Impact Factor 4.019

The world's most-cited Microbiology journal

Original Research ARTICLE

Front. Microbiol., 22 October 2018 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.02427

Effects of Probiotic Bacillus as an Alternative of Antibiotics on Digestive Enzymes Activity and Intestinal Integrity of Piglets

Shenglan Hu1,2†, Xuefang Cao1†, Yanping Wu1, Xiaoqiang Mei1, Han Xu1, Yang Wang1, Xiaoping Zhang3, Li Gong1* and Weifen Li1*
  • 1Key Laboratory of Molecular Animal Nutrition and Feed Sciences, College of Animal Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
  • 2State Key Laboratory of Livestock and Poultry Breeding, Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science in South China, Ministry of Agriculture, Institute of Animal Science, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou, China
  • 3Key Laboratory of Resources and Utilization of Bamboo of State Forestry Administration, China National Bamboo Research Center, Hangzhou, China

The previous study in our team found that supplementation of probiotic Bacillus amyloliquefaciens (Ba) instead of antibiotics promote growth performance of piglets. Hence, the present study was carried out to further demonstrate the effect of Ba replacement of antibiotics on digestive and absorption enzyme activity and intestinal microbiota population of piglets. A total of 90 piglets were selected and divided into three groups: G1 group was fed with basal diet supplemented with 150 mg/Kg aureomycin, G2 group was fed with 1 × 108 cfu/Kg Ba and half dose of aureomycin, G3 group was used the diet with 2 × 108cfu/Kg Ba replaced aureomycin. Each treatment had three replications of 10 pigs per pen. Results indicated that Ba replacement significantly increased the activities of amylase, disaccharides and Na+/K+-ATPase. And chymotrypsin activity in different section of intestine was dramatically enhanced in half replacement of aureomycin with Ba. Moreover, Ba replacement maintained the intestinal integrity with the significantly decreased activity of DAO compared with aureomycin group. Besides, supplementation with Ba increased the β-diversity of intestinal microbiota. Taken together, the current study indicated that diet supplementation with Ba instead of aureomycin increased the growth performance of piglets by improving the digestive and absorb enzyme activities, enhancing the intestinal integrity and regulating the population of intestinal micrbiota.

Introduction

Antibiotics have long been used to promote the growth and health of piglets (van den Bogaard and Stobberingh, 2000). However, with the increasing phenomena of bacterial resistance and antibiotic residues in animal products, the use of antibiotics in feed industry has been prohibited in many nations, such as Europe, United States, Korea, and so on (Martin et al., 2015; Walsh and Wu, 2016). Therefore, many alternatives to antibiotics have been developed (Wang et al., 2012, 2017). It is well known that probiotics are an alternative strategy to antibiotics. Previous researches illustrated that probiotics enhance growth performance of poultry and swine (Wang et al., 2012), modulate immune system (González-Ortiz et al., 2013), and promote intestinal health (Tojo et al., 2014). Probiotics, with the definition of live micro-organisms, are considered to have potential benefits on the host health (Hickey et al., 2012; Djurasevic et al., 2017). Many researches demonstrated that probiotics improve growth performance (Giang et al., 2010), modulate host immunity (Deng et al., 2013), and decrease the diarrhea rate of weaned piglets (González-Ortiz et al., 2013). Bacillus amyloliquefaciens is one of probiotic strains, which produces a variety of commercially important enzymes to improve digestibility and absorption of nutrients (Farhadi et al., 2003; Lee et al., 2008). Recent studies of our research group have found that replacing aureomycin with B. amyloliquefaciens SC06 significantly improve the daily weight gain of piglets, increase antioxidant capacity (Wang et al., 2017) and decrease bacterial translocation (Ji et al., 2013). However, little information about effects of B. amyloliquefaciens SC06 replacement on digestibility and absorption of nutrients in piglets was found. Therefore, the aim of this study was to clarify effects of probiotic Bacillus amyloliquefaciens as an alternative of antibiotics on main digestive and absorb enzymes in piglet intestine.

Materials and Methods

The experimental procedures used in the present study were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of Zhejiang University, and strictly followed the guidelines of the Guide for the Care and Use of Agricultural Animals in Research and Teaching.

