Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

MINI REVIEW article

Front. Immunol., 18 December 2025

Sec. Cytokines and Soluble Mediators in Immunity

Volume 16 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2025.1697059

This article is part of the Research TopicInnovations in targeting intestinal immunity for chronic inflammatory disordersView all 19 articles

MicroRNAs as multifaceted regulators and therapeutic targets in ulcerative colitis

Xuerui Wang,Xuerui Wang1,2Nan JiangNan Jiang3Weixiang YinWeixiang Yin4Xiaofeng Cui*Xiaofeng Cui1*
  • 1Department of Gastrointestinal Colorectal and Anal Surgery, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, China
  • 2Department of Clinical Laboratory, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, China
  • 3Department of Cardiovascular, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, China
  • 4Department of General Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, China

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic inflammatory bowel disease characterized by mucosal barrier disruption, immune dysregulation, and gut microbiota imbalance. MicroRNAs (miRNAs), small non-coding regulators of gene expression, have emerged as pivotal modulators of UC pathogenesis. By orchestrating epithelial cell apoptosis, tight junction integrity, and mucin secretion, miRNAs such as miR-223, miR-151-5p, and miR-429 contribute to barrier dysfunction. Additionally, miRNAs shape the innate and adaptive immune responses by influencing macrophage polarization, dendritic cell maturation, and T cell subset differentiation, including Th17/Treg and Th1/Th2 balance. Specific miRNAs further modulate gut microbial composition and host-microbe interactions. Clinically, circulating miRNAs serve as promising non-invasive biomarkers for disease diagnosis, activity monitoring, and therapeutic response prediction. Therapeutically, miRNA mimics and inhibitors have shown efficacy in early-phase clinical trials, offering a novel strategy beyond current biologics. This review summarizes recent mechanistic insights and translational advances, underscoring the multifaceted roles of miRNAs in UC and their potential to inform precision diagnostics and targeted therapies.

1 Introduction

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic immune-mediated disorder characterized pathologically by diffuse mucosal inflammation and clinically by abdominal pain, diarrhea, passage of mucus- and pus-laden bloody stools, and tenesmus (1). The incidence and prevalence of UC had risen in most Western nations as well as in newly industrialized countries (2), rendering it a substantial global healthcare burden (3). Consequently, there is an urgent clinical need for more effective diagnostic, monitoring, and therapeutic strategies for UC. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are endogenous, non-coding, single-stranded RNAs of 19–28 nucleotides that participate in diverse biological processes, including cell growth, differentiation, proliferation, and apoptosis, and are widely recognized as pivotal post-transcriptional regulators of gene expression (35). Increasing evidence has revealed a close association between miRNAs and UC pathogenesis. miRNAs can directly or indirectly modulate key pathogenic regulators and signaling cascades implicated in UC onset and progression, such as retinoic acid-related orphan receptor C (RORC), forkhead box transcription factor O1 (FoxO1), and signal transducer and activator of transcription 6 (STAT6), as well as the IL-6/STAT3, MAPK, and TLR4/MyD88/NF-κB signaling pathways (611). These regulatory networks influence the integrity of the intestinal mucosal barrier, the composition of the gut microbiota, and immune homeostasis, thereby exerting critical roles in UC pathophysiology.

Although conventional pharmacologic interventions such as glucocorticoids remain central to UC management, biologics have emerged as effective therapeutic modalities for UC (12). However, long-term administration is usually complicated by the development of drug tolerance and a spectrum of adverse effects (13). Therapeutic strategies based on miRNA modulation represent a promising alternative to biologics. Nevertheless, their clinical translation faces formidable challenges, including rapid degradation in the circulation, low cellular uptake, and poor systemic delivery specificity (14). To date, apart from ABX464, which is currently undergoing phase II clinical evaluation, some other miRNA-targeted therapeutics (miR-29 mimics) have been explored in preclinical studies (1518). This review synthesizes recent advances on the mechanistic relevance of miRNAs in UC pathogenesis, their potential utility as biomarkers for UC diagnosis and prognosis, and emerging miRNA-targeted therapeutics for UC, providing a conceptual and mechanistic framework to inform future diagnostic innovation and targeted therapy development for UC.

2 Mechanisms of miRNAs in UC progression

Mucosal barrier dysfunction, microbial dysbiosis, and immune homeostasis imbalance constitute the core pathogenic mechanisms of UC (19). Multiple studies have reported that miRNAs serve as critical regulators of the intestinal mucosal barrier, gut microbiota, and both innate and adaptive immunity, acting either directly or indirectly on colonic epithelial cells, junctional proteins, probiotic and opportunistic pathogenic bacteria, immune cell proliferation and differentiation, and inflammatory mediators.

