Abstract
While the underlying genetic alterations and biology of acute myeloid leukemia (AML), an aggressive hematologic malignancy characterized by clonal expansion of undifferentiated myeloid cells, have been gradually unraveled in the last decades, translation into clinical treatment approaches has only just begun. High relapse rates remain a major challenge in AML therapy and are to a large extent attributed to the persistence of treatment-resistant leukemic stem cells (LSCs). The Hedgehog (HH) signaling pathway is crucial for the development and progression of multiple cancer stem cell driven tumors, including AML, and has therefore gained interest as a therapeutic target. In this review, we give an overview of the major components of the HH signaling pathway, dissect HH functions in normal and malignant hematopoiesis, and specifically elaborate on the role of HH signaling in AML pathogenesis and resistance. Furthermore, we summarize preclinical and clinical HH inhibitor studies, leading to the approval of the HH pathway inhibitor glasdegib, in combination with low-dose cytarabine, for AML treatment.
Introduction
Hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) are the apex of the hierarchically organized blood cell production system giving rise to multipotent hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPCs), unipotent HPCs, and finally blood effector cells. Within the supporting bone marrow microenvironment HSCs are maintained in a delicate balance between self-renewal and differentiation to ensure life-long steady-state hematopoiesis and HPC and effector cell replenishment upon, e.g., blood loss or infections (Krenn et al., 2022). Upon transplantation into a lethally irradiated or immunosuppressed recipient mouse a single HSC, characterized by lineage negativity and high sca-1, high c-kit, low/absent CD34 and absent CD38 expression, can fully reestablish the hematopoietic system (Osawa et al., 1996). Similarly, transplantation of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patient-derived CD34+CD38− cells results in the establishment of an AML-like disease including the development of leukemic blasts (Bonnet and Dick, 1997). These seminal studies suggested a residual and skewed hematopoietic hierarchy in AML originating from a transformed leukemic stem cell (LSC). Importantly, tumor initiating cancer stem cells (CSCs), which possess the capacity to self-renew, generate all tumor cell populations, and cause relapse after chemotherapy, were also shown to exist in many other tumor entities, such as breast, skin, brain and gastrointestinal cancers (Batlle and Clevers, 2017). Due to their partially overlapping functionality, it was suggested that normal and cancer stem cells share common signaling pathways required for their maintenance and pro-longed survival (Koury et al., 2017). In this review we will specifically introduce and discuss the Hedgehog (HH) signaling pathway as such a shared but differentially utilized pathway in HSCs and AML-LSCs and elaborate on current treatment approaches aiming to abrogate HH signaling in leukemic cells.
The Hedgehog signaling pathway
The HH signaling pathway, initially discovered as a regulator of segment polarity in the fruit fly, is a highly conserved signaling cascade that regulates several aspects of embryonic development while being largely silenced in adult tissues except for i.e., stem and progenitor cell maintenance, metabolic control, inflammatory processes and tissue repair after injury (Nüsslein-Volhard and Wieschaus, 1980; Echelard et al., 1993; Ingham and McMahon, 2001; Beachy et al., 2004; Pospisilik et al., 2010; Teperino et al., 2012; Furmanski et al., 2013; Lau et al., 2021). Aberrant pathway activation has been associated with several human cancers, ranging from medulloblastoma to basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and hematological malignancies (reviewed in Teglund and Toftgård, 2010 and Abraham and Matsui, 2021). Oncogenic HH signaling contributes to several hallmarks of cancer and supports initiation, progression and metastasis of various tumor entities by impacting on the cancer cells themselves as well as by modulating the tumor supporting microenvironment (Gailani et al., 1996; Das et al., 2009; Alexaki et al., 2010; Hanahan and Weinberg, 2011; Hanna and Shevde, 2016; Riobo-Del Galdo et al., 2019; Zhang et al., 2021).
Canonical Hedgehog signaling
In mammals canonical HH signaling is initiated through binding of one of three secreted HH ligands, Sonic hedgehog (SHH), Indian hedgehog (IHH) or Desert hedgehog (DHH), to the twelve-transmembrane domain receptor Patched (PTCH) (Ingham and McMahon, 2001). In an unliganded state, PTCH is located at the base of the primary cilium, a slim hair-like organelle indispensable for canonical vertebrate HH signaling present on the surface of almost all mammalian cells, including normal blood cells (Rosenbaum and Witman, 2002; Goetz and Anderson, 2010; Singh et al., 2016). PTCH exerts its inhibitory function by antagonizing the signal transducer Smoothened (SMO), a seven transmembrane protein and member of the G-protein coupled receptor superfamily, allowing the phosphorylation of the GLI transcription factors, a process facilitated by the GLI-binding protein Suppressor of Fused (SUFU) (Ingham and McMahon, 2001; Humke et al., 2010). Subsequently, phosphorylated GLI is targeted for selective proteasomal degradation resulting in a truncated repressor form of GLI (GLIR), which translocates to the nucleus and inhibits HH-induced target gene expression (Humke et al., 2010; Gulino et al., 2012) (Figure 1A).
FIGURE 1
Activation and distinct regulatory mechanisms of Hedgehog/GLI signaling modes.
Upon binding of a HH ligand to PTCH, PTCH is inactivated by internalization in an endosome dependent manner and degradation in lysosomes (Incardona et al., 2000; Ingham and McMahon, 2001). Removal of PTCH from the primary cilium cancels PTCH-mediated repression of SMO allowing SMO activation and translocation into the primary cilium (Teglund and Toftgård, 2010; Chen et al., 2011). Activated SMO promotes accumulation of GLI at the tip of the primary cilium, GLI dissociation from SUFU and generation of full-length GLI activator (GLIA) forms. Eventually, GLIA shuttles to the nucleus where it acts as a transcription factor and induces the expression of HH target genes including regulators of cell differentiation, survival and proliferation as well as components of the HH/GLI pathway itself, such as GLI1 and PTCH1 (Humke et al., 2010; Tukachinsky et al., 2010; Aberger and Ruiz i Altaba, 2014). Importantly, HH ligands can be produced by, act on and activate HH signaling in the same cell (autocrine HH signaling) or neighboring cells (paracrine HH signaling) (Fan et al., 2004; Sanchez et al., 2004; Bhowmick and Moses, 2005; Dierks et al., 2007; Yuan et al., 2007; Hegde et al., 2008; Yauch et al., 2008; Tian et al., 2009; Amakye et al., 2013; Liu et al., 2014) (Figures 1B,C). The transcriptional outcome of HH signaling depends on the ratio of GLIA and proteolytically processed GLIR within the nucleus. Activator and repressor functions are fulfilled to varying degrees by the three different mammalian GLIs, namely GLI1, GLI2, and GLI3. While GLI1 solely acts as a transcriptional activator, GLI2 functions as both strong transcriptional activator and modest repressor if proteolytically processed. By contrast, GLI3 is mainly considered as transcriptional repressor generated by proteolytic processing, though GLI3 full-length protein can also induce target gene expression in a context-dependent manner (Sasaki et al., 1999; Park et al., 2000; Bai and Joyner, 2001; Buttitta et al., 2003; Pan et al., 2006; Ruiz i Altaba et al., 2007; Hui and Angers, 2011; Li et al., 2011).
SMO-independent Hedgehog signaling
GLIA-dependent transcription can additionally be induced and upregulated in cancer cells in a SMO-independent manner via crosstalk with and integration of oncogenic signaling and epigenetic cues (Teperino et al., 2014; Doheny et al., 2020). As shown for melanoma and colon cancer cells, the constitutive activation of RAS-RAF-MEK-ERK signaling results in increased nuclear localization and/or transcriptional activity of GLI1 and/or GLI2 (Stecca et al., 2007; Mazumdar et al., 2011). Similarly, expression, nuclear localization, protein stability and transcriptional activity of the GLI transcription factors are enhanced by the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway in, for instance, renal cell carcinoma, adeno carcinoma, lung squamous cell carcinoma, pancreatic cancer, and ovarian cancer cells (Kebenko et al., 2015; Zhou et al., 2016; Aberger et al., 2017; Kasiri et al., 2017; Singh et al., 2017). As shown in Figure 1D, several druggable non-canonical HH effectors have been identified as positive regulators of GLI proteins such as casein kinases (CSNK1, CSNK2), DYRK1, atypical PKC, SRF-MKL1, BRD4, S6K and class-I histone deacetylases. Pharmacological targeting of these effectors provides promising opportunities for the treatment of HH/GLI-associated cancers in combination with established HH-antagonists or in settings with a priori or acquired SMO-inhibitor resistance (Mao et al., 2002; Canettieri et al., 2010; Wang et al., 2012; Atwood et al., 2013; Coni et al., 2013; Tang et al., 2014; Gruber et al., 2016; Singh et al., 2017; Gruber et al., 2018; Purzner et al., 2018; Whitson et al., 2018; Peer et al., 2021) (for more details see in-depth reviews of Aberger and Ruiz i Altaba, 2014; Singh and Lauth, 2017; Peer et al., 2019; Pietrobono et al., 2019).
Hedgehog signaling in normal hematopoiesis
Although the first link between HH signaling and hematopoiesis was reported 2 decades ago, a well-defined role for HH signaling within the hematopoietic system has so far not been established (Bhardwaj et al., 2001; Lim and Matsui, 2010; Mar et al., 2011; Aberger et al., 2012). The vertebrate hematopoietic system develops in three spatially and temporally distinguishable waves during embryonic development: 1) primitive hematopoiesis, which takes place in mesoderm-derived yolk-sac blood islands and produces embryonic erythrocytes; 2) pro-definitive hematopoiesis, which originates from the yolk sac hemogenic endothelium producing bipotent HPCs required for blood cell production until birth; 3) definitive hematopoiesis, which originates from hemogenic endothelium of the yolk sac, placenta and/or aorta-gonad-mesonephros region giving rise to HSCs required for multilineage hematopoiesis. Newly generated HSCs initially seed into placenta and fetal liver for expansion and maturation and subsequently migrate to bone marrow for their maintenance ensuring life-long self-renewal and balanced blood cell production (reviewed in Krenn et al., 2022).
Already during early gastrulation HH-signaling paves the way for the initiation of hematopoiesis. Using mouse embryonic explants, it was shown that visceral-endoderm secreted IHH upregulates the expression and activity of PTCH1, SMO and GLI1 within the epiblast, thereby contributing to the generation of hemogenic and vasculogenic mesodermal cells (Farrington et al., 1997; Dyer et al., 2001). Upon antibody-based inhibition or genetic deletion of either IHH or SMO these mesodermal cells were unable to form yolk sac blood islands required for early embryonic erythropoiesis and vascularization (Byrd et al., 2002). These severe defects are only partially recapitulated in vivo as only 50% of IHH-deficient embryos die at mid-gestation (St-Jacques et al., 1999; Dyer et al., 2001). This suggests that loss of IHH is compensated by alternative HH ligands, non-canonical pathway activation or redundancy with other developmental pathways in vivo.
