Abstract
There is a growing body of evidence highlighting the significant role of gut microbiota in various pathologies. We performed a systematic review to review the different microbiota involved in neuropsychiatric diseases. 50 studies (23 studies for autism spectrum disorders, 18 for major depression, and 9 for schizophrenia), representing 2,137 patients and 2,844 controls. Concerning the microbiota, the genera Prevotella, Clostridium, Bacteroides, Bifidobacterium, Ruminococcus, Megamonas, and Faecalbacterium were the ones detected with the most frequent variation of their relatives abundance. We also assess the overlap between the different pathologies. This study provides new insights into the complex relationship between the brain and the gut and the implications in neuropsychiatric pathologies. The identification of unique signatures in neuropsychiatric diseases suggests new possibilities in targeted anti or probiotic treatment.
Introduction
The past decade has seen increasing interest in the microbiota-gut-brain axis, the bidirectional communication between the brain and the gut (Stilling et al., 2014). The microbiota-gut-brain interaction may play a role in the pathogenesis of various central nervous disorders (Wang and Kasper, 2014) and is, probably, one of the most promising new areas of research (Heiss and Olofsson, 2019; Sasmita, 2019; Seguella et al., 2019) from an epidemiologic and clinical perspective. Recent developments in high throughput DNA sequencing have made it possible to study the microbiota cost-effectively. Changes in the diversity and composition of the gut microbiota have been reported for a wide range of brain disorders and different potential mechanisms of action have been reviewed. For long, the gut microbiota has been linked to the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis and mood disorders such as bipolar disorders and major depression disorders (MDD) (Cheung et al., 2019; Kelly et al., 2019; Peirce and Alviña, 2019). Also, Autism Spectrum Disease (ASD) is one the diseases that have been studied in depth (Saurman et al., 2020) and there is increasing interest in the gut-brain axis in schizophrenia research (Golofast and Vales, 2020). There is increasing interest in the role of the gut microbiota in major depression, the most common psychiatric disorder. Overactivity of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis in major depression, a link between HPA axis activity and cognitive performance, and a possible involvement of HPA axis genetic variation in cognition have all been discovered in neuroendocrine investigations (Keller et al., 2017). Changes in gut microbiota composition could increase gut barrier permeability, activate systemic inflammation and immune responses, regulate monoamine neurotransmitter release and efficacy, change the activity and function of the HPA axis, and change the abundance of brain-derived neurotrophic factor, all of which could lead to depression (Du et al., 2020).
Despite the growing body of evidence, there is a lack of quantitative evidence about the different microbiota involved in psychiatric diseases. However, many questions remain to be answered. Are gut microbiota are implicated consistently to a specific disorder across studies? Are the associations unique to the disease or are the associations also seen in other psychiatric diseases? To answer these questions we have reviewed the direction of the relationship between microbiota and disease across various neurologic and neuropsychiatric diseases.
Methods
Search Strategy
To identify the microbiota associated with neurological and neuropsychiatric disorders in the human population we performed a literature review that included articles published prior to 1st January 2021 with a combination of term “gut”, “microbiota”, “microbiome”, “stool”, “fecal” and the different pathologies “Depression”, “MDD”, “Autism”, “Autism spectrum disorders”, “Schizophrenia”. Additional relevant articles were sought through a manual bibliography search. Inclusion criteria were: human research, focus on depression, ASD, schizophrenia that makes a comparison between patients and healthy controls, focus on gut microbiota quantified from stool samples, articles published in English in peer-reviewed journals. A flow diagram of study selection is presented in Figure 1.
Figure 1
Data Extraction
From the included studies the following parameters were extracted: the country where the experiments have been carried out, general characteristics of the patients and control (e.g., age, BMI, sex ratio), microbiota analysis method. We then listed the different taxon of which relative abundance has been found statistically significantly different between patients and healthy controls and indicated the direction: relative abundance increased or decreased in the various pathologies.
Statistical Analysis
We determined whether findings were consistent across studies of a single disorder based on statistical significance and the direction of association for the studies that showed significant results. If two studies were found to show the same direction of the relationship (e.g., microbiota Taxus was found more often in patients in both studies), findings were classified as consistent. As most studies were small, one expects heterogeneity across studies due to random fluctuation. We therefore also considered findings for which the consistency between was more than 50% as consistent. We present the phylogenetic trees of the microbiota that have been successfully found in the literature for the different pathologies using the GraPhIAn package in Python (Asnicar et al., 2015). General information about the included studies and baseline data on patients were summarized in graphics. To compare the different microbiota involved in the studies’ pathologies we used Venn diagrams using the VennDiagram package in R (Chen and Boutros, 2011).
Results
In total, 50 studies were included in this review, representing 2,137 patients and 2,844 controls, the repartition of the patients within the different pathologies is presented in Supplementary Figure 1. ASD is the most frequently studied disorder (Figure 1 and Supplementary Figure 1), comprising 46% of all patients and 44% of all studies. As the gut microbiota is known to depend on the environment (Anwar et al., 2021) and diet (Zmora et al., 2019), which differ across societies and cultures and thus across studies, the distribution of the studies per country is presented in Figure 2. It is of note that most of the studies were conducted in China (n = 26, 52%) and in the USA (n = 11, 22%), only 8 (16%) of the included studies were done in Europe.
Figure 2
The characteristics for patients with ASD are presented in Supplementary Table 1, for depression in Supplementary Table 2, and for schizophrenia in Supplementary Table 3.
The most studied neuropsychiatric disorder is ASD with twenty-three studies included in the review, involving a total of 932 patients and 792 healthy controls (Adams et al., 2011; Wang et al., 2011; Gondalia et al., 2012; Kang et al., 2013; Son et al., 2015; Tomova et al., 2015; Luna et al., 2016; Strati et al., 2017; Iovene et al., 2017; Kushak et al., 2017; Kang et al., 2018; Pulikkan et al., 2018; Zhang et al., 2018; Rose et al., 2018; Liu et al., 2019; Zhai et al., 2019; Ma et al., 2019; Plaza-Díaz et al., 2019; Sun et al., 2019; Chen et al., 2020; Ding et al., 2020; Zou et al., 2020; Ahmed et al., 2020). At the genus level, there are 64 gut microbiota-disease associations reported. Of these, 12 (19%) associations are consistent (Bacillus, Collinsella, Dialister, Dorea, Escherichia/Shigella, Lachnospira, Lactobacillus, Megaspharea, Odoribacter, Oscillospira, Streptococcus, Veillonella) and for 4 there are multiple studies in the same direction (Escherichia/Shigella, Lachnospira, Lactobacillus, Streptococcus). For 14 (25%) gut microbiota, an opposite direction of association is reported (Actinomyces, Akkermansia, Bacteroides, Bifidobacterium, Bilophila, Clostridium, Erysipelatoclostridium, Faecalbacterium, Haemophilus, Lachnoclostridium, Megamonas, Parabacteroides, Prevotella, Ruminococcus). The phylogenetic tree representing the results are presented in Figure 3, the complete results of the individual studies are presented in Supplementary Table 4. Of note is that some studies did not find any statistical differences between ASD patients and controls (Gondalia et al., 2012; Son et al., 2015).
