ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Sec. Bioenergy and Biofuels
Synthesis of Bio-Cellulose Acetate Membrane From Coconut Juice Residues for Carbon Dioxide Removal From Biogas in Membrane Unit
- 1Department of Chemical Engineering, Walailak University, Nakhon Si Thammarat, Thailand
- 2Biomass and Oil Palm Research Center of Excellence, Walailak University, Nakhon Si Thammarat, Thailand
The rapid growth of energy demand and consumption from fossil fuels has been of great concern since the last decade. Renewable energy, including biogas production from wastes, has been studied to ease up the energy crisis problems. This study aims to synthesize bio-cellulose acetate (CA) membranes from agricultural waste and to study its efficiency in the removal of CO2 from biogas. The bio-CA membranes were synthesized from acetylation of bacterial cellulose (BC) and obtained from coconut juice residues (CJRs). The results showed that both chemical and physical characteristics of the bio-CA membrane were compared with those of the chemical CA membranes. The CO2 removal capacity of the bio-CA membranes was tested in a membrane separation unit. The maximum CO2 selectivity of 29.53 was achieved when using the bio-CA membrane with a thickness of 0.05 mm under the feed pressure of 0.1 MPa. Thick CA membranes exhibited better CO2 selectivity performance, particularly at low operating pressure. However, the CO2/CH4 separation factor decreased in the high-pressure region, probably because of the plasticization of the gas components. Eco-efficiency was evaluated to determine the optimal process conditions. In terms of eco-efficiency, the results suggested that the optimal condition was a bio-CA membrane of 0.05-mm thickness and pressure of 0.1 MPa. The implication of this study is promoting a zero-waste environment in which the agricultural residues could be potentially used in the synthesis of high-value CA membranes for biogas purification applications in energy production.
Biogas has become a promising source of renewable energy in recent times, particularly in developing countries where plentiful amounts of agricultural-related raw materials can be utilized in biogas production. Typically, biogas can be generated from an anaerobic fermentation process of various feedstocks containing organic materials. Generally, the composition of biogas is CH4, CO2, and other gaseous compounds, such as H2S, N2, and humidity (Adebayo et al., 2015). However, biogas is usually pre-purified to remove impurities before use since those undesired components could potentially cause some inferior properties or damages in application processes. For example, CO2, which is present in a relatively large quantity in biogas, can lower the heat value of used biogas, which results in high transportation costs. For the removal of CO2 from biogas applications, membrane gas separation has become one of the emerging technologies over the traditional processes, such as pressure swing adsorption or cryogenic distillation (Moghadassi et al., 2014). The separation is mostly based on the sorption-diffusion mechanism of the gas components transporting through the dense membranes, in which there is a compromise between selectivity and permeability. A wide range of polymeric materials have reportedly been utilized and fabricated into membranes, such as polycarbonate (PC), polysulfone (PSF), polyimide (PI), ethyl acetate (EA), polyphenylene oxide, polydimethylsiloxane, and cellulose acetate (CA), suitable for CO2 removal applications (Cerveira et al., 2018). Unlike other polymers, the CA membrane can be alternatively prepared via bioprocesses that involve fewer uses of hazardous monomers and solvents in the preparation stage. Bio-CA can be synthesized from low-price bacterial cellulose (BC) obtained from the cultivation of various indirect carbon sources, including wastewater from agricultural industries and fruit juices (Phruksaphithak et al., 2019). Since there are plenty of inexpensive food source alternatives for the uncomplicated preparation of BC, therefore, these bio-CA materials could be economically attractive due to their low-cost production. The fabrication of the material into suitable forms of product that have well-suited properties for the implemented applications remains a challenge. Many studies reported the use of CA membranes in various forms for CO2 removal from various mixed gas systems, mostly in flat-sheet and spun hollow-fiber configurations (Chen et al., 2015; Sanaeepur et al., 2019). In general, pristine CA membranes exhibit inferior CO2 separation from the mixed gas. Therefore, modifications of the membranes were commonly incorporated to increase the separation efficiency. For example, a study by Pak et al. (2016) reported the use of the hollow fiber CA membrane for CO2/CH4 separation. A relatively high CO2 selectivity was achieved while maintaining a moderate permeability. Some additives, such as metal-organic frameworks (MOFs), which are capable of controlling the molecular sieving properties in gas separations, can be added to the membrane to improve the interaction between the membrane and the gas pairs that lead to superior separation performance. For instance, a study by Mubashir et al. (2020) found that NH2−MIL-53(Al) was successfully incorporated into the CA/polydimethylsiloxane-based hollow fiber membrane to increase the CO2/CH4 separation factor of the binary gas mixture. Also, reinforcement would increase the strength of the membrane so that the membrane could withstand high operating pressure. A study by Moghadassi et al. (2014) reported that multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) were blended with CA to form a composite CA membrane that could tolerate high feed, resulting in an improved permeability of the gas product. Besides the hollow-fiber type, flat sheet membranes could also be a competitive alternative since they require a simpler and more economical fabrication process. Mubashir et al. (2018a) suggested that flat-sheet CA membranes could be achieved by the solvent-casting technique using the N-methyl-1-2 pyrrolidone (NMP) as the fabricating solvent. The CO2 removal performance results of some of those related studies on various CA membrane systems are shown in Table 3.