Possibly due to masking hematopoiesis-independent defects and/or early embryonic lethality observed in many conventional HH knockout models (Chiang et al., 1996; Mo et al., 1997; St-Jacques et al., 1999; Zhang et al., 2001; Cooper et al., 2005), we do not clearly understand the role for HH signaling in the generation and function of erythro-myeloid progenitors or HSCs prior to birth in mouse or human in vivo. However, considering that HH-mutant zebrafish embryos do not establish HSCs (Gering and Patient, 2005) and ex vivo treatment of AGM tissue explants with SHH or IHH increases HSC activity (Peeters et al., 2009), in vivo studies taking advantage of now available conditional knockout mouse models allowing for cell-type specific ablation of HH family members during development are envisioned and required for clarification.
Hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) isolated from human newborn cord blood, frequently termed primitive HSPCs, express PTCH1, SMO, SHH, IHH, GLI1, GLI2 and GLI3 mRNA (Bhardwaj et al., 2001; Kobune et al., 2004). While function-blocking antibodies targeting HH ligands reduced in vitro proliferation and differentiation of primitive HSPCs, treatment with recombinant SHH or DHH or co-culture with bone marrow-derived stromal cells secreting IHH increased their in vitro proliferation and in vivo repopulation capacity upon transplantation into nonobese-severe-combined immunodeficient (NOD-SCID) mice.
In line with these observations, adult mice harboring a heterozygous Ptch1 deletion (Ptch1+/−), which results in increased HH pathway activity, revealed an expansion of HPCs in the bone marrow under steady-state conditions compared to wild-type littermates. When treated with 5-fluorouracil, which depletes HPCs and effector cells, thereby leading to a strong activation and proliferation of HSCs (Lerner and Harrison, 1990; Wilson et al., 2008), the peripheral blood cell pool of Ptch1+/− mice recovered faster, suggesting increased HSC regenerative potential. However, as shown by serial transplantation of Ptch1+/− HSPCs, the increased HSPC proliferation resulted in reduced HSC self-renewal and maintenance (Trowbridge et al., 2006; Dierks et al., 2008). Inducible deletion of the Ptch1 gene in adult mice also increased HSPC proliferation rates but additionally resulted in a rapid decrease in T and B cell numbers, suggesting possible differentiation defects (Uhmann et al., 2007). In agreement with adult HSPCs not expressing the HH downstream transcription factors GLI1, GLI2 or GLI3 (Gao et al., 2009), PTCH1-mediated HSPC maintaining signals are not HSPC-intrinsic but provided by the HSPC supporting bone marrow microenvironment (Uhmann et al., 2007; Siggins et al., 2009).
Due to the embryonic lethality of Smo−/− mice, the role of SMO for adult hematopoiesis was analyzed in conditional knockout mouse models or by transplantation of fetal liver-derived Smo−/− HSPCs into irradiated recipient mice. These studies have, however, produced conflicting results. While conditional deletion of Smo in hematopoietic and endothelial cells using the Vav-Cre transgene significantly reduced the numbers of long-term repopulating HSCs in the bone marrow (Zhao et al., 2009), conditional deletion of Smo in hematopoietic cells, osteoblasts, and perivascular MSCs but not bone marrow endothelial cells using the inducible Mx1-Cre transgene did not alter adult hematopoiesis and HSC function under steady-state or stress (Gao et al., 2009; Hofmann et al., 2009). Similarly, hematopoiesis was restored normally after transplantation of fetal liver-derived Smo−/− HSPCs into sublethally irradiated recipient mice (Dierks et al., 2008). Reconciling this discrepancy, a unifying hypothesis could be that SMO-mediated HH signaling within endothelial cells is crucial for HSPC maintenance in bone marrow. Of note, the pharmacological inhibition of SMO with a high-affinity antagonist did not impair in vitro nor in vivo HSPC differentiation and proliferation under steady-state conditions (Hofmann et al., 2009). However, SMO-antagonist treated HSCs were not tested for their repopulation capacity in transplantation experiments.
Gli1null mice, although viable and presenting normal peripheral blood counts, display reduced HSPC proliferation, impaired myeloid differentiation, and defective 5-FU- or G-CSF-induced stress hematopoiesis. The increased quiescence of the HSPC compartment resulted in increased HSC-mediated long-term repopulation of lethally irradiated recipients upon transplantation (Merchant et al., 2010). However, considering that neither GLI1 mRNA nor protein have been detected in adult HSPCs (Gao et al., 2009), the data suggests that direct HH signaling is restricted to cells of the bone marrow microenvironment, which support HSPCs.
Together, these studies highlight a so far unappreciated role of microenvironment-mediated HH signaling for HSPC development and function. Future work will not only have to dissect the individual contribution of distinct bone marrow microenvironment components and HSPCs to HH signaling but also clarify if and how HH signaling contributes to adult hematopoiesis compared to embryonic hematopoiesis.
Acute myeloid leukemia
Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a heterogeneous clonal hematologic disorder characterized by multiple cytogenetic and molecular abnormalities leading to the production and accumulation of undifferentiated myeloid progenitors, so-called leukemic blasts, which displace the normal hematopoietic system in the bone marrow (Zhou et al., 2016). The establishment of LSCs, the source of leukemic blasts, and coinciding development of AML is a multistep process based on acquired genetic and epigenetic alterations within normal HSCs or early HPCs. Early mutations, often affecting epigenetic regulators, enhance the self-renewal potential of HSCs while simultaneously impairing differentiation causing the clonal expansion of pre-leukemic HSCs. At later disease stages mutations affect and deregulate crucial signaling pathways involved in proliferation and differentiation, thereby contributing to the full transformation of HSCs into LSCs (Corces-Zimmerman et al., 2014; Shlush et al., 2014; Vetrie et al., 2020). Within the bone marrow, LSCs hijack and remodel HSC niches to ensure not only LSC maintenance and support (Behrmann et al., 2018) but also chemoresistance (Shlush et al., 2014; Thomas and Majeti, 2017; Boyd et al., 2018). While initial studies suggested that AML-LSCs are restricted to the rare quiescent CD34+CD38− cell population, follow-up studies demonstrated that, especially in relapsed AML, LSCs are present within all bone marrow HSPC populations and, in part, highly proliferative (Iwasaki et al., 2015; Ho et al., 2016; Pollyea and Jordan, 2017). This phenotypic heterogeneity most likely reflects individual LSC subpopulations contributing to chemoresistance and relapse.
The early clinical manifestation of AML is directly attributable to the loss of functional hematopoietic effector cells with patients exhibiting fatigue, pallor, anemia, susceptibility to infections, easy bruising, or hemorrhage. Secondary organ infiltration of leukemic cells provokes the development of additional symptoms, such as splenomegaly, hepatomegaly, or lymphadenopathy (Löwenberg et al., 1999; Redaelli et al., 2003). AML is mainly a disease of the elderly with the median age at diagnosis being 68 years (Shallis et al., 2019). Besides increasing age, risk factors for the development of AML include inherited genetic disorders, elevated white blood cell count, preceding cytotoxic therapy, preceding hematologic disorders and genetic alterations (Dohner et al., 2015). Once diagnosed with AML, the 5-years survival rate is ∼29% across all AML patients and drops to ∼7% in AML patients aged 65 years and above (SEER-database, 2021). The individual patient survival, however, strongly depends on the tumor driving genetic alterations, which where therefore incorporated into the currently valid World Health Organization (WHO) and European LeukemiaNet (ELN) patient classifications and treatment recommendations for AML (Arber et al., 2016; Döhner et al., 2017; Hwang, 2020). Whereas cytogenetic profiling of large structural chromosomal abnormalities remains the backbone of AML patient classification, detection of recurrent mutations in AML, facilitated by easier access to next-generation sequencing approaches, has added an additional layer of heterogeneity among patients. The most frequently reported genetic abnormalities in AML affect the fms like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3), nucleophosmin (NPM1), DNA methyltransferase 3A (DNMT3A), isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 or 2 (IDH1, IDH2), Neuroblastoma RAS viral oncogene homolog/Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (NRAS/KRAS), runt-related transcription factor 1 (RUNX1), Tet methylcytosine dioxygenase 2 (TET2), p53, CCAAT/enhanced binding protein α (CEBPA), and/or mixed-lineage leukemia (MLL) genes (Falini et al., 2005; Marcucci et al., 2011; Ferrara and Schiffer, 2013; Ley et al., 2013). Mutations affecting FLT3, NPM1 and IDH1/2 are associated with increased leukemic cell proliferation and survival by upregulation of JAK/STAT, PI3K/AKT and/or MEK/ERK signaling (Brandts et al., 2005; Breitenbuecher et al., 2009; Marcucci et al., 2011; Heydt et al., 2018), activation of several HOX genes ensuring a stem cell-like phenotype (Alcalay et al., 2005; Verhaak et al., 2005; Heath et al., 2017) and altered genome-wide or gene-specific DNA methylation, respectively (Ley et al., 2010; Im et al., 2014; Qu et al., 2014). Importantly, mutations may co-occur or exclude each other, thereby individually or in interplay modulating AML pathways contributing to disease progression or resistance (Ley et al., 2013).
The standard induction therapy for young and/or fit AML patients has remained largely unchanged for the last decades and consists of an intense chemotherapy with 7 days of cytarabine and 3 days of an anthracycline, such as daunorubicin or idarubicin (7 + 3 regimen), resulting in about 70% of patients <60 years and less than 50% of patients >60 years achieving complete remission (CR) (Wiernik et al., 1992; Ferrara and Schiffer, 2013; Aberger et al., 2017). Once CR is achieved, consolidation therapy is mandatory to eradicate residual LSCs and avoid relapse (Cassileth et al., 1988; Ferrara and Schiffer, 2013). However, considering the heterogeneous nature of AML, a single treatment approach cannot target all AML subtypes. Therefore, more selective and personalized therapies incorporating drugs targeting mechanisms induced by recurrent AML mutations have been studied in various clinical trials and led to the approval of AML treatment regimens including hypomethylating agents (HMAs; azacitidine, decitabine), pro-apoptotic agents (venetoclax), FLT3 kinase inhibitors (gilteritinib, midostaurin, sorafenib, quizartinib, crenolanib), and IDH inhibitors (ivosidinib, enasidinib). Recently, the first HH inhibitor glasdegib was approved for combination treatment with low-dose cytarabine for AML patients who are not eligible for high-dose chemotherapy. The impressive therapeutic effect of this combination therapy underscores the clinically relevant role of HH/GLI signaling in this lethal form of leukemia (Kantarjian et al., 2021).
Hedgehog signaling in AML
Groundwork establishing HH signaling as a therapeutic target in AML include multiple studies investigating the expression of HH components in primary patient-derived whole mononuclear leukemic cells, CD34+ cells and/or bone marrow tissue. Consistent with AML heterogeneity, it was shown that the core components that mediate the HH signal response, PTCH1, SMO, GLI1, GLI2, and GLI3, are differentially expressed among AML patient samples (Bai et al., 2008; Kobune et al., 2009; Kobune et al., 2012; Wellbrock et al., 2015; Chaudhry et al., 2017). Noteworthy, increased expression of GLI2 was associated with the presence of FLT3 mutations and correlated with a significantly shortened event-free, relapse-free, and overall AML patient survival (Wellbrock et al., 2015). This finding suggests that in the context of continuous FLT3 activity GLI2 acts as a tumor promoting transcriptional activator. Consistently, AML patients harboring a high LSC frequency, identified by a high amount of GPR56 positive cells (Pabst et al., 2016), presented increased HH signaling and GLI2 activity (He et al., 2022). Similarly, increased GLI1 expression has been shown to correlate with reduced overall AML patient survival (Zhou et al., 2021).