Animals and Experimental Treatments

A total of 90 male Duroc × Landrace × Yorkshire piglets at 42 days old were blocked by BW (average 14.57 ± 0.25 kg), and randomly divided into three groups with 10 piglets pre pan and 3 pans pre group. The three groups were (1) Group1 (G1) fed the basal diet supplemented with 150 mg/Kg aureomycin, (2) Group 2 (G2) fed the basal diet supplemented with 75 mg/Kg aureomycin and 1 × 108 cfu/Kg Ba, and (3) Group 3 (G3) fed the basal diet with 2 × 108 cfu/Kg Ba. The composition of the basal diet was shown in Table 1. The experimental period was 28 days. Piglets were housed in a temperature-controlled nursery and had ad libitum access to feed and water. Ingredient and chemical composition of the basal diet were listed in Table 1.

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

TABLE 1. Ingredient and chemical composition of the basal diet (as-fed basis).

Bacterial Strain and Aureomycin

Bacillus amyloliquefaciens cells (China Center For Type Culture Collection, No: M2012280) (1 × 108 cfu/g) were prepared by the Laboratory of Microbiology, Institute of Feed Sciences, Zhejiang University, China. Starch was used to dilute Ba and the same amount of starch was also added to each group to compensate for the difference in nutrient composition of the diets. Aureomycin was obtained from Tongyi feed agriculture and animal husbandry Co., Ltd. (Qingdao, China).

Sample Collection

Six pigs were randomly selected from each group for sample collecting at the end of the experiment. After the slaughter, the gastrointestinal tract was immediately removed. The segments of jejunum were removed and rinsed with sterilized saline, and then the Jejunal mucosa was scraped from a 10–15 cm segment of jejunum. The content samples of duodenum, jejunum, ileum, and cecal were also collected. All samples were frozen in liquid nitrogen immediately and then stored at -70°C for further analysis.

Enzyme Activity Analyses

Jejunal mucosa samples were homogenized in ice-cold 0.1 mol/L, pH = 6.8 maleic acid buffer (1:10, w/v) and centrifuged at 3000 ×g for 10 min. Supernatants were collected to determinate the activities of surcrase, maltase, lactuase, AKPase, Na+, K+-ATPase, γ-glutamyl transferase (γ-GT) and DAO, following the protocol of assay kit purchased from Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute (Nanjing, China). The contents samples of duodenum, jejunum and ileum were homogenized with ice-cold physiologic saline (1:4, w/v) and supernatants were obtained by centrifugation at 3500 ×g for 15 min. The activities of chymotrypsin, amylase, trypsin, lipase in the supernatants of intestinal content were detected using the assay kit (Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute, Nanjing, China).

Western Blot Analysis

0.1 g jejunal mucosa was lysed with 500 μL cell lysis buffer for Western and IP (Beyotime Co. Ltd., Nantong, China). The lysates were centrifuged at 12,000 ×g for 5 min at 4°C and the supernatants were transferred to 1.5 ml Eppendorf tubes. The concentration of total protein was quantified by BCA Protein Assay Kit (Beyotime Co. Ltd., Nantong, China). Equal amount of cell lysates were resolved by SDS-PAGE, and then transferred electrophoretically to nitrocellulose membranes. After blocking with TBS containing 5% nonfat dry milk (Wondersun Inc., Haerbing, China) and 0.1% Tween-20 for 1 h at room temperature, the membranes were incubated with a primary antibody at 4°C overnight. After washing with TBST, membranes were incubated with secondary antibody linked to HRP. Detection by enzyme-linked chemiluminescence was performed follow the manufacturer’s protocol (ECL, Beyotime Co. Ltd., Nantong, China). Mouse anti-β-actin monoclonal antibody and IgG-HRP secondary antibodies were purchased from Beyotime Biotechnology (Nantong, China). Rabbit anti-SGLT1 and anti-PEPT1 were obtained from Abcam (MA, United States). Quantification of protein bands were analyzed using the Image J software.

