Abstract
DNA and RNA methylation dynamics have been linked to a variety of cellular processes such as development, differentiation, and the maintenance of genome integrity. The correct deposition and removal of methylated cytosine and its oxidized analogues is pivotal for cellular homeostasis, rapid responses to exogenous stimuli, and regulated gene expression. Uncoordinated expression of DNA/RNA methyltransferases and demethylase enzymes has been linked to genome instability and consequently to cancer progression. Furthermore, accumulating evidence indicates that post-transcriptional DNA/RNA modifications are important features in DNA/RNA function, regulating the timely recruitment of modification-specific reader proteins. Understanding the biological processes that lead to tumorigenesis or somatic reprogramming has attracted a lot of attention from the scientific community. This work has revealed extensive crosstalk between epigenetic and epitranscriptomic pathways, adding a new layer of complexity to our understanding of cellular programming and responses to environmental cues. One of the key modifications, m5C, has been identified as a contributor to regulation of the DNA damage response (DDR). However, the various mechanisms of dynamic m5C deposition and removal, and the role m5C plays within the cell, remains to be fully understood.
Introduction
Gene expression regulation is not only affected by mutations in the genomic sequence, but also by various other molecular mechanisms (Allis and Jenuwein, 2016), such as epigenetic regulation. Epigenetic regulation can influence gene expression profiles regardless of the genomic sequence, and can result in either the condensation or relaxation of the chromatin structure (Dai et al., 2020). The main players in epigenetic control; m5C DNA methylation, histone modifications, and non-coding RNAs (Kumar et al., 2018), have been linked to genome stability and are known to contribute to the maintenance of genome integrity (Deem et al., 2012). Three distinct aspects govern epigenetic status; inheritance, environmental factors, and stability over time (Bonasio et al., 2010). Epigenetic modifications are stable enough to maintain cellular homeostasis, but are also reversible to allow transitions among different states and responses to environmental cues (Zhang et al., 2019). The dynamic nature of epigenetic features controls several aspects of transcription regulation and consequently influences many physiological processes, such as development (John and Rougeulle, 2018), transposon control (Misiak et al., 2019), and brain and memory formation (Kim and Kaang, 2017). Furthermore, deregulation of epigenetic processes can lead to genomic instability, promoting the onset and development of different diseases including cancer (Lu et al., 2020) (Liu et al., 2017). For example, during cancer development, genome-wide DNA hypomethylation and gene-specific hypermethylation occur as a consequence of mutated or deregulated chromatin modifiers (Ibrahim et al., 2022). Thus, epigenetic alterations or epimutations (McCarrey et al., 2016) result in abnormal transcriptional repression or activation of genes (Lee, 2019). Epimutations can be classified into two groups: primary, which are epigenetic alterations in the absence of a genetic change, and secondary epimutations, which are acquired as a consequence of DNA mutations in genes of cis or trans-acting chromatin factors (Oey and Whitelaw, 2014). Interestingly, secondary epimutations are the most reported in cancers (Ruiz de la Cruz et al., 2021). At a molecular level, epigenetics involves a complex and dynamically reversible set of structural modifications of chromatin catalysed by enzymes often referred to as “writers,” which add different chemical modifications such as methyl group moieties to DNA (Biswas and Rao, 2018). These molecular decorations are then able to recruit a plethora of proteins called “readers” that specifically recognise these moieties (Du et al., 2015). Finally, a set of “erasers” catalyses the removal of the deposited modification. Writers, readers, and erasers function dynamically to regulate the epigenetic landscape. Concerted variations of epigenetic modifications ensure an organism’s normal development and its responsiveness to environmental stimuli (Norouzitallab et al., 2019). Removal and restoration of methylation marks is also important during embryonic development, with coordinated waves of demethylation and de novo methylation establishing specific cell fates (Wu and Zhang, 2014). With recent advances in high-throughput sequencing techniques and transcriptome-wide studies, more than 150 post-transcriptional modifications have been also described on RNA, termed the epitranscriptome (Ma et al., 2022). Similarly to DNA methylation, RNA bases can be methylated and can function in the fine-tuning of gene expression (Kumar and Mohapatra, 2021) (Seo and Kleiner, 2021) (Willbanks et al., 2021). Epitranscriptomic studies have also revealed how post-transcriptional RNA modifications can dynamically affect several aspects of RNA metabolism including processing, export, translation, and RNA stability (Flamand and Meyer, 2019; Ranjan and Leidel, 2019; Trixl and Lusser, 2019; Boo and Kim, 2020; Chen et al., 2021a; Kumar and Mohapatra, 2021; Schaefer, 2021). Furthermore, epitranscriptomic changes have been demonstrated to play a crucial role in stress response processes (such as the DNA damage response) (Jimeno et al., 2021; Wilkinson et al., 2021) and aberrant epitranscriptomes are associated with several human diseases, including cancer (Hsu et al., 2017; Jiang et al., 2017; Lian et al., 2018; Esteve-Puig et al., 2020). Unlike epigenetic DNA modifications, RNA methylation cannot be transferred into offspring and can result in significant changes in RNA secondary structure (Schaefer et al., 2017). Changes in base-pairing potential and protein-RNA interactions make epitranscriptomics a complex cellular mechanism that impacts both RNA metabolism and gene expression (Kan et al., 2022). Epigenetic and epitranscriptomic marks have the ability to expand the physicochemical features of the A-T-C-G nucleobases. The m5C DNA modification, known as the fifth base, has been extensively described as a CpG-specific modification able to modulate chromatin architecture with the assistance of repressive histone mark deposition. More recently, significant technical progress for RNA m5C detection approaches has been made (Yuan et al., 2019). Novel techniques, including m5C RNA immunoprecipitation sequencing (m5C-RIP-seq), 5-AZA-cytidine-mediated RNA immunoprecipitation sequencing (Aza-IP-seq) (Guo et al., 2021), methylation-individual nucleotide resolution crosslinking immunoprecipitation sequencing (miCLIP-seq) (Chen et al., 2021a) and TET-assisted peroxotungstate oxidation sequencing (TAWO-seq) (Yuan et al., 2019), were successfully developed and applied. The presence of m5C has been detected in diverse RNA molecules including tRNAs, rRNAs, mRNAs, viral RNAs, and ncRNAs (George et al., 2017; Genenncher et al., 2018; Zeng et al., 2018; García-Vílchez et al., 2019; Trixl and Lusser, 2019; Zhao et al., 2020). Although the m5C modification on RNA has been demonstrated to play a role in the pathogenesis of several diseases, the mechanism of action remains largely unexplored. Furthermore, evidence of changes in the transcriptional landscape driven by m5C during several physiopathological processes, ranging from pluripotency, development, differentiation, genome instability, and oncogenesis have been reported (Frye et al., 2018; Bohnsack et al., 2019; He et al., 2020; Song et al., 2022). A large amount of scientific literature describes cancer as a genetic, epigenetic, and epitranscriptomic disease (Esteller and Pandolfi, 2017; Lobo et al., 2018; Porcellini et al., 2018; Xue et al., 2020a; Esteve-Puig et al., 2020; Xie et al., 2020; Miano et al., 2021; Lopez et al., 2022). Oncogenesis driven by genome instability and consequently accumulation of mutations is a complex pathological process that involves changes in gene expression. Both hypermethylation and hypomethylation at different genetic loci and of RNAs is strongly correlated to tumour initiation, progression, and metastasis (Pérez et al., 2018; Locke et al., 2019; Nishiyama and Nakanishi, 2021). Furthermore, deregulated deposition and removal of methylation marks as a result of deregulated writer and eraser enzymes has also been described as a hallmark of cancer chemotherapy resistance (Ginno et al., 2020; Romero-Garcia et al., 2020; Feng et al., 2021a; Sun et al., 2021a; Zhao et al., 2021). In this review, we summarise the current insights surrounding the dynamics of m5C and its oxidized derivatives (hm5C, f5C, and ca5C) and their relevance in patho-physiological contexts such as pluripotency, development, differentiation, the DNA damage response, and cancer.
