Editorial: Herbarium Collection-Based Plant Evolutionary Genetics and Genomics
Freek T. Bakker
Vanessa C. Bieker
Michael D. Martin- 1Biosystematics Group, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, Netherlands
- 2Department of Natural History, NTNU University Museum, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway
Editorial on the Research Topic
Herbarium Collection-Based Plant Evolutionary Genetics and Genomics
Out of the Box: Herbarium Collections as Research Tools
Over the past centuries and especially the last decades, herbarium collections world-wide have amassed an estimated 350 million specimens of plants and fungi, deposited in 3,400 herbaria world-wide (Soltis, 2017). Many of these specimens comprise yet-undescribed species, estimated to be around 70,000 (Bebber et al., 2010), and therefore represent a potentially highly significant contribution to taxonomy and systematics.
These collections are a huge repository of botanical metadata, not only at the level of the specimen itself—with its associated collection locality, population, and associated pathogen data (Yoshida et al., 2015; James et al., 2018)—but also at the level of characters and traits such as leaf morphology (Queenborough, 2017), gene (Bieker and Martin, 2018), and genome (GGBN; Seberg et al., 2016). Analyzing this metadata permits us to look back—and perhaps even forward—in time, testing historical biological hypotheses, identifying extinct genotypes, as well as modeling past ecological processes or extrapolating future trends. Especially for plants with long generation times, it is often not feasible to observe genetic changes over many generations in greenhouse experiments. As time series for many plant species can be amassed from global herbaria, these collections facilitate studying plants in more detail, for example to estimate mutation rates after introduction to a novel range (Exposito-Alonso et al., 2018). In fact, collectively, herbarium collections can be seen as being part of a Global Museum in which new questions can be addressed using novel combinations of disciplines that so far may not typically interact (Bakker et al., 2020), and in which digitisation of herbarium collections plays an important role (Soltis, 2017).
Herbarium DNA
Over the past three decades, a considerable body of literature has accumulated concerning herbarium DNA, mostly focusing on its properties and post-mortem damage (e.g., Savolainen et al., 1995; Staats et al., 2011, 2013; Weiss et al., 2016) and its potential utility for biological inference (e.g., Erkens et al., 2008; Drábková et al., 2002; Telle and Thines, 2008; Särkinen et al., 2012; Bakker et al., 2016; Gutaker et al., 2017; Brewer et al., 2019). The overarching conclusion has been that plant archival DNA is remarkably well-preserved, in spite of the heat often applied to the specimens during collection and preservation. In contrast with animal tissues, the cell wall in plant (and fungal) material probably provides good protection against DNA damage caused by oxidative stress (Mateiu and Rannala, 2008; Roldán-Arjona and Ariza, 2009).
Plant nuclear genomes are generally much larger than animal and fungal genomes (Gregory et al., 2007) and are characterized by abundant repeats, which can hamper the assembly of genome sequences. But provided an existing reference genome sequence exists, whole-genome studies including herbarium specimens are possible. For example, Exposito-Alonso et al., 2018 re-sequenced the nuclear genomes of 36 Arabidopsis thaliana herbarium specimens collected between 1863 and 1993. As the number of available reference genomes rapidly increases, in part through initiatives such as the Earth BioGenome Project (Lewin et al., 2018), this approach becomes available even for non-model plant species.
Plastomes, with their structural conservation across land plants (Wicke and Schneeweiss, 2015), modest length around 160 kbp, and high copy number in the cell, have proven to be feasible targets for herbarium DNA studies, especially through the application of “genome skimming” (Straub et al., 2012; Bakker, 2017). Remarkable examples of plastome sequencing from herbarium DNA include now-extinct species, as in, for instance, the de-novo assembly of the complete (Zedane et al., 2015) and mitogenome (Van de Paer et al., 2018) from a 140-year-old specimen of Hesperelaea (Oleacea), the reference-guided assembly of the plastome from a 167-year old specimen of Leptagrostis schimperiana (Arundinoideae, Poaceae) to resolve its taxonomic position (Hardion et al., 2020), as well as the reconstruction of the complete plastome from the now-extinct, endemic Hawaiian mint Stenogyne haliakalae (Welch et al., 2016). Due to their influence on crop production and their development of herbicide resistance, weeds are also of general interest. As an example, here Sablok et al. contribute the reconstructed plastome sequence of Ambrosia trifida (Asteraceae) from a herbarium specimen collected in 1886, and investigate the plant's resistance to the widely used herbicide glyphosate.
