REVIEW article

Front. Immunol., 28 March 2025

Sec. Inflammation

Volume 16 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2025.1575554

Liver injury in sepsis: manifestations, mechanisms and emerging therapeutic strategies

  • 1. The First Hospital of Lanzhou University & The First School of Clinical Medicine, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China

  • 2. Department of Critical Care Medicine, The First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China

Article metrics

View details

25

Citations

9,5k

Views

1,9k

Downloads

Abstract

Sepsis is defined as a condition related to infection that manifests with multiorgan dysfunction, representing a life-threatening state. Consequently, severe complications frequently occur, with liver injury being one of the most prevalent serious complications of sepsis. Liver dysfunction during sepsis serves as an independent predictor of mortality. This review provides a comprehensive overview of current research on sepsis-induced liver injury (SILI), encompassing the clinical manifestations, diagnostic criteria, pathogenesis and therapeutic strategies associated with this condition. SILI may manifest as hypoxic hepatitis due to ischemia and shock, cholestasis resulting from abnormal bile metabolism, or bile duct sclerosis. The pathophysiology of sepsis involves intricate interactions among the inflammatory response, oxidative stress, and cell death. All of these factors complicate treatment and represent potential targets for therapeutic intervention. Furthermore, this review addresses the limitations inherent in conventional therapies currently employed for managing SILI and emphasizes the potential of novel targeted strategies aimed at addressing the fundamental mechanisms underlying this condition.

1 Introduction

Sepsis is a potentially fatal syndrome that arises from multiorgan dysfunction stemming from the host’s dysregulated response to infection. Currently, it has emerged as one of the leading contributors to infection-related mortality worldwide (1). According to epidemiological data, the annual incidence of adult sepsis is approximately 189 cases/100,000 individuals, with a mortality rate as high as 26.7% (2). Notably, 24.4% of sepsis cases occur within the intensive care unit (ICU) (3). Sepsis represents a central focus of medical research because of its high incidence, complex pathogenesis, critical nature, and unfavorable prognosis.

As a crucial metabolic immune organ, the liver clears bacteria and synthesizes acute phase proteins and cytokines during sepsis. Thus, immune defense can be effectively activated through inflammatory responses (4). However, an excessive inflammatory response may cause significant hepatocyte injury. This condition is specifically known as SILI (5). Research has shown that in patients with sepsis complicated by liver dysfunction or failure, the mortality rates range from 54% to 68% (6). These rates are significantly higher than those in patients with respiratory dysfunction or failure (7). Consequently, minimizing liver damage and promoting the recovery of liver function are essential to reduce the mortality rate among patients with sepsis.

With respect to the pivotal role of the liver in the pathophysiology of sepsis, this paper discusses the various types and clinical features of hepatic injury associated with sepsis. It subsequently reviews the critical mechanisms underlying the pathogenesis of hepatic injury, including interactions among inflammatory responses, oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, pyroptosis, and autophagy. This analysis aims to provide new insights and strategies for addressing hepatic injury in sepsis. More specifically, this paper evaluates current clinical trials and emerging therapies that are grounded in these pathogenic mechanisms. This study provides a theoretical framework and practical reference for future treatment strategies targeting SILI.

2 Types of hepatic injury in sepsis and clinical diagnostic criteria

In clinical practice, sepsis may cause various types of liver injury, including hypoxic hepatitis, septic cholestasis, and secondary sclerosing cholangitis (Figure 1). These diverse clinical features associated with SILI complicate the diagnostic process. A better understanding of the specific clinical features related to each type is essential for the early and accurate diagnosis of liver injury in sepsis patients.

Figure 1

2.1 Hypoxic hepatitis

HH typically develops within 48 hours after the occurrence of heart, circulatory, or respiratory failure. It is distinguished by a marked elevation in aminotransferase levels, frequently exceeding the standard upper limit by more than 10 times while ruling out alternative causes of hepatocellular necrosis (8, 9). Histologically, HH is predominantly characterized by central lobular necrosis of hepatocytes (10). Sepsis-induced systemic inflammation in HH adversely affects cardiac pump function, diminishing blood flow to the liver and consequently reducing the oxygen supply. The most common causes of HH include shock (48%), cardiac arrest (25%), and hypoxia (13%) (8). Laboratory features usually include elevated levels of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), mildly increased total bilirubin (mainly unconjugated), and a prolonged international normalized ratio (INR), indicating coagulation dysfunction (8, 11, 12).

2.2 Septic cholestasis

The SC is defined as the accumulation of bile components in the bloodstream due to impaired bile formation, secretion, or excretion during sepsis (13). Dysfunction is typically related to impaired cholangiocyte function without evidence of significant bile duct damage or hepatocyte loss (14). Laboratory tests revealed that the bilirubin level, mainly direct bilirubin, exceeded 2 μmol/L. Additionally, alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and γ-glutamyltransferase (GGT) levels are elevated to more than 2–3 times the normal range, whereas AST and ALT levels are generally within normal limits (9, 15).

2.3 Secondary sclerosing cholangitis

Severe sepsis can lead to SSC, which encompasses chronic inflammation, fibrosis, and stenosis of the bile ducts (16, 17). These pathological changes can ultimately progress to cirrhosis and liver failure (18). More importantly, SSC is positively correlated with severe systemic hypotension, trauma, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), and systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) (19, 20). The major clinical features of SSC include chronic cholestasis, thickening of the bile duct walls, and either narrowing or dilation. These manifestations can be diagnosed through abdominal CT scans or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) (20–22). A distinction should be made from primary sclerosing cholangitis, which is a chronic autoimmune disease.

Considering the high mortality rate of patients with sepsis who experience complications of liver dysfunction, early identification and prompt intervention are crucial for improving patient prognosis.

3 Pathogenesis of hepatic injury in sepsis

The clinical manifestations of hepatic injury in sepsis, such as jaundice, elevated liver enzymes, and prolonged prothrombin time, are closely linked to the underlying pathogenic mechanisms. Understanding these mechanisms can provide insights into why and how liver dysfunction occurs in septic patients. The liver serves a dual function in sepsis: it is responsible for maintaining body homeostasis through the elimination of pathogens and toxins. They are also susceptible to injury due to excessive inflammatory responses and immune dysregulation. The systemic inflammatory cascade in sepsis damages liver cells and impairs their functionality. Moreover, advanced age, alcoholism, diabetes, mellitus and cardiac dysfunction are factors that markedly increase the risk of liver injury in septic patients (23). Therefore, understanding the pathogenesis of SILI is important for elucidating the various clinical manifestations of liver damage observed in sepsis.

Research has shown that the pathogenesis of SILI is intricately related to inflammation and its subsequent cascade reactions, oxidative stress, pyroptosis, autophagy, and the regulation of microRNAs (miRNAs) (Figure 2).

Figure 2

3.1 Inflammation and cascade amplification

The inflammatory response and cascade amplification are central aspects of the pathophysiology of SILI (Figure 3). Under sepsis conditions, bacteria and viruses produce pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs), which are recognized by pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) expressed on host cells. Among these receptors are Toll-like receptors (TLRs) (24). Gram-negative bacteria-derived lipopolysaccharides (LPSs) trigger immune cells, including Kupffer cells (KCs) and monocytes/macrophages, via the TLR4-mediated signaling pathway (25–27). This activation enhances the secretion of proinflammatory cytokines, such as tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin-1β (IL-1β), and interleukin-6 (IL-6). These cytokines not only exacerbate local inflammation but also propagate a systemic inflammatory response, commonly referred to as a “cytokine storm” (28, 29).

Figure 3

Additionally, NOD-like receptors (NLRs) play a crucial role in the inflammatory cascade. NLRs are intracellular PRRs that recognize damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) and PAMPs. Activation of NLRs leads to the formation of inflammasomes, which in turn activate caspase-1 (30). Caspase-1 cleaves pro-IL-1β and pro-IL-18 into their mature forms, further amplifying the inflammatory response. The NF-κB signaling pathway is also a key component of this inflammatory cascade. Upon activation by PAMPs or DAMPs, NF-κB translocates to the nucleus and induces the transcription of proinflammatory cytokines, chemokines, and adhesion molecules, thereby promoting inflammation. Furthermore, infection with gram-positive bacteria, particularly Staphylococcus aureus, significantly increased the risk of acute liver injury among septic patients (23, 31).

Cytokines directly induce hepatocyte apoptosis or necrosis (32). Moreover, increased recruitment of immune cells to the inflamed site aggravates the inflammatory response, resulting in a cascade amplification effect that ultimately leads to multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS). As the liver serves as a central metabolic organ, its dysfunction significantly impairs overall bodily function. Thus, targeting the disruption of this amplification cascade may be an effective therapy to alleviate liver injury.

3.2 Oxidative stress

Oxidative stress is a pivotal mediator of liver injury in sepsis, exacerbating pathophysiological processes through direct hepatocyte damage and compromising the antioxidant defense system.

In sepsis, the excessive generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and reactive nitrogen species (RNS) is a critical factor. Studies have shown that in severe sepsis patients, the levels of ROS can increase by more than 50% compared with those in healthy individuals, while the activities of antioxidant enzymes such as superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase (CAT) are significantly reduced, indicating a state of antioxidant depletion (33, 34). ROS interact with proteins, carbohydrates, nucleic acids, and unsaturated lipids in hepatocytes, causing damage. For example, the interaction of ROS with lipids can lead to lipid peroxidation, which disrupts the integrity of cell membranes and organelles. Additionally, ROS can modify proteins, leading to loss of their function and the potential for aggregation, which can further impair cellular processes (35).

The interplay between oxidative stress and inflammation is intricate and forms a vicious cycle. ROS generation exacerbates inflammatory cascades in several ways (36). Firstly, ROS can activate NF-κB, a key transcription factor that induces the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as tumor TNF-α and IL-6 (37). Studies have shown that in sepsis models, the activation of NF-κB can increase the production of TNF-α by more than 2-fold, further amplifying the inflammatory response (38). Secondly, ROS can also promote the activation of NOD-like receptors (NLRs), leading to the formation of inflammasomes and the activation of caspase-1, which in turn cleaves pro-IL-1β and pro-IL-18 into their mature forms, further amplifying inflammation (39).

