Skip to main content


Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol., 05 November 2020
Sec. Microbiome in Health and Disease
Volume 10 - 2020 |

Vaginal Microbiota and Cytokine Microenvironment in HPV Clearance/Persistence in Women Surgically Treated for Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia: An Observational Prospective Study

Elisabetta Caselli1* Maria D’Accolti1 Erica Santi2 Irene Soffritti1 Sara Conzadori2 Sante Mazzacane3 Pantaleo Greco2 Carlo Contini4 Gloria Bonaccorsi2
  • 1Section of Microbiology, Department of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sciences and LTTA Center, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
  • 2Section of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Department of Morphology, Surgery and Experimental Medicine, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
  • 3CIAS Research Center, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
  • 4Section of Infectious Diseases and Dermatology, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy

High-risk human papillomaviruses (hrHPVs) are causally related to cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and subsequent cervical cancer (CC). The vaginal microbiome has been suggested to play a role in the development of CC, but the effect of conservative surgical treatment on the microbiome and hrHPV elimination has not been elucidated. In this study, we aimed to characterize the vaginal microbiome and inflammatory chemokine profile in 85 women treated for CIN2-CIN3 lesions, before and after surgical CIN removal. The results showed, as expected, a high prevalence of dysbiotic microbiomes and vaginal pro-inflammatory cytokines in the CIN cohort, correlated with disease severity, at the basal level. By contrast, surgical CIN removal induced significant vaginal microbiome variations, and specific microbiome/cytokine profiles were associated with hrHPV clearance/persistence at 6-month follow-up. hrHPV-cleared patients, in fact, showed a specific increase of L. crispatus and decrease of dysbiosis and inflammatory cytokines compared to hrHPV-persistent patients. These data highlight the crosstalk between HPV and the local microbiome, and suggest that vaginal microbiome modulation might represent a novel approach to modifying the natural history of hrHPV-related CC.

Study registration n. ISRCTN34437150 (


Cervical cancer (CC) is one of the most common cancer in women, with an estimated 570,000 new cases in 2018 representing 7.5% of all female cancer deaths, and approximately 85% of the estimated 311,000 deaths per year occurring in low-income countries (Ferlay et al., 2018). In Italy, over 3,000 new cases were registered in 2018, with almost 1,000 deaths, despite the presence of screening and vaccination programs (Ferlay et al., 2019).

Human papillomavirus (HPV) infection is common in the female genital tract, and infection by high-risk oncogenic HPV (hrHPV) types has been causally related to invasive CC and its precursor premalignant stages (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, CIN) (Ferlay et al., 2018; Ferlay et al., 2019). The virus is spontaneously cleared in most infections, and the persistence of oncogenic hrHPV infection, occurring in about 10% of infected women, is associated with carcinogenesis (Ferlay et al., 2018; Ferlay et al., 2019). However, hrHPV infection is a necessary but not sufficient condition for CC development, as many factors including immunodeficiency, age, smoking, sexual promiscuity, and concomitant virus or bacterial infections have been associated with higher persistence rates and oncogenic risk (Wheeler, 2008; Vriend et al., 2015; Seraceni et al., 2016; Tamarelle et al., 2019). Recently, a possible role of the vaginal microbiome as a cofactor in CC development was suggested (Di Paola et al., 2017; Kyrgiou et al., 2017; Champer et al., 2018). Studies on the human microbiome have, in fact, shown that commensal microorganisms can be a major factor in both health and disease, and such a role has also been recognized in the female genital tract. Contrary to most sites in the human body, where different microbial communities are generally considered a health signature, in the vaginal environment, eubiosis healthy status is characterized by a low degree of diversity (Boskey et al., 2001; Ravel et al., 2011), and dominance of few species of Lactobacillus (Ravel et al., 2011; Kroon et al., 2018), which can prevent the colonization of exogenous pathogens by producing lactic acid, bacteriocins and reactive oxygen species (ROS). According to the dominant species, vaginal microbiomes have been classified into five different Community State Types (CSTs) (Ravel et al., 2011), with L. crispatus, L. gasseri, L. iners, and L. jensenii, respectively, dominating CST-I, CST-II, CST-III and CST-V. In all the Lactobacillus-dominated microbiomes, the pH is typically <4.5, which is well tolerated by Lactobacillus but inhibits several other types of bacteria. By contrast, CST-IV is characterized by depletion of Lactobacillus spp and a significantly higher pH and bacterial diversity, with prevalence of anaerobic species, including Gardnerella, Prevotella, Peptostreptococcus genera, and/or aerobic bacteria of Enterobacteriacee (Pybus and Onderdonk, 1999; Turovskiy et al., 2011; Reid, 2016; Di Paola et al., 2017), frequently associated with bacterial vaginosis (BV), which is the most common vaginal infection in women of reproductive age (De Seta et al., 2019). On the other hand, BV is associated with increased risk of acquiring sexually transmitted infections including HPV-associated ones (Gillet et al., 2011; King et al., 2011; Gillet et al., 2012; Guo et al., 2012; Gosmann et al., 2017). CST-IV is also frequently associated with aerobic vaginitis (AV), where Lactobacillus spp. are predominantly replaced by group B Streptococci (GBS), Escherichia coli, and Staphylococcus aureus (Jahic et al., 2013a; Jahic et al., 2013b; Vieira-Baptista et al., 2016).

A CST IV microbiome profile has emerged as a potential risk factor for CC onset and progression (Torcia, 2019). Some taxa have emerged as being particularly associated with increased oncogenic risk, including Ureaplasma parvum, Atopobium vaginae, Prevotella, Gardnerella, Sneathia sanguinegens, and Fusobacteria (Brotman et al., 2014; Drago et al., 2016). Few data are otherwise available on non-bacterial components of the vaginal microbiome (mycetes, protozoa), although some reports have observed their association with increased CC risk (Liang et al., 2019).

The hypothesis that chronic inflammation may promote carcinogenesis is supported by the increased inflammatory cytokine levels found in patients with CC or its precursor premalignant stages (CIN) (Mhatre et al., 2012). Toward this hypothesis, recent metabolomics studies provided evidence of a metabolite interaction between the host and the microbiome, correlating glycochenodeoxycholate/carnitine metabolism with non-Lactobacillus dominance and genital inflammation, and a positive correlation between adenosine/cytosine and Lactobacillus abundance (Ilhan et al., 2019).