2.1 miRNAs regulate UC via modulation of the intestinal mucosal barrier

The intestinal mucosal barrier serves as a critical innate defense mechanism that restricts the translocation of bacterial antigens and toxins, thereby preserving intestinal homeostasis (20). Emerging evidence underscores the role of microRNAs as pivotal regulators of epithelial barrier integrity in UC. Excessive apoptosis of intestinal epithelial cells (IECs) disrupts the proliferation–apoptosis equilibrium, diminishes the mucus layer, and enhances mucosal permeability, collectively exacerbating disease progression. Consequently, suppressing IEC apoptosis and facilitating mucosal repair represent central therapeutic objectives. Several miRNAs, including miR-330-3p, miR-223, and miR-452-5p, augment IEC apoptosis through distinct molecular pathways: miR-330-3p downregulates X-box binding protein 1 (XBP-1), a transcription factor induced by endoplasmic reticulum stress that modulates autophagy and apoptosis (21); miR-223 influences the PI3K/AKT/mTOR axis in IECs, thereby promoting apoptosis and impeding mucosal healing during inflammation (22); and miR-452-5p targets the anti-apoptotic protein Mcl-1, altering IEC responsiveness in murine models of inflammatory bowel disease (23). Beyond apoptosis regulation, miRNAs impair the mucosal mechanical barrier, a central element in UC pathogenesis. miR-151-5p upregulation increases caspase-3 and claudin-2 while reducing claudin-1 and occludin; exogenous brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) supplementation prevents tight junction (TJ) disruption and alleviates UC, suggesting that miR-151-5p targets BDNF to compromise TJ integrity (24). Similarly, miR-423-5p and miR-195-5p directly target claudin-5 and claudin-2, respectively, reducing TJ protein content (25, 26). Altered mucin expression further contributes to mucosal injury. In UC models, miR-429 is markedly downregulated, accompanied by reduced myristoylated alanine-rich C kinase substrate (MARCKS) levels. MARCKS plays a central role in the translocation of mucin-containing vesicles; its suppression by miR-429 leads to reduced secretion of MUC2 and MUC4, impairing the protective mucus layer and facilitating bacterial translocation. Besides, miR-429 modulates MARCKS-dependent secretion of mucins such as MUC2 and MUC4, influencing mucus layer integrity and permeability (27, 28). Collectively, miRNAs regulate UC progression by targeting apoptosis-related proteins, TJ components, and mucin secretion via defined signaling pathways. Such miRNA-mediated disruptions exacerbate mucosal permeability and accelerate disease progression, underscoring miRNA regulation of barrier integrity as a promising therapeutic target in UC.

2.2 miRNAs in innate immunity in UC

2.2.1 Macrophages

Macrophages, highly phagocytic cells central to innate immunity, are critical in UC pathogenesis. In the colonic lamina propria, mucosal macrophages are significantly expanded and activated in UC patients compared to healthy individuals, underscoring their involvement in disease initiation and progression (29). Primarily derived from circulating monocytes, intestinal macrophages undergo local differentiation into classically activated (M1) or alternatively activated (M2) subsets, guided by microenvironmental signals (30). M1 macrophages, polarized by Th1-type cytokines and stimulated by IFN-γ, LPS, and TNF-α, produce pro-inflammatory mediators such as IL-1β, IL-12, IL-23, and TNF-α, and express inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), thereby enhancing microbial clearance, recruiting inflammatory cells, and amplifying Th1/Th17 responses (31). Conversely, M2 macrophages, induced by Th2 cytokines (IL-4, IL-10, IL-13, TGF-β), release anti-inflammatory mediators (IL-4, IL-10, TGF-β) and chemokines (CCL17, CCL22, CCL24), which suppress Th1-mediated inflammation, promote Th2 immune polarization, and support epithelial restitution. In DSS-induced UC, miR-223 deficiency disrupts CX3CR1hi macrophage differentiation and enhances their pro-inflammatory phenotype by relieving repression of CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein β (C/EBPβ) via its 3′UTR. C/EBPβ overexpression rescues these defects, highlighting miR-223 as a key regulator of macrophage development and intestinal homeostasis (32). The M1/M2 ratio reflects the inflammatory milieu, with M1 predominance aggravating inflammation and M2 predominance favoring repair, making polarization a therapeutic target (33). In a high-fat diet (HFD) and DSS-induced ulcerative colitis model, lipid vesicles generated under HFD conditions facilitate M1 macrophage polarization and exacerbate intestinal inflammation through transcription-dependent mechanisms. Therapeutic modulation of inflammatory signaling pathways attenuates macrophage infiltration, suppresses M1 polarization, promotes M2 phenotypic switch, and ultimately ameliorates disease severity (34).

2.2.2 Dendritic cells

DCs are professional antigen-presenting cells capable of efficiently capturing, processing, and presenting antigens (35). Immature DCs function as potent inducers of T cell proliferation (36). Following maturation, they upregulate MHC class II and co-stimulatory molecules, thereby acquiring the capacity to prime naïve T cells and direct their differentiation toward Th1 or Th2 phenotypes (37). DC-derived IL-12, IL-16, and IL-23 promote Th1 responses, whereas Th2 cytokines (IL-4, IL-10) and regulatory T cells limit excessive Th1 activity, thereby reducing tissue injury (38). Given their pivotal role in sustaining immune homeostasis within genetically susceptible hosts, DC functionality is intimately associated with the pathogenesis of UC. Accumulating evidence highlights the contribution of specific microRNAs in modulating DC development, antigen presentation, and cytokine production (39). DC-specific intracellular adhesion molecule-3-grabbing nonintegrin (DC-SIGN, CD209), a C-type lectin receptor expressed on DC surfaces, interacts with various adhesion molecules and regulates immune responses (40). During monocyte-derived DC (moDC) differentiation, miR-181a promotes DC-SIGN expression and attenuates moDC responsiveness to both TLR ligands and CD40 engagement (41). Mechanistic studies demonstrate that miR-181a acts upstream of the ERK–MAPK pathway. Knockdown of miR-181a markedly reduces ERK phosphorylation upon GM-CSF and IL-4 stimulation, closely mirroring the effects of pharmacologic MEK1/2 inhibition by U0126 (42). Consistently, early blockade of ERK–MAPK signaling impairs DC-SIGN induction and skews differentiation toward a CD1a+CD14+DC-SIGN- phenotype, reproducing the cellular signature observed in miR-181a–deficient conditions (42). These findings position miR-181a as a critical determinant of terminal moDC differentiation, acting through ERK–MAPK–dependent induction of DC-SIGN.

2.2.3 Neutrophils

Neutrophils, the most abundant circulating immune cells, are essential for microbial clearance through phagocytosis, reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation, and neutrophil extracellular trap (NET) formation, processes that collectively help restore tissue homeostasis (43). However, excessive neutrophil activation in UC results in elevated ROS and protease release, which disrupt crypt architecture, amplify pro-inflammatory cytokine production, and further recruit neutrophils, thereby aggravating mucosal inflammation (44). Additionally, neutrophils also contribute to UC pathophysiology by facilitating lymphocyte migration and compromising epithelial barrier integrity. Recent investigations have revealed elevated expression of pro-inflammatory miR-23a and miR-155 in neutrophils infiltrating the colonic mucosa of UC patients. In clinical specimens and both in vivo and in vitro injury models, miR-155 was shown to promote DNA double-strand break accumulation by targeting nuclear lamina protein Lamin-B1 and suppressing RAD51-mediated homologous recombination repair, ultimately inducing acute colonic injury and genomic instability (45). Therapeutic inhibition of miR-23a and miR-155 in neutrophils reduces neutrophil infiltration, alleviates intestinal inflammation, and enhances mucosal repair in murine models of UC (45).