Furthermore, oxidative stress contributes to endothelial dysfunction, microthrombosis, hepatic sinusoidal obstruction, and diminished hepatic perfusion, which worsen liver injury (40). For example, the increase in ROS can lead to the activation of endothelial cells, promoting the expression of adhesion molecules and the recruitment of leukocytes, which can cause microvascular inflammation and obstruction (41).

A promising strategy may be incorporating antioxidant therapy into the treatment of sepsis to mitigate oxidative stress-induced liver damage. For example, the use of N-acetylcysteine (NAC), a well-known antioxidant, has been shown to reduce ROS levels by more than 40% and increase antioxidant enzyme activities, thereby alleviating liver injury in sepsis models (42).

3.3 Mitochondrial dysfunction

Mitochondrial dysfunction represents a critical factor contributing to disturbances in liver energy metabolism and organ damage during sepsis (43). Mitochondrial damage is frequently accompanied by increased oxidative stress, which promotes inflammatory responses and apoptosis. These processes are important mechanisms contributing to the deterioration of both the structure and function of the liver.

LPS, through the activation of hepatic cells, induces an overproduction of ROS, which causes damage to the mitochondrial membrane. This not only interferes with the binding of oxygen by cytochrome oxidase, blocking the respiratory chain and causing metabolic breakdown of liver energy but also triggers the release of cytochrome C, initiating hepatocyte apoptosis (33, 44). In septic mice, the release of cytochrome C from mitochondria can increase by up to 3-fold, significantly promoting apoptosis (44, 45). Liver mitochondria undergo structural injury, including mitochondrial swelling, disorganized crista proliferation, and decreased matrix electron density, in severe sepsis (46). Morphological alterations also include proton leakage, modifications in membrane permeability, and possible disruption of the mitochondrial membrane (33). Among these factors, changes in mitochondrial membrane permeability are critical at the beginning of apoptosis (47). Mitochondria induce changes in membrane permeability by releasing cytochrome C and apoptosis-inducing factors. These releases activate the caspase cascade, leading to the initiation of apoptosis or programmed cell death (48, 49). Regulating mitochondrial function represents a promising therapeutic target for mitigating SILI. This approach may offer a valuable strategy for clinical intervention.

3.3.1 Mitochondrial dynamics

In addition to the structural changes, mitochondrial dynamics, encompassing fusion and fission processes, also play a pivotal role in the progression of SILI. Mitochondrial fusion, which is mediated by proteins such as optic atrophy 1 (OPA1) and mitofusin 2 (MFN2), helps maintain mitochondrial integrity and function by facilitating the exchange of mitochondrial contents and the sharing of mitochondrial DNA (42). During sepsis, the balance between mitochondrial fusion and fission is disrupted, leading to impaired mitochondrial function and increased susceptibility to damage.

Conversely, mitochondrial fission, driven by proteins like dynamin-related protein 1 (DRP1), is essential for the segregation of damaged mitochondria and their subsequent degradation through mitophagy (50). However, excessive fission can result in the fragmentation of mitochondria, reducing their energy production efficiency and increasing the production of ROS. Studies have shown that in septic mice, the expression of DRP1 is upregulated, while the levels of OPA1 and MFN2 are decreased, indicating an imbalance in mitochondrial dynamics. This imbalance contributes to the exacerbation of liver injury by promoting mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress.

Regulating mitochondrial dynamics could be a promising therapeutic strategy for mitigating SILI. For instance, promoting mitochondrial fusion by enhancing the expression of OPA1 or inhibiting excessive fission through the modulation of DRP1 activity may help restore mitochondrial function and reduce liver damage. Further research into the specific mechanisms and potential therapeutic targets related to mitochondrial dynamics in SILI is warranted to provide a more comprehensive understanding of this complex process (51).

3.4 Pyroptosis

Pyroptosis is a form of programmed cell death that plays a vital role in the pathogenesis of SILI. The activation of immune cells initiates the pyroptotic pathway, which facilitates the release of inflammatory mediators. In turn, these inflammatory mediators aggravate inflammatory responses and further hepatocyte injury (52).

In the event of an attack by pathogens or inflammatory mediators, hepatocytes release PAMPs or damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs). Upon recognition by PRRs, these molecules initiate the activation of inflammasomes, especially the NOD-like receptor protein 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome, promoting the activation of Caspase-1 (53–55). This activation occurs through a two-step process (56). Initially, PRRs detect PAMPs or DAMPs, triggering the nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) pathway and increasing NLRP3 and pro-IL-1β expression (57). This primes the cell for inflammation. A second signal, such as extracellular ATP or mitochondrial reactive oxygen species (mtROS), subsequently activates the NLRP3 inflammasome (58). Once activated, it recruits and activates Caspase-1 via the ASC adaptor protein, which then processes pro-IL-1β into its mature form for secretion (59). This secretion recruits immune cells to the liver, amplifying inflammation and exacerbating SILI. Activated Caspase-1 not only facilitates the maturation of proinflammatory cytokines such as IL-1β and IL-8 (60–62) but also cleaves gasdermin D (GSDMD), which forms pores in the cell membrane (63). The pores release cellular contents into the extracellular milieu, promoting inflammation and pyroptosis (64–67). The mature IL-1β cytokine recruits innate immune cells to the site of infection and enhances the activation of acquired immune cells. This process amplifies the inflammatory response and exacerbates liver injury. In addition to the classical Caspase-1-mediated pathway, pyroptosis can also be initiated through a nonclassical pathway involving the activation of Caspase-4, Caspase-5, or Caspase-11. Notably, Caspase-4/5 are especially important in humans (55, 68). These caspases can be directly activated by components derived from intracellular pathogens, such as LPS (69), leading to GSDMD cleavage and initiating pyroptosis (54).

Targeting the pyroptosis pathway and preventing its activation offers a promising strategy for reducing liver injury and may provide a novel therapeutic approach for the management of SILI.

3.5 Autophagy mechanism

Autophagy is crucial for cellular self-protection and the maintenance of homeostasis by degrading unnecessary proteins and damaged organelles (70). It also plays a vital role in regulating mitochondrial homeostasis by selectively removing damaged mitochondria through mitophagy, which helps maintain cellular energy production and prevent the accumulation of harmful reactive ROS (71, 72).

Mitophagy, the selective autophagy of damaged or dysfunctional mitochondria, is triggered by the loss of mitochondrial membrane potential. This process marks damaged mitochondria with ubiquitin, leading to their recognition and engulfment by autophagosomes. These autophagosomes then fuse with lysosomes, where lysosomal enzymes degrade the contents, ensuring only dysfunctional mitochondria are eliminated while preserving healthy ones for cellular energy needs (73).

Mitophagy is mediated by two main pathways: the ubiquitin-dependent PINK1/Parkin pathway and ubiquitin-independent pathways. In the PINK1/Parkin pathway, PINK1 stabilizes on the outer mitochondrial membrane upon membrane potential loss, recruiting Parkin (74). Parkin ubiquitinates mitochondrial proteins, marking them for degradation (74). Autophagy receptors like p62 recognize these ubiquitinated mitochondria and link them to autophagosomes for clearance (75). Ubiquitin-independent pathways involve mitochondrial proteins such as NIX and BNIP3, which can directly interact with LC3 to initiate autophagosome formation around mitochondria, offering alternative mechanisms for maintaining mitochondrial homeostasis (71, 76).

Research has revealed that SILI is closely associated with impaired autophagy activity in the liver (77). At an early stage of SILI, autophagic flux is increased, resulting in increased accumulation of autophagosomes. However, the number of autophagy-lysosomes decreases, leading to incomplete autophagy and further aggravating liver injury (77). Defective autophagy also results in the accumulation of damaged mitochondria, which further promotes cell death and worsens liver injury (78). When autophagy is overactivated, it may lead to the degradation of essential cellular components, resulting in cell dysfunction and death. In SILI, the excessive production of ROS and the activation of inflammatory signaling pathways can trigger excessive autophagy, which in turn exacerbates liver injury. For instance, the overactivation of autophagy can cause the loss of mitochondrial mass and impair cellular respiration, leading to energy deficiency and cell death (79). These findings suggest that autophagy dysfunction may be critical in the onset and progression of liver injury during sepsis.

Although most research on autophagy remains experimental, its critical role in maintaining cellular homeostasis and alleviating liver injury is undeniable. This pathway can modulate autophagy, particularly in the formation and degradation of autophagosomes, to restore the autophagy-lysosome system. This path offers a novel therapeutic approach for treating liver injury resulting from sepsis. This provides not only a fundamental theoretical basis but also new hope for addressing SILI.

3.6 Epigenetic regulation

Noncoding RNAs, including miRNAs and long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs), modulate mRNA stability and translation efficiency post-transcriptionally by binding to target mRNAs. These RNAs play key regulatory roles in apoptosis, inflammation, and other cellular processes.

Epigenetic factors, such as DNA methylation and histone modifications, also significantly influence hepatic inflammatory responses by altering gene expression patterns without changing the DNA sequence (80). DNA methylation, primarily occurring at CpG islands, can lead to gene silencing by inhibiting the binding of transcription factors or recruiting methyl-binding proteins (81). Aberrant methylation patterns during sepsis affect genes involved in immunity and survival. For example, hypermethylation of the promoter region of the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 reduces its expression, impairing the anti-inflammatory response (82).

Histone modifications, including acetylation, methylation, and phosphorylation, regulate gene transcription by altering chromatin structure (83). Acetylation of histone H3 at the promoter regions of proinflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α and IL-6 enhances their transcription, exacerbating liver injury (84). Conversely, deacetylation by histone deacetylases (HDACs) suppresses inflammatory responses and protects against liver damage (85). These epigenetic changes can create a vicious cycle where inflammation and oxidative stress synergistically worsen liver damage, highlighting the potential of targeting these mechanisms for therapeutic intervention.