DNA/RNA Cytosine Methylation
The addition of a methyl group at the carbon-5 position of cytosine in DNA in the CpG dinucleotide context is catalysed by the S-adenosyl-methionine-dependent DNMT methyltransferase family. DNMT1 primarily maintains DNA methylation patterns during replication, while DNMT3A, DNMT3B, and DNMT3L are predominantly involved in the establishment of de novo DNA methylation (Figure 1) (Lyko, 2018). Proper maintenance of DNA methylation patterns defines the structural and functional identities of cells throughout cell division (Moore et al., 2013). Although DNA methylation patterns are stable, active and passive demethylation modulates a dynamic methylation process (Sadakierska-Chudy et al., 2015). Passive demethylation or replication-dependent dilution occurs after the synthesis of newly replicated DNA strands. Without functional DNA m5C methylation maintenance of newly synthesized DNA strands, the symmetry of methylation is not re-established and methylation is lost through replication cycles. On the other hand, DNA methylation can be actively reversed by family of α-ketoglutarate-dependent dioxygenases, known as Ten-Eleven Translocation (TET) proteins, which exist as 3 isoforms: TET1, TET2, TET3 (Lan et al., 2020). Hydroxylation of m5C analogue to 5-Hydroxymethylcytosine (hm5C), alters the affinity of DNMT1 for the methylated site, and results in loss of the epigenetic mark over several rounds of DNA replication. RNA m5C modification has been found in mRNAs, rRNAs, tRNAs, and ncRNAs. The RNA specific subset of S-adenosyl-methionine-dependent methyltransferases includes TRDMT1 (tRNA aspartic acid methyltransferase 1) (Li et al., 2021a), also known as DNMT2, and the NSUN1-7 (NOP2/Sun RNA methyltransferases) family, which are responsible for the deposition of m5C on RNA (Bohnsack et al., 2019; Sun et al., 2019; Liu and Santi, 2000). The m5C mark is reported to be involved in the regulation of RNA metabolism and is principally associated with structural and functional RNA stability, and its dynamic deposition and removal also permits rapid cellular responses to environmental cues (Gkatza et al., 2019). For example, several lines of evidence identified the m5C modification as a modulator of the maturation, stability, and translation of mRNA molecules, and is also important for nuclear export (Schumann et al., 2020; Huang et al., 2019). Changes in the m5C deposition pattern in mRNA is also associated with several hallmarks of cancer including cell survival, proliferation, invasion, and resistance to therapy (Zhang et al., 2020a; Nombela et al., 2021; Zhang et al., 2021; Xue et al., 2020b). Furthermore, the majority of m5C patterns on RNA are lineage- and tissue-specific (Amort et al., 2017). The presence of the m5C modification has been described on both the small and large rRNA subunits. M5C controls ribosome synthesis and processing, and can alter the conformation of the rRNA, effecting translation fidelity (Schosserer et al., 2015; Popis et al., 2016). In tRNA, m5C is mostly present at the junction of the variable loop and the T-stem spanning positions (47–50) (Van Haute et al., 2019). The presence of m5C on tRNA has been linked to proper folding of the tRNA molecule into an L-shaped structure. However, m5C has been also shown to be present at the C38 position in the anticodon loop of tRNA and can modulate the translation fidelity of a specific subset of genes (Huang et al., 2021a). In mRNA, the m5C modification is enriched in 5′/3′-UTRs, next to Argonaute-binding regions, but is depleted in coding regions (Figure 2). m5C has been also detected in many ncRNAs such as lncRNAs, lincRNAs, pseudogene transcripts, antisense transcripts, and vault RNAs (Amort et al., 2013; Khoddami and Cairns, 2013; Sajini et al., 2019; Sun et al., 2020), and its presence is likely to be linked to processing, stability, and interaction with m5C reader proteins.
FIGURE 1
DNA methylation and demethylation machinery. DNA methyltransferase 3A (DNMT3A) and DNA methyltransferase 3B (DNMT3B) are responsible for the creation of DNA methylation patterns. DNA methyltransferase 3L (DNMT3L) interacts and stimulates DNMT3A and DNMT3B methylation activity. DNA methyltransferase 1 (DNMT1) is actively involved in the maintenance of DNA methylation patterns. Passive demethylation occurs in the absence of functional DNMT1, which methylates DNA after each cellular division. Active demethylation is mediated by Ten-eleven Translocation (TET) dioxygenases. TET enzymes oxidize 5-methylcytosine (m5C) to produce 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (hm5C), 5-formylcytosine (f5C) and 5-carboxylcytosine (ca5C). The glycosylase activity of TDG allows the excision of Tet-produced f5C or ca5C nucleobases. Created with BioRender.com.
FIGURE 2
Distribution of m5C and hm5C post-transcriptional modifications on mRNA molecules. 5-methylcytosine (m5C) is predominantly found in 5′ untranslated regions (5′ UTRs), while 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (hm5C) is present within the coding sequence (CDS). Created with BioRender.com.
5-Methylcytosine Modification in Cancer Onset
m5C-driven epigenetic and epitranscriptomic events are entwined in cellular homeostasis. Deregulated m5C deposition can promote cancer development as a consequence of deregulation of both DNA and RNA molecules (Sun et al., 2021b). The m5C-mediated upregulation of proto-oncogenes or silencing of tumour suppressor genes, together with an enhanced translation rate and stability of mRNA oncogenes, are common molecular events in many types of cancers including leukaemia, breast, bladder, gastric, ovarian, colorectal, and lung (Atala, 2020; Zhang et al., 2020a; Sun et al., 2020; Hu et al., 2021a; Awah et al., 2021; Huang et al., 2021b; Li et al., 2021b). Furthermore, alterations in DNMTs expression levels or activity have been linked to both hypermethylation of tumour-suppressor genes and hypomethylation of proto-oncogene genes (Nishiyama and Nakanishi, 2021). In addition, overexpression of the RNA m5C writer NSUN2 (Okamoto et al., 2012; Yi et al., 2017; Cheng et al., 2018; Chellamuthu and Gray, 2020; Xiang et al., 2020; Hu et al., 2021a; Su et al., 2021; Wang et al., 2022) and RNA m5C reader YBX1, has been associated with mRNA hypermethylation and oncogene activation (Chen et al., 2019). Furthermore, the NSUN2-YBX1-oncogene axis is a commonly deregulated pathway during the cancer onset and progression (Wang et al., 2022).
5-Methylcytosine Modification in DNA Damage Response
Since several RNA species (DNA damage response RNAs, damage-induced lncRNAs, de novo transcripts and DNA:RNA hybrids) have been described to be essential during DNA damage repair (Ketley and Gullerova, 2020), a pioneering study has investigated the possibility of RNA post-transcriptional modification relevance in DNA double strand break (DSB) repair. DNMT2/TRDMT1 protein was shown to be recruited to damage sites, where it is able to catalyse the deposition of m5C residues onto DNA:RNA hybrids (Chen et al., 2020a). m5C-modified DNA:RNA hybrids promoted the recruitment of specific readers including Rad52, which drives the later stages of DNA repair. In addition, loss of DNMT2 proved to be detrimental during the DNA damage response, suggesting the importance of m5C presence during HR-mediated DNA damage repair (Zhu et al., 2021).
Ten-Eleven Translocation-Driven Iterative 5-Methylcytosine Oxidation (5-Hydroxymethylcytosine > 5-Formylcytosine > 5-Carboxylcytosine) in DNA and RNA
The presence of m5C in the genome is dynamically controlled by the antagonising action of specific writers and erasers. DNMT family members are mainly responsible for the deposition of m5C at both the DNA and RNA level, while Ten-eleven translocation (TET) proteins are considered m5C erasers. Active demethylation of m5C is achieved by TET-mediated sequential oxidation with the production of hm5C (5-Hydroxymethylcytosine), f5C (5-formylcytosine), ca5C (5-carboxylcytosine) analogues (Figure 1) (Ito et al., 2011). Then, the N-glycosidic bond of f5C and ca5C is processed by the Thymine DNA Glycosylase (TDG) to form abasic sites, followed by Base Excision Repair (BER) to restore the unmodified cytosine (He et al., 2011; Bordin et al., 2021). Alternative pathways include; 1) direct deformylation (f5C) and decarboxylation (ca5C) mediated by DNMT3A/B (Feng et al., 2021b), 2) AID/APOBEC-dependent deamination and production of 5hmU followed by TDG cleavage (Cervantes-Gracia et al., 2021), and 3) passive DNA replication-dependent loss (Vincenzetti et al., 2019). However, TET enzymes appeared to be involved in the oxidation of both DNA and RNA m5C (Wu and Zhang, 2011; Fu et al., 2014; He et al., 2021a). In vitro studies confirmed that double stranded DNA is the preferred TET substrate, followed by DNA:RNA hybrids, single stranded DNA and single stranded RNA. Double strand RNA molecules were shown not to be TET substrates, likely due to TET discrimination against the RNA A-form conformation (DeNizio et al., 2019).
5-Hydroxymethylcytosine
The hm5C mark has been annotated at promoters, enhancers, and in gene bodies (Cui et al., 2020). While hm5C is mainly associated with active gene transcription and an open chromatin structure, its role depends on the genomic context (active vs. poised genes) (Choi et al., 2014). Furthermore, hm5C modification has a locus and tissue specific signature and serves as a feature of cellular state and identity. Genome-wide mapping at a single-nucleotide resolution level using modification specific antibodies, has estimated that around the 5% of cytosine residues in mammalian genome are modified as m5C and less than the 1% are hm5C (He et al., 2021b). The presence hm5C has been described not only at promoters, enhancers and gene body regions, but also on several RNA molecules (Delatte et al., 2016). m5C and hm5C modifications have been identified as stable epigenetic marks, and different chromatin-binding proteins have been shown to specifically bind to either m5C or hm5C, suggesting these modifications have distinct functions in epigenetic regulation. Recent studies have identified several proteins which preferentially “read” m5C or its oxidized forms. For example, the Methyl-CpG binding domain (MBD) protein family plays a pivotal role in determining the transcriptional state of the epigenome and shows a strong preference for hm5C over the m5C modification (Buchmuller et al., 2020). MBD proteins mainly belong to chromatin-bound repressor complexes, which coordinate crosstalk between m5C methylation, histone modifications, and chromatin organization. TET-mediated hm5C biogenesis blocks the reader function of the MBDs and alleviates their transcriptional repression, producing a new platform for hm5C specific readers and transcriptional activation.