As described earlier, conventional methods to prepare CA-based membranes involve the use of synthesized CA obtained from the chemical process, and the fabrication of the membrane itself would require the use of solvents and/or chemical additives. However, a bioprocess approach could be utilized to prepare the CA membrane. Khami et al. (2014) reported that the CA could be synthesized from a fermentation process of banana peels using Acetobacter xylinum. Many factors affect the properties of the obtained CA involved in the bioprocess using A. xylinum, including cultivating temperature, pH, cultivation duration, glucose quantity (% Brix), and also the type or source of the substrate (Khami et al., 2019). Several research studies have shown that both CA and bio-CA membranes are generally recognized as biodegradable materials (Rivard et al., 1992, Buchanan et al., 1993, Komarek et al., 1993, Gu et al., 1993, Gardner et al., 1994, Elfiana et al., 2018). The biodegradation rate of bio-CA made from nata de coco was 5–28% per day (Elfiana et al., 2018). Whereas, under the enrichment culture, the CA film was able to degrade, 67% weight loss, within 2–3 weeks (Buchanan et al., 1993).
Alternative carbon sources using fruit juices for the biosynthesis of BC propose high productivity and low cost (Phruksaphithak et al., 2019). Among them, coconut juice residues (CJR) are abundant, left from coconut postprocessing in Thailand, especially in the southern area. Hence, this study focuses on the biosynthesis and fabrication of bio-CA membranes from BC obtained from the cultivation process of CJR. The two-step process involves the preparation of the cultivated BC flat sheet and the following acetylation of the BC to obtain bio-CA membrane. The potential use of the synthesized membranes for CO2 removal from biogas application using membrane separation was studied in a binary CO2/CH4 gas mixed system. The CO2 removal capability of the membranes was measured in terms of the CO2 selectivity of the gas permeates. Finally, the concept of eco-efficiency was adapted as a tool to analyze the economic potential and the environmental impact of the proposed membrane separation process using bio-CA membranes to remove the CO2. This study would fulfill the gap of the utilization of bio-CA membrane in the gas separation process. Thus, the implication of this work could be beneficial to the growing development of biogas utilization in high-efficiency energy production.
Materials and Methods
Coconut juice residues, discarded after processing coconut milk, were obtained from a community market located in Thasala, Nakhon Si Thammarat, Thailand. Analytical grade of ammonium sulfate [(NH4)2SO4] with purity >99.99% was purchased from QRec (Thailand). Ethanol (99.8% purity) was supplied by Sigma Aldrich (Bangkok, Thailand). Granulated sugar was acquired from Mitr Phol Sugar Corp., Ltd. (Bangkok, Thailand). The acetic acid aqueous solution (5%v) was acquired from Nakornvitee Marketing Co., Ltd. (Wang Muang District, Thailand). The mixed gas of CO2/CH4 (40/60%v) was purchased from Linde (Thailand) Public Company Limited (Samut Prakan, Thailand).
CA Membrane Preparation
Acetobacter xylinum strains obtained from the Thailand Institute of Scientific and Technological Research (TISTR), Bangkok, Thailand was used for the biosynthesis of BC. This strain is widely used as it has the best yield of BC (Kongruang, 2008). Bacterium culture on Agar plates was prepared by transferring liquid culture aseptically into Petri plates, containing NA Agar medium, and incubated at 30°C for 3 days. The 3-day-old bacteria cells were inoculated into 25 ml of starter medium of hydrosulphite of sodium (HS) (Pa'e et al., 2011). The number of viable cells in the inoculum was determined by the pour plate technique with HS medium (Kongruang, 2008; Pa'e et al., 2011). Colonies were counted after 5 days of incubation at 30°C. The substrate for biosynthesis of BC was conducted by filtrating 1,000 ml of CJR using a filtration glass set (Rocker Model VF7cat.167200-07, Taiwan). The filtrated CJR was sterilized in an autoclave at 121°C for 15 min, and then, it was cooled down to room temperature. The sterilized CJR was added into a beaker containing 1 g of ammonium sulfate, 28 g of nutrient agar, and 100 g of glucose. The substrate mixture was stirred with the hotplate stirrer at 30°C until homogenization was obtained. Then, 5 mL of acetic acid and 100 mL of 40% by volume ethanol were added (Khami et al., 2019).
