Abstract
Accumulating evidence suggests that selected microbiota-derived metabolites play a significant role in both tumor prevention and supportive treatment of cancer. Short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), i.e., mainly acetate, proprionate, and butyrate, are one of them. Nowadays, it is known that butyrate is a key microbial metabolite. Therefore, in the current review, we focused on butyrate and sodium butyrate (NaB) in the context of colorectal cancer. Notably, butyrate is characterized by a wide range of beneficial properties/activities. Among others, it influences the function of the immune system, maintains intestinal barrier integrity, positively affects the efficiency of anti-cancer treatment, and may reduce the risk of mucositis induced by chemotherapy. Taking into consideration these facts, we analyzed NaB (which is a salt of butyric acid) and its impact on gut microbiota as well as anti-tumor activity by describing molecular mechanisms. Overall, NaB is available as, for instance, food with special medical purposes (depending on the country’s regulation), and its administration seems to be a promising option for colorectal cancer patients.
Introduction
Short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) are known as significant microbial metabolites (Mohseni et al., 2020; Fang et al., 2021; Zhang et al., 2022). The group of SCFAs mainly includes acetate (C2), proprionate (C3), and butyrate (C4) (Liu et al., 2018; Guan et al., 2021). They are produced in different amounts; i.e., in the colonic lumen, the proportion is as follows: 60% acetate, 25% proprionate, and 15% butyrate (Canani et al., 2011). An appropriate ratio is 3:1:1 for acetate, proprionate, and butyrate, respectively (Nogal et al., 2021). The highest concentration of SCFAs is observed in the proximal colon (7–140 mM) (Sun et al., 2017; Liu et al., 2018).
Butyrate (a key bacterial metabolite) is produced in the colon through bacterial fermentation using dietary fibers and starch as sources (Louis and Flint, 2017). Butyrate-producing microbes are bacteria belonging to the Firmicutes phylum. According to some data, the most important butyrate-producer is Faecalibacterium prausnitzii (Kaźmierczak-Siedlecka et al., 2022). Butyrate provides multiple effects in the human body. Among others, it has anti-inflammatory properties (inhibits the pro-inflammatory mediators TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, and IL-8 as well as upregulates the anti-inflammatory IL-10) and affects intestinal mucosal immunity (for instance, through regulation of immune cell migration) (Liu et al., 2018). Sodium butyrate (NaB), which is a salt of butyric acid, is characterized by a wide range of beneficial properties/activities. NaB has been investigated in case of several diseases, such as inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) (Chen et al., 2018; Facchin et al., 2020), non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) (Zhou et al., 2017; Zhang et al., 2021), and obesity (Fang et al., 2019; Beisner et al., 2021). During the last several years, an increasing interest in the effect of NaB usage in the context of colorectal cancer has been observed.
Currently, colorectal cancer is one of the most commonly diagnosed cancer. Notably, 1.8 million new cases were noted in 2018 and 1.93 million in 2020, globally (Picard et al., 2020; Li et al., 2022). Despite the fact that the treatment of this cancer is quite well established and it regards neoadjuvant therapy as well as surgery, there is a need to search for new therapeutic mini-invasive or non-invasive methods that, among others, support the preparation of patients for surgical treatment, reduce the side effects of anti-cancer therapy, and inhibit the progression of disease. Modification of gut microbiota and metabolome aspects seems to be extremely significant in the case of colorectal cancer. Using of NaB may be a promising strategy for colorectal cancer patients.
The general properties/activities of butyrate
Immune system-related aspects
Butyrate is known as one of the most important metabolites produced through bacterial fermentation in the gut. The biosynthesis of butyrate is done in two metabolic pathways. The first of which regards the phosphorylation of butyryl-CoA to butyryl-phosphate and then the transformation to butyrate with enzyme butyrate kinase. The other metabolic pathway regards the transformation of butyryl-CoA to acetate and then to butyric acid (Liu et al., 2018). It has a wide range of beneficial properties including immunomodulatory functions and anti-tumor activity (Wu et al., 2018; Fu et al., 2019; Siddiqui and Cresci, 2021). It affects immune system by, among others, regulating the expression of pro- and anti-inflammatory mediators. Butyrate inhibits the expression of pro-inflammatory IL-1β and IL-6 while promoting the expression of anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 (Hui et al., 2019). Additionally, butyrate promotes the anti-tumor immunity of CD8+ T cells (He et al., 2021). The activity, proliferation, and apoptosis of multiple immune cells may also be directly regulated by butyrate (Danne and Sokol, 2021). Zhou et al. have shown that butyrate is produced by F. prausnitzii, and it maintains Th17/Treg balance (Zhou et al., 2018). Clostridium butyricum, which has probiotic properties, is also known as a butyrate-producing bacterium (Chen et al., 2020; Stoeva et al., 2021). In the Li et al. study, it was observed that butyrate constrained neutrophil functions as well as ameliorated mucosal inflammation in case of inflammatory bowel disease (Li et al., 2021). Butyrate provides anti-inflammatory effects and increases apoptosis in cancer cells (Jaye et al., 2022). Butyrate and proprionate are more effective in inhibiting HT29 cell growth compared to acetate (Jaye et al., 2022). Moreover, butyrate is a main source of energy for colonocytes (Fu et al., 2019). Additionally, it influences mucosal immunity and maintains gut microbiota stability, providing gut microbial homeostasis (Wu et al., 2018; Fu et al., 2019).