DNA Extraction and Illumina Miseq

Microbial genome DNA was extracted from fecal samples (using TIANamp Stool DNA kit; TIANGEN, DP328) following the manufacture’s recommendation. The V3-V4 hyper variable regions of 16S rRNA were PCR amplified from microbial genome DNA which were harvested from fecal samples (n = 3) forward primers: 5′-CCTACGGGNGGCWGCAG-3′, reverse primers: 5′-GACTACHVGGGTATCTAATCC-3′). A total volume of 20 μL was prepared, containing 1 × reaction buffer, 2 mM Mg2+, 0.2 mM dNTP, 0.1 μM primers, 1 U HotStarTaq polymerase (QIAGEN, cat#203203) and 2 μL DNA template. The PCR program initially started with 94°C for 2 min; 94°C for 20 s, 52°C for 40 s and 72°C for 1 min, 72°C for 2 min, repeat for 30 cycles; 72°C 2 min; stored in 4°C. The PCR reaction system which was used to add specific tags sequence was 20 μL, containing 1 × reaction buffer (NEB Q5TM), 0.3 mM dNTP, 0.25 M of each primer, 1 U Q5TM DNA polymerase (NEB) and l μL of diluted template. The PCR condition were 98°C for 30 s; 94°C for 10 s, 65°C for 30 s and 72°C for 30 s, repeat for 30 cycles; 72°C for 5 min. PCR product was excised from a 1.5% agarose gel, purified by QIAquick Gel Extraction Kit (QIAGEN, cat# 28706) and quantified by UV-Vis spectrophotometer (NanoDrop ND1000, United States). Library construction and Illumina MiSeq sequencing was carried out in G-Bio Biotech (Hangzhou) Co., Ltd. And the information of DNA sequences was analyzed by QIIME software (Caporaso et al., 2010).

Statistical Analysis

The data in present study were analyzed by one-way ANOVA using the IBM SPSS 16.0. The values of P < 0.05 or 0.01were considered a statistically significant difference.

Results

Digestive Enzyme Activity in Intestinal Contents of the Piglets

Compare with the G1 group, half replacing antibiotic with Ba significantly enhanced the activity of chymotrypsin (P < 0.05) in jejunum and ileum contents, while decreased the chymotrypsin activity in duodenum contents. The activities of chymotrypsin in different intestinal sections in G3 group were slightly increased in compare to the G1 group. It was much higher than that of the G2 group. However, in jejunum and ileum, they were dramatically lower when compared G2 group with G3 group (Figure 1).

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 1. Effects of Ba on chymotrypsin activity in contents of duodenum (A), jejunum (B), and ileum (C). Results were expressed as mean ± SEM, n = 6. a and b means significantly different (p < 0.05).

The activity of amylase in intestinal contents was shown in Figure 2. Half replacing antibiotic with Ba significantly enhanced the amylase activity (P < 0.05) in the jejuna content when compared with the G1 group, and the piglets in G3 group had the highest amylase activity (P < 0.05) in the contents of duodenum and ileum (P < 0.05) among the three groups. In addition, it was observed that half replacing the antibiotic with Ba significantly increased the lipase activity in duodenal and jejunal content compared with the G1 group, and that in G3 group was dramatically enhanced in comparison with the G2 group (Figure 3A), while there was dramatical difference between G1 and G3 group (Figure 3B). However, there were no significant changes of trypsin activity in the content of duodenum and jejunum (Figures 4A,B).

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 2. Effects of Ba on amylase activity in contents of duodenum (A), jejunum (B), and ileum (C). Results were expressed as mean ± SEM, n = 6. a and b means significantly different (p < 0.05).

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 3. Effects of Ba on activity of lipase in contents of duodenum (A) and jejunum (B). Results were expressed as mean ± SEM, n = 6. a and b means significantly different (p < 0.05).

FIGURE 4
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 4. Effects of Ba on activity of trypsin in contents of duodenum (A) and jejunum (B). Results were expressed as mean ± SEM, n = 6. a and b means significantly different (p < 0.05).

Enzyme Activity Related to Absorption in Jejuna Mucosa of the Piglets

Figure 5 showed the results of sucrase (A), lactase (B), and maltase (C) activities. Half replacing the antibiotic with Ba only significantly increased the activity of lactase (P < 0.05) when compared with G1 group (Figure 5B). The piglets in G3 group had much higher activity of sucrase (P > 0.05), maltase (P < 0.05) compared with G1 and G2 group (Figures 5A,C). Compared with G1 group, half replacing the antibiotic with Ba did not affect the activity of AKPase, however when the piglet fed with Ba instead of antibiotic, AKPase activity was significantly improved (Figure 5D). And the same result was found in the activity of Na+, K+-ATPase (Figure 5E).