2.3 miRNAs in adaptive immunity in UC

2.3.1 Th1/Th2 cells

Although the pathogenesis of ulcerative colitis (UC) remains incompletely understood, dysregulation of Th1 and Th2 cell responses, coupled with cytokine imbalance, constitutes a major contributor to the breakdown of immune homeostasis. Th1 cells secrete pro-inflammatory cytokines, including IFN-γ and TNF-α, that sustain local inflammation and aggravate tissue injury. Furthermore, disruption of the Th1/Th2 equilibrium is strongly associated with both the initiation and progression of UC (46, 47). In UC models, miRNAs have been identified as key modulators Th1/Th2 balance. For instance, upregulation of miR-19b promotes Th2 cell differentiation by increasing the expression of the transcriptional regulator Runx3, thereby influencing inflammatory processes (48). Similarly, miR-214-3p has been shown to influence Th1/Th2 polarization by targeting the anti-apoptotic protein B-cell lymphoma 2 (Bcl-2), leading to enhanced susceptibility of Th1 cells to apoptosis and a relative expansion of Th2 subsets. Moreover, miR-214-3p indirectly stabilizes the transcriptional activity of signal transducer and activator of transcription 6 (STAT6), a master regulator of Th2 differentiation, thereby promoting the expression of IL-4 and GATA3 while suppressing IFN-γ (4951). Additionally, miR-21 contributes to UC pathogenesis by augmenting the synthesis and release of pro-inflammatory cytokines from colonic epithelial cells (49). Mechanistically, miR-21 targets and represses programmed cell death protein 4 (PDCD4), a known inhibitor of NF-κB and AP-1 transcriptional activity, thereby amplifying downstream IL-6 and TNF-α production and sustaining chronic mucosal inflammation (52).

2.3.2 Th17/Treg cells

Aberrant activation of Th17 cells, combined with functional deficiency in Tregs, constitutes a fundamental immune imbalance in UC pathogenesis (53, 54). Th17 cells exhibit a pro-inflammatory phenotype, producing IL-17, IL-21, IL-22, and TNF-α, which recruit monocytes and neutrophils, thereby amplifying intestinal inflammation (55). In contrast, Treg cells mediate immunosuppressive functions largely through IL-10 secretion (56). Consequently, miRNA-mediated regulation of the Th17/Treg balance has emerged as a key area for mechanistic and therapeutic investigation in UC. The differentiation of Th17 cells is directed by the lineage-defining transcription factor retinoic acid–related orphan receptor C (RORC) (57). Pei et al. (58) demonstrated that miR-22 overexpression in CD4+ T cells upregulates RORC, driving Th17 differentiation and enhancing the production of IL-17A, IL-6, and TNF-α, without altering Th1/Th2-associated transcription factors (T-bet, GATA3) or cytokines (IFN-γ, IL-4). Through luciferase reporter assays, histone deacetylase 4 (HDAC4) was identified as a direct target of miR-22, with an inverse correlation in expression. Notably, HDAC4 also influences Foxp3 transcription and IL-10 expression in regulatory T cells (59). By targeting HDAC4, miR-22 may impair Treg lineage stability and reduce IL-10 production, thereby indirectly enhancing Th17 predominance and inflammatory amplification (60). miR-425 represents another critical regulatory molecule, demonstrating significantly elevated expression in UC patients. Yang et al. (10) reported that in vivo inhibition of miR-425 significantly reduces Th17 cell infiltration in colonic tissues. Mechanistic studies revealed that miR-425 directly targets the 3′UTR of forkhead box O1 (Foxo1)—a transcription factor that negatively regulates ulcerative colitis progression—leading to its suppression and consequently promoting Th17 differentiation and exacerbating intestinal inflammation. Foxo1 also serves as a key transcriptional activator of IL-10 in regulatory T cells and is essential for maintaining their immunosuppressive function (61). Thus, miR-425-mediated Foxo1 suppression may not only promote Th17 differentiation but also destabilize Treg phenotype and diminish IL-10 output, contributing to the skewed Th17/Treg balance in UC. These findings identify miR-425 or Foxo1 as potential therapeutic targets.

2.4 miRNAs in gut microbiota modulation in UC

UC is an autoimmune disease in which intestinal microbiota dysbiosis plays a critical role in perturbing host immune homeostasis (62). Recent studies have revealed that both endogenous and exogenous miRNAs can directly modulate the gut microbiota (63). Ji et al. (64) reported that several miRNAs—such as miR-548a, miR-1226, miR-515-5p, and miR-199a—are differentially expressed in fecal samples from UC patients and can directly target Enterobacter and Escherichia coli, thereby modulating their proliferation and contributing to UC progression. In a miR-21 knockout murine model, the number of operational taxonomic units (OTUs) within the gut microbiota was markedly diminished, and loss of miR-21 attenuated dysbiosis-driven susceptibility to DSS-induced colitis, indicating that miR-21 exacerbates colonic inflammation by shaping microbial communities (65). At the genus level, the abundance of Salmonella, Anaerobiospirillum, and Oscillospira decreased, while Bifidobacterium and Aminobacterium proportions increased, indicating that miR-21 can modulate microbiota composition by reducing Bacteroides abundance and promoting Bifidobacterium proliferation (65). Functionally, increased Bifidobacterium abundance has been shown to promote the differentiation of regulatory T cells and elevate IL-10 production, contributing to the restoration of mucosal immune tolerance and attenuation of intestinal inflammation (66). Conversely, depletion of Oscillospira, which is inversely associated with gut permeability, has been linked to enhanced bacterial translocation and activation of TLR4 signaling pathways in lamina propria macrophages, thereby amplifying NF-κB–mediated pro-inflammatory cytokine release (67). These findings underscore the immunoregulatory consequences of miRNA-induced microbiota shifts in UC. Beyond direct microbial targeting, miRNAs can indirectly influence the microbiota through modulation of immune cell activity, inflammatory mediators, and intestinal mucosal barrier function. Yu et al. (68) demonstrated that Fusobacterium nucleatum activates the TLR4/MYD88 signaling pathway to regulate the expression of miR-18a and miR-4802, which in turn suppress their autophagy-related gene targets—autophagy-associated gene 7 (ATG7) and Unc-51-like kinase 1 (ULK1). This inhibition impairs autophagic processes, thereby exacerbating UC (Figure 1). Moreover, bacterial extracellular vesicles (BEVs), released by both commensal and pathogenic bacteria, contain abundant RNA cargo, including small RNAs and host-interacting miRNA-like molecules, that can profoundly influence host immune responses partly through activation of Th1 and Th17 cell pathways (69).

