated on polyacrylamide gels and then transferred to PVDF membranes. The membranes were blocked with 5% dry skim milk. The antibodies were diluted in 5% dry skim milk and used at the following dilutions: rat anti-CHMP2 (1:10000 for Supplementary Figure S3A and 1:2000 for Supplementary Figure S3B), rabbit anti-H3S10Ph (1:2000; Merk-Millipore), and mouse anti-HA (1:5000; Clone 16B12, BioLegend). Secondary antibodies were HRP-conjugated anti-rat, anti-rabbit, or anti-mouse IgG (1:20000; Thermo Fisher scientific). The signals were detected using ECL Prime (GE Healthcare) and the imaging system ImageQuant LAS-4000mini (for Supplementary Figure S3B; GE Healthcare) or ChemiDoc Touch (Bio-Rad).
Statements
Data availability statement
The datasets generated for this study are available on reasonable request to the corresponding author.
Author contributions
FY and TF formulated the concept, designed the study, performed the experiments, analyzed and interpreted the data, and drafted the manuscript. TT, YK, and NS performed the experiments, analyzed and interpreted the data, and drafted the manuscript. NS performed the experiments and interpreted the data. SN, YI, OM, and KT designed the study and interpreted the data. SM, HK, and TK contributed to the concept, designed the study, interpreted the data, and drafted the manuscript.
Funding
This study was supported by MEXT/JSPS KAKENHI 15H06520, 16K14770, and 19K06742 (to FY), 17K07439 (to YK), 18K06300 (to TF), and 19H03260 (to TK and FY), NIG-JOINT 2016-A1-4, 8A2017, 7A2018, and 31A2019 (to FY), and the University of the Ryukyus Research Project Promotion Grant for Women Researchers (to FY).
Acknowledgments
We thank Ms. K. Hashimoto and Y. Tanaka of the Miyagishima laboratory for technical support. We are grateful to Dr. Keiji Nishida (Kobe University), Dr. Mio Ohnuma (National Institute of technology, Hiroshima College), Dr. Takema Sasaki (National Institute of Genetics), and Dr. Yoshihisa Oda (National Institute of Genetics) for helpful advice during the study. We also thank the Biomaterials Analysis Division, Tokyo Institute of Technology, for DNA sequencing analysis. Fluorescence microscopy using the Keyence BZ-X700 was performed at the Center for Strategic Research Project of the University of the Ryukyus. We thank Mitchell Arico from Edanz Group for assistance in editing a draft of this manuscript.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcell.2020.00169/full#supplementary-material
References
1
AddiC.BaiJ.EchardA. (2018). Actin, microtubule, septin and ESCRT filament remodeling during late steps of cytokinesis.Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.5027–34. 10.1016/j.ceb.2018.01.007
2
AgromayorM.CarltonJ. G.PhelanJ. P.MatthewsD. R.CarlinL. M.Ameer-BegS.et al (2009). Essential role of hIST1 in cytokinesis.Mol. Biol. Cell201374–1387. 10.1091/mbc.E08-05-0474
3
AllenM. B. (1959). Studies with Cyanidium caldarium, an anomalously pigmented Chlorophyta.Arch. Microbiol.32270–277. 10.1007/bf00409348
4
BajorekM.MoritaE.SkalickyJ. J.MorhamS. G.BabstM.SundquistW. I. (2009). Biochemical analyses of human IST1 and its function in cytokinesis.Mol. Biol. Cell201360–1373. 10.1091/mbc.E08-05-0475