5-Formylcytosine and 5-Carboxylcytosine
Despite the fact that f5C and ca5C oxidized forms of m5C are considered short-lived intermediates in the demethylation process, and their steady-state levels are many orders of magnitude lower than hm5C, emerging evidence indicates that f5C and ca5C might have independent epigenetic signalling roles in recruiting modification-specific “reader” proteins (Song and He, 2013). f5C and ca5C can be recognized by transcriptional regulators, DNA repair factors, and chromatin regulators, predominantly stimulating gene activation. Beside these regulatory roles, some studies have proposed the TET-mediated oxidative products f5C and ca5C are mutagenic bases that can threaten the genomic integrity if not properly eliminated. Moreover, deregulation of TET-TDG-BER pathway and inefficient f5C and ca5C clearance has been linked to DNA damage and the production of DSBs (Weber et al., 2016).
5-Hydroxymethylcytosine Modification in Pluripotency, Development, and Differentiation
Transcriptome flexibility is required for embryonic stem cell (ESC) differentiation (Dawlaty et al., 2014; Lan et al., 2020). Cell fate commitment requires efficient and timely control of the expression of pluripotency-associated factors. hm5C can promote a rapid response during differentiation processes (Cimmino et al., 2011; Kuehner et al., 2021). The RNA hm5C modification has been described as a guardian of the transcriptional landscape, able to regulate the balance between pluripotency and lineage-priming mRNAs and ensures ESC differentiation in a timely and orderly manner (Wu et al., 2018; Yang et al., 2020). TET-dependent hydroxymethylation of mRNA molecules can regulate RNA half-life and splicing. In mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs) hm5C has been linked to the downregulation of certain mRNAs linked to pluripotency allowing ESC-to-EB (embryo body) differentiation (Lan et al., 2020). During somatic reprogramming to pluripotency, hm5C deposition drives site-specific demethylation of reprogramming enhancers and promoters resulting in the formation of iPSC (induced pluripotent stem cells) (Caldwell et al., 2021). TET triple knockout cells failed to undergo iPSC reprogramming, highlighting the importance of m5C hydroxylation during state transitions. Furthermore, a report on somatic reprogramming determined the contribution of hm5C deposition decoupled from the production of the oxidative derivatives f5C and ca5C using a hm5C-stalled TET enzyme. Interestingly, hm5C deposition alone is not sufficient for iPSC reprogramming, and f5C, ca5C and the TDG protein appeared to be crucial in this process, suggesting a different role of hm5C and the f5C and ca5C epigenetic signatures (Caldwell et al., 2021).
5-Hydroxymethylcytosine Modification in Cancer Onset
hm5C has been proposed to act as a novel diagnostic and prognostic marker in several human malignancies (Scourzic et al., 2015; An et al., 2017). Loss or inactivation of TET enzymes and deregulation of m5C demethylation are emerging as crucial determinants for cancer phenotypes. Modulation of the expression and activity of TET proteins can occur as a result of different mechanisms, such as m5C-mediated silencing of the TET loci or changes in the intracellular concentration of TET co-factors (i.e., α-Ketoglutarate, oxygen, iron, vitamin C) (Scourzic et al., 2015; Yue and Rao, 2020; Matuleviciute et al., 2021). Several studies have outlined a negative correlation between the loss of TET activity with increased levels of m5C and decreased levels of hm5C, and poor prognosis in cancers including lung, cervical, breast, glioblastoma, and hematopoietic (López-Moyado et al., 2019; Gao et al., 2021; Xu et al., 2021; Lopez-Bertoni et al., 2022; Xu et al., 2022). The deregulation of m5C and hm5C affects cell transcriptional programs and leads to cancer stem-like phenotypes. Moreover, aberrant deposition of hm5C has been also proposed as a contributing factor to chemotherapy resistance (Kharat and Sharan, 2020).
5-Hydroxymethylcytosine Modification in the DNA Damage Response
Of note, TET-mediated hm5C accumulation has also been described at DNA damage, suggesting a crucial role for hm5C in promoting DNA damage repair (Kafer et al., 2016). Possible mechanisms of action could be linked to the ability of hm5C to promote or maintain an open chromatin configuration. hm5C modification is able to control DNA accessibility through a DNA-end breathing motion that can decrease nucleosome affinities, facilitate RNA polymerase II elongation, and lower the thermodynamic stability of the DNA duplex (Mendonca et al., 2014; Li et al., 2022). Local accessibility of hm5C chromatin driven by hm5C, could serve as a platform for the recruitment of late-acting DNA damage repair factors. The hm5C modification has also been found to promote the formation of DNA:RNA hybrids (R-loops) in vitro and in vivo (Sabino et al., 2022; Shukla et al., 2022; Yang et al., 2022). Given that DNA:RNA hybrids are well-established triggers of DNA damage, hm5C modification has been proposed as novel player in genome instability. Several studies have documented a direct association between TET deficiency and increased level of DNA double strand breaks caused by the accumulation of R-loop structures. Ineffective m5C demethylation can further impair DNA damage repair through the retention of m5C readers on the R-loops and delayed R-loop resolution. Even if hm5C deposition in DNA damage responses is not fully understood, a direct correlation between the level of hm5C and fork stability has recently been described (Kharat et al., 2020). Upon DNA damage, ATM and ATR kinases can phosphorylate TET proteins and stimulate hm5C deposition close to the replication fork. The excessive presence of hm5C at replication forks triggers BER-mediated repair of hm5C, leading to the production of abasic sites which could sources of genome instability.
Beyond 5-Methylcytosine: The Role of N6-Methyladenosine Modification
Dynamic and reversible chemical control of DNA and RNA also encompasses other methylated nucleobases. So far, several enzymatically methylated residues including N6-methyladenosine (m6A) (Zhu et al., 2020), N1-methyladenosine (m1A) (Xiong et al., 2018), N7-methylguanosine (m7G) (Enroth et al., 2019) and N4-methylcytosine (m4C) (Chen et al., 2020b) have been described in all major RNA types, while their presence in DNA is mainly restricted to m6A (Xu and Bochtler, 2020). For example, the existence of m6A in DNA has been suggested to be dependent on RNA catabolism rather than a specific m6A writer, arguing against the proposed role of m6A as a heritable epigenetic mark (Musheev et al., 2020). This evidence is also corroborated by the homogeneous distribution of m6A throughout the genome, implying an incorporation of m6A form the RNA nucleoside pool rather than from the direct action of a DNA methyltransferase. Although some reports have proposed a role for m6A in the epigenetic control of the heterochromatin formation, m6A-mediated regulation of chromatin dynamics appears to depend more on m6A methylated RNAs such as chromosome-associated regulatory RNAs (carRNAs) (Zhang et al., 2020b; Liu et al., 2020; Selmi and Lanzuolo, 2022) rather than a direct effect of m6A deposition in the genome. Nevertheless, m6A is a well-established RNA epitranscriptomic mark and its dynamical and reversible write and erase processes are mainly regulated by some members of the methyltransferase-like gene family (METTL3, METTL13 and METTL14) and FTO and ALKBH5 enzymes, respectively (Meyer and Jaffrey, 2014). The m6A writing process predominantly occurs in the nucleus, while reading and erasing events are reported in both the nucleus and cytoplasm. Distinctive subcellular localization of m6A erasers and readers confers the specific roles of the m6A residue, and thereby influences different pathways. m6A functions have been linked to several biological processes such as modulation of splicing by altering the structure of pre-mRNAs (Zhou et al., 2019), increased miRNA biogenesis by enhancing the recognition and processing of the microRNA microprocessor complex protein DGCR8 (Han et al., 2021), transcription termination by facilitating the co-transcriptional R-loops formation (Yang et al., 2019), regulation of DNA damage repair by the accumulation of DNA:RNA hybrids at DSB sites (Zhang et al., 2020c; Qu et al., 2021) development and pluripotency (Zhang et al., 2020b; Jin et al., 2021). Furthermore, it has been reported that m6A modification can influence mRNA export from the nucleus, determine transcripts turnover and stimulate translation initiation (Jiang et al., 2021). Perturbation of m6A deposition and elimination dynamics, due to upregulated or mutated enzymes, has been associated with tumor initiation and progression, metastasis, cell proliferation and self-renewal (He et al., 2019; Zhou et al., 2020). Moreover, opposite effects of m6A modification levels reported in some cancer settings (e.g., ovarian cancers), can be explained by the involvement of specific m6A readers in the stability of either oncogene or tumor-suppressor m6A-modified mRNAs (Chen et al., 2021b; Huang et al., 2022).