Maintenance of intestinal barrier integrity
Epithelial cells have G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), which are the receptor of butyrate (Hanus et al., 2021). It modulates cellular functions by the above-mentioned GPCRs, which are expressed in multiple cells and tissues (for instance, adipose tissue, monocytes, neutrophils, B and T lymphocytes, and colonic myeloid cells) (Siddiqui and Cresci, 2021). In adipose tissues, butyrate promotes production and secretion of leptin; thus, it may be mentioned as a body weight regulator (Coppola et al., 2021). Butyrate enhances epithelial cell proliferation and the mucus layer, and improves tight junctions (Peng et al., 2009). Notably, tight junctions are intercellular junctions essential for maintaining epithelial barrier integrity (Otani and Furuse, 2020). The claudin family of membrane proteins are a significant part of tight junctions (Otani and Furuse, 2020). The mucus layer is made up of butyrate, mucins, immunoglobulins, and glycoproteins (Zhang et al., 2019). It should be emphasized that butyrate upregulates the expression of the MUC2 gene; thus, it promotes the synthesis of mucins, which protect the epithelial cells from lumen toxins (Zhang et al., 2019). Bacteria such as Fusobacterium nucleatum, Bacteroides fragilis, and Escherichia coli are known colorectal cancer-associated pathogens, and they contribute to the dysfunction of intestinal barrier integrity (Kaźmierczak-Siedlecka et al., 2020; Ahmad Kendong et al., 2021). Butyrate increases the expression of claudin-1 and Zonula Occludens-1; thus, it is important in the context of maintenance of intestinal barrier integrity (Hajjar et al., 2021). In the Feng et al. study (regarding Caco-2 monolayers), it has been revealed that acetate (0.5 mM), proprionate (0.01 mM), and butyrate (0.01mM) both alone or in combination significantly increase transepithelial electrical resistance (Feng et al., 2018). They protect intestinal barrier function by inhibition of NLRP3 (cytosolic protein) inflammasome (Feng et al., 2018; Sharma and Kanneganti, 2021). Nevertheless, according to Huang et al., butyrate is the main SCFA that alleviates intestinal barrier dysfunction by downregulating the level of claudin-2 (Huang et al., 2021). Moreover, the authors concluded that claudin-2 is the major target of butyrate (Huang et al., 2021). The improvement of the intestinal barrier after butyrate supplementation was also confirmed in the Zhao et al. study regarding 48 rats with severe acute pancreatitis and intra-abdominal hypertension (Zhao et al., 2020). In this study, C. butyricum (butyrate-producing probiotic bacteria) and butyrate were given orally. It was noted that rats that consumed C. butyricum or butyrate had reduced intestinal injury and decreased the plasma level of inflammatory cytokines, diamine oxidase, and lipopolysaccharide (Zhao et al., 2020).
To summarize this part, butyrate is a key microbial metabolite that extremely affects the intestinal barrier function, and it seems to be needed for colorectal cancer patients in which increased intestinal permeability is noted.
Butyrate and apoptosis of cancer cells
Butyrate can induce the apoptosis of colorectal cancer cells (Bordonaro, 2020). In the Xiao et al. study, the apoptosis of colon cancer cells (HCT116) was detected using flow cytometry (Xiao et al., 2014). These cells were exposed to NaB at a dose of 10 mmol/L per 24 h. Previously, colon cancer cells were also treated with ERK inhibitor or siRNA. It was noted that NaB modulates ERK and sphingosine kinase 2 and consequently induces apoptosis of colon cancer cells (Xiao et al., 2014). The anti-carcinogenic effect of butyrate on colon cancer cells (SW480) was also confirmed in the Elimrani et al. study (Elimrani et al., 2015). Similarly, Roy et al. have shown that butyrate at a dose of 2.5–20 mM (and also carnitine) induces apoptosis of colon cancer cells and inhibits Caco-2 cell proliferation (Roy et al., 2009). Taking together the results of the above-mentioned studies, it can be concluded that butyrate may provide anti-carcinogenic effects.
Impact on anti-cancer treatment
Recently, it was shown that butyrate may improve the efficiency of radiotherapy (Park et al., 2020). Moreover, butyrate may enhance the irinotecan effect; thus, it may enhance the effect of chemotherapy (Encarnação et al., 2018). Similarly, the results of another study revealed that butyrate promotes the effects of 5-fluorouracil on cancerous colonocytes (Geng et al., 2021). It is estimated that approximately 40% of patients who underwent chemotherapy developed mucositis (Ferreira et al., 2012). Butyrate can reduce the side effects of treatment with 5-fluorouracil, which was shown in a mouse model study with mucositis induced by chemotherapy (Ferreira et al., 2012).
The reduction of butyrate-producing bacteria is observed in colorectal cancer patients (Wang et al., 2012). The intracellular concentration of butyrate in colonic cells is regulated by transporters, such as monocarboxylate transporter 1 (MCT1), sodium-coupled monocarboxylate transporter 1 (SMCT1), and breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP) (Gonçalves and Martel, 2016). Notably, the alterations of these transporters’ expression may occur in colorectal cancer patients (Gonçalves and Martel, 2016). During the discussion of transporters MCT1 and SMCT1, the term “butyrate paradox” was mentioned. The basis of this paradox is found deeply in epigenetics (Salvi and Cowles, 2021). In case of differentiated intestinal epithelial cells, butyrate is oxidized and utilized as a fuel (energy), and in this time, it is not able to inhibit histone deacetylase (HDAC), whereas cancerous colon cells use preferentially glucose as fuel instead of butyrate (Salvi and Cowles, 2021). Then, butyrate accumulates and acts as an inhibitor of HDAC. There is an observed prevalence of glycolytic metabolism over oxidative phosphorylation in these cells. The modification of histone (H3), which is induced by butyrate, is linked to the activation of genes participating in both cell cycle inhibition and apoptosis (Salvi and Cowles, 2021).