Figure 3
Eighteen studies on MDD were included in the review, involving a total of 801 depressed patients and 1,634 healthy controls (Naseribafrouei et al., 2014; Jiang et al., 2015; Aizawa et al., 2016; Zheng et al., 2016; Kelly et al., 2016; Liu et al., 2016; Lin et al., 2017; Chen et al., 2018; Chen et al., 2018; Valles-Colomer et al., 2019; Lai et al., 2019; Chung et al., 2019; Rong et al., 2019; Mason et al., 2020; Fontana et al., 2020; Zheng et al., 2020; Liu et al., 2020; Chen et al., 2020). At the genus levels, 21 associations were detected in only one study, 12 (27%) association were consistent in term of direction and significance (Anaerostipes, Coprococcus, Dialister, Eggerthella, Eubacterium, Faecalbacterium, Holdemania, Lachnospira, Parabacteroides, Parasutterella, Streptococcus, Sutterella). For the other associations, Bacteroides concentration was found increased in four studies and decreased in two studies, Blautia concentration was found increased in 4 studies while the relative abundance was found decreased in two studies, for Clostridium 5 studies found an increase of the relative abundance and only one study found a decreased concentration, for Oscillibacter 3 studies found an increase and only one a decrease of the relative abundance, for Bifidobacterium and Prevotella 3 studies found a decrease and 2 and increase of the relative abundance finally three associations (Alistipes, Megamonas, Ruminococcus) are found in the same direction in 2 studies and on the opposite direction in 1 study. The phylogenetic tree representing the results are presented in Figure 4. Complete results of the included studies are presented in Supplementary Table 5.
Figure 4
For schizophrenia, nine studies were included, involving a total of 404 patients and 418 healthy controls (Schwarz et al., 2018; Shen et al., 2018; Nguyen et al., 2019; Xu et al., 2019; Li et al., 2020; Ma et al., 2020; Pan et al., 2020; Xu et al., 2020; Zhang et al., 2020). 11 (16%) genera were found consistent in term of direction and significance (Actinomyces, Anaerococcus, Bilophila, Butyricicoccus, Christensenella, Collinsella, Coprococcus, Faecalbacterium, Flavonifractor, Holdemania, Prevotella) and 5 (7%) were inconsistent in term of direction (Blautia, Clostridium, Eisenbergiella, Megasphaera, Ruminococcus) (see Figure 5 and Supplementary Table 6).
Figure 5
The picture emerging is that for ASD association of 6 genera is replicated in 3 studies or more. For depression 12 associations were consistent but for 10 findings were in opposite direction. Finally, for schizophrenia, only 1 association was found consistent in 3 studies and 11 in two studies.
First, we started from the microbiota and determined whether the association was reported to different pathologies. Figure 6 shows the microbiota which are associated with multiple disorders and the number of studies that found the association of the genus to a disease. Prevotella and Clostridium are associated with multiple psychiatric disorders (the 3 studied disorders), the genus of Bacteroides is associated to MDD and ASD. It is interesting to note that the directions are inconsistent across the pathologies and studies.
Figure 6
For research where inconsistency was discovered across trials, we define consistency as more than 50% of studies consistently finding an association in the same direction. In Figure 7, we plotted Venn diagrams summarizing association to the neuropsychiatric disorders and check for overlap microbiota associated. We observed an overlap of the three pathologies for the Clostridium, Lactobacillus and Prevotella. Five genera were found in MDD and ASD (Bacteroides, Bifidobacterium, Dialister, Lachnospira and Steptococcus), 4 between MDD and schizophrenia (Coprococcus, Faecalbacterium, Holdemania, and Ruminococcus) and 2 between ASD and schizophrenia (Collinsella and Megasphaera).
Figure 7
However, Figure 7 does not take into account the direction of association. When comparing the direction of the association [Figure 8 (phylum, classer, order and family levels) and Figure 9 (genus level)], for MDD and ASD we found an increase in the relative abundance of Bacteroides and a decrease in the abundance of Dialister and Prevotella; opposite direction are found for Clostridium (increase in depression), Lachnospira (decrease in depression), Lactobacillus (decrease in depression), and Streptococcus (increase in depression). When comparing ASD and schizophrenia Collinsella, Megamonas, Megasphaera are found in the same direction (increase of relative abundance), while Clostridium and Prevotella are found in the opposite direction (decrease in ASD). Finally for depression and schizophrenia Clostridium, Collinsella, Holdemania are increased, Coprococcus and Faecalbacterium are decreased and opposite direction is found for Megamonas (decrease in depression) and Prevotella (decrease in depression).
Figure 8
Figure 9
Discussion
By far the most studied pathologies is ASD as well as the highest level of consistency as highlighted by the phylogenetic trees (Figure 3). Several studies (Luna et al., 2016; Finegold et al., 2017) compared patients with functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGID) and controls without FGID making the comparison of gut microbiota difficult to interpret since the two factors play a role in the composition of microbiota. Only one study compared ASD children with and without FGID with controls with and without FGID (Rose et al., 2018). Authors found differences at the Family level: Bacteroidaceae, Lachnospiraceae, Prevotellaceae and Ruminocaccaceae were more abundant in ASD with FGID compared to control with FGID, interestingly the same differences were not detected between patients and controls without FGID (Rose et al., 2018). For major depressive disorders although the number of included studies is high (n = 18) we did not find such consistency between the studies as for ASD (Figures 3, 4). However the field is growing and the evidences starting to emerge. Interestingly it has been demonstrated that women with post-partum depression also presented significant modifications of the microbiota (Zhou et al., 2020), which seems to indicate that the changes are occurring quite quick and are not associated to the chronicity of the MDD. The age of the patients also influences the modification seen in depression (Chen et al., 2020). Finally a study of twins with depression shows that the affected twins had a lower diversity and an absence of a specific operational taxonomical unit in comparison with healthy control (Vinberg et al., 2019). This leads us to question the impact and the interactions between the gene and the environment on the observed modifications.
There are several possible explanations about the mechanisms of action driving the relationship between gut microbiota and the different diseases. A recent review underlines the relationship among inflammation, pain, microbiota and the different lipids, focusing on the possible involvement of N-acylethanolamine family and short-chain fatty acids in the gut-brain axis and their role in the central nervous system diseases (Russo et al., 2018). The lymphatic system could be the mediator of this communication between the gut microbiota and the brain (Tsunoda, 2017).