In women with high-grade CIN, Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure (LEEP) is the treatment of choice, being associated with a significant decrease in the risk of persistence at 6 months. However, no information is available on the impact of surgical resection on vaginal microbiome and chemokine profile. The present study was thus aimed to investigate the vaginal microbiome (including non-bacterial microorganisms) and cytokine profile in a cohort of women undergoing LEEP treatment for CIN2 or CIN3 lesions.

Materials and Methods

Study Design and Study Population

An oriented observational, prospective, cohort study, approved by the local Ethics Committee (Comitato Etico Unico della Provincia di Ferrara, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria, Protocol N. 170394) (Study registration n. ISRCTN34437150,, was performed following The Code of Ethics of the World Medical Association (Declaration of Helsinki). Written informed consent was obtained from all enrolled women. Eighty-five women attending the Center of Preventive Gynaecology of the University-Hospital of Ferrara were enrolled. The eligibility criteria were age 30–50 years, CIN2/CIN3 diagnosis, candidate for LEEP, availability at 6-month follow-up, and signing informed consent. The exclusion criteria were pregnancy, innate or acquired immunodeficiency, concomitant neoplastic diseases or chronic inflammatory diseases/infections including aerobic vaginitis and other sexually transmitted diseases, corticosteroid, immune therapy, and unavailability at 6-month follow-up. HPV status was determined by Cobas 4800 HPV Test (Roche Diagnostics, Monza, Italy), allowing detection of hrHPV-16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 56, 58, 59, 66, 68. Patients were followed according to the Regional Protocol for CC prevention (Carozzi et al., 2015) and LEEP by monopolar energy diathermic loop was used for lesion removal. The protocol includes PAP-test, colposcopy and hrHPV-test before LEEP and follow-up control at 6 months after lesion removal. The CIN classification was performed by the unique central Pathological Anatomy laboratory of the University Hospital of Ferrara, based on the protocol defined for the CC prevention of Emilia Romagna region (Soloman, 1989; Darragh et al., 2013; GISCI, 2018).

Sample Collection

Cervico-vaginal samples were collected using sterile rayon swabs before LEEP treatment and during follow-up control, then put in 0.4 ml of sterile saline in a 1.5-ml sterile microtube, which was immediately refrigerated and processed within 3 h. Vaginal secretions were collected by washing the vaginal cavity with 5 ml of sterile saline. The collected samples were aliquoted in sterile 1.5-ml microtubes, immediately refrigerated, and then frozen at −80°C until use.

DNA Analysis

The total DNA was extracted from the cervico-vaginal swab samples using the Exgene Cell SV Kit (Gene All, Tema Ricerca, Bologna, Italy), following the manufacturer’s instructions, preceded by a pre-lysis step with 5 mg/ml of lysozyme to obtain optimal lysis of Gram-positive bacteria, as previously described (Comar et al., 2019). The extracted DNA was quantified by spectrophotometric reading at 260/280 nm, using a nanodrop (Thermo Scientific, Milan, Italy). The quality and amplificability of extracted DNA was checked by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification of the human beta-actin house-keeping gene (for eukaryotic DNA) and bacterial 16S rRNA gene (panbacterial PCR, panB, for prokaryotic DNA), as previously described (Caselli et al., 2018). The total DNA extracted from clinical samples was analyzed via a real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) microarray targeting 90 species usually present in the lower female genital tract, including bacteria, mycetes and protozoa (Microbial Vaginal Flora Array, catalog n. BAID-1902ZRA-24; Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). An amount of 1 µg of extracted DNA per plate (10 ng/well/reaction) was used for each microarray analysis (corresponding to 10 ng per reaction per well). Negative controls were included in each microarray assay, consisting of the microarray NTC (No Template Control) (Qiagen, Hilden Germany). The relative quantitation of each individual microbial parameter was calculated by Qiagen software ( and expressed as Log10 fold change compared to the Ct values detected in the NTCs.

Cytokine Analyses

Individual aliquots of vaginal washings were thawed on ice, and 50 µl of undiluted vaginal washings were first analyzed by a multiplex cytokine array (Multi-Analyte ELISArray, catalog n. MEH-004A; Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), following the manufacturer’s instructions. This ELISA array allowed us to simultaneously detect 12 different cytokines/chemokines: IL1α, IL1β, IL2, IL4, IL6, IL8, IL10, IL12, IL17α, IFNγ, and TNFα. Subsequently, based on the multiplex ELISA results, individual ELISA assays were performed for each cytokine/chemokine detected in the vaginal washing samples, namely, IL1α (BMS243-2, Hu IL-1A coated ELISA), IL1β (BMS224-2, Hu IL-1B coated ELISA), IL6 (KAC1261, Hu IL-6 ELISA kit), IL8 (KHC0081, Hu IL-8 ELISA kit), and TNFα (BMS2034, Hu TNFa coated ELISA) (all from Thermo Fisher Scientific, Monza, Italy). The assays were performed following the manufacturer’s instructions and using 50 µl of undiluted sample per well. All the samples were assayed in triplicate in the multiplex ELISA array and in duplicate in individual ELISA assays.

Statistical Analyses

GraphPad Prism (v. 5) was used for statistical data analysis. Student’s t test and Mann-Whitney test were used for comparison of two groups, and ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis tests for comparison between groups. Pearson’s chi-squared test was used for correlation analysis. A p value < 0.05 was considered significant.


Study Cohort

The demographic and clinical characteristics of the study population of the CIN cohort enrolled in the study are summarized in Table 1. Eighty-five patients were enrolled, with an average age corresponding to 38.02 years (median value 38; range 30–50); 78 of these patients were Caucasian, thus representing the vast majority of the study population (94.8%). Smokers accounted for one third of the total study cohort. Respectively, patients diagnosed as CIN2 and CIN3 represented 48.2% and 51.8% of the whole group of enrolled patients. As expected, the majority of enrolled patients (72/85, 84.7%) were positive for hrHPV, as determined by routine testing, while 13 patients were hrHPV-negative.


Table 1 Characteristics of the CIN2/CIN3 patients enrolled in the study.

Given that the study aim was to assess the association between the vaginal microbiome and hrHPV persistence in CIN patients, the hrHPV-negative women were excluded from the subsequent analyses. Sixty-six patients completed the follow-up (66/72, 91.7%). Among the hrHPV-positive patients who completed the follow-up, 16 showed margin involvement at the basal level and three of them showed recurrent lesions at follow-up.