Ancient Alleles
Herbarium specimens contain not only DNA from the specimen itself, but also from associated microbes and pathogens that can be exploited for evolutionary and ecological inference (Bieker et al., 2020). Indeed, examples in which herbarium DNA contributed to evolutionary genetic inference have focused on historical pathogens (Martin et al., 2013; Yoshida et al., 2014, 2015), determining the genotype of the oomycete plant pathogen Phytophthora infestans that caused the nineteenth-century Irish potato famine. Ristaino summarizes emerging patterns in global Phytophthora distribution and how mycological and plant herbaria have played an important role in reconstructing pathways of plant pathogen movement. Ancient alleles in Alopecurus myosuroides Huds., relevant to herbicide resistance but pre-dating human influence, were detected from herbarium DNA by Délye et al. (2013). Likewise, Besnard et al. (2014), using DNA from a 100-year-old Madagascan herbarium specimen, reconstructed the shift in underlying genetics from C3 to C4 in grass photosynthesis. These examples demonstrate that we are currently at the dawn of an era of historical herbarium genomics (Buerki and Baker, 2015; Bieker and Martin, 2018), and it is likely that a large body of plant archival genomic data will be generated in the years to come.
That clade- or phylum-specific challenges remain in sequencing herbarium DNA is illustrated by Forin et al., who describes the case of the Saccardo mycological herbarium and how ribosomal DNA sequencing of 100-year old fungal specimens was feasible. Forin et al. point out the potential of mycological herbarium genomics, as only an estimated 1% of total known fungal species currently have associated DNA sequences in public databases.
DNA Barcoding and Metabarcoding
DNA barcoding is a commonly used method for species identification and phylogenetic analysis. It relies on the amplification of short, conserved genomic loci that show enough variation to separate species but have low intraspecific variation. Due to the high levels of DNA fragmentation (Weiss et al., 2016), it is challenging to obtain barcode sequencing for herbarium specimens (Prosser et al., 2016). Kistenich et al. explore DNA sequencing of a ca. 900-bp portion of the long mitochondrial ribosomal small subunit (mtSSU) from historical lichen specimens using a two-step PCR approach followed by Ion Torrent sequencing. Their approach demonstrated a high success rate compared to traditional Sanger sequencing, providing enough sequencing information for species identification even in a 150-year old specimen. Moreover, no significant correlation between sequencing success and habitat ecology of the investigated specimens was found, which provides confidence for future lichen herbarium sequencing projects. These and other methodological advancements suggest that barcode information can also be more easily retrieved from herbarium and fungarium type specimens, which are often more than 100 years old.
Barcoding studies, and especially those employing metabarcoding, rely heavily on the completeness of databases for species identification. In order to complete the databases, which currently only contain an estimated 20% of described land plants (Wilkinson et al., 2017), herbarium collections offer a valuable and largely untapped resource. Focusing on Australian plant biodiversity, Dormontt et al. make a strong case for how herbarium collections should be systematically analyzed to capitalize on their scientific potential, and that the curation of specimen reference data is paramount in this.
Genomic Sequencing and Other Data From Herbarium DNA
The increasingly common retrieval of genome-wide SNP data from herbarium DNA presents an enormous potential for future phylogenetic, population genomic, and molecular-based ecological studies that include these valuable specimens. For instance, genotyping by sequencing (GBS) of Solidago species from relatively young herbarium specimens collected between 1970 and 2010 was successful in 98% of samples (Beck and Semple, 2015). More recently, Lang et al. (2020) described a very promising reduced-representation sequencing method designed for hybridization-capture of ddRAD loci from historical plant specimens, demonstrating its utility on Arabidopsis thaliana and Cardamine bulbifera. At a lower-throughput genomic scale, targeted enrichment approaches aim to obtain sequence data for hundreds of nuclear-encoded loci from herbarium samples (Hart et al., 2016; Brewer et al., 2019; Viruel et al., 2019). Forrest et al. test the limits of the Hyb-Seq approach for sequencing herbarium specimens, especially with regards to historic and contemporary techniques of specimen preservation. They show that although data could also be obtained from poor quality samples, preservation methods like heat and alcohol treatment yielded greater DNA degradation and poorer DNA retrieval. Finally, Dodsworth et al. explore the angiosperm non-coding genome, showing that herbarium DNA is virtually indistinguishable from fresh DNA in analyses of nuclear genomic repeat clusters and their abundancies. Thus, they argue that herbarium collections can facilitate further genomic exploration of the repetitive content of plant genomes, which yields additional (nuclear) phylogenetic markers useful at the (sub)species-level (see also Dodsworth et al., 2015).