In this review, we summarized the current evidence of the modification of the gut microbiota in various pathologies. We limited our analysis to the main neuropsychiatric diseases but gut microbiota composition is also modified in other neurological disorders such as Rett syndrome (Strati et al., 2016) and in neurocritically ill patients (Xu et al., 2019). However, their roles are not limited to neurological or neuropsychiatric diseases, they are also involved in hypertension (Li et al., 2017; Yan et al., 2017), cirrhosis (Bajaj et al., 2012; Bajaj et al., 2014) or primary hepatocellular carcinoma (Ni et al., 2019), diabetes (Chen et al., 2019), autoimmune diseases (Chen et al., 2017), Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (Luo et al., 2018), systemic immunity in allergic disease (Ipci et al., 2017), Behcet’s disease (Ye et al., 2018), systemic sclerosis (Patrone et al., 2017), rheumatoid arthritis (Liu et al., 2013) and could also potentially influence vitamin D production (Zuo et al., 2019) and there are correlation between some gut microbiota and personality in adults (Kim et al., 2018).
An essential part of the research in this field is the development of treatments to modify the microbiota. For example, intermittent fasting led to increased gut bacteria richness, enrichment of the Lactobacillaceae, Bacteroidaceae, and Prevotellaceae families and enhanced antioxidative microbial metabolic pathways (Cignarella et al., 2018). Changes in microbiota composition and clinical improvement have also been observed after specific diet (Libbey et al., 2018; Rice et al., 2019). Other promising results and modification of the gut microbiota have been obtained with fecal transplantation in animals and human studies (Evrensel and Ceylan, 2016; Sun et al., 2018). So far the most promising results of clinical improvement after modification of the gut microbiota have been obtained in patients with epilepsy after ketogenic diet (Zhang et al., 2018; Fan et al., 2019; Lindefeldt et al., 2019). The researchers showed that there was an overall decrease in the mean species diversity after treatment and importantly, a difference between the variation of species between responders and non-responders. Further analysis of species composition before and after treatment showed a significant increase in Bacteroides and a decrease in Firmicutes and Actinobacteria. When comparing responders and non-responders, Clostridiales, Clostridia, Ruminococcaeceae, Lachnospiraceaea, Alistipes and Tikenellacase were significantly increased in non-responders (Spinelli and Blackford, 2018).
Another main field of research is to determine if modification of the gut microbiota can decrease the risk of developing disease or improve the health of the patients: in Alzheimer’s disease (Mancuso and Santangelo, 2018), Parkinson’s disease (Sun and Shen, 2018), multiple sclerosis (Mirza and Mao-Draayer, 2017), amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (Zhang et al., 2017), and epilepsy (De Caro et al., 2019).
There are a few limitations in this review. The first one concerns the methodology used in the different studies: all studies used 16sRNA analysis but in some studies, corrections were applied for medication or constipation, two factors known to modify the composition of gut microbiota, while in most of the other studies these factors were not taken into consideration. Another technical point is that some authors applied corrections for multiple testing, some not and the techniques used are also different [e.g. Bonferroni’s correction for multiple testing or false discovery rate (Brenner et al., 2018)]; the results are different adjusting or not for multiple analyses [see for example study of Kang et al. presenting both results (Kang et al., 2018)]. Other studies used linear discriminant analysis (LDA) (usually LDA > 2.0) to differentiate patients and control (Liu et al., 2019). For all of the above limitations, we were not able to perform a meta-analysis which could provide a clearer vision of the direction and intensity of the modifications observed in the different diseases.
Because of a lack of existing data, we were not able to assess sex difference while it seems that, at least for some pathologies, there are differences between male and female (Chen et al., 2018; Holingue et al., 2020; Jaggar et al., 2020), as well as the ethnicities (Ventura et al., 2019). We also limit our analysis to genetic analysis of gut microbiota composition. Recent research also evaluate immune-inflammation (Carissimi et al., 2019) and gut glutamate metabolism (Wang et al., 2019) to differentiate patients and healthy controls.
The main limitation of the current studies are the populations investigated. We have seen that a majority of the studies have been done in China and in USA. This high homogeneity made the generalization and the translation of the results for these pathologies more limited since it has been shown that genetics (Simões et al., 2013; Matsuki et al., 2016), socioeconomic status (Bowyer et al., 2019), host and environmental factors (Anwar et al., 2021) and diet influence the composition of the microbiota serve a significant role in shaping the gut microbiota population (Bibbò et al., 2016; Chassaing et al., 2017; Proctor et al., 2017; Sandhu et al., 2017).
Of note is that we limited our analysis to binary responses between patients and controls but it is interesting to analyse the microbiota concentration as continuous variables since the severity of some diseases is correlated with the relative abundance of various microbiota. It has, for example, been shown that a greater severity of depressive symptoms was correlated with a greater abundance of genus Bacteroides (r = 0.70; p = 0.0002), while increased negative symptoms were associated with decreased abundance of family Ruminococcaceae (r = −0.74; p = 0.0002). Overall self-reported mental well-being was positively correlated with phylum Verrumicrobia (r = 0.63; p = 0.002) (Nguyen et al., 2019).
Another limitation is that we only included results of the studies using DNA sequencing of the fecal stool while it may also be interesting to study the composition of microbiota from different samples (Park et al., 2017). Depending on the diseases, other biota can be analysed and be a good indicator of the severity of the diseases, such as mouth microbiota in schizophrenia (Castro-Nallar et al., 2015; Yolken et al., 2015). Although the analysis of other microbiota may be challenging from the point of view of tissue collection, it has been showed that brain (Branton et al., 2016) – blood (Olde Loohuis et al., 2018) or direct microbiota analysis from the intestinal tissue (Cosorich et al., 2017) in patients multiple sclerosis could provide different type of information.
In the future analysing the changes in microbiota from nose to gut could also be an essential source of knowledge’s to get a better insight into the diseases (Bell et al., 2019). Finally, we limited our analysis at the genus level using 16S sequencing while it is possible to investigate the bacterial species in depth by sequencing the full genome, but only a few studies are currently performing this kind of analysis requiring deep sequencing methods.
Conclusion
The gut microbiota plays an important role in the development of neuropsychiatric diseases. We summarized the current pieces of evidence about the quantified modifications of the gut microbiota compositions in patients compared to healthy controls. The most remarkable microbiota signature was observed in ASD. For future clinical applications, baseline value and standard reporting template have just been developed that should ease and spread the analysis of gut microbiota in daily practice for the clinicians (King et al., 2019). The analysis of the gut microbiota could therefore be used to refine diagnostic or to assess the severity of MDD (Averina et al., 2020). There is currently an urgent need for standardization of the analysis and report of studies related to gut microbiota modification in order to move this field forward.