Each enrolled patient was subjected to two samplings, one at the enrollment, just before the surgical excision of the cervical lesion, and one 6 months later, during the follow-up phase. From each patient one vaginal swab and one vaginal washing were collected, and these were analyzed for their microbiome profile and cytokine pattern, respectively.

Microbiome Characterization in the CIN Study Cohort

Microbiome Profile at the Basal Level

The microbiome profile was analyzed in the total DNA extracted from vaginal swabs by using a real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) microarray, identifying at the species level and simultaneously quantifying 90 microbial species usually present in the vaginal tract. Besides the bacteriome, this method also allowed the identification of mycetes and protozoa. The characterization of vaginal microbiomes by microarray allowed for recognition of the five vaginal CSTs within the study cohort (Figure 1). Overall, 18/72 (25.0%) of the vaginal microbiomes were identified as CST-I, 4/72 (5.5%) as CST-II, 22/72 (30.6%) as CST-III, 23/72 (32.0% %) as CST-IV, and 5/72 (6.9%) as CST-V. The CST distribution differed significantly in the CIN 2/CIN3 subgroups, with a statistically significant increase of CST-IV in CIN3 compared to CIN2 patients (17 vs. 44%, p < 0.001), and a concomitant decrease of CST-I (39 vs. 16%, p < 0.001).


Figure 1 Distribution of the Community State Types (CSTs) in the CIN study cohort. Total DNA extracted from vaginal swabs was analyzed by a specific qPCR microarray simultaneously identifying and quantifying 90 microbial species of the vaginal tract. CSTs were defined according to the prevalence of Lactobacilli or other bacteria. The results are expressed as the percentage of each CST among all hrHPV-positive patients (total number = 72), CIN2 patients (n = 34), or CIN3 patients (n = 38).

Similarly, the species prevalence and amount differed significantly among the different CSTs (Figure 2). In particular, the CST-I cluster was characterised by, besides L. crispatus dominance, the simultaneous high prevalence of other Lactobacilli, and by detectable levels of F. magna, G. vaginalis, and U. parvum (5.84, 21.66, and 13.62 fold-change, respectively, compared to negative controls).


Figure 2 Microbiome profiles of the five CSTs in the CIN study cohort. The results were obtained by analyzing total DNA extracted from vaginal swabs by a specific qPCR microarray simultaneously identifying and quantifying 90 microbial species of the vaginal tract and are expressed as Log10 fold change compared to negative controls (NTC, no template controls). Mean values ± SD for each microbial parameter are shown.

The CST-II group was instead characterised by the almost total absence of Lactobacilli, except for L. gasseri (dominant), and fair amounts of A. vaginae and C. albicans (respectively, 5.54 and 15.54 fold compared to controls). CST-III microbiomes contained, besides dominant L. iners, other less abundant Lactobacilli, and U. parvum was particularly abundant (68.45 fold, compared to negative controls). F. magna, G. vaginalis, Peptoniphilus asaccharolyticus, Prevotella bivia, and some Streptococcus species (agalactiae, anginosus, mitis, thermophilus/salivarius) were also present. The CST-IV cluster was characterised by a mixed population harbouring low or no Lactobacilli and high amounts of BV-associated microorganisms, including Aerococcus christensenii (13.01-fold), Anaerococcus prevotii (25.38-fold), A. vaginae (3428.12-folds), Leptotrichia amnionii (152.11-fold), Mycoplasma hominis (12.83-fold), Parvimonas micra (64.93-fold), Peptoniphilus asaccharolyticus (65.58-fold), Porphyromonas asaccharolitica (19.28-fold), Prevotella bivia (36.99-fold) and buccalis (60.64-fold), Sneathia sanguinegens (266.03-fold), and U. parvum (52.28-fold). F. magna, F. nucleatum, Mobiluncus curtisii and mulieris, and Peptostreptococcus anaerobius were also detectable (about 5-folds each, compared to negative controls). The CST-V group (L. jensenii dominant) showed fairly abundant L. crispatus, iners, and vaginalis, and elevated presence of Prevotella nigrescens above all, with very scarce amounts of the microorganisms detected in the other CST profiles. No protozoa were detected in any sample.

Significant differences were observable in grouped CIN2 and CIN3 patients (Figures 3A, B), with the CIN2 subgroup having a microbiome still dominated by Lactobacillus spp., though with a high presence of anaerobic Gram-negative BV-associated bacteria (especially A. vaginae, G. vaginalis, and U. parvum) and less prevalent microbes, including C. albicans, F. magna, Peptoniphilus asaccharoliticus, Peptostreptococcus anaerobius, Prevotella bivia, and some Streptococci. By contrast, the CIN3 microbiomes showed a drop in Lactobacilli, except for L. iners, and high prevalence of A. vaginae, G. vaginalis, and U. parvum, accompanied by other species not frequently detectable in CIN2 patients, including Aerococcus christensenii, Anaerococcus prevotii, Leptotrichia amnionii, Mycoplasma hominis, Parvimonas micra, Peptoniphilus asaccharolyticus, Porphyromonas asaccharolitica, Prevotella bivia and buccalis, and Sneathia sanguinegens (this last species at 46-fold compared to controls).


Figure 3 Microbiome profiles of the CIN2 (A) and CIN3 (B) subgroups. The results were obtained by analyzing the total DNA extracted from vaginal swabs by a specific qPCR microarray simultaneously identifying and quantifying 90 microbial species of the vaginal tract, and they are expressed as Log10 fold change compared to negative controls (NTC, no template controls). Mean values ± SD for each microbial parameter are shown.

Overall, the most frequently detected species in CIN patients was L. iners (76.7% of samples), followed by G. vaginalis, F. magna, L. crispatus, P. asaccharolyticus, P. bivia, A. prevotii and U. parvum, present in > 50% of CIN samples (Figure 4). Compared to CIN2 patients, the CIN3 subgroup had significantly increased frequency of G. vaginalis (75% vs. 63%) and A. vaginae (52% vs. 29%), and decreased F. magna (59% vs. 73%). Furthermore, Lactobacillus spp. other than L. iners were much less frequent in CIN3 compared to the CIN2 group, with L. crispatus dropping from 70% in CIN2 to 47% in the CIN3 group, and L. jensenii from 48% in CIN2 to 27% in the CIN3 group. Also, F. nucleatum, P. micra, P. disiens/buccalis, L. amnionii, M. hominis, U. urealyticum, and C. trachomatis were increased in CIN3 compared to the CIN2 group, and, contrarily, S. epidermidis, L. vaginalis and salivarius, P. acnes, and Candida krusei were less frequent in CIN3 compared to the CIN2 samples.