The summary of butyrate properties is presented in Figure 1.
Figure 1
Butyrate-associated beneficial effects in oncological aspects. Own elaboration based on literature (Gonçalves and Martel, 2016; Fu et al., 2019; Hui et al., 2019; Zhang et al., 2019; Hajjar et al., 2021; Huang et al., 2021; Siddiqui and Cresci, 2021).
Sodium butyrate
Anti-tumor activity of NaB
NaB is able to provide an anti-tumor effect in the context of colorectal cancer. Notably, there are several mechanisms by which NaB may be involved in this process (Wang et al., 2020). In the Xi et al. study, the effect of NaB on colorectal cancer cells (lines SW480, LOVO, HCT116, and HCT8) was investigated (Xi et al., 2021). The results of this study explore the anti-cancer activity of this component; i.e., NaB is able to induce apoptosis as well as inhibit colorectal cancer cell proliferation (Xi et al., 2021). In another study, the impact of NaB on colorectal cell lines (HCT116 and SW480) was also assessed (Zhou et al., 2019). The authors used next-generation RNA sequencing. It was noted that 7,192 genes were differently expressed in cells treated with NaB in comparison with untreated cells. Recently, it was also observed that NaB is able to inhibit colorectal cancer cells’ (lines HCT116 and LOVO) migration through enhancement of miR-200c expression-mediated downregulation of Bmi-1 (Xu et al., 2018). Notably, in another study it was noted that the miR-200c/FUT4 axis prevents the proliferation of colon cancer cells (Cong et al., 2021). This effect is obtained by downregulation of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway (Cong et al., 2021). Interestingly, Sanaei et al. investigated the effect of NaB on both AsPC-1 (pancreatic cancer) and HCT-116 (colon cancer) cell lines (Sanaei and Kavoosi, 2022). It was observed that NaB increased p16INK4a, p14ARF, and p15INK4b, and reduced class I and II HDACs (Sanaei and Kavoosi, 2022). The authors also reported that colon cancer cell lines were more sensitive to NaB than pancreatic cell lines (Sanaei and Kavoosi, 2022). Notably, p16INK4a is a tumor suppressor protein (Serrano, 1997). It was observed that the loss of p14ARF expression is related to more advanced tumors, which has been confirmed in the Kim et al. study (Kim et al., 2020) (Table 1).
Table 1
| Cells lines | NaB’s mechanism of action | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| CRC cells lines: SW480, LOVO, HCT116, HCT8 | ➢ induces apoptosis ➢ inhibits CRC cell proliferation | Xi et al., 2021 |
| CRC cells lines: HCT116, SW480 | ➢ 7,192 genes were differently expressed in cells treated with NaB in comparison with untreated cells | Zhou et al., 2019 |
| CRC cells lines: HCT116, LOVO | ➢ inhibits CRC cell migration via enhancement of miR-200c expression-mediated downregulation of Bmi-1 | Xu et al., 2018 |
| Pancreatic cell line: AsPC-1, colon cell line: HCT-116 | ➢ increases p16INK4a, p14ARF, and p15INK4b | Sanaei and Kavoosi, 2022 |
| CRC cell lines: HT29, SW480 | ➢ NaB significantly inhibits the growth of CRC cells and decreases the expression of thioredoxin-1 (Trx-1) protein in these cells | Wang et al., 2020 |
| CRC cell lines: HCT-116, HT-29 | ➢ induces autophagy in CRC cells by LKB1/AMPK signaling | Luo et al., 2019 |
Summary of the anti-tumor activity of NaB. CRC—colorectal cancer.
Thioredoxin and thioredoxin reductase are important modulators of tumor development (Zhang et al., 2017). Wang et al. have reported that NaB significantly inhibited the growth of colorectal cancer cells as well as decreased the expression of thioredoxin-1 (Trx-1) protein in these cells (Wang et al., 2020). Notably, these results were not observed in normal colon epithelial cells and that can explain the selective inhibition of cell growth by NaB (Wang et al., 2020). Trx-1 is defined as a small redox-active protein (Shao et al., 2020; Liu et al., 2022). The downregulation of Trx-1 seems to be important in the context of colorectal cancer (Wang et al., 2020). It can be associated with inflammation and oxidative stress (Shao et al., 2020). According to the results obtained in the Shao et al. study, Trx-1 can also be a potential therapeutic target in case of sepsis, due to the fact that it plays a significant role in inflammation and oxidative stress (Shao et al., 2020).
The deficiency of folic acid alters the cytosine methylation in DNA (Lu et al., 2008). Recently, Lu et al. investigated the role of folic acid and NaB in the prevention of colorectal cancer in a mouse model study (Lu et al., 2008). The results of this study have shown that the lower level of p21WAF1 gene expression was found in colorectal cancer samples compared to normal colorectal mucosa. The administration of NaB beneficially increased the level of p21WAF1 mRNA and p21WAF1 protein. Thus, it can prevent tumorigenesis in a mouse model of colorectal cancer induced by 1,2-dimethylhydrazine (Lu et al., 2008).