Acetobacter xylinum with the amount of 1 × 105 cfu/ml was added to 25 ml of the prepared substrate in the incubation plate with a diameter of 8 ± 0.3 cm. In this study, three dosages of A. xylinum were varied, 1 × 105, 1 × 106, 1 × 107 cfu/ml, to examine its effect on bio-CA production. The production of BC was accomplished under static culture in an incubator (Binder model BD115, Germany) at 40°C for 7 days (Pa'e et al., 2011, Lestari et al., 2014). During the cultivation period, the gelation of BC was formed. The degree of gelation of BC increased with time as the substrate medium was consumed. Various degrees of thickness of the prepared membranes was achieved by varying the amount of the initially used substrate of 20, 30, and 40 ml. The bio-CA membrane was fabricated from the cultivated BC through semi-acetylation. The acetylation process depends on the accessibility of cellulose fibers and the susceptibility of individual cellulose crystallites (Barud et al., 2008). After 7 days of cultivation, BC pellicle on the substrate surface was collected and soaked in distilled water at ambient temperature for 3 days. Bacterial cell debris was removed by boiling BC with 40 ml of 2% NaOH for 3 h at 60°C. After that, 40 ml of 40% ethanol was added, and BC was further boiled for another 3 h at the same temperature. Then, BC was dehydrated in an oven at 60°C for 3 h before blending into a mixture of 40 ml of acetic acid, 50 ml of toluene, and 0.2 ml of 60% perchloric acid. To remove any impurities and remaining reagents, BC was soaked in 40 ml of 75% ethanol for 2 h. BC was rinsed off by distilled water several times until the stinky odor was vanished and finally dried in a hot air oven model M100-800 (Memmert GmbH + Co. KG, Bangkok, Thailand) at 60°C for 8 h (Khami et al., 2019). The thickness values were randomly measured using a micrometer from 10 points covering the surface area of the whole membrane. Then, the average thickness of the bio-CA membranes was estimated; the results were confirmed by the measurement from the cross-sectional area using scanning electron microscope (SEM) analysis.
Effecting factors of BC production include pH, carbon source, % Brix, A. xylinum dosage, and temperature (Phruksaphithak et al., 2019). As suggested by previous studies in our research unit (Khami et al., 2014, 2019), the conditions for the cultivation of BC selected in this study included the following: pH (4–5), Brix (5–15%), and A. xylinum dosage (1 × 105-1 × 107 cell/ml). The set of experiments was designed using Box–Behnken design (BBD) in the response surface methodology (RSM) (Tafreshi et al., 2017). Yields of BC in terms of the conversion of CJR into BC (BC to CJR solution weight ratio) were calculated from the results of those experiments. The results from BC yield were then put into a response optimizer to determine the optimum conditions for the biosynthesis of BC.
Characterization of CA Membrane
The microstructure of the CA membrane from CJR was examined using an SEM (Model Merlin Compact, Carl Zeiss Co., Ltd., Bangkok, Thailand). The CA membrane was dried in a hot air oven (model FD115; Franz Binder GmbH & Co., Bangkok, Thailand) at 65°C for 6 h. Then, it was taken off from the oven and put in a desiccator (model RT-48C; Eureka Design Co., Ltd., Pathum Thani, Thailand) until it cooled to ambient temperature. The dried CA membrane was mounted on carbon stubs, sputter-coated with gold, and examined in a Jx A-840 SEM (Jeol, USA). The images from the SEM were analyzed with Microsun 2000/s image analysis software to obtain data on the nanostructure of the CA membrane. The magnification of the image analysis was 10,000× at 5 kV.
The tensile stress of the synthesized CA membranes with three different degrees of thickness was tested using a tensile stress machine (model DSS-10T; Shimadzu, Japan). The testing procedure followed ASTM D638 standard. CA membrane samples, with various degrees of thickness (0.03, 0.04, and 0.05 mm) and a width of 40 mm, were placed in the clamps. The tensile force was increased until the sample was torn, in which six replications were examined.
Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) Spectra Analysis
Attenuated total multiple reflection (ATR) Fourier Transform IR (FTIR) spectrometer (model Tensor 27; Bruker, Germany) was used to analyze functional groups of the chemical structure of the CA membrane. The analysis procedure followed the ATR-FTIR technique. The spectrum used in the study was in a wavelength range of 400–4,000 cm−1.
Thermo Gravimetric Analysis
Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA was conducted using Pyris1 TGA (Perkin Elmer, Ltd., Bangkok, Thailand). Change of the thermal property of dried CA membranes was estimated by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) (model DSC6000; Perkin Elmer, Ltd., Bangkok, Thailand). The analysis proceeded as instructed by the ASTM E1131, ISO 11358 standard. The weight of the sample used in the analysis was 1 g, and its surface was 1 cm × 1 cm. The TGA temperature was heated from 25 to 700°C at 10°C/min, while DSC temperature was heated from 30 to 440°C at 10°C/min. Three replications for each test were performed.
Membrane Separation Unit
To study the gas permeation of CO2 from the gas mixture using the synthesized CA membrane from CJR, the membrane separation unit, as displayed in Figure 1, was designed and constructed. The membrane separation unit was constructed from aluminum consisting of four layers. The plate at one end of the membrane unit was connected to the feed inlet and retentate outlet. The CA membrane was placed on a porous stainless-steel disc located between the feed and the permeate chamber. The permeate outlet was connected to the endplate of the permeate chamber side. Rubber O rings were used for gas leak prevention from each compartment.