Figure 4 Frequency of detection of microbial species in the CIN study cohort. The results, obtained by qPCR microarray analysis of the vaginal microbiome, are expressed as percentages of detection frequency for the indicated species in the whole CIN study group (72 patients) and in the CIN2 and CIN3 subgroups (34 and 38 patients, respectively).

To provide more detail, Table S1 reports the percentage values detected in the whole hrHPV-positive study cohort, as well as in the CIN2 and CIN3 subgroups.

Microbiome Profile at Follow-Up

Most patients completed the 6-month follow-up after surgical intervention (66/72, 91.6%). Virus persistence was found in 14 patients (21.2%), and 4 of them had clinical CIN2/CIN3 recurrence (4/14, 28% recurrence rate); instead, 78.8% of the patients were hrHPV-negative, with a 0% clinical recurrence rate among them. All the 4 recurrence cases were hrHPV-positive at 6-month follow-up, and 3 of them had previous margin involvement.

The follow-up cohort showed significant modification of the CST distribution compared to the basal profiles (Figure 5A), with a significant increase of CST-I (37 vs. 25%, p < 0.001) and concomitant decrease of CST-IV (15 vs. 33%, p < 0.0001). CST-II and CST-V were unvaried, whereas CST-III was increased, although not significantly. Species analysis evidenced an overall increase of Lactobacilli, mostly L. crispatus (930-fold increase compared to basal levels), although L. iners was still the most prevalent. Concomitantly, several species detected at the basal level decreased, including A. vaginae, U. parvum, and G. vaginalis (Figure 5B). Interestingly, the CST distribution at follow-up differed both in CIN2 versus CIN3 subgroups (Figure 6A) and in hrHPV-cleared versus hrHPV-persistent patients (Figure 6B). In particular, CST-IV decrease compared to basal levels was more evident in CIN3 (from 44 to 12%, p < 0.001) compared to CIN2 patients (from 17 to 13%, p < 0.05), and am unmodified proportion of the hrHPV-persistent group presented the CST-IV profile (p = ns, not significant). The CST-I increase was higher in CIN3 (from 16 to 29%, p < 0.001) than in the CIN2 group (from 39 to 45%, p < 0.01), while the reverse was observed for CST-III, which was more prevalent in CIN3 compared to CIN2 patients (47 vs. 29%, p < 0.001). Concerning the hrHPV-status at follow-up, the results showed that a significantly decreased proportion of hrHPV-cleared patients had the CST-IV profile (from 32 to 10%, p < 0.0001), while the hrHPV-persistent group presented an unmodified prevalence of the CST-IV profile (32 vs. 29%, p = ns), although an increase of the CST-I type was also detectable in this subgroup. No significant differences in the proportion of virus clearance were observed relative to the basal CST groups, although the low number of patients in some CSTs rendered comparison between the populations difficult.


Figure 5 Vaginal microbiome profile of the CIN study group at follow-up. The total DNA extracted from vaginal swabs was analyzed by a specific qPCR microarray simultaneously identifying and quantifying 90 microbial species of the vaginal tract. (A) CST distribution in follow-up patients (66 patients). The results are expressed as the percentage of each CST among all patients who completed the follow-up. (B) Microbiome profile of the whole follow-up group of patients (66 patients). The results were obtained by qPCR microarray, and are expressed as Log10 fold change compared to negative controls (NTC, no template controls). Mean values ± SD for each microbial parameter are shown.


Figure 6 CST distribution in follow-up patients, as detected by qPCR microarray analysis. (A) Patients subdivided for lesion degree (CIN2 or CIN3) before intervention. The results are expressed as the percentage of each CST among all CIN2 (n = 34) and CIN3 (n = 38) patients. (B) Patients subdivided for hrHPV-status at follow-up. The results are expressed as the percentage of each CST among all hrHPV-negative (n = 52) or hrHPV-positive (n = 14) patients at follow-up.

Notably, the variations observed in the microbiome composition of the whole follow-up cohort were entirely ascribable to the hrHPV-cleared group, showing a significant increase of L. crispatus (19.3 fold compared to the basal amount, p < 0.001) and a concomitant decrease of BV-associated species, including A. vaginae, G. vaginalis, and U. parvum (Figures 7A, B), whereas little or no modifications were observed in the microbiome profiles of the hrHPV-persistent patients.


Figure 7 Microbiome profiles detected in hrHPV-negative (A) and positive (B) subgroups at follow-up. The results, obtained by qPCR microarray analysis of the vaginal microbiomes, are expressed as Log10 fold change compared to the corresponding basal levels detected before intervention in each subgroup. Mean values ± SD for each microbial parameter are shown.

At 6-month follow-up after LEEP, four patients with persistent HPV infection showed CIN2 or CIN3 recurrence and required further surgical treatment. Those recurrent patients exhibited a CST-I profile at the basal level (L. crispatus dominant), yet were characterised by very high loads of G. vaginalis, U. parvum, and C. albicans, compared to the whole CST-I group, and no significant variations were detected at follow-up, except for a slight decrease of L. crispatus and increase of S. agalactiae (Figures 8A, B).


Figure 8 Microbiome profiles detected in the hrHPV-persistent patients with clinical CIN2/CIN3 recurrence at follow-up. The results were obtained by qPCR microarray analysis of vaginal microbiomes. (A) The basal microbiome results are expressed as Log10 fold change compared to negative controls (NTC, no template controls). (B) The follow-up microbiome results are expressed as Log10 fold change compared to the values detected at the basal level. Mean values ± SD for each microbial parameter are shown.