Dysregulation of the expression of several miRNAs during sepsis is associated with liver injury. Studies have shown that miR-133a is highly expressed in both septic patients and cecal ligation and perforation (CLP) model mice and that its knockout attenuates liver injury, indicating that miR-133a might play a key role in SILI (86). Increased expression of miR-155 causes the inactivation of nuclear factor E2-related factor 2 (Nrf2), which elevates oxidative stress and exacerbates SILI (87). Additionally, miR-126-5p is highly upregulated in liver cells in both in vivo and in vitro models of sepsis. The overexpression of miR-126-5p induces cell apoptosis, thereby corroborating its involvement in SILI (88). In contrast, miR-122a has shown sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of SILI, suggesting its potential as a biomarker for SILI (89).

Previous studies have preliminarily verified the clinical value of lncRNAs in sepsis (90). For example, the lncRNA CRND is significantly downregulated in septic rats and LPS-treated hepatocytes. This downregulation of the lncRNA CRND might exacerbate the severity of SILI (88). In addition, the lncRNA NEAT1 can compete with Let-7a to regulate TLR4 to promote the development of SILI (91). The expression of the lncRNA MALAT is upregulated in SILI, where it binds to polypyrimidine tract-binding protein 1 (PTBP1). This interaction engages interferon-induced helicase C-domain protein 1 (IFIH1). The binding of these proteins promotes the polarization of M1 macrophages, thereby worsening SILI (92).

These findings illustrate that a complex mechanism underlies the regulatory effects of lncRNAs on SILI. LncRNAs function in SILI by modulating miRNAs through interactions as ceRNAs (also known as miRNA sponges), thereby inhibiting both their expression and function. The lncRNA CRNDE aggravates liver injury by regulating miR-126-5p and BCL2L2 (88). The lncRNA-220-miR-5101-ceRNA complex mediates LPS-induced liver injury through the phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/protein kinase B (AKT)/mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling pathway. It influences the regulation of autophagy and apoptosis in Kupffer cells triggered by LPS (93). Similarly, the lncRNA CASC7 facilitates LPS-induced liver injury during sepsis through the miR-217/TLR4 axis (94). Moreover, the lncRNA SNGH11 mediates ferroptosis in SILI via the miR-324-3p/glutathione peroxidase 4 (GPX4) axis (95).

In addition, circRNAs have the capacity to adsorb and neutralize many miRNAs to influence gene expression regulation. For instance, circ-Katnal1 exacerbates inflammatory pyrogenesis in SILI through the miR-31-5p/GSDMD axis (96).

Therefore, dysregulation of the expression of miRNAs and lncRNAs, as well as their interaction, may disrupt critical physiological processes such as the inflammatory response and cell death, contributing to liver injury in sepsis. In this context, a thorough investigation into the roles and mechanisms of these noncoding RNAs is paramount for identifying new potential therapeutic targets.

Notably, all the aforementioned pathogenic mechanisms do not operate in isolation. Rather, they are interconnected and form a complex network of pathogenesis. The close relationship between inflammation and oxidative stress represents a critical element of this network. The inflammatory response triggers the release of numerous inflammatory mediators and cytokines that induce oxidative stress, leading to lipid peroxidation of the cell membrane, protein oxidation, and DNA damage. In turn, oxidative stress further activates inflammatory signaling pathways that enhance the infiltration of inflammatory cells and the secretion of mediators, thus aggravating the inflammatory response. In addition, both inflammation and oxidative stress influence pyroptosis, a form of programmed cell death that is precisely regulated by noncoding RNAs. These mechanisms interact synergistically. Each factor creates a vicious cycle that exacerbates liver damage and SILI. Consequently, a more in-depth investigation into the pathogenesis of SILI is warranted not only to elucidate its intricate pathogenic network but also to provide a scientific foundation for the development of new therapeutic strategies.

In addition to noncoding RNAs, epigenetic modifications such as histone modifications and DNA methylation also significantly influence gene expression and cellular functions during SILI.

Histone modifications, including acetylation, methylation, and phosphorylation, can alter the chromatin structure and accessibility, thereby regulating gene transcription. For example, acetylation of histone H3 at the promoter regions of proinflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α and IL-6 has been shown to enhance their transcription and exacerbate liver injury in sepsis models (97). Conversely, deacetylation of histones by HDACs can suppress inflammatory responses and protect against liver damage (98).

DNA methylation, which primarily occurs at CpG islands, can lead to gene silencing by inhibiting the binding of transcription factors or recruiting methyl-binding proteins. Aberrant DNA methylation patterns have been observed in the liver during sepsis, affecting the expression of genes involved in immune responses and cell survival. Hypermethylation of the promoter region of the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 has been reported in septic patients, resulting in decreased IL-10 expression and impaired anti-inflammatory capacity (99). On the other hand, hypomethylation of the proapoptotic gene Bim has been associated with increased Bim expression and hepatocyte apoptosis in sepsis (100).

These findings highlight the potential of targeting histone modifications and DNA methylation as therapeutic strategies for SILI. For instance, the use of histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACis) has shown promise in reducing inflammation and improving liver function in sepsis models (101). Similarly, DNA methyltransferase inhibitors (DNMTis) may help restore the expression of beneficial genes and alleviate liver injury (102).

4 Treatment of hepatic injury in sepsis

4.1 Conventional treatment

The conventional treatment strategy for SILI is systematic and multifaceted to improve outcomes. Central to this therapy is anti-infection treatment. The early initiation of antibiotic therapy is essential for the rapid elimination of pathogens and prevention of infection spread, thereby controlling the progression of SILI (103). Effective management of the infection source by surgical or interventional procedures, such as abscess drainage, can drastically reduce pathogen loads.

Initial fluid resuscitation and hemodynamic support are fundamental components for achieving circulatory stability in SILI patients (104). Nutritional support and metabolic control can improve the intestinal microbiota, enhance the immune response and improve patient recovery (105).

Liver function support constitutes a component of the treatment regimen. This may lead to the incorporation of artificial liver devices that help detoxify and regenerate hepatocytes. Blood purification techniques are employed to eliminate toxins from the body, alleviating the metabolic burden on the liver (106, 107).

However, conventional therapeutic options for SILI present several disadvantages in clinical treatment. With the continuous increase in antibiotic resistance, selecting valid antibiotics has become more complicated, complicating treatment strategies and possibly leading to persistent infections that exacerbate liver damage. Moreover, multiple drugs tend to produce drug interactions that can increase liver and kidney toxicity while limiting available therapeutic options. These factors might further worsen organ dysfunction and negatively impact treatment outcomes.

Moreover, septic liver injury is frequently accompanied by dysfunction in other organs, rendering comprehensive intervention based on single-organ support therapies significantly more challenging. Presently, there is a lack of effective therapeutic targets against the underlying pathophysiological processes involved in SILI. This limitation severely restricts the efficacy of existing treatments and fundamentally hinders improvements in patient prognosis.

4.2 Research progress in new therapies

As discussed above, SILI has a complex and multilevel pathogenesis. Effective treatment of SILI can be achieved only by addressing the interconnected pathogenic mechanisms in conjunction with managing liver injury itself. The optimal therapeutic intervention must target various stages of the disease, taking into account not only hepatic and systemic inflammatory responses but also organ dysfunction.

4.2.1 New drug delivery systems

Nanodrug delivery systems utilize nanotechnology to achieve targeted and precise drug delivery to damaged liver tissues, which increases drug bioavailability while minimizing toxic side effects. Different delivery platforms, including liposomes, solid lipid nanoparticles, and polymer micelles, have been developed for the treatment of SILI and have shown promising therapeutic effects. Collectively, these findings provide robust support for the potential clinical application of nanotechnology-based therapies in the management of SILI (108–111).

4.2.2 Immunoregulatory therapy

Immunoregulatory therapies are designed to modulate the activities of immune cells to mitigate the inflammatory injury caused by sepsis. This modulation can be achieved through the administration of monoclonal antibodies that neutralize key inflammatory mediators, such as TNF-α and IL-6 (112). Alternatively, IL-1 receptor antagonists may be employed to inhibit the signaling pathways involved in inflammation (113, 114). Furthermore, the Decoy Receptor 3 (DcR3) analog DCR3-SUMO protein has emerged as both a biomarker and a therapeutic target in the inflammatory response. Research indicates that DCR3-SUMO has anti-inflammatory properties. It improves tissue morphology in sepsis models, increases survival rates, and significantly reduces serum levels as well as liver and lung concentrations of various inflammatory markers (115).

4.2.3 Antioxidative stress therapy

Antioxidative stress therapies aim to modulate critical signaling pathways that suppress oxidative stress and inflammation to protect the liver. These pathways include the NF-κB (116), Forkhead box O (FOXO) (117, 118), silent information regulator 1 (SIRT1)/NRF2/heme oxygenase-1(HO-1) pathways (119), and mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs), such as extracellular signal-regulated kinases (ERKs), c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNKs), and p38 (120). NAC has been demonstrated to ameliorate liver dysfunction by reducing lipid peroxides and increasing antioxidant capacity (121, 122). Endocrine and metabolic regulation play crucial roles in modulating oxidative stress. Melatonin downregulates the expression of TLR4 and NF-κB, inhibits the production of ROS and RNS, and upregulates the antioxidant defense system (123, 124). In addition, it activates the SIRT3 pathway in mitochondria, protecting them from oxidative stress and alleviating liver dysfunction and glucose metabolism disorders (125, 126). Additionally, melatonin decreases the expression of iNOS mRNA in the livers of septic mice, decreasing nitric oxide (NO) production and protecting the liver (127, 128). Metformin further alleviates liver injury in sepsis models by reducing cytokine levels and high mobility group protein B1 (HMGB1) and MAPK activation while increasing adenosine 5’-monophosphate (AMP)-activated protein kinase (AMPK) expression (129).

4.2.4 Inhibition of pyroptosis

The activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome is a critical step in the pyroptotic process, and its upstream activators have been extensively studied. Mitochondrial ROS and lysosomal damage are two major upstream activators of the NLRP3 inflammasome. Mitochondrial dysfunction during sepsis leads to increased production of ROS, which can trigger the NLRP3 inflammasome (130). Additionally, lysosomal rupture and the release of cathepsins can also activate the NLRP3 inflammasome, contributing to pyroptosis (131).