5
BurkiF. (2014). The eukaryotic tree of life from a global phylogenomic perspective.Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol.6:a016147. 10.1101/cshperspect.a016147
6
CampsteijnC.VietriM.StenmarkH. (2016). Novel ESCRT functions in cell biology, spiraling out of control?Curr Opin Cell Biol.411–8. 10.1016/j.ceb.2016.03.008
7
CarltonJ. G.CaballeA.AgromayorM.KlocM.Martin-SerranoJ. (2012). ESCRT-III governs the aurora B-mediated abscission checkpoint through CHMP4C.Science336220–225. 10.1126/science.1217180
8
CarltonJ. G.Martin-SerranoJ. (2007). Parallels between cytokinesis and retroviral budding, a role for the ESCRT machinery.Science3161908–1912. 10.1126/science.1143422
9
CarvalhoA.DesaiA.OegemaK. (2009). Structural memory in the contractile ring makes the duration of cytokinesis independent of cell size.Cell137926–937. 10.1016/j.cell.2009.03.021
10
ChristL.WenzelE. M.LiestolK.RaiborgC.CampsteijnC.StenmarkH. (2016). ALIX and ESCRT-I/II function as parallel ESCRT-III recruiters in cytokinetic abscission.J. Cell Biol.212499–513. 10.1083/jcb.201507009
11
ConnellJ. W.LindonC.LuzioJ. P.ReidE. (2009). Spastin couples microtubule severing to membrane traffic in completion of cytokinesis and secretion.Traffic1042–56. 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2008.00847.x
12
CrossF. R.UmenJ. G. (2015). The chlamydomonas cell cycle.Plant J.82370–392. 10.1111/tpj.12795
13
DukesJ. D.RichardsonJ. D.SimmonsR.WhitleyP. (2008). A dominant-negative ESCRT-III protein perturbs cytokinesis and trafficking to lysosomes.Biochem. J.411233–239. 10.1042/bj20071296
14
EliaN.SougratR.SpurlinT. A.HurleyJ. H.Lippincott-SchwartzJ. (2011). Dynamics of endosomal sorting complex required for transport (ESCRT) machinery during cytokinesis and its role in abscission.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.1084846–4851. 10.1073/pnas.1102714108
15
FremontS.HammichH.BaiJ.WiolandH.KlinkertK.RocancourtM.et al (2016). Oxidation of F-actin controls the terminal steps of cytokinesis.Nat. Commun.8:14528. 10.1038/ncomms14528
16
FujimotoH.MabuchiI. (2010). Elongation factors are involved in cytokinesis of sea urchin eggs.Genes Cells15123–135. 10.1111/j.1365-2443.2009.01370.x
17
FujiwaraT.KanesakiY.HirookaS.EraA.SumiyaN.YoshikawaH.et al (2015). A nitrogen source-dependent inducible and repressible gene expression system in the red alga Cyanidioschyzon merolae.Front. Plant Sci.6:657. 10.3389/fpls.2015.00657
18
FujiwaraT.KuroiwaH.YagisawaF.OhnumaM.YoshidaY.YoshidaM.et al (2010). The coiled-coil protein VIG1 is essential for tethering vacuoles to mitochondria during vacuole inheritance of Cyanidioschyzon merolae.Plant Cell22772–781. 10.1105/tpc.109.070227
19
FujiwaraT.OhnumaM.YoshidaM.KuroiwaT.HiranoT. (2013). Gene targeting in the red alga Cyanidioschyzon merolae, single- and multi-copy insertion using authentic and chimeric selection markers.PLoS One8:e73608. 10.1371/journal.pone.0073608
20
FujiwaraT.YoshidaY.KuroiwaT. (2009). Synchronization of cell nuclear, mitochondrial and chloroplast divisions in the unicellular red alga Cyanidioschyzon merolae.Cytologia74:1.