FIGURE 5
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 5. Effects of Ba on the activity of sucrase (A), lactase (B), maltase (C), AKPase (D), Na +, K +-ATPase (E), γ-GT (F), and DAO (G) in jejunal mucosa of piglets. Results were expressed as mean ± SEM, n = 6. a and b means significantly different (p < 0.05).

Feed supplemented with antibiotic or Ba did not induce any change in γ-GT activity in each group (Figure 5F). No significant difference of DAO activity was found between G1 and G2 group, while DAO activity in the piglets fed with Ba instead of antibiotic was significantly decreased (P < 0.05) (Figure 5G).

Effects of Ba on Transporter Expression

Compared with G1 group, half and total replacing the antibiotic with Ba both significantly reduced the SGLT1 expression in jejuna mucosa (P < 0.05), while no dramatical difference between G2 and G3 group (Figure 6). And half and total replacing the antibiotic with Ba did not affect the PEPT1 expression when compared with G1 group.

FIGURE 6
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 6. (A) Effects of Ba on the expression of SGLT1 and PEPT1 in jejuna mucosa of piglets. (B) Results were given as mean ± SEM, n = 6. a and b means significantly different (p < 0.05).

Effects of Ba on Intestinal Microbiota

To further characterize the changes in microbial population imposed by the use of Ba and antibiotics, 16S rRNA were classified taxonomically to the genera level. Similar Shannon diversity indexes were found in G1–G3 group, as well as Chao1, PD whole tree and observed species (Figures 7A–D). To further measure the variability in species composition when the piglets were fed the diet with half and total replacing the antibiotic with Ba, β-diversity indexes were analyzed. Based on the unweighted UniFrac distance analysis, the difference between the intestinal flora of the intestinal flora of G1, G2, and G3 was significant (p = 0.028, Figure 8A), but based on the weighted UniFrac distance, no differences were found (p = 0.199, Figure 8B). While no significant changes were found among the different treatments in the phylum and genus level of gut bacteria (Supplementary Figures S1, S2 and Supplementary Tables S1, S2).

FIGURE 7
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 7. Effects of Ba on α-diversity of microbial population in piglets. Shannon (A), Chao1 (B), PD whole tree (C), and observed species (D) was analyzed.

FIGURE 8
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 8. Effects of Ba on β-diversity of microbial population in piglets. Unweight unifrac (A) and weighted unifrac (B) was analyzed.

Discussion

As more and more people are increasingly looking at food safety and environmental contamination, antibiotics replacement has become a trend. Probiotics have been widely used as antibiotic replacement to enhance animal growth and intestinal health (Caporaso et al., 2010; Deng et al., 2013). However, it remains unclear whether probiotics impact on the nutrients digestion and absorption of piglets. Previous study found that diet supplemented with Bacillus amyloliquefaciens partly instead of antibiotics dramatically improved the growth performance of piglets (Wang et al., 2017). Hence, our study focused on the influences of probiotic Bacillus amyloliquefaciens as an alternative of antibiotics on activities of digestive enzymes in piglet intestine.

