Sec. Conservation and Restoration Ecology
Volume 11 - 2023 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2023.1173638
Editorial: Drivers of small-mammal community structure in tropical savannas
- 1Department of Biology, Valdosta State University, Valdosta, GA, United States
- 2School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- 3Department of Biological Sciences, University of Eswatini, Kwaluseni, Eswatini
- 4Department of Zoology and Entomology, Mammal Research Institute, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
- 5Department of Ecology and Graduate Program in Ecology, University of Brasília, Brasília, DF, Brazil
Editorial on the Research Topic
Drivers of small-mammal community structure in tropical savannas
Tropical and subtropical savanna ecosystems (TSE; Figure 1) contribute ~30% of terrestrial primary productivity globally (Grace et al., 2006), while covering 20% of the land area of the Neotropics, sub-Saharan Africa, southern Asia, and northern Australia (Bond, 2016). The tremendous productivity of intact TSE is consumed by—among others—a diverse mammalian fauna of small herbivores and omnivores and both native and domestic large herbivores. Much of it, though, is pre-emptively consumed by fire. Large fires are conspicuously concentrated in regions of TSE, particularly sub-Saharan Africa, the Cerrado of Brazil, and northern Australia (Giglio et al., 2021). Herbivores help shape fire regimes, and fire regimes in turn shape herbivory (Young et al., 2022). We opened this Research Topic because, relative to their counterparts in tropical forests and temperate grasslands, the ecological roles of smaller mammals (small rodents, marsupials, shrews, etc.) in TSE are poorly understood (Schieltz and Rubenstein, 2016). Our particular focus was what habitat-related factors drive species composition, abundance, diversity, and trophic and non-trophic relationships. We invited participation of small-mammal ecological researchers with field experience on all four continents hosting TSE.
Figure 1. Views of tropical savanna habitats from three of the continents indicative of where small-mammal studies in this Research Topic were conducted: (A) open savanna on red sandy loam soils of the Laikipia Plateau, central Kenya, overstory dominated by Senegalia mellifera, S. brevispica and Vachellia etbaica, with a discontinuous understory layer dominated by the grasses Digitaria milanjiana, Cynodon dactylon, Pennisetum mezianum, and P. stramineum (photo by Bradley J. Bergstrom); (B) overall view of a typical savanna landscape (known as cerrado sensu stricto) associated with sandy soils of the Cerrado biome (photo by André F. Mendonça, taken at Jatobá Farm, Jaborandi municipality, state of Bahia, northeastern Brazil); (C) typical Eucalyptus miniata dominated open savanna forest characteristic of tropical, high-rainfall savannas (>1000 mm) in the Top End of the Northern Territory and parts of the Kimberley region, Western Australia (photo by Ian Radford, taken on the Mitchell Plateau, north Kimberley); (D) typical southern African savanna dominated by acacia trees, with Dichrostachys cinerea in the shrub layer, and a dense tall grass layer; southern Kruger National Park, South Africa (photo by Ara Monadjem; note termite mound, a conspicuous landscape feature of TSE in Africa, South America, and Australia).
We were particularly interested in studies of the effects on small-mammal community structure of three major endogenous disturbances with which TSEs have evolved: fire, large-mammalian herbivory (LMH), and drought (Buisson et al., 2019). Only in African and parts of southern Asian TSE are native large herbivores still an important component of the trophic system, but domestic livestock herbivory is an important force shaping landscapes and biota in nearly all areas of intact TSE. Shrub encroachment is another driver of small-mammal community changes; this phenomenon may be an indirect effect of long-term changes to the other three disturbance regimes, or it may result from introduction of invasive exotic shrubs. Anthropogenic habitat destruction, alteration, and fragmentation, directly and indirectly through climate change make it even more urgent that we understand how habitat factors influence abundance and diversity of TSE small mammals. Murid rodents, a speciose family occurring in all areas of TSE, are especially important because of their diverse roles as dispersers and predators of savanna trees and shrubs (e.g., Maclean et al., 2011; Schoepf and Pillay, 2023) and as reservoirs of zoonotic disease arising in the tropics (Lecompte et al., 2006; Limongi et al., 2016).
What we know includes, for example, that heavy grazing by both native and domestic LMH in African TSE suppresses abundance and diversity (taxonomic and functional) of small mammals (Bergstrom et al., 2018; McCleery et al., 2018), that the same effect is caused by cattle in Australia (Radford et al., 2015), and that wildfires in the Brazilian Cerrado can cause a temporary shift in dominance from a diurnal species to a more insectivorous, nocturnal one (Vieira and Briani, 2013). In all three regions, data show that some small-mammal species are “increasers” in response to loss of cover, even when most others respond negatively to loss of cover due to fire, grazing, or drought, at least over the short term (McDonald et al., 2016; Loggins et al., 2019). Mostly from Australian TSE studies, we know that loss of cover exposes many small mammals to increased predation, especially by feral cats (Leahy et al., 2015); this, and lack of evidence for post-disturbance food limitation (Radford, 2012) argues that the responses of “decreasers” reflect top-down control. “Increaser” species may use non-vegetative cover (rock crevices, burrows), be more nocturnal, and/or may prefer early successional food resources (McDonald et al., 2016; Bergstrom et al., 2018). Whether this holds true for southern Asian species is currently unknown (Bergstrom et al.).