AMPK regulates glucose and cholesterol metabolism (Shackelford and Shaw, 2009). Liver kinase B1 (LKB1) is a tumor suppressor gene on human chromosome 19p13. LKB1 controls both cell metabolism and oxidative stress, and together with AMPK, it controls cell growth (Shackelford and Shaw, 2009; Ciccarese et al., 2019). NaB induces autophagy in colorectal cancer cells by LKB1/AMPK signaling, which has been demonstrated in the Luo et al. study (Luo et al., 2019). The authors concluded that NaB may be a novel target for colorectal cancer patients (Luo et al., 2019).
NaB and its impact on gut microbiota
The supplementation with NaB can beneficially affect gut microbiota. In the Ma et al. study, the effect of NaB on modulation of gut microbiota in mice with colorectal cancer liver metastasis was investigated (Ma et al., 2020). The composition of gut microbiota was assessed using 16S rRNA gene sequencing. It was observed that NaB beneficially altered gut microbiota. Moreover, it modulated immune system by decreasing Treg cells and increasing NK cells as well as T helper cells (Ma et al., 2020). In another animal model (C57BL/6J mice) study, it was revealed that exercise and NaB supplementation reversed metabolic dysfunctions, which have been induced by high-fat diet (p < 0.05), and inhibited the amount of microbes producing lipopolysaccharide (p = 0.001) (Yu et al., 2019).
The impact of diet on the concentration of SCFAs
The “Western” diet, which regards the consumption of high amounts of saturated fatty acids, simple sugars, and highly processed food, negatively alters the gut microbiome, causing its imbalance and promoting inflammatory environment (Bibbò et al., 2016; Christ et al., 2019). This type of diet is associated with an increased amount of opportunistic bacteria, lipopolysaccharide, and trimethyloamine-N-oxide as well as the decrease of SCFA production (Beam et al., 2021). As a consequence, it contributes to maintain chronic inflammation and development of nutrition-related diseases. Recently, it was shown that the dysbiotic microbial changes that are caused by a “Western” type of diet can be reversed by supplementation with butyrate (van den Berg et al., 2021). These results were obtained in an animal model study (C57BL/6 mice) (van den Berg et al., 2021).
The amount of bacteria that produce butyrate may be increased by the administration of omega-3 fatty acids [eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA)] (Gheorghe et al., 2022). In the Zhuang et al. study, it was noted that both EPA and DHA contribute to the increase of butyrate-producing bacteria while decreasing the bacteria that produce lipopolysaccharide, such as Bilophila and Escherichia/Shigella (Zhuang et al., 2020). Overall, omega-3 fatty acids have an impact on the composition of gut microbiota (Costantini et al., 2017). Moreover, they improve intestinal barrier integrity and reduce the amount of bacteria-producing trimethylamine (TMA) (Rousseau, 2021). The Mediterranean diet, which regards the consumption of food with a high content of dietary fiber, fish, olives, and olive oil (thus also omega-3 fatty acids), is associated with a high level of bacteria that produce SCFAs, and as a consequence, it contributes to the production of a high level of SCFAs and provides gut homeostasis (Merra et al., 2020; Calabrese et al., 2021; Gibiino et al., 2021; Nogal et al., 2021).
Directions for the future and recommendations for clinical practice in the context of microbiota
First of all, specialists should take into consideration the analysis of gut microbiota-related aspects in case of colorectal cancer patients. They should put more attention to fungi and viruses instead of only bacteria, because they are also a significant part of gut microbiota participating in carcinogenesis. According to some data, the components of gut microbiota can be used as novel biomarkers for the early detection of tumors, or they can be a promising marker for anti-cancer treatment including immunotherapy (Temraz et al., 2019; Tsiaoussis and Souglakos, 2021). Moreover, specialists should search for not only a local but also a distal association. For instance, there is a link between the imbalanced changes of oral microbiota and colorectal carcinogenesis and the progression of colorectal cancer. The gut microbial community and key phenotypes are also a significant field that should be further discussed. Notably, microbes can modulate host phenotypes (Han et al., 2021). Consequently, it affects many pathways and even changes the response to immunotherapy (Han et al., 2021). In this context, the production of metabolites by gut microbiota seems to be crucial. Therefore, not only the composition of gut microbiota but also microbiota-derived metabolites should be analyzed in colorectal cancer patients. The specialists should consider the supplementation of NaB in colorectal cancer but in combination with components that stimulate the production of butyrate, such as not only dietary fiber but also omega-3 fatty acids. Notably, these data are still deeply undiscovered. Some of the products/supplements (not only probiotics) can also change gut microbiota and even the microenvironment of the tumor. Interestingly, oral immunonutrition can alter the microenvironment of the tumor, which has been shown in the D’Ignazio et al. study (D’Ignazio et al., 2020).
Another challenge for the future of gut microbiota is shallow shotgun sequencing. Currently, in most of the studies, gut microbiome is analyzed with 16S rRNA gene sequencing, whereas the shallow shotgun method allows one to obtain a more functional point of view.