Concluding Remarks
A growing body of evidence suggest that epigenetic and epitranscriptomic dynamics are profoundly interconnected. Methyltransferases (“writers”) and demethylases (“erasers”) functionally cooperate and compete to maintain the appropriate amount of m5C and its oxidized derivatives across both the genome and the transcriptome. Maintenance of effective, time regulated, and lineage-specific methylation-demethylation dynamics is needed for cellular homeostasis and responses to diverse stimuli. Mutations in epigenetic and epitranscriptomic modifiers can deregulate normal cellular differentiation and programmed growth control. As a consequence of altered patterns of hm5C and m5C, mainly characterised by global hypomethylation and focal hypermethylation, multiple stages of tumorigenesis including initiation, progression and metastasis, are promoted. Moreover, numerous reports correlate the loss of hm5C with poor prognosis. Restoration of proper methylation-demethylation dynamics in cells could be achieve with several approaches. Identification of druggable targets of both main players (DNMTs, TETs) and pivotal intermediates (miRNAs or lncRNAs) is crucial for the development of classical inhibitors or RNA-based drugs. A combination of epigenetic therapy and classical chemotherapy is a promising approach aiming at reducing tumour growth and self-renewal characteristics, while reducing chemoresistance (Hu et al., 2021b).
In addition, the intriguing possibility of precise and synchronized crosstalks between diverse epigenetic and epitranscriptomic marks (e.g., m5C and m6A) (Rengaraj et al., 2021) as versatile checkpoints in the maintenance of cellular homeostasis, may underpin a complex and comprehensive landscape of the cellular methylation game.
Statements
Author contributions
AA and MG discussed the structure and content of the review. AA wrote the draft and MG edited the draft.
Funding
This work was supported by the Senior Research Fellowship by Cancer Research United Kingdom (grant number BVR01170) awarded to MG, EPA Trust Fund (BVR01670) awarded to MG and Lee Placito Fund awarded to MG.
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to all members of MG lab, in particular to R.F. Ketley for her help with this manuscript.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcell.2022.915685/full#supplementary-material
References
1
AllisC. D.JenuweinT. (2016). The Molecular Hallmarks of Epigenetic Control. Nat. Rev. Genet.17, 487–500. 10.1038/nrg.2016.59
2
AmortT.SoulièreM. F.WilleA.JiaX. Y.FieglH.WörleH.et al (2013). Long Non-coding RNAs as Targets for Cytosine Methylation. RNA Biol.10, 1003–1008. 10.4161/rna.24454
3
AmortT.RiederD.WilleA.Khokhlova-CubberleyD.RimlC.TrixlL.et al (2017). Distinct 5-methylcytosine Profiles in Poly(A) RNA from Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells and Brain. Genome Biol.18, 1. 10.1186/s13059-016-1139-1
4
AnJ.RaoA.KoM. (2017). TET Family Dioxygenases and DNA Demethylation in Stem Cells and Cancers. Exp. Mol. Med.49, e323. 10.1038/emm.2017.5
5
AtalaA. (2020). Re: 5-Methylcytosine Promotes Pathogenesis of Bladder Cancer through Stabilizing mRNAs. J. Urology203, 884–885. 10.1097/ju.0000000000000781
6
AwahC. U.WinterJ.MazdoomC. M.OgunwobiO. O. (2021). NSUN6, an RNA Methyltransferase of 5-mC Controls Glioblastoma Response to Temozolomide (TMZ) via NELFB and RPS6KB2 Interaction. Cancer Biol. Ther.22, 587–597. 10.1080/15384047.2021.1990631
7
BiswasS.RaoC. M. (2018). Epigenetic Tools (The Writers, The Readers and The Erasers) and Their Implications in Cancer Therapy. Eur. J. Pharmacol.837, 8–24. 10.1016/j.ejphar.2018.08.021
8
BohnsackK. E.HöbartnerC.BohnsackM. T. (2019). Eukaryotic 5-methylcytosine (m⁵C) RNA Methyltransferases: Mechanisms, Cellular Functions, and Links to Disease. Genes (Basel)10, 102. 10.3390/genes10020102
9
BonasioR.TuS.ReinbergD. (2010). Molecular Signals of Epigenetic States. Science330, 612–616. 10.1126/science.1191078
10
BooS. H.KimY. K. (2020). The Emerging Role of RNA Modifications in the Regulation of mRNA Stability. Exp. Mol. Med.52, 400–408. 10.1038/s12276-020-0407-z
11
BordinD. L.LirussiL.NilsenH. (2021). Cellular Response to Endogenous DNA Damage: DNA Base Modifications in Gene Expression Regulation. DNA Repair99, 103051. 10.1016/j.dnarep.2021.103051
12
BuchmullerB. C.KoselB.SummererD. (2020). Complete Profiling of Methyl-CpG-Binding Domains for Combinations of Cytosine Modifications at CpG Dinucleotides Reveals Differential Read-Out in Normal and Rett-Associated States. Sci. Rep.10, 4053. 10.1038/s41598-020-61030-1
13
CaldwellB. A.LiuM. Y.PrasasyaR. D.WangT.DeNizioJ. E.LeuN. A.et al (2021). Functionally Distinct Roles for TET-Oxidized 5-methylcytosine Bases in Somatic Reprogramming to Pluripotency. Mol. Cell81, 859–869. 10.1016/j.molcel.2020.11.045
14
Cervantes-GraciaK.Gramalla-SchmitzA.WeischedelJ.ChahwanR. (2021). APOBECs Orchestrate Genomic and Epigenomic Editing across Health and Disease. Trends Genet.37, 1028–1043. 10.1016/j.tig.2021.07.003
15
ChellamuthuA.GrayS. G. (2020). The RNA Methyltransferase NSUN2 and Its Potential Roles in Cancer. Cells9, 1758. 10.3390/cells9081758
16
ChenH.ShiZ.GuoJ.ChangK.-j.ChenQ.YaoC.-H.et al (2020). The Human Mitochondrial 12S rRNA m4C Methyltransferase METTL15 Is Required for Mitochondrial Function. J. Biol. Chem.295, 8505–8513. 10.1074/jbc.ra119.012127
17
ChenH.YangH.ZhuX.YadavT.OuyangJ.TruesdellS. S.et al (2020). m5C Modification of mRNA Serves a DNA Damage Code to Promote Homologous recombinationC Modification of mRNA Serves a DNA Damage Code to Promote Homologous Recombination. Nat. Commun.11, 2834. 10.1038/s41467-020-16722-7
18
ChenX.LiA.SunB.-F.YangY.HanY.-N.YuanX.et al (2019). 5-methylcytosine Promotes Pathogenesis of Bladder Cancer through Stabilizing mRNAs. Nat. Cell Biol.21, 978–990. 10.1038/s41556-019-0361-y
19
ChenY. S.YangW. L.ZhaoY. L.YangY. G. (2021). Dynamic Transcriptomic M(5) C and its Regulatory Role in RNA Processing. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. RNA.12, e1639. 10.1002/wrna.1639
20
ChenZ.ZhongX.XiaM.ZhongJ. (2021). The Roles and Mechanisms of the m6A Reader Protein YTHDF1 in Tumor Biology and Human Diseases. Mol. Ther. - Nucleic Acids26, 1270–1279. 10.1016/j.omtn.2021.10.023
21
ChengJ. X.ChenL.LiY.CloeA.YueM.WeiJ.et al (2018). RNA Cytosine Methylation and Methyltransferases Mediate Chromatin Organization and 5-azacytidine Response and Resistance in Leukaemia. Nat. Commun.9, 1163. 10.1038/s41467-018-03513-4
22
ChoiI.KimR.LimH.-W.KaestnerK. H.WonK.-J. (2014). 5-hydroxymethylcytosine Represses the Activity of Enhancers in Embryonic Stem Cells: a New Epigenetic Signature for Gene Regulation. BMC Genomics15, 670. 10.1186/1471-2164-15-670
23
CimminoL.Abdel-WahabO.LevineR. L.AifantisI. (2011). TET Family Proteins and Their Role in Stem Cell Differentiation and Transformation. Cell Stem Cell9, 193–204. 10.1016/j.stem.2011.08.007
24
CuiX.-L.NieJ.KuJ.DoughertyU.West-SzymanskiD. C.CollinF.et al (2020). A Human Tissue Map of 5-hydroxymethylcytosines Exhibits Tissue Specificity through Gene and Enhancer Modulation. Nat. Commun.11, 6161. 10.1038/s41467-020-20001-w
25
DaiZ.RameshV.LocasaleJ. W. (2020). The Evolving Metabolic Landscape of Chromatin Biology and Epigenetics. Nat. Rev. Genet.21, 737–753. 10.1038/s41576-020-0270-8