Publisher’s Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Statements
Author contributions
The study was conceived by BB and CD. NA and CD verified the analytical methods. BB, NA, and CD did the data interpretation. CD supervised the findings of this work. All authors discussed the results and contributed to the final manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcimb.2022.831666/full#supplementary-material
References
1
AdamsJ. B.JohansenL. J.PowellL. D.QuigD.RubinR. A. (2011). Gastrointestinal Flora and Gastrointestinal Status in Children With Autism–Comparisons to Typical Children and Correlation With Autism Severity. BMC Gastroenterol.11, 22. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-11-22
2
AhmedS. A.ElhefnawyA. M.AzouzH. G.RoshdyY. S.AshryM. H.IbrahimA. E.et al. (2020). Study of the Gut Microbiome Profile in Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Single Tertiary Hospital Experience. J. Mol. Neurosci. MN70, 887–896. doi: 10.1007/s12031-020-01500-3
3
AizawaE.TsujiH.AsaharaT.TakahashiT.TeraishiT.YoshidaS.et al. (2016). Possible Association of Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus in the Gut Microbiota of Patients With Major Depressive Disorder. J. Affect. Disord.202, 254–257. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2016.05.038
4
AnwarH.IftikharA.MuzaffarH.AlmatroudiA.AllemailemK. S.NavaidS.et al. (2021). Biodiversity of Gut Microbiota: Impact of Various Host and Environmental Factors. BioMed. Res. Int.2021, 5575245. doi: 10.1155/2021/5575245
5
AsnicarF.WeingartG.TickleT. L.HuttenhowerC.SegataN. (2015). Compact Graphical Representation of Phylogenetic Data and Metadata With GraPhlAn. PeerJ3, e1029. doi: 10.7717/peerj.1029
6
AverinaO. V.ZorkinaY. A.YunesR. A.KovtunA. S.UshakovaV. M.MorozovaA. Y.et al. (2020). Bacterial Metabolites of Human Gut Microbiota Correlating With Depression. Int. J. Mol. Sci.21, E9234. doi: 10.3390/ijms21239234
7
BajajJ. S.HeumanD. M.HylemonP. B.SanyalA. J.WhiteM. B.MonteithP.et al. (2014). Altered Profile of Human Gut Microbiome Is Associated With Cirrhosis and Its Complications. J. Hepatol.60, 940–947. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2013.12.019
8
BajajJ. S.HylemonP. B.RidlonJ. M.HeumanD. M.DaitaK.WhiteM. B.et al. (2012). Colonic Mucosal Microbiome Differs From Stool Microbiome in Cirrhosis and Hepatic Encephalopathy and Is Linked to Cognition and Inflammation. Am. J. Physiol. - Gastrointest Liver Physiol.303, G675–G685. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00152.2012
9
BellJ. S.SpencerJ. I.YatesR. L.YeeS. A.JacobsB. M.DeLucaG. C. (2019). Invited Review: From Nose to Gut - The Role of the Microbiome in Neurological Disease. Neuropathol. Appl. Neurobiol.45, 195–215. doi: 10.1111/nan.12520
10
BibbòS.IaniroG.GiorgioV.ScaldaferriF.MasucciL.GasbarriniA.et al. (2016). The Role of Diet on Gut Microbiota Composition. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci.20, 4742–4749.
11
BowyerR. C. E.JacksonM. A.Le RoyC. I.Ni LochlainnM.SpectorT. D.DowdJ. B.et al. (2019). Socioeconomic Status and the Gut Microbiome: A TwinsUK Cohort Study. Microorganisms7 (1), 37. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms7010017
12
BrantonW. G.LuJ. Q.SuretteM. G.HoltR. A.LindJ.LamanJ. D.et al. (2016). Brain Microbiota Disruption Within Inflammatory Demyelinating Lesions in Multiple Sclerosis. Sci. Rep.6, 37344. doi: 10.1038/srep37344
13
BrennerD.HiergeistA.AdisC.MayerB.GessnerA.LudolphA. C.et al. (2018). The Fecal Microbiome of ALS Patients. Neurobiol. Aging61, 132–137. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2017.09.023
14
CarissimiC.LaudadioI.PaloneF.FulciV.CesiV.CardonaF.et al. (2019). Functional Analysis of Gut Microbiota and Immunoinflammation in Children With Autism Spectrum Disorders. Dig Liver Dis. Off J. Ital Soc. Gastroenterol. Ital Assoc. Study Liver51, 1366–1374. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2019.06.006
15
Castro-NallarE.BendallM. L.Pérez-LosadaM.SabuncyanS.SeveranceE. G.DickersonF. B.et al. (2015). Composition, Taxonomy and Functional Diversity of the Oropharynx Microbiome in Individuals With Schizophrenia and Controls. PeerJ3, e1140. doi: 10.7717/peerj.1140
16
ChassaingB.Vijay-KumarM.GewirtzA. T. (2017). How Diet Can Impact Gut Microbiota to Promote or Endanger Health. Curr. Opin. Gastroenterol.33, 417–421. doi: 10.1097/MOG.0000000000000401
17
ChenH.BoutrosP. C. (2011). VennDiagram: A Package for the Generation of Highly-Customizable Venn and Euler Diagrams in R. BMC Bioinf.12, 35. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-12-35
18
ChenP.-C.ChienY.-W.YangS.-C. (2019). The Alteration of Gut Microbiota in Newly Diagnosed Type 2 Diabetic Patients. Nutr. Burbank Los Angel Cty Calif.63–64, 51–56. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2018.11.019
19
ChenY.FangH.LiC.WuG.XuT.YangX.et al. (2020). Gut Bacteria Shared by Children and Their Mothers Associate With Developmental Level and Social Deficits in Autism Spectrum Disorder. mSphere5 (6), e01044–20. doi: 10.1128/mSphere.01044-20
20
ChenJ.-J.HeS.FangL.WangB.BaiS.-J.XieJ.et al. (2020). Age-Specific Differential Changes on Gut Microbiota Composition in Patients With Major Depressive Disorder. Aging12, 2764–2776. doi: 10.18632/aging.102775
21
ChenZ.LiJ.GuiS.ZhouC.ChenJ.YangC.et al. (2018). Comparative Metaproteomics Analysis Shows Altered Fecal Microbiota Signatures in Patients With Major Depressive Disorder. Neuroreport29, 417–425. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0000000000000985
22
ChenB.SunL.ZhangX. (2017). Integration of Microbiome and Epigenome to Decipher the Pathogenesis of Autoimmune Diseases. J. Autoimmun83, 31–42. doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2017.03.009
23
ChenJ.-J.ZhengP.LiuY.-Y.ZhongX.-G.WangH.-Y.GuoY.-J.et al. (2018). Sex Differences in Gut Microbiota in Patients With Major Depressive Disorder. Neuropsychiatr. Dis. Treat14, 647–655. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S159322
24
CheungS. G.GoldenthalA. R.UhlemannA.-C.MannJ. J.MillerJ. M.SubletteM. E. (2019). Systematic Review of Gut Microbiota and Major Depression. Front. Psychiatry10, 34. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00034