Targeting pyroptosis is a promising therapeutic strategy for mitigating liver injury in sepsis. Several therapeutic inhibitors of pyroptosis are currently under investigation. Small-molecule inhibitors targeting GSDMD have shown potential in preclinical studies (132). For example, the compound Vx-765 has been reported to inhibit GSDMD cleavage and pyroptosis, thereby reducing inflammation and tissue injury (133–135). Moreover, inhibitors targeting the NLRP3 inflammasome itself are also in development (136). The compound MCC950 is a potent NLRP3 inflammasome inhibitor that has demonstrated efficacy in animal models of sepsis (135, 137). Drug-free tea polyphenols nanoparticles (TPNs) have intrinsic broad-spectrum RONS scavenging and pyroptosis blocking activity, and their ability to inhibit pyroptosis has been clearly demonstrated in a mouse model of sepsis and in human cells (138).

These therapeutic inhibitors provide new avenues for the treatment of sepsis-induced liver injury and warrant further investigation in clinical trials.

4.2.5 Chinese medicine treatment

Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) has already exhibited advantages in the treatment of SILI. The principal TCM active ingredients, curcumin and forskolin, exhibit anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and hepatoprotective effects (36). Ginsenoside Rg3 alleviates SILI by modulating the lncRNA TUG1/miR-200c-3p/SIRT1 signaling axis (139). Moreover, Baweidu powder (BWBDS) ameliorates SILI through the modulation of the gut microbiota in murine models, emphasizing the therapeutic role of the microbiome in hepatic protection (140). Therefore, there is substantial research potential for the use of TCM in treating SILI.

4.2.6 Regulating autophagy

Targeting autophagy pathways has emerged as a promising approach for alleviating SILI. Specific inhibitors of the pyroptosis pathway, such as those that activate peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPARγ), can inhibit the thioredoxin-interacting protein (TXNIP)/NLRP3 signaling pathway (141). Moreover, immune-responsive gene 1 (IRG1)/4-octyl itaconate (OI) regulates the Nrf2 signaling pathway to suppress NLRP3 inflammasome activation and macrophage pyroptosis, reducing acute liver injury in septic mice (142). Furthermore, compounds such as anemonin-B4 and albiflorin increase the expression of autophagy-related proteins via the mTOR/p70S6K signaling pathway (143, 144), whereas dexmedetomidine regulates the SIRT1/AMPK axis (145). Acetaldehyde dehydrogenase-2 (ALDH2) also mediates vital signaling proteins, including AKT, AMPK, mTOR, STAT3, and Notch1, which cooperatively increase the flux of hepatic autophagy and prevent hepatocyte damage (146). These findings provide compelling evidence for the therapeutic potential of autophagy regulation in the treatment of SILI.

4.2.7 Epigenetic treatment

Epigenetic modulation of inflammatory pathways is a promising approach for SILI treatment. Strategies targeting specific miRNAs have been identified to modulate key signaling pathways, such as the NF-κB (87, 147), TLR4 (148), and MAPK (149)pathways. For example, several reports have demonstrated that paclitaxel ameliorates liver injury in septic mice by modulating the miR-27a/TAB3/NF-κB axis (150). The overexpression of miR-103a-3p targets HMGB1, leading to reduced inflammation and cellular damage, thereby improving SILI (151). Moreover, inhibiting miR-155 to promote the expression of suppressor of cytokine signaling (SOCS1) to inhibit the JAK/STAT pathway has been found to decrease SILI (152). The lncRNA CASC9 offers another approach for treating SILI by stabilizing SOCS1 through its interaction with fused in sarcoma (FUS) (153). Additionally, the inhibition of the lncRNA LINC00472 and its regulation of the miR-373-3p/TRIM8 axis has also presented potential benefits in alleviating SILI (154). Silencing the lncRNA XIST reduces BRD4 expression, which evades sepsis-induced acute liver injury, and could serve as a novel biomarker for diagnosing and treating sepsis (155). Although these findings are promising in preclinical models, there is an urgent need for future research to translate these strategies into clinical applications.

4.2.8 Cell therapy

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have garnered significant attention as promising cell-based therapeutic strategies for the treatment of sepsis owing to their wide availability, high self-renewal capacity, multilineage differentiation potential, and low immunogenicity. Studies conducted in animal models have reported that MSCs can prevent liver inflammation during sepsis (156, 157). Human Wharton’s Jelly-derived mesenchymal stem cells (WJ-MSCs) significantly attenuate the expression of NF-κB and cytokines, thereby alleviating SILI in a murine model of sepsis (158). More specifically, MSCs mitigate SILI by suppressing the M1 polarization of KCs (159). In addition to whole MSCs, exosomes derived from MSCs have emerged as an applicable alternative. Exosomes are capable of encapsulating various bioactive molecules, such as RNA, cytokines, chemokines, proteins, and lipids (160). Through paracrine modulation, these exosomes mediate intracellular and intercellular signaling as well as metabolic processes (161). For example, exosomes alleviate sepsis-associated acute liver injury by downregulating MALAT1 via miRNA-26a-5p (162). Nevertheless, two major limitations affecting the clinical application of MSCs include their low efficiency in differentiation and minimal survival rates post transplantation. However, MSC-derived exosomes provide an alternative opportunity to increase therapeutic specificity and precision in treating sepsis while addressing these challenges.

5 Discussion and prospects

Liver injury in sepsis is a complex pathophysiological process. The main factors are inflammatory mediators, oxidative stress, and apoptosis. Although these mechanisms have not been fully elucidated, further studies on the mechanism of SILI may lead to the identification of new therapeutic targets. These discoveries hold promise not only for advancing treatment strategies for septic liver injury but also for enhancing overall management approaches for sepsis.

Otherwise, clinical decision-making can be significantly enriched if further research identifies biomarkers that indicate disease status, predict disease progression, and monitor treatment efficacy. Such biomarkers would prove invaluable in selecting appropriate personalized treatments and optimizing patient outcomes. In parallel, it is essential to develop safe, effective, and accessible treatments that address the diverse needs of patients. The simplification of procedures, reduction in treatment duration, and decreased costs will also further optimize the existing treatment protocols and improve the overall efficacy of interventions for SILI.

Statements

Author contributions

XX: Conceptualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. TY: Writing – review & editing. JA: Writing – review & editing. BL: Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing. ZD: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Project administration, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This work was supported by Gansu Provincial Health Industry Research Program (GSWSKY2023-24), Gansu Provincial Youth Science and Technology Foundation (20JR10RA710), the Foundation of the First Hospital of Lanzhou University (ldyyyn2019-13).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Glossary

  • AKT

    Protein kinase B

  • ALDH

    Acetaldehyde dehydrogenase-2

  • ALP

    Alkaline phosphatase

  • AMPK

    Adenosine 5’-monophosphate (AMP)-activated protein kinase

  • ARDS

    Acute respiratory distress syndrome

  • BWBDS

    Baweidu powder

  • CLP

    Cecal ligation and perforation

  • DAMPs

    Damage-associated molecular patterns

  • DcR3

    Decoy Receptor 3

  • ERK

    Extracellular signal-regulated kinases

  • FOXO

    Forkhead box O

  • FUS

    Fused in sarcoma

  • GGT

    γ-glutamyltransferase

  • GPX4

    Glutathione peroxidase 4

  • GSDMD

    Gasdermin-D

  • HH

    Hypoxic hepatitis

  • HMGB1

    High mobility group protein B1

  • HO-1

    Heme oxygenase-1

  • ICU

    Intensive care unit

  • IFIH1

    Interferon-induced helicase C-domain protein 1

  • IL-1β

    Interleukin-1β

  • IL-6

    Interleukin-6

  • IL-8

    Interleukin-8;INR, International normalized ratio

  • IRG1

    Immune-responsive gene 1

  • JNK

    c-Jun N-terminal kinase

  • KCs

    Kupffer cells

  • LDH

    Lactate dehydrogenase

  • LPSs

    Lipopolysaccharides

  • MAPKs

    Mitogen-activated protein kinases

  • MODS

    Multiple organ dysfunction syndrome

  • MRCP

    Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography

  • MSCs

    Mesenchymal stem cells

  • mTOR

    Mechanistic target of rapamycin

  • NAC

    N-acetylcysteine

  • NF-κB

    Nuclear factor-κB

  • NLRP3

    NOD-like receptor protein 3

  • NO

    Nitric oxide

  • Nrf2

    Nuclear factor E2-related factor 2

  • OI

    4-octyl itaconate

  • PAMPs

    Pathogen-associated molecular patterns

  • PI3K

    Phosphoinositide 3-kinase

  • PPARγ

    Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ

  • PRRs

    Pattern recognition receptors

  • PTBP1

    Polypyrimidine tract-binding protein 1

  • RNS

    Reactive nitrogen species

  • ROS

    Reactive oxygen species

  • SC

    Septic cholestasis

  • SILI

    Sepsis-induced liver injury

  • SIRS

    Systemic inflammatory response syndrome

  • SIRT1

    Silent information regulator 1

  • SOCS1

    Suppressor of cytokine signaling

  • SSC

    Secondary sclerosing cholangitis

  • TCM

    Traditional Chinese medicine

  • TLRs

    Toll-like receptors

  • TNF-α

    Tumor necrosis factor-α

  • TXNIP

    Thioredoxin-interactingprotein

References

  • 1

    SingerMDeutschmanCSSeymourCWShankar-HariMAnnaneDBauerMet al. The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3). Jama. (2016) 315:801–10. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0287

  • 2

    Fleischmann-StruzekCMellhammarLRoseNCassiniARuddKESchlattmannPet al. Incidence and mortality of hospital- and icu-treated sepsis: results from an updated and expanded systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med. (2020) 46:1552–62. doi: 10.1007/s00134-020-06151-x

  • 3

    MarkwartRSaitoHHarderTTomczykSCassiniAFleischmann-StruzekCet al. Epidemiology and burden of sepsis acquired in hospitals and intensive care units: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med. (2020) 46:1536–51. doi: 10.1007/s00134-020-06106-2

  • 4

    SunJZhangJWangXJiFRoncoCTianJet al. Gut-liver crosstalk in sepsis-induced liver injury. Crit Care. (2020) 24:614. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-03327-1

  • 5

    StrnadPTackeFKochATrautweinC. Liver - guardian, modifier and target of sepsis. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. (2017) 14:55–66. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2016.168

  • 6

    YanJLiSLiS. The role of the liver in sepsis. Int Rev Immunol. (2014) 33:498–510. doi: 10.3109/08830185.2014.889129