Studies investigating the expression of HH ligands have produced conflicting results. Whereas multiple studies were able to detect SHH and/or IHH mRNA in patient-derived leukemic cells (Bai et al., 2008; Kobune et al., 2009; Kobune et al., 2012; Chaudhry et al., 2017), a study by Wellbrock and others could neither detect SHH nor IHH or DHH transcripts within the leukemic cell fraction. However, Wellbrock and others convincingly showed that DHH is produced and shed into the blood by bone marrow endothelial cells and osteoblasts (Wellbrock et al., 2015). Likewise, Kobune et al. show that AML bone marrow stroma cells upregulate expression of IHH and downregulate expression of HH-interacting protein (HHIP), a negative HH regulator and transcriptional target of HH signaling, to support leukemic cell proliferation. Pretreatment with azacitidine induced demethylation of the HHIP gene, partially restored HHIP expression, and reduced the leukemia promoting effect of the primary AML stromal cells (Chuang and McMahon, 1999; Kobune et al., 2012) (Figure 2). Taken together, these datasets suggest a paracrine and tumor promoting interaction between leukemic cells and the bone marrow microenvironment via the HH signaling pathway.
FIGURE 2
Model of oncogenic Hedgehog/GLI signaling in AML and its possible therapeutic targeting.
Preclinical in vitro studies targeting Hedgehog signaling in AML
Functionally, several in vitro studies have shown a correlation between HH signaling and AML cell resistance to chemotherapy and radiation. Inhibition of HH signaling using cyclopamine, GANT61, recombinant HHIP or anti-hedgehog neutralizing antibodies resulted in increased apoptosis, reduced proliferation, and restored chemosensitivity to cytarabine of CD34+ but not CD34− leukemic cell lines or primary AML cells (Kobune et al., 2009; Long et al., 2016). Interestingly, the targeting of GLI1 with GANT61 resulted in myeloid differentiation of the CD34− AML cell fraction (Long et al., 2016). Further evidence for the contribution of HH signaling in drug resistance was obtained by Zahreddine and others who analyzed leukemic blasts from relapsed patients treated with ribavirin, an inhibitor of the eukaryotic translation initiation factor eIF4E. In this study, UDP glucuronosyltransferase (UGT1A), an enzyme capable of inactivating ribavirin and cytarabine by glucuronidation and increasing chemoresistance, was significantly upregulated in a GLI1-dependent manner (Zahreddine et al., 2014).
Activation of the HH pathway, characterized by increased expression of SMO and GLI1, was identified in myeloid cell lines with acquired radiation and drug resistance. Upon inhibition of HH signaling with the SMO antagonist sonidegib (LDE225), these cells were resensitized to irradiation by downregulation of the PI3K/AKT/NFκB and DNA repair pathways (Li et al., 2016). This is in line with a recent study by Zhou et al. showing that overexpression of GLI1 promotes chemotherapy resistance and leukemic cell proliferation via upregulation of cell cycle regulators, such as cyclin D and cyclin-dependent kinases (CDK) and PI3K/AKT signaling. Combined inhibition of GLI1 and CDK4/6 synergistically promoted cytarabine sensitivity in cell lines and AML patient samples. RNA sequencing data from relapsed AML patient-derived bone marrow samples further confirmed that GLI1, PTCH1, SMO, and components of the PI3K/AKT signaling cascade were upregulated in relapsed AML patients compared to AML patients achieving complete remission. Furthermore, patients with high expression of GLI1, PIK3R1, and AKT3 had reduced overall survival (Zhou et al., 2021). In contrast to these studies highlighting that increased GLI1 expression contributes to AML pathophysiology, GLI3 expression seems to be actively downregulated in AML patients by epigenetic silencing to not only reduce GLI3R HH repressor function (Chaudhry et al., 2017) but also upregulate the cytarabine chemoresistance-inducing genes SAMHD1, CDA, and MRP8 (Freisleben et al., 2020). HMA decitabine-induced GLI3R re-expression resulted in decreased GLI1 expression levels in AML cell lines and increased their sensitivity to the SMO inhibitor glasdegib, thereby reducing AML cell viability and proliferation (Chaudhry et al., 2017). Further studies supporting the idea of dual inhibition of HH and epigenetic regulators suggest combination therapy of the histone deacetylase inhibitor vorinostat and the SMO inhibitor SANT-1 or the BRD4 inhibitor ZEN-3365 and the GLI1-inhibitor GANT61, both resulting in increased apoptosis and reduced proliferation of AML cells (Hay et al., 2017; Wellbrock et al., 2021) (Figure 2).
Preclinical in vivo studies targeting Hedgehog signaling in AML
Using AML xenograft models, it was shown that in vivo application of glasdegib was unable to eradicate the bulk tumor cells but specifically targeted re-transplantable and self-renewing LSCs. Dissecting the underlying mechanism in vitro, Fukushima et al. showed that glasdegib reduces the LSC-containing CD34+CD38− population and increases the proliferative cell fraction in patient-derived AML samples. Glasdegib treatment also resensitized MOLM-14 AML cells to cytarabine and the FLT3-kinase inhibitor sunitinib (Fukushima et al., 2016). Similarly, the GLI1 inhibitor GANT61 in combination with the FLT3-kinase inhibitor sunitinib and PI3K-inhibitor PF-04691502 was shown to downregulate GLI1 expression in and reduce the proliferation and survival of FLT3-mutated AML cells, thereby prolonging the survival of AML xenografts (Latuske et al., 2017). Conclusively, in a FLT3-ITD-driven AML mouse model concomitant, constitutive activation of HH signaling promoted the expansion of myeloid HPCs via activation of STAT5 signaling leading to accelerated AML development. Combined SMO and FLT3 kinase inhibition using saridegib and sorafenib curbed leukemic cell growth and prolonged AML mouse survival (Lim et al., 2015) (Figure 2).
Apart from the well-established GLI and SMO inhibitors, the naturally occurring small molecule triptonide was recently shown to downregulate GLI2 and FLT3 protein expression and to induce apoptosis and inhibit proliferation of FLT3-ITD+ AML cells in a dose dependent manner. Treatment of MOLM-13 transplanted AML xenografts with increasing dosages of triptonide significantly reduced the in vivo tumor burden (Xu et al., 2021).
In summary, these studies demonstrate that increased HH pathway activation is associated with poor prognosis and increased resistance to conventional treatment approaches in AML. Therefore, rational combinations of HH inhibitors with established therapeutic agents targeting the leukemic cell population represent a promising strategy to improve CR rates in chemonaïve and relapsed AML patients.
Clinical trials targeting Hedgehog signaling in AML
Therapeutic targeting of HH signaling has been explored for various cancer entities over the last decades with most studies focusing on the inhibition of SMO. The first discovered SMO inhibitor was the naturally occurring alkaloid cyclopamine that has been extensively studied but failed clinical entrance due to poor solubility, bioavailability, and off-target effects. Intensive efforts to improve pharmacokinetics facilitated the development of clinically suited SMO antagonists such as vismodegib, sonidegib and glasdegib (Jamieson et al., 2020).
Vismodegib
Vismodegib (Erivedge, GDC-0449) was the first HH pathway inhibitor approved by the FDA for the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic BCC in 2012 (Axelson et al., 2013). A single-arm, open-label phase Ib study assessing the safety and efficacy of vismodegib in patients with relapsed AML was terminated due to lack of efficacy (NCT01880437) (Table 1). Although the drug was well-tolerated, with the most common adverse events (AE) being fever, nausea, taste distortion and nosebleed, all patients discontinued treatment because of disease progression (Bixby et al., 2019). Study failure may be attributed to the use of vismodegib as a single agent as preclinical studies suggested a beneficial effect of vismodegib administration during chemotherapy. Despite promising in vitro data (Zahreddine et al., 2014), no data from clinical studies combining vismodegib with chemotherapy in AML patients is available to date.
TABLE 1
| SMO inhibitor | SMO inhibitor dosage | Combination | (Preliminary) Results | Clinical trial | Phase | Status | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vismodegib | 150 mg/day | Ribavirin, decitabine | — | NCT02073838 | II | Unknown | — |
| 150 mg/day | (Cytarabine) | Vismodegib well-tolerated; lower-than-expected efficacy for vismodegib monotherapy; no combination therapy performed | NCT01880437 | Ib/II | Terminated | Bixby et al. (2019) | |
| Not defined | Not defined | — | NCT03878524 | Ib | Recruiting | — | |
| Sonidegib | 2 × 400 mg/day or 800 mg/day | — | 100% of patients experienced ≥1 AE, 71% of patients experienced serious AEs; low CR rate (1.45% of patients), disease progression in 62% of patients | NCT01826214 | II | Completed | — |
| 400 mg/day | Azacitidine | AEs within the expected range; remission rates comparable to azacitidine monotherapy, promising progression-free and overall survival | NCT02129101 | I/Ib | Completed | Tibes et al. (2017) | |
| Glasdegib | 5, 10, 20, 40, 80, 120, 180, 270, 400 or 600 mg/day | - | Established MTD: 400 mg/day; AEs within the expected range; two patients experienced DLT (80 and 600 mg/day); clinical activity in 49% of patients | NCT00953758 | I | Completed | Martinelli et al. (2015a) |
| 25, 50 or 100 mg/day | LDAC, azacitidine, cytarabine/daunorubicin | Glasdegib + LDAC, well-tolerated; glasdegib + azacitidine, well-tolerated; glasdegib + cytarabine/daunorubicin, manageable despite increased severe AEs; low remission rates in glasdegib only cohort, increased in combination cohorts | NCT02038777 | I | Active | Minami et al. (2017) | |
| Ib: 100 or 200 mg/day; II: 100 mg/day | LDAC, decitabine, cytarabine/daunorubicin | Phase Ib: glasdegib in combination with LDAC or decitabine, well-tolerated; glasdegib + cytarabine/daunorubicin, increased severe AEs, manageable; 31% remission rate across all groups; Phase II: Glasdegib + cytarabine/daunorubicin, high CR rate; glasdegib + LDAC, drastically improved CR rate and OS in combination compared to LDAC only (17 vs 2.3% and 8.8 vs. 4.9 months) | NCT01546038 | Ib/II | Completed | Cortes et al. (2016); Cortes et al. (2018); Savona et al. (2018); Cortes et al. (2019b) | |
| 100 mg/day | Azacitidine | Well-tolerated; 20% of AML patients achieved CR | NCT02367456 | Ib | Completed | Sekeres et al. (2019) | |
| — | Cytarabine/daunorubicin, azacitidine | No improvement of OS through addition of glasdegib | NCT03416179 | III | Completed | Cortes et al. (2019a) | |
| 50, 75 or 100 mg/day | Azacitidine | — | NCT04842604 | III | Active | — | |
| Not defined | Bosutinib, decitabine, enasidenib, ivosidenib, venetoclax, gilteritinib | — | NCT04655391 | Pilot/Ib | Withdrawn | — | |
| 100 mg/daily | CPX-351 (cytarabine/daunorubicin) | — | NCT04231851 | II | Recruiting | — | |
| 100 mg/day | Gemtuzumab ozogamicin | — | NCT04168502 | III | Recruiting | — | |
| 100 mg/day | Decitabine | — | NCT04051996 | II | Terminated | — | |
| 100 mg/day | Gemtuzumab ozogamicin | — | NCT04093505 | III | Recruiting | — | |
| Not defined | Gemtuzumab ozogamicin | — | NCT03390296 | Ib/II | Active | — | |
| 100 mg/day | Decitabine, azacitidine, venetoclax | — | NCT03226418 | II | Recruiting | — |
SMO inhibitors in clinical trials for the treatment of AML.