Figure 1
Diagram illustrating the role of miRNAs in ulcerative colitis (UC) across three panels. The left panel shows miRNAs regulating the intestinal mucosal barrier, including mechanisms of IEC apoptosis and the impairment of mucus and tight junctions, leading to bacterial translocation. The middle panel discusses miRNAs in innate immunity, detailing M1 and M2 macrophage involvement, inflammatory cell recruitment, and epithelial repair. The right panel covers miRNAs in adaptive immunity, focusing on Th1/Th2 differentiation, mucosal inflammation, and microbiota dysbiosis, contributing to host immune homeostasis.

Figure 1. Roles of miRNAs in epithelial barrier integrity, innate immunity, and adaptive immune regulation in ulcerative colitis (UC).

3 miRNAs in UC clinical diagnosis, prognosis, and therapy

3.1 miRNAs as diagnostic, monitoring, and prognostic biomarkers in UC

Current UC diagnosis relies on invasive methods such as endoscopy and biopsy, which pose risks of perforation, hemorrhage, and mortality (70). miRNAs have emerged as promising non-invasive biomarkers for diagnosis, monitoring, and prognosis. Quantification of plasma miR-21 and miR-92a via RT-qPCR achieved around 90% sensitivity and specificity in differentiating UC from colorectal cancer, irritable bowel syndrome, and healthy controls (71). A two-miRNA panel (miR-598, miR-642) similarly enabled early UC detection (72). However, markers like miR-21 and miR-223 lack disease specificity, as both are elevated in Crohn’s disease, colorectal cancer, and even some IBS cases (71, 7375). Thus, their diagnostic use should be contextualized alongside more UC-selective indicators. For disease monitoring, serum miR-223 demonstrates a stronger correlation with the Mayo endoscopic score (MES) than conventional biomarkers such as ESR or CRP (76, 77). A combined signature of miR-3615, miR-4792, and serum albumin accurately predicts a 90% one-year risk of treatment escalation (78). Furthermore, glucocorticoid-resistant UC patients consistently exhibit downregulation of miR-16-2-3p, miR-30e-3p, miR-32-5p, miR-642a-5p, miR-150-5p, and miR-224-5p (79), while a separate nine-miRNA signature effectively discriminates non-responders to biologic therapies (80). Collectively, miR-21, miR-92a, miR-598, miR-642, and miR-223 exhibit high diagnostic potential; miR-223 offers superior disease activity tracking, while other miRNAs predict prognosis and therapy responsiveness, underscoring their clinical utility in UC.

3.2 miRNA-targeted therapeutics in UC

Beyond the diagnostic value, miRNAs represent promising therapeutic agents for UC, especially in biologic resistance (81). Current approaches employ miRNA antagonists, chemically modified antisense oligonucleotides that inhibit target miRNAs, and mimics, which are synthetic double-stranded RNA oligonucleotides that restore or enhance miRNA activity. Among these, the miR-124–inducing agent ABX464 has shown particular clinical promise. This small molecule selectively upregulates miR-124 in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells and colonic macrophages, where it suppresses pro-inflammatory cytokines by targeting IL-6/STAT3 signaling. Although direct regulation of epithelial cells by miR-124 in UC remains unconfirmed (81, 82), preclinical DSS-induced colitis models demonstrated dose-dependent anti-inflammatory effects of ABX464 (83), primarily through miR-124 mediated downregulation of CCL2. CCL2 inhibition attenuates monocyte recruitment and promotes M2-like macrophage polarization, which facilitates mucosal healing via IL-10 and TGF-β secretion (84, 85). In a phase IIa trial (NCT03093259), ABX464 reduced adverse events compared to placebo and yielded superior endoscopic and clinical outcomes. Clinical remission and response rates were increased for placebo, and endoscopic improvement reached 50% (15). Patients with moderate-to-severe UC exhibited sustained improvements in modified Mayo scores, clinical response, remission, and endoscopic outcomes (86). Collectively, miRNA antagonists and mimics constitute a promising therapeutic class for UC, with ABX464 demonstrating robust efficacy and tolerability (Table 1).

Table 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Representative miRNAs in ulcerative colitis: molecular targets, pathways, and clinical relevance.

4 Conclusion

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) represent a convergent regulatory hub that orchestrates intestinal epithelial integrity, immune equilibrium, and microbial composition in ulcerative colitis (UC). Through their control over apoptosis, tight junction proteins, mucin secretion, and immune cell polarization, miRNAs bridge molecular events between epithelial injury and immune dysregulation. They also shape the gut microbial ecosystem, influencing host–microbe interactions that sustain or disrupt mucosal tolerance. This integrative role underscores miRNAs as both mechanistic drivers and dynamic indicators of UC pathogenesis, providing molecular insight into disease initiation, progression, and relapse.