From Figure 1, the gas mixture was fed to the top of the membrane separation unit through a regulator. The gas flow rate was measured and controlled using a rotameter. The separation of CO2 from the gas mixture was studied using the gas mixture of 40/60% CO2/CH4 under the following conditions: a pressure range of 0.05–0.30 MPa, temperature of 30°C, CA membrane thickness of 0.03 ± 0.005, 0.04 ± 0.005, and 0.05 ± 0.005 mm.
Gas permeability and gas selectivity of pure gas was calculated using Equations (1) and (2) (Basu et al., 2010) while gas permeability and gas selectivity of mixed gas were calculated using Equations (3) and (4):
where P : the gas permeability coefficient of component i
Q: feed flow rate (cm3/s)
l : the selective layer thickness of the membrane
A: the area of the membrane
P: the pressure difference across the membrane
Pperm: permeate pressure
Pfeed: feed pressure
The pure-gas selectivity (αa/b):
where αa/b: the selectivity (a/b)
Mixed-gas permeability of each component:
where Pi: the gas-mixed permeability coefficient of component i
xperm, i: mole fraction of component i in the permeate stream
xfeed, i: mole fraction of component i in the feed stream
Eco-efficiency is an inclusive indicator for performance measurement of product, process, and service (PPS) system in terms of environmental impact and resource use and economic development (Liu et al., 2020). It is an effective tool for sustainable development that follows the ISO14045 standard (Environmental management: Eco-efficiency assessment of product systems) (Changwichan et al., 2018). In general, eco-efficiency was obtained from the ratio of product or service value to the environmental impact such as the consumption of energy, materials, and water or generated greenhouse gas emissions and carbon dioxide emissions. The concept equation of eco-efficiency can be calculated as Equation (5) (Heilala et al., 2014).
In this study, to apply the concept of sustainability and eco-efficiency indicators, the eco-efficiency Equation (6) was modified. The value of PPS was represented by CO2 selectivity. The operating cost of the membrane unit was calculated from the cost of the gas mixture used in the performing experiment. The total operating cost of bio-CA membrane produced by A. xylinum including chemicals used and electricity was calculated using with following equation.
where Ed: CO2 selectivity
Ec: Cost of bio-CA membrane production and operating of the membrane unit.
Result and Discussion
Biosynthesis of BC From CJR and Its Optimum Conditions for the Cultivation
The optimum cultivation conditions were determined using the Surface optimizer. Figure 2 illustrates that, within the ranges of studied parameters, the optimum conditions of BC production were 14.9% Brix, 1 × 107 cfu/ml of A. xylinum, and pH of 4. Thus, these conditions were controlled in the cultivation of BC from CJR. A. xylinum used CJR as the carbon source in the production of BC. The carbon source of CJR used in the study was 6,000–12,000 mg/l. The high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis of the remaining substrate found the highest concentration of sucrose, glucose, fructose, lactic acid, and acetic acid at 4.99, 7,62, 14.04, 1.38, and 0.38 g/L, respectively. Throughout cultivation, pH gradually decreased with the production of lactic acid and acetic acid by A. xylinum. Therefore, pH that is suitable for BC cultivation should not be <4.
Figure 2. Optimum conditions for bacterial cellulose (BC) cultivation from coconut juice residues (CJRs) by Acetobacter xylinum.
The bio-CA membranes, as shown in Figure 3, were fabricated through the acetylation from BC with the thickness of 0.03 ± 0.005, 0.04 ± 0.005, and 0.05 ± 0.005 mm. Dry weights of the CA-0.03, CA-0.04, and CA-0.05 membranes were ~0.11, 0.28, and 0.42 g, respectively.
Morphological and Structural Analysis of CA Membrane
The bio-CA membranes were obtained from the cultivation process, described earlier. In general, the thin solid membranes were flat sheet-like with some degree of roughness on the surface, as shown in Figure 3. Figure 4 shows the SEM results of the normal and cross-sectional surfaces of the bio-CA membranes with three different degrees of thickness (0.03, 0.04, and 0.05 mm). As shown in Figures 4A,C,E, the normal surface of the membranes generally featured a rough fibrous texture packed with dense randomly entangled cellulose fibers. Meanwhile, the cross-sectional results (Figures 4B,D,F) revealed a multi-stack-like structure, composing of multiple thin layers of the CA fibrous sheets overlayed and stacked up together throughout the thickness of the membranes. Variation in morphological features (e.g., density and void distribution) of the membrane was observed. This stemmed from the difference in undertaking nature in the formation of BC during the cultivation stage, resulting in the asymmetric morphology of the membrane.
Figure 4. SEM results of the CA membrane samples with various average thickness values of (A) CA-0.03, (B) CA-0.03 (cross-section), (C) CA-0.04, (D) CA-004 (cross-section), (E) CA-0.05, and (F) CA-005 (cross-section) at 10,000× magnifications, 5 kV.
The CA membrane was an organic hydrocarbon compound consisting CHO elements. Figure 5 illustrates the energy dispersive x-ray (EDX) results of the CA membranes. The element analysis revealed that the samples consisted mainly of carbon (C) and oxygen (O) with good dispersion of the components throughout the membranes. Table 1 summarizes the carbon (C) and oxygen (O) compositions of the prepared samples.