Conclusions
SCFAs are an integral part of gut microbiome functioning/homeostasis. Butyrate is a key C4 SCFA with a wide range of beneficial properties. NaB, which is a salt of butyric acid, may open a new promising option and can be a potential strategy for colorectal cancer patients. It provides anti-tumor effects via several molecular mechanisms, and they have been described in this paper. Nevertheless, studies that were published assess the effect of NaB on colorectal cancer cell lines or regard animal model studies. There is a large shortage of studies that investigate the results of supplementation with NaB in patients with colorectal cancer. It can be linked to the popularity of this type of products as well as the formal regulation of NaB, because it may differ depending on country. For instance, in Poland, NaB is available as food with special medical purposes. Overall, NaB should be considered as a supportive product in the complex interdisciplinary anti-cancer treatment.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Statements
Author contributions
All authors read and accepted the current form of the article. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1
Ahmad KendongS. M.Raja AliR. A.NawawiK. N. M.AhmadH. F.MokhtarN. M. (2021). Gut dysbiosis and intestinal barrier dysfunction: Potential explanation for early-onset colorectal cancer. Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol.11. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.744606
2
BeamA.ClingerE.HaoL. (2021). Effect of diet and dietary components on the composition of the gut microbiota. Nutrients13, 2795. doi: 10.3390/nu13082795
3
BeisnerJ.Filipe RosaL.Kaden-VolynetsV.StolzerI.GüntherC.BischoffS. C. (2021). Prebiotic inulin and sodium butyrate attenuate obesity-induced intestinal barrier dysfunction by induction of antimicrobial peptides. Front. Immunol.12. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.678360
4
BibbòS.IaniroG.GiorgioV.ScaldaferriF.MasucciL.GasbarriniA.et al. (2016). The role of diet on gut microbiota composition. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci.20, 4742–4749.
5
BordonaroM. (2020). Further analysis of p300 in mediating effects of butyrate in colorectal cancer cells. J. Cancer.11, 5861–5866. doi: 10.7150/jca.47160
6
CalabreseC. M.ValentiniA.CalabreseG. (2021). Gut microbiota and type 1 diabetes mellitus: The effect of Mediterranean diet. Front. Nutr.7. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2020.612773
7
CananiR. B.CostanzoM. D.LeoneL.PedataM.MeliR.CalignanoA. (2011). Potential beneficial effects of butyrate in intestinal and extraintestinal diseases. World J. Gastroenterol.17, 1519–1528. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i12.1519
8
ChenD.JinD.HuangS.WuJ.XuM.LiuT.et al. (2020). Clostridium butyricum, a butyrate-producing probiotic, inhibits intestinal tumor development through modulating wnt signaling and gut microbiota. Cancer Lett.469, 456–467. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2019.11.019
9
ChenG.RanX.LiB.LiY.HeD.HuangB.et al. (2018). Sodium butyrate inhibits inflammation and maintains epithelium barrier integrity in a TNBS-induced inflammatory bowel disease mice model. EBioMedicine30, 317–325. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2018.03.030
10
ChristA.LauterbachM.LatzE. (2019). Western Diet and the immune system: An inflammatory connection. Immunity51, 794–811. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2019.09.020
11
CiccareseF.ZulatoE.IndraccoloS. (2019). LKB1/AMPK pathway and drug response in cancer: A therapeutic perspective. Oxid. Med. Cell Longev.2019, 8730816. doi: 10.1155/2019/8730816
12
CongJ.GongJ.YangC.XiaZ.ZhangH. (2021). MiR-200c/FUT4 axis prevents the proliferation of colon cancer cells by downregulating the wnt/β-catenin pathway. BMC Cancer.21, 2. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-07670-y
13
CoppolaS.AvaglianoC.CalignanoA.Berni CananiR. (2021). The protective role of butyrate against obesity and obesity-related diseases. Molecules26, 682. doi: 10.3390/molecules26030682
14
CostantiniL.MolinariR.FarinonB.MerendinoN. (2017). Impact of omega-3 fatty acids on the gut microbiota. Int. J. Mol. Sci.18, 2645. doi: 10.3390/ijms18122645
15
DanneC.SokolH. (2021). Butyrate, a new microbiota-dependent player in CD8+ T cells immunity and cancer therapy? Cell Rep. Med.2, 100328. doi: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2021.100328
16
D’IgnazioA.KabataP.AmbrosioM. R.PolomK.MaranoL.SpagnoliL.et al. (2020). Preoperative oral immunonutrition in gastrointestinal surgical patients: How the tumour microenvironment can be modified. Clin. Nutr. ESPEN.38, 153–159. doi: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2020.05.012
17
ElimraniI.DionneS.SaragostiD.QureshiI.LevyE.DelvinE.et al. (2015). Acetylcarnitine potentiates the anticarcinogenic effects of butyrate on SW480 colon cancer cells. Int. J. Oncol.47, 755–763. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2015.3029
18
EncarnaçãoJ. C.PiresA. S.AmaralR. A.GonçalvesT. J.LaranjoM.Casalta-LopesJ. E.et al. (2018). Butyrate, a dietary fiber derivative that improves irinotecan effect in colon cancer cells. J. Nutr. Biochem.56, 183–192. doi: 10.1093/jn/nxy324
19