AE, adverse event; CR, complete remission; DLT, dose-limiting toxicity; LDAC, low-dose cytarabine; MTD, maximum-tolerated dose; OS, overall survival.
Sonidegib
Sonidegib (Erismodegib, LDE225, Odomzo) is the second SMO inhibitor approved for treatment of advanced BCC and is currently being investigated for treatment of other cancers (Casey et al., 2017). Although in vitro assays demonstrated a synergistic effect between sonidegib and azacytidine in AML, combination treatment resulted in promising progression-free and overall patient survival rates but surprisingly did not enhance complete remission rates in AML patients in a phase I/Ib study (NCT02129101) (Tibes et al., 2015; Tibes et al., 2017). In a phase II study evaluating the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of sonidegib in relapsed AML (NCT01826214), all patients experienced at least 1 AE and over 70% of the patients experienced serious AEs such as febrile neutropenia, general physical health deterioration, pyrexia, asthenia, anemia, pneumonia, sepsis, increased creatine phosphokinase, and epistaxis. While around 18% of patients discontinued treatment due to these AEs, 62% of patients had a progressing AML under sonidegib treatment, which also resulted in treatment termination.
Glasdegib
After clinical trials for the use of previously approved SMO inhibitors in AML therapy failed, glasdegib (PF-04449913, Daurismo) in combination with low-dose cytarabine (LDAC) was the first SMO inhibitor to receive FDA approval for the treatment of AML at the end of 2018.
As determined during safety and pharmacokinetic profiling of orally applied glasdegib, the maximum tolerated dose was 400 mg per day with a mean plasma half-life of 24 h. In light of the commonly observed AEs, such as taste distortion, decreased appetite and hair loss, the recommended dose was lowered to below 200 mg per day (NCT00953758) (Martinelli et al., 2015b). Combination of glasdegib with standard of care treatments was assessed in a phase Ib study (NCT01546038) in patients with AML or high-risk MDS. Newly diagnosed patients ineligible for intensive induction therapy received glasdegib with LDAC (group A) or decitabine (group B), whereas fit patients received glasdegib with cytarabine and daunorubicin (group C). The CR/CR with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi) rate was 31% across all patients, 9% in group A, 29% in group B and 55% in group C. Median overall survival (OS) was 4.4 months in group A, 11.5 months in group B and 34.7 months in group C. All treatment arms were generally well-tolerated with low grade AEs. Whereas most AEs were consistent with AML-related complications during standard-of-care therapy, glasdegib treatment-related muscle spasms, dysgeusia, and alopecia were also observed. Of note and in line with the clinical trial NCT02038777, severe AEs were frequently observed but manageable in patients receiving glasdegib in combination with cytarabine and daunorubicin. As the maximum administered dose (MTD) was not reached for glasdegib within this study, the recommended phase II dose for glasdegib of 100 mg per day was based on the observed tolerability for the combination therapy (glasdegib + LDAC or intensive chemotherapy), successful inhibition of HH signaling, and glasdegib pharmacokinetics (Savona et al., 2018). A subsequent phase II study (NCT01546038) evaluating the efficacy of 100 mg daily glasdegib administered in combination with standard cytarabine and daunorubicin chemotherapy in patients with untreated AML or high-risk MDS revealed that 46.4% of all patients achieved CR and increased the median OS to 14.9 months. While the most common treatment-related AEs were tolerable diarrhea and nausea, around 20% of patients had to discontinue treatment due to treatment-related pneumonia or sepsis. Importantly, there were no significant associations between recurrent AML mutations and clinical response (Cortes et al., 2018). Unfortunately, preliminary data from a phase III trial investigating the outcome of patients receiving glasdegib in combination with cytarabine and daunorubicin suggest no improvement of patient overall survival (17.3 months OS for glasdegib + cytarabine/daunorubicin and 20.4 months OS for cytarabine/daunorubicin; NCT03416179). In a simultaneously conducted second phase II study (BRIGHT AML 1003, NCT01546038) LDAC with or without glasdegib was evaluated in patients with untreated AML or high-risk MDS ineligible for intensive chemotherapy. 20 mg LDAC was administered on 10 days per 28-days cycle with or without 100 mg glasdegib daily for 28 days. Impressively, 15 patients (17%) achieved CR under LDAC + glasdegib therapy compared to only 1 patient (2.3%) in the LDAC-only group. Median OS was 8.8 and 4.9 months for LDAC + glasdegib and LDAC treatment, respectively. The most common non-hematologic sever AEs were pneumonia, fatigue, dyspnea, hyponatremia, sepsis and syncope in the LDAC + glasdegib arm and pneumonia in the LDAC-only arm. Despite the high frequency of sever AEs (80%), the safety profile was considered manageable and a favorable benefit-risk profile was demonstrated with this study, thereby leading to the FDA approval of glasdegib in combination with LDAC for the treatment of newly diagnosed AML patients unsuitable for intensive induction chemotherapy (Cortes et al., 2016; Cortes et al., 2019b). Post hoc analysis of this study further revealed a clinical benefit even for LDAC + glasdegib treated patients who did not achieve CR and confirmed the prolonged median OS for patients who achieved CR (26.1 months LDAC + glasdegib; 12.9 months LDAC-only) (Cortes et al., 2020). Noteworthy, the superior clinical efficacy of LDAC combined with glasdegib compared to LDAC-only was observed for all cytogenetic risk groups. Furthermore, a subgroup analysis revealed a more pronounced survival benefit of LDAC + glasdegib in patients with secondary AML and relapsed AML patients not receiving HMA therapy (Heuser et al., 2021). Overall, the BRIGHT AML 1003 trial applying LDAC in combination with glasdegib demonstrated impressive clinical efficacy in difficult to treat patients. Further studies evaluating the combination of glasdegib with various drugs are ongoing or planned (Table 1). Hence the acquisition of resistance mechanisms upon HMA monotherapy and the success of combination treatments with an HMA backbone, the results of trials combining SMO inhibitors with either azacitidine or decitabine are eagerly awaited. Preliminary data obtained from studies (NCT02367456 and NCT03416179) evaluating clinical efficacy of glasdegib in combination with azacitidine in untreated AML patients suggested improved CR rates. However, first analysis of patient overall survival data revealed no beneficial effect of adding glasdegib (10.3 months OS for glasdegib + azacitidine and 10.6 months OS for azacitidine) (Cortes et al., 2019a; Sekeres et al., 2019). A more detailed analysis of the partially available data is required for further conclusions.
The combination of glasdegib with already established inhibitors targeting IDH1/2, BCL-2 or FLT3 in AML are obviously of high interest and have been incorporated into a clinical trial draft (NCT04655391). Unfortunately, this study was stopped prior to patient enrollment due to limited drug availability. An additional AML study investigating the combinational effect of glasdegib with, e.g., venetoclax on CR rate and mortality is currently recruiting patients (NCT03226418).
Conclusion and outlook
Adapting AML treatment to a patient’s individual needs requires a growing arsenal of small molecule inhibitors, HMAs, and chemotherapeutic agents to simultaneously target multiple oncogenic pathways and tumor-promoting processes. As reviewed here, successful preclinical and clinical AML studies inhibiting HH signaling have recently led to the FDA approval of the SMO inhibitor glasdegib in combination with LDAC for the treatment of newly diagnosed and unfit AML patients. Ongoing clinical trials are further evaluating the benefit of SMO inhibitor combination therapies with HMAs, IDH inhibitors, tyrosine kinase inhibitors and/or pyrimidine analogues. These studies will reveal if and how AML patient subgroups benefit from HH inhibiting treatment approaches and position glasdegib and other HH inhibitors in the landscape of AML therapy. Furthermore, combination therapies targeting canonical and non-canonical HH signaling simultaneously are envisioned and might offer new therapeutic approaches preventing the development of drug resistance. Although the clinical efficacy of glasdegib is undeniable, the exact tumor targeting mechanism of HH signal inhibition in AML is still not clear. Whether the anti-leukemic effects are exclusively attributable to abrogating AML (stem) cell intrinsic HH signaling or to blocking HH signaling within the tumor supporting bone marrow microenvironment remains to be clarified and calls for a more detailed analysis of HH signaling components and regulators in AML patient-derived blasts, LSCs and bone marrow stromal and endothelial cells. This will also be crucial for the identification of biomarkers predictive for HH inhibitor response of AML patients.
Statements
Author contributions
ST, PWK, and FA wrote and revised the manuscript. PWK designed the figures. All authors read and approved the submitted version.
Funding
This research was supported by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF; grant number W1213), the Cancer Cluster Salzburg (projects 20102-P1601064-FPR01-2017 and 20102-F2001080-FPR), the Biomed Center Salzburg (project 20102-F1901165-KZP), the EU Interreg grant EPIC ITAT1054 and the priority program Allergy-Cancer-Bionano Research Center of the University of Salzburg.