25
ChungY.-C. E.ChenH.-C.ChouH.-C. L.ChenI.-M.LeeM.-S.ChuangL.-C.et al. (2019). Exploration of Microbiota Targets for Major Depressive Disorder and Mood Related Traits. J. Psychiatr. Res.111, 74–82. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2019.01.016
26
CignarellaF.CantoniC.GhezziL.SalterA.DorsettY.ChenL.et al. (2018). Intermittent Fasting Confers Protection in CNS Autoimmunity by Altering the Gut Microbiota. Cell Metab.27, 1222–1235.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2018.05.006
27
CosorichI.Dalla-CostaG.SoriniC.FerrareseR.MessinaM. J.DolpadyJ.et al. (2017). High Frequency of Intestinal TH17 Cells Correlates With Microbiota Alterations and Disease Activity in Multiple Sclerosis. Sci. Adv.3, e1700492. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1700492
28
De CaroC.IannoneL. F.CitraroR.StrianoP.De SarroG.ConstantiA.et al. (2019). Can We ‘Seize’ the Gut Microbiota to Treat Epilepsy? Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev.107, 750–764. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.10.002
29
DingX.XuY.ZhangX.ZhangL.DuanG.SongC.et al. (2020). Gut Microbiota Changes in Patients With Autism Spectrum Disorders. J. Psychiatr. Res.129, 149–159. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2020.06.032
30
DuY.GaoX.-R.PengL.GeJ.-F. (2020). Crosstalk Between the Microbiota-Gut-Brain Axis and Depression. Heliyon6, e04097. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04097
31
EvrenselA.CeylanM. E. (2016). Fecal Microbiota Transplantation and Its Usage in Neuropsychiatric Disorders. Clin. Psychopharmacol. Neurosci. Off Sci. J. Korean Coll. Neuropsychopharmacol.14, 231–237. doi: 10.9758/cpn.2016.14.3.231
32
FanY.WangH.LiuX.ZhangJ.LiuG. (2019). Crosstalk Between the Ketogenic Diet and Epilepsy: From the Perspective of Gut Microbiota. Mediators Inflamm.2019, 8373060. doi: 10.1155/2019/8373060
33
FinegoldS. M.SummanenP. H.DownesJ.CorbettK.KomoriyaT. (2017). Detection of Clostridium Perfringens Toxin Genes in the Gut Microbiota of Autistic Children. Anaerobe45, 133–137. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2017.02.008
34
FontanaA.ManchiaM.PanebiancoC.ParibelloP.ArzediC.CossuE.et al. (2020). Exploring the Role of Gut Microbiota in Major Depressive Disorder and in Treatment Resistance to Antidepressants. Biomedicines8 (9), 311. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines8090311
35
GolofastB.ValesK. (2020). The Connection Between Microbiome and Schizophrenia. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev.108, 712–731. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.12.011
36
GondaliaS. V.PalomboE. A.KnowlesS. R.CoxS. B.MeyerD.AustinD. W. (2012). Molecular Characterisation of Gastrointestinal Microbiota of Children With Autism (With and Without Gastrointestinal Dysfunction) and Their Neurotypical Siblings. Autism Res. Off J. Int. Soc. Autism Res.5, 419–427. doi: 10.1002/aur.1253
37
HeissC. N.OlofssonL. E. (2019). The Role of the Gut Microbiota in Development, Function and Disorders of the Central Nervous System and the Enteric Nervous System. J. Neuroendocrinol31, e12684. doi: 10.1111/jne.12684
38
HolingueC.BudavariA. C.RodriguezK. M.ZismanC. R.WindheimG.FallinM. D. (2020). Sex Differences in the Gut-Brain Axis: Implications for Mental Health. Curr. Psychiatry Rep.22, 83. doi: 10.1007/s11920-020-01202-y
39
IoveneM. R.BombaceF.MarescaR.SaponeA.IardinoP.PicardiA.et al. (2017). Intestinal Dysbiosis and Yeast Isolation in Stool of Subjects With Autism Spectrum Disorders. Mycopathologia182, 349–363. doi: 10.1007/s11046-016-0068-6
40
IpciK.AltıntoprakN.MulukN. B.SenturkM.CingiC. (2017). The Possible Mechanisms of the Human Microbiome in Allergic Diseases. Eur. Arch. Oto-Rhino-Laryngol Off J. Eur. Fed Oto-Rhino-Laryngol Soc. EUFOS Affil Ger Soc. Oto-Rhino-Laryngol - Head Neck Surg.274, 617–626. doi: 10.1007/s00405-016-4058-6
41
JaggarM.ReaK.SpichakS.DinanT. G.CryanJ. F. (2020). You’ve Got Male: Sex and the Microbiota-Gut-Brain Axis Across the Lifespan. Front. Neuroendocrinol56, 100815. doi: 10.1016/j.yfrne.2019.100815
42
JiangH.LingZ.ZhangY.MaoH.MaZ.YinY.et al. (2015). Altered Fecal Microbiota Composition in Patients With Major Depressive Disorder. Brain Behav. Immun.48, 186–194. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2015.03.016
43
KangD.-W.IlhanZ. E.IsernN. G.HoytD. W.HowsmonD. P.ShafferM.et al. (2018). Differences in Fecal Microbial Metabolites and Microbiota of Children With Autism Spectrum Disorders. Anaerobe49, 121–131. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2017.12.007
44
KangD.-W.ParkJ. G.IlhanZ. E.WallstromG.LabaerJ.AdamsJ. B.et al. (2013). Reduced Incidence of Prevotella and Other Fermenters in Intestinal Microflora of Autistic Children. PloS One8, e68322. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0068322
45
KellerJ.GomezR.WilliamsG.LembkeA.LazzeroniL.MurphyG. M.et al. (2017). HPA Axis in Major Depression: Cortisol, Clinical Symptomatology and Genetic Variation Predict Cognition. Mol. Psychiatry22, 527–536. doi: 10.1038/mp.2016.120
46
KellyJ. R.BorreY.O’ BrienC.PattersonE.El AidyS.DeaneJ.et al. (2016). Transferring the Blues: Depression-Associated Gut Microbiota Induces Neurobehavioural Changes in the Rat. J. Psychiatr. Res.82, 109–118. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2016.07.019
47
KellyJ. R.KeaneV. O.CryanJ. F.ClarkeG.DinanT. G. (2019). Mood and Microbes: Gut to Brain Communication in Depression. Gastroenterol. Clin. North Am.48, 389–405. doi: 10.1016/j.gtc.2019.04.006
48
KimH.-N.YunY.RyuS.ChangY.KwonM.-J.ChoJ.et al. (2018). Correlation Between Gut Microbiota and Personality in Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study. Brain Behav. Immun.69, 374–385. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2017.12.012
49
KingC. H.DesaiH.SylvetskyA. C.LoTempioJ.AyanyanS.CarrieJ.et al. (2019). Baseline Human Gut Microbiota Profile in Healthy People and Standard Reporting Template. PloS One14, e0206484. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206484
50
KushakR. I.WinterH. S.BuieT. M.CoxS. B.PhillipsC. D.WardN. L. (2017). Analysis of the Duodenal Microbiome in Autistic Individuals: Association With Carbohydrate Digestion. J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr.64, e110–e116. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000001458