Figure 5. EDX carbon (C) and oxygen (O) elemental mapping results of the CA membrane samples with various values of average thickness (A) CA-0.03 (thickness = 0.03 mm), (B) CA-0.04 (thickness = 0.04 mm), and (C) CA-0.05 (thickness = 0.05 mm) at 10,000× magnifications, 5 Kv.
Chemical Structure Analysis by FTIR
The chemical structure of the prepared membranes composed mainly of the CA was revealed in the FTIR results, as shown in Figure 6. The FTIR spectra of the sample showed peaks corresponding to the common functional groups similar to those of the CA. The presence of the peak associated with the C=O stretching of the hemicellulose at the wavelength of 1,543 cm−1 was observed, altogether with the O–H stretching peak at 3,341 the C–O–C vibration at 1,160 cm−1, and the C<H2 vibration at 1,427 cm−1 of the cellulose structure, and the C=C stretching in the aromatic structure at 1,543 The FTIR result was in good agreement with the characteristic peaks observed in a study by Khami et al. (2019), in which the CA material was synthesized by acetylation of BC. The magnitude of transmittance in the related spectra could be different depending on the degree of substitution of the acetyl group on the cellulose main chains.
Thermal and Mechanical Properties of the CA Membrane
Figure 7 shows the TGA result of the CA membrane. The decomposition temperature of the material was found to be around 350°C. From room temperature to about 300°C, the TGA curve was slightly declined and almost in the plateau region, suggesting that the membrane was relatively thermally stable. This suggests the applicable range of the service temperature of the gas separation using the prepared membrane. The prepared membrane possessed similar thermal stability characteristics when compared with the CA membrane synthesized by the chemical route.
Figure 7. The result of thermogravimetry analysis of the CA membrane at a heating rate of 10°C/min under a N2 atmosphere.
Tensile Strength of the CA Membrane
Figure 8 shows the tensile properties of the membrane samples. The average tensile strength of the membranes was in the range of 95–131 MPa. At room temperature, the membranes exhibited semi-ductile-like material characteristics under tensile. At a strain rate of 5 mm/min, the average elongation at break of the samples was ~15–17%. For the CA-0.03 membrane (0.03 mm thick), the sample showed the highest stress value of about 131 MPa. Under tensile force, the induced orientation of the CA fibers could undergo to some extent, which seemed to be more pronounced in the thicker samples (i.e., 0.04 and 0.05 mm). With a larger thickness, the laminated thin layers of the fibrous CA probably slipped from each other under shear stress, resulting in decreased strength of the sample. Without reinforcement, the tensile strength of the pristine flat-sheet membranes prepared by the proposed bioprocess in this study is relatively higher, when compared with the neat membranes synthesized via the solvent casting of the CA solution (Pak et al., 2016).
CO2 Separation Performance of the Membrane From a Binary CO2/CH4 Mixed Gas
The CO2 removal capacity of the CA membranes with three degrees of thickness of 0.03 mm (CA-0.03), 0.04 mm (CA-0.04), and 0.05 mm (CA-0.05) was tested in the gas separation unit, as described earlier. The binary mixed gas containing a fixed CO2/CH4 ratio (40%v CO2) was fed into the membrane unit having the CA membrane as the separating barrier at a feed pressure ranging from 0.05 to 0.3 MPa. The CH4 and CO2 compositions of the permeate and the retentate were obtained from GC results. The transport of the gas components in terms of permeability and selectivity were calculated from the gas concentrations. The gas permeation results are summarized in Table 2.
For the binary gas mixture, both CO2 and CH4 competitively permeated under the pressure difference across the thickness of the asymmetric bio-CA membrane. Figure 9 shows the effect of feed pressure on CO2 permeability of the gas permeate passing through the membranes with various thickness values (0.03, 0.04, and 0.05 mm). With the increasing pressure of the feed, the CO2 permeability decreased until the pressure reached around 0.2 MPa at which the curve began to climb up. Figure 10 illustrates the effect of feed pressure on the CH4 permeability of the gas permeate passing through the membranes with various thickness values (0.03, 0.04, and 0.05 mm). The CH4 permeability tended to increase with the increasing feed pressure, particularly in a high-pressure region. The transport of both CO2 and CH4 through the dense solid CA membranes could be explained by the solution-diffusion mechanism, in which CO2 has better solubility within the matrix relative compared to CH4 (Ismail and Lorna, 2002). CO2 has a greater affinity toward the CA matrix due to the polar–polar interaction between the CO2 molecules and the acetyl/hydroxyl groups on the CA backbones. Whereas, CH4 essentially exhibits no chemical association within the CA membrane due to its non-polar nature, and therefore, it can only be purely transported by the physical mechanism, which is limited by its low solubility on the highly polar sites in the membranes. With the incremental feed pressure, increasing the partial pressure of the CO2 would result in higher CO2 concentration within the CA matrix. As demonstrated in Figure 9, however, the CO2 permeability decreased when the feed pressure increased from 0.05 to about 0.2 MPa. This could be explained by the membrane by the carrier saturation of the active sites within the CA membrane when all available carboxyl/hydroxyl pendant groups were associated with the chemical interactions with highly polar CO2 molecules. (Zou and Winston Ho, 2006). Therefore, increasing the CO2 partial pressure would not further increase the CO2 flux since all the carriers have already reacted with CO2 and attained the maximum capacities. As a result, the CO2 permeability would drop. On the other hand, the transporting CH4 did not have any chemical association with carriers. Thus, its sorption behavior could be explained by Henry's law in which the CH4 flux linearly increased with the feed pressure, as shown in Figure 10.