Clinically, miRNAs have transcended their mechanistic importance to emerge as promising biomarkers and therapeutic agents. Circulating miRNAs offer non-invasive diagnostic and prognostic value, while therapeutic modulation, via mimics or inhibitors, shows encouraging efficacy, as evidenced by agents such as ABX464. Despite challenges including delivery efficiency, off-target effects, and pharmacokinetic stability, the translation of miRNA-targeted interventions represents a paradigm shift beyond conventional biologics. Future research integrating multi-omics profiling and targeted delivery systems will be pivotal to harness miRNAs for precision medicine, advancing the next generation of UC diagnostics and therapeutics.

Author contributions

XW: Writing – original draft. NJ: Writing – original draft. WY: Writing – original draft. XC: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declared that financial support was not received for this work and/or its publication.

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Wangchuk P, Yeshi K, and Loukas A. Ulcerative colitis: clinical biomarkers, therapeutic targets, and emerging treatments. Trends Pharmacol Sci. (2024) 45:892–903. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2024.08.003

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Segal JP, LeBlanc JF, and Hart AL. Ulcerative colitis: an update. Clin Med (Lond). (2021) 21:135–9. doi: 10.7861/clinmed.2021-0080

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Fan R, Xiao C, Wan X, Cha W, Miao Y, Zhou Y, et al. Small molecules with big roles in microRNA chemical biology and microRNA-targeted therapeutics. RNA Biol. (2019) 16:707–18. doi: 10.1080/15476286.2019.1593094

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Weidner J, Bartel S, Kılıç A, Zissler UM, Renz H, Schwarze J, et al. Spotlight on microRNAs in allergy and asthma. Allergy. (2021) 76:1661–78. doi: 10.1111/all.14646

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Gon Y, Shimizu T, Mizumura K, Maruoka S, and Hikichi M. Molecular techniques for respiratory diseases: MicroRNA and extracellular vesicles. Respirology. (2020) 25:149–60. doi: 10.1111/resp.13756

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Xiao X, Mao X, Chen D, Yu B, He J, Yan H, et al. miRNAs can affect intestinal epithelial barrier in inflammatory bowel disease. Front Immunol. (2022) 13:868229. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.868229

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Zhou J, Liu J, Gao Y, Shen L, Li S, and Chen S. miRNA-based potential biomarkers and new molecular insights in ulcerative colitis. Front Pharmacol. (2021) 12:707776. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.707776

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Wen Y, Wang H, Tian D, and Wang G. TH17 cell: a double-edged sword in the development of inflammatory bowel disease. Therap Adv Gastroenterol. (2024) 17:17562848241230896. doi: 10.1177/17562848241230896

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Lu X, Yu Y, and Tan S. The role of the miR-21-5p-mediated inflammatory pathway in ulcerative colitis. Exp Ther Med. (2020) 19:981–9. doi: 10.3892/etm.2019.8277

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Yang X, He Q, Guo Z, Xiong F, Li Y, Pan Y, et al. MicroRNA-425 facilitates pathogenic Th17 cell differentiation by targeting forkhead box O1 (Foxo1) and is associated with inflammatory bowel disease. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. (2018) 496:352–8. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2018.01.055

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Angelou CC, Wells AC, Vijayaraghavan J, Dougan CE, Lawlor R, Iverson E, et al. Differentiation of pathogenic th17 cells is negatively regulated by let-7 microRNAs in a mouse model of multiple sclerosis. Front Immunol. (2019) 10:3125. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.03125

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Atreya R, Neurath MF, and Siegmund B. Personalizing treatment in IBD: hype or reality in 2020? Can we predict response to anti-TNF? Front Med (Lausanne). (2020) 7:517. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2020.00517

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Aggeletopoulou I, Mouzaki A, Thomopoulos K, and Triantos C. miRNA molecules-late breaking treatment for inflammatory bowel diseases? Int J Mol Sci. (2023) 24:2233. doi: 10.3390/ijms24032233

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Diener C, Keller A, and Meese E. Emerging concepts of miRNA therapeutics: from cells to clinic. Trends Genet. (2022) 38:613–26. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2022.02.006

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Vermeire S, Hébuterne X, Tilg H, De Hertogh G, Gineste P, and Steens JM. Induction and long-term follow-up with ABX464 for moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis: results of phase IIa trial. Gastroenterology. (2021) 160:2595–2598.e2593. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2021.02.054

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Vermeire S, Solitano V, Peyrin-Biroulet L, Tilg H, Danese S, Ehrlich H, et al. Obefazimod: A first-in-class drug for the treatment of ulcerative colitis. J Crohns Colitis. (2023) 17:1689–97. doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad067

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Vermeire S, Nitcheu J, Gineste P, Flatres A, Santo J, Scherrer D, et al. Obefazimod in patients with moderate-to-severely active ulcerative colitis: efficacy and safety analysis from the 96-week open-label maintenance phase 2b study. J Crohns Colitis. (2025) 19:jjaf074. doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjaf074

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Lin Y, Wang Y, Zhang Y, Lu Y, Chen J, Luo Y, et al. MiR-29a/b suppresses CD8(+) T cell effector function and intestinal inflammation. Explor (Beijing). (2025) 5:20240363. doi: 10.1002/EXP.20240363

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Akkoç T. Epithelial barrier dysfunction and microbial dysbiosis: exploring the pathogenesis and therapeutic strategies for Crohn’s disease. Tissue Barriers. (2025) 13:2390705. doi: 10.1080/21688370.2024.2390705

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

20. König J, Wells J, Cani PD, García-Ródenas CL, MacDonald T, Mercenier A, et al. Human intestinal barrier function in health and disease. Clin Transl Gastroenterol. (2016) 7:e196. doi: 10.1038/ctg.2016.54

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Chen Q, Fang X, Yao N, Wu F, Xu B, and Chen Z. Suppression of miR-330-3p alleviates DSS-induced ulcerative colitis and apoptosis by upregulating the endoplasmic reticulum stress components XBP1. Hereditas. (2020) 157:18. doi: 10.1186/s41065-020-00135-z