  • 7

    ChenJWLiuCYLiSWuSWCaiCLuMQ. Sepsis-associated liver injury: mechanisms and potential therapeutic targets. World J Gastroenterol. (2024) 30:4518–22. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v30.i42.4518

  • 8

    JonsdottirSArnardottirMBAndressonJABjornssonHKLundSHBjornssonES. Prevalence, clinical characteristics and outcomes of hypoxic hepatitis in critically ill patients. Scand J Gastroenterol. (2022) 57:311–8. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2021.2005136

  • 9

    KasperPTackeFSteffenHMMichelsG. Hepatic dysfunction in sepsis. Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. (2020) 115:609–19. doi: 10.1007/s00063-020-00707-x

  • 10

    BynumTEBoitnottJKMaddreyWC. Ischemic hepatitis. Dig Dis Sci. (1979) 24:129–35. doi: 10.1007/bf01324740

  • 11

    HenrionJSchapiraMLuwaertRColinLDelannoyAHellerFR. Hypoxic hepatitis: clinical and hemodynamic study in 142 consecutive cases. Medicine. (2003) 82:392–406. doi: 10.1097/01.md.0000101573.54295.bd

  • 12

    AboelsoudMMJavaidAIAl-QadiMOLewisJH. Hypoxic hepatitis - its biochemical profile, causes and risk factors of mortality in critically-ill patients: A cohort study of 565 patients. J Crit Care. (2017) 41:9–15. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.04.040

  • 13

    BeyerDHoffJSommerfeldOZipprichAGaßlerNPressAT. The liver in sepsis: molecular mechanism of liver failure and their potential for clinical translation. Mol Med. (2022) 28:84. doi: 10.1186/s10020-022-00510-8

  • 14

    GhenuMIDragoşDManeaMMIonescuDNegreanuL. Pathophysiology of sepsis-induced cholestasis: A review. JGH Open. (2022) 6:378–87. doi: 10.1002/jgh3.12771

  • 15

    HorvatitsTDrolzATraunerMFuhrmannV. Liver injury and failure in critical illness. Hepatology. (2019) 70:2204–15. doi: 10.1002/hep.30824

  • 16

    KobashiHToshimoriJYamamotoK. Sepsis-associated liver injury: incidence, classification and the clinical significance. Hepatol Res. (2013) 43:255–66. doi: 10.1111/j.1872-034X.2012.01069.x

  • 17

    MartinsPVerdelho MaChadoM. Secondary sclerosing cholangitis in critically ill patients: an underdiagnosed entity. GE - Portuguese J Gastroenterol. (2019) 27:103–14. doi: 10.1159/000501405

  • 18

    ZhaoJYuePMiNLiMFuWZhangXet al. Biliary fibrosis is an important but neglected pathological feature in hepatobiliary disorders: from molecular mechanisms to clinical implications. Med Rev (2021). (2024) 4:326–65. doi: 10.1515/mr-2024-0029

  • 19

    LeonhardtSVeltzke-SchliekerWAdlerASchottEHetzerRSchaffartzikWet al. Trigger mechanisms of secondary sclerosing cholangitis in critically ill patients. Crit Care. (2015) 19:131. doi: 10.1186/s13054-015-0861-5

  • 20

    MöllerKBradenBCulverELJenssenCZadehESAlhyariAet al. Secondary sclerosing cholangitis and igg4-sclerosing cholangitis - a review of cholangiographic and ultrasound imaging. Endosc Ultrasound. (2023) 12:181–99. doi: 10.4103/eus-d-22-00208

  • 21

    LeonhardtSVeltzke-SchliekerWAdlerASchottEEurichDFaberWet al. Secondary sclerosing cholangitis in critically ill patients: clinical presentation, cholangiographic features, natural history, and outcome: A series of 16 cases. Med (Baltimore). (2015) 94:e2188. doi: 10.1097/md.0000000000002188

  • 22

    HentschelFBornscheuerTLüthS. Secondary cholangitis of the critically ill. Z Gastroenterol. (2019) 57:977–82. doi: 10.1055/a-0958-2843

  • 23

    LinHLiangQCaiQHuangM. Analysis of high-risk factors and clinical characteristics of sepsis-related liver injury. Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. (2021) 33:186–91. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20201118-00627

  • 24

    LiPChangM. Roles of prr-mediated signaling pathways in the regulation of oxidative stress and inflammatory diseases. Int J Mol Sci. (2021) 22(14):7688. doi: 10.3390/ijms22147688

  • 25

    WangHMaTBaoQZhuLYingTYuY. Knockdown of protein interacting with C A Kinase 1 aggravates sepsis-induced acute liver injury by regulating the tlr4/nf-Kb pathway. Sci Rep. (2023) 13:11913. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-38852-w

  • 26

    GandhiCR. Pro- and anti-fibrogenic functions of gram-negative bacterial lipopolysaccharide in the liver. Front Med (Lausanne). (2020) 7:130. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2020.00130

  • 27

    MedzhitovRPreston-HurlburtP. Janeway CA, jr. A human homologue of the drosophila toll protein signals activation of adaptive immunity. Nature. (1997) 388:394–7. doi: 10.1038/41131

  • 28

    KumarV. Toll-like receptors in sepsis-associated cytokine storm and their endogenous negative regulators as future immunomodulatory targets. Int Immunopharmacol. (2020) 89:107087. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2020.107087

  • 29

    KarkiRKannegantiTD. The ‘Cytokine storm’: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic prospects. Trends Immunol. (2021) 42:681–705. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2021.06.001

  • 30

    SundaramBTweedellREPrasanth KumarSKannegantiTD. The nlr family of innate immune and cell death sensors. Immunity. (2024) 57:674–99. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2024.03.012

  • 31

    GoldenGJToledoAGMarkiASorrentinoJTMorrisCRileyRJet al. Endothelial heparan sulfate mediates hepatic neutrophil trafficking and injury during staphylococcus aureus sepsis. mBio. (2021) 12:e0118121. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01181-21

  • 32

    AlvesGFAimarettiEEinaudiGMastrocolaRde OliveiraJGCollottaDet al. Pharmacological inhibition of fak-pyk2 pathway protects against organ damage and prolongs the survival of septic mice. Front Immunol. (2022) 13:837180. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.837180

  • 33

    NagarHPiaoSKimCS. Role of mitochondrial oxidative stress in sepsis. Acute Crit Care. (2018) 33:65–72. doi: 10.4266/acc.2018.00157

  • 34

    ZuoLPratherERStetskivMGarrisonDEMeadeJRPeaceTIet al. Inflammaging and oxidative stress in human diseases: from molecular mechanisms to novel treatments. Int J Mol Sci. (2019) 20(18):4472. doi: 10.3390/ijms20184472

  • 35

    JakubczykKDecKKałduńskaJKawczugaDKochmanJJandaK. Reactive oxygen species - sources, functions, oxidative damage. Pol Merkur Lekarski. (2020) 48:124–7. doi: 10.1155/2012/217037

  • 36

    SrdićTĐuraševićSLakićIRužičićAVujovićPJevđovićTet al. From molecular mechanisms to clinical therapy: understanding sepsis-induced multiple organ dysfunction. Int J Mol Sci. (2024) 25(14):7770. doi: 10.3390/ijms25147770

  • 37

    ChenWKimSKimSYBeheshtianCKimNShinKHet al. Gv1001, htert peptide fragment, prevents doxorubicin-induced endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition in human endothelial cells and atherosclerosis in mice. Cells. (2025) 14(2):98. doi: 10.3390/cells14020098

  • 38

    SouzaACPSouzaCMAmaralCLLemesSFSantucciLFMilanskiMet al. Short-term high-fat diet consumption reduces hypothalamic expression of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor A7 subunit (A7nachr) and affects the anti-inflammatory response in a mouse model of sepsis. Front Immunol. (2019) 10:565. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.00565

  • 39

    SundaramBPandianNKimHJAbdelaalHMMallRIndariOet al. Nlrc5 senses nad(+) depletion, forming a panoptosome and driving panoptosis and inflammation. Cell. (2024) 187:4061–77.e17. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2024.05.034

  • 40

    KantarjianHHaddadFGJainNSasakiKShortNJLoghaviSet al. Results of salvage therapy with mini-hyper-cvd and inotuzumab ozogamicin with or without blinatumomab in pre-B acute lymphoblastic leukemia. J Hematol Oncol. (2023) 16:44. doi: 10.1186/s13045-023-01444-2

  • 41

    MelinNYarahmadovTSanchez-TaltavullDBirrerFEBrodieTMPetitBet al. A new mouse model of radiation-induced liver disease reveals mitochondrial dysfunction as an underlying fibrotic stimulus. JHEP Rep. (2022) 4:100508. doi: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2022.100508

  • 42

    SunWLiuJShiXBiYLiuHXuT. Emamectin benzoate and microplastics led to skeletal muscle atrophy in common carp via induced oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, and protein synthesis and degradation imbalance. J Agric Food Chem. (2025) 73(5):3106–16. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.4c10479

  • 43

    LelubreCVincentJL. Mechanisms and treatment of organ failure in sepsis. Nat Rev Nephrol. (2018) 14:417–27. doi: 10.1038/s41581-018-0005-7

  • 44

    PrauchnerCA. Oxidative stress in sepsis: pathophysiological implications justifying antioxidant co-therapy. Burns. (2017) 43:471–85. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2016.09.023

  • 45

    GalleyHF. Oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction in sepsis. Br J Anaesth. (2011) 107:57–64. doi: 10.1093/bja/aer093

  • 46

    VanhorebeekIDe VosRMesottenDWoutersPJDe-Wolf-PeetersCVan den BergheG. Protection of hepatocyte mitochondrial ultrastructure and function by strict blood glucose control with insulin in critically ill patients. Lancet. (2005) 365:53–9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17665-4

  • 47

    MarchettiPCastedoMSusinSAZamzamiNHirschTMachoAet al. Mitochondrial permeability transition is a central coordinating event of apoptosis. J Exp Med. (1996) 184:1155–60. doi: 10.1084/jem.184.3.1155