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful to all members of the Aberger lab and the Cancer Cluster Salzburg for the fruitful discussions and collaborations. This research was supported by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF; grant number W1213), the Cancer Cluster Salzburg (projects 20102-P1601064-FPR01-2017 and 20102-F2001080-FPR), the Biomed Center Salzburg (project 20102-F1901165-KZP), the EU Interreg grant EPIC ITAT1054 and the priority program Allergy-Cancer-Bionano Research Center of the University of Salzburg. Figures were created with BioRender.com software under license agreement numbers TG23WT3J2Q and CE23WT3VFT.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1
AbergerF.HuttererE.SternbergC.Del BurgoP. J.HartmannT. N. (2017). Acute myeloid leukemia - strategies and challenges for targeting oncogenic Hedgehog/GLI signaling. Cell. Commun. Signal.15 (1), 8. 10.1186/s12964-017-0163-4
2
AbergerF.KernD.GreilR.HartmannT. N. (2012). Canonical and noncanonical Hedgehog/GLI signaling in hematological malignancies. Vitam. Horm.88, 25–54. 10.1016/b978-0-12-394622-5.00002-x
3
AbergerF.Ruiz i AltabaA. (2014). Context-dependent signal integration by the GLI code: The oncogenic load, pathways, modifiers and implications for cancer therapy. Semin. Cell. Dev. Biol.33, 93–104. 10.1016/j.semcdb.2014.05.003
4
AbrahamA.MatsuiW. (2021). Hedgehog signaling in myeloid malignancies. Cancers (Basel)13 (19), 4888. 10.3390/cancers13194888
5
AlcalayM.TiacciE.BergomasR.BigernaB.VenturiniE.MinardiS. P.et al (2005). Acute myeloid leukemia bearing cytoplasmic nucleophosmin (NPMc+ AML) shows a distinct gene expression profile characterized by up-regulation of genes involved in stem-cell maintenance. Blood106 (3), 899–902. 10.1182/blood-2005-02-0560
6
AlexakiV.-I.JavelaudD.van KempenL. C. L.MohammadK. S.DennlerS.LucianiF.et al (2010). GLI2-mediated melanoma invasion and metastasis. J. Natl. Cancer Inst.102 (15), 1148–1159. 10.1093/jnci/djq257
7
AmakyeD.JaganiZ.DorschM. (2013). Unraveling the therapeutic potential of the Hedgehog pathway in cancer. Nat. Med.19 (11), 1410–1422. 10.1038/nm.3389
8
ArberD. A.OraziA.HasserjianR.ThieleJ.BorowitzM. J.Le BeauM. M.et al (2016). The 2016 revision to the World Health Organization classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia. Blood127 (20), 2391–2405. 10.1182/blood-2016-03-643544
9
AtwoodS. X.LiM.LeeA.TangJ. Y.OroA. E. (2013). GLI activation by atypical protein kinase C ι/λ regulates the growth of basal cell carcinomas.Nature494 (7438), 484–488. 10.1038/nature11889
10
AxelsonM.LiuK.JiangX.HeK.WangJ.ZhaoH.et al (2013). U.S. Food and drug administration approval: Vismodegib for recurrent, locally advanced, or metastatic basal cell carcinoma. Clin. Cancer Res.19 (9), 2289–2293. 10.1158/1078-0432.Ccr-12-1956
11
BaiC. B.JoynerA. L. (2001). Gli1 can rescue the in vivo function of Gli2. Development128 (24), 5161–5172. 10.1242/dev.128.24.5161
12
BaiL.-Y.ChiuC.-F.LinC.-W.HsuN.-Y.LinC.-L.LoW.-J.et al (2008). Differential expression of Sonic hedgehog and Gli1 in hematological malignancies. Leukemia22 (1), 226–228. 10.1038/sj.leu.2404978
13
BatlleE.CleversH. (2017). Cancer stem cells revisited. Nat. Med.23 (10), 1124–1134. 10.1038/nm.4409
14
BeachyP. A.KarhadkarS. S.BermanD. M. (2004). Tissue repair and stem cell renewal in carcinogenesis. Nature432 (7015), 324–331. 10.1038/nature03100
15
BehrmannL.WellbrockJ.FiedlerW. (2018). Acute myeloid leukemia and the bone marrow niche-take a closer look. Front. Oncol.8, 444. 10.3389/fonc.2018.00444
16
BhardwajG.MurdochB.WuD.BakerD. P.WilliamsK. P.ChadwickK.et al (2001). Sonic hedgehog induces the proliferation of primitive human hematopoietic cells via BMP regulation. Nat. Immunol.2 (2), 172–180. 10.1038/84282
17
BhowmickN. A.MosesH. L. (2005). Tumor-stroma interactions. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev.15 (1), 97–101. 10.1016/j.gde.2004.12.003
18
BixbyD.NoppeneyR.LinT. L.CortesJ.KrauterJ.YeeK.et al (2019). Safety and efficacy of vismodegib in relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukaemia: Results of a phase Ib trial. Br. J. Haematol.185 (3), 595–598. 10.1111/bjh.15571
19
BonnetD.DickJ. E. (1997). Human acute myeloid leukemia is organized as a hierarchy that originates from a primitive hematopoietic cell. Nat. Med.3 (7), 730–737. 10.1038/nm0797-730
20
BoydA. L.AslostovarL.ReidJ.YeW.TanasijevicB.PorrasD. P.et al (2018). Identification of chemotherapy-induced leukemic-regenerating cells reveals a transient vulnerability of human AML recurrence. Cancer Cell.34 (3), 483–498. e485. 10.1016/j.ccell.2018.08.007
21
BrandtsC. H.SarginB.RodeM.BiermannC.LindtnerB.SchwäbleJ.et al (2005). Constitutive activation of Akt by Flt3 internal tandem duplications is necessary for increased survival, proliferation, and myeloid transformation. Cancer Res.65 (21), 9643–9650. 10.1158/0008-5472.Can-05-0422
22
BreitenbuecherF.SchnittgerS.GrundlerR.MarkovaB.CariusB.BrechtA.et al (2009). Identification of a novel type of ITD mutations located in nonjuxtamembrane domains of the FLT3 tyrosine kinase receptor. Blood113 (17), 4074–4077. 10.1182/blood-2007-11-125476
23
ButtittaL.MoR.HuiC.-C.FanC.-M. (2003). Interplays of Gli2 and Gli3 and their requirement in mediating Shh-dependent sclerotome induction. Dev. Camb. Engl.130 (25), 6233–6243. 10.1242/dev.00851
24
ByrdN.BeckerS.MayeP.NarasimhaiahR.St-JacquesB.ZhangX.et al (2002). Hedgehog is required for murine yolk sac angiogenesis. Development129 (2), 361–372. 10.1242/dev.129.2.361
25
CanettieriG.Di MarcotullioL.GrecoA.ConiS.AntonucciL.InfanteP.et al (2010). Histone deacetylase and Cullin3-REN(KCTD11) ubiquitin ligase interplay regulates Hedgehog signalling through Gli acetylation. Nat. Cell. Biol.12 (2), 132–142. 10.1038/ncb2013
26
CaseyD.DemkoS.ShordS.ZhaoH.ChenH.HeK.et al (2017). FDA approval summary: Sonidegib for locally advanced basal cell carcinoma. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-2051
27
CassilethP. A.HarringtonD. P.HinesJ. D.OkenM. M.MazzaJ. J.McGlaveP.et al (1988). Maintenance chemotherapy prolongs remission duration in adult acute nonlymphocytic leukemia. J. Clin. Oncol.6 (4), 583–587. 10.1200/jco.1988.6.4.583
28
ChaudhryP.SinghM.TricheT. J.GuzmanM.MerchantA. A. (2017). GLI3 repressor determines Hedgehog pathway activation and is required for response to SMO antagonist glasdegib in AML. Blood129 (26), 3465–3475. 10.1182/blood-2016-05-718585
29
ChenY.SasaiN.MaG.YueT.JiaJ.BriscoeJ.et al (2011). Sonic Hedgehog dependent phosphorylation by CK1α and GRK2 is required for ciliary accumulation and activation of smoothened. PLoS Biol.9 (6), e1001083. 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001083
30
ChiangC.LitingtungY.LeeE.YoungK. E.CordenJ. L.WestphalH.et al (1996). Cyclopia and defective axial patterning in mice lacking Sonic hedgehog gene function. Nature383 (6599), 407–413. 10.1038/383407a0
31
ChuangP. T.McMahonA. P. (1999). Vertebrate Hedgehog signalling modulated by induction of a Hedgehog-binding protein. Nature397 (6720), 617–621. 10.1038/17611
32
ConiS.AntonucciL.D'AmicoD.Di MagnoL.InfanteP.De SmaeleE.et al (2013). Gli2 acetylation at lysine 757 regulates hedgehog-dependent transcriptional output by preventing its promoter occupancy. PLoS One8 (6), e65718. 10.1371/journal.pone.0065718
33
CooperA. F.YuK. P.BruecknerM.BraileyL. L.JohnsonL.McGrathJ. M.et al (2005). Cardiac and CNS defects in a mouse with targeted disruption of suppressor of fused. Development132 (19), 4407–4417. 10.1242/dev.02021
34
Corces-ZimmermanM. R.HongW.-J.WeissmanI. L.MedeirosB. C.MajetiR. (2014). Preleukemic mutations in human acute myeloid leukemia affect epigenetic regulators and persist in remission. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.111 (7), 2548–2553. 10.1073/pnas.1324297111
35
CortesJ. E.DombretH.MerchantA.TauchiT.DiRienzoC. G.SleightB.et al (2019a). Glasdegib plus intensive/nonintensive chemotherapy in untreated acute myeloid leukemia: BRIGHT AML 1019 phase III trials. Future Oncol.15 (31), 3531–3545. 10.2217/fon-2019-0373
36
CortesJ. E.Douglas SmithB.WangE. S.MerchantA.OehlerV. G.ArellanoM.et al (2018). Glasdegib in combination with cytarabine and daunorubicin in patients with AML or high-risk MDS: Phase 2 study results. Am. J. Hematol.93 (11), 1301–1310. 10.1002/ajh.25238
37
CortesJ. E.HeidelF. H.FiedlerW.SmithB. D.RobakT.MontesinosP.et al (2020). Survival outcomes and clinical benefit in patients with acute myeloid leukemia treated with glasdegib and low-dose cytarabine according to response to therapy. J. Hematol. Oncol.13 (1), 92. 10.1186/s13045-020-00929-8
38
CortesJ. E.HeidelF. H.HellmannA.FiedlerW.SmithB. D.RobakT.et al (2019b). Randomized comparison of low dose cytarabine with or without glasdegib in patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia or high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome. Leukemia33 (2), 379–389. 10.1038/s41375-018-0312-9
39
CortesJ. E.HeidelF. H.HeuserM.FiedlerW.SmithB. D.RobakT.et al (2016). A phase 2 randomized study of low dose ara-C with or without glasdegib (PF-04449913) in untreated patients with acute myeloid leukemia or high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome. Blood128 (22), 99. 10.1182/blood.V128.22.99.99
40
DasS.HarrisL. G.MetgeB. J.LiuS.RikerA. I.SamantR. S.et al (2009). The hedgehog pathway transcription factor GLI1 promotes malignant behavior of cancer cells by up-regulating osteopontin. J. Biol. Chem.284 (34), 22888–22897. 10.1074/jbc.M109.021949
41
DierksC.BeigiR.GuoG.-R.ZirlikK.StegertM. R.ManleyP.et al (2008). Expansion of Bcr-Abl-positive leukemic stem cells is dependent on Hedgehog pathway activation. Cancer Cell.14 (3), 238–249. 10.1016/j.ccr.2008.08.003
42