Vaginal Cytokine Profile in the CIN Study Cohort

Each patient was also evaluated for the presence of cytokines/chemokines potentially associated with inflammation. First, vaginal samples were screened to detect 12 different cytokines/chemokines, and the results showed the presence of IL1α, IL1β, IL6, IL8, and TNFα (Figure 9A). Subsequent analysis of each cytokine by individual assay revealed fair amounts of each detected cytokine, with no statistically significant differences in cytokine concentration (mean pg/ml value) between the CIN2 and CIN3 subgroups (Figure 9B). In particular, the IL1α concentration corresponded to a mean value of 29.7 pg/ml (range 6.8–181.9 pg/ml), the IL1β mean concentration was 162.3 pg/ml (range 13.4–649.9 pg/ml), the IL6 mean concentration was 178.9 pg/ml (range 1.9–3493 pg/ml), IL8 presented a mean concentration of 1,105 pg/ml (range 284.9–2315 pg/ml), and the TNFα mean concentration was 33.4 pg/ml (range 6.3–633.3 pg/ml). Indeed, the cytokine concentrations differed accordingly with CST, particularly IL1β and IL8 in grouped CST-II, III and IV versus CST-I and V (p < 0.01), and IL6 and TNFα in the CST-IV profile versus the others (p < 0.05) (Figure 9C).


Figure 9 Cytokine profiles in vaginal washings from the CIN study cohort. (A) The results, obtained via a multi-analyte cytokine ELISA array performed on undiluted vaginal washings, are expressed as mean OD values ± SD (triplicate samples). (B) The results, obtained via individual cytokine ELISA assay for the indicated cytokines, performed on undiluted vaginal washing samples, are subdivided according to the lesion degree prior to intervention (CIN2 or CIN3) and expressed as mean pg/ml ± SD values of duplicate samples. (C) The results, obtained as described for panel B, are subdivided regarding the CST profiles of patients prior to intervention and expressed as mean pg/ml ± SD values of duplicate samples.

Interestingly, at the 6-month follow-up after LEEP, the concentrations of all detected cytokines were significantly decreased compared to their basal levels (p < 0.0001–0.05) (Figure 10A). However, the cytokine drop was almost exclusively significant in the hrHPV-cleared group, whereas no statistical significance (or no difference at all) could be detected between the basal and the follow-up levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines in the group of patients still showing persistence of hrHPV infection, with the exception of the IL-6 values, which were weakly significantly different in the hrHPV-persistent group compared to the original basal levels (p = 0.049) (Figure 10B).


Figure 10 Comparison between basal and follow-up cytokine amounts in the vaginal washings of enrolled patients. All results were obtained by individual ELISA assays performed on undiluted vaginal washing samples and are expressed as mean pg/ml ± SD values of duplicate samples. (A) Comparison between the entire basal (72 patients) and follow-up (66 patients) groups. (B) Comparison between the basal group (72 patients) and the hrHPV-negative (52 patients) and hrHPV-positive (14 patients) subgroups at follow-up.


Persistent infection with hrHPV is necessary but not sufficient for the development of CC, and recent studies focused on the possible role of the vaginal microbiome as a cofactor, due to its impact on the vaginal environment (Ferlay et al., 2018; Ferlay et al., 2019). Due to changess in the presence and metabolism of the microbial population of the vaginal tract, the vaginal environment could, in fact, facilitate or disadvantage infection by HPV and its stay in infected cells. However, longitudinal prospective studies characterising microbiota variations following CIN surgical removal are still needed, as well as functional studies on the compounds associated with specific vaginal microbiota profiles. Thus, in our study, we aimed to clarify the relationship between the vaginal microbiome, cytokine microenvironment, and hrHPV clearance/persistence in women surgically treated for CIN lesions, to highlight possible associations and provide new ideas and bases for CIN treatment.

The microbiome characterisation before the intervention showed, as expected, a significantly higher prevalence of the CST-IV (32.0%) profile compared to that among the healthy Caucasian population (10.3%) (Ravel et al., 2011), confirming the high prevalence of dysbiotic microbiomes in CIN women. Of note, CST-IV was significantly more prevalent in CIN3 compared to CIN2 patients, and CST-I was instead decreased, supporting a correlation of CST-IV with disease severity (OR=2.66, 95% CI 1.02–6.95, p < 0.01). Besides, the species identification/quantification provided by the used microarray technique highlighted the strict association between the absence of some specific Lactobacillus species and BV-associated microorganisms, evidencing the establishment of specific balances among microbes in the CIN habitat. Of note, L. gasseri dominance was associated with the absence of other Lactobacilli and presence of C. albicans, which was almost exclusively present in the CST-II microbiome. L. iners dominance was instead associated with high amounts of U. parvum and other BV-related bacteria.

Of note, the CIN2 microbiomes appeared to be still dominated by Lactobacilli, although accompanied by BV-associated bacteria and C. albicans, whereas CIN3 microbiomes showed a drop in Lactobacilli (except for L. iners) and high prevalence of A. vaginae, G. vaginalis, U. parvum, and S. sanguinegens, together with other species not frequent in CIN2 patients. Overall, the most frequently detectable species (present in more than 50% of samples) were, in order of frequency, L. iners, G. vaginalis, F. magna, L. crispatus, P. asaccharolyticus, P. bivia, A. prevotii, and U. parvum. These data are in line with previous reports showing a high frequency of vaginosis-associated microbes in HPV-infected women, accompanied by a decrease in Lactobacilli dominance (Kwasniewski et al., 2018; De Seta et al., 2019; Wakabayashi et al., 2019). No evidence of detectable amounts of Chlamidia trachomatis was found in our cohort, although it has been reported to be associated with CC induction (Karim et al., 2018). Similarly, the protozoon Trichomonas vaginalis was not evidenced in any sample from our study group, contrary to previous reports (Ghosh et al., 2017). However, significant differences have been reported in the prevalence of this microorganism relative to geographical and racial factors (Yang et al., 2018), and recent data showed anticancer activity of Trichomonas against CC cells, thus posing doubts about its role as an hrHPV cofactor (Zhu et al., 2018).

Overall, consistent with the presence of BV-associated microbiomes, a high concentration of pro-inflammatory cytokines was detected in the vaginal environment of CIN patients, including IL1α, IL1β, IL6, IL8, and TNFα, with the highest values found in the CST-IV profile compared to the others, confirming that BV-like vaginal microbiomes are associated with increased local inflammation (Campisciano et al., 2018; De Seta et al., 2019; Torcia, 2019).