  • 48

    GloverHLSchreinerADewsonGTaitSWG. Mitochondria and cell death. Nat Cell Biol. (2024) 26:1434–46. doi: 10.1038/s41556-024-01429-4

  • 49

    ShimizuSNaritaMTsujimotoY. Bcl-2 family proteins regulate the release of apoptogenic cytochrome C by the mitochondrial channel vdac. Nature. (1999) 399:483–7. doi: 10.1038/20959

  • 50

    ZhouJZhengXXiCTangXJiangYXieMet al. Cr(Vi) induced hepatocyte apoptosis through the cth/H(2)S/drp1 signaling pathway. Sci Total Environ. (2024) 950:175332. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.175332

  • 51

    LeeHLeeTJGallowayCAZhiWXiaoWde Mesy BentleyKLet al. The mitochondrial fusion protein opa1 is dispensable in the liver and its absence induces mitohormesis to protect liver from drug-induced injury. Nat Commun. (2023) 14:6721. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-42564-0

  • 52

    WenRLiuYPTongXXZhangTNYangN. Molecular mechanisms and functions of pyroptosis in sepsis and sepsis-associated organ dysfunction. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. (2022) 12:962139. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.962139

  • 53

    LiuLLYanXXueKYWangXMLiLYChenHYet al. Prim-O-glucosycimifugin attenuates liver injury in septic mice by inhibiting nlrp3 inflammasome/caspase-1 signaling cascades in macrophages. Phytomedicine. (2022) 106:154427. doi: 10.1016/j.phymed.2022.154427

  • 54

    ShiJZhaoYWangKShiXWangYHuangHet al. Cleavage of gsdmd by inflammatory caspases determines pyroptotic cell death. Nature. (2015) 526:660–5. doi: 10.1038/nature15514

  • 55

    KesavardhanaSKannegantiTD. Mechanisms governing inflammasome activation, assembly and pyroptosis induction. Int Immunol. (2017) 29:201–10. doi: 10.1093/intimm/dxx018

  • 56

    HuangYXuWZhouR. Nlrp3 inflammasome activation and cell death. Cell Mol Immunol. (2021) 18:2114–27. doi: 10.1038/s41423-021-00740-6

  • 57

    LiuLLinLWangYYanXLiRHeMet al. L-ap alleviates liver injury in septic mice by inhibiting macrophage activation via suppressing nf-Kb and nlrp3 inflammasome/caspase-1 signal pathways. J Agric Food Chem. (2024) 72:8460–75. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.3c02781

  • 58

    WangYZhaoYWangZSunRZouBLiRet al. Peroxiredoxin 3 inhibits acetaminophen-induced liver pyroptosis through the regulation of mitochondrial ros. Front Immunol. (2021) 12:652782. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.652782

  • 59

    ZhenHHuYLiuXFanGZhaoS. The protease caspase-1: activation pathways and functions. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. (2024) 717:149978. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2024.149978

  • 60

    WilsonKPBlackJAThomsonJAKimEEGriffithJPNaviaMAet al. Structure and mechanism of interleukin-1 beta converting enzyme. Nature. (1994) 370:270–5. doi: 10.1038/370270a0

  • 61

    ThornberryNABullHGCalaycayJRChapmanKTHowardADKosturaMJet al. A novel heterodimeric cysteine protease is required for interleukin-1 beta processing in monocytes. Nature. (1992) 356:768–74. doi: 10.1038/356768a0

  • 62

    ChanAHSchroderK. Inflammasome signaling and regulation of interleukin-1 family cytokines. J Exp Med. (2020) 217(1):e20190314. doi: 10.1084/jem.20190314

  • 63

    RuanJXiaSLiuXLiebermanJWuH. Cryo-em structure of the gasdermin A3 membrane pore. Nature. (2018) 557:62–7. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0058-6

  • 64

    YuGChoiYKLeeS. Inflammasome diversity: exploring novel frontiers in the innate immune response. Trends Immunol. (2024) 45:248–58. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2024.02.004

  • 65

    XiaSZhangZMagupalliVGPabloJLDongYVoraSMet al. Gasdermin D pore structure reveals preferential release of mature interleukin-1. Nature. (2021) 593:607–11. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03478-3

  • 66

    EvavoldCLRuanJTanYXiaSWuHKaganJC. The pore-forming protein gasdermin D regulates interleukin-1 secretion from living macrophages. Immunity. (2018) 48:35–44.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2017.11.013

  • 67

    FinkSLCooksonBT. Caspase-1-dependent pore formation during pyroptosis leads to osmotic lysis of infected host macrophages. Cell Microbiol. (2006) 8:1812–25. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2006.00751.x

  • 68

    WangGJinSLingXLiYHuYZhangYet al. Proteomic profiling of lps-induced macrophage-derived exosomes indicates their involvement in acute liver injury. Proteomics. (2019) 19:e1800274. doi: 10.1002/pmic.201800274

  • 69

    KayagakiNWarmingSLamkanfiMVande WalleLLouieSDongJet al. Non-canonical inflammasome activation targets caspase-11. Nature. (2011) 479:117–21. doi: 10.1038/nature10558

  • 70

    Gómez-VirgilioLSilva-LuceroMDFlores-MorelosDSGallardo-NietoJLopez-ToledoGAbarca-FernandezAMet al. Autophagy: A key regulator of homeostasis and disease: an overview of molecular mechanisms and modulators. Cells. (2022) 11(15):2262. doi: 10.3390/cells11152262

  • 71

    OnishiMYamanoKSatoMMatsudaNOkamotoK. Molecular mechanisms and physiological functions of mitophagy. EMBO J. (2021) 40:e104705. doi: 10.15252/embj.2020104705

  • 72

    ZhouJ-CWangJ-LRenH-ZShiX-L. Autophagy plays a double-edged sword role in liver diseases. J Physiol Biochem. (2022) 78:9–17. doi: 10.1007/s13105-021-00844-7

  • 73

    KillackeySAPhilpottDJGirardinSE. Mitophagy pathways in health and disease. J Cell Biol. (2020) 219(11):e202004029. doi: 10.1083/jcb.202004029

  • 74

    NarendraDTanakaASuenDFYouleRJ. Parkin is recruited selectively to impaired mitochondria and promotes their autophagy. J Cell Biol. (2008) 183:795–803. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200809125

  • 75

    YamadaTMurataDAdachiYItohKKameokaSIgarashiAet al. Mitochondrial stasis reveals P62-mediated ubiquitination in parkin-independent mitophagy and mitigates nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Cell Metab. (2018) 28:588–604.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2018.06.014

  • 76

    GaoFChenDSiJHuQQinZFangMet al. The mitochondrial protein bnip3l is the substrate of park2 and mediates mitophagy in pink1/park2 pathway. Hum Mol Genet. (2015) 24:2528–38. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddv017

  • 77

    LinC-WLoSPerngD-SWuDB-CLeeP-HChangY-Fet al. Complete activation of autophagic process attenuates liver injury and improves survival in septic mice. Shock. (2014) 41:241–9. doi: 10.1097/shk.0000000000000111

  • 78

    IbaTHelmsJMaierCLFerrerRLevyJH. Autophagy and autophagic cell death in sepsis: friend or foe? J Intensive Care. (2024) 12:41. doi: 10.1186/s40560-024-00754-y

  • 79

    WangHZhuJWeiLWuSShangLYeXet al. Tslp protects against sepsis-induced liver injury by inducing autophagy via activation of the pi3k/akt/stat3 pathway. Pathol Res Pract. (2022) 236:153979. doi: 10.1016/j.prp.2022.153979

  • 80

    BinnieATsangJLYHuPCarrasqueiroGCastelo-BrancoPdos SantosCC. Epigenetics of sepsis. Crit Care Med. (2020) 48:745–56. doi: 10.1097/ccm.0000000000004247

  • 81

    IsacTIsacSRababocRCotorogeaMIliescuL. Epigenetics in inflammatory liver diseases: A clinical perspective (Review). Exp Ther Med. (2022) 23:366. doi: 10.3892/etm.2022.11293

  • 82

    ZhengZHuangGGaoTHuangTZouMZouYet al. Epigenetic changes associated with interleukin-10. Front Immunol. (2020) 11. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.01105

  • 83

    WuDShiYZhangHMiaoC. Epigenetic mechanisms of immune remodeling in sepsis: targeting histone modification. Cell Death Dis. (2023) 14:112. doi: 10.1038/s41419-023-05656-9

  • 84

    PanYWangJXueYZhaoJLiDZhangSet al. Gskj4 Protects Mice against Early Sepsis Via Reducing Proinflammatory Factors and up-Regulating Mir-146a. Front Immunol. (2018) 9:2272. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.02272

  • 85

    von KnethenABrüneB. Histone deacetylation inhibitors as therapy concept in sepsis. Int J Mol Sci. (2019) 20:346. doi: 10.3390/ijms20020346

  • 86

    . !!! INVALID CITATION!!!.