Figure 9. Effect of feed pressure on CO2 permeability (Barrer) of the permeate transported through the CA membrane with thickness values of 0.03 mm (CA-0.03), 0.04 mm (CA-0.04), and 0.05 mm (CA-0.05) at room temperature (30°C).
Figure 10. Effect of feed pressure on CH4 permeability (Barrer) of the permeate transported through the CA membrane with thickness values of 0.03 mm (CA-0.03), 0.04 mm (CA-0.04), and 0.05 mm (CA-0.05) at room temperature (30°C).
The CO2/CH4 separation performance of the membrane was measured in terms of the CO2 selectivity of the gas permeate. Figure 11 depicts the effect of operating feed pressure on the CO2 selectivity (CO2/CH4 permeability ratio) of the CA membranes having different thicknesses of 0.03, 0.04, and 0.05 mm. The CO2 selectivity drastically declined to approach very low values as the feed pressure increased. This phenomenon could be due to the plasticization effects induced by a high concentration of the sorbed CO2 within the asymmetric CA membrane (Houde et al., 1996; Cerveira et al., 2018). The high solubility of CO2 may potentially swell the CA polymer to such an extent that the intermolecular interactions were disrupted, which led to the enlargement of the free volume captivities (Puleo et al., 1989; Chang et al., 2019). Consequently, the transport rate of the penetrant CO2 and CH4 were enhanced. From SEM results, the membrane typically inherited a multi-layered flat-sheet structure with a little degree of presented voids within the matrix. These void characteristics could also affect the transport properties, such as the surface sorption–desorption behaviors, of the permeances transporting through the membrane. As discussed earlier, the structure of the obtained thick membranes generally featured well-packed layers with less presence of interlayer voids. In a low-pressure region where the plasticization had not yet been taken, high CO2 selectivity was achieved when using a thick membrane (i.e., CA-0.05), which exhibited a well-packed structure with fewer interlayer voids. From the graph, the plasticization pressure of the CA membranes for the separation of the CO2/CH4 gas mixture was observed to occur at 0.1 MPa for CA-0.03, 0.15 MPa for CA-0.04, and 0.2 MPa for CA-0.05, respectively. A maximum CO2/CH4 selectivity value of 29.53 was achieved in the separation system containing the CA-0.05 membrane operating at a feed pressure of 0.10 MPa. The CO2 selectivity of this study was in good agreement when compared with other related studies. Table 3 summarizes the CO2/CH4 selectivity results in comparison with related studies on various CA membranes for CO2/CH4 systems. The CO2 selectivity value of the bio-CA membrane was also plotted among the CO2/CH4 selectivity results obtained from the related studies in comparison to the Robeson upper bound relationship (Robeson, 2008), as shown in Figure 12. From the graph, the best result of the CO2/CH4 selectivity value of 29.53 locates under, but relatively close to, the Robeson upper bounds compared with the reported results obtained from other studies utilizing flat CA membrane systems (see Table 3). As discussed earlier, the flat-sheet bio-CA membranes prepared from environmental-friendly procedures proposed in this study have shown promising CO2 removal capability for biogas treatment applications. However, an improvement on the membrane properties could be further explored to enhance its separation performance in the direction of surpassing the upper bound curve toward the commercially desirable region.
Figure 11. Effect of feed pressure on the CO2/CH4 selectivity of permeability (Barrer) of the permeate transported through the CA membrane with thickness values of 0.03 mm (CA-0.03), 0.04 mm (CA-0.04), and 0.05 mm (CA-0.05) at room temperature (30°C).
Figure 12. CO2/CH4 gas separation performance of various CA membranes in comparison to the Robeson upper bound.
The total production cost of bio-CA membrane made from CJR in this study was roughly calculated as follows: The total production cost of 40 bio-CA membranes with a total area of 8,039 cm2 was 357.62 Baht. Thus, the lab-scale production cost of bio-CA membrane from CJR in this study was ~0.044 Baht/cm2. However, the cost of these in-house membranes was still relatively high, compared with the commercial CA membranes which have an estimated price in the range of 0.001–0.008 Baht/cm2 (Alibaba.com, 2021). The operating cost of the membrane separation testing in this study, estimated from the gas mixture used in each experiment, was 5.10 Baht/L. The eco-efficiencies of the CO2 separation for three different degrees of thickness of bio-CA membranes, as calculated by Equation (6), are displayed in Figure 13. The results indicate that the eco-efficiency was drastically dependent on the pressure of the gas mixture fed into the separation unit. Moreover, the thickness of the CA membrane affected the eco-efficiency as well, in which the thicker the CA membrane, the higher the eco-efficiency. The cost for preparing the CA membranes with various thicknesses is not significantly different. While the thicker membranes could deliver higher CO2 separation performance than the thinner ones, the thicker membranes are more economically attractive for potential CO2 removal applications. it can be concluded from the results that the bio-CA-0.05 membrane was the most appropriate one to be applied in the membrane separation unit at the air inlet pressure of 0.05 MPa.