Carbohydrates are one of the most important components of the diet. In digestive tract, carbohydrates are mainly digested by salivary and pancreatic amylases, further broken down into monosaccharides by disaccridase, such as sucrase, maltase and lactase, which secreted by the BBM of enterocytes, and then are absorbed (Drozdowski and Thomson, 2006; Zhen et al., 2018). Wang and Gu (2010) found that amylase activity was remarkably higher in Arbor Acres broilers feed with Bacillus coagulans NJ0516 than that in control group. In current study, amylase activity in duodenum and ileum significantly higher in piglets administrated with Ba than the piglets fed the diet supplemented with antibiotics or Ba half replacing antibiotics, and Ba half replacing antibiotics dramatically increased amylase activity in jejunum compared with the antibiotic group. Compared with the piglets fed the diet containing antibiotic, an increase in sucrase, maltase and lactase in jejuna mucosa was observed when they were fed the diet supplemented with Ba. And the same results were reported that when rats administrated with probiotics Lactobacillus bulgaricus and Streptococcus thermophilus, sucrase and lactase activity was enhanced in intestinal mucosa (Southcott et al., 2008), and Goyal et al. (2013) found that probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG dramatically increased the activity of sucrase and lactase in BALB/c mice. In addition, Na+/K+-ATPase is a transmembrane protein and is responsible for driving the sodium-dependent glucose transporter (SGLT1) in BBM, which plays an important role in glucose transport. It has shown that the inhibition of SGLT1 was secondary to a reduction in Na+/K+-ATPase activity (Manoharan et al., 2018). However, we observed that instead of antibiotic, feeding Ba-supplemented diet significantly increased the activity of Na+/K+-ATPase in jejuna mucosa, though the expression of SGLT1 was remarkably decreased in piglets fed with Ba. The results indicate that as an alternative of antibiotic, Ba could influence the metabolism of carbohydrates metabolism, while the certain further research was needed to clarify the certain effect of Ba.

Dietary protein is digested by both mammalian and bacterial enzymes in the intestinal tract (Goyal et al., 2013; Switzar et al., 2013). The protease activity was significantly higher in the common carp fed with basal diets supplemented with Bacillus sp. compared with control group (Wang and Xu, 2006). It has been suggested that in our study, compared to antibiotic fed group, activities of chymotrpsin was significantly increased in jejunual and ileal contents of piglets fed with Ba half replacing antibiotics. There was a tendency for increased activity of chymotrpsin when the piglet fed diet supplemented with Ba instead of antibiotic, while no remarkable changes were observed. However, activities of trypsin in intestinal contents and γ-glutamyl transpeptidase (γ-GT) in jejuna mucosa of piglets were not affected by the diet supplemented with Ba. And Ba treatment did not change the expression of peptide transporter 1 (PEPT1), which is a kind of membrane transporter proteins and helps the cellular of oligopepetides (Daniel, 2004).

In addition, the increase of lipase activity leads to more effective fat absorption (Lowe, 1994; Karásková et al., 2015). However, Ogawa et al. (2015) indicated that Lactobacillus gasseri SBT2055 significantly decreased the lipase activity in order to increase size of fat emulsion droplet and suppress lipid absorption. In current study, we found that piglets in replacing half dosage of antibiotic with Ba had much higher activity of lipase in contents of duodenum and jejunum than piglets fed with antibiotic (P < 0.05), and piglets in Ba groups had the highest lipase activity in duodenum, although in jejunum, lipase activity was significantly decreased in piglets fed with Ba compared to Ba half replacing antibiotics group.

The intestinal environment plays a critical role in maintaining good health (Farhadi et al., 2003; Melo et al., 2015). DAO is one of the indicators of intestinal epithelial integrity (Tossou et al., 2016). It has been reported that antibiotic treatment significantly lowered DAO activity (Sato et al., 2016). However, in the present study, piglets administrated with Ba had much lower DAO activity compared with antibiotic group, which may indicate much better state of intestinal integrity. AKPase is a new factor which contributes to maintain gut homeostasis (Lalles, 2014; Melo et al., 2015). The deletion of intestinal AKPase gene caused a significant decrease of tight junction protein expression and function (Liu et al., 2016). In the present study, we found that Ba replacing antibiotic dramatically enhanced the activity of AKPase.

Intestinal microbiota is an important compartment of digestive tract of animals (Azad et al., 2018). Various researches have demonstrated that probiotic can positively regulate the composition of the intestinal macobiota (Cisek and Binek, 2014; Kristensen et al., 2016; Hu et al., 2017). Dietary supplementation of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens dramatically decreased the population of Escherichia coli and increased Lactobacillus population in cecum (Lei et al., 2014). The administration of Lactobacillus B1 significantly decreased the number of E. coli and increased lactic acid bacteria in cecal digesta of chickens (Peng et al., 2016). While in the current study, no significant influences were found when the piglet fed with Ba instead of antibiotics.

Conclusion

In conclusion, results from the previous study indicate that supplementation with Ba enhanced growth performance of piglets (Wang et al., 2017). This enhancement was associated with the positive influence of tract digestibility and intestinal integrity. Therefore, according to our research, Bacillus amyloliquefaciens SC06 could be used as alternative to antibiotics in piglet diets.