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Jiang W, Han YP, Hu M, Bao XQ, Yan Y, and Chen G. A study on regulatory mechanism of miR-223 in ulcerative colitis through PI3K/Akt-mTOR signaling pathway. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. (2019) 23:4865–72. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_201906_18074

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Deng M, Hu J, Tong R, Guo H, Li X, and Liu Y. miR-452-5p regulates the responsiveness of intestinal epithelial cells in inflammatory bowel disease through Mcl-1. Exp Ther Med. (2021) 22:813. doi: 10.3892/etm.2021.10245

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Zhou F, Chen L, Xu S, Si C, Li N, Dong H, et al. Upregulation of miR-151-5p promotes the apoptosis of intestinal epithelial cells by targeting brain-derived neurotrophic factor in ulcerative colitis mice. Cell Cycle. (2022) 21:2615–26. doi: 10.1080/15384101.2022.2105905

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Wang M, Guo J, Zhao YQ, and Wang JP. IL-21 mediates microRNA-423-5p/claudin-5 signal pathway and intestinal barrier function in inflammatory bowel disease. Aging (Albany NY). (2020) 12:16099–110. doi: 10.18632/aging.103566

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Scalavino V, Piccinno E, Bianco G, Schena N, Armentano R, Giannelli G, et al. The increase of miR-195-5p reduces intestinal permeability in ulcerative colitis, modulating tight junctions’ Expression. Int J Mol Sci. (2022) 23:5840. doi: 10.3390/ijms23105840

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Stiegeler S, Mercurio K, Iancu MA, and Corr SC. The impact of microRNAs during inflammatory bowel disease: effects on the mucus layer and intercellular junctions for gut permeability. Cells. (2021) 10:3358. doi: 10.3390/cells10123358

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Mo JS, Alam KJ, Kim HS, Lee YM, Yun KJ, and Chae SC. MicroRNA 429 regulates mucin gene expression and secretion in murine model of colitis. J Crohns Colitis. (2016) 10:837–49. doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjw033

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Na YR, Stakenborg M, Seok SH, and Matteoli G. Macrophages in intestinal inflammation and resolution: a potential therapeutic target in IBD. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. (2019) 16:531–43. doi: 10.1038/s41575-019-0172-4

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Lu H, Suo Z, Lin J, Cong Y, and Liu Z. Monocyte-macrophages modulate intestinal homeostasis in inflammatory bowel disease. biomark Res. (2024) 12:76. doi: 10.1186/s40364-024-00612-x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Kang S and Kumanogoh A. The spectrum of macrophage activation by immunometabolism. Int Immunol. (2020) 32:467–73. doi: 10.1093/intimm/dxaa017

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Zhou H, Xiao J, Wu N, Liu C, Xu J, Liu F, et al. MicroRNA-223 regulates the differentiation and function of intestinal dendritic cells and macrophages by targeting C/EBPβ. Cell Rep. (2015) 13:1149–60. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.09.073

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Yang Z, Lin S, Feng W, Liu Y, Song Z, Pan G, et al. A potential therapeutic target in traditional Chinese medicine for ulcerative colitis: Macrophage polarization. Front Pharmacol. (2022) 13:999179. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.999179

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Wei M, Gao X, Liu L, Li Z, Wan Z, Dong Y, et al. Visceral adipose tissue derived exosomes exacerbate colitis severity via pro-inflammatory miRNAs in high fat diet fed mice. ACS Nano. (2020) 14:5099–110. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.0c01860

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Del Prete A, Salvi V, Soriani A, Laffranchi M, Sozio F, Bosisio D, et al. Dendritic cell subsets in cancer immunity and tumor antigen sensing. Cell Mol Immunol. (2023) 20:432–47. doi: 10.1038/s41423-023-00990-6

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Segerer SE, Müller N, van den Brandt J, Kapp M, Dietl J, Reichardt HM, et al. Impact of female sex hormones on the maturation and function of human dendritic cells. Am J Reprod Immunol. (2009) 62:165–73. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0897.2009.00726.x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Troise D, Infante B, Mercuri S, Catalano V, Ranieri E, and Stallone G. Dendritic cells: A bridge between tolerance induction and cancer development in transplantation setting. Biomedicines. (2024) 12:1240. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines12061240

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Gaudino SJ and Kumar P. Cross-talk between antigen presenting cells and T cells impacts intestinal homeostasis, bacterial infections, and tumorigenesis. Front Immunol. (2019) 10:360. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.00360

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Smyth LA, Boardman DA, Tung SL, Lechler R, and Lombardi G. MicroRNAs affect dendritic cell function and phenotype. Immunology. (2015) 144:197–205. doi: 10.1111/imm.12390

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Noll AJ, Yu Y, Lasanajak Y, Duska-McEwen G, Buck RH, Smith DF, et al. Human DC-SIGN binds specific human milk glycans. Biochem J. (2016) 473:1343–53. doi: 10.1042/BCJ20160046

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Lim CX, Lee B, Geiger O, Passegger C, Beitzinger M, Romberger J, et al. miR-181a modulation of ERK-MAPK signaling sustains DC-SIGN expression and limits activation of monocyte-derived dendritic cells. Cell Rep. (2020) 30:3793–3805.e3795. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.02.077

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Lim CX, Lee B, Geiger O, Passegger C, Beitzinger M, Romberger J, et al. Stoiber HJCr: miR-181a modulation of ERK-MAPK signaling sustains DC-SIGN expression and limits activation of monocyte-derived dendritic cells. Cell Rep. (2020) 30:3793–3805.e3795. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.02.077

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Jorch SK and Kubes P. An emerging role for neutrophil extracellular traps in noninfectious disease. Nat Med. (2017) 23:279–87. doi: 10.1038/nm.4294

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Zhou GX and Liu ZJ. Potential roles of neutrophils in regulating intestinal mucosal inflammation of inflammatory bowel disease. J Dig Dis. (2017) 18:495–503. doi: 10.1111/1751-2980.12540