26
DawlatyM. M.BreilingA.LeT.BarrasaM. I.RaddatzG.GaoQ.et al (2014). Loss of Tet Enzymes Compromises Proper Differentiation of Embryonic Stem Cells. Dev. Cell29, 102–111. 10.1016/j.devcel.2014.03.003
27
DeemA. K.LiX.TylerJ. K. (2012). Epigenetic Regulation of Genomic Integrity. Chromosoma121, 131–151. 10.1007/s00412-011-0358-1
28
DelatteB.WangF.NgocL. V.CollignonE.BonvinE.DeplusR.et al (2016). Transcriptome-wide Distribution and Function of RNA Hydroxymethylcytosine. Science351, 282–285. 10.1126/science.aac5253
29
DeNizioJ. E.LiuM. Y.LeddinE. M.CisnerosG. A.KohliR. M. (2019). Selectivity and Promiscuity in TET-Mediated Oxidation of 5-Methylcytosine in DNA and RNA. Biochemistry58, 411–421. 10.1021/acs.biochem.8b00912
30
DuQ.LuuP.-L.StirzakerC.ClarkS. J. (2015). Methyl-CpG-binding Domain Proteins: Readers of the Epigenome. Epigenomics7, 1051–1073. 10.2217/epi.15.39
31
EnrothC.PoulsenL. D.IversenS.KirpekarF.AlbrechtsenA.VintherJ. (2019). Detection of Internal N7-Methylguanosine (m7G) RNA Modifications by Mutational Profiling Sequencing. Nucleic Acids Res.47, e126. 10.1093/nar/gkz736
32
EstellerM.PandolfiP. P. (2017). The Epitranscriptome of Noncoding RNAs in Cancer. Cancer Discov.7, 359–368. 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-16-1292
33
Esteve-PuigR.Bueno-CostaA.EstellerM. (2020). Writers, Readers and Erasers of RNA Modifications in Cancer. Cancer Lett.474, 127–137. 10.1016/j.canlet.2020.01.021
34
FengL.-y.YanB.-b.HuangY.-z.LiL. (2021). Abnormal Methylation Characteristics Predict Chemoresistance and Poor Prognosis in Advanced High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer. Clin. Epigenet13, 141. 10.1186/s13148-021-01133-2
35
FengY.ChenJ.-J.XieN.-B.DingJ.-H.YouX.-J.TaoW.-B.et al (2021). Direct Decarboxylation of Ten-Eleven Translocation-Produced 5-carboxylcytosine in Mammalian Genomes Forms a New Mechanism for Active DNA Demethylation. Chem. Sci.12, 11322–11329. 10.1039/d1sc02161c
36
FlamandM. N.MeyerK. D. (2019). The Epitranscriptome and Synaptic Plasticity. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol.59, 41–48. 10.1016/j.conb.2019.04.007
37
FryeM.HaradaB. T.BehmM.HeC. (2018). RNA Modifications Modulate Gene Expression during Development. Science361, 1346–1349. 10.1126/science.aau1646
38
FuL.GuerreroC. R.ZhongN.AmatoN. J.LiuY.LiuS.et al (2014). Tet-mediated Formation of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in RNA. J. Am. Chem. Soc.136, 11582–11585. 10.1021/ja505305z
39
GaoJ.LiuR.FengD.HuangW.HuoM.ZhangJ.et al (2021). Snail/PRMT5/NuRD Complex Contributes to DNA Hypermethylation in Cervical Cancer by TET1 Inhibition. Cell Death Differ.28, 2818–2836. 10.1038/s41418-021-00786-z
40
García-VílchezR.SevillaA.BlancoS. (2019). Post-transcriptional Regulation by Cytosine-5 Methylation of RNA. Biochimica Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Gene Regul. Mech.1862, 240–252. 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2018.12.003
41
GenenncherB.DurdevicZ.HannaK.ZinklD.MobinM. B.SenturkN.et al (2018). Mutations in Cytosine-5 tRNA Methyltransferases Impact Mobile Element Expression and Genome Stability at Specific DNA Repeats. Cell Rep.22, 1861–1874. 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.01.061
42
GeorgeH.UleJ.HussainS. (2017). Illustrating the Epitranscriptome at Nucleotide Resolution Using Methylation-iCLIP (miCLIP). Methods Mol. Biol.1562, 91–106. 10.1007/978-1-4939-6807-7_7
43
GinnoP. A.GaidatzisD.FeldmannA.HoernerL.ImanciD.BurgerL.et al (2020). A Genome-Scale Map of DNA Methylation Turnover Identifies Site-specific Dependencies of DNMT and TET Activity. Nat. Commun.11, 2680. 10.1038/s41467-020-16354-x
44
GkatzaN. A.CastroC.HarveyR. F.HeissM.PopisM. C.BlancoS.et al (2019). Cytosine-5 RNA Methylation Links Protein Synthesis to Cell Metabolism. PLoS Biol.17, e3000297. 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000297
45
GuoG.PanK.FangS.YeL.TongX.WangZ.et al (2021). Advances in mRNA 5-methylcytosine Modifications: Detection, Effectors, Biological Functions, and Clinical Relevance. Mol. Ther. - Nucleic Acids26, 575–593. 10.1016/j.omtn.2021.08.020
46
HanX.GuoJ.FanZ. P. (2021). Interactions between m6A Modification and miRNAs in Malignant Tumors. Cell Death Dis.12, 598. 10.1038/s41419-021-03868-5
47
HeB.ZhangC.ZhangX.FanY.ZengH.LiuJ. e.et al (2021). Tissue-specific 5-hydroxymethylcytosine Landscape of the Human Genome. Nat. Commun.12, 4249. 10.1038/s41467-021-24425-w
48
HeC.BozlerJ.JanssenK. A.WiluszJ. E.GarciaB. A.SchornA. J.et al (2021). TET2 Chemically Modifies tRNAs and Regulates tRNA Fragment Levels. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol.28, 62–70. 10.1038/s41594-020-00526-w
49
HeL.LiH.WuA.PengY.ShuG.YinG. (2019). Functions of N6-Methyladenosine and its Role in Cancer. Mol. Cancer18, 176. 10.1186/s12943-019-1109-9
50
HeY.-F.LiB.-Z.LiZ.LiuP.WangY.TangQ.et al (2011). Tet-mediated Formation of 5-carboxylcytosine and its Excision by TDG in Mammalian DNA. Science333, 1303–1307. 10.1126/science.1210944
51
HeY.ShiQ.ZhangY.YuanX.YuZ. (2020). Transcriptome-Wide 5-Methylcytosine Functional Profiling of Long Non-Coding RNA in Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Cmar12, 6877–6885. 10.2147/cmar.s262450
52
HsuP. J.ShiH.HeC. (2017). Epitranscriptomic Influences on Development and Disease. Genome Biol.18, 197. 10.1186/s13059-017-1336-6
53
HuC.LiuX.ZengY.LiuJ.WuF. (2021). DNA Methyltransferase Inhibitors Combination Therapy for the Treatment of Solid Tumor: Mechanism and Clinical Application. Clin. Epigenet13, 166. 10.1186/s13148-021-01154-x
54
HuY.ChenC.TongX.ChenS.HuX.PanB.et al (2021). NSUN2 Modified by SUMO-2/3 Promotes Gastric Cancer Progression and Regulates mRNA m5C Methylation. Cell Death Dis.12, 842. 10.1038/s41419-021-04127-3
55
HuangT.ChenW.LiuJ.GuN.ZhangR. (2019). Genome-wide Identification of mRNA 5-methylcytosine in Mammals. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol.26, 380–388. 10.1038/s41594-019-0218-x
56
HuangW.KongF.LiR.ChenX.WangK. (2022). Emerging Roles of m6A RNA Methylation Regulators in Gynecological Cancer. Front. Oncol.12, 827956. 10.3389/fonc.2022.827956
57
HuangZ.-X.LiJ.XiongQ.-P.LiH.WangE.-D.LiuR.-J. (2021). Position 34 of tRNA Is a Discriminative Element for m5C38 Modification by Human DNMT2. Nucleic Acids Res.49, 13045–13061. 10.1093/nar/gkab1148
58
HuangZ.PanJ.WangH.DuX.XuY.WangZ.et al (2021). Prognostic Significance and Tumor Immune Microenvironment Heterogenicity of m5C RNA Methylation Regulators in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. Front. Cell Dev. Biol.9, 657547. 10.3389/fcell.2021.657547
59
IbrahimJ.Op de BeeckK.FransenE.PeetersM.Van CampG. (2022). Genome-wide DNA Methylation Profiling and Identification of Potential Pan-Cancer and Tumor-specific Biomarkers. Mol. Oncol.10.1002/1878-0261.13176
60
ItoS.ShenL.DaiQ.WuS. C.CollinsL. B.SwenbergJ. A.et al (2011). Tet Proteins Can Convert 5-methylcytosine to 5-formylcytosine and 5-carboxylcytosine. Science333, 1300–1303. 10.1126/science.1210597
61
JiangQ.CrewsL. A.HolmF.JamiesonC. H. M. (2017). RNA Editing-dependent Epitranscriptome Diversity in Cancer Stem Cells. Nat. Rev. Cancer17, 381–392. 10.1038/nrc.2017.23
62