Scaling-Up the Use of Collections
This topic has collected a variety of outstanding recent successes in genetic analysis of herbarium specimens, inspiring our prediction of the great potential of these approaches for evolutionary genomic, population genetic, phylogenetic, and biosystematic discovery in archival plants and their associated microbial communities. For instance, future studies of the evolution of photosynthesis, or the evolutionary ecology of adaptive and functional traits, will undoubtedly benefit from the extensive samples offered by herbarium collections. We posit that we are at the dawn of an era of herbarium genomics in which, augmenting traditional phylogenetic studies that have become the standard for herbarium collection-based genetic work, soon will come a flood of ecological and evolutionary investigations utilizing large quantities of genomic and genetic data gleaned directly from voucher specimens.
Author Contributions
MM conceived of the Research Topic. FB drafted the editorial with significant contributions from VB and MM. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Acknowledgments
We thank the many authors who contributed their manuscripts on this research topic. Funding was provided by Norwegian Research Council Young Research Talents grant 287327 to MM.
References
Bakker, F. T. (2017). Herbarium genomics: skimming and plastomics from archival specimens. Webbia J. Plant Taxon. Geogr. 72, 35–45. doi: 10.1080/00837792.2017.1313383
Bakker, F. T., Antonelli, A., Clarke, J. A., Cook, J. A., Edwards, S. V., Ericson, P. G. P., et al. (2020). The Global Museum: natural history collections and the future of evolutionary science and public education. PeerJ. 8:e8225. doi: 10.7717/peerj.8225
Bakker, F. T., Lei, D., Yu, J., Mohammadin, S., Wei, Z., Van de Kerke, S., et al. (2016). Herbarium genomics: plastome sequence assembly from a range of herbarium specimens using an terative organelle genome assembly (IOGA) pipeline. Biol. J. Linnean Soc. 117:33–43. doi: 10.1111/bij.12642
Bebber, D. P., Carine, M. A., Wood, J. R. I., Wortley, A. H., Harris, D. J., Prance, G. T., et al. (2010). Herbaria are a major frontier for species discovery. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107, 22169–22171. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1011841108
Beck, J. B., and Semple, J. C. (2015). Next-generation sampling: pairing genomics with herbarium specimens provides species-level signal in Solidago (Asteraceae). Appl. Plant Sci. 3:1500014. doi: 10.3732/apps.1500014
Besnard, G., Christin, P.-A., Malé, P.-J. G., L'Huillier, E., Lauzeral, C., Coissac, E., et al. (2014). From museums to genomics: old herbarium specimens shed light on a C3 to C4 transition. J. Exp. Bot. 65, 6711–621. doi: 10.1093/jxb/eru395
Bieker, V. C., and Martin, M. D. (2018). Implications and future prospects for evolutionary analyses of DNA in historical herbarium collections. Bot. Lett. 165, 409–418. doi: 10.1080/23818107.2018.1458651
Bieker, V. C., Sánchez Barreiro, F., Rasmussen, J. A., Brunier, M., Wales, N., and Martin, M. D. (2020). Metagenomic analysis of historical herbarium specimens reveals a postmortem microbial community. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 20, 1206–1219. doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.13174
Brewer, G. E., Clarkson, J. J., Maurin, O., Zuntini, A. R., Barber, V., Bellot, S., et al. (2019). Factors affecting targeted sequencing of 353 nuclear genes from herbarium specimens spanning the diversity of Angiosperms. Front. Plant Sci. 10:1102. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.01102
Buerki, S., and Baker, W. J. (2015). Collections-based research in the genomic era. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 117, 5–10. doi: 10.1111/bij.12721
Délye, C., Deulvot, C., and Chauvel, B. (2013). DNA analysis of herbarium specimens of the grass weed Alopecurus myosuroides reveals herbicide resistance pre-dated herbicides. PLoS ONE 8:e75117. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0075117
Dodsworth, S., Chase, M. W., Kelly, L. J., Leitch, I. J., Macas, J., Novák, P., et al. (2015). Genomic repeat abundances contain phylogenetic signal. Syst. Biol. 64, 112–126. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syu080