Notably, a totally different picture was observed after surgical treatment, when a clear increase of CST-I/CST-III types, drop of CST-IV, and net augmentation of L. crispatus over the other species were observed, supporting its protective role in hrHPV eradication and consequent positive clinical outcomes. Importantly, such variations were exclusively present in the hrHPV-cleared group of patients (p < 0.001), whereas no significant changes were detected in the hrHPV-persistent group. In particular, an unmodified percentage of the subgroup still harboring hrHPV infection at follow-up presented the CST-IV profile (32 vs. 29%) (p = ns), although an increase of the CST-I type was also detectable in this subgroup. A constant trait of hrHPV-persistence-associated microbiomes was, however, the presence of G. vaginalis, which might likely initiate the polymicrobial biofilm present in bacterial vaginosis, allowing other species to adhere, including A. vaginae, as recently reported (Castro et al., 2020). No correlation was observed concerning the percentage of hrHPV clearance and the basal CST profile, but the very low number of patients in some CSTs rendered the comparison very difficult.

Concerning the risk of lesion recurrence, our data show that all recurrent patients were hrHPV-positive and 3 of them presented involvement of margins on excisional treatment, suggesting that although margin involvement is a risk factor for lesion recurrence, the post-treatment hrHPV-persistence predicts treatment failure more accurately than margin status and thus that post-treatment hrHPV testing is a more sensitive predictor of treatment outcome than margin involvement (Arbyn et al., 2017).

Interestingly, our data highlight the importance of the amount of microorganisms over their mere presence. In fact, when L. crispatus, although in a CST-I context, was accompanied by abundant G. vaginalis, U. parvum, and C. albicans, it was not per se favouring hrHPV clearance, as observed in the four patients developing CIN2/CIN3 clinical recurrence at follow-up. Consistent with this, such patients did not present any evident change of the microbiome profile at follow-up, except for a slight decrease of L. crispatus and increase of L. gasseri/iners/jensenii and S. agalactiae. Interestingly, this subgroup showed instead an increase in species mostly associated with aerobic vaginitis (AV), rather than BV, including aerobic enteric species such as Streptococcus agalactiae and group B Streptococci (Kaambo et al., 2018). Such a condition is characterized by a decrease in Lactobacilli and severe inflammation, and, although the number of recurrent patients was very low in the present study, this observation might deserve future studies to assess the association of such species with hrHPV persistence and related manifestations. In this direction, the increase of L. gasseri, iners, and jensenii in this subgroup is also of note, as no well-identified role has yet been recognized for them (Forney et al., 2006; Borges et al., 2014). However, given the small number of recurrences in our study, it is not possible to establish with certainty that some profile predisposes one to infection persistence or to lower success of surgical treatment, increasing the risk of recurrence. These data would need to be further investigated and confirmed in larger studies.

On the other hand, recent metabolome studies showed that a dysbiotic vaginal microbiome has a metabolic fingerprint that can discriminate patients from healthy subjects, and that non-Lactobacillus dominant profiles possess specific metabolic features (Ilhan et al., 2019; Borgogna et al., 2020). Considering the importance of host-microbe interactions in determining CC, and the possible translational potential of such data, it would therefore be important to study the correlations between specific vaginal microorganisms and metabolic hallmarks.

In conclusion, in our patient cohort, surgical removal of hrHPV-associated CIN lesions per se induced microbiome remodulation, and, on the other hand, specific microbiomes were associated with increased rates of hrHPV clearance.

Further studies enlarging the study population are needed to confirm our data; however, collected results suggest that interventions addressing vaginal microbiome modulation, through specific probiotics administration or by using targeted antimicrobials (antibiotics, bacteriophages), might be considered as potential tools to increase the rate of positive outcomes following surgical treatment of CIN lesions, opening the way to future possible therapeutic interventions.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated for this study can be found in the BioStudies (, accession No. S-BSST512.

Ethics Statement

The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by Comitato Etico Unico della provincia di Ferrara, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy. The patients/participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.

Author Contributions

EC contributed the conception and design of the study, acquisition, analysis, and interpretation of data, and drafting the manuscript. MD’A and IS performed experiments and collected data. ES contributed to the design of the study and sample collection. SC contributed to patient recruitment and sample collection. CC contributed to the conception and study design. SM contributed to data analysis and revising the manuscript. PG contributed study design, data analysis, and revising of the manuscript. GB contributed the conception and design of the study, data analysis and interpretation, and revising of the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.


The project was supported in part by FAR 2018 (EC and GB) and Barion Vito Foundation.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.


We acknowledge the technical assistance of Iva Pivanti and Altea Gallerani. The results were presented in part at the Miami Winter Symposium 2020 (January 26–29, 2020; Miami, USA).

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at:


Arbyn M., Redman C. W. E., Verdoodt F., Kyrgiou M., Tzafetas M., Ghaem-Maghami S., et al. (2017). Incomplete excision of cervical precancer as a predictor of treatment failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol. 18 (12), 1665–1679. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30700-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Borges S., Silva J., Teixeira P. (2014). The role of lactobacilli and probiotics in maintaining vaginal health. Arch. Gynecol Obstet 289 (3), 479–489. doi: 10.1007/s00404-013-3064-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Borgogna J. C., Shardell M. D., Santori E. K., Nelson T. M., Rath J. M., Glover E. D., et al. (2020). The vaginal metabolome and microbiota of cervical HPV-positive and HPV-negative women: a cross-sectional analysis. BJOG 127 (2), 182–192. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15981

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Boskey E. R., Cone R. A., Whaley K. J., Moench T. R. (2001). Origins of vaginal acidity: high D/L lactate ratio is consistent with bacteria being the primary source. Hum. Reprod. 16 (9), 1809–1813. doi: 10.1093/humrep/16.9.1809

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Brotman R. M., Shardell M. D., Gajer P., Fadrosh D., Chang K., Silver M. I., et al. (2014). Association between the vaginal microbiota, menopause status, and signs of vulvovaginal atrophy. Menopause 21 (5), 450–458. doi: 10.1097/GME.0b013e3182a4690b

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Campisciano G., Zanotta N., Licastro D., De Seta F., Comar M. (2018). In vivo microbiome and associated immune markers: New insights into the pathogenesis of vaginal dysbiosis. Sci. Rep. 8 (1), 2307. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-20649-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Carozzi F. M., Iossa A., Scalisi A., Sideri M., Andersson K. L., Confortini M., et al. (2015). hr-HPV testing in the management of women with ASC-US+ and in the follow-up of women with cytological abnormalities and negative colposcopy. Recommendations of the Italian group for cervical cancer screening (GISCi). Epidemiol. Prev. 39 (3 Suppl 1), 84–90. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2013.519