Figure 13. Modified eco-efficiency of CO2/CH4 selectivity of the gas separation unit with the CA membranes: (A) CA-0.03; (B) CA-0.04; and (C) CA-0.05.
An eco-friendly approach to synthesize the bio-CA membrane from the cultivation of coconut water residues, potentially used for the removal of CO2 from biogas, was successfully developed. The membranes exhibited the ability to selectively separate CO2 from the binary CO2/CH4 mixed gas. The CO2 removal capability of the bio-CA membranes in terms of the selectivity was relatively good for the neat or pristine CA membranes in which the highest CO2 selectivity value of 29.53 was achieved. The performance to cost ratio of the CO2 separation was evaluated in terms of the eco-efficiency of the process. The modified eco-efficiency analysis suggested that the CO2 gas separation process using thick membranes operating at low-pressure conditions would yield higher eco-efficiency values. Using CJR as a carbon source for bio-CA membrane not only adds value to waste but also reduces environmental pollution. This study is also one of the initiatives taken in an effort to enhance the quality of biogas suitable for a wider range of applications, particularly in southern Thailand where local biogas production facilities are drastically increasing in the last few years.
Data Availability Statement
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.
AK and WD were leading researchers of the project, conceived the presented idea, supervised the findings and analysis, and prepared manuscript. SW performed the laboratory experiments and assisted in the image preparation of the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
We would like to acknowledge the financial support from Walailak University through the WU62204 research grant.
Adebayo, A., Jekayinfa, S., and Linke, B. (2015). Effects of organic loading rate on biogas yield in a continuously stirred tank reactor experiment at mesophilic temperature. Curr. J. Appl. Sci. Technol. 11, 1–9. doi: 10.9734/BJAST/2015/18040
Alibaba.com (2021, April 7). Perfect Cellulose Acetate Membrane for Pure Quality Water. Retrieved from: https://www.alibaba.com/showroom/cellulose-acetate-membrane.htmL
Barud, H. S., Araújo Júnior, A. M., Santos, D. B., Assunção, R. M. N., Meireles, C. S., Cerqueira, D. A., et al. (2008). Thermal behavior of cellulose acetate produced from homogeneous acetylation of bacterial cellulose. Thermochimica Acta 47, 61–69. doi: 10.1016/j.tca.2008.02.009
Cerveira, G. S., Borges, C. P., and de Kronemberger, F. A. (2018). Gas permeation applied to biogas upgrading using cellulose acetate and polydimethylsiloxane membranes. J. Cleaner Product. 187, 830–838. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.008
Chang, M., Deng, L., Xiang, D., Cao, B., Hosseini, S. S., and Li, P. (2019). Approaches to suppress CO2-induced plasticization of polyimide membranes in gas separation applications. Processes. 7:51. doi: 10.3390/pr7010051
Elfiana, T. N., Fitria, A. N. I., Sedyadi, E., Prabawati, S. Y., and Nugraha, I. (2018). Degradation study of biodegradable plastic using nata de coco as a filler. Biol. Med. Natur. Product Chem. 7, 33–38. doi: 10.14421/biomedich.2018.72.33-38
Gu, J.-D., Eberiel, D. T., McCarthy, S. P., and Gross, R. A. (1993). Cellulose acetate biodegradability upon exposure to simulated aerobic composting and anaerobic bioreactor environments. J. Environ. Polym Degr. 1, 143–153. 10.1007%252FBF01418207
Heilala, J., Ruusu, R., Montonen, J., Vatanen, S., Kavka, C., Asnicar, F., et al. (2014). “Eco-process engineering system for collaborative product process system optimisation,” in Advances in Production Management Systems. Innovative and Knowledge-Based Production Management in a Global-Local World, Vol 439, eds B. Grabot, B. Vallespir, S. Gomes, A. Bouras, & D. Kiritsis (Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg), 634–641. doi: 10.1007/978-3-662-44736-9_77
Houde, A., Krishnakumar, B., Charati, S., and Stern, S. (1996). Permeability of dense (homogeneous) cellulose acetate membranes to methane, carbon dioxide, and their mixtures at elevated pressures. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 62, 2181–2192. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19961226)62:13<2181::AID-APP1>3.0.CO;2-F
Jami'An, W. N. R., Hasbullah, H., Mohamed, F., Yusof, N., Ibrahim, N., and Ali, R. R. (2016). Effect of evaporation time on cellulose acetate membrane for gas separation. IOP Confer. Series Earth Environ. Sci. 36:8. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/36/1/012008