Drábková, L., Kirschner, J., and Vlcek, C. (2002). Comparison of seven DNA extraction and amplification protocols in historic herbarium specimens of Juncaceae. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 20, 161–175. doi: 10.1007/BF02799431
Erkens, R. H. J., Cross, H., Maas, J. W., Hoenselaar, K., and Chatrou, L. W. (2008). Age and greenness of herbarium specimens as predictors for successful extraction and amplification of DNA. Blumea 53, 407–428. doi: 10.3767/000651908X608052
Exposito-Alonso, M., Becker, C., Schuenemann, V. J., Reiter, E., Setzer, C., Slovak, R., et al. (2018). The rate and potential relevance of new mutations in a colonizing plant lineage. PLoS Genet. 14:e1007155. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007155
Gregory, T. R., Nicol, J. A., Tamm, H., Kullman, B., Kullman, K., Leitch, I. J., et al. (2007). Eukaryotic genome size databases. Nucleic Acids Research, 35, D332–D338. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkl828
Gutaker, R. M., Reiter, E., Furtwängler, A., Schuenemann, V. J., and Burbano, H. A. (2017). Extraction of ultrashort DNA molecules from herbarium specimens. Biotechniques 62, 76–79. doi: 10.2144/000114517
Hardion, L., Verlaque, R., Kaymak, E., Vila, B., Haan-Archipoff, G., Martin, M. M., et al. (2020). Plastome sequencing of a 167-year-old herbarium specimen and classical morphology resolve the systematics of two potentially extinct grass species. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. boaa065. doi: 10.1093/botlinnean/boaa065
Hart, M. L., Forrest, L. L., Nicholls, J. A., and Kidner, C. A. (2016). Retrieval of hundreds of nuclear loci from herbarium specimens. Taxon 65, 1081–1092. doi: 10.12705/655.9
James, S. A., Soltis, P. S., Belbin, L., Chapman, A. D., Nelson, G., Paul, D. L., et al. (2018). Herbarium data: global biodiversity and societal botanical needs for novel research: global. Appl. Plant Sci. 6:e1024. doi: 10.1002/aps3.1024
Lang, P. L. M., Weiß, C. L., Kersten, S., Latorre, S. M., Nagel, S., Nickel, B., et al. (2020). Hybridization ddRAD-sequencing for population genomics of nonmodel plants using highly degraded historical specimen DNA. Mol. Ecol. Resour. doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.13168
Lewin, H. A., Robinson, G. E., Kress, W. J., Baker, W. J., Coddington, J., Crandall, K. A., et al. (2018). Earth BioGenome Project: Sequencing life for the future of life. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 115, 4325–4333. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1720115115
Martin, M. D., Cappellini, E., Samaniego, J. A., Zepeda, M. L., Campos, P. F., Seguin-Orlando, A., et al. (2013). Reconstructing genome evolution in historic samples of the Irish potato famine pathogen. Nat. Commun. 4, 1–7. doi: 10.1038/ncomms3172
Mateiu, L. M., and Rannala, B. H. (2008). Bayesian inference of errors in ancient DNA caused by postmortem degradation. Mol. Biol. Evol. 25, 1503–1511. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msn095
Prosser, S. W. J., deWaard, J. R., Miller, S. E., and Hebert, P. D. N. (2016). DNA barcodes from century-old type specimens using next-generation sequencing. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 16, 487–497. doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.12474
Queenborough, S. (2017). Collections-based studies of plant functional traits. in Pp 223-236 in I. Friis and H. Balslev (eds), Tropical Plant Collections: Legacies from the Past? Essential Tools for the Future? Sci. Danica B 6, 15–38. Available online at: http://84.19.174.124/books/692/4979?lang=en
Roldán-Arjona, T., and Ariza, R. R. (2009). Repair and tolerance of oxidative DNA damage in plants. Mut. Res. 681, 169–179. doi: 10.1016/j.mrrev.2008.07.003
Särkinen, T., Staats, M., Richardson, J. E., Cowan, R. S., and Bakker, F. T. (2012). How to open the treasure chest? optimising DNA extraction from herbarium specimens. PLoS ONE 7:e43808. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0043808
Savolainen, V., Cuénoud, P., Spichiger, R., Martinez, M. D. P., Crèvecoeur, M., and Manen, J.-F. (1995). The use of hebarium specimens in DNA phylogenetics: evaluation and improvement. Plant Syst. Evol. 197, 87–98.