DierksC.GrbicJ.ZirlikK.BeigiR.EnglundN. P.GuoG.-R.et al (2007). Essential role of stromally induced hedgehog signaling in B-cell malignancies. Nat. Med.13 (8), 944–951. 10.1038/nm1614
43
DohenyD.ManoreS. G.WongG. L.LoH.-W. (2020). Hedgehog signaling and truncated GLI1 in cancer. Cells9 (9), E2114. 10.3390/cells9092114
44
DöhnerH.EsteyE.GrimwadeD.AmadoriS.AppelbaumF. R.BüchnerT.et al (2017). Diagnosis and management of AML in adults: 2017 ELN recommendations from an international expert panel. Blood129 (4), 424–447. 10.1182/blood-2016-08-733196
45
DohnerH.WeisdorfD. J.BloomfieldC. D. (2015). Acute myeloid leukemia. N. Engl. J. Med.373 (12), 1136–1152. 10.1056/NEJMra1406184
46
DyerM. A.FarringtonS. M.MohnD.MundayJ. R.BaronM. H. (2001). Indian hedgehog activates hematopoiesis and vasculogenesis and can respecify prospective neurectodermal cell fate in the mouse embryo. Development128 (10), 1717–1730. 10.1242/dev.128.10.1717
47
EchelardY.EpsteinD. J.St-JacquesB.ShenL.MohlerJ.McMahonJ. A.et al (1993). Sonic hedgehog, a member of a family of putative signaling molecules, is implicated in the regulation of CNS polarity. Cell.75 (7), 1417–1430. 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90627-3
48
FaliniB.MecucciC.TiacciE.AlcalayM.RosatiR.PasqualucciL.et al (2005). Cytoplasmic nucleophosmin in acute myelogenous leukemia with a normal karyotype. N. Engl. J. Med.352 (3), 254–266. 10.1056/NEJMoa041974
49
FanL.PepicelliC. V.DibbleC. C.CatbaganW.ZaryckiJ. L.LaciakR.et al (2004). Hedgehog signaling promotes prostate xenograft tumor growth. Endocrinology145 (8), 3961–3970. 10.1210/en.2004-0079
50
FarringtonS. M.BelaoussoffM.BaronM. H. (1997). Winged-Helix, Hedgehog and Bmp genes are differentially expressed in distinct cell layers of the murine yolk sac. Mech. Dev.62 (2), 197–211. 10.1016/s0925-4773(97)00664-3
51
FerraraF.SchifferC. A. (2013). Acute myeloid leukaemia in adults. Lancet381 (9865), 484–495. 10.1016/s0140-6736(12)61727-9
52
FreislebenF.BehrmannL.ThadenV.MuschhammerJ.BokemeyerC.FiedlerW.et al (2020). Downregulation of GLI3 expression mediates chemotherapy resistance in acute myeloid leukemia. Int. J. Mol. Sci.21 (14), E5084. 10.3390/ijms21145084
53
FukushimaN.MinamiY.KakiuchiS.KuwatsukaY.HayakawaF.JamiesonC.et al (2016). Small-molecule Hedgehog inhibitor attenuates the leukemia-initiation potential of acute myeloid leukemia cells. Cancer Sci.107 (10), 1422–1429. 10.1111/cas.13019
54
FurmanskiA. L.SaldanaJ. I.OnoM.SahniH.PaschalidisN.D'AcquistoF.et al (2013). Tissue-derived hedgehog proteins modulate Th differentiation and disease. J. Immunol.190 (6), 2641–2649. 10.4049/jimmunol.1202541
55
GailaniM. R.Ståhle-BäckdahlM.LeffellD. J.GlynnM.ZaphiropoulosP. G.PressmanC.et al (1996). The role of the human homologue of Drosophila patched in sporadic basal cell carcinomas. Nat. Genet.14 (1), 78–81. 10.1038/ng0996-78
56
GaoJ.GravesS.KochU.LiuS.JankovicV.BuonamiciS.et al (2009). Hedgehog signaling is dispensable for adult hematopoietic stem cell function. Cell. stem Cell.4 (6), 548–558. 10.1016/j.stem.2009.03.015
57
GeringM.PatientR. (2005). Hedgehog signaling is required for adult blood stem cell formation in zebrafish embryos. Dev. Cell.8 (3), 389–400. 10.1016/j.devcel.2005.01.010
58
GoetzS. C.AndersonK. V. (2010). The primary cilium: A signalling centre during vertebrate development. Nat. Rev. Genet.11 (5), 331–344. 10.1038/nrg2774
59
GruberW.HutzingerM.ElmerD. P.PariggerT.SternbergC.CegielkowskiL.et al (2016). DYRK1B as therapeutic target in Hedgehog/GLI-dependent cancer cells with Smoothened inhibitor resistance. Oncotarget7 (6), 7134–7148. 10.18632/oncotarget.6910
60
GruberW.PeerE.ElmerD. P.SternbergC.TesanovicS.Del BurgoP.et al (2018). Targeting class I histone deacetylases by the novel small molecule inhibitor 4SC-202 blocks oncogenic hedgehog-GLI signaling and overcomes smoothened inhibitor resistance. Int. J. Cancer142 (5), 968–975. 10.1002/ijc.31117
61
GulinoA.Di MarcotullioL.CanettieriG.SmaeleE. d.ScrepantiI. (2012). Hedgehog/Gli control by ubiquitination/acetylation interplay. Vitam. Horm.88, 211–227. 10.1016/b978-0-12-394622-5.00009-2
62
HanahanD.WeinbergR. A. (2011). Hallmarks of cancer: The next generation. Cell.144 (5), 646–674. 10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013
63
HannaA.ShevdeL. A. (2016). Hedgehog signaling: Modulation of cancer properies and tumor mircroenvironment. Mol. Cancer15, 24. 10.1186/s12943-016-0509-3
64
HayJ. F.LappinK.LiberanteF.KettyleL. M.MatchettK. B.ThompsonA.et al (2017). Integrated analysis of the molecular action of Vorinostat identifies epi-sensitised targets for combination therapy. Oncotarget8 (40), 67891–67903. 10.18632/oncotarget.18910
65
HeL.ArnoldC.ThomaJ.RohdeC.KholmatovM.GargS.et al (2022). CDK7/12/13 inhibition targets an oscillating leukemia stem cell network and synergizes with venetoclax in acute myeloid leukemia. EMBO Mol. Med.14 (4), e14990. 10.15252/emmm.202114990
66
HeathE. M.ChanS. M.MindenM. D.MurphyT.ShlushL. I.SchimmerA. D.et al (2017). Biological and clinical consequences of NPM1 mutations in AML. Leukemia31 (4), 798–807. 10.1038/leu.2017.30
67
HegdeG. V.PetersonK. J.EmanuelK.MittalA. K.JoshiA. D.DickinsonJ. D.et al (2008). Hedgehog-induced survival of B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells in a stromal cell microenvironment: A potential new therapeutic target. Mol. Cancer Res.6 (12), 1928. 10.1158/1541-7786.Mcr-08-0142
68
HeuserM.SmithB. D.FiedlerW.SekeresM. A.MontesinosP.LeberB.et al (2021). Clinical benefit of glasdegib plus low-dose cytarabine in patients with de novo and secondary acute myeloid leukemia: Long-term analysis of a phase II randomized trial. Ann. Hematol.100 (5), 1181–1194. 10.1007/s00277-021-04465-4
69
HeydtQ.LarrueC.SalandE.BertoliS.SarryJ.-E.BessonA.et al (2018). Oncogenic FLT3-ITD supports autophagy via ATF4 in acute myeloid leukemia. Oncogene37 (6), 787–797. 10.1038/onc.2017.376
70
HoT.-C.LaMereM.StevensB. M.AshtonJ. M.MyersJ. R.O'DwyerK. M.et al (2016). Evolution of acute myelogenous leukemia stem cell properties after treatment and progression. Blood128 (13), 1671–1678. 10.1182/blood-2016-02-695312
71
HofmannI.StoverE. H.CullenD. E.MaoJ.MorganK. J.LeeB. H.et al (2009). Hedgehog signaling is dispensable for adult murine hematopoietic stem cell function and hematopoiesis. Cell. stem Cell.4 (6), 559–567. 10.1016/j.stem.2009.03.016
72
HuiC.-C.AngersS. (2011). Gli proteins in development and disease. Annu. Rev. Cell. Dev. Biol.27, 513–537. 10.1146/annurev-cellbio-092910-154048
73
HumkeE. W.DornK. V.MilenkovicL.ScottM. P.RohatgiR. (2010). The output of Hedgehog signaling is controlled by the dynamic association between Suppressor of Fused and the Gli proteins. Genes. Dev.24 (7), 670–682. 10.1101/gad.1902910
74
HwangS. M. (2020). Classification of acute myeloid leukemia. Blood Res.55 (S1), S1-S4. 10.5045/br.2020.S001
75
ImA. P.SehgalA. R.CarrollM. P.SmithB. D.TefferiA.JohnsonD. E.et al (2014). DNMT3A and IDH mutations in acute myeloid leukemia and other myeloid malignancies: Associations with prognosis and potential treatment strategies. Leukemia28 (9), 1774–1783. 10.1038/leu.2014.124
76
IncardonaJ. P.LeeJ. H.RobertsonC. P.EngaK.KapurR. P.RoelinkH.et al (2000). Receptor-mediated endocytosis of soluble and membrane-tethered Sonic hedgehog by Patched-1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.97 (22), 12044–12049. 10.1073/pnas.220251997
77
InghamP. W.McMahonA. P. (2001). Hedgehog signaling in animal development: Paradigms and principles. Genes. Dev.15 (23), 3059–3087. 10.1101/gad.938601
78
IwasakiM.LiedtkeM.GentlesA. J.ClearyM. L. (2015). CD93 marks a non-quiescent human leukemia stem cell population and is required for development of MLL-rearranged acute myeloid leukemia. Cell. stem Cell.17 (4), 412–421. 10.1016/j.stem.2015.08.008
79
JamiesonC.MartinelliG.PapayannidisC.CortesJ. E. (2020). Hedgehog pathway inhibitors: A new therapeutic class for the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia. Blood Cancer Discov.1 (2), 134–145. 10.1158/2643-3230.Bcd-20-0007
80
KantarjianH.KadiaT.DiNardoC.DaverN.BorthakurG.JabbourE.et al (2021). Acute myeloid leukemia: Current progress and future directions. Blood Cancer J.11(2), 41-. 10.1038/s41408-021-00425-3
81
KasiriS.ShaoC.ChenB.WilsonA. N.YenerallP.TimmonsB. C.et al (2017). GLI1 blockade potentiates the antitumor activity of PI3K antagonists in lung squamous cell carcinoma. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-3315
82
KebenkoM.DrenckhanA.GrosS. J.JückerM.GrabinskiN.EwaldF.et al (2015). ErbB2 signaling activates the hedgehog pathway via PI3K-akt in human esophageal adenocarcinoma: Identification of novel targets for concerted therapy concepts. Cell. Signal.27 (2), 373–381. 10.1016/j.cellsig.2014.11.022
83
KobuneM.ItoY.KawanoY.SasakiK.UchidaH.NakamuraK.et al (2004). Indian hedgehog gene transfer augments hematopoietic support of human stromal cells including NOD/SCID-beta2m-/- repopulating cells. Blood104 (4), 1002–1009. 10.1182/blood-2003-09-3347
84
KobuneM.IyamaS.KikuchiS.HoriguchiH.SatoT.MuraseK.et al (2012). Stromal cells expressing hedgehog-interacting protein regulate the proliferation of myeloid neoplasms. Blood Cancer J.2, e87. 10.1038/bcj.2012.36
85
KobuneM.TakimotoR.MuraseK.IyamaS.SatoT.KikuchiS.et al (2009). Drug resistance is dramatically restored by hedgehog inhibitors in CD34+ leukemic cells. Cancer Sci.100 (5), 948–955. 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2009.01111.x
86
KouryJ.ZhongL.HaoJ. (2017). Targeting signaling pathways in cancer stem cells for cancer treatment. Stem Cells Int.2017, 2925869. 10.1155/2017/2925869
87
KrennP. W.MontanezE.CostellM.FässlerR. (2022). “Integrins, anchors and signal transducers of hematopoietic stem cells during development and in adulthood,” in Current topics in developmental biology (Academic Press).