21
Garcia-SalcedoJ. A.Perez-MorgaD.GijonP.DilbeckV.PaysE.NolanD. P. (2004). A differential role for actin during the life cycle of Trypanosoma brucei.EMBO J.23780–789. 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600094
22
GoliandI.Adar-LevorS.SegalI.NachmiasD.DadoshT.KozlovM. M.et al (2018). Resolving ESCRT-III spirals at the intercellular bridge of dividing cells using 3D STORM.Cell Rep.241756–1764. 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.07.051
23
GoliandI.NachmiasD.GershonyO.EliaN. (2014). Inhibition of ESCRT-II-CHMP6 interactions impedes cytokinetic abscission and leads to cell death.Mol. Biol. Cell253740–3748. 10.1091/mbc.E14-08-1317
24
GreenR. A.MayersJ. R.WangS.LewellynL.DesaiA.AudhyaA.et al (2013). The midbody ring scaffolds the abscission machinery in the absence of midbody microtubules.J. Cell Biol.203505–520. 10.1083/jcb.201306036
25
GreenR. A.PaluchE.OegemaK. (2012). Cytokinesis in animal cells.Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol.2829–58. 10.1146/annurev-cellbio-101011-155718
26
GuizettiJ.SchermellehL.MantlerJ.MaarS.PoserI.LeonhardtH.et al (2011). Cortical constriction during abscission involves helices of ESCRT-III-dependent filaments.Science3311616–1620. 10.1126/science.1201847
27
HansonP. I.WhiteheartS. W. (2005). AAA+ proteins, have engine, will work.Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.6519–529. 10.1038/nrm1684
28
HensonJ. H.DitzlerC. E.GermainA.IrwinP. M.VogtE. T.YangS.et al (2017). The ultrastructural organization of actin and myosin II filaments in the contractile ring, new support for an old model of cytokinesis.Mol. Biol. Cell28613–623. 10.1091/mbc.E16-06-0466
29
HoseinR. E.WilliamsS. A.HayeK.GavinR. H. (2003). Expression of GFP-actin leads to failure of nuclear elongation and cytokinesis in Tetrahymena thermophila.J. Eukaryot. Microbiol.50403–408. 10.1111/j.1550-7408.2003.tb00261.x
30
HuC. K.CoughlinM.MitchisonT. J. (2012). Midbody assembly and its regulation during cytokinesis.Mol. Biol. Cell231024–1034. 10.1091/mbc.E11-08-0721
31
ImotoY.NishidaK.YagisawaF.YoshidaY.OhnumaM.YoshidaM.et al (2011). Involvement of elongation factor-1α in cytokinesis without actomyosin contractile ring in the primitive red alga Cyanidioschyzon merolae.Cytologia76431–437. 10.1508/cytologia.76.431
32
IwakiT.OnishiM.IkeuchiM.KitaA.SugiuraR.Giga-HamaY.et al (2007). Essential roles of class E Vps proteins for sorting into multivesicular bodies in Schizosaccharomyces pombe.Microbiology1532753–2764. 10.1099/mic.0.2007/006072-0
33
KarasmanisE. P.HwangD.NakosK.BowenJ. R.AngelisD.SpiliotisE. T. (2019). A septin double ring controls the spatiotemporal organization of the escrt machinery in cytokinetic abscission.Curr. Biol.292174–2182. 10.1016/j.cub.2019.05.050
34
KuroiwaT. (1998). The primitive red algae Cyanidium caldarium and Cyanidioschyzon merolae as model system for investigating the dividing apparatus of mitochondria and plastids.Bioessays20344–354. 10.1002/(sici)1521-1878(199804)20:4<344::aid-bies11>3.0.co;2-2
35
LeungK. F.DacksJ. B.FieldM. C. (2008). Evolution of the multivesicular body ESCRT machinery; retention across the eukaryotic lineage.Traffic91698–1716. 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2008.00797.x
36
Lie-JensenA.IvanauskieneK.MalerodL.JainA.TanK. W.LaerdahlJ. K.et al (2019). Centralspindlin recruits ALIX to the midbody during cytokinetic abscission in drosophila via a mechanism analogous to virus budding.Curr. Biol.293538–3548. 10.1016/j.cub.2019.09.025
37
LindasA. C.KarlssonE. A.LindgrenM. T.EttemaT. J.BernanderR. (2008). A unique cell division machinery in the Archaea.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.10518942–18946. 10.1073/pnas.0809467105
38