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Butin-Israeli V, Bui TM, Wiesolek HL, Mascarenhas L, Lee JJ, Mehl LC, et al. Neutrophil-induced genomic instability impedes resolution of inflammation and wound healing. J Clin Invest. (2019) 129:712–26. doi: 10.1172/JCI122085

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Leppkes M and Neurath MF. Cytokines in inflammatory bowel diseases - Update 2020. Pharmacol Res. (2020) 158:104835. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2020.104835

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Saba E, Lee YY, Rhee MH, and Kim SD. Alleviation of Ulcerative Colitis Potentially through th1/th2 Cytokine Balance by a Mixture of Rg3-enriched Korean Red Ginseng Extract and Persicaria tinctoria. Molecules. (2020) 25:5230. doi: 10.3390/molecules25225230

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Qiao CX, Xu S, Wang DD, Gao SY, Zhao SF, Zhang ML, et al. MicroRNA-19b alleviates lipopolysaccharide-induced inflammatory injury in human intestinal cells by up-regulation of Runx3. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. (2018) 22:5284–94. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_201808_15728

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Li JA, Wang YD, Wang K, Wang ZL, Jia DY, Yang BY, et al. Downregulation of miR-214-3p May Contribute to Pathogenesis of Ulcerative Colitis via Targeting STAT6. BioMed Res Int. (2017) 2017:8524972. doi: 10.1155/2017/8524972

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Wu Y, Yao J, Xie J, Liu Z, Zhou Y, Pan H, et al. The role of autophagy in colitis-associated colorectal cancer. Signal Transduct Target Ther. (2018) 3:31. doi: 10.1038/s41392-018-0031-8

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Rodríguez-Galán A, Fernández-Messina L, and Sánchez-Madrid F. Control of immunoregulatory molecules by miRNAs in T cell activation. Front Immunol. (2018) 9:2148. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.02148

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

52. Ferris WF. The Role and Interactions of Programmed Cell Death 4 and its Regulation by microRNA in Transformed Cells of the Gastrointestinal Tract. Front Oncol. (2022) 12:903374. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.903374

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

53. Globig AM, Hennecke N, Martin B, Seidl M, Ruf G, Hasselblatt P, et al. Comprehensive intestinal T helper cell profiling reveals specific accumulation of IFN-γ+IL-17+coproducing CD4+ T cells in active inflammatory bowel disease. Inflammation Bowel Dis. (2014) 20:2321–9. doi: 10.1097/MIB.0000000000000210

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

54. Lv L, Chen Z, Bai W, Hao J, Heng Z, Meng C, et al. Taurohyodeoxycholic acid alleviates trinitrobenzene sulfonic acid induced ulcerative colitis via regulating Th1/Th2 and Th17/Treg cells balance. Life Sci. (2023) 318:121501. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2023.121501

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

55. Monteleone I, Sarra M, Pallone F, and Monteleone G. Th17-related cytokines in inflammatory bowel diseases: friends or foes? Curr Mol Med. (2012) 12:592–7. doi: 10.2174/156652412800620066

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

56. Noack M and Miossec P. Th17 and regulatory T cell balance in autoimmune and inflammatory diseases. Autoimmun Rev. (2014) 13:668–77. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2013.12.004

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

57. Chi X, Jin W, Zhao X, Xie T, Shao J, Bai X, et al. RORγt expression in mature TH17 cells safeguards their lineage specification by inhibiting conversion to TH2 cells. Sci Adv. (2022) 8:. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abn7774

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

58. Pei XF, Cao LL, Huang F, Qiao X, Yu J, Ye H, et al. Role of miR-22 in intestinal mucosa tissues and peripheral blood CD4+ T cells of inflammatory bowel disease. Pathol Res Pract. (2018) 214:1095–104. doi: 10.1016/j.prp.2018.04.009

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

59. Pieniawska M. Iżykowska K: role of histone deacetylases in T-cell development and function. Int J Mol Sci. (2022) 23:7828. doi: 10.3390/ijms23147828

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

60. Jia Y and Wei Y. Modulators of microRNA function in the immune system. Int J Mol Sci. (2020) 21:2357. doi: 10.3390/ijms21072357

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

61. Kim ME, Kim DH, and Lee JS. FoxO transcription factors: applicability as a novel immune cell regulators and therapeutic targets in oxidative stress-related diseases. Int J Mol Sci. (2022) 23:11877. doi: 10.3390/ijms231911877

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

62. Ding G, Yang X, Li Y, Wang Y, Du Y, Wang M, et al. Gut microbiota regulates gut homeostasis, mucosal immunity and influences immune-related diseases. Mol Cell Biochem. (2025) 480:1969–81. doi: 10.1007/s11010-024-05077-y

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

63. He T, Ma J, Liu S, Ma B, You J, Wang J, et al. MicroRNA-microbiota interactions: Emerging strategies for modulating intestinal homeostasis and enhancing host health. iMetaOmics. (2025) 2:. doi: 10.1002/imo2.57

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

64. Ji Y, Li X, Zhu Y, Li N, Zhang N, and Niu M. Faecal microRNA as a biomarker of the activity and prognosis of inflammatory bowel diseases. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. (2018) 503:2443–50. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2018.06.174

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

65. Johnston DGW, Williams MA, Thaiss CA, Cabrera-Rubio R, Raverdeau M, McEntee C, et al. Loss of microRNA-21 influences the gut microbiota, causing reduced susceptibility in a murine model of colitis. J Crohns Colitis. (2018) 12:835–48. doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjy038

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

66. Gavzy SJ, Kensiski A, Lee ZL, Mongodin EF, Ma B, and Bromberg JS. Bifidobacterium mechanisms of immune modulation and tolerance. Gut Microbes. (2023) 15:2291164. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2023.2291164

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

67. Di Vincenzo F, Del Gaudio A, Petito V, Lopetuso LR, and Scaldaferri F. Gut microbiota, intestinal permeability, and systemic inflammation: a narrative review. Intern Emerg Med. (2024) 19:275–93. doi: 10.1007/s11739-023-03374-w