Khami, S., Khamwichit, W., and Suwannahong, K. (2019). Synthesis of cellulose acetate nanofiber (CANF) from bacterial cellulose (BC) incubated from cannery seafood wastewater (CSW) using acetobacter xylinum. ARPN J. Eng. Appl. Sci. 14, 3038–3045. Retrieved from: http://www.arpnjournals.org/jeas/research_papers/rp_2019/jeas_0919_7904.pdf
Khami, S., Khamwichit, W., Suwannahong, K., and Sanongraj, W. (2014). Characteristics of bacterial cellulose production from agricultural wastes. Adv. Mater. Res. 931–932, 693–697. doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.931-932.693
Komarek, R. J., Gardner, R. M., Buchanan, C. M., and Gedon, S. (1993). Biodegradation of radiolabeled cellulose acetate and cellulose propionate. J. Appl. Polym Sci. 50, 1739–1746. doi: 10.1002/app.1993.070501009
Lestari, P., Elfrida, N., Suryani, A., and Suryadi, Y. (2014). Study on the production of bacterial cellulose from Acetobacter xylinum using agro-waste. Jordan J. Biol. Sci. 7, 75–80. doi: 10.12816/0008218
Liu, H., Yang, R., Zhou, Z., and Huang, D. (2020). Regional green eco-efficiency in china: considering energy saving, pollution treatment, and external environmental heterogeneity. Sustainability (Switzerland) 12:7059. doi: 10.3390/su12177059
Moghadassi, A. R., Rajabi, Z., Hosseini, S. M., and Mohammadi, M. (2014). Fabrication and modification of cellulose acetate-based mixed matrix membrane: gas separation and physical properties. J. Industr. Eng. Chem. 20, 1050–1060. doi: 10.1016/j.jiec.2013.06.042
Mubashir, M., Fong, Y. Y., Leng, C. T., and Keong, L. K. (2018a). Enhanced gases separation of cellulose acetate membrane using n-methyl-1-2 pyrrolidone as fabrication solvent. Int. J. Autom. Mech. Eng. 15, 4978–4986. doi: 10.15282/ijame.15.1.2018.7.0386
Mubashir, M., Fong, Y. Y., Leng, C. T., Keong, L. K., and Jusoh, N. (2020). Study on the effect of process parameters on CO2/CH4 binary gas separation performance over NH2-MIL-53(Al)/cellulose acetate hollow fiber mixed matrix membrane. Polymer Testing 81:106223. doi: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2019.106223
Mubashir, M., Yeong, Y. F., Lau, K. K., and Chew, T. L. (2019). Effect of spinning conditions on the fabrication of cellulose acetate hollow fiber membrane for CO2 separation from N2 and CH4. Polymer Testing. 73, 1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.10.036
Mubashir, M., Yeong, Y. F., Lau, K. K., Chew, T. L., and Norwahyu, J. (2018b). Efficient CO2/N2 and CO2/CH4 separation using NH2-MIL-53(Al)/cellulose acetate (CA) mixed matrix membranes. Separat. Purif. Techn. 199, 140–151. doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2018.01.038
Pa'e, N., Zahan, K. A., and Muhamad, I. I. (2011). Production of biopolymer from Acetobacter xylinum using different fermentation methods. Int. J. Eng. Technol. 11, 74–79. Retrieved from: http://ijens.org/Vol_11_I_05/116901-05-3434-IJET-IJENS.pdf
Puleo, A. C., Paul, D. R., and Kelley, S. S. (1989). The effect of degree of acetylation on gas sorption and transport behavior in cellulose acetate. J. Membr. Sci. 47, 301–332. doi: 10.1016/S0376-7388(00)83083-5
Rivard, C. J., Adney, W. S., Himmel, M. E., Mitchell, D. J., Vinzant, T. B., Grohmann, K., et al. (1992). Effects of natural polymer acetylation on the anaerobic bioconversion to methane and carbon dioxide. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 34–35, 725–736. doi: 10.1007/BF02920592
Tafreshi, N., Sharifnia, S., and Moradi Dehaghi, S. (2017). Box–Behnken experimental design for optimization of ammonia photocatalytic degradation by ZnO/Oak charcoal composite. Process Safet. Environ. Protect. 106, 203–210. doi: 10.1016/j.psep.2017.01.015
Keywords: cellulose acetate membrane, biopolymer, CO2 removal, biogas separation, agricultural waste utilization
Citation: Khamwichit A, Wattanasit S and Dechapanya W (2021) Synthesis of Bio-Cellulose Acetate Membrane From Coconut Juice Residues for Carbon Dioxide Removal From Biogas in Membrane Unit. Front. Energy Res. 9:670904. doi: 10.3389/fenrg.2021.670904
Received: 22 February 2021; Accepted: 14 April 2021;
Published: 14 May 2021.
Edited by:Nidia S. Caetano, Instituto Superior de Engenharia Do Porto (ISEP), Portugal
Reviewed by:Obulisamy Parthiba Karthikeyan, University of Houston, United States
Asim Laeeq Khan, COMSATS University Islamabad, Lahore Campus, Pakistan
Copyright © 2021 Khamwichit, Wattanasit and Dechapanya. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.