Seberg, O., Droege, G., Barker, K., Coddington, J. A., Funk, A., Gostel, M., et al. (2016). Global genome biodiversity network: saving a blueprint of the Tree of Life – A botanical perspective. Ann. Bot. 118, 393–399. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcw121
Soltis, P. S. (2017). Digitization of herbaria enables novel research. Am J Bot. 104:1–4. doi: 10.3732/ajb.1700281
Staats, M., Cuence, A., Richardson, J. E., Vrielink-van Ginkel, R., Petersen, G., Seberg, O., et al. (2011). DNA damage in plant herbarium tissue. PLoS ONE 6:e28448. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0028448
Staats, M., Erkens, R. H. J., van de Vossenberg, B., Wieringa, J. J., Kraaijeveld, K., Stielow, B., et al. (2013). Genomic treasure troves: complete genome sequencing of herbarium and insect museum specimens. PLoS ONE 8:e69189. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0069189
Straub, S. C. K., Parks, M., Weitemeir, K., Fishbein, M., Cronn, R., Liston, A., et al. (2012). Navigating the tip of the genomic iceberg: next-generation sequencing for plant systematics. Am. J. Bot. 99, 349–364. doi: 10.3732/ajb.1100335
Telle, S., and Thines, M. (2008). Amplification of cox2 (~620 bp) from 2 mg of up to 129 years old herbarium specimens, comparing 19 extraction methods and 15 polymerases. PLoS ONE 3:e3584. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003584
Van de Paer, C., Bouchez, O., and Besnard, G. (2018). Prospects on the evolutionary mitogenomics of plants: a case study on the olive family (Oleaceae). Mol. Ecol. Resour. 18, 407–423. doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.12742
Viruel, J., Conejero, M., Hidalgo, O., Pokorny, L., Powell, R. F., Forest, F., et al. (2019). A Target capture-based method to estimate ploidy from herbarium specimens. Front. Plant Sci. 10:937. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00937
Weiss, C. L., Schuenemann, V. J., Devos, J., Shirsekar, G., Reiter, E., Gould, B. A., et al. (2016). Temporal patterns of damage and decay kinetics of DNA retrieved from plant herbarium specimens. R. Soc. Open Sci. 3:160239. doi: 10.1098/rsos.160239
Welch, A. J., Collins, K., Ratan, A., Drautz-Moses, D. I., Schuster, S. C., and Lindqvist, C. (2016). The quest to resolve recent radiations: plastid phylogenomics of extinct and endangered Hawaiian endemic mints (Lamiaceae). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 99, 16–33. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2016.02.024
Wicke, S., and Schneeweiss, G. M. (2015). “Next-generation organellar genomics: potentials and pitfalls of high-throughput technologies for molecular evolutionary studies and plant systematics,” in Next Generation Sequencing in Plant Systematics, eds E. Hörandl and M. S. Appelhans [Hessen: International Association for Plant Taxonomy (IAPT)], 9–50.
Wilkinson, M. J., Szabo, C., Ford, C. S., Yarom, Y., Croxford, A. E., Camp, A., et al. (2017). Replacing sanger with next generation sequencing to improve coverage and quality of reference DNA barcodes for plants. Sci. Rep. 7:46040. doi: 10.1038/srep46040
Yoshida, K., Burbano, H. A., Krause, J., Thines, M., Weigel, D., and Kamoun, S. (2014). Mining herbaria for plant pathogen genomes: back to the future. PLoS Pathog. 10:e1004028. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004028
Yoshida, K., Sasaki, E., and Kamoun, S. (2015). Computational analyses of ancient pathogen DNA from herbarium samples: challenges and prospects. Front. Plant Sci. 6:771. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.00771
Zedane, L., Hong-Wa, C., Murienne, J., Jeziorsky, C., Baldwin, B. G., and Besnard, G. (2015). Museomics illuminate the history of an extinct, paleoendemic plant lineage (Hesperelaea, Oleaceae) known from an 1875 collection from Guadalupe Island, Mexico. Biol. J. Linnean Soc. 117, 44–57. doi: 10.1111/bij.12509
Keywords: biosystematics, botany, herbarium genetics, phylogenomics, population genomics, pathogenomics, ancient DNA, collection-based research
Citation: Bakker FT, Bieker VC and Martin MD (2020) Editorial: Herbarium Collection-Based Plant Evolutionary Genetics and Genomics. Front. Ecol. Evol. 8:603948. doi: 10.3389/fevo.2020.603948
Received: 08 September 2020; Accepted: 07 October 2020;
Published: 30 October 2020.
Edited and reviewed by: Samuel A. Cushman, United States Forest Service (USDA), United States
Copyright © 2020 Bakker, Bieker and Martin. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Michael D. Martin, sameoldmike@gmail.com