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Caselli E., Brusaferro S., Coccagna M., Arnoldo L., Berloco F., Antonioli P., et al. (2018). Reducing healthcare-associated infections incidence by a probiotic-based sanitation system: A multicentre, prospective, intervention study. PloS One 13 (7), e0199616. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199616

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Castro J., Rosca A. S., Cools P., Vaneechoutte M., Cerca N. (2020). Gardnerella vaginalis enhances Atopobium vaginae viability in an in vitro model. Front. Cell. Infect Microbiol. 10, 83. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2020.00083

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Champer M., Wong A. M., Champer J., Brito I. L., Messer P. W., Hou J. Y., et al. (2018). The role of the vaginal microbiome in gynaecological cancer. BJOG 125 (3), 309–315. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14631

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Comar M., D’Accolti M., Cason C., Soffritti I., Campisciano G., Lanzoni L., et al. (2019). Introduction of NGS in Environmental Surveillance for Healthcare-Associated Infection Control. Microorganisms 7 (12), 708. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms7120708

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Darragh T. M., Colgan T. J., Thomas Cox J., Heller D. S., Henry M. R., Luff R. D., et al. (2013). The Lower Anogenital Squamous Terminology Standardization project for HPV-associated lesions: background and consensus recommendations from the College of American Pathologists and the American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology. Int. J. Gynecol Pathol. 32 (1), 76–115. doi: 10.1097/PGP.0b013e31826916c7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

De Seta F., Campisciano G., Zanotta N., Ricci G., Comar M. (2019). The Vaginal Community State Types Microbiome-Immune Network as Key Factor for Bacterial Vaginosis and Aerobic Vaginitis. Front. Microbiol 10, 2451. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02451

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Di Paola M., Sani C., Clemente A. M., Iossa A., Perissi E., Castronovo G., et al. (2017). Characterization of cervico-vaginal microbiota in women developing persistent high-risk Human Papillomavirus infection. Sci. Rep. 7 (1), 10200. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-09842-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Drago F., Herzum A., Ciccarese G., Dezzana M., Casazza S., Pastorino A., et al. (2016). Ureaplasma parvum as a possible enhancer agent of HPV-induced cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: Preliminary results. J. Med. Virol 88 (12), 2023–2024. doi: 10.1002/jmv.24583

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ferlay J., Ervik M., Lam F., Colombet M., Mery L., Piñeros M., et al. (2018). Global Cancer Observatory: Cancer Today. [Online] (Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer). Available at: (Accessed 18 December 2019).

Google Scholar

Ferlay J., Ervik M., Lam F., Colombet M., Mery L., Piñeros M., et al. (2019). International Agency for Research on Cancer. Italy (source: Globocan 2018) [Online]. Available at: (Accessed 19 December 2019).

Google Scholar

Forney L. J., Foster J. A., Ledger W. (2006). The vaginal flora of healthy women is not always dominated by Lactobacillus species. J. Infect. Dis. 194 (10), 1468–1469; author reply 1469-1470. doi: 10.1086/508497

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ghosh I., Muwonge R., Mittal S., Banerjee D., Kundu P., Mandal R., et al. (2017). Association between high risk human papillomavirus infection and co-infection with Candida spp. and Trichomonas vaginalis in women with cervical premalignant and malignant lesions. J. Clin. Virol 87, 43–48. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2016.12.007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gillet E., Meys J. F., Verstraelen H., Bosire C., De Sutter P., Temmerman M., et al. (2011). Bacterial vaginosis is associated with uterine cervical human papillomavirus infection: a meta-analysis. BMC Infect. Dis. 11:10. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-11-10

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gillet E., Meys J. F., Verstraelen H., Verhelst R., De Sutter P., Temmerman M., et al. (2012). Association between bacterial vaginosis and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: systematic review and meta-analysis. PloS One 7 (10), e45201. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0045201

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

GISCI (2018). Utilizzo del test HPV-HR nel triage delle ASC-US, delle LSIL in donne con più di 35 anni, nel follow-up delle donne con citologia ASC-US+ dopo un approfondimento di secondo livello negativo per CIN2+ e nel follow-up dopo trattamento delle lesioni CIN2-3: aggiornamento 2018. [Online]. Available at: (Accessed September 28, 2020 2020).

Google Scholar

Gosmann C., Anahtar M. N., Handley S. A., Farcasanu M., Abu-Ali G., Bowman B. A., et al. (2017). Lactobacillus-Deficient Cervicovaginal Bacterial Communities Are Associated with Increased HIV Acquisition in Young South African Women. Immunity 46 (1), 29–37. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2016.12.013

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Guo Y. L., You K., Qiao J., Zhao Y. M., Geng L. (2012). Bacterial vaginosis is conducive to the persistence of HPV infection. Int. J. STD AIDS 23 (8), 581–584. doi: 10.1258/ijsa.2012.011342

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ilhan Z. E., Laniewski P., Thomas N., Roe D. J., Chase D. M., Herbst-Kralovetz M. M. (2019). Deciphering the complex interplay between microbiota, HPV, inflammation and cancer through cervicovaginal metabolic profiling. EBioMedicine 44, 675–690. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2019.04.028

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jahic M., Mulavdic M., Hadzimehmedovic A., Jahic E. (2013a). Association between aerobic vaginitis, bacterial vaginosis and squamous intraepithelial lesion of low grade. Med. Arch. 67 (2), 94–96. doi: 10.5455/medarh.2013.67.94-96

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jahic M., Mulavdic M., Nurkic J., Jahic E., Nurkic M. (2013b). Clinical characteristics of aerobic vaginitis and its association to vaginal candidiasis, trichomonas vaginitis and bacterial vaginosis. Med. Arch. 67 (6), 428–430. doi: 10.5455/medarh.2013.67.428-430

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kaambo E., Africa C., Chambuso R., Passmore J. S. (2018). Vaginal Microbiomes Associated With Aerobic Vaginitis and Bacterial Vaginosis. Front. Public Health 6, 78. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00078

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Karim S., Souho T., Benlemlih M., Bennani B. (2018). Cervical Cancer Induction Enhancement Potential of Chlamydia Trachomatis: A Systematic Review. Curr. Microbiol 75 (12), 1667–1674. doi: 10.1007/s00284-018-1439-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