88
LatuskeE. M.StammH.KlokowM.VohwinkelG.MuschhammerJ.BokemeyerC.et al (2017). Combined inhibition of GLI and FLT3 signaling leads to effective anti-leukemic effects in human acute myeloid leukemia. Oncotarget8 (17), 29187–29201. 10.18632/oncotarget.16304
89
LauC. I.YánezD. C.PapaioannouE.RossS.CromptonT. (2021). Sonic Hedgehog signalling in the regulation of barrier tissue homeostasis and inflammation. FEBS J.10.1111/febs.16222
90
LernerC.HarrisonD. E. (1990). 5-Fluorouracil spares hemopoietic stem cells responsible for long-term repopulation. Exp. Hematol.18 (2), 114–118.
91
LeyT. J.DingL.WalterM. J.McLellanM. D.LamprechtT.LarsonD. E.et al (2010). DNMT3A mutations in acute myeloid leukemia. N. Engl. J. Med.363 (25), 2424–2433. 10.1056/NEJMoa1005143
92
LeyT. J.MillerC.DingL.RaphaelB. J.MungallA. J.RobertsonA. G.et al (2013). Genomic and epigenomic landscapes of adult de novo acute myeloid leukemia. N. Engl. J. Med.368 (22), 2059–2074. 10.1056/NEJMoa1301689
93
LiJ.WangC.PanY.BaiZ.WangB. (2011). Increased proteolytic processing of full-length Gli2 transcription factor reduces the hedgehog pathway activity in vivo. Dev. Dyn.240 (4), 766–774. 10.1002/dvdy.22578
94
LiX.ChenF.ZhuQ.DingB.ZhongQ.HuangK.et al (2016). Gli-1/PI3K/AKT/NF-kB pathway mediates resistance to radiation and is a target for reversion of responses in refractory acute myeloid leukemia cells. Oncotarget7 (22), 33004–33015. 10.18632/oncotarget.8844
95
LimY.GondekL.LiL.WangQ.MaH.ChangE.et al (2015). Integration of Hedgehog and mutant FLT3 signaling in myeloid leukemia. Sci. Transl. Med.7 (291), 291ra96291ra296. 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaa5731
96
LimY.MatsuiW. (2010). Hedgehog signaling in hematopoiesis. Crit. Rev. Eukaryot. Gene Expr.20 (2), 129–139. 10.1615/critreveukargeneexpr.v20.i2.30
97
LiuZ.XuJ.HeJ.ZhengY.LiH.LuY.et al (2014). A critical role of autocrine sonic hedgehog signaling in human CD138+ myeloma cell survival and drug resistance. Blood124 (13), 2061–2071. 10.1182/blood-2014-03-557298
98
LongB.WangL.-X.ZhengF.-M.LaiS.-P.XuD.-R.HuY.et al (2016). Targeting GLI1 suppresses cell growth and enhances chemosensitivity in CD34+ enriched acute myeloid leukemia progenitor cells. Cell. Physiol. biochem.38 (4), 1288–1302. 10.1159/000443075
99
LöwenbergB.DowningJ. R.BurnettA. (1999). Acute myeloid leukemia. N. Engl. J. Med.341 (14), 1051–1062. 10.1056/nejm199909303411407
100
MaoJ.MayeP.KogermanP.TejedorF. J.ToftgardR.XieW.et al (2002). Regulation of Gli1 transcriptional activity in the nucleus by Dyrk1. J. Biol. Chem.277 (38), 35156–35161. 10.1074/jbc.M206743200
101
MarB. G.AmakyeD.AifantisI.BuonamiciS. (2011). The controversial role of the Hedgehog pathway in normal and malignant hematopoiesis. Leukemia25 (11), 1665–1673. 10.1038/leu.2011.143
102
MarcucciG.HaferlachT.DöhnerH. (2011). Molecular genetics of adult acute myeloid leukemia: Prognostic and therapeutic implications. J. Clin. Oncol.29 (5), 475–486. 10.1200/jco.2010.30.2554
103
MartinelliG.OehlerV. G.PapayannidisC.CourtneyR.ShaikM. N.ZhangX.et al (2015a). Treatment with PF-04449913, an oral smoothened antagonist, in patients with myeloid malignancies: A phase 1 safety and pharmacokinetics study. Lancet. Haematol.2 (8), e339–346. 10.1016/S2352-3026(15)00096-4
104
MartinelliG.OehlerV. G.PapayannidisC.CourtneyR.ShaikM. N.ZhangX.et al (2015b). Treatment with PF-04449913, an oral smoothened antagonist, in patients with myeloid malignancies: A phase 1 safety and pharmacokinetics study. Lancet. Haematol.2 (8), e339–e346. 10.1016/s2352-3026(15)00096-4
105
MazumdarT.DeVecchioJ.AgyemanA.ShiT.HoughtonJ. A. (2011). The GLI genes as the molecular switch in disrupting Hedgehog signaling in colon cancer. Oncotarget2 (8), 638–645. 10.18632/oncotarget.310
106
MerchantA.JosephG.WangQ.BrennanS.MatsuiW. (2010). Gli1 regulates the proliferation and differentiation of HSCs and myeloid progenitors. Blood115 (12), 2391–2396. 10.1182/blood-2009-09-241703
107
MinamiY.MinamiH.MiyamotoT.YoshimotoG.KobayashiY.MunakataW.et al (2017). Phase I study of glasdegib (PF-04449913), an oral smoothened inhibitor, in Japanese patients with select hematologic malignancies. Cancer Sci.108 (8), 1628–1633. 10.1111/cas.13285
108
MoR.FreerA. M.ZinykD. L.CrackowerM. A.MichaudJ.HengH. H.et al (1997). Specific and redundant functions of Gli2 and Gli3 zinc finger genes in skeletal patterning and development. Development124 (1), 113–123. 10.1242/dev.124.1.113
109
Nüsslein-VolhardC.WieschausE. (1980). Mutations affecting segment number and polarity in Drosophila. Nature287 (5785), 795–801. 10.1038/287795a0
110
OsawaM.HanadaK.HamadaH.NakauchiH. (1996). Long-term lymphohematopoietic reconstitution by a single CD34-low/negative hematopoietic stem cell. Science273 (5272), 242–245. 10.1126/science.273.5272.242
111
PabstC.BergeronA.LavalléeV. P.YehJ.GendronP.NorddahlG. L.et al (2016). GPR56 identifies primary human acute myeloid leukemia cells with high repopulating potential in vivo. Blood127 (16), 2018–2027. 10.1182/blood-2015-11-683649
112
PanY.BaiC. B.JoynerA. L.WangB. (2006). Sonic hedgehog signaling regulates Gli2 transcriptional activity by suppressing its processing and degradation. Mol. Cell. Biol.26 (9), 3365–3377. 10.1128/MCB.26.9.3365-3377.2006
113
ParkH. L.BaiC.PlattK. A.MatiseM. P.BeeghlyA.HuiC. C.et al (2000). Mouse Gli1 mutants are viable but have defects in SHH signaling in combination with a Gli2 mutation. Development127 (8), 1593–1605. 10.1242/dev.127.8.1593
114
PeerE.AichbergerS. K.ViloticF.GruberW.PariggerT.Grund-GroschkeS.et al (2021). Casein kinase 1D encodes a novel drug target in hedgehog-GLI-driven cancers and tumor-initiating cells resistant to SMO inhibition. Cancers (Basel)13 (16), 4227. 10.3390/cancers13164227
115
PeerE.TesanovicS.AbergerF. (2019). Next-generation hedgehog/GLI pathway inhibitors for cancer therapy. Cancers (Basel)11 (4), E538. 10.3390/cancers11040538
116
PeetersM.OttersbachK.BollerotK.OrelioC.de BruijnM.WijgerdeM.et al (2009). Ventral embryonic tissues and Hedgehog proteins induce early AGM hematopoietic stem cell development. Development136 (15), 2613–2621. 10.1242/dev.034728
117
PietrobonoS.GagliardiS.SteccaB. (2019). Non-canonical hedgehog signaling pathway in cancer: Activation of GLI transcription factors beyond smoothened. Front. Genet.10, 556. 10.3389/fgene.2019.00556
118
PollyeaD. A.JordanC. T. (2017). Therapeutic targeting of acute myeloid leukemia stem cells. Blood129 (12), 1627–1635. 10.1182/blood-2016-10-696039
119
PospisilikJ. A.SchramekD.SchnidarH.CroninS. J.NehmeN. T.ZhangX.et al (2010). Drosophila genome-wide obesity screen reveals hedgehog as a determinant of Brown versus white adipose cell fate. Cell.140 (1), 148–160. 10.1016/j.cell.2009.12.027
120
PurznerT.PurznerJ.BuckstaffT.CozzaG.GholaminS.RusertJ. M.et al (2018). Developmental phosphoproteomics identifies the kinase CK2 as a driver of Hedgehog signaling and a therapeutic target in medulloblastoma. Sci. Signal.11 (547), eaau5147. 10.1126/scisignal.aau5147
121
QuY.LennartssonA.GaidzikV. I.DenebergS.KarimiM.BengtzénS.et al (2014). Differential methylation in CN-AML preferentially targets non-CGI regions and is dictated by DNMT3A mutational status and associated with predominant hypomethylation of HOX genes. Epigenetics9 (8), 1108–1119. 10.4161/epi.29315
122
RedaelliA.LeeJ. M.StephensJ. M.PashosC. L. (2003). Epidemiology and clinical burden of acute myeloid leukemia. Expert Rev. Anticancer Ther.3 (5), 695–710. 10.1586/14737140.3.5.695
123
Riobo-Del GaldoN. A.Lara MonteroÁ.WertheimerE. V. (2019). Role of hedgehog signaling in breast cancer: Pathogenesis and therapeutics. Cells8 (4), E375. 10.3390/cells8040375
124
RosenbaumJ. L.WitmanG. B. (2002). Intraflagellar transport. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol.3 (11), 813–825. 10.1038/nrm952
125
Ruiz i AltabaA.MasC.SteccaB. (2007). The gli code: An information nexus regulating cell fate, stemness and cancer. Trends Cell. Biol.17 (9), 438–447. 10.1016/j.tcb.2007.06.007
126
SanchezP.HernándezA. M.SteccaB.KahlerA. J.DeGuemeA. M.BarrettA.et al (2004). Inhibition of prostate cancer proliferation by interference with SONIC HEDGEHOG-GLI1 signaling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.101 (34), 12561–12566. 10.1073/pnas.0404956101
127
SasakiH.NishizakiY.HuiC.NakafukuM.KondohH. (1999). Regulation of Gli2 and Gli3 activities by an amino-terminal repression domain: Implication of Gli2 and Gli3 as primary mediators of shh signaling. Development126 (17), 3915–3924. 10.1242/dev.126.17.3915
128
SavonaM. R.PollyeaD. A.StockW.OehlerV. G.SchroederM. A.LancetJ.et al (2018). Phase Ib study of glasdegib, a hedgehog pathway inhibitor, in combination with standard chemotherapy in patients with AML or high-risk MDS. Clin. Cancer Res.24 (10), 2294–2303. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-2824
129
SEER-database National Cancer Institute (2021). SEER cancer stat facts: Acute myeloid leukemia. [Online]. Available: https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/amyl.html (Accessed 4th of August, 2021).