LiuJ.GaoR.LiC.NiJ.YangZ.ZhangQ.et al (2017). Functional assignment of multiple ESCRT-III homologs in cell division and budding in Sulfolobus islandicus.Mol. Microbiol.105540–553. 10.1111/mmi.13716
39
MakarovaK. S.YutinN.BellS. D.KooninE. V. (2010). Evolution of diverse cell division and vesicle formation systems in Archaea.Nat. Rev. Microbiol.8731–741. 10.1038/nrmicro2406
40
MatsuzakiM.MisumiO.ShinI. T.MaruyamaS.TakaharaM.MiyagishimaS. Y.et al (2004). Genome sequence of the ultrasmall unicellular red alga Cyanidioschyzon merolae 10D.Nature428653–657. 10.1038/nature02398
41
MierzwaB. E.ChiaruttiniN.Redondo-MorataL.von FilseckJ. M.KonigJ.LariosJ.et al (2017). Dynamic subunit turnover in ESCRT-III assemblies is regulated by Vps4 to mediate membrane remodelling during cytokinesis.Nat. Cell Biol.19787–798. 10.1038/ncb3559
42
MinodaA.SakagamiR.YagisawaF.KuroiwaT.TanakaK. (2004). Improvement of culture conditions and evidence for nuclear transformation by homologous recombination in a red alga, Cyanidioschyzon merolae 10D.Plant Cell Physiol.45667–671. 10.1093/pcp/pch087
43
MishraM.KashiwazakiJ.TakagiT.SrinivasanR.HuangY.BalasubramanianM. K.et al (2013). In vitro contraction of cytokinetic ring depends on myosin II but not on actin dynamics.Nat. Cell Biol.15853–859. 10.1038/ncb2781
44
MoritaE.ColfL. A.KarrenM. A.SandrinV.RodeschC. K.SundquistW. I. (2010). Human ESCRT-III and VPS4 proteins are required for centrosome and spindle maintenance.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.10712889–12894. 10.1073/pnas.1005938107
45
MoritaE.SandrinV.ChungH. Y.MorhamS. G.GygiS. P.RodeschC. K.et al (2007). Human ESCRT and ALIX proteins interact with proteins of the midbody and function in cytokinesis.EMBO J.264215–4227. 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601850
46
MullerS.JurgensG. (2016). Plant cytokinesis-No ring, no constriction but centrifugal construction of the partitioning membrane.Semin. Cell Dev. Biol.5310–18. 10.1016/j.semcdb.2015.10.037
47
MullinsJ. M.BieseleJ. J. (1977). Terminal phase of cytokinesis in D-98S cells.J. Cell Biol.73672–684. 10.1083/jcb.73.3.672
48
NishihamaR.OnishiM.PringleJ. R. (2011). New insights into the phylogenetic distribution and evolutionary origins of the septins.Biol. Chem.392681–687. 10.1515/BC.2011.086
49
NozakiH.TakanoH.MisumiO.TerasawaK.MatsuzakiM.MaruyamaS.et al (2007). A 100%-complete sequence reveals unusually simple genomic features in the hot-spring red alga Cyanidioschyzon merolae.BMC Biol.5:28. 10.1186/1741-7007-5-28
50
NumataO.KurasawaY.GondaK.WatanabeY. (2000). Tetrahymena elongation factor-1 alpha is localized with calmodulin in the division furrow.J. Biochem.12751–56. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a022583
51
OhnumaM.YokoyamaT.InouyeT.SekineY.TanakaK. (2008). Polyethylene glycol (PEG)-mediated transient gene expression in a red alga. Cyanidioschyzon merolae 10D.Plant Cell Physiol.49117–120. 10.1093/pcp/pcm157
52
OteguiM. S.VerbruggheK. J.SkopA. R. (2005). Midbodies and phragmoplasts, analogous structures involved in cytokinesis.Trends Cell Biol.15404–413. 10.1016/j.tcb.2005.06.003
53
OttoJ. J.SchroederT. E. (1990). Association of actin and myosin in the contractile ring.Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.582179–184. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1990.tb21678.x
54
PashaS. N.MeenakshiI.SowdhaminiR. (2016). Revisiting myosin families through large-scale sequence searches leads to the discovery of new myosins.Evol. Bioinform. Online12201–211. 10.4137/EBO.S39880
55
PollardT. D. (2017). Nine unanswered questions about cytokinesis.J. Cell Biol.2163007–3016. 10.1083/jcb.201612068
56
ReichlE. M.RenY.MorphewM. K.DelannoyM.EfflerJ. C.GirardK. D.et al (2008). Interactions between myosin and actin crosslinkers control cytokinesis contractility dynamics and mechanics.Curr. Biol.18471–480. 10.1016/j.cub.2008.02.056