King C. C., Jamieson D. J., Wiener J., Cu-Uvin S., Klein R. S., Rompalo A. M., et al. (2011). Bacterial vaginosis and the natural history of human papillomavirus. Infect. Dis. Obstet Gynecol 2011, 319460. doi: 10.1155/2011/319460

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kroon S. J., Ravel J., Huston W. M. (2018). Cervicovaginal microbiota, women’s health, and reproductive outcomes. Fertil Steril 110 (3), 327–336. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.06.036

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kwasniewski W., Wolun-Cholewa M., Kotarski J., Warchol W., Kuzma D., Kwasniewska A., et al. (2018). Microbiota dysbiosis is associated with HPV-induced cervical carcinogenesis. Oncol. Lett. 16 (6), 7035–7047. doi: 10.3892/ol.2018.9509

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kyrgiou M., Mitra A., Moscicki A. B. (2017). Does the vaginal microbiota play a role in the development of cervical cancer? Transl. Res. 179, 168–182. doi: 10.1016/j.trsl.2016.07.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liang Y., Chen M., Qin L., Wan B., Wang H. (2019). A meta-analysis of the relationship between vaginal microecology, human papillomavirus infection and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Infect. Agent Cancer 14, 29. doi: 10.1186/s13027-019-0243-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mhatre M., McAndrew T., Carpenter C., Burk R. D., Einstein M. H., Herold B. C. (2012). Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia is associated with genital tract mucosal inflammation. Sex Transm Dis. 39 (8), 591–597. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e318255aeef

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pybus V., Onderdonk A. B. (1999). Microbial interactions in the vaginal ecosystem, with emphasis on the pathogenesis of bacterial vaginosis. Microbes Infect. 1 (4), 285–292. doi: 10.1016/s1286-4579(99)80024-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ravel J., Gajer P., Abdo Z., Schneider G. M., Koenig S. S., McCulle S. L., et al. (2011). Vaginal microbiome of reproductive-age women. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 108 Suppl 1, 4680–4687. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1002611107

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Reid G. (2016). Cervicovaginal Microbiomes-Threats and Possibilities. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 27 (7), 446–454. doi: 10.1016/j.tem.2016.04.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Seraceni S., Campisciano G., Contini C., Comar M. (2016). HPV genotypes distribution in Chlamydia trachomatis co-infection in a large cohort of women from north-east Italy. J. Med. Microbiol 65 (5), 406–413. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.000245

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Soloman D. (1989). The 1988 Bethesda system for reporting cervical/vaginal cytologic diagnoses: Developed and approved at the national cancer institute workshop in Bethesda, MD, December 12–13, 1988. Diagn. Cytopathol 5 (3), 331–334. doi: 10.1002/dc.2840050318

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tamarelle J., Thiebaut A. C. M., de Barbeyrac B., Bebear C., Ravel J., Delarocque-Astagneau E. (2019). The vaginal microbiota and its association with human papillomavirus, Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Mycoplasma genitalium infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin. Microbiol Infect. 25 (1), 35–47. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2018.04.019

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Torcia M. G. (2019). Interplay among Vaginal Microbiome, Immune Response and Sexually Transmitted Viral Infections. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 20 (2), 266. doi: 10.3390/ijms20020266

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Turovskiy Y., Sutyak Noll K., Chikindas M. L. (2011). The aetiology of bacterial vaginosis. J. Appl. Microbiol 110 (5), 1105–1128. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2011.04977.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Vieira-Baptista P., Lima-Silva J., Pinto C., Saldanha C., Beires J., Martinez-de-Oliveira J., et al. (2016). Bacterial vaginosis, aerobic vaginitis, vaginal inflammation and major Pap smear abnormalities. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol Infect. Dis. 35 (4), 657–664. doi: 10.1007/s10096-016-2584-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Vriend H. J., Bogaards J. A., van Bergen J. E., Brink A. A., van den Broek I. V., Hoebe C. J., et al. (2015). Incidence and persistence of carcinogenic genital human papillomavirus infections in young women with or without Chlamydia trachomatis co-infection. Cancer Med. 4 (10), 1589–1598. doi: 10.1002/cam4.496

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wakabayashi R., Nakahama Y., Nguyen V., Espinoza J. L. (2019). The Host-Microbe Interplay in Human Papillomavirus-Induced Carcinogenesis. Microorganisms 7 (7), 199. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms7070199

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wheeler C. M. (2008). Natural history of human papillomavirus infections, cytologic and histologic abnormalities, and cancer. Obstet Gynecol Clin. North Am. 35 (4), 519–536; vii. doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2008.09.006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yang S., Zhao W., Wang H., Wang Y., Li J., Wu X. (2018). Trichomonas vaginalis infection-associated risk of cervical cancer: A meta-analysis. Eur. J. Obstet Gynecol Reprod. Biol. 228, 166–173. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.06.031

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhu Z., Zhao L., Brittingham A., Bai Q., Wakefield M. R., Fang Y. (2018). Trichomonas Vaginalis Inhibits HeLa Cell Growth Through Modulation of Critical Molecules for Cell Proliferation and Apoptosis. Anticancer Res. 38 (9), 5079–5086. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.12827

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: human papillomavirus, cervical neoplasia, surgical intervention, vaginal microbiome, vaginal cytokine, HPV clearance, HPV persistence infection

Citation: Caselli E, D’Accolti M, Santi E, Soffritti I, Conzadori S, Mazzacane S, Greco P, Contini C and Bonaccorsi G (2020) Vaginal Microbiota and Cytokine Microenvironment in HPV Clearance/Persistence in Women Surgically Treated for Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia: An Observational Prospective Study. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 10:540900. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2020.540900

Received: 06 March 2020; Accepted: 15 October 2020;
Published: 05 November 2020.

Edited by:

Francesco De Seta, IRCCS Materno Infantile Burlo Garofolo (IRCCS), Italy

Reviewed by:

Barbara Gardella, University of Pavia, Italy
Lara Termini, ICESP, Brazil
Ana Paula Lepique, University of São Paulo, Brazil

Copyright © 2020 Caselli, D’Accolti, Santi, Soffritti, Conzadori, Mazzacane, Greco, Contini and Bonaccorsi. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Elisabetta Caselli,