Summaries of articles in the Research Topic
While fire is a variable in the background of any study of TSE habitats of small mammals, three studies in this Research Topic explicitly examined the effects of fire on small-mammal communities: occurrence of fire in gallery forests within the Brazilian Cerrado increased the density of understory plants and herbaceous cover, decreased small-mammal species richness and abundance, and reduced seed removal rates by small rodents (Cazetta and Vieira); in northern Australian TSE, small-mammal abundance and diversity were enhanced at local scales by rock and shrub cover, by reduced late-dry-season burning, and by maximization of long-unburned and ungrazed habitat patches–presumably as predator refuges–but not by a mosaic of burned patches (Radford et al.). In a long-term compilation of studies of the rodent Necromys lasiurus in the patchy Alter do Chão savannas of the Amazon region, neither fire at a regional scale nor climate change was found to influence the species' population dynamics as much as food availability (da Rosa et al.). A fourth study looked at the effects of loss of tree cavities (hollows)—driven largely by fires, but also by LMH and tropical cyclones—on three threatened, regionally endemic, semi-arboreal savanna small mammals on northern Australia's Melville Island and found that their abundance was associated with availability of shrubby habitat patches rather than tree hollows, with the former providing refuges from feral cat predation (Penton et al.).
No study in the Research Topic focused primarily on LMH as a predictor of small-mammal community structure, although LMH was one of the indirect influences on habitat variability in the study by Penton et al. and 18 previously published studies on LMH effects on TSE small mammals were reviewed by Bergstrom et al.
Three studies in the Research Topic examined small-mammal communities in areas undergoing woody shrub encroachment: in native dry grasslands of western India, some rodents responded negatively to the invasion of the exotic Prosopis and the concomitant loss of grassy cover, whereas others responded positively to heavy encroachment (Misher et al.); murid rodents of southern African savannas depredated seeds of the invading shrub Dichrostachys a third more than those of the native canopy tree Senegalia (Teman et al.), suggesting they might control this invasion; and in the Brazilian Cerrado, woody encroachment driven by active fire suppression had species-specific consequences for small mammals, with some open-grassland specialists being negatively affected including two Cerrado endemic and regionally vulnerable murid species (Furtado et al.).
Two papers examined effects of loss of habitat amount and quality and of patch size due to fragmentation on the small-mammal community: habitat generalists were less affected by variation in these three attributes than habitat specialists in the Brazilian Cerrado, and species composition was better explained by habitat features at the local scale, whereas species richness was better explained by landscape-scale metrics (Melo et al.). Studying 36 forest patches within a Cerrado savanna matrix, smaller patches had higher small-mammal abundance, richness of generalist species increased with amount of habitat in the landscape, and richness of specialists increased with increasing quality of the habitat (Mattos et al.).
Two other papers examined cross-habitat comparisons of small-mammal richness and abundance in TSE: in a large-scale study across half of the Cerrado biome that has not been lost to agricultural conversion, heterogeneity of habitats (grassland, typical savanna, and forest formations) at all spatial scales examined was a good predictor of species richness and abundance and occurrence of narrowly distributed species (Carmignotto et al.). The miombo of Tanzania is unusual within the African savanna biome in that the unpalatability of grasses leads to absence of LMH and their predators. This camera-trap study had a detection threshold for body sizes larger than the focal mammals of other studies in this Research Topic (including several small carnivores), but for 19 species of meso-mammals detected, site utilization was greater in gallery forest than in woodland, and for several of these species—including a large murid—detections were significantly associated with termite mounds (D'Ammando et al.).
A global review of mostly experimental field studies of the effects of habitat-altering disturbances on TSE small-mammal community structure found 63 studies, of which 33 studied effects of fire, 18 of LMH, and eight of shrub encroachment. Most conclusive studies found that either loss of cover, or a combination of cover loss and alteration of food resources, explained small-mammal responses, which were mostly negative to loss of cover (Bergstrom et al.). Research gaps include any studies of LMH (cattle grazing) from South America, and any studies at all from southern Asia (but see Misher et al.).