  • 87

    YangZBChenWWChenHPCaiSXLinJDQiuLZ. Mir-155 aggravated septic liver injury by oxidative stress-mediated er stress and mitochondrial dysfunction via targeting nrf-2. Exp Mol Pathol. (2018) 105:387–94. doi: 10.1016/j.yexmp.2018.09.003

  • 88

    LiYSongJXieZLiuMSunK. Long noncoding rna colorectal neoplasia differentially expressed alleviates sepsis-induced liver injury via regulating mir-126-5p. IUBMB Life. (2020) 72:440–51. doi: 10.1002/iub.2230

  • 89

    RahmelTSchäferSTFreyUHAdamzikMPetersJ. Increased circulating microrna-122 is a biomarker for discrimination and risk stratification in patients defined by sepsis-3 criteria. PloS One. (2018) 13:e0197637. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197637

  • 90

    DaiYLiangZLiYLiCChenL. Circulating long noncoding rnas as potential biomarkers of sepsis: A preliminary study. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers. (2017) 21:649–57. doi: 10.1089/gtmb.2017.0061

  • 91

    ZhangCCNiuF. Lncrna neat1 promotes inflammatory response in sepsis-induced liver injury via the let-7a/tlr4 axis. Int Immunopharmacol. (2019) 75:105731. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2019.105731

  • 92

    YangZXiaHLaiJQiuLLinJ. Artesunate alleviates sepsis-induced liver injury by regulating macrophage polarization via the lncrna malat1/ptbp1/ifih1 axis. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. (2024) 110:116383. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2024.116383

  • 93

    YangYTianTLiSLiNLuoHJiangY. Lncrna 220: A novel long non-coding rna regulates autophagy and apoptosis in kupffer cells via the mir-5101/pi3k/akt/mtor axis in lps-induced endotoxemic liver injury in mice. Int J Mol Sci. (2023) 24(13):11210. doi: 10.3390/ijms241311210

  • 94

    SunCChenYChenZWangHYangWZhouX. Lncrna casc7 contributes to the progression of lps-induced liver injury by targeting mirna-217/tlr4 axis. Biomol BioMed. (2024). 25(2):493–504. doi: 10.17305/bb.2024.10543

  • 95

    YangYWangAZhouJYangYWuH. Lncrna snhg11 induces ferroptosis in liver injury cells through mir-324-3p/gpx4 axis-mediated sepsis. Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand). (2023) 69:163–9. doi: 10.14715/cmb/2023.69.12.26

  • 96

    KangKLiNGaoYWangCChenPMengXet al. Circ-katnal1 enhances inflammatory pyroptosis in sepsis-induced liver injury through the mir-31-5p/gsdmd axis. Mediators Inflammation. (2022) 2022:8950130. doi: 10.1155/2022/8950130

  • 97

    LiHChenXXuJZhuLLiCSunXet al. Grp/grpr enhances alcohol-associated liver injury through the irf1-mediated caspase-1 inflammasome and nox2-dependent ros pathway. Hepatology. (2024) 79:392–408. doi: 10.1097/hep.0000000000000531

  • 98

    GhiboubMZhaoJLi YimAYFSchilderinkRVerseijdenCvan HamersveldPHPet al. Hdac3 mediates the inflammatory response and lps tolerance in human monocytes and macrophages. Front Immunol. (2020) 11:550769. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.550769

  • 99

    HaiLFriedelDHinzFHoffmannDCDoubrovinskaiaSRohdjessHet al. Distinct epigenetic and transcriptional profiles of epstein-barr virus (Ebv) positive and negative primary cns lymphomas. Neuro Oncol. (2024). doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noae251

  • 100

    ShiPDuYZhangYYangBGuanQJingYet al. Ubiquitin-independent degradation of bim blocks macrophage pyroptosis in sepsis-related tissue injury. Cell Death Dis. (2024) 15:703. doi: 10.1038/s41419-024-07072-z

  • 101

    TruongNCottinghamALDharmarajSShawJRLasolaJJMGoodisCCet al. Multimodal nanoparticle-containing modified suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid polymer conjugates to mitigate immune dysfunction in severe inflammation. Bioeng Transl Med. (2024) 9:e10611. doi: 10.1002/btm2.10611

  • 102

    SamantaSZhouZRajasinghSPandaASampathVRajasinghJ. Dnmt and hdac inhibitors together abrogate endotoxemia mediated macrophage death by stat3-jmjd3 signaling. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. (2018) 102:117–27. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2018.07.002

  • 103

    HeXLChenJYFengYLSongPWongYKXieLLet al. Single-cell rna sequencing deciphers the mechanism of sepsis-induced liver injury and the therapeutic effects of artesunate. Acta Pharmacol Sin. (2023) 44:1801–14. doi: 10.1038/s41401-023-01065-y

  • 104

    DurandFKellumJANadimMK. Fluid resuscitation in patients with cirrhosis and sepsis: A multidisciplinary perspective. J Hepatol. (2023) 79:240–6. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2023.02.024

  • 105

    XuFLuGWangJ. Enhancing sepsis therapy: the evolving role of enteral nutrition. Front Nutr. (2024) 11:1421632. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1421632

  • 106

    PapamichalisPOikonomouKGXanthoudakiMValsamakiASkouraALPapathanasiouSKet al. Extracorporeal organ support for critically ill patients: overcoming the past, achieving the maximum at present, and redefining the future. World J Crit Care Med. (2024) 13:92458. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v13.i2.92458

  • 107

    HuberWRuiz de GaribayAP. Options in extracorporeal support of multiple organ failure. Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. (2020) 115:28–36. doi: 10.1007/s00063-020-00658-3

  • 108

    LuYShiYWuQSunXZhangWZXuXLet al. An overview of drug delivery nanosystems for sepsis-related liver injury treatment. Int J Nanomedicine. (2023) 18:765–79. doi: 10.2147/ijn.S394802

  • 109

    MareyAMDkhilMAAbdel MoneimAASantourlidisSAbdel-GaberRAlquraishiMIet al. Fighting sepsis-induced liver damage with biosynthesized silver nanoparticles. Microsc Res Tech. (2024). 88(1):127–38. doi: 10.1002/jemt.24691

  • 110

    XiaoYRenCChenGShangPSongXYouGet al. Neutrophil membrane-mimicking nanodecoys with intrinsic anti-inflammatory properties alleviate sepsis-induced acute liver injury and lethality in a mouse endotoxemia model. Mater Today Bio. (2022) 14:100244. doi: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100244

  • 111

    XuYLiYLiuXPanYSunZXueYet al. Spions enhances il-10-producing macrophages to relieve sepsis via cav1-notch1/hes1-mediated autophagy. Int J Nanomedicine. (2019) 14:6779–97. doi: 10.2147/ijn.S215055

  • 112

    ZainiAJawadHEHadiNR. Targeting vegf using bevacizumab attenuates sepsis-induced liver injury in a mouse model of cecal ligation and puncture. J Med Life. (2023) 16:1488–98. doi: 10.25122/jml-2023-0064

  • 113

    WahabFTazinafoLFCárnioECAguilaFABatalhãoMERochaMJ. Interleukin-1 receptor antagonist decreases cerebrospinal fluid nitric oxide levels and increases vasopressin secretion in the late phase of sepsis in rats. Endocrine. (2015) 49:215–21. doi: 10.1007/s12020-014-0452-2

  • 114

    ShakooryBCarcilloJAChathamWWAmdurRLZhaoHDinarelloCAet al. Interleukin-1 receptor blockade is associated with reduced mortality in sepsis patients with features of macrophage activation syndrome: reanalysis of a prior phase iii trial. Crit Care Med. (2016) 44:275–81. doi: 10.1097/ccm.0000000000001402

  • 115

    SuJTongZFengZWuSZhouFLiRet al. Protective effects of dcr3-sumo on lipopolysaccharide-induced inflammatory cells and septic mice. Int J Biol Macromol. (2024) 275:133703. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.133703

  • 116

    ChenMZhangYWangYGulifeireTYuX. Role and mechanism of sirt1 in regulating nrf2/ho-1 signaling pathway in septic liver injury. Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. (2023) 35:598–603. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20220815-00744

  • 117

    XiaoWOldhamWMPrioloCPandeyAKLoscalzoJ. Immunometabolic endothelial phenotypes: integrating inflammation and glucose metabolism. Circ Res. (2021) 129:9–29. doi: 10.1161/circresaha.120.318805

  • 118

    ZhangMSuiWXingYChengJChengCXueFet al. Angiotensin iv attenuates diabetic cardiomyopathy via suppressing foxo1-induced excessive autophagy, apoptosis and fibrosis. Theranostics. (2021) 11:8624–39. doi: 10.7150/thno.48561

  • 119

    LeeYJeongGSKimKMLeeWBaeJS. Cudratricusxanthone a attenuates sepsis-induced liver injury via sirt1 signaling. J Cell Physiol. (2018) 233:5441–6. doi: 10.1002/jcp.26390

  • 120

    XuDLiaoSLvYWangJKongL. Nmr-based metabolomics approach reveals effects of antioxidant nutrients in sepsis-induced changes in rat liver injury. J Nutr Biochem. (2020) 85:108440. doi: 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2020.108440

  • 121

    Aisa-AlvarezASotoMEGuarner-LansVCamarena-AlejoGFranco-GranilloJMartínez-RodríguezEAet al. Usefulness of antioxidants as adjuvant therapy for septic shock: A randomized clinical trial. Medicina (Kaunas). (2020) 56(11):619. doi: 10.3390/medicina56110619

  • 122

    NabiTNabiSRafiqNShahA. Role of N-acetylcysteine treatment in non-acetaminophen-induced acute liver failure: A prospective study. Saudi J Gastroenterol. (2017) 23:169–75. doi: 10.4103/1319-3767.207711

  • 123

    SahaMMannaKDas SahaK. Melatonin suppresses nlrp3 inflammasome activation via tlr4/nf-Kb and P2x7r signaling in high-fat diet-induced murine nash model. J Inflammation Res. (2022) 15:3235–58. doi: 10.2147/jir.S343236

  • 124

    ZhangJ-JMengXLiYZhouYXuD-PLiSet al. Effects of melatonin on liver injuries and diseases. Int J Mol Sci. (2017) 18:673. doi: 10.3390/ijms18040673

  • 125

    Colunga BiancatelliRMLBerrillMMohammedYHMarikPE. Melatonin for the treatment of sepsis: the scientific rationale. J Thorac Dis. (2020) 12:S54–s65. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2019.12.85

  • 126

    ChenJXiaHZhangLZhangHWangDTaoX. Protective effects of melatonin on sepsis-induced liver injury and dysregulation of gluconeogenesis in rats through activating sirt1/stat3 pathway. BioMed Pharmacother. (2019) 117:109150. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2019.109150

  • 127

    CrespoEMacíasMPozoDEscamesGMartínMVivesFet al. Melatonin inhibits expression of the inducible no synthase ii in liver and lung and prevents endotoxemia in lipopolysaccharide-induced multiple organ dysfunction syndrome in rats. FASEB J. (1999) 13:1537–46. doi: 10.1096/fasebj.13.12.1537

  • 128

    TaroccoACarocciaNMorcianoGWieckowskiMRAncoraGGaraniGet al. Melatonin as a master regulator of cell death and inflammation: molecular mechanisms and clinical implications for newborn care. Cell Death Dis. (2019) 10:317. doi: 10.1038/s41419-019-1556-7

  • 129

    SongHZhangXZhaiRLiangHSongGYuanYet al. Metformin attenuated sepsis-associated liver injury and inflammatory response in aged mice. Bioengineered. (2022) 13:4598–609. doi: 10.1080/21655979.2022.2036305