51
LaiW.DengW.XuS.ZhaoJ.XuD.LiuY.et al. (2019). Shotgun Metagenomics Reveals Both Taxonomic and Tryptophan Pathway Differences of Gut Microbiota in Major Depressive Disorder Patients. Psychol. Med.51 (1), 1–12. doi: 10.1017/S0033291719003027
52
LibbeyJ. E.SanchezJ. M.DotyD. J.SimJ. T.CusickM. F.CoxJ. E.et al. (2018). Variations in Diet Cause Alterations in Microbiota and Metabolites That Follow Changes in Disease Severity in a Multiple Sclerosis Model. Benef Microbes9, 495–513. doi: 10.3920/BM2017.0116
53
LindefeldtM.EngA.DarbanH.BjerknerA.ZetterströmC. K.AllanderT.et al. (2019). The Ketogenic Diet Influences Taxonomic and Functional Composition of the Gut Microbiota in Children With Severe Epilepsy. NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes5, 5. doi: 10.1038/s41522-018-0073-2
54
LinP.DingB.FengC.YinS.ZhangT.QiX.et al. (2017). Prevotella and Klebsiella Proportions in Fecal Microbial Communities Are Potential Characteristic Parameters for Patients With Major Depressive Disorder. J. Affect. Disord.207, 300–304. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2016.09.051
55
LiuS.LiE.SunZ.FuD.DuanG.JiangM.et al. (2019). Altered Gut Microbiota and Short Chain Fatty Acids in Chinese Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder. Sci. Rep.9, 287. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-36430-z
56
LiuR. T.Rowan-NashA. D.SheehanA. E.WalshR. F. L.SanzariC. M.KorryB. J.et al. (2020). Reductions in Anti-Inflammatory Gut Bacteria Are Associated With Depression in a Sample of Young Adults. Brain Behav. Immun.88, 308–324. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2020.03.026
57
LiuY.ZhangL.WangX.WangZ.ZhangJ.JiangR.et al. (2016). Similar Fecal Microbiota Signatures in Patients With Diarrhea-Predominant Irritable Bowel Syndrome and Patients With Depression. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol.14, 1602–1611.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2016.05.033
58
LiuX.ZouQ.ZengB.FangY.WeiH. (2013). Analysis of Fecal Lactobacillus Community Structure in Patients With Early Rheumatoid Arthritis. Curr. Microbiol.67, 170–176. doi: 10.1007/s00284-013-0338-1
59
LiJ.ZhaoF.WangY.ChenJ.TaoJ.TianG.et al. (2017). Gut Microbiota Dysbiosis Contributes to the Development of Hypertension. Microbiome5, 14. doi: 10.1186/s40168-016-0222-x
60
LiS.ZhuoM.HuangX.HuangY.ZhouJ.XiongD.et al. (2020). Altered Gut Microbiota Associated With Symptom Severity in Schizophrenia. PeerJ8, e9574. doi: 10.7717/peerj.9574
61
LunaR. A.OezguenN.BalderasM.VenkatachalamA.RungeJ. K.VersalovicJ.et al. (2016). Distinct Microbiome-Neuroimmune Signatures Correlate With Functional Abdominal Pain in Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder. Cell Mol. Gastroenterol. Hepatol.3, 218–230. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmgh.2016.11.008
62
LuoX. M.EdwardsM. R.MuQ.YuY.ViesonM. D.ReillyC. M.et al. (2018). Gut Microbiota in Human Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and a Mouse Model of Lupus. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.84 (4), e02288–17. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02288-17
63
MaX.AsifH.DaiL.HeY.ZhengW.WangD.et al. (2020). Alteration of the Gut Microbiome in First-Episode Drug-Naïve and Chronic Medicated Schizophrenia Correlate With Regional Brain Volumes. J. Psychiatr. Res.123, 136–144. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2020.02.005
64
MaB.LiangJ.DaiM.WangJ.LuoJ.ZhangZ.et al. (2019). Altered Gut Microbiota in Chinese Children With Autism Spectrum Disorders. Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol.9, 40. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2019.00040
65
MancusoC.SantangeloR. (2018). Alzheimer’s Disease and Gut Microbiota Modifications: The Long Way Between Preclinical Studies and Clinical Evidence. Pharmacol. Res.129, 329–336. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2017.12.009
66
MasonB. L.LiQ.MinhajuddinA.CzyszA. H.CoughlinL. A.HussainS. K.et al. (2020). Reduced Anti-Inflammatory Gut Microbiota Are Associated With Depression and Anhedonia. J. Affect. Disord.266, 394–401. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.01.137
67
MatsukiT.YahagiK.MoriH.MatsumotoH.HaraT.TajimaS.et al. (2016). A Key Genetic Factor for Fucosyllactose Utilization Affects Infant Gut Microbiota Development. Nat. Commun.7, 11939. doi: 10.1038/ncomms11939
68
MirzaA.Mao-DraayerY. (2017). The Gut Microbiome and Microbial Translocation in Multiple Sclerosis. Clin. Immunol. Orlando Fla183, 213–224. doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2017.03.001
69
NaseribafroueiA.HestadK.AvershinaE.SekeljaM.LinløkkenA.WilsonR.et al. (2014). Correlation Between the Human Fecal Microbiota and Depression. Neurogastroenterol Motil. Off J. Eur. Gastrointest Motil. Soc.26, 1155–1162. doi: 10.1111/nmo.12378
70
NguyenT. T.KosciolekT.MaldonadoY.DalyR. E.MartinA. S.McDonaldD.et al. (2019). Differences in Gut Microbiome Composition Between Persons With Chronic Schizophrenia and Healthy Comparison Subjects. Schizophr. Res.204, 23–29. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2018.09.014
71
NiJ.HuangR.ZhouH.XuX.LiY.CaoP.et al. (2019). Analysis of the Relationship Between the Degree of Dysbiosis in Gut Microbiota and Prognosis at Different Stages of Primary Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Front. Microbiol.10, 1458. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01458
72
Olde LoohuisL. M.MangulS.OriA. P. S.JospinG.KoslickiD.YangH. T.et al. (2018). Transcriptome Analysis in Whole Blood Reveals Increased Microbial Diversity in Schizophrenia. Transl. Psychiatry8, 96. doi: 10.1038/s41398-018-0107-9
73
PanR.ZhangX.GaoJ.YiW.WeiQ.SuH. (2020). Analysis of the Diversity of Intestinal Microbiome and Its Potential Value as a Biomarker in Patients With Schizophrenia: A Cohort Study. Psychiatry Res.291, 113260. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113260
74
ParkA.-M.OmuraS.FujitaM.SatoF.TsunodaI. (2017). Helicobacter Pylori and Gut Microbiota in Multiple Sclerosis Versus Alzheimer’s Disease: 10 Pitfalls of Microbiome Studies. Clin. Exp. Neuroimmunol8, 215–232. doi: 10.1111/cen3.12401