JiangX. L.LiuB. Y.NieZ.DuanL. C.XiongQ. X.JinZ. X.et al (2021). The Role of m6A Modification in the Biological Functions and Diseases. Signal Transduct. Tar6, 74. 10.1038/s41392-020-00450-x
63
JimenoS.BalestraF. R.HuertasP. (2021). The Emerging Role of RNA Modifications in DNA Double-Strand Break Repair. Front. Mol. Biosci.8, 664872. 10.3389/fmolb.2021.664872
64
JinK. X.ZuoR. J.AnastassiadisK.KlunglandA.MarrC.FilipczykA. (2021). N6-methyladenosine (m(6)A) Depletion Regulates Pluripotency Exit by Activating Signaling Pathways in Embryonic Stem Cells. P Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.118, e2105192118. 10.1073/pnas.2105192118
65
JohnR. M.RougeulleC. (2018). Developmental Epigenetics: Phenotype and the Flexible Epigenome. Front. Cell Dev. Biol.6, 130. 10.3389/fcell.2018.00130
66
KaferG. R.LiX.HoriiT.SuetakeI.TajimaS.HatadaI.et al (2016). 5-Hydroxymethylcytosine Marks Sites of DNA Damage and Promotes Genome Stability. Cell Rep.14, 1283–1292. 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.01.035
67
KanR. L.ChenJ.SallamT. (2022). Crosstalk between Epitranscriptomic and Epigenetic Mechanisms in Gene Regulation. Trends Genet.38, 182–193. 10.1016/j.tig.2021.06.014
68
KetleyR. F.GullerovaM. (2020). Jack of All Trades? The Versatility of RNA in DNA Double-Strand Break Repair. Essays Biochem.64, 721–735. 10.1042/ebc20200008
69
KharatS. S.DingX.SwaminathanD.SureshA.SinghM.SengodanS. K.et al (2020). Degradation of 5hmC-Marked Stalled Replication Forks by APE1 Causes Genomic Instability. Sci. Signal13, eaba8091. 10.1126/scisignal.aba8091
70
KharatS. S.SharanS. K. (2020). Exploring Role of 5hmC as Potential Marker of Chemoresistance. Mol. Cell. Oncol.7, 1827904. 10.1080/23723556.2020.1827904
71
KhoddamiV.CairnsB. R. (2013). Identification of Direct Targets and Modified Bases of RNA Cytosine Methyltransferases. Nat. Biotechnol.31, 458–464. 10.1038/nbt.2566
72
KimS.KaangB.-K. (2017). Epigenetic Regulation and Chromatin Remodeling in Learning and Memory. Exp. Mol. Med.49, e281. 10.1038/emm.2016.140
73
KuehnerJ. N.ChenJ.BruggemanE. C.WangF.LiY.XuC.et al (2021). 5-hydroxymethylcytosine Is Dynamically Regulated during Forebrain Organoid Development and Aberrantly Altered in Alzheimer's Disease. Cell Rep.35, 109042. 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109042
74
KumarS.ChinnusamyV.MohapatraT. (2018). Epigenetics of Modified DNA Bases: 5-Methylcytosine and Beyond. Front. Genet.9, 640. 10.3389/fgene.2018.00640
75
KumarS.MohapatraT. (2021). Deciphering Epitranscriptome: Modification of mRNA Bases Provides a New Perspective for Post-transcriptional Regulation of Gene Expression. Front. Cell Dev. Biol.9, 628415. 10.3389/fcell.2021.628415
76
LanJ.RajanN.BizetM.PenningA.SinghN. K.GuallarD.et al (2020). Functional Role of Tet-Mediated RNA Hydroxymethylcytosine in Mouse ES Cells and during Differentiation. Nat. Commun.11, 4956. 10.1038/s41467-020-18729-6
77
LeeM. P. (2019). Understanding Cancer Through the Lens of Epigenetic Inheritance, Allele-Specific Gene Expression, and High-Throughput Technology. Front. Oncol.9, 794. 10.3389/fonc.2019.00794
78
LiH.JiangH.HuangZ.ChenZ.ChenN. (2021). Prognostic Value of an m5C RNA Methylation Regulator-Related Signature for Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma. Cmar13, 6673–6687. 10.2147/cmar.s323072
79
LiH.ZhuD.WuJ.MaY.CaiC.ChenY.et al (2021). New Substrates and Determinants for tRNA Recognition of RNA Methyltransferase DNMT2/TRDMT1. RNA Biol.18, 2531–2545. 10.1080/15476286.2021.1930756
80
LiS.PengY.LandsmanD.PanchenkoA. R. (2022). DNA Methylation Cues in Nucleosome Geometry, Stability and Unwrapping. Nucleic Acids Res.50, 1864–1874. 10.1093/nar/gkac097
81
LianH.WangQ.-H.ZhuC.-B.MaJ.JinW.-L. (2018). Deciphering the Epitranscriptome in Cancer. Trends Cancer4, 207–221. 10.1016/j.trecan.2018.01.006
82
LiuJ.CuiX.JiangJ.CaoD.HeY.WangH. (2017). Uncoordinated Expression of DNA Methylation-Related Enzymes in Human Cancer. Epigenetics Chromatin.10, 61. 10.1186/s13072-017-0170-0
83
LiuJ.DouX.ChenC.ChenC.LiuC.XuM. M.et al (2020). N 6 -methyladenosine of Chromosome-Associated Regulatory RNA Regulates Chromatin State and Transcription. Science367, 580–586. 10.1126/science.aay6018
84
LiuY.SantiD. V. (2000). m5C RNA and M5C DNA Methyl Transferases Use Different Cysteine Residues as Catalysts. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.97, 8263–8265. 10.1073/pnas.97.15.8263
85
LoboJ.Barros-SilvaD.HenriqueR.JerónimoC. (2018). The Emerging Role of Epitranscriptomics in Cancer: Focus on Urological Tumors. Genes (Basel)9, 552. 10.3390/genes9110552
86
LockeW. J.GuanzonD.MaC.LiewY. J.DuesingK. R.FungK. Y. C.et al (2019). DNA Methylation Cancer Biomarkers: Translation to the Clinic. Front. Genet.10, 1150. 10.3389/fgene.2019.01150
87
LopezJ.Anazco-GuenkovaA. M.Monteagudo-GarciaO.BlancoS. (2022). Epigenetic and Epitranscriptomic Control in Prostate Cancer. Genes (Basel)13, 378. 10.3390/genes13020378
88
Lopez-BertoniH.JohnsonA.RuiY.LalB.SallS.MalloyM.et al (2022). Sox2 Induces Glioblastoma Cell Stemness and Tumor Propagation by Repressing TET2 and Deregulating 5hmC and 5mC DNA Modifications. Sig Transduct. Target Ther.7, 37. 10.1038/s41392-021-00857-0
89
López-MoyadoI. F.TsagaratouA.YuitaH.SeoH.DelatteB.HeinzS.et al (2019). Paradoxical Association of TET Loss of Function with Genome-wide DNA Hypomethylation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.116, 16933–16942. 10.1073/pnas.1903059116
90
LuY.ChanY.-T.TanH.-Y.LiS.WangN.FengY. (2020). Epigenetic Regulation in Human Cancer: the Potential Role of Epi-Drug in Cancer Therapy. Mol. Cancer.19, 79. 10.1186/s12943-020-01197-3
91
LykoF. (2018). The DNA Methyltransferase Family: a Versatile Toolkit for Epigenetic Regulation. Nat. Rev. Genet.19, 81–92. 10.1038/nrg.2017.80
92
MaJ.SongB.WeiZ.HuangD.ZhangY.SuJ.et al (2022). m5C-Atlas: a Comprehensive Database for Decoding and Annotating the 5-methylcytosine (m5C) Epitranscriptome. Nucleic Acids Res.50, D196–D203. 10.1093/nar/gkab1075
93
MatuleviciuteR.CunhaP. P.JohnsonR. S.FoskolouI. P. (2021). Oxygen Regulation of TET Enzymes. FEBS J.288, 7143–7161. 10.1111/febs.15695
94
McCarreyJ. R.LehleJ. D.RajuS. S.WangY.NilssonE. E.SkinnerM. K. (2016). Tertiary Epimutations - A Novel Aspect of Epigenetic Transgenerational Inheritance Promoting Genome Instability. PLoS One.11, e0168038. 10.1371/journal.pone.0168038
95
MendoncaA.ChangE. H.LiuW.YuanC. (2014). Hydroxymethylation of DNA Influences Nucleosomal Conformation and Stability In Vitro. Biochimica Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Gene Regul. Mech.1839, 1323–1329. 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2014.09.014
96
MeyerK. D.JaffreyS. R. (2014). The Dynamic Epitranscriptome: N6-Methyladenosine and Gene Expression Control. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.15, 313–326. 10.1038/nrm3785
97
MianoV.CodinoA.PandolfiniL.BarbieriI. (2021). The Non-coding Epitranscriptome in Cancer. Brief. Funct. Genomics20, 94–105. 10.1093/bfgp/elab003
98
MisiakB.RicceriL.SąsiadekM. M. (2019). Transposable Elements and Their Epigenetic Regulation in Mental Disorders: Current Evidence in the Field. Front. Genet.10, 580. 10.3389/fgene.2019.00580
99
MooreL. D.LeT.FanG. (2013). DNA Methylation and its Basic Function. Neuropsychopharmacol38, 23–38. 10.1038/npp.2012.112
