In the published article, there were two errors in Table 4, Post-hoc cross-sectional analysis exploring the main effect for group, as published. There is a missing “ < ” symbol for understanding scores at 24-months, and an incorrect “ < ” symbol for object use scores at 24 months under the post-Hoc comparisons column. The corrected Table 4, Post-hoc cross-sectional analysis exploring the main effect for group, appears below.
Table 4
| CSBS scores | HL-ASD (a) | HL-Neg (b) | LL-Neg (c) | Overall group comparison | Post-Hoc comparisons | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EMM | SE | EMM | SE | EMM | SE | df | SS | F | q | f2 | ||
| 12-months | ||||||||||||
| Emotion eye gaze (N = 378) | 9.63 | 0.44 | 10.95 | 0.23 | 12.06 | 0.33 | 2 | 213.90 | 9.88 | < 0.01* | 0.07 | a < b < c |
| Communication (N = 396) | 9.07 | 0.56 | 11.80 | 0.29 | 12.89 | 0.42 | 2 | 549.60 | 15.17 | < 0.01* | 0.10 | a < b, c |
| Gestures (N = 396) | 6.57 | 0.47 | 8.53 | 0.24 | 9.92 | 0.35 | 2 | 415.30 | 16.45 | < 0.01* | 0.10 | a < b < c |
| Sounds (N = 396) | 3.52 | 0.59 | 6.34 | 0.31 | 5.73 | 0.44 | 2 | 375.50 | 9.32 | < 0.01* | 0.06 | a < b, c |
| Words (N = 396) | 0.40 | 0.24 | 1.00 | 0.13 | 0.95 | 0.18 | 2 | 17.86 | 2.62 | 0.25 | 0.02 | a, b, c |
| Understanding (N = 262) | 1.04 | 0.54 | 1.62 | 0.29 | 2.07 | 0.41 | 2 | 25.26 | 1.67 | 0.42 | 0.01 | a, b, c |
| Object use (N = 334) | 4.84 | 0.47 | 5.91 | 0.26 | 6.29 | 0.36 | 2 | 69.90 | 3.14 | 0.05 | 0.02 | a, b, c |
| 24-months | ||||||||||||
| Emotion and eye gaze (N = 410) | 9.96 | 0.38 | 14.49 | 0.19 | 14.34 | 0.27 | 2 | 1,016.00 | 60.18 | < 0.01* | 0.30 | a < b, c |
| Communication (N = 432) | 13.40 | 0.43 | 17.50 | 0.22 | 16.70 | 0.31 | 2 | 853.30 | 37.03 | < 0.01* | 0.19 | a < b, c |
| Gestures (N = 432) | 9.08 | 0.45 | 12.59 | 0.23 | 12.53 | 0.32 | 2 | 651.90 | 26.63 | < 0.01* | 0.14 | a < b, c |
| Sounds (N = 432) | 13.00 | 0.69 | 19.60 | 0.36 | 19.20 | 0.50 | 2 | 2,246.90 | 37.73 | < 0.01* | 0.19 | a < b, c |
| Words (N = 432) | 9.55 | 0.99 | 17.75 | 0.51 | 18.78 | 0.71 | 2 | 4,008.20 | 33.43 | < 0.01* | 0.18 | a < b, c |
| Understanding (N = 289) | 8.27 | 1.03 | 17.44 | 0.54 | 19.70 | 0.66 | 2 | 3,745.00 | 45.39 | < 0.01* | 0.36 | a < b < c |
| Object use (N = 413) | 10.20 | 0.56 | 13.60 | 0.28 | 13.70 | 0.41 | 2 | 608.00 | 16.72 | < 0.01* | 0.10 | a < b, c |
Post-hoc cross-sectional analysis exploring the main effect for group.
*Significant interaction that survived adaptive FDR procedure.
The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions made in the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
Statements
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Summary
Keywords
autism, language, social communication, longitudinal, infancy
Citation
Ravi S, Bradshaw A, Abdi H, Meera SS, Parish-Morris J, Yankowitz L, Paterson S, Dager SR, Burrows CA, Chappell C, St.John T, Estes AM, Piven J, Swanson MR and The IBIS Network (2023) Corrigendum: Are early social communication skills a harbinger for language development in infants later diagnosed autistic?—A longitudinal study using a standardized social communication assessment. Front. Commun. 8:1120237. doi: 10.3389/fcomm.2023.1120237
Received
09 December 2022
Accepted
02 January 2023
Published
01 February 2023
Approved by
Frontiers Editorial Office, Frontiers Media SA, Switzerland
Volume
8 - 2023
Updates
Copyright
© 2023 Ravi, Bradshaw, Abdi, Meera, Parish-Morris, Yankowitz, Paterson, Dager, Burrows, Chappell, St.John, Estes, Piven, Swanson and the IBIS Network.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Shruthi Ravi ✉ Shruthi.Ravi1@utdallas.edu
†These authors share senior authorship
This article was submitted to Language Sciences, a section of the journal Frontiers in Communication
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.