Author Contributions

WL and LG designed the experiment. SH and XC drafted the manuscript. XC carried out most of the experiments and analyzed the data. YWu, XM, and HX participated in the animal experiment. YWa helped to detect some parameters. XZ performed the analysis of the microbiota. WL and LG had primary responsibility for the final content.

Funding

This research was jointly supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 31472128 and 31672460), and by the Key Project of Science and Technology of Zhejiang Province, China (Grant No. 2006C12086).

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the staff in this laboratory for their valuable input to this study.

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2018.02427/full#supplementary-material

FIGURE S1 | The changes of gut bacterial phyla in different treatments.

FIGURE S2 | The changes of gut bacterial genera in different treatments.

TABLE S1 | Detailed data for the gut bacterial phyla.

TABLE S2 | Detailed data for the gut bacterial genera.

Abbreviations

γ-GT, γ-glutamyltranspeptidase; AKPase, Alkaline phosphatase; BBM, Brush border membrane; DAO, Diamine oxidase; PEPT1, Peptide transporter 1; SGLT1, Sodium-dependent glucose transporter.

References

Azad, M. A. K., Sarker, M., Li, T., and Yin, J. (2018). Probiotic Species in the Modulation of Gut Microbiota: An Overview. Biomed. Res. Int. 2018, 9478630. doi: 10.1155/2018/9478630

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Caporaso, J. G., Kuczynski, J., Stombaugh, J., Bittinger, K., Bushman, F. D., Costello, E. K., et al. (2010). QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat. Methods. 7, 335–336. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.f.303

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cisek, A. A., and Binek, M. (2014). Chicken intestinal microbiota function with a special emphasis on the role of probiotic bacteria. Pol. J. Vet. Sc. 17, 385–394. doi: 10.2478/pjvs-2014-0057

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Daniel, H. (2004). Molecular and Integrative Physiology of Intestinal Peptide Transport. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 66, 361–384. doi: 10.1146/annurev.physiol.66.032102.144149

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Deng, J., Li, Y., Zhang, J., and Yang, Q. (2013). Co-administration of Bacillus subtilis RJGP16 and Lactobacillus salivarius B1 strongly enhances the intestinal mucosal immunity of piglets. Res. Vet. Sci. 94, 62–68. doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2012.07.025

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Djurasevic, S., Jama, A., Jasnic, N., Vujovic, P., Jovanovic, M., Mitic-Culafic, D., et al. (2017). The Protective Effects of Probiotic Bacteria on Cadmium Toxicity in Rats. J. Med. Food. 20, 189–196. doi: 10.1089/jmf.2016.0090

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Drozdowski, L. A., and Thomson, A. B. (2006). Intestinal sugar transport. World. J. Gastroenterol. 12, 1657–1670. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i11.1657

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Farhadi, A., Banan, A., Fields, J. Z., and Keshavarzian, A. (2003). Intestinal barrier: an interface between health and disease. J. Gastroen. Hepatol. 18, 479–497. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1746.2003.03032.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Giang, H. H., Viet, T. Q., Ogle, B., and Lindberg, J. E. (2010). Effects of different probiotic complexes of lactic acid bacteria on growth performance and gut environment of weaned piglets. Livest. Sci. 133, 182–184. doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2010.06.059

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

González-Ortiz, G., Castillejos, L., Mallo, J. J., Àngels Calvo-Torras, M., and Dolores Baucells, M. (2013). Effects of dietary supplementation of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens CECT 5940 and Enterococcus faecium CECT 4515 in adult healthy dogs. Arch. Anim. Nutr. 67, 406–415. doi: 10.1080/1745039X.2013.830517

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Goyal, N., Rishi, P., and Shukla, G. (2013). Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG antagonizes Giardia intestinalis induced oxidative stress and intestinal disaccharidases: an experimental study. World. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 29, 1049–1057. doi: 10.1007/s11274-013-1268-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hickey, L., Jacobs, S. E., and Garland, S. M. (2012). Probiotics in neonatology. J. Paediatr. Child. Health. 48, 777–783. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1754.2012.02508.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hu, S., Wang, L., and Jiang, Z. (2017). Dietary additive probiotics modulation of the intestinal microbiota. Protein. Peptide. Lett. 24, 382–387. doi: 10.2174/0929866524666170223143615