FacchinS.VituloN.CalgaroM.BudaA.RomualdiC.PohlD.et al. (2020). Microbiota changes induced by microencapsulated sodium butyrate in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Neurogastroenterol Motil32 (10), e13914. doi: 10.1111/nmo.13914
20
FangY.YanC.ZhaoQ.XuJ.LiuZ.GaoJ.et al. (2021). The roles of microbial products in the development of colorectal cancer: a review. Bioengineered12, 720–735. doi: 10.1159/000492853
21
FangW.XueH.ChenX.ChenK.LingW.. (2019). Supplementation with sodium butyrate modulates the composition of the gut microbiota and ameliorates high-fat diet-induced obesity in mice. J Nutr.149 (5), 747–54. doi: 10.1093/jn/nxy324
22
FengY.WangY.WangP.HuangY.WangF.. (2018). Short-chain fatty acids manifest stimulative and protective effects on intestinal barrier function through the inhibition of NLRP3 inflammasome and autophagy. Cell Physiol. Biochem.49 (1), 190–205. doi: 10.1159/000492853
23
FerreiraT. M.LeonelA. J.MeloM. A.SantosR. R. G.CaraD. C.CardosoV. N.et al. (2012). Oral supplementation of butyrate reduces mucositis and intestinal permeability associated with 5-fluorouracil administration. Lipids47, 669–678. doi: 10.1007/s11745-012-3680-3
24
FuX.LiuZ.ZhuC.MouH.KongQ. (2019). Nondigestible carbohydrates, butyrate, and butyrate-producing bacteria. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr.59, 130–152. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2018.1542587
25
GengH. W.YinF. Y.ZhangZ. F.GongX.YangY. (2021). Butyrate suppresses glucose metabolism of colorectal cancer cells via GPR109a-AKT signaling pathway and enhances chemotherapy. Front. Mol. Biosci.8. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2021.634874
26
GheorgheA. S.Negru ŞerbanM.PredaM.MihăilăR. I.KomporalyI. A.DumitrescuE. A.et al. (2022). Biochemical and metabolical pathways associated with microbiota-derived butyrate in colorectal cancer and omega-3 fatty acids implications: A narrative review. Nutrients14, 1152. doi: 10.3390/nu14061152
27
GibiinoG.De SienaM.SbranciaM.BindaC.SambriV.GasbarriniA.et al. (2021). Fabbri c. dietary habits and gut microbiota in healthy adults: Focusing on the right diet. a systematic review. Int. J. Mol. Sci.22, 6728. doi: 10.3390/ijms22136728
28
GonçalvesP.MartelF. (2016). Regulation of colonic epithelial butyrate transport: Focus on colorectal cancer. Porto Biomed. J.1, 83–91. doi: 10.1016/j.pbj.2016.04.004
29
GuanX.LiW.MengH. (2021). A double-edged sword: Role of butyrate in the oral cavity and the gut. Mol. Oral. Microbiol.36, 121–131. doi: 10.1111/omi.12322
30
HajjarR.RichardC. S.SantosM. M. (2021). The role of butyrate in surgical and oncological outcomes in colorectal cancer. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol.320, 601–608. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00316.2020
31
HanusM.Parada-VenegasD.LandskronG.WielandtA. M.HurtadoC.AlvarezK.et al. (2021). Immune system, microbiota, and microbial metabolites: The unresolved triad in colorectal cancer microenvironment. Front. Immunol.12. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.612826
32
HanS.Van TreurenW.FischerC. R.MerrillB. D.DeFeliceB. C.SanchezJ. M.et al. (2021). A metabolomics pipeline for the mechanistic interrogation of the gut microbiome. Nature595, 415–420. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03707-9
33
HeY.FuL.LiY.WangW.GongM.ZhangJ.et al. (2021). Gut microbial metabolites facilitate anticancer therapy efficacy by modulating cytotoxic CD8+ T cell immunity. Cell Metab.33, 988–1000. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2021.03.002
34
HuangX.OshimaT.TomitaT.FukuiH.MiwaH. (2021). Butyrate alleviates cytokine-induced barrier dysfunction by modifying claudin-2 levels. Biol. (Basel)10, 205. doi: 10.3390/biology10030205
35
HuiW.YuD.CaoZ.ZhaoX. (2019). Butyrate inhibit collagen-induced arthritis via Treg/IL-10/Th17 axis. Int. Immunopharmacol.68, 226–233. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2019.01.018
36
JayeK.LiC. G.ChangD.BhuyanD. J. (2022). The role of key gut microbial metabolites in the development and treatment of cancer. Gut Microbes14, 2038865. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2022.2038865
37
Kaźmierczak-Siedlecka,. K.DacaA.FicM.Van de WeteringT.FolwarskiM.MakarewiczW. (2020). Therapeutic methods of gut microbiota modification in colorectal cancer management - fecal microbiota transplantation, prebiotics, probiotics, and synbiotics. Gut Microbes11, 1518–1530. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2020.1764309
38
Kaźmierczak-Siedlecka,. K.Skonieczna-Żydecka,. K.HuppT.DuchnowskaR.Marek-TrzonkowskaN.PołomK. (2022). Next-generation probiotics - do they open new therapeutic strategies for cancer patients? Gut Microbes14, 2035659. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2022.2035659
39
KimK.HuhT.ParkY.KooD. H.KimH.HwangI.et al. (2020). Prognostic significance of USP10 and p14ARF expression in patients with colorectal cancer. Pathol. Res. Pract.216, 152988. doi: 10.1016/j.prp.2020.152988
40
LiG.LinJ.ZhangC.GaoH.LuH.GaoX.et al. (2021). Microbiota metabolite butyrate constrains neutrophil functions and ameliorates mucosal inflammation in inflammatory bowel disease. Gut Microbes13, 1968257. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2021.1968257
41