100
MusheevM. U.BaumgärtnerA.KrebsL.NiehrsC. (2020). The Origin of Genomic N6-Methyl-Deoxyadenosine in Mammalian Cells. Nat. Chem. Biol.16, 630–634. 10.1038/s41589-020-0504-2
101
NishiyamaA.NakanishiM. (2021). Navigating the DNA Methylation Landscape of Cancer. Trends Genet.37, 1012–1027. 10.1016/j.tig.2021.05.002
102
NombelaP.Miguel-LópezB.BlancoS. (2021). The Role of m6A, m5C and Ψ RNA Modifications in Cancer: Novel Therapeutic Opportunities. Mol. Cancer20, 18. 10.1186/s12943-020-01263-w
103
NorouzitallabP.BaruahK.VanrompayD.BossierP. (2019). Can Epigenetics Translate Environmental Cues into Phenotypes?Sci. Total Environ.647, 1281–1293. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.063
104
OeyH.WhitelawE. (2014). On the Meaning of the Word 'epimutation'. Trends Genet.30, 519–520. 10.1016/j.tig.2014.08.005
105
OkamotoM.HirataS.SatoS.KogaS.FujiiM.QiG.et al (2012). Frequent Increased Gene Copy Number and High Protein Expression of tRNA (Cytosine-5-)-methyltransferase (NSUN2) in Human Cancers. DNA Cell Biol.31, 660–671. 10.1089/dna.2011.1446
106
PérezR. F.TejedorJ. R.BayónG. F.FernándezA. F.FragaM. F. (2018). Distinct Chromatin Signatures of DNA Hypomethylation in Aging and Cancer. Aging Cell17, e12744. 10.1111/acel.12744
107
PopisM. C.BlancoS.FryeM. (2016). Posttranscriptional Methylation of Transfer and Ribosomal RNA in Stress Response Pathways, Cell Differentiation, and Cancer. Curr. Opin. Oncol.28, 65–71. 10.1097/cco.0000000000000252
108
PorcelliniE.LaproviteraN.RiefoloM.RavaioliM.GarajovaI.FerracinM. (2018). Epigenetic and Epitranscriptomic Changes in Colorectal Cancer: Diagnostic, Prognostic, and Treatment Implications. Cancer Lett.419, 84–95. 10.1016/j.canlet.2018.01.049
109
QuF.TsegayP. S.LiuY. (2021). N-6-Methyladenosine, DNA Repair, and Genome Stability. Front. Mol. Biosci.8, 645823. 10.3389/fmolb.2021.645823
110
RanjanN.LeidelS. A. (2019). The Epitranscriptome in Translation Regulation: mRNA and tRNA Modifications as the Two Sides of the Same Coin?FEBS Lett.593, 1483–1493. 10.1002/1873-3468.13491
111
RengarajP.ObrdlíkA.VukićD.VaradarajanN. M.KeeganL. P.VaňáčováŠ.et al (2021). Interplays of Different Types of Epitranscriptomic mRNA Modifications. Rna Biol.18, 19–30. 10.1080/15476286.2021.1969113
112
Romero-GarciaS.Prado-GarciaH.Carlos-ReyesA. (2020). Role of DNA Methylation in the Resistance to Therapy in Solid Tumors. Front. Oncol.10, 1152. 10.3389/fonc.2020.01152
113
Ruiz de la CruzM.de la Cruz MontoyaA. H.Rojas JimenezE. A.Martinez GregorioH.Diaz VelasquezC. E.Paredes de la VegaJ.et al (2021). Cis-Acting Factors Causing Secondary Epimutations: Impact on the Risk for Cancer and Other Diseases. Cancers (Basel).13, 4807. 10.3390/cancers13194807
114
SabinoJ. C.de AlmeidaM. R.AbreuP. L.FerreiraA. M.CaldasP.DominguesM. M.et al (2022). Epigenetic Reprogramming by TET Enzymes Impacts Co-transcriptional R-Loops. Elife11, e69476. 10.7554/elife.69476
115
Sadakierska-ChudyA.KostrzewaR. M.FilipM. (2015). A Comprehensive View of the Epigenetic Landscape Part I: DNA Methylation, Passive and Active DNA Demethylation Pathways and Histone Variants. Neurotox. Res.27, 84–97. 10.1007/s12640-014-9497-5
116
SajiniA. A.ChoudhuryN. R.WagnerR. E.BornelövS.SelmiT.SpanosC.et al (2019). Loss of 5-methylcytosine Alters the Biogenesis of Vault-Derived Small RNAs to Coordinate Epidermal Differentiation. Nat. Commun.10, 2550. 10.1038/s41467-019-10020-7
117
SchaeferM.KapoorU.JantschM. F. (2017). Understanding RNA Modifications: the Promises and Technological Bottlenecks of the 'epitranscriptome'. Open Biol.7, 170077. 10.1098/rsob.170077
118
SchaeferM. R. (2021). The Regulation of RNA Modification Systems: The Next Frontier in Epitranscriptomics?Genes (Basel)12, 345. 10.3390/genes12030345
119
SchossererM.MinoisN.AngererT. B.AmringM.DellagoH.HarreitherE.et al (2015). Methylation of Ribosomal RNA by NSUN5 Is a Conserved Mechanism Modulating Organismal Lifespan. Nat. Commun.6, 6158. 10.1038/ncomms7158
120
SchumannU.ZhangH.-N.SibbrittT.PanA.HorvathA.GrossS.et al (2020). Multiple Links between 5-methylcytosine Content of mRNA and Translation. BMC Biol.18, 40. 10.1186/s12915-020-00769-5
121
ScourzicL.MoulyE.BernardO. A. (2015). TET Proteins and the Control of Cytosine Demethylation in Cancer. Genome Med.7, 9. 10.1186/s13073-015-0134-6
122
SelmiT.LanzuoloC. (2022). Driving Chromatin Organisation through N6-Methyladenosine Modification of RNA: What Do We Know and What Lies Ahead?Genes-Basel13, 340. 10.3390/genes13020340
123
SeoK. W.KleinerR. E. (2021). Mechanisms of Epitranscriptomic Gene Regulation. Biopolymers112, e23403. 10.1002/bip.23403
124
ShuklaV.Samaniego-CastruitaD.DongZ.González-AvalosE.YanQ.SarmaK.et al (2022). TET Deficiency Perturbs Mature B Cell Homeostasis and Promotes Oncogenesis Associated with Accumulation of G-Quadruplex and R-Loop Structures. Nat. Immunol.23, 99–108. 10.1038/s41590-021-01087-w
125
SongC.-X.HeC. (2013). Potential Functional Roles of DNA Demethylation Intermediates. Trends Biochem. Sci.38, 480–484. 10.1016/j.tibs.2013.07.003
126
SongH.ZhangJ.LiuB.XuJ.CaiB.YangH.et al (2022). Biological Roles of RNA m5C Modification and its Implications in Cancer Immunotherapy. Biomark. Res.10, 15. 10.1186/s40364-022-00362-8
127
SuJ.WuG.YeY.ZhangJ.ZengL.HuangX.et al (2021). NSUN2-mediated RNA 5-methylcytosine Promotes Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Progression via LIN28B-dependent GRB2 mRNA Stabilization. Oncogene40, 5814–5828. 10.1038/s41388-021-01978-0
128
SunR.DuC.LiJ.ZhouY.XiongW.XiangJ.et al (2021). Systematic Investigation of DNA Methylation Associated With Platinum Chemotherapy Resistance Across 13 Cancer Types. Front. Pharmacol.12, 616529. 10.3389/fphar.2021.616529
129
SunX.HuangX.LuX.WangN.WuD.YuanM.et al (2021). The Expression and Clinical Significance of the tRNA Aspartic Acid Methyltransferase 1 Protein in Gastric Cancer. Int. J. Clin. Oncol.26, 2229–2236. 10.1007/s10147-021-02019-2
130
SunZ.XueS.XuH.HuX.ChenS.YangZ.et al (2019). Effects of NSUN2 Deficiency on the mRNA 5-methylcytosine Modification and Gene Expression Profile in HEK293 Cells. Epigenomics11, 439–453. 10.2217/epi-2018-0169
131
SunZ.XueS.ZhangM.XuH.HuX.ChenS.et al (2020). Aberrant NSUN2-Mediated m5C Modification of H19 lncRNA Is Associated with Poor Differentiation of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Oncogene39, 6906–6919. 10.1038/s41388-020-01475-w
132
TrixlL.LusserA. (2019). The Dynamic RNA Modification 5-methylcytosine and its Emerging Role as an Epitranscriptomic Mark. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. RNA10, e1510. 10.1002/wrna.1510
133
Van HauteL.LeeS. Y.McCannB. J.PowellC. A.BansalD.VasiliauskaitėL.et al (2019). NSUN2 Introduces 5-methylcytosines in Mammalian Mitochondrial tRNAs. Nucleic Acids Res.47, 8720–8733. 10.1093/nar/gkz559
134
VincenzettiL.LeoniC.ChirichellaM.KweeI.MonticelliS. (2019). The Contribution of Active and Passive Mechanisms of 5mC and 5hmC Removal in Human T Lymphocytes Is Differentiation‐ and Activation‐dependent. Eur. J. Immunol.49, 611–625. 10.1002/eji.201847967
135
WangL.ZhangJ.SuY.MaimaitiyimingY.YangS.ShenZ.et al (2022). Distinct Roles of m5C RNA Methyltransferase NSUN2 in Major Gynecologic Cancers. Front. Oncol.12, 786266. 10.3389/fonc.2022.786266