130
SekeresM. A.SchusterM. W.JorisM.KrauterJ.MaertensJ. A.GyanE.et al (2019). A phase 1b study of glasdegib in combination with azacitidine in patients with untreated higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes, acute myeloid leukemia, and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia. Blood134 (1), 177. 10.1182/blood-2019-124050
131
ShallisR. M.BewersdorfJ. P.BodduP. C.ZeidanA. M. (2019). Hedgehog pathway inhibition as a therapeutic target in acute myeloid leukemia. Expert Rev. Anticancer Ther.19 (8), 717–729. 10.1080/14737140.2019.1652095
132
ShlushL. I.ZandiS.MitchellA.ChenW. C.BrandweinJ. M.GuptaV.et al (2014). Identification of pre-leukaemic haematopoietic stem cells in acute leukaemia. Nature506 (7488), 328–333. 10.1038/nature13038
133
SigginsS. L.NguyenN.-Y. N.McCormackM. P.VasudevanS.VillaniR.JaneS. M.et al (2009). The Hedgehog receptor Patched1 regulates myeloid and lymphoid progenitors by distinct cell-extrinsic mechanisms. Blood114 (5), 995–1004. 10.1182/blood-2009-03-208330
134
SinghM.ChaudhryP.MerchantA. A. (2016). Primary cilia are present on human blood and bone marrow cells and mediate Hedgehog signaling. Exp. Hematol.44 (12), 1181–1187. e1182. 10.1016/j.exphem.2016.08.009
135
SinghR.DhanyamrajuP. K.LauthM. (2017). DYRK1B blocks canonical and promotes non-canonical Hedgehog signaling through activation of the mTOR/AKT pathway. Oncotarget8 (1), 833–845. 10.18632/oncotarget.13662
136
SinghR.LauthM. (2017). Emerging roles of DYRK kinases in embryogenesis and hedgehog pathway control. J. Dev. Biol.5 (4), E13. 10.3390/jdb5040013
137
St-JacquesB.HammerschmidtM.McMahonA. P. (1999). Indian hedgehog signaling regulates proliferation and differentiation of chondrocytes and is essential for bone formation. Genes. Dev.13 (16), 2072–2086. 10.1101/gad.13.16.2072
138
SteccaB.MasC.ClementV.ZbindenM.CorreaR.PiguetV.et al (2007). Melanomas require HEDGEHOG-GLI signaling regulated by interactions between GLI1 and the RAS-MEK/AKT pathways. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.104 (14), 5895–5900. 10.1073/pnas.0700776104
139
TangY.GholaminS.SchubertS.WillardsonM. I.LeeA.BandopadhayayP.et al (2014). Epigenetic targeting of Hedgehog pathway transcriptional output through BET bromodomain inhibition. Nat. Med.20 (7), 732–740. 10.1038/nm.3613
140
TeglundS.ToftgårdR. (2010). Hedgehog beyond medulloblastoma and basal cell carcinoma. Biochim. Biophys. Acta1805 (2), 181–208. 10.1016/j.bbcan.2010.01.003
141
TeperinoR.AbergerF.EsterbauerH.RioboN.PospisilikJ. A. (2014). Canonical and non-canonical Hedgehog signalling and the control of metabolism. Semin. Cell. Dev. Biol.33, 81–92. 10.1016/j.semcdb.2014.05.007
142
TeperinoR.AmannS.BayerM.McGeeS. L.LoipetzbergerA.ConnorT.et al (2012). Hedgehog partial agonism drives Warburg-like metabolism in muscle and Brown fat. Cell.151 (2), 414–426. 10.1016/j.cell.2012.09.021
143
ThomasD.MajetiR. (2017). Biology and relevance of human acute myeloid leukemia stem cells.Blood129 (12), 1577–1585. 10.1182/blood-2016-10-696054
144
TianH.CallahanC. A.DuPreeK. J.DarbonneW. C.AhnC. P.ScalesS. J.et al (2009). Hedgehog signaling is restricted to the stromal compartment during pancreatic carcinogenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.106 (11), 4254–4259. 10.1073/pnas.0813203106
145
TibesR.Al-KaliA.OliverG. R.DelmanD. H.HansenN.BhagavatulaK.et al (2015). The Hedgehog pathway as targetable vulnerability with 5-azacytidine in myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukemia. J. Hematol. Oncol.8, 114. 10.1186/s13045-015-0211-8
146
TibesR.KosiorekH. E.DueckA. C.PalmerJ.SlackJ. L.KnightE.et al (2017). Phase I/IB study of azacitidine and hedgehog pathway inhibition with sonidegib (LDE225) in myeloid malignancies. Blood130, 2629. 10.1182/blood.V130.Suppl_1.2629.2629
147
TrowbridgeJ. J.ScottM. P.BhatiaM. (2006). Hedgehog modulates cell cycle regulators in stem cells to control hematopoietic regeneration. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.103 (38), 14134–14139. 10.1073/pnas.0604568103
148
TukachinskyH.LopezL. V.SalicA. (2010). A mechanism for vertebrate hedgehog signaling: Recruitment to cilia and dissociation of SuFu-gli protein complexes. J. Cell. Biol.191 (2), 415–428. 10.1083/jcb.201004108
149
UhmannA.DittmannK.NitzkiF.DresselR.KolevaM.FrommholdA.et al (2007). The Hedgehog receptor Patched controls lymphoid lineage commitment. Blood110 (6), 1814–1823. 10.1182/blood-2007-02-075648
150
VerhaakR. G. W.GoudswaardC. S.van PuttenW.BijlM. A.SandersM. A.HugensW.et al (2005). Mutations in nucleophosmin (NPM1) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML): Association with other gene abnormalities and previously established gene expression signatures and their favorable prognostic significance. Blood106 (12), 3747–3754. 10.1182/blood-2005-05-2168
151
VetrieD.HelgasonG. V.CoplandM. (2020). The leukaemia stem cell: Similarities, differences and clinical prospects in CML and AML. Nat. Rev. Cancer20 (3), 158–173. 10.1038/s41568-019-0230-9
152
WangY.DingQ.YenC. J.XiaW.IzzoJ. G.LangJ. Y.et al (2012). The crosstalk of mTOR/S6K1 and Hedgehog pathways. Cancer Cell.21 (3), 374–387. 10.1016/j.ccr.2011.12.028
153
WellbrockJ.BehrmannL.MuschhammerJ.ModemannF.KhouryK.BrauneckF.et al (2021). The BET bromodomain inhibitor ZEN-3365 targets the Hedgehog signaling pathway in acute myeloid leukemia. Ann. Hematol.100, 2933–2941. 10.1007/s00277-021-04602-z
154
WellbrockJ.LatuskeE.KöhlerJ.WagnerK.StammH.VettorazziE.et al (2015). Expression of hedgehog pathway mediator GLI represents a negative prognostic marker in human acute myeloid leukemia and its inhibition exerts antileukemic effects. Clin. Cancer Res.21 (10), 2388–2398. 10.1158/1078-0432.Ccr-14-1059
155
WhitsonR. J.LeeA.UrmanN. M.MirzaA.YaoC. Y.BrownA. S.et al (2018). Noncanonical hedgehog pathway activation through SRF-MKL1 promotes drug resistance in basal cell carcinomas. Nat. Med.24 (3), 271–281. 10.1038/nm.4476
156
WiernikP. H.BanksP. L.CaseD. C.ArlinZ. A.PerimanP. O.ToddM. B.et al (1992). Cytarabine plus idarubicin or daunorubicin as induction and consolidation therapy for previously untreated adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Blood79 (2), 313–319. 10.1182/blood.v79.2.313.bloodjournal792313
157
WilsonA.LaurentiE.OserG.van der WathR. C.Blanco-BoseW.JaworskiM.et al (2008). Hematopoietic stem cells reversibly switch from dormancy to self-renewal during homeostasis and repair. Cell.135 (6), 1118–1129. 10.1016/j.cell.2008.10.048
158
XuY.WangP.LiM.WuZ.LiX.ShenJ.et al (2021). Natural small molecule triptonide inhibits lethal acute myeloid leukemia with FLT3-ITD mutation by targeting Hedgehog/FLT3 signaling. Biomed. Pharmacother. = Biomedecine Pharmacother.133, 111054. 10.1016/j.biopha.2020.111054
159
YauchR. L.GouldS. E.ScalesS. J.TangT.TianH.AhnC. P.et al (2008). A paracrine requirement for hedgehog signalling in cancer. Nature455 (7211), 406–410. 10.1038/nature07275
160
YuanZ.GoetzJ. A.SinghS.OgdenS. K.PettyW. J.BlackC. C.et al (2007). Frequent requirement of hedgehog signaling in non-small cell lung carcinoma. Oncogene26 (7), 1046–1055. 10.1038/sj.onc.1209860
161
ZahreddineH. A.Culjkovic-KraljacicB.AssoulineS.GendronP.RomeoA. A.MorrisS. J.et al (2014). The sonic hedgehog factor GLI1 imparts drug resistance through inducible glucuronidation. Nature511 (7507), 90–93. 10.1038/nature13283
162
ZhangJ.FanJ.ZengX.NieM.LuanJ.WangY.et al (2021). Hedgehog signaling in gastrointestinal carcinogenesis and the gastrointestinal tumor microenvironment. Acta Pharm. Sin. B11 (3), 609–620. 10.1016/j.apsb.2020.10.022
163
ZhangX. M.Ramalho-SantosM.McMahonA. P. (2001). Smoothened mutants reveal redundant roles for shh and ihh signaling including regulation of L/R asymmetry by the mouse node. Cell.105 (6), 781–792. 10.1016/s0092-8674(01)00385-3
164
ZhaoC.ChenA.JamiesonC. H.FereshtehM.AbrahamssonA.BlumJ.et al (2009). Hedgehog signalling is essential for maintenance of cancer stem cells in myeloid leukaemia. Nature458 (7239), 776–779. 10.1038/nature07737
165
ZhouC.DuJ.ZhaoL.LiuW.ZhaoT.LiangH.et al (2021). GLI1 reduces drug sensitivity by regulating cell cycle through PI3K/AKT/GSK3/CDK pathway in acute myeloid leukemia. Cell. Death Dis.12 (3), 231. 10.1038/s41419-021-03504-2
166
ZhouH.-S.CarterB. Z.AndreeffM. (2016). Bone marrow niche-mediated survival of leukemia stem cells in acute myeloid leukemia: Yin and Yang. Cancer Biol. Med.13 (2), 248–259. 10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2016.0023
Summary
Keywords
acute myeloid leukemia, hedgehog (Hh) signaling, GLI proteins, cancer stem cell, leukemic stem cell, tumor microenvironment, combination therapy, smoothened inhibitor
Citation
Tesanovic S, Krenn PW and Aberger F (2022) Hedgehog/GLI signaling in hematopoietic development and acute myeloid leukemia—From bench to bedside. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 10:944760. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2022.944760
Received
15 May 2022
Accepted
11 July 2022
Published
05 August 2022
Volume
10 - 2022
Edited by
Matthias Lauth, Philipps University of Marburg, ZTI, Germany
Reviewed by
Qing Feng, Nanjing Medical University, China
Naveed Shaik, Pfizer, United States
Juana Serrano Lopez, Health Research Institute Foundation Jimenez Diaz (IIS-FJD), Spain
Updates
Copyright
© 2022 Tesanovic, Krenn and Aberger.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Peter W. Krenn, peter.krenn@plus.ac.at; Fritz Aberger, fritz.aberger@plus.ac.at
This article was submitted to Signaling, a section of the journal Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.