  • 130

    GuoNKSiLNLiPQGanGF. Nano acacetin mitigates intestinal mucosal injury in sepsis rats by protecting mitochondrial function and regulating trx1 to inhibit the nlrp3 pyroptosis pathway. Int J Nanomedicine. (2024) 19:14125–41. doi: 10.2147/ijn.S497081

  • 131

    NiuZXiaXZhangZLiuJLiX. (H)Ceo(2)@Ca-074me nanoparticles alleviate inflammation and improve osteogenic microenvironment by regulating the ctsb-nlrp3 signaling pathway. Int J Nanomedicine. (2025) 20:161–79. doi: 10.2147/ijn.S389156

  • 132

    WrightSSKumariPFraile-ÁgredaVWangCShivcharanSKappelhoffSet al. Transplantation of gasdermin pores by extracellular vesicles propagates pyroptosis to bystander cells. Cell. (2024) 188(2):280–291.e17. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2024.11.018

  • 133

    LiMWangYLiuHHuangXPengHYangYet al. Staphylococcus aureus membrane vesicles kill tumor cells through a caspase-1-dependent pyroptosis pathway. Int J Nanomedicine. (2024) 19:4007–19. doi: 10.2147/ijn.S455158

  • 134

    JiaoMWangJLiuWZhaoXQinYZhangCet al. Vx-765 inhibits pyroptosis and reduces inflammation to prevent acute liver failure by upregulating pparα Expression. Ann Hepatol. (2023) 28:101082. doi: 10.1016/j.aohep.2023.101082

  • 135

    YeXLinZ-JHongG-HWangZ-MDouR-TLinJ-Yet al. Pyroptosis inhibitors mcc950 and vx-765 mitigate myocardial injury by alleviating oxidative stress, inflammation, and apoptosis in acute myocardial hypoxia. Exp Cell Res. (2024) 438:114061. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2024.114061

  • 136

    CollRCSchroderK. Inflammasome components as new therapeutic targets in inflammatory disease. Nat Rev Immunol. (2025) 25:22–41. doi: 10.1038/s41577-024-01075-9

  • 137

    LaiYZhuangLZhuJWangSGuoCChenBet al. Novel approach to alleviate lupus nephritis: targeting the nlrp3 inflammasome in cd8(+)Cd69(+)Cd103(+) T(Rm) cells. J Transl Med. (2024) 22:1139. doi: 10.1186/s12967-024-05951-9

  • 138

    ChenYLuoRLiJWangSDingJZhaoKet al. Intrinsic radical species scavenging activities of tea polyphenols nanoparticles block pyroptosis in endotoxin-induced sepsis. ACS Nano. (2022) 16:2429–41. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.1c08913

  • 139

    WuPYuXPengYWangQLDengLTXingW. Ginsenoside rg3 alleviates septic liver injury by regulating the lncrna tug1/mir-200c-3p/sirt1 axis. J Inflammation (Lond). (2021) 18:31. doi: 10.1186/s12950-021-00296-2

  • 140

    FanXMaiCZuoLHuangJXieCJiangZet al. Herbal formula baweibaidusan alleviates polymicrobial sepsis-induced liver injury via increasing the gut microbiota lactobacillus johnsonii and regulating macrophage anti-inflammatory activity in mice. Acta Pharm Sin B. (2023) 13:1164–79. doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2022.10.016

  • 141

    LiZLiuTFengYTongYJiaYWangCet al. Pparγ Alleviates sepsis-induced liver injury by inhibiting hepatocyte pyroptosis via inhibition of the ros/txnip/nlrp3 signaling pathway. Oxid Med Cell Longev. (2022) 2022:1269747. doi: 10.1155/2022/1269747

  • 142

    ZhouPYangLLiRYinYXieGLiuXet al. Irg1/itaconate alleviates acute liver injury in septic mice by suppressing nlrp3 expression and its mediated macrophage pyroptosis via regulation of the nrf2 pathway. Int Immunopharmacol. (2024) 135:112277. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2024.112277

  • 143

    PeiLHeL. Hepatoprotective Effect of Anemoside B4 against Sepsis-Induced Acute Liver Injury through Modulating the Mtor/P70s6k-Mediated Autophagy. Chem Biol Interact. (2021) 345:109534. doi: 10.1016/j.cbi.2021.109534

  • 144

    LiuYFengLYaoL. Albiflorin alleviates sepsis-induced acute liver injury through mtor/P70s6k pathway. Curr Mol Med. (2024) 24:344–54. doi: 10.2174/1566524023666230309124004

  • 145

    YuQZouLYuanXFangFXuF. Dexmedetomidine Protects against Septic Liver Injury by Enhancing Autophagy through Activation of the Ampk/Sirt1 Signaling Pathway. Front Pharmacol. (2021) 12:658677. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.658677

  • 146

    LiuZYeSZhongXWangWLaiCHYangWet al. Pretreatment with the aldh2 activator alda−1 protects rat livers from ischemia/reperfusion injury by inducing autophagy. Mol Med Rep. (2020) 22:2373–85. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2020.11312

  • 147

    FunahashiYKatoNMasudaTNishioFKitaiHIshimotoTet al. Mir-146a targeted to splenic macrophages prevents sepsis-induced multiple organ injury. Lab Invest. (2019) 99:1130–42. doi: 10.1038/s41374-019-0190-4

  • 148

    XuXBuBTianHWuRYangJ. Micrornas combined with the tlr4/tdag8 mrnas and proinflammatory cytokines are biomarkers for the rapid diagnosis of sepsis. Mol Med Rep. (2022) 26(5):334. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2022.12850

  • 149

    CuiSNiuKXieYLiSZhuWYuLet al. Screening of potential key ferroptosis-related genes in sepsis. PeerJ. (2022) 10:e13983. doi: 10.7717/peerj.13983

  • 150

    YangQZhangDLiYLiYLiY. Paclitaxel alleviated liver injury of septic mice by alleviating inflammatory response via microrna-27a/tab3/nf-Kb signaling pathway. BioMed Pharmacother. (2018) 97:1424–33. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2017.11.003

  • 151

    ChenLLuQDengFPengSYuanJLiuCet al. Mir-103a-3p could attenuate sepsis-induced liver injury by targeting hmgb1. Inflammation. (2020) 43:2075–86. doi: 10.1007/s10753-020-01275-0

  • 152

    LvXZhangYCuiYRenYLiRRongQ. Inhibition of microrna−155 relieves sepsis−Induced liver injury through inactivating the jak/stat pathway. Mol Med Rep. (2015) 12:6013–8. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2015.4188

  • 153

    BaiJChenS. Lncrna casc9 enhances the stability of socs-1 by combining with fus to alleviate sepsis-induced liver injury. Cytokine. (2023) 171:156346. doi: 10.1016/j.cyto.2023.156346

  • 154

    LiLHeYHeXJBiMRQiYHZhuWW. Down-regulation of long noncoding rna linc00472 alleviates sepsis-induced acute hepatic injury by regulating mir-373-3p/trim8 axis. Exp Mol Pathol. (2020) 117:104562. doi: 10.1016/j.yexmp.2020.104562

  • 155

    ShenCLiJ. Lncrna xist silencing protects against sepsis-induced acute liver injury via inhibition of brd4 expression. Inflammation. (2021) 44:194–205. doi: 10.1007/s10753-020-01321-x

  • 156

    YagiHSoto-GutierrezAKitagawaYTillesAWTompkinsRGYarmushML. Bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells attenuate organ injury induced by lps and burn. Cell Transplant. (2010) 19:823–30. doi: 10.3727/096368910x508942

  • 157

    LiuYRenHWangJYangFLiJZhouYet al. Prostaglandin E(2) secreted by mesenchymal stem cells protects against acute liver failure via enhancing hepatocyte proliferation. FASEB J. (2019) 33:2514–25. doi: 10.1096/fj.201801349RR

  • 158

    CóndorJMRodriguesCESousa MoreiraRCanaleDVolpiniRAShimizuMHet al. Treatment with human wharton’s jelly-derived mesenchymal stem cells attenuates sepsis-induced kidney injury, liver injury, and endothelial dysfunction. Stem Cells Transl Med. (2016) 5:1048–57. doi: 10.5966/sctm.2015-0138

  • 159

    LiangXLiTZhouQPiSLiYChenXet al. Mesenchymal stem cells attenuate sepsis-induced liver injury via inhibiting M1 polarization of kupffer cells. Mol Cell Biochem. (2019) 452:187–97. doi: 10.1007/s11010-018-3424-7

  • 160

    ValadiHEkströmKBossiosASjöstrandMLeeJJLötvallJO. Exosome-mediated transfer of mrnas and micrornas is a novel mechanism of genetic exchange between cells. Nat Cell Biol. (2007) 9:654–9. doi: 10.1038/ncb1596

  • 161

    ParkEJAppiahMGMyintPKGaowaAKawamotoEShimaokaM. Exosomes in sepsis and inflammatory tissue injury. Curr Pharm Des. (2019) 25:4486–95. doi: 10.2174/1381612825666191116125525

  • 162

    CaiJTangDHaoXLiuELiWShiJ. Mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosome alleviates sepsis- associated acute liver injury by suppressing malat1 through microrna-26a-5p: an innovative immunopharmacological intervention and therapeutic approach for sepsis. Front Immunol. (2023) 14:1157793. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1157793

Summary

Keywords

sepsis, liver injury, inflammation, oxidative stress, pyroptosis, autophagy, noncoding regulation

Citation

Xu X, Yang T, An J, Li B and Dou Z (2025) Liver injury in sepsis: manifestations, mechanisms and emerging therapeutic strategies. Front. Immunol. 16:1575554. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1575554

Received

12 February 2025

Accepted

13 March 2025

Published

28 March 2025

Volume

16 - 2025

Edited by

Lulong Bo, Navy Medical University, China

Reviewed by

Yukun Liu, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, China

Hao Wang, Shandong University, China

Updates

Copyright

© 2025 Xu, Yang, An, Li and Dou.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Zhimin Dou,

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Figures

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Share on WeChat

Scan with WeChat to share this article

Article metrics