136
WeberA. R.KrawczykC.RobertsonA. B.KuśnierczykA.VågbøC. B.SchuermannD.et al (2016). Biochemical Reconstitution of TET1-TDG-BER-dependent Active DNA Demethylation Reveals a Highly Coordinated Mechanism. Nat. Commun.7, 10806. 10.1038/ncomms10806
137
WilkinsonE.CuiY. H.HeY. Y. (2021). Context-Dependent Roles of RNA Modifications in Stress Responses and Diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci.22, 1949. 10.3390/ijms22041949
138
WillbanksA.WoodS.ChengJ. X. (2021). RNA Epigenetics: Fine-Tuning Chromatin Plasticity and Transcriptional Regulation, and the Implications in Human Diseases. Genes (Basel)12, 627. 10.3390/genes12050627
139
WuH.ZhangY. (2011). Mechanisms and Functions of Tet Protein-Mediated 5-methylcytosine Oxidation. Genes Dev.25, 2436–2452. 10.1101/gad.179184.111
140
WuH.ZhangY. (2014). Reversing DNA Methylation: Mechanisms, Genomics, and Biological Functions. Cell156, 45–68. 10.1016/j.cell.2013.12.019
141
WuX.LiG.XieR. (2018). Decoding the Role of TET Family Dioxygenases in Lineage Specification. Epigenetics Chromatin11, 58. 10.1186/s13072-018-0228-7
142
XiangS.MaY.ShenJ.ZhaoY.WuX.LiM.et al (2020). m5C RNA Methylation Primarily Affects the ErbB and PI3K-Akt Signaling Pathways in Gastrointestinal CancerC RNA Methylation Primarily Affects the ErbB and PI3K-Akt Signaling Pathways in Gastrointestinal Cancer. Front. Mol. Biosci.7, 599340. 10.3389/fmolb.2020.599340
143
XieS.ChenW.ChenK.ChangY.YangF.LinA.et al (2020). Emerging Roles of RNA Methylation in Gastrointestinal Cancers. Cancer Cell Int.20, 585. 10.1186/s12935-020-01679-w
144
XiongX.LiX.YiC. (2018). N1-methyladenosine Methylome in Messenger RNA and Non-coding RNA. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol.45, 179–186. 10.1016/j.cbpa.2018.06.017
145
XuB.WangH.TanL. (2021). Dysregulated TET Family Genes and Aberrant 5mC Oxidation in Breast Cancer: Causes and Consequences. Cancers (Basel)13, 6039. 10.3390/cancers13236039
146
XuG.-L.BochtlerM. (2020). Reversal of Nucleobase Methylation by Dioxygenases. Nat. Chem. Biol.16, 1160–1169. 10.1038/s41589-020-00675-5
147
XuQ.WangC.ZhouJ. X.XuZ. M.GaoJ.SuiP.et al (2022). Loss of TET Reprograms Wnt Signaling through Impaired Demethylation to Promote Lung Cancer Development. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.119, e2107599119. 10.1073/pnas.2107599119
148
XueC.ZhaoY.LiL. (2020). Advances in RNA Cytosine-5 Methylation: Detection, Regulatory Mechanisms, Biological Functions and Links to Cancer. Biomark. Res.8, 43. 10.1186/s40364-020-00225-0
149
XueM.ShiQ.ZhengL.LiQ.YangL.ZhangY. (2020). Gene Signatures of m5C Regulators May Predict Prognoses of Patients with Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Am. J. Transl. Res.12, 6841–6852.
150
YangH.WangY.XiangY.YadavT.OuyangJ.PhoonL.et al (2022). FMRP Promotes Transcription-Coupled Homologous Recombination via Facilitating TET1-Mediated m5C RNA Modification Demethylation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.119, e2116251119. 10.1073/pnas.2116251119
151
YangJ.BashkenovaN.ZangR.HuangX.WangJ. (2020). The Roles of TET Family Proteins in Development and Stem Cells. Development147, dev183129. 10.1242/dev.183129
152
YangX.LiuQ.-L.XuW.ZhangY.-C.YangY.JuL.-F.et al (2019). m6A Promotes R-Loop Formation to Facilitate Transcription terminationA Promotes R-Loop Formation to Facilitate Transcription Termination. Cell Res.29, 1035–1038. 10.1038/s41422-019-0235-7
153
YiJ.GaoR.ChenY.YangZ.HanP.ZhangH.et al (2017). Overexpression of NSUN2 by DNA Hypomethylation Is Associated with Metastatic Progression in Human Breast Cancer. Oncotarget8, 20751–20765. 10.18632/oncotarget.10612
154
YuanF.BiY.Siejka-ZielinskaP.ZhouY.-L.ZhangX.-X.SongC.-X. (2019). Bisulfite-free and Base-Resolution Analysis of 5-methylcytidine and 5-hydroxymethylcytidine in RNA with Peroxotungstate. Chem. Commun.55, 2328–2331. 10.1039/c9cc00274j
155
YueX.RaoA. (2020). TET Family Dioxygenases and the TET Activator Vitamin C in Immune Responses and Cancer. Blood136, 1394–1401. 10.1182/blood.2019004158
156
ZengY.WangS.GaoS.SoaresF.AhmedM.GuoH.et al (2018). Refined RIP-Seq Protocol for Epitranscriptome Analysis with Low Input Materials. PLoS Biol.16, e2006092. 10.1371/journal.pbio.2006092
157
ZhangC.ChenL.PengD.JiangA.HeY.ZengY.et al (2020). METTL3 and N6-Methyladenosine Promote Homologous Recombination-Mediated Repair of DSBs by Modulating DNA-RNA Hybrid Accumulation. Mol. Cell79, 425–442. 10.1016/j.molcel.2020.06.017
158
ZhangM.ZhaiY.ZhangS.DaiX.LiZ. (2020). Roles of N6-Methyladenosine (m6A) in Stem Cell Fate Decisions and Early Embryonic Development in Mammals. Front. Cell Dev. Biol.8, 782. 10.3389/fcell.2020.00782
159
ZhangQ.LiuF.ChenW.MiaoH.LiangH.LiaoZ.et al (2021). The Role of RNA m5C Modification in Cancer Metastasis. Int. J. Biol. Sci.17, 3369–3380. 10.7150/ijbs.61439
160
ZhangQ.ZhengQ.YuX.HeY.GuoW. (2020). Overview of Distinct 5-methylcytosine Profiles of Messenger RNA in Human Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Paired Adjacent Non-tumor Tissues. J. Transl. Med.18, 245. 10.1186/s12967-020-02417-6
161
ZhangX.GanY.ZouG.GuanJ.ZhouS. (2019). Genome-wide Analysis of Epigenetic Dynamics across Human Developmental Stages and Tissues. BMC Genomics20, 221. 10.1186/s12864-019-5472-0
162
ZhaoL.-Y.SongJ.LiuY.SongC.-X.YiC. (2020). Mapping the Epigenetic Modifications of DNA and RNA. Protein Cell11, 792–808. 10.1007/s13238-020-00733-7
163
ZhaoL.MaS.WangL.WangY.FengX.LiangD.et al (2021). A Polygenic Methylation Prediction Model Associated with Response to Chemotherapy in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer. Mol. Ther. - Oncolytics20, 545–555. 10.1016/j.omto.2021.02.012
164
ZhouK. I.ShiH.LyuR.WylderA. C.MatuszekŻ.PanJ. N.et al (2019). Regulation of Co-transcriptional Pre-mRNA Splicing by m6A through the Low-Complexity Protein hnRNPG. Mol. Cell76, 70–81. e9. 10.1016/j.molcel.2019.07.005
165
ZhouZ.LvJ.YuH.HanJ.YangX.FengD.et al (2020). Mechanism of RNA Modification N6-Methyladenosine in Human Cancer. Mol. Cancer19, 104. 10.1186/s12943-020-01216-3
166
ZhuX.WangX.YanW.YangH.XiangY.LvF.et al (2021). Ubiquitination-mediated Degradation of TRDMT1 Regulates Homologous Recombination and Therapeutic Response. Nar. Cancer3, zcab010. 10.1093/narcan/zcab010
167
ZhuZ.-M.HuoF.-C.PeiD.-S. (2020). Function and Evolution of RNA N6-Methyladenosine Modification. Int. J. Biol. Sci.16, 1929–1940. 10.7150/ijbs.45231
Summary
Keywords
DNA, RNA, m5C, hm5C, methyltransferases, demethylases, cancer, DNA damage
Citation
Alagia A and Gullerova M (2022) The Methylation Game: Epigenetic and Epitranscriptomic Dynamics of 5-Methylcytosine. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 10:915685. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2022.915685
Received
08 April 2022
Accepted
06 May 2022
Published
03 June 2022
Volume
10 - 2022
Edited by
Antonio Baonza, Centre for Molecular Biology Severo Ochoa (CSIC), Spain
Reviewed by
Tao P. Wu, Baylor College of Medicine, United States
Updates
Copyright
© 2022 Alagia and Gullerova.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Monika Gullerova, monika.gullerova@path.ox.ac.uk
This article was submitted to Cell Death and Survival, a section of the journal Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.