LiuH.WangJ.HeT.BeckerS.ZhangG.LiD.et al. (2018). Butyrate: A double-edged sword for health? Adv. Nutr.9, 21–29. doi: 10.1093/advances/nmx009
42
LiuY.XueN.ZhangB.LvH.LiS. (2022). Role of thioredoxin-1 and its inducers in human health and diseases. Eur. J. Pharmacol.919, 174756. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2022.174756
43
LiJ.ZhangA. H.WuF. F.WangX. J. (2022). Alterations in the gut microbiota and their metabolites in colorectal cancer: Recent progress and future prospects. Front. Oncol.12. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.841552
44
LouisP.FlintH. J. (2017). Formation of propionate and butyrate by the human colonic microbiota. Environ. Microbiol.19, 29–41. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.13589
45
LuoS.LiZ.MaoL.ChenS.SunS. (2019). Sodium butyrate induces autophagy in colorectal cancer cells through LKB1/AMPK signaling. J. Physiol. Biochem.75, 53–63. doi: 10.1007/s13105-018-0651-z
46
LuR.WangX.SunD. F.TianX. Q.ZhaoS. L.ChenY. X.FangJ. Y.et al. (2008) Folic acid sodium butyrate prevent tumorigenesis mouse model of colorectal cancerEpigenet. 3, 330–335. doi: 10.4161/epi.3.6.7125
47
MaX.ZhouZ.ZhangX.FanM.HongY.FengY.et al. (2020). Sodium butyrate modulates gut microbiota and immune response in colorectal cancer liver metastatic mice. Cell Biol. Toxicol.36, 509–515. doi: 10.1007/s10565-020-09518-4
48
MerraG.NoceA.MarroneG.CintoniM.TarsitanoM. G.CapacciA.et al. (2020). Influence of Mediterranean diet on human gut microbiota. Nutrients13, 7. doi: 10.3390/nu13010007
49
MohseniA. H.Taghinezhad-SS.FuX. (2020). Gut microbiota-derived metabolites and colorectal cancer: New insights and updates. Microb. Pathog.149, 104569. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2020.104569
50
NogalA.ValdesA. M.MenniC. (2021). The role of short-chain fatty acids in the interplay between gut microbiota and diet in cardio-metabolic health. Gut Microbes13, 1897212. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2021.1897212
51
OtaniT.FuruseM. (2020). Tight junction structure and function revisited. Trends Cell Biol.30, 805–817. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2020.08.004
52
ParkM.KwonJ.ShinH. J.MoonS. M.KimS. B.ShinU. S.et al. (2020). Butyrate enhances the efficacy of radiotherapy via FOXO3A in colorectal cancer patient-derived organoids. Int. J. Oncol.57, 1307–1318. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2020.5132
53
PengL.LiZ. R.GreenR. S.HolzmanI. R.LinJ. (2009). Butyrate enhances the intestinal barrier by facilitating tight junction assembly via activation of AMP-activated protein kinase in caco-2 cell monolayers. J. Nutr.139, 1619–1625. doi: 10.3945/jn.109.104638
54
PicardE.VerschoorC. P.MaG. W.PawelecG. (2020). Relationships between immune landscapes, genetic subtypes and responses to immunotherapy in colorectal cancer. Front. Immunol.11, 369. doi: 10.3390/md19020054
55
RousseauG.. (2021). Microbiota, a new playground for the omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids in cardiovascular diseases. Mar. Drugs19 (2), 54. doi: 10.3390/md19020054
56
RoyM. J.DionneS.MarxG.QureshiI.SarmaD.LevyE.et al. (2009). In vitro studies on the inhibition of colon cancer by butyrate and carnitine. Nutrition25, 1193–1201. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2009.04.008
57
SalviP. S.CowlesR. A. (2021). Butyrate and the intestinal epithelium: Modulation of proliferation and inflammation in homeostasis and disease. Cells10, 1775. doi: 10.3390/cells10071775
58
SanaeiM.KavoosiF. (2022). Effect of sodium butyrate on p16INK4a, p14ARF, p15INK4b, class I HDACs (HDACs 1, 2, 3) class II HDACs (HDACs 4, 5, 6), cell growth inhibition and apoptosis induction in pancreatic cancer AsPC-1 and colon cancer HCT-116 cell lines. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev.23, 795–802. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2022.23.3.795
59
SerranoM. (1997). The tumor suppressor protein p16INK4a. Exp. Cell Res.237, 7–13. doi: 10.1006/excr.1997.3824
60
ShackelfordD. B.ShawR. J. (2009). The LKB1-AMPK pathway: metabolism and growth control in tumour suppression. Nat. Rev. Cancer9, 563–575. doi: 10.1038/nrc2676
61
ShaoR.YangY.ZhangY.ZhaoS.ZhengZ.ChenG. (2020). The expression of thioredoxin-1 and inflammatory cytokines in patients with sepsis. Immunopharmacol. Immunotoxicol.42, 280–285. doi: 10.1080/08923973.2020.1755309
62
SharmaB. R.KannegantiT. D. (2021). NLRP3 inflammasome in cancer and metabolic diseases. Nat. Immunol.22, 550–559. doi: 10.1038/s41590-021-00886-5
63
SiddiquiM. T.CresciG. A. M. (2021). The immunomodulatory functions of butyrate. J. Inflamm. Res.14, 6025–6041. doi: 10.2147/JIR.S300989
64
StoevaM. K.Garcia-SoJ.JusticeN.MyersJ.TyagiS.NemchekM.et al. (2021). Butyrate-producing human gut symbiont, clostridium butyricum, and its role in health and disease. Gut Microbes13, 1907272. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2021.1907272
65
SunM.WuW.LiuZ.CongY. (2017). Microbiota metabolite short chain fatty acids, GCPR, and inflammatory bowel diseases. J. Gastroenterol.52, 1–8. doi: 10.1007/s00535-016-1242-9
66
TemrazS.NassarF.NasrR.CharafeddineM.MukherjiD.ShamseddineA. (2019). Gut microbiome: A promising biomarker for immunotherapy in colorectal cancer. Int. J. Mol. Sci.20, 4155. doi: 10.3390/ijms20174155