57
RenshawM. J.LiuJ.LavoieB. D.WildeA. (2014). Anillin-dependent organization of septin filaments promotes intercellular bridge elongation and Chmp4B targeting to the abscission site.Open Biol.4:130190. 10.1098/rsob.130190
58
SamsonR. Y.ObitaT.FreundS. M.WilliamsR. L.BellS. D. (2008). A role for the ESCRT system in cell division in archaea.Science3221710–1713. 10.1126/science.1165322
59
SamsonR. Y.ObitaT.HodgsonB.ShawM. K.ChongP. L.WilliamsR. L.et al (2011). Molecular and structural basis of ESCRT-III recruitment to membranes during archaeal cell division.Mol. Cell.41186–196. 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.12.018
60
SchneiderC. A.RasbandW. S.EliceiriK. W. (2012). NIH Image to ImageJ, 25 years of image analysis.Nat. Methods9671–675. 10.1038/nmeth.2089
61
SchonebergJ.LeeI. H.IwasaJ. H.HurleyJ. H. (2017). Reverse-topology membrane scission by the ESCRT proteins.Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.185–17. 10.1038/nrm.2016.121
62
SchuhA. L.AudhyaA. (2014). The ESCRT machinery, from the plasma membrane to endosomes and back again.Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol49242–261. 10.3109/10409238.2014.881777
63
Sebe-PedrosA.Grau-BoveX.RichardsT. A.Ruiz-TrilloI. (2014). Evolution and classification of myosins, a paneukaryotic whole-genome approach.Genome Biol. Evol.6290–305. 10.1093/gbe/evu013
64
SpitzerC.SchellmannS.SabovljevicA.ShahriariM.KeshavaiahC.BechtoldN.et al (2006). The Arabidopsis elch mutant reveals functions of an ESCRT component in cytokinesis.Development1334679–4689. 10.1242/dev.02654
65
StotenC. L.CarltonJ. G. (2018). ESCRT-dependent control of membrane remodelling during cell division.Semin. Cell Dev. Biol.7450–65. 10.1016/j.semcdb.2017.08.035
66
SumiyaN.FujiwaraT.KobayashiY.MisumiO.MiyagishimaS. Y. (2014). Development of a heat-shock inducible gene expression system in the red alga Cyanidioschyzon merolae.PLoS One9:e111261. 10.1371/journal.pone.0111261
67
SuzukiK.EharaT.OsafuneT.KuroiwaH.KawanoS.KuroiwaT. (1994). Behavior of mitochondria, chloroplasts and their nuclei during the mitotic cycle in the ultramicroalga Cyanidioschyzon merolae.Eur. J. Cell Biol.63280–288.
68
SuzukiK.KawazuT.MitaT.TakahashiH.ItohR.TodaK.et al (1995). Cytokinesis by a contractile ring in the primitive red alga Cyanidium caldarium RK-1.Eur. J. Cell Biol.67170–178.
69
TakahashiH.TakanoH.YokoyamaA.HaraY.KawanoS.Toh-eA.et al (1995). Isolation, characterization and chromosomal mapping of an actin gene from the primitive red alga Cyanidioschyzon merolae.Curr. Genet.28484–490. 10.1007/bf00310820
70
TakemuraT.ImamuraS.KobayashiY.TanakaK. (2018). Construction of a selectable marker recycling system and the use in epitope tagging of multiple nuclear genes in the unicellular red alga Cyanidioschyzon merolae.Plant Cell Physiol.592308–2316. 10.1093/pcp/pcy156
71
TakemuraT.ImamuraS.KobayashiY.TanakaK. (2019a). Multiple modification of chromosomal loci using URA5.3 selection marker in the unicellular red alga Cyanidioschyzon merolae.Bioprotocol9:7. 10.21769/BioProtoc.3204
72
TakemuraT.KobayashiY.ImamuraS.TanakaK. (2019b). Top starch plating method for the efficient cultivation of unicellular red alga Cyanidioschyzon merolae.Bioprotocol9:4. 10.21769/BioProtoc.3172
73
TakiK.SoneT.KobayashiY.WatanabeS.ImamuraS.TanakaK. (2015). Construction of a URA5.3 deletion strain of the unicellular red alga Cyanidioschyzon merolae, A backgroundless host strain for transformation experiments.J. Gen. Appl. Microbiol.61211–214. 10.2323/jgam.61.211
74
TerryS. J.DonaF.OsenbergP.CarltonJ. G.EggertU. S. (2018). Capping protein regulates actin dynamics during cytokinetic midbody maturation.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.1152138–2143. 10.1073/pnas.1722281115