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

68. Yu T, Guo F, Yu Y, Sun T, Ma D, Han J, et al. Fusobacterium nucleatum promotes chemoresistance to colorectal cancer by modulating autophagy. Cell. (2017) 170:548–563.e516. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.07.008

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

69. Luo R, Chang Y, Liang H, Zhang W, Song Y, Li G, et al. Interactions between extracellular vesicles and microbiome in human diseases: New therapeutic opportunities. Imeta. (2023) 2:e86. doi: 10.1002/imt2.86

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

70. Kobayashi T, Siegmund B, Le Berre C, Wei SC, Ferrante M, Shen B, et al. Ulcerative colitis. Nat Rev Dis Primers. (2020) 6:74. doi: 10.1038/s41572-020-0205-x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

71. Ahmed Hassan E, El-Din Abd El-Rehim AS, Mohammed Kholef EF, and Abd-Elgwad Elsewify W. Potential role of plasma miR-21 and miR-92a in distinguishing between irritable bowel syndrome, ulcerative colitis, and colorectal cancer. Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench. (2020) 13:147–54.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

72. Netz U, Carter J, Eichenberger MR, Feagins K, Galbraith NJ, Dryden GW, et al. Plasma microRNA profile differentiates crohn’s colitis from ulcerative colitis. Inflammation Bowel Dis. (2017) 24:159–65. doi: 10.1093/ibd/izx009

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

73. Wang Z, Zhou H, Cheng F, Zhang Z, and Long S. MiR-21 regulates epithelial-mesenchymal transition in intestinal fibrosis of Crohn’s disease by targeting PTEN/mTOR. Dig Liver Dis. (2022) 54:1358–66. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2022.04.007

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

74. Oliveira ECS, Quaglio AEV, Magro DO, Di Stasi LC, and Sassaki LY. Intestinal Microbiota and miRNA in IBD: A Narrative Review about Discoveries and Perspectives for the Future. Int J Mol Sci. (2023) 24:7176. doi: 10.3390/ijms24087176

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

75. Chen J and Vitetta L. Is miR-223 upregulation in inflammatory bowel diseases a protective response? Front Biosci (Elite Ed). (2023) 15:5. doi: 10.31083/j.fbe1501005

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

76. Wang H, Zhang S, Yu Q, Yang G, Guo J, Li M, et al. Circulating microRNA223 is a new biomarker for inflammatory bowel disease. Med (Baltimore). (2016) 95:e2703. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000002703

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

77. Polytarchou C, Oikonomopoulos A, Mahurkar S, Touroutoglou A, Koukos G, Hommes DW, et al. Assessment of circulating microRNAs for the diagnosis and disease activity evaluation in patients with ulcerative colitis by using the nanostring technology. Inflammation Bowel Dis. (2015) 21:2533–9. doi: 10.1097/MIB.0000000000000547

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

78. Kalla R, Adams AT, Ventham NT, Kennedy NA, White R, Clarke C, et al. Whole Blood Profiling of T-cell-Derived microRNA Allows the Development of Prognostic models in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. J Crohns Colitis. (2020) 14:1724–33. doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjaa134

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

79. Luo J, Wang Y, Lan D, Niu J, Miao J, Dong X, et al. Differential expression of serum microRNAs in glucocorticoid-resistant patients with ulcerative colitis. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. (2018) 11:936–46.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

80. Morilla I, Uzzan M, Laharie D, Cazals-Hatem D, Denost Q, Daniel F, et al. Colonic microRNA profiles, identified by a deep learning algorithm, that predict responses to therapy of patients with acute severe ulcerative colitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. (2019) 17:905–13. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.08.068

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

81. Innocenti T, Bigagli E, Lynch EN, Galli A, and Dragoni G. MiRNA-based therapies for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease: what are we still missing? Inflammation Bowel Dis. (2023) 29:308–23. doi: 10.1093/ibd/izac122

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

82. Tazi J, Begon-Pescia C, Campos N, Apolit C, Garcel A, and Scherrer D. Specific and selective induction of miR-124 in immune cells by the quinoline ABX464: a transformative therapy for inflammatory diseases. Drug Discov Today. (2021) 26:1030–9. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2020.12.019

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

83. Chebli K, Papon L, Paul C, Garcel A, Campos N, Scherrer D, et al. Tazi J: the anti-hiv candidate abx464 dampens intestinal inflammation by triggering il-22 production in activated macrophages. Sci Rep. (2017) 7:4860. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-04071-3

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

84. Apolit C, Campos N, Vautrin A, Begon-Pescia C, Lapasset L, Scherrer D, et al. ABX464 (Obefazimod) upregulates miR-124 to reduce proinflammatory markers in inflammatory bowel diseases. Clin Transl Gastroenterol. (2023) 14:e00560. doi: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000560

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

85. Deci MB, Ferguson SW, Scatigno SL, and Nguyen J. Modulating macrophage polarization through CCR2 inhibition and multivalent engagement. Mol Pharm. (2018) 15:2721–31. doi: 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.8b00237

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

86. Vermeire S, Sands BE, Tilg H, Tulassay Z, Kempinski R, Danese S, et al. ABX464 (obefazimod) for moderate-to-severe, active ulcerative colitis: a phase 2b, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled induction trial and 48 week, open-label extension. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. (2022) 7:1024–35. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(22)00233-3

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: biomarkers, gut microbiota, immune homeostasis, microRNAs, miRNA-targeted therapeutics, ulcerative colitis

Citation: Wang X, Jiang N, Yin W and Cui X (2025) MicroRNAs as multifaceted regulators and therapeutic targets in ulcerative colitis. Front. Immunol. 16:1697059. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1697059

Received: 01 September 2025; Accepted: 02 December 2025; Revised: 28 November 2025;
Published: 18 December 2025.

Edited by:

Yukihiro Yamaguchi, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, United States

Reviewed by:

Tianle He, Southwest University, China
Min Miao, Ningbo University, China

Copyright © 2025 Wang, Jiang, Yin and Cui. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Xiaofeng Cui, eGZjdWlAamx1LmVkdS5jbg==

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.