75
PatroneV.PuglisiE.CardinaliM.SchnitzlerT. S.SvegliatiS.FestaA.et al. (2017). Gut Microbiota Profile in Systemic Sclerosis Patients With and Without Clinical Evidence of Gastrointestinal Involvement. Sci. Rep.7, 14874. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-14889-6
76
PeirceJ. M.AlviñaK. (2019). The Role of Inflammation and the Gut Microbiome in Depression and Anxiety. J. Neurosci. Res.97, 1223–1241. doi: 10.1002/jnr.24476
77
Plaza-DíazJ.Gómez-FernándezA.ChuecaN.de la Torre-AguilarM. J.GilÁPerez-NaveroJ. L.et al. (2019). Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) With and Without Mental Regression Is Associated With Changes in the Fecal Microbiota. Nutrients11(2), 337–349. doi: 10.3390/nu11020337
78
ProctorC.ThiennimitrP.ChattipakornN.ChattipakornS. C. (2017). Diet, Gut Microbiota and Cognition. Metab. Brain Dis.32, 1–17. doi: 10.1007/s11011-016-9917-8
79
PulikkanJ.MajiA.DhakanD. B.SaxenaR.MohanB.AntoM. M.et al. (2018). Gut Microbial Dysbiosis in Indian Children With Autism Spectrum Disorders. Microb. Ecol.76, 1102–1114. doi: 10.1007/s00248-018-1176-2
80
RiceM. W.PandyaJ. D.ShearD. A. (2019). Gut Microbiota as a Therapeutic Target to Ameliorate the Biochemical, Neuroanatomical, and Behavioral Effects of Traumatic Brain Injuries. Front. Neurol.10, 875. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00875
81
RongH.XieX.ZhaoJ.LaiW.WangM.XuD.et al. (2019). Similarly in Depression, Nuances of Gut Microbiota: Evidences From a Shotgun Metagenomics Sequencing Study on Major Depressive Disorder Versus Bipolar Disorder With Current Major Depressive Episode Patients. J. Psychiatr. Res.113, 90–99. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2019.03.017
82
RoseD. R.YangH.SerenaG.SturgeonC.MaB.CareagaM.et al. (2018). Differential Immune Responses and Microbiota Profiles in Children With Autism Spectrum Disorders and Co-Morbid Gastrointestinal Symptoms. Brain Behav. Immun.70, 354–368. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2018.03.025
83
RussoR.CristianoC.AvaglianoC.De CaroC.La RanaG.RasoG. M.et al. (2018). Gut-Brain Axis: Role of Lipids in the Regulation of Inflammation, Pain and CNS Diseases. Curr. Med. Chem.25, 3930–3952. doi: 10.2174/0929867324666170216113756
84
SandhuK. V.SherwinE.SchellekensH.StantonC.DinanT. G.CryanJ. F. (2017). Feeding the Microbiota-Gut-Brain Axis: Diet, Microbiome, and Neuropsychiatry. Transl. Res. J. Lab. Clin. Med.179, 223–244. doi: 10.1016/j.trsl.2016.10.002
85
SasmitaA. O. (2019). Modification of the Gut Microbiome to Combat Neurodegeneration. Rev. Neurosci30 (8), 795–805. doi: 10.1515/revneuro-2019-0005
86
SaurmanV.MargolisK. G.LunaR. A. (2020). Autism Spectrum Disorder as a Brain-Gut-Microbiome Axis Disorder. Dig Dis. Sci.65, 818–828. doi: 10.1007/s10620-020-06133-5
87
SchwarzE.MaukonenJ.HyytiäinenT.KieseppäT.OrešičM.SabunciyanS.et al. (2018). Analysis of Microbiota in First Episode Psychosis Identifies Preliminary Associations With Symptom Severity and Treatment Response. Schizophr. Res.192, 398–403. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2017.04.017
88
SeguellaL.CapuanoR.SarnelliG.EspositoG. (2019). Play in Advance Against Neurodegeneration: Exploring Enteric Glial Cells in Gut-Brain Axis During Neurodegenerative Diseases. Expert Rev. Clin. Pharmacol.12, 555–564. doi: 10.1080/17512433.2019.1612744
89
ShenY.XuJ.LiZ.HuangY.YuanY.WangJ.et al. (2018). Analysis of Gut Microbiota Diversity and Auxiliary Diagnosis as a Biomarker in Patients With Schizophrenia: A Cross-Sectional Study. Schizophr. Res.197, 470–477. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2018.01.002
90
SimõesC. D.MaukonenJ.KaprioJ.RissanenA.PietiläinenK. H.SaarelaM. (2013). Habitual Dietary Intake Is Associated With Stool Microbiota Composition in Monozygotic Twins. J. Nutr.143, 417–423. doi: 10.3945/jn.112.166322
91
SonJ. S.ZhengL. J.RowehlL. M.TianX.ZhangY.ZhuW.et al. (2015). Comparison of Fecal Microbiota in Children With Autism Spectrum Disorders and Neurotypical Siblings in the Simons Simplex Collection. PloS One10, e0137725. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0137725
92
SpinelliE.BlackfordR.Gut Microbiota, the Ketogenic Diet and Epilepsy. Pediatr. Neurol. Briefs (2018) 32, 10. doi: 10.15844/pedneurbriefs-32-10
93
StillingR. M.DinanT. G.CryanJ. F. (2014). Microbial Genes, Brain & Behaviour - Epigenetic Regulation of the Gut-Brain Axis. Genes Brain Behav.13, 69–86. doi: 10.1111/gbb.12109
94
StratiF.CavalieriD.AlbaneseD.De FeliceC.DonatiC.HayekJ.et al. (2016). Altered Gut Microbiota in Rett Syndrome. Microbiome4, 41. doi: 10.1186/s40168-016-0185-y
95
StratiF.CavalieriD.AlbaneseD.De FeliceC.DonatiC.HayekJ.et al. (2017). New Evidences on the Altered Gut Microbiota in Autism Spectrum Disorders. Microbiome5 (1), 24. doi: 10.1186/s40168-017-0242-1
96
SunM.-F.ShenY.-Q. (2018). Dysbiosis of Gut Microbiota and Microbial Metabolites in Parkinson’s Disease. Ageing Res. Rev.45, 53–61. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2018.04.004
97
SunH.YouZ.JiaL.WangF. (2019). Autism Spectrum Disorder Is Associated With Gut Microbiota Disorder in Children. BMC Pediatr.19, 516. doi: 10.1186/s12887-019-1896-6
98
SunM.-F.ZhuY.-L.ZhouZ.-L.JiaX.-B.XuY.-D.YangQ.et al. (2018). Neuroprotective Effects of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation on MPTP-Induced Parkinson’s Disease Mice: Gut Microbiota, Glial Reaction and TLR4/TNF-α Signaling Pathway. Brain Behav. Immun.70, 48–60. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2018.02.005
99
TomovaA.HusarovaV.LakatosovaS.BakosJ.VlkovaB.BabinskaK.et al. (2015). Gastrointestinal Microbiota in Children With Autism in Slovakia. Physiol. Behav.138, 179–187. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2014.10.033
100
TsunodaI. (2017). Lymphatic System and Gut Microbiota Affect Immunopathology of Neuroinflammatory Diseases, Including Multiple Sclerosis, Neuromyelitis Optica and Alzheimer’s Disease. Clin. Exp. Neuroimmunol8, 177–179. doi: 10.1111/cen3.12405
101
Valles-ColomerM.FalonyG.DarziY.TigchelaarE. F.WangJ.TitoR. Y.et al. (2019). The Neuroactive Potential of the Human Gut Microbiota in Quality of Life and Depression. Nat. Microbiol.4, 623–632. doi: 10.1038/s41564-018-0337-x