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ji, J., Hu, S., Zheng, M., Du, W., Shang, Q., and Li, W. (2013). Bacillus amyloliquefaciens SC06 inhibits ETEC-induced pro-inflammatory responses by suppression of MAPK signaling pathways in IPEC-1 cells and diarrhea in weaned piglets. Livest. Sci. 158, 206–214. doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2013.09.017

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Karásková, K., Suchý, P., and Straková, E. (2015). Current use of phytogenic feed additives in animal nutrition: a review. Czech. J. Anim. Sci. 60, 521–530. doi: 10.17221/8594-CJAS

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kristensen, N. B., Bryrup, T., Allin, K. H., Nielsen, T., Hansen, T. H., and Pedersen, O. (2016). Alterations in fecal microbiota composition by probiotic supplementation in healthy adults: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Genome. Med. 8, 52. doi: 10.1186/s13073-016-0300-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lalles, J. (2014). Intestinal alkaline phosphatase: novel functions and protective effects. Nutr. Rev. 72, 82–94. doi: 10.1111/nure.12082

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lee, Y., Kim, B., Lee, B., Jo, K. I., Lee, N. K., Chung, C. H., et al. (2008). Purification and characterization of cellulase produced by Bacillus amyoliquefaciens DL-3 utilizing rice hull. Bioresource. Technol. 99, 378–386. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2006.12.013

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lei, X., Piao, X., Ru, Y., Zhang, H., Péron, A., and Zhang, H. (2014). Effect of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens-based Direct-fed Microbial on Performance, Nutrient Utilization, Intestinal Morphology and Cecal Microflora in Broiler Chickens. Asian. Austral. J. Anim. 28, 239–246. doi: 10.5713/ajas.14.0330

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, W., Hu, D., Huo, H., Zhang, W., Adiliaghdam, F., Morrison, S., et al. (2016). Intestinal Alkaline Phosphatase Regulates Tight Junction Protein Levels. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 222, 1009–1017. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.12.006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lowe, M. E. (1994). Pancreatic triglyceride lipase and colipase: Insights into dietary fat digestion. Gastroenterology. 107, 1524–1536. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(94)90559-2

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Manoharan, P., Sundaram, S., Singh, S., and Sundaram, U. (2018). Inducible Nitric Oxide Regulates Brush Border Membrane Na-Glucose Co-transport, but Not Na:H Exchange via p38 MAP Kinase in Intestinal Epithelial Cells. Cells. 7, 111. doi: 10.3390/cells7080111

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Martin, M. J., Thottathil, S. E., and Newman, T. B. (2015). Antibiotics Overuse in Animal Agriculture: A Call to Action for Health Care Providers. Am. J. Public. Health. 105, 2409–2410. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2015.302870

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Melo, A. D., Silveira, H., Luciano, F. B., Andrade, C., Costa, L. B., and Rostagno, M. H. (2015). Intestinal Alkaline Phosphatase: Potential Roles in Promoting Gut Health in Weanling Piglets and Its Modulation by Feed Additives-A Review. Asian. Austral. J. Anim. 29, 16–22. doi: 10.5713/ajas.15.0120

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ogawa, A., Kobayashi, T., Sakai, F., Kadooka, Y., and Kawasaki, Y. (2015). Lactobacillus gasseri SBT2055 suppresses fatty acid release through enlargement of fat emulsion size in vitro and promotes fecal fat excretion in healthy Japanese subjects. Lipids. Health. Dis. 14, 20. doi: 10.1186/s12944-015-0019-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Peng, Q., Zeng, X. F., Zhu, J. L., Wang, S., Liu, X. T., Hou, C. L., et al. (2016). Effects of dietary Lactobacillus plantarum B1 on growth performance, intestinal microbiota, and short chain fatty acid profiles in broiler chickens. Poultry. Sci. 95, 893. doi: 10.3382/ps/pev435