We hope the new studies published in this Research Topic will advance our understanding of habitat-driven effects on TSE small-mammal communities and of certain species of interest due to their endangerment, their provision of ecosystem services, or their potential as zoonotic disease reservoirs. We further hope this set of studies will encourage small-mammal ecologists to fill research gaps by conducting experimental studies in all TSE areas, particularly south Asia, and LMH studies in the Neotropics.
All authors listed have made a substantial, direct, and intellectual contribution to the work and approved it for publication.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Bergstrom, B. J., Sensenig, R. L., Augustine, D. J., and Young, T. P. (2018). Searching for cover: soil enrichment and herbivore exclusion, not fire, enhance African savanna small-mammal abundance. Ecosphere 9, e02519. doi: 10.1002/ecs2.2519
Buisson, E., Stradic, S. L., Silveira, F. A. O., Durigan, G., Overbeck, G. E., Fidelis, A., et al. (2019). Resilience and restoration of tropical and subtropical grasslands, savannas, and grassy woodlands. Biol. Rev. 94, 590–609. doi: 10.1111/brv.12470
Giglio, L., Justice, C., Boschetti, L., and Roy, D. (2021). MODIS/Terra+Aqua Burned Area Monthly L3 Global 500m SIN Grid V061, distributed by NASA EOSDIS Land Processes DAAC. Available online at: https://doi.org/10.5067/MODIS/MCD64A1.061 (accessed January 21, 2023).
Leahy, L., Legge, S. M., Tuft, K., McGregor, H. W., Barmuta, L. A., Jones, M. E., et al. (2015). Amplified predation after fire suppresses rodent populations in Australia's tropical savannas. Wildl. Res. 42, 705–771. doi: 10.1071/WR15011
Lecompte, E., Fichet-Calvet, E., Daffis, S., Koulemou, K., Sylla, O., Kourouma, F., et al. (2006). Mastomys natalensis and Lassa fever, West Africa. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 12, 1971–1974. doi: 10.3201/eid1212.060812
Limongi, J. E., Oliveira, R. C., Guterres, A., Costa Neto, S. F., Fernandes, J., Vicente, L. H., et al. (2016). Hantavirus pulmonary syndrome and rodent reservoirs in the savanna-like biome of Brazil's southeastern region. Epidemiol. Infect. 144, 1107–1116. doi: 10.1017/S095026881500237X
Loggins, A. A., Shrader, A. M., Monadjem, A., and McCleery, R. A. (2019). Shrub cover homogenizes small mammals' activity and perceived predation risk. Sci. Rep. 9, 16857. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-53071-y
Maclean, J. E., Goheen, J. R., Doak, D. F., Palmer, T. M., and Young, T. P. (2011). Cryptic herbivores mediate the strength and form of ungulate impacts on a long-lived savanna tree. Ecology 92, 1626–1636. doi: 10.1890/10-2097.1
McCleery, R., Monadjem, A., Baiser, B., and Fletcher, R. Jr, Vickers, K., and Kruger, L. (2018). Animal diversity declines with broad-scale homogenization of canopy cover in African savannas. Biol. Cons. 226, 54–62. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2018.07.020
McDonald, P. J., Stewart, A., Schubert, A. T., Nano, C. E. M., Dickman, C. R., Luck, G. W., et al. (2016). Fire and grass cover influence occupancy patterns of rare rodents and feral cats in a mountain refuge: implications for management. Wildl. Res. 43, 121–129. doi: 10.1071/WR15220
Radford, I. J., Gibson, L. A., Corey, B., Carnes, K., and Fairman, R. (2015). Influence of fire mosaics, habitat characteristics and cattle disturbance on mammals in fire prone savanna landscapes of the northern Kimberley. PLoS ONE 10, e0130721. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0130721
Schieltz, J. M., and Rubenstein, D. I. (2016). Evidence based review: Positive versus negative effects of livestock grazing on wildlife. What do we really know? Environ. Res. Letters 11, 113003. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/11/11/113003
Vieira, E. M., and Briani, D. C. (2013). Short-term effects of fire on small rodents in the Brazilian Cerrado and their relation with feeding habits. Int. J. Wildland Fire 22, 1063–1071. doi: 10.1071/WF12153
Keywords: fire, herbivory, shrub encroachment, small-mammal community, vegetative cover
Citation: Bergstrom BJ, Dickman CR, Monadjem A and Vieira EM (2023) Editorial: Drivers of small-mammal community structure in tropical savannas. Front. Ecol. Evol. 11:1173638. doi: 10.3389/fevo.2023.1173638
Received: 24 February 2023; Accepted: 18 April 2023;
Published: 03 May 2023.
Edited and reviewed by: Ed Heske, University of New Mexico, United States
Copyright © 2023 Bergstrom, Dickman, Monadjem and Vieira. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Bradley J. Bergstrom, email@example.com