102
VenturaR. E.IizumiT.BattagliaT.LiuM.Perez-PerezG. I.HerbertJ.et al. (2019). Gut Microbiome of Treatment-Naïve MS Patients of Different Ethnicities Early in Disease Course. Sci. Rep.9, 16396. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-52894-z
103
VinbergM.OttesenN. M.MelukenI.SørensenN.PedersenO.KessingL. V.et al. (2019). Remitted Affective Disorders and High Familial Risk of Affective Disorders Associate With Aberrant Intestinal Microbiota. Acta Psychiatr. Scand.139, 174–184. doi: 10.1111/acps.12976
104
WangL.ChristophersenC. T.SorichM. J.GerberJ. P.AngleyM. T.ConlonM. A. (2011). Low Relative Abundances of the Mucolytic Bacterium Akkermansia Muciniphila and Bifidobacterium Spp. In Feces of Children With Autism. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.77, 6718–6721. doi: 10.1128/AEM.05212-11
105
WangY.KasperL. H. (2014). The Role of Microbiome in Central Nervous System Disorders. Brain Behav. Immun.38, 1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2013.12.015
106
WangM.WanJ.RongH.HeF.WangH.ZhouJ.et al. (2019). Alterations in Gut Glutamate Metabolism Associated With Changes in Gut Microbiota Composition in Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder. mSystems4 (1), e00321–18. doi: 10.1128/mSystems.00321-18
107
XuR.TanC.ZhuJ.ZengX.GaoX.WuQ.et al. (2019). Dysbiosis of the Intestinal Microbiota in Neurocritically Ill Patients and the Risk for Death. Crit. Care Lond Engl.23, 195. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2488-4
108
XuR.WuB.LiangJ.HeF.GuW.LiK.et al. (2019). Altered Gut Microbiota and Mucosal Immunity in Patients With Schizophrenia. Brain Behav. Immun85, 120–7. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2019.06.039
109
XuR.WuB.LiangJ.HeF.GuW.LiK.et al. (2020). Altered Gut Microbiota and Mucosal Immunity in Patients With Schizophrenia. Brain Behav. Immun.85, 120–127. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2019.06.039
110
YanQ.GuY.LiX.YangW.JiaL.ChenC.et al. (2017). Alterations of the Gut Microbiome in Hypertension. Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol.7, 381. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2017.00381
111
YeZ.ZhangN.WuC.ZhangX.WangQ.HuangX.et al. (2018). A Metagenomic Study of the Gut Microbiome in Behcet’s Disease. Microbiome6, 135. doi: 10.1186/s40168-018-0520-6
112
YolkenR. H.SeveranceE. G.SabunciyanS.GressittK. L.ChenO.StallingsC.et al. (2015). Metagenomic Sequencing Indicates That the Oropharyngeal Phageome of Individuals With Schizophrenia Differs From That of Controls. Schizophr. Bull.41, 1153–1161. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbu197
113
ZhaiQ.CenS.JiangJ.ZhaoJ.ZhangH.ChenW. (2019). Disturbance of Trace Element and Gut Microbiota Profiles as Indicators of Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Pilot Study of Chinese Children. Environ. Res.171, 501–509. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2019.01.060
114
ZhangM.MaW.ZhangJ.HeY.WangJ. (2018). Analysis of Gut Microbiota Profiles and Microbe-Disease Associations in Children With Autism Spectrum Disorders in China. Sci. Rep.8 (1), 13981. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-32219-2
115
ZhangX.PanL.-Y.ZhangZ.ZhouY.-Y.JiangH.-Y.RuanB. (2020). Analysis of Gut Mycobiota in First-Episode, Drug-Naïve Chinese Patients With Schizophrenia: A Pilot Study. Behav. Brain Res.379, 112374. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2019.112374
116
ZhangY.-G.WuS.YiJ.XiaY.JinD.ZhouJ.et al. (2017). Target Intestinal Microbiota to Alleviate Disease Progression in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. Clin. Ther.39, 322–336. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2016.12.014
117
ZhangY.ZhouS.ZhouY.YuL.ZhangL.WangY. (2018). Altered Gut Microbiome Composition in Children With Refractory Epilepsy After Ketogenic Diet. Epilepsy Res.145, 163–168. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2018.06.015
118
ZhengP.YangJ.LiY.WuJ.LiangW.YinB.et al. (2020). Gut Microbial Signatures Can Discriminate Unipolar From Bipolar Depression. Adv. Sci.7(7), 1902862. doi: 10.1002/advs.201902862
119
ZhengP.ZengB.ZhouC.LiuM.FangZ.XuX.et al. (2016). Gut Microbiome Remodeling Induces Depressive-Like Behaviors Through a Pathway Mediated by the Host’s Metabolism. Mol. Psychiatry21, 786–796. doi: 10.1038/mp.2016.44
120
ZhouY.ChenC.YuH.YangZ. (2020). Fecal Microbiota Changes in Patients With Postpartum Depressive Disorder. Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol.10, 567268. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2020.567268
121
ZmoraN.SuezJ.ElinavE. (2019). You Are What You Eat: Diet, Health and the Gut Microbiota. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol.16, 35–56. doi: 10.1038/s41575-018-0061-2
122
ZouR.XuF.WangY.DuanM.GuoM.ZhangQ.et al. (2020). Changes in the Gut Microbiota of Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder. Autism Res.13, 1614–1625. doi: 10.1002/aur.2358
123
ZuoK.LiJ.XuQ.HuC.GaoY.ChenM.et al. (2019). Dysbiotic Gut Microbes May Contribute to Hypertension by Limiting Vitamin D Production. Clin. Cardiol.42, 710–719. doi: 10.1002/clc.23195
Summary
Keywords
gut microbiota, psychiatric diseases, autism spectrum disorders, depression, schizophrenia
Citation
Bonnechère B, Amin N and van Duijn C (2022) The Role of Gut Microbiota in Neuropsychiatric Diseases – Creation of An Atlas-Based on Quantified Evidence. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 12:831666. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.831666
Received
08 December 2021
Accepted
21 February 2022
Published
14 March 2022
Volume
12 - 2022
Edited by
Riadh Hammami, University of Ottawa, Canada
Reviewed by
Lorena Coretti, University of Naples Federico II, Italy; Sylvie Vancassel, INRA Centre Bordeaux-Aquitaine, France
Updates
Copyright
© 2022 Bonnechère, Amin and van Duijn.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Cornelia van Duijn, cornelia.vanduijn@ndph.ox.ac.uk
This article was submitted to Microbiome in Health and Disease, a section of the journal Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.