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sato, H., Zhang, L. S., Martinez, K., Chang, E. B., Yang, Q., Wang, F., et al. (2016). Antibiotics Suppress Activation of Intestinal Mucosal Mast Cells and Reduce Dietary Lipid Absorption in Sprague-Dawley Rats. Gastroenterology. 151, 923–932. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.07.009

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Southcott, E., Tooley, K. L., Howarth, G. S., Davidson, G. P., and Butler, R. N. (2008). Yoghurts containing probiotics reduce disruption of the small intestinal barrier in methotrexate-treated rats. Dig. Dis. Sci. 53, 1837–1841. doi: 10.1007/s10620-008-0275-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Switzar, L., Giera, M., and Niessen, W. M. (2013). Protein digestion: an overview of the available techniques and recent developments. J. Proteome. Res. 12, 1067–1077. doi: 10.1021/pr301201x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tojo, R., Suarez, A., Clemente, M. G., de los Reyes-Gavilán, C. G., Margolles, A., Gueimonde, M., et al. (2014). Intestinal microbiota in health and disease: Role of bifidobacteria in gut homeostasis. World J. Gastroenterol 20, 15163–15176. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i41.15163

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tossou, M. C., Liu, H., Bai, M., Chen, S., Cai, Y., Duraipandiyan, V., et al. (2016). Effect of High Dietary Tryptophan on Intestinal Morphology and Tight Junction Protein of Weaned Pig. Biomed. Res. Int. 2016, 2912418. doi: 10.1155/2016/2912418

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

van den Bogaard, A. E. V., and Stobberingh, E. E. (2000). Epidemiology of resistance to antibiotics links between animals and humans. Int. J. Antimicrob. 14, 327–335.

Google Scholar

Walsh, T. R., and Wu, Y. (2016). China bans colistin as a feed additive for animals. Lancet. Infect. Dis. 16, 1102–1103. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(16)30329-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, X., Yang, F., Liu, C., Zhou, H., Wu, G., Qiao, S., et al. (2012). Dietary Supplementation with the Probiotic Lactobacillus fermentum I5007 and the Antibiotic Aureomycin Differentially Affects the Small Intestinal Proteomes of Weanling Piglets. J. Nutr. 142, 7–13. doi: 10.3945/jn.111.147074

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, Y., and Gu, Q. (2010). Effect of probiotic on growth performance and digestive enzyme activity of Arbor Acres broilers. Res. Vet. Sci. 89, 163–167. doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2010.03.009

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, Y., Wu, Y., Wang, B., Cao, X., Fu, A., Li, Y., et al. (2017). Effects of probiotic Bacillus as a substitute for antibiotics on antioxidant capacity and intestinal autophagy of piglets. Amb. Express. 7, 52. doi: 10.1186/s13568-017-0353-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, Y. B., and Xu, Z. R. (2006). Effect of probiotics for common carp (Cyprinus carpio) based on growth performance and digestive enzyme activities. Anim. Feed. Sci. Tech. 127, 283–292. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2005.09.003

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhen, W., Shao, Y., Gong, X., Wu, Y., Geng, Y., Wang, Z., et al. (2018). Effect of dietary Bacillus coagulans supplementation on growth performance and immune responses of broiler chickens challenged by Salmonella enteritidis. Poult. Sci. 97, 2654–2666. doi: 10.3382/ps/pey119

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: piglets, antibiotics, Bacillus amyloliquefaciens, digestive enzyme activity, intestinal integrity

Citation: Hu S, Cao X, Wu Y, Mei X, Xu H, Wang Y, Zhang X, Gong L and Li W (2018) Effects of Probiotic Bacillus as an Alternative of Antibiotics on Digestive Enzymes Activity and Intestinal Integrity of Piglets. Front. Microbiol. 9:2427. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02427

Received: 27 July 2018; Accepted: 21 September 2018;
Published: 22 October 2018.

Edited by:

Jie Yin, Institute of Subtropical Agriculture (CAS), China

Reviewed by:

Yiannis Kourkoutas, Democritus University of Thrace, Greece
Yanchun Shao, Huazhong Agricultural University, China

Copyright © 2018 Hu, Cao, Wu, Mei, Xu, Wang, Zhang, Gong and Li. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Li Gong, 11617002@zju.edu.cn Weifen Li, wfli@zju.edu.cn

These authors have contributed equally to this work