75
TodaK.TakanoH.MiyagishimaS.KuroiwaH.KuroiwaT. (1998). Characterization of a chloroplast isoform of serine acetyltransferase from the thermo-acidiphilic red alga Cyanidioschyzon merolae.Biochim. Biophys. Acta140372–84. 10.1016/s0167-4889(98)00031-7
76
WilliamsR. L.UrbeS. (2007). The emerging shape of the ESCRT machinery.Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.8355–368. 10.1038/nrm2162
77
WlogaD.Strzyzewska-JowkoI.GaertigJ.Jerka-DziadoszM. (2008). Septins stabilize mitochondria in Tetrahymena thermophila.Eukaryot. Cell71373–1386. 10.1128/EC.00085-08
78
WuJ. Q.YeY.WangN.PollardT. D.PringleJ. R. (2010). Cooperation between the septins and the actomyosin ring and role of a cell-integrity pathway during cell division in fission yeast.Genetics186897–915. 10.1534/genetics.110.119842
79
YagisawaF.ImotoY.FujiwaraT.MiyagishimaS. (2018). “Single-membrane-bound organelles: division and inheritance,” in Cyanidioschyzon merolae, edsKuroiwaT.et al (Singapore: Springer), 235–249. 10.1007/978-981-10-6101-1_15
80
YamamotoM.NishikawaT.KajitaniH.KawanoS. (2007). Patterns of asexual reproduction in Nannochloris bacillaris and Marvania geminata (Chlorophyta, Trebouxiophyceae).Planta226917–927. 10.1007/s00425-007-0538-7
81
YamazakiT.OwariS.OtaS.SumiyaN.YamamotoM.WatanabeK.et al (2013). Localization and evolution of septins in algae.Plant J.74605–614. 10.1111/tpj.12147
82
YangD.RismanchiN.RenvoiseB.Lippincott-SchwartzJ.BlackstoneC.HurleyJ. H. (2008). Structural basis for midbody targeting of spastin by the ESCRT-III protein CHMP1B.Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol.151278–1286. 10.1038/nsmb.1512
83
YoonH. S.HackettJ. D.CinigliaC.PintoG.BhattacharyaD. (2004). A molecular timeline for the origin of photosynthetic eukaryotes.Mol. Biol. Evol.21809–818. 10.1093/molbev/msh075
84
YoonH. S.MullerK. M.SheathR. G.OttF. D.BhattacharyaD. (2006). Defining the major lineages of red algae (Rhodophyta).J. Phycol.42482–492. 10.1111/j.1529-8817.2006.00210.x
85
Zaremba-NiedzwiedzkaK.CaceresE. F.SawJ. H.BackstromD.JuzokaiteL.VancaesterE.et al (2017). Asgard archaea illuminate the origin of eukaryotic cellular complexity.Nature541353–358. 10.1038/nature21031
86
ZhouQ.HuH.LiZ. (2014). New insights into the molecular mechanisms of mitosis and cytokinesis in trypanosomes.Int. Rev. Cell Mol. Biol.308127–166. 10.1016/B978-0-12-800097-7.00004-X
Summary
Keywords
ESCRT, cytokinesis, cytokinetic abscission, red alga, Cyanidioschyzon merolae
Citation
Yagisawa F, Fujiwara T, Takemura T, Kobayashi Y, Sumiya N, Miyagishima S, Nakamura S, Imoto Y, Misumi O, Tanaka K, Kuroiwa H and Kuroiwa T (2020) ESCRT Machinery Mediates Cytokinetic Abscission in the Unicellular Red Alga Cyanidioschyzon merolae. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 8:169. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2020.00169
Received
22 October 2019
Accepted
29 February 2020
Published
03 April 2020
Volume
8 - 2020
Edited by
Issei Mabuchi, University of Tokyo, Japan
Reviewed by
Jez Carlton, King’s College London, United Kingdom; Natalie Elia, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Israel
Updates
Copyright
© 2020 Yagisawa, Fujiwara, Takemura, Kobayashi, Sumiya, Miyagishima, Nakamura, Imoto, Misumi, Tanaka, Kuroiwa and Kuroiwa.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Fumi Yagisawa, yagisawa@lab.u-ryukyu.ac.jp
†These authors have contributed equally to this work
‡Present address: Nobuko Sumiya, Department of Biology, Keio University, Yokohama, Japan
This article was submitted to Cell Growth and Division, a section of the journal Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.