In the original article, there was a mistake in Table 1 as published. The wrong Table was inserted. The corrected Table 1 appears below.
Table 1
| Main codes | Child codes | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| CKB Use | CKB as future reference | Referring to research of others | CKB and lecture linkage |
| Community of Learners | Collaborative learning | CKB and lecture linkage | Referring to research of others |
| Inquiry Learning | Research above and beyond | Compelled (pushed, forced) to do research | Gained expertise |
| Future Application | Real life experiences | CKB as future reference | Gained expertise |
NVivo Main and Child Codes used to analyze test question and focus groups.
In the original article, there was an error. The word “three” should be deleted and the word “two” inserted in its place.
A correction has been made to the Interpretive Frameworks section, Paragraph eight (8). The sentence should read: Specifically, this study sought to address the following two research questions:
The purpose of this study is to be the first scientific investigation of the FCL curricular model enacted in a large university course setting, and to investigate the impact of the introduction of a KCI-inspired collaborative knowledge base. This design-based research (DBR) studied the efficacy of a complex pedagogical model in two iterations, situated in a lecture hall setting, populated in each iteration by ~235 undergraduate students in order to investigate the model's viability and to make recommendations as to improving its affordances for future research and application. Specifically, this study sought to address the following two research questions:
How can the FCL model be applied as a learning community approach within a large undergraduate course?
What are the limitations of the model, and what adaptations can help respond to those limitations?
The authors apologize for these error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
Statements
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Summary
Keywords
learning community, active learning, collaborative learning, inquiry learning, reciprocal teaching, lectures, knowledge community
Citation
Ehrlick SP and Slotta J (2018) Corrigendum: A Learning Community Approach for Post-secondary Large Lecture Courses. Front. Educ. 3:98. doi: 10.3389/feduc.2018.00098
Received
26 September 2018
Accepted
24 October 2018
Published
14 November 2018
Volume
3 - 2018
Edited and reviewed by
Rob Cassidy, Concordia University, Canada
Updates
Copyright
© 2018 Ehrlick and Slotta.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Steven P. Ehrlick sehrlick@ryerson.ca
This article was submitted to Digital Education, a section of the journal Frontiers in Education
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.