67
TsiaoussisJ.SouglakosJ. (2021). Microbiota: An emerging biomarker in colorectal cancer. Cancers (Basel)13, 5530. doi: 10.3390/cancers13215530
68
van den BergF. F.van DalenD.HyojuS. K.van SantvoortH. C.BesselinkM. G.WiersingaW. J.et al. (2021). Western-Type diet influences mortality from necrotising pancreatitis and demonstrates a central role for butyrate. Gut70, 915–927. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2019-320430
69
WangT.CaiG.QiuY.FeiN.ZhangM.PangX.et al. (2012). Structural segregation of gut microbiota between colorectal cancer patients and healthy volunteers. ISME J.6, 320–329. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2011.109
70
WangW.FangD.ZhangH.XueJ.WangchukD.DuJ.et al. (2020). Sodium butyrate selectively kills cancer cells and inhibits migration in colorectal cancer by targeting thioredoxin-1. Onco. Targets Ther.13, 4691–4704. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S235575
71
WuX.WuY.HeL.WuL.WangX.LiuZ. (2018). Effects of the intestinal microbial metabolite butyrate on the development of colorectal cancer. J. Cancer.9, 2510–2517. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-07845-1
72
XiY.JingZ.WeiW.ChunZ.QuanQ.QingZet al (2021). Inhibitory effect of sodium butyrate on colorectal cancer cells and construction of the related molecular network. BMC Cancer21 (1), 127. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-07845-1
73
XiaoM.LiuY. G.ZouM. C.ZouF. (2014). Sodium butyrate induces apoptosis of human colon cancer cells by modulating ERK and sphingosine kinase 2. Biomed. Environ. Sci.27, 197–203. doi: 10.3967/bes2014.040
74
XuZ.TaoJ.ChenP.ChenL.SharmaS.WangG.et al. (2018). Sodium butyrate inhibits colorectal cancer cell migration by downregulating bmi-1 through enhanced miR-200c expression. Mol. Nutr. Food Res.62, e1700844. doi: 10.1002/mnfr.201700844
75
YuC.LiuS.ChenL.ShenJ.NiuY.WangT.et al. (2019). Effect of exercise and butyrate supplementation on microbiota composition and lipid metabolism. J. Endocrinol.243, 125–135. doi: 10.1530/JOE-19-0122
76
ZhangJ.LiX.HanX.LiuR.FangJ. (2017). Targeting the thioredoxin system for cancer therapy. Trends Pharmacol. Sci.38, 794–808. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2017.06.001
77
ZhangN.QuY.QinB. (2021). Sodium butyrate ameliorates non-alcoholic fatty liver disease by upregulating miR-150 to suppress CXCR4 expression. Clin. Exp. Pharmacol. Physiol.48, 1125–1136. doi: 10.1111/1440-1681.13497
78
ZhangZ.ZhangH.ChenT.ShiL.WangD.TangD. (2022). Regulatory role of short-chain fatty acids in inflammatory bowel disease. Cell Commun. Signal.20, 64. doi: 10.1186/s12964-022-00869-5
79
ZhangY.ZhangB.DongL.ChangP. (2019). Potential of omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids in managing chemotherapy- or radiotherapy-related intestinal microbial dysbiosis. Adv. Nutr.10, 133–147. doi: 10.1093/advances/nmy076
80
ZhaoH. B.JiaL.YanQ. Q.DengQ.WeiB. (2020). Effect of clostridium butyricum and butyrate on intestinal barrier functions: Study of a rat model of severe acute pancreatitis with intra-abdominal hypertension. Front. Physiol.11. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.561061
81
ZhouQ.LiG.ZuoS.ZhuW.YuanX. (2019). RNA Sequencing analysis of molecular basis of sodium butyrate-induced growth inhibition on colorectal cancer cell lines. BioMed. Res. Int.2019, 1427871. doi: 10.1155/2019/1427871
82
ZhouD.PanQ.XinF. Z.ZhangR. N.HeC. X.ChenG. Y.et al. (2017). Sodium butyrate attenuates high-fat diet-induced steatohepatitis in mice by improving gut microbiota and gastrointestinal barrier. World J. Gastroenterol.23, 60–75. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i1.60
83
ZhouL.ZhangM.WangY.DorfmanR. G.LiuH.YuT.et al. (2018). Faecalibacterium prausnitzii produces butyrate to maintain Th17/Treg balance and to ameliorate colorectal colitis by inhibiting histone deacetylase 1. Inflamm. Bowel Dis.24, 1926–1940. doi: 10.1093/ibd/izy182
84
ZhuangP.ZhangY.ShouQ.LiH.ZhuY.HeL.et al. (2020). Eicosapentaenoic and docosahexaenoic acids differentially alter gut microbiome and reverse high-fat diet-induced insulin resistance. Mol. Nutr. Food Res.64, e1900946. doi: 10.1002/mnfr.201900946
Summary
Keywords
colorectal cancer, short-chain fatty acids, butyrate, sodium butyrate, gut microbiome, metabolome
Citation
Kaźmierczak-Siedlecka K, Marano L, Merola E, Roviello F and Połom K (2022) Sodium butyrate in both prevention and supportive treatment of colorectal cancer. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 12:1023806. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.1023806
Received
20 August 2022
Accepted
05 October 2022
Published
26 October 2022
Volume
12 - 2022
Edited by
Maximilian Weniger, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, United States
Reviewed by
Dong Tang, Northern Jiangsu People’s Hospital (NJPH), China; Shimeng Huang, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, China
Updates
Copyright
© 2022 Kaźmierczak-Siedlecka, Marano, Merola, Roviello and Połom.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Karolina Kaźmierczak-Siedlecka, leokadia@gumed.edu.pl
This article was submitted to Intestinal Microbiome, a section of the journal Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.